RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
FOCUS: The Day After Kerouac Died Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=51900"><span class="small">Allen Ginsberg, The New Yorker</span></a>   
Sunday, 20 October 2019 11:46

Ginsberg writes: "At dusk I went out to the pasture and saw thru Kerouac's eyes the sun set on October universe, the first sun set on the first dusk after his death. Didn't live much longer than beloved Neal - another year and half."

Kerouac in Tompkins Square Park, 1953. (photo: Allen Ginsberg Collection/New Yorker)
Kerouac in Tompkins Square Park, 1953. (photo: Allen Ginsberg Collection/New Yorker)


The Day After Kerouac Died

By Allen Ginsberg, The New Yorker

20 October 19


Fifty years ago, Allen Ginsberg recorded his thoughts about the death of his friend Jack Kerouac, and began writing a new poem.

n the evening of October 21, 1969, Allen Ginsberg received a telephone call from the journalist Al Aronowitz: Jack Kerouac had died, earlier that day, in a Florida hospital. For Ginsberg, it was the second such call in just over a year and a half. On February 10, 1968, he had learned that Neal Cassady, the inspiration for “On the Road” and, aside from Kerouac, Ginsberg’s closest friend, had died, in Mexico.

The Kerouac news deeply saddened Ginsberg but did not surprise him. Kerouac’s heavy drinking over the previous decade had increased to such an extent that his closest friends wondered if he had a death wish. Ginsberg and Kerouac had grown distant—largely because Kerouac had become less and less available to Ginsberg, but also because Ginsberg no longer wished to be around his old friend, who, on any given night, could be a belligerent, unhappy, argumentative, and nasty drunk. Kerouac had remarried, bought a house for his wife and his invalid mother, and moved to Florida, where he lived a semi-reclusive life.

Immediately after hearing the news of Kerouac’s death, this was not the man Ginsberg remembered. He recalled the joyful, enthusiastic, ambitious, prodigious writer whose work influenced his own. Kerouac had basked in the heat of spontaneity; he had put Ginsberg on the path to Buddhism; the two had shared their innermost thoughts. His intelligence had been a beacon.

Ginsberg recorded fragments of his thoughts and memories of Kerouac in his journals, as he had done when he learned of Cassady’s death. He also wrote a long poem, “Memory Gardens,” which was composed over several sittings and was eventually included in his National Book Award-winning volume, “The Fall of America,” which was published in 1973.

Those initial journal entries are presented here on the fiftieth anniversary of Jack Kerouac’s death.

— Michael Schumacher

 

Oct 22 130AM 1969

Two watches ticking in the dark, fly buzz at the black window, telephone calls all day to Florida and Old Saybrook, Lucien, Creeley, Louis, —“drinking heavily” and “your letter made him feel bad,” said Stella.

All last nite (as talking on farm w/ Creeley day before) in bed brooding re Kerouac’s “After Me, the Deluge” at middle of morning watch I woke realizing he was right, that the meat suffering in the middle of existence was a sensitive pain greater than any political anger or hope, as I also lay in bed dying

Walking with Gregory in bare treed October ash woods—winds blowing brown sere leafs at feet—talking of dead Jack—the sky an old familiar place with fragrant eyebrow clouds passing overhead in Fall Current—

He saw them stand on the moon too.

At dusk I went out to the pasture & saw thru Kerouac’s eyes the sun set on October universe, the first sun set on the first dusk after his death.

Didn’t live much longer than beloved Neal—another year & half—

Gregory woke at midnite to cry—he didn’t really want to go so soon—from the attick—

His mind my mind many ways—“The days of my youth rise fresh in my mind”—

Our talk 25 years ago about saying farewell to the tender mortal steps of Union Theological Seminary 7th floor where I first met Lucien—

Tonite on phone Lucien said, having quit drinking in [Indecipherable] several weeks ago, he’d had convulsions split his nose & broke out all his false front teeth, chewed his tongue almost in half—unconscious taken to hospital—

Jack had vomited blood this last weekend would not take doctor care, hemorrhaged, & with many dozen transfusions lay in hospital a day before dying operated under knife in stomach—

 

Oct 22—

Memory Gardens

Covered with yellow leaves

in morning rain

 

Oct 24 — Quel Deluge

He threw up his hands

& wrote the universe dont exist

& died to prove it.

[Indecipherable stanza]

Full Moon over Ozone Park

Bus rushing thru dusk to

Manhattan,

Jack the Wizard in his

grave at Lowell

for the first nite—

that Jack thru whose eyes I

saw

smog glory light

gold over Manhattan’s spires

will never see these

chimneys smoking

anymore over statues of Mary

in the graveyard

Truck beds packed

under bridge viaducts,

Crash jabber of

Columbia Free—

Black Misted Canyons

rising over the bleak

river

Bright doll-like ads

For Esso Bread—

Replicas multiplying beards—

Farewell to the cross—

Under the river lights shaft

shelfing on Ceramic tunnel

Eternal fixity, the big

headed wax Buddha doll

pale resting incoffined—

Empty skulled New

York streets

Starveling phantoms

filling city—

Wax dolls walking park

Ave.,

Light gleam in eye glass—

Voice echoing thru Microphones

Grand Central Sailor’s

arrival 2 decades later

feeling melancholy—

Nostalgia for Innocent World

War II—

A million Corpses running

across 42’d Street,

The glass building rising higher

& lighted, transparent

aluminum

artificial trees,

robot sofas,

Ignorant cars—

One Way Street to Heaven.

[Indecipherable two lines]

 

Oct 25, ’69

Gray Subway Roar

A wrinkled brown faced fellow

blue-capped, with swollen hands

leans to the blinking void, plate glass

[Indecipherable]

sways on tracks uptown to Columbia—

Jack no more’ll step off at Penn Station

anonymous erranded, to eat sandwich

& drink beer near New Yorker Hotel

or walk

under the shadow of Empire State Building.

Didn’t we stare at each other length of the car

& read headlines in faces thru Newpaper Holes?

Sexual cocked & horny bodied young, look

at beauteous Rimbaud & sweet Jenny

riding to class from Columbus Circle

“Here the kindly dopefiend lived.”

and the rednecked sheriff beat the longhaired

boy on the ass.

—103’d St, me & Hal abused for begging.

Can I go back in time & lay my head on a teenage

belly upstairs on 110’th st?

or step off the iron car with Jack

at the blue-tiled Columbia stop?

at last the old brown station

where I had a holy vision’s been

rebuilt & changed by clean grey tile

over the scum & spit & come of

a half century.

[next page] [Indecipherable]

 

Oct 29—N.Y. Maine

—SUNSET

I am flying into a trail of Black Smoke

Kerouac’s obituary conserves Time’s

Front Paragraphs—

Empire State in Heaven Sun Set red

White Mist

over the billion trees of the Bronx—

There’s too much to see

Jack saw Sun Set Red over the Hudson Horizon

Two three decades back

thirtynine fortynine fiftynine

sixtynine

John Holmes pursed his lips, cynic

& empty-eyed robot,

and wept tears.

Smoke plumed up from oceanside chimneys

plane roars north over Long Island

Montauk stretched in red sunset—

Northport, in the trees, jack drank

rot gut & maide haikus of birds

tweetling on his porch rail at dawn—

Fell down & saw death’s golden lite

in Florida garden a decade ago.

Now taken utterly, soul upward,

& body down in wood coffin

& concrete slab-box

I threw a kissed handful of damp earth

down on the stone lid

& sighed

Looking in Creeley’s one eye,

Peter sweet holding a flower

Gregory toothless bending his

knuckle to Cinema Machine—

and that’s the end of the drabble tongued

poet who sounded his Kock-rup

throughout the Northwest Passage.

Blue dusk over Saybrook, Holmes

sits down to dine Victorian—

& Time has a Ten Page Spread on

Homosexual-Fairies!

Well, while I’m here I’ll

do the work—

and what’s the work?

To ease the pain of living.

Everything else, drunken

dumbshow.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: There Are Only 5 Candidates Still Standing After the Latest Democratic Debate Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=6853"><span class="small">Frank Rich, New York Magazine</span></a>   
Sunday, 20 October 2019 10:28

Rich writes: "The opening question, a softball about impeachment, allowed every last one of the 12 candidates on the overcrowded stage to tell us what we already know: They are all for it! So the advent of the impeachment inquiry per se didn't change anything."

Only two of these three are still viable. (photo: John Minchillo)
Only two of these three are still viable. (photo: John Minchillo)


There Are Only 5 Candidates Still Standing After the Latest Democratic Debate

By Frank Rich, New York Magazine

20 October 19


Most weeks, New York Magazine writer-at-large Frank Rich speaks with contributor Alex Carp about the biggest stories in politics and culture. Today, what last night’s debate tells us about the Democratic field.

ast night was the first Democratic primary debate since Congress opened its official impeachment inquiry of Donald Trump.  Did that change anything?

The opening question, a softball about impeachment, allowed every last one of the 12 candidates on the overcrowded stage to tell us what we already know: They are all for it! So the advent of the impeachment inquiry per se didn’t change anything. But once we moved beyond that dull panorama of like-mindedness, this turned out to be a clarifying debate. By that I don’t mean it was an exciting debate, or an inspiring debate, or a debate that would draw in those Americans (most of them) who don’t want to think about 2020 politics before we get to 2020. But the shape of the Democratic field now seems crystal clear. Tuesday night seemed like a death knell for seven of the dozen candidacies on stage, including Joe Biden’s. It’s time for the actual contenders to go at it on a less cluttered field.

Among the seven also-rans, the low-hanging losers are Beto O’Rourke, Julián Castro, Andrew Yang, Tulsi Gabbard, and Tom Steyer (we hardly knew ye), the billionaire vanity candidate whose main attribute is that at least he is not Howard Schultz. Their time to gain traction in this cycle has come and gone. Obviously O’Rourke and Castro are future prospects, though it may take a while for some Democrats to forgive O’Rourke for his vainglorious decision to run for president rather than to challenge the incumbent John Cornyn in next year’s Texas Senate race.

Cory Booker and Biden, two candidates who’ve always looked highly plausible in theory but repeatedly fail to deliver, are more complicated cases.

Booker is sunny and personable — as unobjectionable as an easy-listening radio host. His upbeat, why-can’t-we-all-get-along shtick is surely sincere, but it’s part of the reason why he’s never risen in the polls: It comes off as empty bombast — cheery bombast, to be sure, but no substitute for substance. In a dark time, voters are not looking for a “politics of joy,” to recall the thesis of Hubert Humphrey’s ill-fated campaign in 1968. And they aren’t looking for rage, a market that has been cornered by Trump in any event. What they are looking for is fight. Booker has yet to show that he has much of that, despite his periodic pumping up of his mellifluous voice to simulate fisticuffs.

In last night’s debate, he also revealed just how hard it is for him to depart from his over-polished prefab scripts. It was somewhat embarrassing when, in an obviously planned bit of grandstanding, he (politely) chastised his rivals for neglecting to talk about how much women’s reproductive rights are under attack — only moments after Kamala Harris had made the exact same point, and stirringly so. Booker’s attempt to concede that she’d upstaged him was awkward (a patronizing “God bless Kamala!”) as was his effort to draw a distinction by congratulating himself on being a man who cares about women’s reproductive rights. (It was just grating enough to recall his mortifying “I am Spartacus” gambit during the Brett Kavanaugh hearings.) In another demonstration of his lack of intellectual agility, he glowingly quoted the former Trump defense secretary, Jim Mattis, while making no reference to Mattis’s recently much-discussed cowardice in failing to speak up about the White House horrors that are at the heart of the impeachment inquiry.

Biden also lacks that intellectual agility. He didn’t repeat the viral glitches of the previous debates. But that’s a low bar to rise above. Like Booker, he seems incapable of the improvisational moves necessary to take on Trump. He ducked a question about why it was okay for Hunter Biden to trade on his name for cushy foreign paydays, however lawfully, and instead repeated an anodyne soundbite three times (“My son’s statement speaks for itself”). This was a lost opportunity because Biden might have joined other Democrats in denouncing the nepotistic follies of his hypocritical Republican critics, notably Donald Trump Jr., Rand Paul, and Liz Cheney. And he might have passionately lit into the criminal White House conspiracy to strongarm foreign governments to soil him and his son. After all, Trump’s assault on the Bidens is the best argument for his candidacy — it makes the case that Joe Biden is the candidate Trump fears the most. But unaccountably Biden has made only fitful use of this political gift horse in the weeks since the Ukraine scandal became front-page news — even as his campaign’s fundraising has wilted.

There were other examples of his lack of improvisational skills as well. After delivering a meaty tirade against the outrage of Trump’s surrender to Erdogan and Assad, he ducked the question of whether he’d send American troops back into the region. He couldn’t stop himself from repeating more than once his newly favored shtick (intended as a stab at Warren) trumpeting himself as the only candidate who’s gotten anything done. That claim is not only false, but is wielded as a dodge to avoid any treacherous policy question. Worse, it left him open to this memorable riposte from Bernie Sanders: “You got the disastrous war in Iraq done.” Sanders damaged Biden in a less explicit way as well. Post–heart attack, he seemed looser, sharper, and less programmed than he did pre–heart attack. He seems younger than Biden though in fact he’s two years his senior. Who would have ever imagined that Bernie Sanders could be a comeback kid?

Among the others still left standing, Kamala Harris remains an enigma. She’s a sharp and tireless prosecutor (as she never hesitates to remind us), capable of real fire when she’s passionate about the subject at hand. But she’s just as often studied and cautious, and you have to wonder about her political acuity when she marshals her considerable resources to push such a marginal, Bay Area–centric crusade as calling upon Twitter to suspend Trump’s account.

As nearly everyone has noted, the two who did themselves the most good last night were Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar, who seized the initiative and poked holes in the best-laid Medicare for All plans of front-runner Elizabeth Warren. Their blows, respectful but firm, landed.

For the first time in a debate, Warren occasionally seemed defensive and misspoke. She will not be able to get away indefinitely with stonewalling Buttigieg’s “yes or no question” about whether her health plan mandates tax increases. At another point, she could be found self-righteously claiming that “everyone else on this stage” wants to protect billionaires even though, as Klobuchar pointed out, even the one billionaire onstage, Steyer, had come out against protecting billionaires.

As of now, Warren remains the best candidate the Democrats have, but she hasn’t closed the deal, and there are plausible alternatives. Talking heads at CNN and elsewhere relentlessly promoted last night’s debate as historic because it was the most presidential candidates ever on a debate stage. But only after a ruthless culling will the campaign finally begin in earnest and real history be made.

But what about Michael Bloomberg? He has begun to float the idea of entering the Democratic primary as a centrist option if Biden falters. Would he be a contender?

At 77, he would at last remedy a glaring shortcoming of the septuagenarian Democratic field by filling the age gap between Biden (76) and Sanders (78). And it would be highly gratifying to see a genuinely successful and accomplished New York billionaire go up against the fraud in the White House. He might drive Trump crazy — that is, crazier — and he could be self-financing to an extent.

The downside? Trump’s revenge, make no mistake about it, would be to further stoke anti-Semitism among his alt-right stormtroopers. And should either Buttigieg, Klobuchar, or Harris catch fire with Biden’s up-for-grabs constituency, a tardy Bloomberg candidacy would be fighting a two-front war against opponents both in the party’s center and on the left. If he really wants to get in when Biden falters, someone should tell him that that time has arrived.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
I Am Officially Endorsing Bernie Sanders for President Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=35918"><span class="small">Michael Moore, Michael Moore's Facebook Page</span></a>   
Sunday, 20 October 2019 08:38

Moore writes: "I am joining Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tomorrow to officially and publicly endorse a true hero of the people, Senator Bernie Sanders, as our next President of the United States! I have supported Bernie for over 30 years."

Michael Moore. (photo: Getty Images)
Michael Moore. (photo: Getty Images)


I Am Officially Endorsing Bernie Sanders for President

By Michael Moore, Michael Moore's Facebook Page

20 October 19

 

am joining Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tomorrow to officially and publicly endorse a true hero of the people, Senator Bernie Sanders, as our next President of the United States! I have supported Bernie for over 30 years. I spoke at his rally in Burlington, VT, when he first ran for Congress. I will speak again tomorrow for him at his “Bernie Is Back!” rally at 1pm in Queensbridge Park in New York City. Everyone is welcome! Everyone who cares about the true direction this country must head in post-Trump should be there if you are within a drive or train ride from NYC. There are many good Democratic candidates running. Every poll shows the top five of them beating Trump in a head-to-head contest. We are all going to vote for whoever wins the nomination. So in the primaries and caucuses, let’s all vote for the candidate who most shares what each of us believes in. For me, that’s Bernie! Because we must not only defeat Trump, we must defeat the rotten system that gave us Trump. I’ll see you tomorrow!

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
AOC and Ilhan Omar Are Anchors of a Movement Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=51898"><span class="small">Kalewold H. Kalewold, Jacobin</span></a>   
Sunday, 20 October 2019 08:38

Kalewold writes: "The news of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's planned endorsement of Sen. Bernie Sanders came as a shock Tuesday night, capping his comeback performance at the fourth Democratic debate."

Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar speak alongside Sen. Bernie Sanders at the US Capitol in June 2019. (photo: Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images)
Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar speak alongside Sen. Bernie Sanders at the US Capitol in June 2019. (photo: Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images)


AOC and Ilhan Omar Are Anchors of a Movement

By Kalewold H. Kalewold, Jacobin

20 October 19


The Bernie Sanders campaign is key to the larger socialist project. By endorsing Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar have positioned themselves as electoral anchors of that movement in the years to come.

he news of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s planned endorsement of Sen. Bernie Sanders came as a shock Tuesday night, capping his comeback performance at the fourth Democratic debate. Many expected she would not endorse at all, or at least not before the New York primary. AOC, some speculated, wouldn’t risk alienating mainstream Democrats who projected their own politics on a young, telegenic woman of color. They were wrong.

Even before his health scare, the pundit class had written off the Sanders campaign. Warren has recently overtaken Biden in most national polls, and the liberal commentariat has come to see her as both the front-runner and the Left’s standard-bearer. With four months to go before a single vote is cast, Sanders was written out of 2020 discussions.

Then came AOC joined by Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib — at a moment that couldn’t have been more precarious. (We now know that, according to Politico, AOC informed Sanders of her decision to join his campaign as he lay in a hospital bed in Nevada recovering from a heart procedure.) Liberal pundits, already equating Warren’s professional-class reformism with Sanders’s working-class radicalism, would have been more than happy to keep promoting AOC, Omar, and Tlaib as political renegades against the status quo even if they had chosen to stay safely on the sidelines. The three representatives could have had the best of both worlds all without taking an enormous political risk. Instead, they took the risk.

But more than providing a great “comeback kid” media narrative, AOC’s endorsement is a testament to the vital importance of the Sanders campaign to the broader left project. After a half-century of political defeat and working-class collapse, it’s clear that we have a once-in-a-generation opportunity. A “good enough” progressive will not do for the severe challenges we face. A Sanders presidency is the only one among the current crop of candidates that could turn the tide.

The United States has had socialist labor leaders, mayors, congressional representatives, and countless activists and cultural denizens. But it has never had a socialist president — nor has it had an executive branch as powerful as the presidency is now in the twenty-first century. Due to many structural and historical strictures, the political configuration that launched socialists to power in nearly every major democracy in the world has so far eluded the United States. It’s not too much to suggest that a different path may be needed to begin a democratic-socialist reckoning here.

A US government helmed by a socialist president presents a unique opportunity for the Left — not because it would ensure democratic-socialist outcomes, but because it is an indispensable first step to rebuilding the political coalition and institutions that can deliver on the Left’s vision.

We have already seen the fruits of a socialist politician’s emergence at the national stage. Sanders’s 2016 run helped galvanize a nascent left movement and catalyze labor and political organizing. By their own accounts, Omar and AOC were inspired to launch their bid in large part by Bernie’s insurgent campaign for the Democratic nomination. Ocasio-Cortez’s unlikely rise as the face of the new Congress, despite Democrats’ victory coming out of flipping affluent suburbs, has shown the possibility of using the Democratic Party to pursue politics by and for the working class. What AOC’s still nascent political career — which began with her work on Sanders’s 2016 campaign — shows is the immense potential having a socialist at the top of the ticket can have in creating the next generation of socialist leaders.

Sanders has promised to be an “organizer-in-chief,” to support workplace democracy and employee ownership, to place Medicare for All and a Green New Deal at the top of his administration’s priorities. With the elections of AOC, Omar, and Rashida Tlaib — and now with them joining Sanders on the campaign trail to transform America — he and they are fighting to deliver on their promises. Something new is taking shape for the American left, a unique opportunity presented by his candidacy to build social democracy in America, rein in the long and destructive arm of American military policy, and unite a durable coalition that can build pro-worker policies for decades to come.

With Ocasio-Cortez’s endorsement of Sanders today and Omar’s and Tlaib’s earlier this week, the three of them have chosen not to take the politically easy path of laying low in the presidential race or endorsing a candidate who is far more palatable to the political establishment. Instead, they’ve thrown in their lots with the rising socialist movement in America and positioned themselves as electoral anchors for that movement in the years to come. And not a moment too soon.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Trump Offers Freed ISIS Fighters a Group Rate at Trump Doral Resort Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=9160"><span class="small">Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker</span></a>   
Saturday, 19 October 2019 14:25

Borowitz writes: "Calling it a 'once-in-a-lifetime incredible deal,' Donald Trump on Friday offered recently-escaped ISIS fighters a group rate at the Trump National Doral Miami."

Islamic State militants. (photo: Andalucia Informacion)
Islamic State militants. (photo: Andalucia Informacion)


Trump Offers Freed ISIS Fighters a Group Rate at Trump Doral Resort

By Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker

19 October 19

 

The article below is satire. Andy Borowitz is an American comedian and New York Times-bestselling author who satirizes the news for his column, "The Borowitz Report."


alling it a “once-in-a-lifetime incredible deal,” Donald Trump on Friday offered recently-escaped ISIS fighters a group rate at the Trump National Doral Miami.

“I am giving ISIS a group rate that entitles them to the full run of the golf course, the spa, you name it,” he said. “This is going to make the ISIS people very, very happy.”

The fighters can qualify for the group rate by presenting proof of ISIS membership and their recently freed status, Trump said.

Trump declined to say whether he would extend the same group rate to Kurdish fighters in Syria. “I’m not a fan of the Kurds,” he said. “Where were the Kurds in 1776 when George Washington took control of the British airports?”

Shortly after Trump made the offer to ISIS, however, the group’s leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, issued a lukewarm response.

“We’ve read some not-so-great things about the Doral on TripAdvisor,” Baghdadi said. “If we wanted to go to a golf resort, we’d pick one that doesn’t have bedbugs.”

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 Next > End >>

Page 719 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN