RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Lindsey Graham Disregards Violence Toward Women, and His State Is a Women's Murder Capital Print
Saturday, 29 September 2018 08:22

Cole writes: "Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) made it abundantly clear in the hearing on Thursday that he cares more about Republican Party control of the Supreme Court than about rape victims."

Senate Judiciary Committee member Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) shouts while questioning Judge Brett Kavanaugh during his Supreme Court confirmation hearing in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill, September 27, 2018, in Washington, D.C. (photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Senate Judiciary Committee member Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) shouts while questioning Judge Brett Kavanaugh during his Supreme Court confirmation hearing in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill, September 27, 2018, in Washington, D.C. (photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)


Lindsey Graham Disregards Violence Toward Women, and His State Is a Women's Murder Capital

By Juan Cole, Informed Comment

29 September 18

 

enator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) made it abundantly clear in the hearing on Thursday that he cares more about Republican Party control of the Supreme Court than about rape victims. He implied that the charges of sexual assault that have surfaced against Brett Kavanaugh are a Democratic Party plot to deny Trump a Supreme Court justice.

He angrily threatened to smear the next Democratic nominee in turn.

Graham’s charge of conspiracy makes no sense, since the Democrats did not make Dr. Blasey Ford come forward, nor did they make the other three women come forward (one, in Montgomery county, has for the time being withdrawn her complaint with the police; perhaps she feared being treated by Graham and his pack hounds the way Dr. Blasey Ford was.)

The Republican evangelicals are always attacking Muslim fundamentalism for not giving equal rights to women. Actually modern Muslim states like Tunisia have women’s equality in the constitution. But it is true that some Muslim fundamentalists argue that a woman’s testimony in court should be worth half that of a man, which makes convicting a man of rape almost impossible. Ironically, the attitude of the Republican men on the Judiciary Committee is the same as would be that of a Muslim fundamentalist. They clearly believe that the testimony of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, a high-powered professor of psychiatry at Palo Atlo and Stanford Universities, counts for less than that of a preppie white elite male.

Graham’s tone deafness to rape victims is nothing new. He has consistently voted against the Violence against Women Act. Indeed, the Republican Congress is going to let the act expire this weekend, ironically the same weekend they will shoehorn Kavanaugh onto the Supreme Court. Nobody on cable news will tell you that or make the connection.

In Graham’s worldview, the Democrats got their nominees, whom he voted for, and they are being beastly to take this one away from the Republicans. But he neglects to mention what was done to Merrick Garland by the GOP. And he unfairly blames the Democratic Party for Kavanaugh’s behavior as a besotted youth (one woman would have been an accusation; 4 are a certainty).

Sen. Graham called the hearing, which merely allowed Kavanaugh’s alleged victim to state her experience, the worst thing he had ever seen in his career in politics.

Graham supported the invasion and occupation of Iraq, which left hundreds of thousands dead, destabilized the Middle East, created 4 million refugees, and led to the rise of the hyper-fundamentalist ISIL/ Daesh in a formerly secular and socialist country. I’d gently suggest that that was the worst thing we’ve seen in his political career, and that whether Kavanaugh is called to account for instances in his youth where he, allegedly, tried violently to insert his penis in an unwilling girl pales in comparison. Or perhaps Graham thinks the honor of a white gentleman outweighs the displacement of 4 million brown Iraqis.

Graham’s hierarchy of values may explain why he as senator has not done more about the severe problem his own state of South Carolina has with violence toward women. It really is an outlier nationally in this regard.

The state, among all fifty, with the very highest rate of women killed by men in 2014 was South Carolina ((pop. 5 million).

In the past decade, South Carolina has ranked in the top five states for for women murdered by men.

The proportion of women killed by men per population in South Carolina is TWICE the national average in the US.

An astonishing 92% of female murder victims knew their murderer, and 62% had been in an intimate relationship with the killer.

Some 36,000 domestic and intimate partner assaults are reported every year in South Carolina.

South Carolina’s rate of sexual assault has been higher than the national average since 1982 and increased by 12% a year in some years of this decade.

More than half of all victims of sexual assault in South Carolina are not seen by a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner.

Few prosecutions of sexual assault in South Carolina result in a conviction on that charge; large numbers of cases are never brought, large numbers of the cases brought are dismissed, and most convictions are the result of plea deals in which defendants cop to lesser, non-sexual charges (36% of those charged are only convicted in this way statewide).

Some South Carolinian newspapers have attributed the unusual rates of violence against women in the state to “southern culture” (by which they seem to mean a kind of patriarchy in which the male head of family feels he ‘owns’ the other family members and that outsiders have no business with his private affairs). The leniency of court sentencing, such that violent men who attack women are allowed back out on the street after short terms in jail, is also blamed.

Another indication of low status for women is the rate of death in childbirth. South Carolina has the 9th worst record among the 50 states on this measure. In California, where people in government actually care about the lives and welfare of women, maternal mortality has been cut in half.

In general, South Carolina is a dangerous state, with 501 violent crimes per 100,000 population annually, 35% higher than the rest of the US.

Perhaps what with being a senator and lawmaker and elite and all, Sen. Graham could do something about the high rates of violence against women in his state.

Bonus video:

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The Time Is Now, We Must #CancelKavanaugh and #VoteThemOut This November Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=35918"><span class="small">Michael Moore, Michael Moore's Facebook Page</span></a>   
Friday, 28 September 2018 13:07

Moore writes: "This morning the Judiciary Committee plans to vote on whether to send Judge Kavanaugh to the Senate for nomination to the Supreme Court."

Michael Moore. (photo: New York Times)
Michael Moore. (photo: New York Times)


The Time Is Now, We Must #CancelKavanaugh and #VoteThemOut This November

By Michael Moore, Michael Moore's Facebook Page

28 September 18

 

his morning the Judiciary Committee plans to vote on whether to send Judge Kavanaugh to the Senate for nomination to the Supreme Court. A life time appointment where he will undoubtedly go after Roe V. Wade. This committee driven by men holds no regard for women and their credibility as survivors or judgments of character. The time is now, we must #cancelkavanaugh and #VoteThemOut this Nov.


Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Trump's Latest Immigration Proposal Is a Looming Public Health Crisis Print
Friday, 28 September 2018 13:07

Samari writes: "In the effort to eliminate health disparities, we must actively work against the Trump administration's xenophobic policies."

Honduran Eilyn Carbajal hugs her then-8-year-old son, Nahun Eduardo Puerto Pineda, right, on August 3 after they were reunited at the Cayuga Center in New York. (photo: Richard Drew/AP)
Honduran Eilyn Carbajal hugs her then-8-year-old son, Nahun Eduardo Puerto Pineda, right, on August 3 after they were reunited at the Cayuga Center in New York. (photo: Richard Drew/AP)


Trump's Latest Immigration Proposal Is a Looming Public Health Crisis

By Goleen Samari, The Washington Post

28 September 18

 

hen my parents came to the United States 40 years ago, they were seeking higher education. Then, in 1979, the Iranian Revolution cut them off both financially and emotionally from their home country. Through perseverance and public support, they built their American life and became citizens. I am a beneficiary of those efforts: a U.S.-born child of immigrants and a university professor.

Today, people who have immigrated here, like my parents, are facing another targeted, xenophobic attack. The Trump administration, which has already implemented a travel ban against five majority-Muslim countries — including Iran — and locked immigrant children in cages, proposed a new rule this month that would punish legal immigrants for accessing basic needs programs. The Department of Homeland Security seeks to deny permanent residency for legal immigrants who have used social service programs, including health insurance, cash and nutrition benefits. These immigrants will not be able to build their lives as my parents did. They will be forced to choose between the programs that help them create a healthy life in a new country and their chance at becoming citizens.

Denying access to public needs programs for a significant segment of the population is a looming public-health crisis.

In the past, the “public charge” rule referred only to a narrow group of people, such as those who need cash assistance for more than half their income. The proposed regulation would extend the denials of green cards to immigrants who use a variety of programs, such as Medicaid and nutrition programs, or even those whose U.S.-citizen children use those programs. The Migration Policy Institute estimates that the proposed rule would expand the share of legal immigrants subject to denial from 3 percent to a staggering 47 percent.

Contrary to the belief that immigrants overuse public benefits, lower percentages of poor immigrants use public benefits than similarly poor U.S.-born natives. When immigrants do use public programs, they cost the government less per beneficiary, reducing costs in the long run.

Limiting access to social programs decimates the health and well-being of immigrant families. Health resources include health care and insurance, but also jobs, education, social capital and social services — all of which fundamentally support health.

DHS itself acknowledges the potential damaging effects, noting in the proposed rule that lack of enrollment in public programs could lead to worse health outcomes, especially for pregnant or breastfeeding women, infants and children. Outcomes include increased emergency room visits, delayed treatment and increased prevalence of diseases. That’s coupled with the chronic stress caused by anti-immigrant policies that contribute to declining heath. Studies have found that in states with more anti-immigrant laws, Latino Americans experience more barriers to accessing health care and higher rates of poor mental-health days.

DHS has also determined that the rule may increase poverty for certain families and children, including U.S. citizen children. The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that there are 10.4 million citizen children with at least one noncitizen parent and that nearly 6 million children receive public-health benefits. These families could be separated if a parent is considered a public charge and not granted legal permanent residency.

Immigrants who legally migrated, pay taxes and contribute to society now risk deportation if they ever find themselves in an emergency situation in which they have to rely on their American community. And the chilling effect of this rule would go far beyond the already large number of legal immigrants receiving support.

More than 26 million people reside in families receiving benefits with at least one immigrant member. The fear of being denied legal permanent residency could cause millions of legal immigrants to withdraw from all public programs. In fact, scaring vulnerable populations off public assistance and blocking use of public programs could cost much more in the long run, because neglecting preventive health care and basic medical problems creates chronic and complex medical problems, making patients more expensive to treat down the road.

Public-health recognizes that anti-immigrant policies are forms of racism that are antithetical to valuing health for all. These policies endanger and lead to premature mortality among large portions of the population and do nothing to keep Americans safe. In the effort to eliminate health disparities, we must actively work against the Trump administration’s xenophobic policies. We are all Americans, and we must urge Congress to block this proposal so that we can promote the health of all Americans.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: Why Brett Kavanaugh Wasn't Believable Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=43297"><span class="small">The New York Times Editorial Board</span></a>   
Friday, 28 September 2018 11:19

Excerpt: "What a study in contrasts: Where Christine Blasey Ford was calm and dignified, Brett Kavanaugh was volatile and belligerent."

Brett Kavanaugh at Senate hearing. (photo: Getty)
Brett Kavanaugh at Senate hearing. (photo: Getty)


Why Brett Kavanaugh Wasn't Believable

By The New York Times Editorial Board

28 September 18


And why Christine Blasey Ford was.

hat a study in contrasts: Where Christine Blasey Ford was calm and dignified, Brett Kavanaugh was volatile and belligerent; where she was eager to respond fully to every questioner, and kept worrying whether she was being “helpful” enough, he was openly contemptuous of several senators; most important, where she was credible and unshakable at every point in her testimony, he was at some points evasive, and some of his answers strained credulity.

Indeed, Dr. Blasey’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday was devastating.

With the eyes of the nation on her, Dr. Blasey recounted an appalling trauma. When she was 15 years old, she said, she was sexually assaulted by Judge Kavanaugh, then a 17-year-old student at a nearby high school and now President Trump’s nominee to the Supreme Court.

Email This Page

READ MORE

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The Republican Party's Woman Problem Is in the Spotlight Print
Friday, 28 September 2018 08:32

Excerpt: "Eleven Republican men, backed by a Republican president plagued by sex scandal, will soon judge the credibility of a woman accusing President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee of sexual assault."

NC Senator, Republican Lindsey Graham erupts during a special hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee to hear testimony from Dr. Christine Blasey Ford. (photo: Win McNamee/Getty)
NC Senator, Republican Lindsey Graham erupts during a special hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee to hear testimony from Dr. Christine Blasey Ford. (photo: Win McNamee/Getty)


The Republican Party's Woman Problem Is in the Spotlight

By Steve Peoples and Juana Summers, Associated Press

28 September 18

 

leven Republican men, backed by a Republican president plagued by sex scandal, will soon judge the credibility of a woman accusing President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee of sexual assault.

Ahead of the extraordinary moment, never has the GOP's problem with women been more apparent. And it comes six weeks before the midterm elections of Trump's presidency amid a political realignment of the sexes that could shape U.S. elections for a generation.

While there are political risks for both sides, a vocal minority in Trump's GOP warned that their party's strained relationship with women could suffer permanent damage if the Republicans who control the confirmation process ignore mounting allegations of sexual misconduct by Brett Kavanaugh and give him a lifetime seat on the nation's high court.

"I do not believe the claim of sexual assault is invalid because a 15-year-old girl didn't report the assault to authorities, as the president of the United States said just two days ago," Republican Sen. Jeff Flake, who is not running for re-election this fall, said Wednesday. "How uninformed and uncaring do we have to be to say things like that, much less believe them?"

The Arizona senator added: "How many times do we have to marginalize and ignore women before we learn that important lesson?"

Kavanaugh has vehemently denied all sexual misconduct allegations.

Even before his accusers came forward, 2018 had emerged as the year of the woman in politics. But with control of Congress and state houses across the nation at stake, it's Democratic women who are most engaged.

A total of 603 women are still in the running for Congress or statewide office this year, according to Rutgers Center for American Women and Politics. Of that group, just 108 — fewer than 2 in 10 — are Republicans.

Thursday's hearing has highlighted the GOP's deficit with women.

None of the Republicans on the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee is a woman. Party leaders hired what Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called a "female assistant," a special victims prosecutor based in Arizona, to question Christine Blasey Ford, who alleged that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her when they were both in high school.

At least two more women have alleged misconduct, though Republican leaders who control the process have excluded them from the hearing. Nor have they allowed witnesses or further federal investigation.

Trump lashed out at the women during a Wednesday press conference while acknowledging his personal experience with allegations of sexual misconduct — he has denied accusations from more than a dozen women — has shaped his perspective on Kavanaugh.

"What they've done to this man is incredible," the president declared in New York. "It's a big, fat con job."

Trump also described the uptick of allegations of sexual misconduct allegations in the #MeToo era as "a very dangerous period in our country."

"This is beyond Supreme Court," he said. "This is everything to do with our country. When you are guilty until proven incident, it's just not supposed to be that way."

Jennifer Pierotti, co-founder of Republican Women for Progress, disagrees with the Republican president's assessment. She's frustrated with their party's moves on Kavanaugh and the absence of Republican women on the Judiciary Committee.

"They never really invested in getting more women into the pipeline to run for office," Pierotti said. "When you don't do any of those things for a long enough time, you're not going to have women at the table on the Republican side when you're coming up with policies or you're making big decisions."

For now, the GOP is moving forward quickly.

Procedural votes on Kavanaugh's appointment to the Supreme Court could come as early as Saturday. Activists are urging the party to slow down.

"It's never too late" for Republican leaders to begin to repair their strained relationship with women, said Toni Van Pelt, president of the National Organization for Women, who declared that men like Kavanaugh "don't care about women."

"The way they can make amends is by canceling the hearing, by admitting it's a sham, by admitting they have disrespected women their entire lifetimes," Van Pelt told The Associated Press.

The Republican Party's problem with women began long before Trump's rise.

It hit a low point after conservatives blocked the Equal Rights Amendment in the late 1970s, fell lower in the early 1990s after Republicans grilled Anita Hill about sexual harassment claims against Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas, and fell yet again in 2014 after one Republican Senate candidate raised the prospect of "legitimate rape."

The GOP's relationship with women may have hit rock bottom in 2016 after Republicans elected a president who bragged on video about grabbing women by their genitals.

More women supported Democrats than Republicans for the first time in the 1980 presidential election — a phenomenon commonly referred to as a "gender gap." The disparity repeated itself for the first time in a midterm election in 1986, said University of Virginia professor Jennifer Lawless.

With few exceptions, Democrats have enjoyed a significant gender gap ever since. In the 2016 presidential election, for example, 54 percent of women backed Democrat Hillary Clinton while 41 supported Trump, according to exit polls.

While Trump survived the 13-point gap, Republican strategists are particularly concerned about the shift in college-educated white women, who play an outsized role in the suburban districts that will decide the House majority this fall.

While Clinton won a narrow majority of the demographic in 2016, polling suggests that the overwhelming majority of college-educated white women now hold an unfavorable view of Trump and his party. The most recent Gallup poll shows that 35 percent of women nationwide approve of Trump.

At the same time, men appear to be leaving the Democratic Party.

A Reuters/Ipsos polls earlier in the year found white millennial men who favored Democrats by a significant margin in 2016 now favor Republicans. Chris Wilson, a Republican pollster working on several campaigns this fall, has found a similar phenomenon.

"The Republican Party has less of a problem with women than the Democratic Party has with men," Wilson said.

GOP leaders have particularly seized on a second accuser who named Kavanaugh after admitting she spent several days working to recall the decades-old episode.

Republican political analyst Mona Charen, who was booed at a conservative conference earlier this year for criticizing Trump's questionable background with women, said the second allegation against Kavanaugh "looked like a political hit" and "does a real disservice to women who are victims."

Still, she said the Republican Party has moved sharply in the wrong direction with women by embracing Trump.

"They've endorsed and circled the wagons around Donald Trump, which sends a very, very bad signal," Charen said. "They've signed on with someone who was like from the Rat Pack of the 1950s. Those are his values. He's like the Hugh Hefner of politics."

For now, Trump and his Republican allies in Congress are downplaying their challenge with women.

In New York, the president falsely claimed he won the female vote in the 2016 election and suggested that women actually support the GOP approach on Kavanaugh.

"Women are so angry," Trump said. "And I frankly think, I think they like what the Republicans are doing."

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 Next > End >>

Page 1127 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN