RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Nice, Munich and the Terrorism of the West Print
Wednesday, 27 July 2016 08:21

Fernandez writes: "Eighty-four lives lost in Nice is an atrocity of extreme proportions, no doubt. But what of the estimated half a million Iraqi children wiped out via US sanctions in the 1990s, before we even got down to serious business via the war on terror?"

French police officers in the Urban Supervisory Control Centre (CSU) in Nice, southeastern France, 26 April 2016. (photo: AFP)
French police officers in the Urban Supervisory Control Centre (CSU) in Nice, southeastern France, 26 April 2016. (photo: AFP)


Nice, Munich and the Terrorism of the West

By Belen Fernandez, Middle East Eye

27 July 16

 

rom my base in southern Italy this month, I got to experience Italian television coverage of the aftermath of the 14 July lorry attack in Nice, France, that killed 84 people.

Predictably, coverage entailed headlines like “Islamic Terrorism Everywhere”, which prompted Italians in my midst to unleash lively Muslim-directed curses involving references to various human anatomy and to hyperventilate about how in Europe it was no longer possible to even walk outside without being blown up or otherwise Islamically terrorised.

In certain other parts of the world, of course, it has for years often been a crapshoot of sorts to walk outside - or engage in any number of other mundane activities like playing football, attending weddings, attending funerals, sleeping - without attracting the attention of projectiles belonging to the United States or Israel, to name two of the top offenders.

It bears mentioning, on this front, that Italy is itself no minor accomplice to global killing patterns given its service as loyal military ally of the US and launching pad for drone missions. But terrorism by drone doesn’t factor into Eurocentric concerns.

Following the Nice attack, Italian TV not only less-than-subtly transmitted the message that Islam is in fact the problem; news reports also zoomed in repeatedly on the identity card of attacker Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel to give viewers an up-close-and-personal view of the latest face of terror, of concentrated evil.

What the combination of the general Islamic-terror-everywhere narrative and the zoomed-in, spotlighted individual brown face does is to endow certain physiognomies with a fundamental terrorist essence. It’s an approach that is far from unique to the Italian media, and that simply begs for ever more enhanced racial profiling and xenophobia.

This is not, obviously, to put forth some absurd argument according to which images of such attackers shouldn’t be disseminated. Rather, it is to point out that the singular victimisation, vilification and hysteria that attend such attacks in the West don’t gel with reality. Where are the zoomed-in identity cards of, for example, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, or Benjamin Netanyahu, so that we might excruciatingly scrutinise them for clues as to how these characters became sociopathic killers?

Not to make light of the terrible and tragic attack in Nice, of course, but it is presumably no more terrible to have one’s body levelled by a lorry than to have it blasted to smithereens by American and/or Israeli munitions. The latter variety of slaughter will, however, continued to be justified on account of the fact that it is conducted by the ostensibly legitimate military and security forces of recognised states, their sociopathic credentials notwithstanding.

Moral of the story: if you happen to exist in the vicinity of Arab/Muslim formations, you’re legitimate collateral damage - and you don’t stand a chance of being humanised post-mortem in the fashion of the Nice victims. In fact, it’s unlikely that even an iota of your history as a human being on this earth will be permitted to cross the threshold of Western consciousness.

Eighty-four lives lost in Nice is an atrocity of extreme proportions, no doubt. But what of the estimated half a million Iraqi children wiped out via US sanctions in the 1990s, before we even got down to serious business via the war on terror? Back in 1996, then-US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright was asked by television journalist Lesley Stahl for her thoughts on the sanctions that had killed “more children than died in Hiroshima”.

Albright’s opinion: “[W]e think the price is worth it.”

To be sure, half a million gradually extinguished young lives is not as conducive to media sensationalism as a rampaging lorry in France that spontaneously extinguishes 84. But still, where is Albright’s zoomed-in identity card? Where is the ID card of former US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who lauded the carnage of Israel’s 2006 war on Lebanon - in which some 1,200 people were obliterated - as the “birth pangs of a new Middle East”?

Why don’t CIA-orchestrated car bombs that kill more than 80 people in Beirut qualify as terrorism or at least a global tragedy, but vehicles that kill more than 80 people in France do?

It has already become tiresome to point out the institutionalised hypocrisy and discrepancies, but there’s not exactly an alternative - particularly when the very function of the Western establishment media is to fuel an anti-intellectual, anti-analytical, anti-empathetic approach to current events that furthers the political aims of dominant powers.

In the aftermath of the recent shooting at a Munich shopping centre, in which nine persons were killed, the Italian media were true to form - as were media counterparts across the West.

Watching coverage of the attack from southern Italy, I was repeatedly informed by the television set that, although there was no evidence whatsoever that this was an instance of “Islamic terror”, there was no discounting the fact that it at least resembled an instance of Islamic terror.

In other words, it doesn’t matter who the attacker is or what the precise circumstances are - everyone should still engage in one big anti-Muslim freak-out session. Which naturally serves to validate further punitively racist measures at home and lethally racist measures abroad.

In the end, it’s safe to say that there is indeed “TERRORISM EVERYWHERE” - and that the media helps to propagate it.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Bernie Should Take the Anti-Christ's Advice Print
Tuesday, 26 July 2016 14:46

Palest writes: "Bernie's campaign is just beginning. No kidding. The real campaign. The one he was chosen for."

Bernie Sanders addresses the Democratic National Convention. (photo: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)
Bernie Sanders addresses the Democratic National Convention. (photo: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)


Bernie Should Take the Anti-Christ's Advice

By Greg Palast, Greg Palast's Website

26 July 16

 

Note: If you’re in Philadelphia, I will preview my new film, “The Best Democracy Money Can Buy—a Tale of Billionaires & Ballot Bandits” this Wednesday, in FDR Park on the huge Jumbotrons around the main stage. Learn how they will try to steal the election before they steal it; and meet the billionaire bandit behind Donald Trump. I track down the evidence with help from “detectives” Ice-T and Richard Belzer, a stoner with a guitar named Willie Nelson, and divergent angels, Shailene Woodley and Rosario Dawson.]

ernie's campaign is just beginning. No kidding. The real campaign. The one he was chosen for.

I got this idea of what Bernie and Berners should do from Satan, from the Anti-Christ. Or, as you might know him from television, the Reverend Pat Robertson. That’s correct: the berzerko right wing televangelist – and one of the most brilliant men I've ever met.

Years ago, the Guardian asked me to investigate Rev. Pat’s diabolical plan to create the first web-only bank. (The goofy bank caper was foiled when The Guardian reported on his less-than-savory financial dealings that would likely disqualify him from getting a bank charter.)

When I visited The Reverend at his TV studio in Virginia Beach, I reminded him that, when he ran for President in 1988, he claimed that God himself had told him to run. My question: With a campaign manager like that, how come he lost?

Robertson’s answer: “The Lord did not tell me to win. He told me to run.”

As Robertson and his minions explained it, the race gave him a list of three million names, addresses, phone numbers – and millions in non-stop donations. From that list of believers and their bodies and checkbooks, Robertson created the fearsome Christian Coalition. And for two decades, no one could run for dogcatcher on the Republican line without the endorsement of Reverend Pat’s Christian Coalition.

If a diabolical voice called forth Pat Robertson, I'm certain the better a of our nature called forth Bernie not for a political moment but to create a political movement.

Unless he's been fooling us, Sanders himself has always said his campaign’s moral purpose was not to win the nomination (and surely he must have known the DNC couldn’t permit that), it was all about a revolution.

Now is the time to create that revolutionary movement that Sanders claimed, correctly, could be more powerful than a mere President.

It would be a terrible, terrible waste for the Sanders movement to make its goal some instantly forgotten lines in the Democratic Party platform. (Does anyone remember the 2012 Platform’s position on minimum wage?)

A Sanders permanent organization could turn American politics toward the sun. He could lead a real political revolution more important than winning the California primary.

I’d call it the Un-Christian Coalition—though I suspect there’s a better name out there.

I don't, as a journalist, ever endorse candidates. But one can’t ignore the movement his candidacy has engendered. It would be a tragedy for our nation if this non-violent insurgency of young people simply floated away because of electoral politics du jour.

I am now in Philadelphia covering that hot bag of noxious political fossil fuel exhaust known as the Democratic Convention. I get to witness a circus of craven, ambition and obnoxious marketing of candidates whose slogan is, let’s face it, “I’m not as evil as that other guy.”

In the union movement, we used to say, “Don’t mourn, organize!”

Now, imagine if, next year, a Sanders Un-Christian Coalition, made up of 8 million voters, announced that it will throw its endorsement to the Green Party in the midterms if a President Clinton suddenly decides that the Trans-Pacific trade deal is now acceptable.

Imagine if the future Sanders’ organization could, echoing the Christian Coalition’s takeover of the GOP, push progressive Dems over the top in key Congressional races – and mount primaries against those corporatist trogs in the Democratic Party who refuse to re-regulate banks.

To win over Sanders’ voters, Hillary Clinton made an awful lot of promises. Assuming she’s elected, crowds of thousands should dog her every step until she delivers: removing the cap on income tax for social security, opening up Medicare to those 50 to 65 (quickly, please!), cutting student debt to public universities – and restoring the Voting Rights Act though her Court appointees.

If she doesn’t produce, the organization is there to kick the legs out from under the campaigns of the banksters’ Democrat stooges.

Clinton ran a campaign that basically sneered at idealism. It was the vice-principal telling us, “You can’t do that” – you can’t have universal health care, you can’t have low-cost education, you can’t bust up the banks. A permanent coalition of Bernie activists will quickly turn that sneer into fear.

Because if there’s one thing a politician hates more than full disclosure of their donors, it’s an informed, organized, and activated voter. Especially one multiplied by a million. Just ask Reverend Pat.



Greg Palast (Rolling Stone, Guardian, BBC) is the author of The New York Times bestsellers, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy and Billionaires & Ballot Bandits, which will be released as a feature documentary movie The Best Democracy Money Can Buy – A Tale of Billionaires & Ballot Bandits this fall. Get your name in the movie credits! The Deadline has been extended to July 30.

Check for Movie Screenings in your area.

Visit the Palast Investigative Fund store or simply make a tax-deductible contribution to keep our work alive!

Or support the The Palast Investigative Fund (a project of The Sustainable Markets Foundation) by shopping with Amazon Smile.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The WNBA's Black Lives Matter Protest Has Set a New Standard for Sports Activism Print
Tuesday, 26 July 2016 14:36

Cauterucci writes: "This month, the WNBA has become the site of one of the most united, persistent political statements in sports history."

WNBA players wearing T-shirts in support of Black Lives Matter. (photo: AP)
WNBA players wearing T-shirts in support of Black Lives Matter. (photo: AP)


The WNBA's Black Lives Matter Protest Has Set a New Standard for Sports Activism

By Christina Cauterucci, Slate

26 July 16

 

his month, the WNBA has become the site of one of the most united, persistent political statements in sports history. In recent weeks, entire teams and their owners have come out in support of the Black Lives Matters movement, and their sustained protest effort has forced the league to back off the fines it charged players who used their warm-up outfits to stake ground against racism and police brutality.

It started on July 9, when members of the Minnesota Lynx showed up at a game in warm-up shirts printed with “Black Lives Matter,” the phrases “Change Starts With Us” and “Justice and Accountability,” an image of the Dallas police shield, and the names of Alton Sterling and Philando Castile, black men killed by police officers that week. (Castile lived, worked, went to college, and died in Minnesota.)

The next day, during warm-ups before a game, the New York Liberty wore black T-shirts that said “#BlackLivesMatter” and “#Dallas5.” In the following weeks, players on the Liberty, the Indiana Fever, and the Phoenix Mercury wore plain black shirts by Adidas, the WNBA’s attire sponsor, for several game warm-ups in an attempt to continue their political statement without violating a rule that require player to wear standard warm-up outfits that bear their teams’ logos.

The WNBA wasn’t having it. Last week, the league fined the Fever, Liberty, and Mercury $5,000 each and fined each player on those teams $500 for wearing the black shirts. Since the Lynx players stopped wearing their shirts after the July 9 game, when the WNBA sent them a memo warning them of an impending fine, they were spared. ESPN reports that a standard uniform violation fine is $200.

Since the fines were announced, the players’ protests have gathered steam and deeper consequence. On Thursday, the Liberty’s Tina Charles accepted a Player of the Month award with her warm-up outfit inside out. In an Instagram post, she castigated the league for supporting “Breast Cancer Awareness, Pride and other subject matters” while attempting to silence players in a majority-black league on issues related to racism. The Liberty, Fever, and the Washington Mystics have all refused to answer reporters’ post-game questions unless they relate to the Black Lives Matter movement or other social issues. On Friday, players from the Lynx and the Seattle Storm tweeted photos of the teams in black shirts, though they refrained from wearing them on-court to avoid a fine. The Mystics wore “Black Lives Matter” shirts in the locker room after their Friday game.

Mystics guard Natasha Cloud told USA Today that the team’s media blackout would last “until we get support” from the WNBA. “We definitely wanted to show our support for those teams that did get fined for wearing just plain black Adidas shirts,” she said. “We’re allowed to wear whatever we want to the games, to and from the games, so if they’re going to take away our right and our voice to advocate for something so important to 70 percent of the league which is African American, we’ll find other ways to do it and other ways to do it.”

“We want to be able to use our platforms; we want to be able to use our voices,” said Liberty guard Tanisha Wright to reporters after Thursday’s game. “We don’t want to let anybody silence us.” (Wright spoke more about the league’s protests on this week’s episode of Hang Up and Listen.)

The teams’ protests had swift impact. WNBA President Lisa Borders announced on Saturday that the she would cancel the fines the league had imposed on the players and teams. “Appreciate our players expressing themselves on matters important to them,” she tweeted. “Rescinding imposed fines to show them even more support.”

But the WNBA’s actions are remarkable and commendable for more than just their immediate effects. Rarely have so many players and teams in a league stood together across racial lines on a matter of social import. Several NBA players, including the entire L.A. Lakers team, wore “I Can’t Breathe” shirts in memory of Eric Garner in 2014, but it never spread to half the league, as the WNBA’s stand for racial justice has. (For what it’s worth, the NBA did not fine those players for their actions.)

Many contemporary athletes have spoken to the history of social activism in professional sports. At this month’s ESPY awards, NBA stars Carmelo Anthony, Chris Paul, Dwyane Wade, and LeBron James located their support for the Black Lives Matter movement within the tradition of forebears like Jesse Owens, Billie Jean King, Jackie Robinson, and Muhammad Ali. “It's not about being a role model,” said James. “Let's use this moment as a call to action to all professional athletes to educate ourselves, explore these issues, speak up, use our influence, and renounce all violence. And most importantly go back to our communities. Invest our time, our resources. Help rebuild them. Help strengthen them.”

Cleveland Browns wide receiver Andrew Hawkins believes that, since racism keeps most people of color out of the upper echelons of power, those who make it to the top of one of the only majority-minority industries—pro sports—have a special privilege and responsibility. Hawkins has been speaking about racial justice since at least 2014, when he wore a T-shirt onto the field promoting “justice for Tamir Rice and John Crawford III.” “I think it’s something bigger than sports,” he recently told Slate. “These athletes are some of the only people of color that are given this platform that can really truly raise awareness.”

In the case of the WNBA, players risked professional and financial backlash to make their statement. When the Lynx wore their shirts at the July 9 game, four off-duty cops who were hired as arena security personnel left their posts. “I commend [the cops] for it,” the president of the Minneapolis Police Federation, the officers’ union, told the Star Tribune. “If [the players] are going to keep their stance, all officers may refuse to work there.” He added, “They only have four officers working the event because the Lynx have such a pathetic draw.” The league’s protests might have stopped there. Instead, players of all races let criticism and the threat of fines fuel their determination to display a united front. As athletes, they’re setting a new standard for what sports figures can do to support political movements. As activists, though the movement continues, they’ve already won.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
What It Feels Like to Be an Autistic Person of Color in the Eyes of the Police Print
Tuesday, 26 July 2016 14:33

Garcia writes: "Hearing cops say they hadn't meant to shoot the black man, but the autistic one, hit close to home. I feel less secure than white people with autism and less secure than my friends of color who are neurotypical."

Police in riot gear. (photo: Brigette Supernova/The Daily Beast)
Police in riot gear. (photo: Brigette Supernova/The Daily Beast)


What It Feels Like to Be an Autistic Person of Color in the Eyes of the Police

By Eric Garcia, The Daily Beast

26 July 16

 

I live in a world that fears my skin color and doesn’t want to understand how my brain works.

n the summer of 2013, I was a student reporter interviewing lawmakers and jotting down notes on my laptop in the gallery of the North Carolina state Senate when a man told me he needed to look inside my backpack, as a security measure. Not wanting the hassle of unloading, I left and headed downstairs to continue working.

But as I was interviewing lawmakers, two uniformed security officers asked me what I was doing there. With only my student identification and ID card from California, which was where my family lives, it took quite some time to explain that I was working there and I felt dread and fear as a Latino autistic man who was suddenly the focus of law enforcement’s attention.

Those feelings returned when I watched the video showing Charles Kinsey, an unarmed black man and behavioral therapist in North Miami on the ground, with his hands up, trying to make sure police pointing guns and shouting orders didn’t shoot his charge, a man with autism sitting on the ground playing with a toy truck.

One of the officers did shoot Kinsey, and my dread and fear were magnified later when the Miami Police Benevolent Association said the officers were there because neighbors had called saying Kinsey’s patient had a gun.  (He did not.) The association said the officer had meant to shoot the autistic man, whom he thought was somehow endangering Kinsey, and hit Kinsey by mistake.

Hearing cops say they hadn’t meant to shoot the black man, but the autistic one, hit close to home. I feel less secure than white people with autism and less secure than my friends of color who are neurotypical.

In a way, the police using an autistic person as an alibi makes sense. A recent white paper released by the Ruderman Family Foundation showed that up to half of all people killed by police are disabled and a medical condition or “mental illness” is used to blame victims for their own deaths. On top of that, 80 percent of all cases involving disability are labeled mental illness.

It shows how dispensable people with autism are, said Morénike Giwa-Onaiwu, chair of the autism and ethnicity committee of the Autism Women’s Network.

Along with being on the spectrum herself, Giwa-Onaiwu’s two youngest children, 5 and 7, have autism. When she disciplines them, they may stiffen up or engage in self-stimulative behavior, known as stimming, which is common among people with autism.

“That’s in a setting where they are sort of at ease,” she said. “Much less when it’s in a heightened situation where there’s police involved,” since many people on the spectrum have difficulty with sensory processing and overload. And even if they succeed in stimming to calm themselves down, that behavior can be alarming to officers even though it is a normal part of being autistic.

Finn Gardiner, Boston community coordinator for the Autistic Self-Advocacy Network, recalled the time he was stopped at a pharmacy in San Francisco when an employee called the police on him while he was waiting for a prescription.

“They saw a black man in a hoodie,” he said. Gardiner said run-ins with the police could also add additional stress and sensory overload because they come with sirens. There is also the additional danger given that 20 to 30 percent of children with autism develop epilepsy by adulthood.

The concerns about autistic people and police are so bad that Ron Hampton, who has a son with autism and is president of the D.C. Autism Society, says that “when our children have episodes we call each other,” not police. That’s especially damning considering Hampton himself was a police officer for 24 years, but knows better than to involve them with autistic children.

It is almost impossible to know how often autistic people of color are subject to police violence because—while the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that 1 in 68 children in the United States have been identified as having an autism spectrum disorder—there is yet no such survey of how many adults in the U.S. are on the spectrum.

On top of this, studies show that African-American children with autism are likely to be identified later than their white counterparts, and Latinos were less likely to be diagnosed than other kids.

Often, said Rebecca Cokley, executive director at the National Council on Disability, children of color are misdiagnosed with a behavioral disorder.

Despite the fact I live independently and have accepting employers and friends, as an adult who knows I am on the spectrum, I continue to live with the dread and fear of being misunderstood even as a professional journalist now writing for a publication like Roll Call.

Just last month, I was covering Republicans for my publication’s congressional baseball game at Washington Nationals Park and was given a credential with the wrong name on it. As a result, I was escorted by security officials to a basement area of the stadium and had to wait for the vice president of my company to vouch for me. I disclosed I am on the autism spectrum to let them know I was trying to comply and understand from their perspective that an uncredentialed person was near members of Congress.

Most of the officers were gracious, except for one who made a sarcastic joke that if things didn’t work out, they would tackle me.

Again, things worked out and I went on with my work. No damage done except a reminder of all the things that can go wrong in a world that fears my skin color and doesn’t to understand how my brain works.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: Torture Is Alive and Well in America's Prisons Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=36478"><span class="small">John Kiriakou, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Tuesday, 26 July 2016 13:18

Kiriakou writes: "Would you believe a uniformed law enforcement officer or a mentally ill homeless man? The guards got away with it. Across the country, prison guards get away with things like this every day."

Prisoner behind bars. (photo: Getty)
Prisoner behind bars. (photo: Getty)


Torture Is Alive and Well in America's Prisons

By John Kiriakou, Reader Supported News

26 July 16

 

ast month, I wrote about the terrible conditions mentally ill inmates face in prisons and jails across America, compounded by cruel and oppressive conditions in so-called suicide watch cells (Department of Retribution: Torturing the Mentally Ill). I relayed the experiences of an inmate at the Pamunkey Regional Jail in Hanover, Virginia.

That same inmate, I have learned, recently broke a jail record for time spent in protective, segregated confinement over his 16 months at the jail.

At Pamunkey, inmates in protective custody are kept in a lockdown state in solitary cells 23 hours per day. They have one hour to shower, make phone calls, and if they’re allowed, exercise in the prison yard.

(Exercise is allowed at the whim of whatever guard happens to be on duty. The yard at Pamunkey, however, is slated to be enclosed. Asked how prisoners could get fresh air and sunshine, the jail’s security director said that they should “look out the window.”)

This inmate, who is a childhood friend of a friend, was in protective custody not because he was in danger or because he was a danger to himself or others, but because he slept with a CPAP machine to help with his breathing. This required an electrical outlet. He offered to give it up to go into the general population, but the jail said this would compromise his health, another reason used to put prisoners in protective, solitary custody.

His neighbors were there for protective reasons and included a former police officer, transgendered people, and people with serious mental health issues who are considered dangerous to others.

Interestingly, the jail doesn’t automatically place sex offenders in solitary/protective custody, and a number of them move freely without incident in gen-pop.

The inmate sent my friend a map and description of the cell he resided in. He estimated (based on his height) that it was about 10 feet by 5 feet. It included a window through which he could be observed by jail staff, and opposite it, a metal door. A one-inch thick mattress rested on a concrete slab. There was a cubby beneath the bed to store clothing. A metal sink and toilet were just to the left of the door and opposite the window.

While the window meant that the prisoner could be observed while using the toilet, it also allowed him to view the TV in the jail dayroom. Sometimes, other prisoners would wander over to talk to him.

The inmate, who suffered for several months with an anal fissure that became a fistula, had a doctor’s order for a second mattress to provide additional padding. It was provided only after a year-long wait.

In the meantime, the prisoner had two surgeries; the second was needed to repair damage caused by the prison's lack of medication, and support normally should be provided after this kind of surgery.

Oh, and in case you wondered: the patient wasn’t permitted to have prescribed painkiller drugs in the days following both surgeries. The pain from the fistula and the area around it after it’s been excised has been likened to “sitting on a sharp knife.”

And although the prisoner was in protective custody, he was transferred for court appearances in a prison van, chained to other inmates. All inmates in protective custody are supposed to be transferred alone. The van had no seatbelts prior to Freddie Gray’s death in a Baltimore police van, and we saw what happened there. Once at the courthouse, he was also kept in holding cells with other prisoners.

The prisoner is now at Virginia’s prisoner processing facility in State Farm, where he is part of the general population. At this time he is in a two-man cell he describes as the size of a bathroom in a pre-McMansion home. Possibly because of the CPAP, he has no cellmate.

While the conditions at State Farm make Pamunkey “look like a Hilton,” (among other things, it has no air conditioning and temperatures in the summer approach the 100s) he appreciates the company of other people during meals and time in the prison yard.

As for his medications: all prisoners are taken off their medications upon arrival at State Farm and evaluated. He has been told he will be put on another antidepressant that didn’t work for him in the past.

More worrying is that he experienced two seizures, at least one a grand mal, during the first week he was taken off anti-seizure medication. My friend has alerted his attorney about this latest development.

To tell you the truth, this is not one of the worst stories that I've heard from solitary. Indeed, one of my cellmates at the Federal Correctional Institution at Loretto, Pennsylvania, had his own nightmare there. And FCI Loretto is federal, which is supposed to be far, far better than any state prison or local jail.

The cellmate, whom I’ll call “James,” was a mentally ill homeless man from Pittsburgh. He’d purposefully violated the terms of his federal probation so he could spend the winter months indoors.

James was clear with both the medical staff and his cellmates that he was mentally ill and needed to be medicated. We appreciated his candor.

But the medical staff’s primary mission is to keep costs low, and drugs for serious mental illness are expensive. Since James was supposed to go home in a few months anyway, they didn’t give him his meds. You can guess what happened: James began to spiral into insanity, and he was sent to solitary confinement.

James’s struggles angered the staff. After one incident in solitary, he was stripped naked, beaten, and thrown outside. It was January, and the temperature in the central Pennsylvania mountains was 10 degrees. An eyewitness told me that James apologized and asked to be let back in. He started crying after a couple of hours in the cold. Then he curled up into a ball and fainted.

No guards were punished for what they did to James. Even if he’d reported it to the federal Bureau of Prisons headquarters, who would have listened to him? Would you believe a uniformed law enforcement officer or a mentally ill homeless man?

The guards got away with it. Across the country, prison guards get away with things like this every day.

The only solution is legislative – at both the federal and state levels. While Congress has made the right noises about reform, Congressional leaders have not allowed these reform measures to come up for a vote. Similarly, some states, like Ohio and Nebraska, have made progress by outlawing solitary for minors. But when a state like Louisiana allows individuals to be kept in solitary for more than 40 years, there is still an obvious human rights problem. The rest is up to voters. We have to demand that our candidates for statewide and national office support sentencing and corrections reform. Until then, our solitary confinement systems will remain an international embarrassment and a crime against humanity.



John Kiriakou is an Associate Fellow with the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington DC. He is a former CIA counterterrorism operations officer and former senior investigator for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 Next > End >>

Page 1958 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN