RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Washington Post Embraces 'Fake News' by Printing Debunked Climate Misinformation Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=20808"><span class="small">Joe Romm, ThinkProgress</span></a>   
Wednesday, 23 November 2016 15:34

Romm writes: "Running opinions that haven't been fact-checked amounts to normalizing the fake news they decry."

The Washington Post. (photo: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty)
The Washington Post. (photo: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty)


Washington Post Embraces 'Fake News' by Printing Debunked Climate Misinformation

By Joe Romm, ThinkProgress

23 November 16

 

Running opinions that haven’t been fact-checked amounts to normalizing the fake news they decry.

rump’s climate plan might not be so bad after all,” blasted an attention-grabbing Washington Post headline on Monday. Such a headline raises red flags as mainstream media outlets seek to combat “fake news”?—?misinformation aimed at confusing the public that that comes from a repeatedly debunked source but still manages to creep into a widely used and generally more legitimate news outlet.

In this case, the fake news is a long-debunked “analysis” of the Paris climate agreement by perhaps the single most debunked writer in the entire climate arena: Bjorn Lomborg. Lomborg uses the piece to greenwash the extremely anti-scientific and pro-pollution “climate plan” of President-elect Donald Trump.

(photo: ThinkProgress)

By long-debunked, I mean that the leading analytical experts on the Paris pledges?—?the intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs)?—?have explained that Lomborg’s analysis “appears to have no basis in fact,” as I wrote last year.

I checked with those Climate Interactive experts in light of Lomborg’s new op-ed, and they stand by that statement. In fact, they have re-debunked Lomborg, and John Sterman, director of MIT Sloan School’s System Dynamics Group, sums it up this way:

Dr. Lomborg sets out to show that the INDCs are useless. To do so he grossly misrepresents the pledges. He constructs an incomplete accounting of the pledges that omits the pledges of many nations, ignores China’s pledge to cap its emissions by 2030, and assumes that the [European Union countries] abandon their commitment to emissions reductions as soon as their pledges are fulfilled.”

The scientists at Climate Action Tracker similarly debunked Lomborg last year. The CAT scientists also point us to a London School of Economics debunking, and one by the Australian-German Climate and Energy College, “Facts4Paris: Lomborg. Wrong again.”

“Lomborg. Wrong again” sums up exactly why the op-ed is fake news and why the Washington Post should be ashamed of publishing it. Leading scientists have been debunking Lomborg’s false and leading claims since he started decades ago.

Back in 2002, top scientists debunked Lomborg’s first book at length in the pages of Scientific American. Back in 2010, Yale University Press published The Lomborg Deception, detailing how Lomborg’s work is “a mirage” and “a house of cards,” as biologist Thomas Lovejoy wrote in the foreword (see also Newsweek on “Debunking Lomborg” here).

Ironically, the same day the Post published Lomborg’s op-ed, they published another piece titled, “Fake news is just the beginning.”

“Facebook is on the defensive after the elections, with accusations that it helped spread misinformation,” the piece begins. The Post notes that “after a torrent of criticism from his employees and the media?—?and indication that fake election news spread widely,” CEO Mark Zuckerberg “relented and took responsibility. He promised to improve Facebook’s detection, reporting and verification of news.” The piece continues:

The tech industry has stepped into the field of publishing and communications without accepting the responsibility that comes with doing so.

When will the Washington Post “improve detection, reporting and verification of news?” Where exactly is the “responsibility” from the Post editors in publishing the Lomborg’s misinformation on an issue of existential importance to the country? This isn’t the first time the Post has published Lomborg’s nonsense: back in 2010, the Climate Science Rapid Response Team debunked another Washington Post op-ed by Lomborg.

But wait, you say, Lomborg’s piece is published in the “opinions” section not “news.” Sorry that long-standing excuse for not fact checking op-eds and for publishing misinformation no longer holds water?—?if it ever did?—?for two reasons.

First, how exactly are readers to know the Post is publishing something it hasn’t fact-checked? Would the Post run a disclaimer acknowledging the piece has not been fact-checked and may be false? Of course they wouldn’t. Yet the disclaimer would be accurate whereas the article itself is not. Such is the Orwellian world we live in now.

Second, as a new piece on fake news by the Post’s own fact-checker explains, everybody has “shared something based on the headline without actually reading the link.”

The goal of much, if not most, fake news is simply to spread a false headline far and wide. Newspaper editors have known for decades that most people don’t read most stories much beyond the headline. That’s even more true today with so many readers getting their news via Facebook and Twitter, search engines and content aggregators.

Thus, vastly more people see the headline of any story than actually read much of the content.

So potentially millions of people could have seen the Post’s absurd headline, “Trump’s climate plan might not be so bad after all” without knowing it comes from an opinion piece that has not been fact-checked, written by a widely debunked writer.

Even worse, the piece does not actually discuss most of Trump’s climate plan. It focuses almost entirely on his pledge to quit the Paris deal. Lomborg writes, “Despite its length, and for all of its heat and bluster, the election campaign left many unanswered questions and understandable concerns about the president-elect’s positions on climate change, aid and development.”

Untrue. The campaign was actually very clear. On October 26, Trump promised: “I will also cancel all wasteful climate change spending from Obama-Clinton, including all global warming payments to the United Nations. These steps will save $100 billion over 8 years.”

Lomborg blithely asserts that a couple of Trump’s vague and meaningless statements mean he might be open to “an innovation-based green energy approach that will harness U.S. ingenuity.” In fact, Trump’s climate plan would require ending all federal clean energy development (and climate science research).

But hey, don’t worry about the facts. Didn’t we read somewhere that the Washington Post says “Trump’s climate plan might not be so bad after all?” They wouldn’t print that if it weren’t true, would they?

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: The Standing Rock Protests Are a Taste of Things to Come Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=43002"><span class="small">Kate Aronoff, Guardian UK</span></a>   
Wednesday, 23 November 2016 13:41

Aronoff writes: "The way opponents of the Dakota Access pipeline have been treated by police is likely to be replicated on a massive scale under Donald Trump."

Police confront protesters near the Standing Rock Indian Reservation, North Dakota on 20 November. (photo: Stephanie Keith/Reuters)
Police confront protesters near the Standing Rock Indian Reservation, North Dakota on 20 November. (photo: Stephanie Keith/Reuters)


The Standing Rock Protests Are a Taste of Things to Come

By Kate Aronoff, Guardian UK

23 November 16

 

The way opponents of the Dakota Access pipeline have been treated by police is likely to be replicated on a massive scale under Donald Trump

orrific scenes have been coming out of North Dakota these last several days, where the battle is ongoing to stop the Dakota Access pipeline. On Sunday night, police turned tear gas and rubber bullets on hundreds of unarmed “water protectors”, as those taking on the pipeline prefer to be called. They deployed water cannons as well, in temperatures well below freezing. More than 160 people were injured, and many sent to the hospital. As a result of the standoff, a young woman could lose her arm.

For those with a passing knowledge of the kind of tactics faced by America’s civil rights movement, the above might sound like blast from our more brutal past. As Donald Trump prepares to enter the White House, it should also sound like our possible future.

Every signal we have from the president-elect points to an administration defined by three core tenets: white supremacy, unprecedented corporate influence and an uptick in state violence. Aside from climate catastrophe, the result could be a disturbing and dystopian new normal, where episodes like the one unfolding in Standing Rock become all too common.

The signs aren’t hard to spot. Breitbart News head Stephen Bannon will be chief strategist. Jeff Sessions could be attorney general, with a resume that includes a battle against the 14th amendment and joking about the Ku Klux Klan. Beating up protesters was a regular fixture of Trump rallies, and one surrogate recently referenced internment camps as a precedent for how the Trump administration might deal with Muslim Americans.

As with Trump’s fledgling regime, the notion that certain lives don’t matter is also at the core of the Dakota Access pipeline. At one point slated to run just north of Bismarck, Energy Transfer Partners rerouted the project away from the overwhelmingly white city due to concerns about the threat it might pose to water supplies there. Of course we can’t know exactly what ETP’s motivations were in this case, but other fossil fuel companies have a long history of treating indigenous and poor communities – overwhelming black and brown neighborhoods – as sacrificial zones, where they can hide their toxic externalities and keep profits flowing in at full speed.

Trump hopes to streamline that process, and has invested heavily in two of the companies behind the pipeline, Phillips 66 and ETP. Company CEO Kelcy Warren gave more than $100,000 to the president elect through the campaign. (Warren has since relayed that he was “very enthusiastic about what’s going to happen with our country”.) Fossil fuel executives could reign over the Department of Energy. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon was floated as an option to run the Treasury. The US Chamber of Commerce is feeling optimistic, and so is Bloomberg Businessweek, whose cover this week invited readers to “Cheer up! Business is going to be great.”

While he ran a populist candidacy, Trump is building a cabinet for the 1%. If his history of dealing with protests is any indication, he’ll protect their interests – his interests – by force. At campaign events, when interrupted by protesters, Trump reminisced about the “good old days”, when “this doesn’t happen because they used to treat them very, very rough”. Come January, he’ll be commander-in-chief, potentially with a man who called Black Lives Matter an “enemy within our borders” by his side as secretary of homeland security. With the national guard already in Standing Rock, what comes next – in North Dakota and elsewhere – could be far more brutal than what water protectors have faced.

Standing Rock has for months been a frontline in the fights for indigenous sovereignty and against reckless extraction. It may also now be the frontline of Trump’s America. Anyone looking for clues about what the next four years could entail should be paying close attention to the battle over the Dakota Access pipeline – and doing everything in their power to support it.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: Police Are Deliberately Hurting Standing Rock Protesters to Deter Others From Coming, Father of Injured Protester Claims Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=35143"><span class="small">Paul Gottinger, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Wednesday, 23 November 2016 11:26

Gottinger writes: "The police have changed the story of how Sophia Wilansky was hurt three times, according to her father. He also said police are intentionally hurting people in an attempt to deter new protesters from joining those already at Standing Rock."

Police use a water cannon on Standing Rock protesters on Monday November 21, 2016. (photo: Stephanie Keith/Reuters)
Police use a water cannon on Standing Rock protesters on Monday November 21, 2016. (photo: Stephanie Keith/Reuters)


Police Are Deliberately Hurting Standing Rock Protesters to Deter Others From Coming, Father of Injured Protester Claims

By Paul Gottinger, Reader Supported News

23 November 16

 

few hundred people gathered for a prayer vigil Tuesday evening outside the Minneapolis hospital where 21-year-old Sophia Wilansky was recovering from her injury at Standing Rock.

Witnesses say her arm was severely damaged when an officer pulled the pin on a stun grenade, and held it, then timed the throw so the grenade would explode exactly as it hit her. Witnesses say the police threw the grenade directly at Ms. Wilansky as she was backing away from the police. The grenade explosion caused bone, muscles and arteries to be blown from her arm, according to her father, Wayne Wilansky.

Ms. Wilansky was airlifted to a Minneapolis hospital, where she has undergone multiple surgeries to save her arm, though it’s not yet clear whether doctors will need to amputate. Wayne Wilansky said his daughter may need up to 20 surgeries, and if she keeps her arm it will have very minor functionality.

Mr. Wilansky says FBI agents, including a representative from the Joint Terrorism Task Force, kept his daughter prisoner inside her hospital room yesterday. The agents didn’t say why they were there for hours, but they eventually collected his daughter’s clothing. Mr. Wilansky says he reached a verbal agreement with the FBI that they will give the Wilansky family access to the clothing to forensically test it themselves.

Police have denied responsibility for the injury to Ms. Wilansky, but her father said, “My daughter, who was completely conscious, says that they threw a grenade right at her.” Multiple witnesses also say Ms. Wilansky was injured due to a police grenade.

Mr. Wilansky continued, “I spoke to the surgeon myself directly. They took shrapnel out of her arm, so it’s pretty clear that it’s a grenade and they're going to save that shrapnel. It's going to stay in pathology until it's needed. There's proof. There's evidence that our government is throwing grenades at our people who are there peacefully protesting."

The police have changed the story of how Ms. Wilansky was hurt three times, according to her father. He also said police are intentionally hurting people in an attempt to deter new protesters from joining those already at Standing Rock.

“It’s unbelievable that governments are violently attacking citizens who are there peacefully in an attempt not to control the protest, not to protect property, but to potentially damage people, to hurt people on purpose so that other people won’t come.”

The authorities blocked medical help from reaching injured protesters, according to Mr. Wilansky.

“They are intentionally blocking ambulances from getting to the site. One of the things that hampered [my daughter’s] healing process was that it took her 6 to 8 hours to get to a hospital where they could do this kind of surgery. [Ambulances] don’t have any access to the roads. They stopped people from getting through.”

Despite her injury, Ms. Wilansky has asked that the attention be kept on the people of Standing Rock.

“Sophia said please go out there and say it’s not about me, it’s about the indigenous peoples. Even though she’s lying there with her arm pretty much blown off, she’s focused on the fact that it’s not about her. It’s about what we’re doing to our country and what we’re doing to the native peoples and what we’re doing to our environment,” her father said.

The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe has been fighting to stop the 1,170 mile Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) for seven months.

DAPL is planned to go under the Missouri River just a half-mile north of the Standing Rock reservation. The pipeline would cross culturally significant areas, and any spill would have a devastating impact on the reservation’s water. The reservation already faces significant issues, including rates of unemployment, poverty, overcrowded housing, premature deaths, and a suicide rate that are all much higher than the national average.

Thousands of supporters have come to the Sacred Stone camp at Standing Rock to act as “Water Protectors” in an attempt to help the Standing Rock Tribe stop the pipeline.

One protester who spoke at the vigil had just returned from Standing Rock and said that police were firing directly at protesters who were posing no threat to law enforcement or to property. He held up a blue sponge round and said, “This is what I get for trying to take a selfie near the police line.”

Activists at Standing Rock have described police firing these sponge rounds at protesters’ faces and heads.

Mr. Wilansky blamed the governor of North Dakota, Jack Dalrymple, law enforcement, and the National Guard for his daughter’s injury. He also asked for everyone to call their local and federal representatives to say the violence towards protesters at Standing Rock must end.

“Everyone has to just say no, we can’t be throwing grenades at people who are peacefully protesting, singing, and chanting and supporting our indigenous nations. This is not the way we behave. This is not Afghanistan and Iraq. We don’t throw grenades at people.”

Mr. Wilansky said that Obama needed to intervene to stop the police attacks on protesters.

“Even president Obama, who I love, said three weeks ago, ‘We’ll wait and see.’ What is there to wait and see? People will die if the situation isn’t stopped.”

Ms. Wilansky’s injury is far from the first injury caused by a “non-lethal” police grenade. Police officers have lost their hand or been killed by mishandling the grenades. Victims have also experienced “bone deep” burns, smoke inhalation, loss of fingers, and even death.

The activist media outlet Unicorn Riot has collected fragments of the different types of grenades that police are firing at Standing Rock protesters.



Paul Gottinger is a staff reporter at RSN whose work focuses on the Middle East and the arms industry. He can be reached on Twitter @paulgottinger or via email.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
War Has Broken Out in North Dakota Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=63"><span class="small">Marc Ash, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Wednesday, 23 November 2016 09:37

Ash writes: "The situation in North Dakota at the site of the Dakota Access Pipeline has degenerated into what can now only fairly be described as a war zone. The escalating assaults on unarmed protesters by heavily armed, fully militarized police units have transformed the Dakota Access Pipeline construction site into a battlefield."

A water defender stands in defiance of a fully militarized North Dakota law enforcement battalion at the site of the Dakota Access Pipeline construction project. (photo: COUNTERCURRENTNEWS)
A water defender stands in defiance of a fully militarized North Dakota law enforcement battalion at the site of the Dakota Access Pipeline construction project. (photo: COUNTERCURRENTNEWS)


War Has Broken Out in North Dakota

By Marc Ash, Reader Supported News

23 November 16

 

he situation in North Dakota at the site of the Dakota Access Pipeline has degenerated into what can now only fairly be described as a war zone.

The escalating assaults on unarmed protesters by heavily armed, fully militarized police units have transformed the Dakota Access Pipeline construction site into a battlefield.

Scores of people have been injured and medics are struggling to evacuate the injured to area medical facilities for treatment. The scene is one of constant clashes and assaults by North Dakota military police attempting to drive Native American protesters away from the pipeline construction site.

A flashpoint on the Backwater Bridge was the scene of an intense six-hour engagement between “Water Defender” protesters and Morton County, North Dakota, sheriff’s personnel.

Using military tactics, law enforcement unleashed barrage after barrage of military grade tear gas, rubber bullets, water sprayed from high-pressure hoses in below freezing temperatures, and concussion grenades. According to the ACLU, “News reports confirm more than 300 people have been injured.”

The worst injury reported occurred as a result of a concussion grenade thrown by police directly striking a 21-year-old protester from New York. Sophia Wilansky suffered severe damage to her arm when the grenade detonated in close proximity. The injury caused a compound fracture and extensive damage to muscle, nerve and bone, resulting certainly in a lifelong disability. Details of the Wilansky incident have gone viral on Twitter.

With hostilities and injuries mounting, President Obama is taking a disturbingly hands-off approach. In an interview with NowThis News on November 2nd, Obama appeared detached from the severity of the conflict playing out in North Dakota, saying at the time, “We’re going to let it play out for several more weeks.”

Indeed, in several more weeks he will no longer be president. So it is entirely possible that he intends to take no further action and hand the situation off to President-elect Donald Trump’s administration. Leaving behind a raging conflict and … a fitting legacy to his indefensible and disaster-prone energy policy.

It’s not clear what Obama’s interest in seeing this pipeline built is, or what kind of commitments he has made regarding its completion, but as a brutal conflict unfolds on American soil he remains eerily silent.

What deepens the concern in this conflict is that it hearkens back to the darkest days of America’s past. The sight of white men with weapons attacking Native Americans defending sacred lands is a return to America’s genocide, and Native America’s holocaust.

The oil wars are not “over there” any longer. They are here, and the Standing Rock Sioux Indian Reservation is the first great battlefield. It is that and a resumption of America’s Indian wars.


Marc Ash is the founder and former Executive Director of Truthout, and is now founder and Editor of Reader Supported News.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
'Are Jews People' Was an Actual, Real Discussion Topic on CNN Print
Wednesday, 23 November 2016 09:26

Nickalls writes: "I am Jewish, but am I human? Sounds like a pretty ridiculous question, but apparently, it's not in 2016. That's right: A very real CNN chyron on Monday afternoon read 'Alt-Right Founder Questions If Jews are People.'"

CNN. (photo: Twitter/Maia Efrem)
CNN. (photo: Twitter/Maia Efrem)


ALSO SEE: TV Pundits Eager
to Make Trump the New 'Normal'

'Are Jews People' Was an Actual, Real Discussion Topic on CNN

By Sammy Nickalls, Esquire

23 November 16

 

Is this Trump's America?

am Jewish, but am I human? Sounds like a pretty ridiculous question, but apparently, it's not in 2016. That's right: A very real CNN chyron (TV news lingo for headline on the lower part of the screen) on Monday afternoon read "Alt-Right Founder Questions If Jews are People."

Nope, it's not a Clickhole headline. And what's even worse? The conversation went on for several minutes, as if Trump denouncing neo-Nazis is a political risk of some kind. Additionally, CNN made the entire issue even more egregious by inflaming the issue with an extreme headline that used "alt-right founder" instead of "supremacist."

In the segment, CNN Host Jim Sciutto discussed with political commentators whether Trump should formally denounce supporters from the alt-right. Specifically, they were talking about the National Policy Institute's Richard Spencer, who came up with the term "alt-right" to describe what pretty much amounts to white supremacists and neo-Nazis. Sciutto read the following Spencer quote: "One wonders if these people are people at all, or instead soulless golem."

It's important to note that while Spencer is, indeed, an anti-Semite, this quote in particular was not technically about whether Jews are people. Instead, he was asking whether media figures denouncing Trump are people, or if they were soulless golems created by the Jews. A golem, by the way, is a creature created by a rabbi in a Jewish folktale meant to protect Jews from anti-Semites, so yeah, his quote is still pretty terrible—as was CNN's dancing around the topic.

Is this what the next four years will look like?

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 Next > End >>

Page 1820 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN