RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Ivanka Trump Thinks She Is in Beauty and the Beast: More Like Macbeth Print
Saturday, 08 April 2017 08:55

Abramson writes: "You can't have it both ways, Ivanka, especially now that you have new, embossed White House stationery with an official title, assistant to the president."

Ivanka Trump. (photo: AP)
Ivanka Trump. (photo: AP)


Ivanka Trump Thinks She Is in Beauty and the Beast: More Like Macbeth

By Jill Abramson, Guardian UK

08 April 17

 

The first daughter likes to sell herself as the moral conscience of her father’s administration, but the deep ethical stains are on her hands too

ou can’t have it both ways, Ivanka, especially now that you have new, embossed White House stationery with an official title, assistant to the president.

Drop the wink, wink, nod, nod pretence that you and Jared Kushner are “moderating influences” – where is the moderation? Kushner, who holds the same nebulous but all powerful White House job, has huge influence derived from having married a Trump. Like him, your loyalty is unquestioned. Everyone knows you are your father’s most intimate adviser, in business and, no doubt, politics, too. The two of you bring nepotism to a new level, even surpassing JFK’s choice of Bobby for attorney general. Predictably, you are both already targets of myriad conflict-of-interest stories in the media.

The notion that you are a voice for women should have been voided during the good ol’ “grab them by the pussy” days of the campaign. Now, with your father’s defence of disgraced Fox host Bill O’Reilly as “a good person” who shouldn’t have spent $13m settling sexual misconduct lawsuits, you need to cut the con job.

Of course, you are not the only practitioner of pretend feminism in Washington, but you’ve played the pro-woman card more ostentatiously than anyone. At the GOP convention in Cleveland, you wowed everyone, even those “enemies of the people” in the news media, with your paean to working moms. But your proposal for six weeks of paid maternity leave for new mothers won’t apply to new fathers, which almost every expert on gender pay equality believes is vital for women to stay on track and win promotion. They will certainly dissect every word of your upcoming book, Women Who Work: Rewriting the Rules for Success.

As with almost everything in this billionaires’ club administration, money explains your own brand marketing. You have a lot on the line: $100m in sales for your women’s apparel line, mostly made in Asia. But sometime soon you will not be able to cover all the moral contradictions of your carefully sculpted pose.

When Roger Ailes was dumped by Fox for serial harassment – a new lawsuit was filed just this week – your father’s response was lame. This was hardly surprising given that Fox is the Trump network. He said he hoped you’d find another job (and boss) if you were hit on at work. As a trustee for Rupert Murdoch’s two young daughters, your own silence was preordained, but nonetheless disappointing.

And with dear dad backing rightwing GOP plans that eviscerate women’s health, the chimera that you would be a pro-woman influence was starkly revealed.

It’s hard to take your pledge to CBS’s Gayle King that you will live up to the highest ethical standards very seriously. You’ve worn too many interchangeable hats: manager of the Trump real estate empire, head of your own clothing label, presidential assistant and, most importantly, daughter. Though you have formally stepped away from some of these roles, your interests intersect and cannot remain separate for very long. If you thought joining the White House staff in an official capacity would help inoculate you against ethical questions, you can forget it. Being an official part of the administration with a broad portfolio just makes you fairer game.

When King pressed you about being complicit in the Trump agenda, your reply was laughably lame: “If being complicit is wanting to be a force for good … then I’m complicit.”

Complicit is when women who make millions from luxury brands appealing to affluent females should be called out when they fail to speak honestly about sexual misconduct in the workplace. I was a working mom too, and part of me wanted to believe that you would be a champion for women. But looking at your Instagram posts, which show you playing with your three adorable children, presumably after a day at work, or reposting celebrity speeches about paid leave, so much of what you’ve done looks to be yet another image campaign for brand building. Now it’s fair to ask, how are you actually going to help women?

The same could be asked of Delphine Arnault, the only woman on 21st Century Fox’s board of directors. Has she said a word to her dozen male colleagues, who include Murdoch pere and sons Lachlan and James, about O’Reilly? If ever there was a case of blatant corporate malfeasance, it’s surely the secret payments and toleration of blatant misconduct by Ailes and O’Reilly. Arnault is the executive vice president of Louis Vuitton Malletier and a director of Christian Dior. Both of these brands owe their success to the loyalty and money of women. Fees from these directorships alone have made her rich. Delphine, where do you stand on the misdeeds of either Ailes or O’Reilly? How do you justify your presence on the Fox boards and the fees you collect for that service?

Your brand will be tarnished by your silence and you will be remembered as the board member who didn’t say a word about Fox’s fevered misogyny.

You and Ivanka will eventually look hard at each other across the generations and you won’t much like the view. Both of your brands are fiction and everyone will know it.

For their part, the younger Murdochs have not made good on their pledge to clean up the Ailes mess by creating a corporate culture based “on trust and respect”. The O’Reilly cases, meticulously reported by The New York Times, were known to management while the Murdochs were busily drawing up a new contract for the blustery, harassing host. Women at Fox are reportedly extremely disturbed by the hypocrisy of the Murdoch clan. Until they usher out O’Reilly, the family is, to use Ivanka’s term, complicit in his conduct.

It’s impossible to cleanse all these deep ethical stains or separate Ivanka from the sins of the father. No matter how hard she tries to make it so, this is not Beauty and the Beast. It’s more like Macbeth.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
CEOs Now Make 300 Times More Than Their Workers. This City Is Putting a Stop to That Print
Saturday, 08 April 2017 08:43

Collins writes: "With national policy likely to compound the income and wealth gap in the coming years, states and localities are fighting back."

The statistics showing the widening pay gap between CEOs and their workers are stunning. (photo: Ben Hider/NYSE Euronext)
The statistics showing the widening pay gap between CEOs and their workers are stunning. (photo: Ben Hider/NYSE Euronext)


CEOs Now Make 300 Times More Than Their Workers. This City Is Putting a Stop to That

By Chuck Collins, YES! Magazine

08 April 17

 

Runaway CEO pay contributes to income inequality and ultimately harms companies, so local governments aren’t waiting for a federal fix.

ith national policy likely to compound the income and wealth gap in the coming years, states and localities are fighting back.

Across the country, local jurisdictions aren’t waiting for federal action or corporate governance reforms to close the wage gap. In December, for example, the city of Portland, Oregon, passed an ordinance to raise the business tax on companies with CEOs who earn more than 100 times the median pay of their workers. Portland officials said the ordinance is the first of its kind in the country. And now, more cities and states are poised to follow suit.

“The huge divide in income and wealth has real-world implications,” Steve Novick wrote last October in Inequality.org. Novick sponsored the ordinance when he was on the Portland City Council. “Too many Americans cannot get a leg up,” he wrote. “Income inequality undermines the American dream.”

Portland city government projects the tax will raise $2.5 million to $3.5 million a year, which city officials have said will likely help pay for the city’s homeless programs.

Inspired by the living wage movement

Portland’s ordinance comes on the heels of decades of grassroots activism around the issue of wage inequality.

Starting in the 1990s, the failure of Congress to adequately raise the federal minimum wage gave rise to a prairie-fire movement of local activists pressing for local and state living wage ordinances. Living wage ordinances typically cover a segment of workers, such as employees of government contractors, while minimum wage laws cover all workers. By 2010, over 120 jurisdictions had passed local living wage laws, and at present, 41 jurisdictions have passed minimum wage laws.

“I expect this pay gap reform movement to spread like wildfire, just as the living wage movement did,” said Sarah Anderson from the Institute for Policy Studies. “I’ve gotten inquiries from over two dozen states and cities about how to establish a pay gap ordinance.”

Anderson lobbied the Portland City Council in support of the policy and testified at a public hearing. She has since compiled resources for communities interested in instituting a CEO-worker pay gap penalty.

Statewide laws similar to the Portland ordinance have also been proposed in Illinois, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Minnesota, and Connecticut.

Meanwhile, some CEOs are advocating against these reforms. The conservative Business Roundtable, for example—which is an association of CEOs nationwide—has identified the repeal of federal pay ratio disclosure regulations as one of its top priorities.

Runaway CEO pay problem

The statistics showing the widening pay gap between CEOs and their workers are stunning. In the mid-1960s, the gap was about 20 to 1. By 2014, the gap had swollen to about 300 to 1.

“Skyrocketing CEO pay is one of the drivers of increased U.S. income concentration,” Anderson says.

Between 1979 and 2007, rising pay for corporate executives was a “major factor” contributing to income expansion for the top 1 percent, according to a 2015 report by the Economic Policy Institute. Meanwhile, worker wages have largely stagnated since the late 1970s.

Runaway CEO pay contributes to income inequality, but it also harms companies. CEO pay practices drove the reckless bonus culture that fueled the 2008 economic meltdown. And corporate governance experts recognize that large pay disparities are bad for company performance and undermine morale within firms.

As a result, company shareholders globally have tried to rein in excessive pay. And as part of the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation, public corporations will have to disclose their CEO-worker pay ratio, starting with their 2017 pay figures.

Nationally, some federal and state lawmakers have proposed capping the tax deductibility of CEO pay. Currently, corporations can deduct unlimited amounts of so-called performance pay, including stock options and certain types of bonuses. This means that the more corporations pay their CEOs, the less they pay in taxes. Sens. Jack Reed and Richard Blumenthal and Rep. Lloyd Doggett are leading efforts to get rid of this perverse loophole.

Recently, these lawmakers reintroduced the 2017 Stop Subsidizing Multimillion Dollar Corporate Bonuses Act, which would treat bonuses as salaries and cap their deductibility at $1 million.

Several other federal lawmakers—including Reps. Mark DeSaulnier and Bonnie Watson Coleman—have championed the CEO Accountability and Responsibility Act to link federal tax rates to companies’ CEO-worker pay ratios. The Act increases rates on companies with a relatively large CEO-worker pay gap and reduces taxes on companies with a relatively small pay gap.

But with a Wall Street-friendly Congress and a Trump administration likely to block federal reforms to address the CEO-worker pay gap, the arena of struggle will likely be at the local and state level.

The Portland ordinance

The Portland ordinance shows what local jurisdictions can do to address runaway CEO pay.

It applies to large corporations with the most egregious pay disparities. Portland government has identified over 500 such companies. A number of these top the annual list of CEO compensation, including Honeywell, Oracle, Wells Fargo, General Electric, and Goldman Sachs. The ordinance only applies to public corporations like these because they are required to disclose their pay ratio through the new federal disclosure requirement.

Most private and smaller- to medium-size public businesses in the city will not be subjected to the tax. Portland city government projects that 88 percent of revenue will come from the top 10 percent of corporate taxpayers; if you expand that to include the top 20 percent of corporate taxpayers, then it’s 96 percent.

Wall Street’s representatives in Congress will be working to gut the federal disclosure law for pay ratios in the coming year. But cities and states have the ability to address runaway inequality. Watch for more local jurisdictions to push forward CEO-worker pay gap reform.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Nation Desperately Hopes Real Reason for Bannon's Exit Will Not Involve Sex Tape Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=9160"><span class="small">Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker</span></a>   
Friday, 07 April 2017 15:10

Borowitz writes: "A broad majority of Americans do not believe that they have heard the real reason for Steve Bannon's abrupt removal from the National Security Council but desperately hope that, when that reason ultimately emerges, it will not involve a sex tape."

White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon. (photo: Reuters)
White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon. (photo: Reuters)


Nation Desperately Hopes Real Reason for Bannon's Exit Will Not Involve Sex Tape

By Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker

07 April 17

 

The article below is satire. Andy Borowitz is an American comedian and New York Times-bestselling author who satirizes the news for his column, "The Borowitz Report."

broad majority of Americans do not believe that they have heard the real reason for Steve Bannon’s abrupt removal from the National Security Council but desperately hope that, when that reason ultimately emerges, it will not involve a sex tape.

The snapshot of a nation praying for Bannon’s exit to be explained by anything but a sex tape was captured by a poll taken late on Wednesday, in which more than ninety per cent of Americans expressed their anxiety about such an outcome.

When poll respondents were asked about the real reason for Bannon’s removal, forty-two per cent said that they hoped it would involve a financial scandal, thirty-one per cent said that they hoped it would somehow relate to Russia, and zero per cent said that they hoped for a sex tape.

The terror inspired by the thought of a Bannon-based sex tape cut across party lines, with Democrats calling the idea slightly more traumatizing than Republicans did.

Finally, when asked how they would react if Bannon’s sudden departure did, in fact, turn out to involve a sex tape, an overwhelming majority “strongly agreed” with the statement “Please, please, please, God, no.”

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
There's a Lot of Smoke Around Donald Trump's Associates and Russia Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=44624"><span class="small">Chris Cillizza, CNN</span></a>   
Friday, 07 April 2017 14:58

Cillizza writes: "President Donald Trump likes to dismiss the allegations surrounding the contacts between top aides on his campaign and Russian officials as 'fake news.' Trump insists that there is no there there. That there is no fire. To date, he's right. But there is a whole heck of a lot of smoke."

Blackwater founder Erik Prince. (photo: Getty)
Blackwater founder Erik Prince. (photo: Getty)


There's a Lot of Smoke Around Donald Trump's Associates and Russia

By Chris Cillizza, CNN

07 April 17

 

resident Donald Trump likes to dismiss the allegations surrounding the contacts between top aides on his campaign and Russian officials as "fake news."

Trump insists that there is no there there. That there is no fire.

To date, he's right. But there is a whole heck of a lot of smoke.

Consider:

Erik Prince, who founded Blackwater and is Education Secretary Betsy DeVos's brother, was part of a secret meeting in January in the Seychelles Islands with a Russian close to Vladimir Putin, according to reporting from the Washington Post on Monday. Russia's goal in the meeting, according to the Post, was to establish a sort of unofficial line of communication with the Trump administration. Prince played no formal role in the Trump campaign or the transition, but did donate $250,000 to a combination of Trump campaign entities.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions was forced to recuse himself from any investigations regarding any investigation into Russia's attempts at meddling in the 2016 election due to revelations that he had met with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak on two occasions despite insisting during his confirmation hearing that he had no contact with the Russians during the campaign.

Michael Flynn resigned as Trump's national security adviser following reports that he had not only talked with Kislyak during the transition but that -- contrary to his assertions -- he had discussed the recently-imposed sanctions against Russia imposed by the Obama Administration as a punishment for the election meddling. Flynn, through a lawyer, said he would be interviewed by Congress in regard to the Russian meddling into the election but would only do so if he was granted full immunity. The Senate Intelligence Community rejected that offer.

Jared Kushner: Trump's son-in-law -- and someone with a vast portfolio in the administration -- met with Kislyak and Flynn at Trump Tower during the presidential transition period. Kushner also met with a Russian bank executive at Kislyak's request.

Paul Manafort, who served as Trump's campaign chairman for a large chunk of the GOP nomination fight, has long had ties to pro-Putin forces un Ukraine -- having spent a decade working with Ukrainian Prime Minister Victor Yanukovych. And, according to the Associated Press, Manafort inked a $10 million deal with a billionaire ally of Putin in the mid 2000s in order to help promote Putin and Russian interests in the United States and other countries. Manafort has said his work for Oleg Deripaska did not include anything political. Late last month Mafort did say that he would be willing to sit for an interview with the House Intelligence Committee to discuss Russia's role in the election.

Carter Page, brought on as a foreign policy adviser to Trump's campaign on March 2016, almost immediately became a lightning rod due to his close ties to Russia. (Page spent three years in the Moscow office of Merrill Lynch and claimed to be an adviser to several; state-owned and run energy companies.) Page was eventually fired from the campaign in late September after reports that during a July trip to Moscow he has huddled with a number of senior Russian executives, a claim he denied.

Roger Stone, noted political gadfly and Trump friend and quasi-adviser, has acknowledged that he exchanged Twitter messages with Guccifer 2.0, the hacker allegedly behind the leaking of emails from the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. Stone insists he had nothing to do with the coordinated release of the documents during the course of the 2016 campaign.

That's A LOT of smoke. Now, just because there's tons of smoke doesn't mean there's a fire somewhere in there. But, what it does do is suggest that Trump's dismissal of questions about his campaign's ties to Russia are much more than "fake news."

And, if Trump truly believes that there is no fire, his best move would be to put his full weight behind a bipartisan investigation aimed at getting out all of the facts. He has yet to do so.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Prescribing Crisis: How the Pharmaceutical Industry Fuels the Opioid Epidemic Print
Friday, 07 April 2017 14:54

Colson writes: "A profit-hungry pharmaceutical industry and an indifferent political class are fueling the deadly opioid epidemic."

Pill bottles. (photo: Wikimedia)
Pill bottles. (photo: Wikimedia)


Prescribing Crisis: How the Pharmaceutical Industry Fuels the Opioid Epidemic

By Nicole Colson, Jacobin

07 April 17

 

A profit-hungry pharmaceutical industry and an indifferent political class are fueling the deadly opioid epidemic.

n early March, West Virginia passed an ugly milestone: A state program designed to provide money for burial assistance for needy families ran out of funds nearly four months before the end of the fiscal year.

This is the fifth year in a row that money for the program ran out. The main cause? Increased deaths resulting from the worst opioid epidemic in any state in the United States. Deaths from drug overdoses in the state climbed to nearly three times the national average in 2015.

But West Virginia isn’t alone. The opioid epidemic has reached such proportions in Ohio that the coroner for Stark County, where the city of Canton is located, had to ask the state Emergency Management Agency for a cold storage trailer — the kind used at disaster scenes — to store the overflow of bodies from the morgue.

According to the Ohio Department of Health, the number of opioid-related deaths — including overdoses from both illegal opioids like heroin and prescription versions like fentanyl and OxyContin — was 296 in 2003. By 2015, that number had jumped to 2,590 — a 775 percent increase.

In an interview with the Washington Post, Rick Walters, an investigator for the Stark County coroner’s office, said, “I’ve been involved in public safety for forty-some years. I remember the drug problem we had in the late sixties and early seventies when I joined the department. The fatality numbers were nothing even close to this.”

The Crisis

Headlines from the Washington Post in recent months paint a grim picture of the opioid addiction crisis stalking America:

A 19-pound 5-year-old died of an overdose. Prosecutors blame his parents — and OxyContin.”

A 7-year-old told her bus driver she couldn’t wake her parents. Police found them dead at home.”

Ohio city shares shocking photos of adults who overdosed with a small child in the car

Across the country, opioids killed more than thirty-three thousand people in 2015, more than any year on record. That’s just under the number of fatalities from car crashes.

The epidemic is increasingly severe in smaller cities and towns in the Rust Belt — the onetime industrial center of the United States that has suffered from decades of economic decline, population loss, infrastructure decay, and declining living standards. In 2015, the top five states for drug overdoses were Ohio, West Virginia, New Hampshire, Kentucky, and Rhode Island.

One stark illustration of just how severe the crisis is came in mid-March. At a town hall meeting with Democratic senator Bernie Sanders in McDowell County, West Virginia, host Chris Hayes asked how many in the audience had lost a loved one to the opioid epidemic. Nearly half of the audience members raised their hands.

Sanders excoriated the pharmaceutical industry for making “billions in profits by getting young people addicted and ruining their lives.”

He wasn’t exaggerating. Nationally, nearly half of all opioid overdose deaths in 2015 involved a prescription drug. A December investigation by the Charleston, West Virginia Gazette-Mail found that from 2007 to 2012, pharmaceutical companies shipped more than 780 million doses of hydrocodone and oxycodone to West Virginia — approximately 433 pain pills for every man, woman and child in the state.

The Addiction Industry

Now, some manufacturers are finding ways to exploit the addiction and overdose crisis to maximize profits.

Recently, an advisory panel of the Food and Drug Administration determined that a powerful opioid painkiller named Opana ER had risks of abuse that outweigh its potential benefits.

Opana ER is an update on an earlier version of the drug, reformulated to make it harder to crush — under the theory this would help prevent it from being abused through snorting. Instead, drug users found that they could inject the reformulated drug for a more powerful high — the numbers of those injecting it are estimated to have doubled.

In 2015, use of Opana ER among intravenous drug users who shared needles was linked to an outbreak of HIV in rural Scott County, Indiana — the home state of Mike Pence, now the vice president, but then governor of the state.

Pence’s solution to this public health crisis? Local and state health officials and even law enforcement begged him to implement a clean-needle exchange program, but Pence refused to act for more than two months, saying he would “pray” on it.

Pence finally issued an executive order allowing syringes to be distributed, but he explicitly prohibited counties from using state funds to purchase syringes. Meanwhile, a total of 181 people who lived in or used drugs in Scott County contracted HIV.

And the connection to pharmaceutical company profits? It turns out that the real motive for reformulating Opana was financial — to block competition from generic versions of the drug, which could have decreased net sales by up to $135 million, NPR reported.

Despair

The opioid epidemic ravaging communities across the country is one aspect of a deep social crisis impacting workers and the poor.

It shouldn’t be surprising that the crisis is sharpest in Rust Belt communities, where deindustrialization and job losses have caused deepening poverty and alienation. Such communities are emblematic of what researchers Anne Case and Angus Deaton have called a “sea of despair” engulfing white, working-class Americans.

Because of poverty, racism, and a host of other factors, working-class and poor African Americans in particular continue to suffer a staggeringly high mortality rate. But Case and Deaton have found that “the death rate of midlife non-Hispanic white Americans had risen steadily since 1999,” in contrast to a decline for blacks and Latinos.

Their original study in 2015 cited a spike in mortality for middle-age white women due to overdoses, alcoholism, and suicide — something unprecedented in a wealthy Western nation.

Last month, Case and Deaton updated their study — and found that the trend has continued. The immediate source of the increasing death rates, according to the researchers, is the struggle to find work in early adulthood among whites who are less educated. This puts them at a “cumulative disadvantage” that leads to an increase in health and personal problems, including physical pain, that can result in drug overdoses, alcohol-related liver disease, and suicide.

As the Washington Post reported:

Whites continue to have longer life expectancy than African Americans and lower death rates, but that gap has narrowed since the late 1990s. The picture may have shifted again around the Great Recession, however: Graphs accompanying the new paper suggest that death rates for Blacks with only a high-school education began rising around 2010 in many age groups, as if following the trend that began about a decade earlier among whites.

White men continue to die at higher rates than white women in every age group. But because women started with lower death rates, the recent mortality increase reflects a greater change in their likelihood of dying early. The numbers reported by Case and Deaton suggest that white men today are about twice as likely as they were in 1999 to die from one of the “diseases of despair,” while women are about four times as likely.

While there have been some criticisms raised about Case and Deaton’s study, the phenomenon they are reporting on appears to be real. Their work points to the impact of a whole constellation of social and material factors that have contributed to declining living standards for working-class whites since the 1970s.

This is more evidence of the growing immiseration of a section of US workers who were promised the “American Dream” in the past, but face grimmer prospects in the present and future. Of course, the “American Dream” was never in reach for black workers and other groups, but Case and Deaton’s study illuminates a social crisis affecting all workers, with seismic consequences. As Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor said in a Socialism 2016 speech:

The privileges of white skin run very thin in a country where nineteen million white people languish in poverty. Apparently, the wages of whiteness are not so great to stop millions of ordinary white people from literally drinking and drugging themselves to death to escape the despair of living in this so-called “last, best hope of earth.”

Political Failure

In the face of all this, there has been almost no political action.

One reason is the fact that mainstream political leaders have their hands deep in the pockets of the drug industry, particularly opioid manufacturers.

September report from the Associated Press and Center for Public Integrity found that pharmaceutical companies and allied groups spent more than $880 million on campaign contributions and lobbying at the state and federal government levels between 2006 and 2015 — “more than eight times what the formidable gun lobby recorded for similar activities during that same period.”

That’s chump change for the industry, however — especially companies manufacturing lucrative opioids. “Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin and one of the largest opioid producers by sales, pulled in an estimated $2.4 billion from opioids [in 2015] alone,” the report notes.

And Purdue, like other drug companies, is happy to contribute to both parties. “Purdue, with $100,000 in 2015 alone, tied with four other entities for top contributor to the Democratic Attorneys General Association; it was among the top 10 donors to the Republican group, giving more than $200,000,” the Center for Public Integrity reported.

From 2006 to 2015, members of an industry lobbying group known as the Pain Care Forum contributed to more than 8,500 candidates across the country. In return, some of those public officials supported or killed legislation that would have curtailed prescriptions for opioids and implemented other restrictions on drugs that might have hurt the companies’ bottom lines.

For his part, while Donald Trump repeatedly decried the opioid epidemic on the campaign trail and promised to expand access to drug treatment, his push to repeal the Affordable Care Act would have ended the federal requirement that services for addiction and mental-health treatment be covered under Medicaid — at least in the thirty-one states that expanded it under Obama’s ACA.

If there was any further proof needed that Trump isn’t serious about combating the opioid crisis, all you need to know is the person who Trump has put in charge of the issue: Chris Christie.

In late March, Trump announced that he was appointing the corrupt New Jersey governor to lead a commission on fighting the opioid crisis. As governor, Christie expanded some addiction services, but he is a political laughingstock these days, with two of his former staffers sentenced for conspiracy and fraud and the governor himself possibly facing charges soon.

A real solution to the opioid epidemic would involve a massive expansion of health care, including free, fact-based addiction treatment; the creation of well-paying jobs with benefits; increased social spending; and a strengthening of the tattered social safety net that today’s workers must struggle not to fall through.

None of that, however, is on offer. Certainly not from Trump, whose slash-and-burn budget proposal will only deepen the crisis, nor from the Democratic “opposition,” which may claim to feel workers’ pain, but has contributed to the problem during eight years of a Democrat in the White House.

If we want to stop the crisis ravaging communities across the country, we’ll need to fight to make sure that the policies that can save people’s lives don’t fall by the wayside yet again.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 Next > End >>

Page 1678 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN