RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Yes We Can Print
Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:07

Sterling writes: "At FCI Englewood, a federal prison, as I wait for my appeal to be heard, I am looking back on the presidency of Barack Obama. A supporter recently sent me a subscription to New York Magazine and the first issue I received, ironically, features the eight years of the Obama presidency, under the title 'Hope and What Came After.'"

Jeffrey Sterling. (photo: AP)
Jeffrey Sterling. (photo: AP)


Yes We Can

By Jeffery Sterling, Reader Supported News

22 November 16

 

t FCI Englewood, a federal prison, as I wait for my appeal to be heard, I am looking back on the presidency of Barack Obama. A supporter recently sent me a subscription to New York Magazine and the first issue I received, ironically, features the eight years of the Obama presidency, under the title “Hope and What Came After.” I was immediately struck by the title used to name the series of pieces about and from Obama on his tenure, because the same title could be used for my experience during the Obama years. Obama’s election, for many reasons, meant and embodied hope for me; what came afterward was anything but. As his presidency draws to an end, I can only hope that the change will once again have an impact on my life, maybe this time for the better.

In my opinion, the election and presidency of the first African American president of the United States has been a remarkable time for the country, one we should all be proud of. Like many Americans, I found so much to identify with and embrace in Barack Obama. I distinctly and fondly remember the Obama presidential campaign as one of genuine hope for positive change and a real, collective attitude of “Yes We Can.” I was definitely all in. I will never forget that November 2008 evening when Obama was declared president-elect. My wife Holly and I had tears in our eyes, overcome with fulfillment of the promise of hope. We were elated: “He ... We did it!” Accentuating that heartfelt euphoria was our implicit, if somewhat fanciful view that Obama’s election would strengthen our own determination in the face of overwhelming opposition.

It had been over two years since our home was invaded in 2006 by the FBI conducting a search as part of a seemingly unending leak investigation with me in its fixed crosshairs. Even prior to that time, we had been hounded for years, our entire lives subject to the investigative whims of the DOJ and FBI. We weren’t filled with delusions that the election of a black president would signal the end of the investigation, but we did enthusiastically take it as a sign that the nightmare just might be over. I could not have possibly imagined that that November 2008 evening was the beginning of what would turn out to be the most horrible time of my life. With that November 2008 vote, I unwittingly placed myself within the throes of what was to become one of Obama’s more unfortunate legacies.

Prior to the Obama presidency, I had worked as a case officer for the CIA. In 2001, I sued the CIA for employment discrimination based on race. The Bush administration DOJ fought for and won the ability to deny me the constitutional right to be free from racial discrimination and stand up against it, arguing that my doing so would endanger the national security of the US. The courts confirmed that I lacked those constitutional rights. It was a terrible blow to my view of myself as an American, punctuated by being fired from the CIA and losing everything. But I persevered and built a new life for myself. My resolve was to face an even more difficult test once Barack Obama became president.

Targeting whistleblowers with a McCarthyesque fervor was not part of the Obama presidential campaign. I cannot imagine that even one vote was cast for Obama based on the assurance that he would engage in relentlessly hunting down and prosecuting whistleblowers at a rate never before seen in any previous president. Yet, that is exactly the silent agenda that Obama brought and engaged in with his presidency and his administration.

The impact that Obama’s silent agenda has had is well documented: John Kiriakou, Thomas Drake, and Chelsea Manning, to name just a few, have had their lives turned upside down not because their actions posed harm to the US, but because they had the courage to tell the truth. Their lives were thrown asunder at the whims of the same unfettered agenda which, from the moment Obama became president, gave new life to the years-long leak investigation that had hounded me relentlessly since being fired from the CIA back in 2002.

Obama’s first term was an unbelievably trying time for me. Clearly from 2009, the new administration had an unfounded determination to target me by any means necessary. The result was that I was arrested in January 2011, charged with violating the Espionage Act, immediately fired from my job as a healthcare fraud investigator, forced away from my wife and my home, and returned to the hell I had worked so hard to pick myself up from. All that I had fought to regain was in jeopardy, and the losses continued to mount even when Obama started his second term in 2013. It was a terrible, extremely disheartening limbo with a federal indictment hanging over my head. I was unable to find work, had expended all of my resources, and was on the verge of losing my home by the time the trial happened in 2015. What came after hope for me was being put on trial for a crime I did not commit.

The trial was hurtful. The Obama DOJ had won the right to call and question any reporter on sources, but they chose not to. Instead, they played a more substantial hand, characterizing me as a vindictive African American who had the nerve to sue the CIA for discrimination. An administration that had been strikingly silent on issues of race, except in response to the many crises that occurred during its tenure, made it a point to use race as proof and basis for my prosecution. The Bush administration had told me that the safety of the country meant I had no civil rights; the Obama administration took that denial and used my fight for civil rights against me. Incredibly, it took the first African American president with the first African American attorney general to take the loss and denial of my civil rights and use them to do to my life what the previous administration could not or would not do. The effect was undeniable. I was convicted and sentenced to 3 1/2 years in prison.

The hypocrisy of Obama’s silent agenda has been shocking. Leaks of classified information are nothing new in any government, but Obama has taken them to a new, disturbing level. Those who mishandle or leak classified information, provided they do so at the behest of or are in good stead with the administration, are privately congratulated while publicly presented facing feigned machinations of equal treatment under the law. Numerous examples have been commonplace throughout the Obama years, such as the situations with Generals Petraeus and Cartwright, among others. I would be remiss in not mentioning that I have certainly noticed the disparity in how the Obama DOJ and FBI have approached presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. What would life be like for these favored individuals had they faced the same prosecutorial fervor I have? That is a question that has lingered with me throughout the Obama years, particularly given Obama’s assurance of equality and transparency.

Shakespeare reminds me that “The miserable have no other medicine, but only hope.” It feels somewhat perverse to think that the end of the Obama presidency might signal hope for the future renewed in me after having hope deferred for so many years. For me, Obama has represented the continuation, if not an enhanced though reversed version, of the same African American experience that led to his becoming president; that same sort of perseverance and never giving up in the face of overwhelming opposition is what I’ve had to rely on to survive through the Obama years.

But I cannot say that renewed hope is or will be inspired by the looming ascension of Donald Trump. During their campaigns, neither Trump nor Clinton offered anything more than an unapologetic return to business as usual for the well-entrenched social or political establishments, both of which Obama had promised to change for the better. The importance of this election was lost upon me, as I could not vote. The loss of that fundamental right was somewhat assuaged by the knowledge that this time around, I at least wouldn’t be directly contributing to my own subjugation.

My inspiration for the future has come from an unexpected avenue. While in prison, I have received the support of thousands upon thousands of people. I note that those who have expressed solidarity through letters and by signing petitions on my behalf are like me and believed in the hope upon which Obama had campaigned and won. All of this support has been an incredible silver lining by which I have been able to persevere through the unfulfilled promises and debauchery of hope that has represented the presidency of Barack Obama, and it has motivated me to believe in hope again and know that “Yes I Can.”



Jeffrey Sterling, a former CIA case officer, is currently serving a 3 1/2-year prison sentence for leaking classified information to a New York Times reporter. His forthcoming book will be published by Nation Books.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: 5 Trump Headlines More Outrageous Than the "Hamilton" Tiff Print
Tuesday, 22 November 2016 12:23

Cole writes: "Trump is the master of misdirection, the techniques magicians use to get you to look elsewhere while they perform their sleight of hand. This weekend on social media was taken up with his slamming matches with the cast of the play 'Hamilton,' who addressed a respectful appeal to vice president-elect Mike Pence to honor the country's diversity as he was leaving the playhouse. Trump also slammed Saturday Night Live for its satire of him."

Donald Trump. (photo: Martin Schoeller/TIME)
Donald Trump. (photo: Martin Schoeller/TIME)


5 Trump Headlines More Outrageous Than the "Hamilton" Tiff

By Juan Cole, Informed Comment

22 November 16

 

rump is the master of misdirection, the techniques magicians use to get you to look elsewhere while they perform their sleight of hand. This weekend on social media was taken up with his slamming matches with the cast of the play “Hamilton,” who addressed a respectful appeal to vice president-elect Mike Pence to honor the country’s diversity as he was leaving the playhouse. Trump also slammed Saturday Night Live for its satire of him.

The Hamilton story was actually placed above the fold at the New York Times, while the news that broke Friday that Trump had settled the student lawsuits against him over the fraudulent “Trump University” for $25 million was placed below the fold.

So here are the headlines that should have been above the “Hamilton” slamming match in all our newspapers, and should have been shared and retweeted on social media:

1. Trump charged some students as much as $30,000 a year for tuition at his so-called university, in return for which they got nothing of value. The Better Business Bureau gave the “university” a D-minus rating.

As George Takei of Star Trek fame tweeted, Trump probably made $150 million with this educational fraud, even after paying the settlement.

What Mr. Takei did not say is that even the $25 mn. settlement can be taken off Trump’s taxes! This is the man who ran on lowering student debt— but who created debt for 5,000 students, and useless debt (many indebted students at least do have a real degree).

2. A Neo-Nazi conference was held in Washington this weekend to celebrate Trump’s win, in which there were actually “Heils” shouted out from the audience and anti-Jewish statements were made. These white supremacists go by the name alternative right or alt-right by which they mean that they are to the right of the conservatives. The corporate media, in accordance with the project of normalizing Trumpism, has been willing to refer to them by this term that they themselves chose for propaganda purposes. But they are just white supremacists with a nostalgia for 1930s Germany.

3. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) threatened to take the incoming Trump administration to court if they engaged in waterboarding, which is included in international law as a form of torture. Trump ran on a platform of using torture, and at one point promised to bring back waterboarding. His nominee as head of the Central Intelligence Agency, Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-KS), has said he does not consider waterboarding to be torture, and affirmed that it is constitutional. (The Bill of Rights forbids cruel and unusual punishment, and the US is signatory to treaties and instruments that ban torture).

4. Attorney-General nominee Sen. Jeff Sessions is linked to a galaxy of far right wing anti-immigration groups

5. Members of the Israeli cabinet are coming out in favor of white supremacist Steve Bannon, the new White House propagandist under Trump. Bannon’s Breitbart.com and the Neofascist tendency it represents have often engaged openly in bashing Jews. (Bannons says that Breitbart is an organ of the “alt-right,” the Neofascist strain referenced in “2” above). Like many white nationalists, however, they support Israeli squatters against brown Palestinians, and this is the basis on which PM Binyamin Netanyahu’s extremist cabinet is willing to give them a pass. The term “Antisemite” is now reserved by the Zionist right wing only for human rights critics of the theft of Palestinian land and resources, and is not applied to actual bigots who are prejudiced against, you know, like . . . Jews. This development is not exactly shocking, since the Likud Party’s “revisionist” Zionist has roots in the 1930s mass political movements and is influenced by fascist thinking of that era.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: Tulsi, Don't Fall for Trump's Trap Print
Tuesday, 22 November 2016 11:37

Galindez writes: "Don't do it - it's a trap. I may be wrong, but I believe Donald Trump is setting you up to be the fall gal."

Representative Tulsi Gabbard. (photo: Flickr)
Representative Tulsi Gabbard. (photo: Flickr)


Tulsi, Don't Fall for Trump's Trap

By Scott Galindez, Reader Supported News

22 November 16

 

understand your desire to serve our country. I understand that it is hard to say no to the Commander in Chief. You served our country honorably and you probably think that you can influence the direction of Donald Trump. Your values are likely leading you toward serving in the Trump administration.

Don’t do it – it’s a trap. I may be wrong, but I believe Donald Trump is setting you up to be the fall gal. The Donald will always point to you as an example of a woman and a progressive from whom he got advice before taking military action. As a member of the administration you will not be able to publicly speak out against policies that you disagree with.

You are more than qualified to serve as UN ambassador or in any national security role. You are a rising star in the Democratic Party. My guess is that they know they can ruin your career by tying you to their policies. Fast forward four years and multiple military actions that some will tie to you because you did the right thing and didn’t publicly criticize the policies of your boss. I suppose you could publicly resign and express your opposition to the policies. Are you willing to risk that being the end of your political career?

We need you in Our Revolution, fighting for real change. We need you to stand up for our veterans and not have to go along with a policy that put them in harm’s way for Donald Trump’s oversized ego.

Don’t jeopardize your career to serve a racist bigot who will point to you to show he is not sexist. Wait four years and help us remove him from office. Your country needs you in the fight against Donald Trump, not in an effort to make him look good.



Scott Galindez attended Syracuse University, where he first became politically active. The writings of El Salvador's slain archbishop Oscar Romero and the on-campus South Africa divestment movement converted him from a Reagan supporter to an activist for Peace and Justice. Over the years he has been influenced by the likes of Philip Berrigan, William Thomas, Mitch Snyder, Don White, Lisa Fithian, and Paul Wellstone. Scott met Marc Ash while organizing counterinaugural events after George W. Bush's first stolen election. Scott will be spending a year covering the presidential election from Iowa.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The Trump Administration Will Be the Most Dangerous Since Richard Nixon Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=36361"><span class="small">Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Facebook Page</span></a>   
Tuesday, 22 November 2016 09:04

Reich writes: "Trump has picked Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions for Attorney General - to be in charge of enforcing all the laws of the United States and litigating of all cases up to and including the Supreme Court."

Robert Reich. (photo: unknown)
Robert Reich. (photo: unknown)


The Trump Administration Will Be the Most Dangerous Since Richard Nixon

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Facebook Page

22 November 16

 

rump has picked Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions for Attorney General – to be in charge of enforcing all the laws of the United States and litigating of all cases up to and including the Supreme Court.

Sessions is a virulent conservative who as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee has opposed immigration reform and refused to cut mandatory minimum prison sentences. He was rejected for a federal judgeship because of racist comments and actions, by a Republican-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee in the Reagan administration. And he has disparaged the Voting Rights Act.

This is a horrendous pick, proving – as if anyone needed further proof – the Trump administration will be the most dangerous since Richard Nixon’s, or perhaps ever.

What do you think?


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
We Can Confront Torture Advocate Michael Pompeo Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=36478"><span class="small">John Kiriakou, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Monday, 21 November 2016 14:51

Kiriakou writes: "There are some things we can do. We can write our members of Congress and demand that they hold the CIA and its new director to both the letter and the spirit of the law. Torture is illegal. That isn't going to change."

Representative Mike Pompeo, a hawkish Republican from Kansas, rose to prominence during the investigation into the 2012 attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya. (photo: Drew Angerer/NYT)
Representative Mike Pompeo, a hawkish Republican from Kansas, rose to prominence during the investigation into the 2012 attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya. (photo: Drew Angerer/NYT)


We Can Confront Torture Advocate Michael Pompeo

By John Kiriakou, Reader Supported News

21 November 16

 

resident-elect Donald Trump’s nomination of Rep. Michael Pompeo (R-Kan.) sends a crystal clear message that Trump was telling the American people the truth when he said that he would bring back the torture program and do “a hell of a lot worse.” Pompeo himself said that CIA officers who engaged in torture “are not torturers. They are patriots.” The only conclusion one can draw is that Trump intends to return the CIA to the dark days of the Bush administration. And this is despite the fact that torture is illegal under the Federal Torture Act, the United Nations Conventions Against Torture, and the McCain-Feinstein Amendment.

Pompeo’s nomination was something of a surprise. Although he supported and endorsed Trump during the Republican primaries, he was not a player in the campaign, he is not one of the more prominent members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), where he served only three years, and he was not among the names being circulated among “people in the know” in Washington for CIA Director. But Trump apparently likes West Point graduates, who are more likely to say, “Yes, sir” than they are to say, “Mr. President, let me tell you why that’s a bad idea.” Pompeo is a yes man with credentials. He graduated first in his class at the U.S. Military Academy, and then went to Harvard Law School before going into business and politics.

Pompeo also has towed the Tea Party line on national security issues since being elected to Congress in 2010. He called NSA whistleblower Ed Snowden “a traitor” and in an interview on C-SPAN added, “he should be brought back from Russia and given due process, and I think the proper outcome would be that he would be given a death sentence.” Pompeo was a member of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, where he said that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had “failed to lead,” despite the fact that his committee’s leadership had found that the former secretary had done nothing wrong related to Benghazi. And he wants to keep the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay open, calling it “the right option for American security” and “an important asset that must remain open.” He said after a visit to Guantanamo that he had seen the detainees there and that he wants them “right where they are.”

Further afield, Pompeo has said that he supports dragnet surveillance against American citizens, including NSA interception of all U.S. metadata, voicemails, emails, and text messages. He wants this information housed along with “lifestyle information” on Americans in a database that would be accessible to all U.S. law enforcement, something more akin to Orwell’s Big Brother than any other politician has put forth. He criticized his Congressional colleagues for rolling back some of NSA’s warrantless wiretapping programs in the aftermath of the Snowden disclosures, and added that the lone wolf attacks in San Bernardino in 2015 were a result of Congress not allowing NSA to do its job. Pompeo apparently has never commented publicly on the civil liberties and legal questions at play when a U.S. intelligence agency spies on American citizens.

So what can be done about a far-right activist CIA director serving a far-right president and being overseen by far-right Congressional committees? For us average citizens, not much, unfortunately.

But there are some things we can do. We can write our members of Congress and demand that they hold the CIA and its new director to both the letter and the spirit of the law. Torture is illegal. That isn’t going to change. If the CIA engages in torture, its leadership must be brought to task. If the Justice Department won’t file charges against torturers and those who order the torture, then maybe foreign courts will, just like Spanish judge Baltasar Garzon, who filed charges of human rights violations against former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet. We can write, speak out, and march against human rights and legal violations. We can initiate direct actions. And perhaps most importantly, if we have standing, we can sue, bog the CIA down in litigation, and force as much of the information as possible into the glare of the public spotlight.

Pompeo’s nomination is a bad thing. But it’s not the end of the world. We just have to be ready for a fight.



John Kiriakou is a former CIA counterterrorism officer and a former senior investigator with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. John became the sixth whistleblower indicted by the Obama administration under the Espionage Act - a law designed to punish spies. He served 23 months in prison as a result of his attempts to oppose the Bush administration's torture program.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 Next > End >>

Page 1821 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN