RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
FOCUS: GOP Leaders Won't Tolerate Trump's Chaos for Much Longer Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=6853"><span class="small">Frank Rich, New York Magazine</span></a>   
Saturday, 22 December 2018 11:47

Rich writes: "The beginning of the end of the Trump presidency came and went a long time ago. I have never wavered from my oft-stated convictions that (a) Trump will not finish out his term, and (b), the end will be triggered by a presidential meltdown that forces the Vichy Republicans in Washington to mount an insurrection."

They can put up with a lot, but now he's threatening their donors' bottom line. (photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
They can put up with a lot, but now he's threatening their donors' bottom line. (photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)


GOP Leaders Won't Tolerate Trump's Chaos for Much Longer

By Frank Rich, New York Magazine

22 December 18

 

ost weeks, New York Magazine writer-at-large Frank Rich speaks with contributor Alex Carp about the biggest stories in politics and culture. Today, the consequences of Trump’s erratic moves at home and abroad.

With the harsh words of Secretary of Defense James Mattis’s resignation, the unexpected withdrawal from Syria, and the about-face toward a looming government shutdown, some close to President Trump’s Washington feel like we’ve been thrown back into the chaotic early days of the administration, while others worry that “the wheels may be coming off.” Is it right to read this as the beginning of the end?

The beginning of the end of the Trump presidency came and went a long time ago. I have never wavered from my oft-stated convictions that (a) Trump will not finish out his term, and (b), the end will be triggered by a presidential meltdown that forces the Vichy Republicans in Washington to mount an insurrection — if only to save their own asses, not the country. This week was a big step toward that endgame, and surely one of the most remarkable weeks in American history.

We have a president of the United States who is moving to shut down the government at the same moment that he is inviting America’s adversaries to breach its defenses. The withdrawals in Syria and Afghanistan, combined with the exit of the last top administration official who aspired to serve the national interest rather than Trump’s, invites hostile moves against the United States from ISIS, Russia, China, North Korea, and the Taliban. This has even grabbed the cynical Mitch McConnell’s attention: He has declared himself “distressed” by Mattis’s resignation, a major step in rhetorical escalation in a party where Susan Collins’s pathetic periodic expressions of “concern” are what pass for criticism of an outlaw president. Marco Rubio’s words were stronger, a move to protect his viability for another presidential run, but more outrage from more GOP leaders will follow. What will move them is not necessarily Trump’s hara-kiri isolationist agenda but the damage his behavior both abroad and at home is inflicting on the financial markets. The sheer uncertainty of a chaos presidency is pushing the Dow to its worst December since the Great Depression. McConnell and his humiliated departing peer Paul Ryan have tolerated Trump’s racism, misogyny, and nativism, his wreckage of American alliances, his kleptocracy, and his allegiance to Vladimir Putin. They have tolerated as well his con job on the coal miners, steelworkers, and automobile-industry workers of his base. But they’ll be damned if they will stand for a president who threatens the bottom line of the GOP donor class.

The Mattis resignation is huge. It’s not that he was the last “adult in the room” but that as a retired military man and a secretary of Defense with access to both foreign intelligence and the inner workings of the White House, he knows treason when he sees it. His resignation letter stops just short of saying that Trump is actively serving the “interests” of China and Russia as they try “to shape a world consistent with their authoritarian model.” Certainly it is extraordinary that Trump consulted with the Turkish dictator Recep Tayyip Erdogan when making his abrupt move in Syria but did not bother to consult the American general, Joseph Dunford, who serves as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. For all we know, Trump also was directly or indirectly in touch with Putin, the most vocal defender of his actions.

What happens now? Surely the best fit for next secretary of Defense — one who aligns with Trump’s interests — is Erik Prince, whose security firm, then known as Blackwater, carried out a massacre of Iraqi civilians in Baghdad in 2007. Prince is Betsy DeVos’s brother, an advocate of privatizing the military, and has caught Robert Mueller’s attention for his own alleged role in Russian collusion with the Trump campaign. But I speak in jest. Prince could never get through a confirmation process now, and who knows where America will be or who will be in charge by the time we get to Mattis’s announced February departure date, more than two months from now. The country is going to be riveted by the televised testimony of lawyered-up Trump lackeys as they face the inquisitors of Nancy Pelosi’s Congress.

What we are likely to see in the meantime: further indictments of Trump family members and other close associates; a complete halt to governance in Washington whether there’s actually a government shutdown or not; new overt and covert threats to national security; a further effort by Trump to destabilize the Federal Reserve and assault its chairman; and perhaps, at last, an intervention by those Vichy Republicans, in the financial sector as well as in the capital, who see their own necks on the line.

But meanwhile, we have more than two weeks in store of watching an isolated madman rampaging through the gilded rooms of Mar-a-Lago, wreaking whatever damage he can on the country as the walls of justice continue to close in on him. Happy New Year!

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Harold Koh's Verdict on Donald Trump vs. International Law Print
Friday, 21 December 2018 13:35

Toobin writes: "A friend recently challenged Harold Hongju Koh to sum up his new book, 'The Trump Administration and International Law,' in three words. Koh paused for a minute and said, 'He's not winning.'"

Donald Trump at the UN. (photo: ABC)
Donald Trump at the UN. (photo: ABC)


Harold Koh's Verdict on Donald Trump vs. International Law

By Jeffrey Toobin, The New Yorker

21 December 18

 

friend recently challenged Harold Hongju Koh to sum up his new book, “The Trump Administration and International Law,” in three words. Koh paused for a minute and said, “He’s not winning.”

A longtime professor at and a former dean of Yale Law School, as well as the legal adviser to the State Department during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary, Koh has an improbably sunny demeanor, considering that he has devoted his career to the frequently dispiriting field of international human-rights law. His new book is written in the same optimistic vein, as he explained to a skeptical audience at New York University Law School the other day. President Trump, Koh avers, has failed in virtually every foreign-policy initiative in his first two years in office. And that, to Koh’s mind, is a fortunate thing indeed.

As Koh sees it, Trump views foreign policy as a series of deals rather than relationships. The President’s “America First” approach, Koh writes, has led to a “systematic disengagement with nearly all institutions of global governance.” But Trump has run into what Koh calls the “transnational legal process”—the series of norms, some codified in national or international law, that govern the behavior of nations. Even Trump’s bombast has not altered the “patterns of obedience” that his own country, as well as others around the world, have honored in the post–Second World War era.

Take the matter of immigration. Shortly after Trump took office, he issued a ban on travel to the United States from several predominantly Muslim countries. As Koh details in the book, there was a ferocious response from various players in the transnational legal process. Lawyers sued; individuals protested at airports and in the streets; politicians stepped forward. Some of the lawsuits succeeded, and the Trump Administration was forced to revise the ban twice, with the final version winning a narrow victory in the Supreme Court earlier this year. Koh disagrees with the Supreme Court ruling, but he notes that the Travel Ban 3.0 was a dramatically less bad rule than the original version, thanks to the legal process.

Trump’s contempt for international agreements has also limited the impact of his withdrawals from the Iran nuclear deal and from the Paris climate accord. The Iran deal was a multilateral agreement with six other countries and the European Union; only the United States has withdrawn. Iran is still honoring its commitment to suspending the development of nuclear weapons, and the other parties, in response, have begun opening up trade with it. “The other parties to the deal—the Europeans, the Russians, and the Chinese—will not default on their political obligations just because Donald Trump wants to tear the deal up,” Koh writes. The Iran deal lives on, but Trump has neutralized the ability of the United States to affect the terms of it. Likewise, with the Paris accord on climate change, Trump has announced that his Administration will leave, but, under the terms of the agreement, he cannot actually remove the United States until November of 2020—just a couple of months before the next President, as Koh hopes there will be, can bring the country back in. Meanwhile, other countries remain part of the Paris process and are (mostly) working to honor their commitments on climate change.

Trump’s blunderbuss dealings with North Korea—threats of “fire and fury” followed by what he has described as falling “in love” with the dictator Kim Jong-un—have left relations between the two nations, in Koh’s view, pretty much where they were when Trump took office. Like the past several Presidents, Trump is urging China, North Korea’s patron, to push it to limit and ultimately remove its nuclear weapons. So far, notwithstanding the high-profile summit between the two leaders in Singapore, last June, Trump doesn’t seem to be doing any better than his predecessors. The long stalemate on North Korean nukes endures.

Koh’s point is not that America’s place in the world is secure, or that our influence is positive or even benign; rather, he is simply making the case against panic and despair. Trump’s incompetence, and the resilience of domestic and international institutions, have held his worst qualities at bay. But Koh has an important caveat to the tempered optimism that characterizes his book. “We can survive four years of Trump,” Koh told the group at N.Y.U. “But I am far less confident that we can survive eight years of him.”

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Judges Check Trump's Immigration Cruelty Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=23770"><span class="small">Editorial Board, The New York Times</span></a>   
Friday, 21 December 2018 13:35

Excerpt: "The courts make clear that Trump's policies go beyond the law."

Andrea Elena Castro, daughter of Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-TX, holds a U.S. flag during a Rally For Our Children event on May 31 to protest the 'zero tolerance' immigration policy that has led to the separation of families. (photo: Eric Gay/AP)
Andrea Elena Castro, daughter of Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-TX, holds a U.S. flag during a Rally For Our Children event on May 31 to protest the 'zero tolerance' immigration policy that has led to the separation of families. (photo: Eric Gay/AP)


Judges Check Trump's Immigration Cruelty

By Editorial Board, The New York Times

21 December 18


The courts make clear that his policies go beyond the law.

day after a federal judge denounced the former Trump adviser Michael Flynn, at a sentencing hearing, for lying to F.B.I. agents, the judge had a similar message on Wednesday for former Attorney General Jeff Sessions: Follow the law. It was one of two court decisions this week making clear that the administration was overstepping its powers to restrict the granting of asylum.

The ruling on Wednesday involved then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions’s decision in June to bar immigrants from seeking asylum based on their fears of domestic violence and gangs, basically putting them on a fast track for deportation back to the dangers they had fled. Mr. Sessions had said that “the mere fact that a country may have problems effectively policing certain crimes” shouldn’t be grounds for asylum.

The judge, Emmet Sullivan of the Federal District Court in Washington, all but accused Mr. Sessions of taking the law into his own hands. By creating a system that categorically denied these claims, the judge wrote, “the Attorney General has failed to stay within the bounds of his statutory authority.”

Email This Page

READ MORE

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The Caravan of Resistance Print
Friday, 21 December 2018 13:35

Taracena writes: "For Central Americans fleeing homophobic and transphobic violence, heading North is an act of resistance."

Kevelin, center, holding a sign that reads 'trans women belong here.' After the march, Arcoíris 17 held a press conference in front of the border fence in Nogales, Sonora. (photo: María Inés Taracena)
Kevelin, center, holding a sign that reads 'trans women belong here.' After the march, Arcoíris 17 held a press conference in front of the border fence in Nogales, Sonora. (photo: María Inés Taracena)


The Caravan of Resistance

By María Inés Taracena, NACLA

21 December 18


For Central Americans fleeing homophobic and transphobic violence, heading North is an act of resistance—from our winter 2018 issue, Women Rising in the Americas.

fter nearly two years of working at a pharmacy, Jerson—whose last name won’t be disclosed for safety reasons—was fired after telling his employer’s doctor that he is gay. Shortly after, Jerson’s brother was murdered by a local gang. Death threats followed Jerson and his other siblings, driving his family to move from their home in San Pedro Sula to another region of Honduras.

In Honduras, Jerson explains that most gay men “live hidden.” He says, “I don’t want to live a life where I’m in the closet. My only difference is that I like men. But I can study. I can work. I can have a family. I want to be someone in life. My country has taken away that opportunity, so I have to find it elsewhere.”

For LGBTI+ people living in conservative countries like Honduras, where most hate crimes go unpunished, the risks of unemployment, homelessness, lack of access to health care, and education are even greater.German Mendoza, a San Pedro Sula-based LGBTI+ human rights advocate and core member of CATTRACHAS, a Honduran lesbian-feminist grassroots organization, explains that when a person can no longer live a dignified existence in their home country, their only alternative is to migrate. “Health care, education, work, family … when each of those roots disappear, you start losing your attachment to a place,” Mendoza says. “When you stop having a purpose for staying, you leave.” For LGBTI+ people living in conservative countries like Honduras, where most hate crimes go unpunished, the risks of unemployment, homelessness, lack of access to health care, and education are even greater.

In fact, CATTRACHAS’ research shows that from 2009 to mid-2018, 296 LGBTI+ people were killed in Honduras. This rate is up from just 20 documented killings between 1994 and 2009, according to research by Honduran LGBTI+ activist Nelson Arambú, who himself died in 2015. Increasingly since the 2009 U.S.-backed coup in Honduras, Indigenous activists, land and water protectors, women, and LGBTI+ communities have been brutally targeted by the violence and militarization unleashed in Honduras.

Organizations like CATTRACHAS and the Consejo Cívico de Organizaciones Populares e Indígenas de Honduras (Council of Popular and Indigenous Organizations of Honduras), founded by Indigenous activist Berta Cáceres, who was murdered in 2016, are at the forefront of social and political change in the country. As violence has intensified since 2009, so has resistance.

Jerson did not want to leave his home country. He wanted to nurture life amid familiar streets and faces. But the radical act of leaving was his only remaining choice, an act of survival. Jerson left for the first time in 2015. He was apprehended in Texas, where he tried to apply for asylum in the United States. Instead, he found himself in immigration detention for nearly a year and was then deported. Upon his return to Honduras, he learned his father had been killed.

When Jerson tried to apply for asylum in the U.S. again, in 2017, it was with Arcoíris 17 (Rainbow 17), the first caravan of trans-gay migrants from Central America (and one from southern Mexico.) The caravan members nicknamed Jerson el guerrero—the warrior.

La 72 is one of the only migrant shelters in Mexico that welcomes LGBTI+ people and dedicates specific resources for them.Most members of Arcoíris 17 met at La 72, a migrant shelter in Tenosique, Tabasco, on the Mexico- Guatemala border. La 72 is one of the only migrant shelters in Mexico that welcomes LGBTI+ people and dedicates specific resources for them. Nakai Flotte and Irving Mondragón, volunteers at La 72, were the main organizers of Arcoíris 17 and co-founders of the LGBTI+ collective Diversidad Sin Fronteras (Diversity Without Borders).

Arcoíris 17 faced multiple dangers in Mexico. Yet by July 2017, after weeks of travel, Jerson and the other members of the caravan arrived to Nogales, Sonora.

On August 10, they presented themselves to U.S. immigration officials to apply for asylum.

As Jerson prepared to turn himself in with Arcoíris 17, memories of his first time in a U.S. detention center resurfaced. “I wouldn’t even leave my cell. They mess with your mind,” he says. “Knowing this process could last six months, up to three years. Three years of my life doing what? Not doing anything? What about my goals? What about my dreams? [The lawyers] explained [to] us the process, but I still wanted to do it, because I want to live.”

When a person turns themselves in at a U.S.-Mexico port of entry to apply for asylum, they are immediately put into immigrant detention. If they pass a credible fear interview, which determines whether a person can prove that their life is at risk for their political views, religious beliefs, sexual orientation, or gender identity, asylum hearings eventually begin. On average, the asylum process takes six months to complete, according to U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services, if the person applying has legal representation. However, for some, the process can take years.

Asylum seekers can request parole in order to fight their cases outside of detention. This usually requires that the person has a sponsor in the United States who can provide them with a temporary home while their asylum case is resolved. If they are denied parole, some are able to request a bond hearing after six months in detention. These decisions roll out in a case-by-case basis and are up to the discretion of immigration judges and officials.

By 1 PM on August 10, 16 members of Arcoíris 17, including Jerson, were in the custody of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in Nogales, Arizona. (A last member, Edwin, didn’t arrive to the border until a few days later.) The caravan members were transferred from Arizona and split up across two separate detention centers in New Mexico. Jerson and the other five gay men in the caravan—José, Josué, Jaime, Edwin and Miguel—were sent to Otero County Detention Center, about an hour and a half north of El Paso, Texas. The caravan’s 11 transgender women— Kevelin, Joselyn, Kataleya, Génesis, Estefany, Natalia, Valeria, Monika, Sharom, Eléctrica and Adriana— were sent to Cibola County Correctional Center, an hour west of Albuquerque.

“To us, seeking this protection is not a crime,” says Joselyn, who is from the Miskito Coast in Nicaragua. [Her last name will also be withheld for safety reasons]. “The day we turned ourselves in … we were treated like animals. Put in a cold room with only an aluminum blanket to cover ourselves. We were handcuffed at the wrists, the hips and ankles. We didn’t eat all day.”

While in detention, Joselyn says she was placed in solitary confinement twice, once for eight consecutive days. For Joselyn, a survivor of a kidnapping in Mexico, being locked up in a windowless cell was especially traumatic.

A nationwide campaign led by Arcoíris 17 organizers Flotte and Mondragón, immigration attorneys who provided legal aid, and sponsors who wrote countless letters of support, succeeded in helping get most of the caravanners out of detention. Within a month, 10 of the transgender women of Arcoíris 17 were released on parole. Although caravanners and supporters were hopeful in the beginning of the process, this success seemed unimaginable in the era of Trump. “The caravan’s impact was huge, even more so when our chicas trans accomplished their objectives, to get parole,” says Mondragón.

Jerson and the other five gay caravanners held at Otero were denied parole. “Their spirits were crushed,” Mondragón says. Within days, three of them were forced to sign their deportation orders. Jerson and Edwin stayed to hear the results of their asylum cases.

Unity Builds Strength

Back in 2007, Kevelin, one of the members of the caravan, made it to U.S. soil from Honduras for the first time. She wanted to apply for asylum but was denied after not passing her credible fear interview because she couldn’t “prove” her gender identity or sexual orientation. She was sent to a detention center, where she says she was placed into solitary confinement for months without explanation. “It’s a living hell,” Kevelin says.

Kevelin, like Jerson, was fearful about facing a second asylum process. But on that warm August day in 2017, Kevelin marched side-by-side with her companion of more than five years, José, her Arcoíris 17 family, and a group of caravan supporters who marched on both sides of the Arizona-Mexico border. Undocumented allies who couldn’t cross into Nogales, Sonora, marched across the fence in Nogales, Arizona. As she marched, Kevelin held a sign that read, “las mujeres trans pertenecen aquí” (trans women belong here). A white flower adorned her hair. José wore a tiara.

Kevelin and José had fled death threats in Honduras. They first crossed into Guatemala, where they faced verbal abuse and were denied employment for being trans, gay, and undocumented. They eventually made it to southern Mexico. “We were assaulted when we first arrived to Mexico,” Kevelin says. “Three individuals beat us. We were stoned in Tapachula. A stone hit me in the back, I thought my heart was going to burst out of my chest. I didn’t think Mexico was the same as [Honduras], but it’s terrible.”

One of Kevelin’s breast implants burst after the beating. Oil leaked inside her body for months. When Kevelin arrived to Nogales, Sonora, she urgently needed surgery. But aside from a bag of medicines at the local pharmacy, Kevelin was denied medical attention in Mexico. She was also denied health care at the Cibola County Correctional Center in New Mexico. In detention, the oil leaked and leaked, as her health deteriorated.

In the U.S. detention center, Kevelin felt that the only way to save herself was to return to a place where she also faced threats to her life.Merely days before the rest of the chicas trans, as they refer to themselves, were freed on parole, Kevelin signed her deportation order. In the U.S. detention center, Kevelin felt that the only way to save herself was to return to a place where she also faced threats to her life. She also has two young children and a supportive mother, whom she terribly missed. José went back too. The last that was heard of them was that they were hiding in a basement in Honduras, as rumors of their return spread quickly to the men who threatened their lives.

CATTRACHAS member German Mendoza investigated the number of killings in Honduras of LGBTI+ asylum seekers who have been deported from the U.S. between 2013 and 2017. He found 34 cases.

A Wall in Mexico

While the members of Arcoirís 17 faced threats in their home countries, in U.S. detention centers, including the possibility of being deported, the bulk of the dangers they encountered occurred while crossing through Mexico. The immense Mexican territory has served as a barrier between Central American asylum seekers and el norte.

Programs like Plan Frontera Sur, enacted in 2014 and partially funded by the U.S. government, have led to a stronger presence of military and immigration checkpoints throughout southern and central Mexico, forcing people to take remote and more dangerous routes, as organized crime attempts to exploit them.

As of 2018, there are an estimated 70,000 Central American disappeared people in Mexico, according to Movimiento Migrante Mesoamericano (Mesoamerican Migrant Movement), which also organized the Caravana de Madres de Migrantes Desaparecidos (Caravan of Mothers of Disappeared Migrants)—caravans of Central American mothers who, since 2004, have demanded answers from the Mexican government of their children’s whereabouts. Facing immigration enforcement in Mexico is as deadly for Central Americans as crossing the Sonoran Desert with limited water and three-digit summer temperatures.

The report, citing research by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, finds that two-thirds of LGBTI+ asylum seekers coming from the Northern Triangle suffered sexual and gender-based violence in Mexico after crossing the border.A 2017 Amnesty International report states that human rights violations are often reported against migrants and asylum seekers, including robberies and kidnappings by organized crime, sometimes in collusion with security forces and Mexican migration agencies. The report, citing research by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, finds that two-thirds of LGBTI+ asylum seekers coming from the Northern Triangle suffered sexual and gender-based violence in Mexico after crossing the border.

For Joselyn, crossing Mexico on her own meant facing the dangers of sex trafficking. Joselyn left Nicaragua in 2012. She journeyed through Central America on her own, until reaching the Guatemala- Mexico border. Joselyn crossed into Chiapas with a small group of Honduran and Salvadoran asylum seekers. At one point, Joselyn’s partner, Miguel, who she met at the Guatemala-Mexico border, and the rest of the group separated. Miguel headed north and successfully crossed into the United States, Joselyn says, where they planned to reunite. Joselyn lived in Mexico City for a couple of years, she says.

When she was able to reunite with Miguel, Joselyn traveled west to the state of Jalisco, where she was kidnapped and sex trafficked for three months. “They would prostitute me. They would give me drugs. They would force me to sell drugs,” Joselyn says. In fact, the state of Jalisco has often been labeled by Mexican media as a “paradise” for human trafficking. Cities like Guadalajara and Puerto Vallarta are known destinations for sex tourism, with local and migrant women, transgender women, and youth the most vulnerable to trafficking. Sadly, cases like Joselyn’s are not uncommon.

After a few months, Joselyn says she was able to communicate with Miguel. He came back to help her, thereby deporting himself. Law enforcement raided the house where Joselyn was held, inadvertently rescuing her and a handful of other women, she says. Joselyn says the men who kidnapped her are “looking for us … they said they would shoot us in the head.”

Click here to read the rest of this article, available open access for a limited time

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: None of Us Deserve Citizenship Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=23981"><span class="small">Michelle Alexander, The New York Times</span></a>   
Friday, 21 December 2018 12:22

Alexander writes: "On what moral grounds can we deny others rights, privileges and opportunities that we did not earn ourselves?"

Members of the caravan of thousands from Central America trying to reach the United States, at the border wall in Tijuana, Mexico, last week. (photo: Carlos Garcia Rawlins/Reuters)
Members of the caravan of thousands from Central America trying to reach the United States, at the border wall in Tijuana, Mexico, last week. (photo: Carlos Garcia Rawlins/Reuters)


None of Us Deserve Citizenship

By Michelle Alexander, The New York Times

21 December 18


On what moral grounds can we deny others rights, privileges and opportunities that we did not earn ourselves?

ate last month, 19-year-old Maryury Elizabeth Serrano-Hernandez reportedly scaled a wall along the United States-Mexico border while eight months pregnant and gave birth within hours of placing her feet on American soil. She was part of a widely publicized Central American caravan and traveled more than 2,000 miles from Honduras propelled by the dream of giving her new baby, as well as her 3-year-old son, a life free from the violence and grinding poverty she endured back home. She views her child’s birth in the United States as a “big reward” for her courage, perseverance and faith. As she explained to Univision, which documented parts of her family’s journey, “With faith in God, I always said my son will be born there.”

For some Americans, Ms. Serrano-Hernandez’s story is nothing short of heroic, given the suffering she endured and the extraordinary obstacles she overcame to give her children a chance at a better life. For others, her story represents everything that’s wrong with our immigration system. The Border Patrol said that Ms. Serrano-Hernandez and her family were released on their own recognizance. Her newborn is, for many, just another “anchor baby,” proof that a more aggressive and unforgiving approach to illegal immigration is warranted and that Trump is right to call for an end to birthright citizenship.

No matter what side of the debate one gravitates toward, stories like Ms. Serrano-Hernandez’s highlight the moral quagmire that we’ve created by treating the migration of desperately poor people as a problem that can best be addressed by border walls, tear gas, detention camps, militarized policing and mass deportation — except, of course, for the relative few, truly “deserving” individuals who may be granted legal citizenship (typically after years of waiting and hundreds or thousands of dollars in attorney’s fees) if they can win asylum.

Email This Page

READ MORE

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 Next > End >>

Page 1037 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN