As we reported back on March 12, Garry Trudeau has done it again. The intrepid comic strip author has ventured into forbidden political territory once more, and is banned by many publications again. Here is Part 4 of the banned Doonesbury Abortion Cartoon. -- ma/RSN
The banned Doonesbury Abortion Cartoon: Part 4. (image: Universal Uclick)
The Banned Doonesbury Abortion Cartoon:
Part 4
22 March 12
As we reported back on March 12, Garry Trudeau has done it again. The intrepid comic strip author has ventured into forbidden political territory once more, and is banned by many publications again. Here is Part 4 of the banned Doonesbury Abortion Cartoon. -- ma/RSN

Doonesbury's banned abortion series: Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | Day 6
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Is there anyne out there who STILL thinks that 's a good law, or even a harmless law? It's the most offensive, outrageous, insulting law I've ever heard of.
Every lawmaker who supported or in future supports such a law ought to have to first undergo a transrectal ultrasound just so he really comprehends what's going to be done to women.
Under what flat rock is the AMA hiding these days, by the way?
RSN: Can you fix us up a link so we can send all four panels of Mr Trudeau's excellent work to everyone we know in one shot? Every American ought to see this one.
Why? The ones who need it most wouldn't be able to read it, and if they could they would be shouting "Right on!"
Those who have not, please read Margaret Atwood's novel, "The Handmaid's Tale." It is a grotesque horror story about the dehumanization of women by so-called "religious" lunatics-- and it's WAY too close to where we are.
aaaaaaaaoh yes, I agree. You design - I'll print.
Oh, jeez, he cain't read, now can he?
would have perforated a virgin, if
the Virgin Mary had decided to abort Jesus in Texas.
Apparently MANY women heartily support what MRs are doing & millions of others don't care enough to take about 30min/year to register/vote, let alone organize,volunt eer, contribute. I wish Gary would focus his powerful pen on those for a few strips. Some people vote-win; some people whine-lose. Democracy.
What's REALLY in "bad taste" is ANY State that would Mandate this kind of NEEDLESS, invasive procedure SOLELY for the purpose of discouraging and shaming the Patient seeking this Perfectly LEGAL procedure! These things should be decided by the Patient and her Physician, NOT some Bible thumping Fanatical, Nazi/Fascist Politician with an ax to grind! Considering the fact that the MAJORITY of the population is Female, the ReTHUGlicans are shooting themselves in the head on this one! Remember, dear Folks and Vote the Fanatics OUT in November! The People, UNITED, will NEVER be defeated!
I wish you'd be concerned about the bad taste of women being forced to submit to a wand being stuck in them--and it's not in our mouths or ears.
Do you think women are so used to this kind of violation that it doesn't matter to them? Humiliation of women is ok? Think.
How would you like to be forced to bend over and have someone shove something into the place where the sun doesn't usually shine? Think. Where are your family values?
Transvaginal ultrasound.
It's all the rage.
This must be especially traumatizing for a woman who has been sexually assaulted. I could see a forced transvaginal ultrasound triggering episodes of PTSD.
We won't ask you to leave because we don't want you here. It is your right to be here.
But, we WILL give you red marks. Lots and lots of red marks.
Since a) women have the right to choose abortion and b) over-the-belly ultrasound is quite adequate for any woman who wants to know how far along she is, this newly-mandated procedure is truly just for SHAMING women, humiliating and embarrassing them, and making them associate sex with pain and horror.
Truly, The Handmaid's Tale is just around the corner if we don't fight these kinds of laws.
CHINASKI: "Texas should be dropped on Texas."
==========
Now THAT'S funny! I haven't laughed out loud like that in too long! I agree with another reader: where is the AMA in all of this? More to the point, where are the thousands of doctors signing a notice of intent -- either Texas gets OUT of their freakin' examination rooms or the doctors will be getting OUT of Texas?
==========
Come on all you MDs . . . with all your medical training, you shouldn't have too much trouble locating your own spine? And once you find that, you male doctors can move straight down -- just a little bit lower -- and find those two things hanging there which used to mean something! Stand up! Don't let these pussbrains rule over you! Give 'em the antibiotic they clearly NEED!
==========
sail4free
==========
One small eror: The US probe used is about the diameter of a tampon (I've had one in my rectum on several occasions to scan my prosate). In this Texas case, it is, as intended by the legislators, demeaning, and insulting.
But it's not painful.
Don't take my word for it. Ask any woman who uses tampons.
or
Ask any woman who, in the course of evaluating a GYN problem, or, as part of routine OB care has had pain from the US.
It's not the physical pain. It's the MCPs who hurt--all of us, male and female.
ps I have bad herorrhoids, but the probe is quite small enough to not hurt them.
Maybe the probe used for the rectum is as small as a tampon, but I've had a trans vaginal ultra sound and believe me it's not that small. It's easily double that size. No less than 6 to 7 inches long and easily double the diameter of an average tampon. I've seen vibrators smaller than these ultrasound wands they intend to use on women.
THAT'S OBVIOUS.
DOES NOT EVERY DOCTOR GET PAID FOR EVERY CONSULTATION AND EXAMINATION - OFTEN BY INSURANCE?
EVEN OBAMACARE?
FOLLOW THE MONEY.
THEY'RE ALL IN BED TOGETHER AND GETTING PAID FOR OTHER PEOPLE'S SEX?
OH, THE IRONY (AND THE BANK BALANCE - OF COURSE)!
Regardless of the pain level, I think it is a form shame. It's an unnecessary procedure done to make the woman feel guilty.
RSS feed for comments to this post