RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Reporters Face New Threats From the Governments They Cover Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=53099"><span class="small">James Risen, The New York Times</span></a>   
Sunday, 26 January 2020 14:17

Risen writes: "When Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder, was charged last year by the Trump administration in connection with the publication of secret United States government documents nearly a decade earlier, many journalists expressed deep concern about the dangerous precedent the case could set for investigative reporting in America."

Glenn Greenwald is an American journalist working in Brazil. (photo: Adriano Machado/Reuters)
Glenn Greenwald is an American journalist working in Brazil. (photo: Adriano Machado/Reuters)


Reporters Face New Threats From the Governments They Cover

By James Risen, The New York Times

26 January 19


The cases against Julian Assange and Glenn Greenwald may be models for a crackdown.

hen Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder, was charged last year by the Trump administration in connection with the publication of secret United States government documents nearly a decade earlier, many journalists expressed deep concern about the dangerous precedent the case could set for investigative reporting in America.

But few seemed to consider that the case might also serve as a model for other nations eager to clamp down on press freedom.

On Tuesday, Glenn Greenwald, an American journalist living and working in Brazil, was charged, in a criminal complaint brought by Brazilian prosecutors, with cybercrimes in connection with his stories on private messages among Brazilian officials that revealed corruption and abuses at the highest levels of the government. Brazilian prosecutors asserted that Mr. Greenwald was part of a criminal organization that hacked the cellphones of government officials. He has denied the charges. (Full disclosure: Mr. Greenwald is a co-founder of The Intercept, where I work as a reporter; I also run the First Look Press Freedom Defense Fund, part of the nonprofit organization that includes The Intercept.)

READ MORE

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Betsy DeVos Compares Abortion to Slavery, Ayanna Pressley Invites Her to 'Say It to My Face' Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=52792"><span class="small">Zack Linly, The Root</span></a>   
Sunday, 26 January 2020 14:06

Linly writes: "Secretary of Education and Cruella DeVille stunt double Betsy DeVos has shown us time and time again that she isn't the brightest crayon in the box."

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos listens Monday to President Trump during a Cabinet meeting at the White House. (photo: Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP)
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos listens Monday to President Trump during a Cabinet meeting at the White House. (photo: Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP)


Betsy DeVos Compares Abortion to Slavery, Ayanna Pressley Invites Her to 'Say It to My Face'

By Zack Linly, The Root

26 January 19

 

ecretary of Education and Cruella DeVille stunt double Betsy DeVos has shown us time and time again that she isn’t the brightest crayon in the box. We’ve seen her struggle to answer the most basic questions about education and even declared that she does not “intentionally visited schools that are underperforming,” after making it pretty clear she doesn’t know much about schools at all. Because, why should she? She’s only the person put in charge of the quality of our schools.

But white conservative density is something I can handle. It’s even a thing I usually find comical (I mean, not so much when the demonstrably dumb person is in control of education policy...but other times). What I can not stand, though, is white conservatives invoking black oppression in order to bolster their own narratives.

So you can imagine how pissed I was when DeVos found the sheer, unmitigated caucasity to make comparisons between abortion rights and slavery.

According to The Hill, while speaking at an event for Colorado Christian University in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday, DeVos made comments saying that opposition to abortion reminded her of the ending of slavery during former President Lincoln’s administration.

“[Lincoln] too contended with the pro-choice arguments of his day. They suggested that a state’s choice to be slave or to be free had no moral question in it,” DeVos said.

“Well, President Lincoln reminded those pro-choicers that is a vast portion of the American people that do not look upon that matter as being this very little thing. They look upon it as a vast moral evil. Lincoln was right about the slavery ‘choice’ then, and he would be right about the life ‘choice’ today,” she continued. “Because as it’s been said: Freedom is not about doing what we want. Freedom is about having the right to do what we ought.”

It’s bad enough that she’s comparing the non-lives of the non-sentient unborn to the lives of millions who experienced life but lived it in bondage and under servitude, but for this to come from the same woman who pulled back Obama-era policies that protected black students from disproportionately harsh discipline practices makes her words ring especially hollow, if not egregious.

Rep. Ayanna Pressley, like myself, is having none of DeVos’ white nonsense. On Thursday she tweeted that she would love to have a face-to-face with DeVos to educate her on all the ways she doesn’t know what the hell she’s talking about.

“Dear Betsy,” Pressley tweeted. “As a Black woman & the Chair of the abortion access task force, I invite you to come by the Hill and say this to my face.”

“Would welcome the opportunity to educate you,” Pressley continued.

For anyone who isn’t already aware, in the black community, “Say this to my face” isn’t a request; it’s a battle cry. If you ain’t bout that life, don’t you try it.

Presley has always been an advocate for abortion rights. Last year, she commended Massachusetts activists for fighting to enact the ROE Act, which would “improve youth access to abortion and ensure coverage for abortion regardless of income or immigration status,” according to the American Civil Liberties Union.

“Even in states like the commonwealth of Massachusetts, which I represent, individuals, particularly low-income and young people, LGBTQ and black and brown folks continue to face barriers in accessing comprehensive reproductive health care. And let me be clear–health care is abortion care,” Pressley said from the House floor.

DeVos, on the other hand, has a history of, not only seeking to obstruct abortion rights, but of using black struggle to back personal agenda.

In February last year, she drew the ire of black people all over the country when she referred to HBCUs as “pioneers” of the school choice movement as a way of propping up her well known support for school choice, voucher programs and charter schools.

What I find funny about comments invoking slavery and the like when they come from white conservatives is that any other time they’re telling us to get over it because “the past is the past.” Mind you, these are the same people who swear by the Founding Father’s every bowel movement as if their 18th century wisdom and the word of God are one and the same. So for them to tell us that we need to stop talking about slavery while pointing out America’s dark history, and then turn around and use slavery when it’s convenient for their own narratives...

Well that’s just the kind of thing that makes you wish certain people were aborted.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Unknown Saviors of the Environment: Thirty-Five Men Create a Forest From Barren Land Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=53097"><span class="small">Gurvinder Singh, Mongabay</span></a>   
Sunday, 26 January 2020 13:51

Singh writes: "Prinson Daimari is overwhelmed with pride every time he visits the lush green forest with birds' nests perched on the treetops inside the Bhairabkunda reserve forest in Udalguri district of Assam in North East India."

Treehouse constructed by Gethsemane JFMC. (photo: Gethsemane JFMC)
Treehouse constructed by Gethsemane JFMC. (photo: Gethsemane JFMC)


Unknown Saviors of the Environment: Thirty-Five Men Create a Forest From Barren Land

By Gurvinder Singh, Mongabay

26 January 19

 

rinson Daimari is overwhelmed with pride every time he visits the lush green forest with birds’ nests perched on the treetops inside the Bhairabkunda reserve forest in Udalguri district of Assam in North East India.

The 52-year-old stands under a canopy of trees and recalls those days when he, along with his 34 colleagues, spent countless hours shoveling the boulders and stones from beneath the earth to make the barren, sandy land fertile. For a first-time visitor, it is hard to believe that the same stretch of land now boasts of a dense forest spread across 750 hectares, rich in biodiversity, with elephants frequenting the area even during the day.

“We have virtually spent our prime years in converting a barren and uneven land filled with rocks and stones into a picturesque forest inhabited by venomous reptiles and wild animals,” Prinson said with a smile on his face as the sun’s rays try to peek through the tall bamboo trees. “We have not only created a forest but have also set a successful example of environmental conservation through our hard work.”

From stirring a movement to creating a forest

The seeds for creating the dense forest were laid during the late 1980s, when the 35 youths credited for the man-made forest were members of All Bodo Students Union (ABSU), a student organization formed in 1967 to fight for a separate territory, meant to be carved out from Assam state. The Bodos are an ethnic and linguistic community centered on the Udalguri and Kokrajhar districts of the Indian state of Assam.

On February 20, 1993, a Memorandum of Understanding (MoS) was signed between the state government of Assam and the ABSU-Bodo People’s Action Committee (BPAC), restoring some sort of normalcy following the ethnic conflict that began in 1987.

“We were waging a non-violent movement for the separate land but quit the struggle after the accord was signed. We decided to return to our homes and earn livelihood for our families,” said Bilup Daimari, 53, who was also part of the movement. For the next decade, the 35 men did odd jobs to eke out livelihoods, but found it difficult to keep the kitchen fire burning. “We worked in agro farms and did other jobs but it proved to be a daunting task to run our families. We decided to try something else,” Bilup added.

In 2003, the group of men then earmarked land for farming and poultry inside Bhairabkunda reserve forest. “It was a small area in which we decided to do farming and other activities. We had already formed a co-operative and took permission from forest department in this regard. We started with farming, fishing, and also poultry. But it hardly brought any profits because we didn’t have much experience and connection with the local market,” said Alfred Daimari, 54, another member.

As they were pondering over their future, a forest ranger came to their rescue in 2004. He offered them a livelihood opportunity of planting saplings on the barren land inside the forest for the next five years. “We were in desperate need for work and readily agreed. We thought that at least we would be able to sustain our families for the next five years,” Alfred said.

Severe challenges during the implementation

The project to plant saplings over 750 hectares of land eventually kicked off in 2005. “The flash floods of 1989 had caused massive damage and eroded the top soil, exposing the hard rocks beneath the earth,” Prinson said. “It was a challenging task to remove the rocks and turn the land suitable for plantation. But we didn’t give up. We used to peddle or even walk for 7-8 kilometers to reach to the forest for the work.”

He adds: “It was an open area with no toilet and other facilities to cook our food and temporary shed for our rest during the day. We walked for nearly three kilometers every day to fetch water from a stream for drinking and other necessities. The scorching heat made our work more difficult as we worked under the open sky. We virtually ate sand that flew inside our tiffin boxes. We were too poor to afford an umbrella to protect us from sultry heat and heavy rains. We planted around 35 varieties of trees and used to receive a paltry sum of Rs 56 ($ 0.79) as daily wages in exchange of working for 8-9 hours a day that reached to Rs 111($1.57) in 2010.”

Alfred points  to another major problem faced by them during the plantation: “We also created our own nursery for plantation. But the villagers became envious of us. They thought that we were trying to grab the land by growing the forest while others thought that it was a ploy to gobble the funds. Some of them conspired to set the forest on fire. We came to know about it and started patrolling during night hours. We walked for 3 kilometers and brought water from the stream and kept it ready in case of any eventuality. The fire indeed broke out thrice during the night hours and we had to rush with water gallons on our back to bring it under the control. Unfortunately, some of the saplings were lost and were planted again.”

Increase in Biodiversity

Their hard work finally paid off. The more than 1.4 million saplings they’ve planted since 2005 have now turned into a dense green forest inhabited by snakes, deer, wild boars, and birds. The area is also frequented by elephants from the neighboring state of Arunachal Pradesh and neighboring country Bhutan. The group has also built a treehouse for tourists.

“Earlier, we hardly used to see elephants in this region but now jumbos crossover from the Arunachal Pradesh and Bhutan borders located at a distance of a few kilometers and roam in this part of the forest that was once a barren sandy land,” said Anshu Daimari, 59, a local.

In 2016, the men formed Gethsemane Joint Forest Management Committee (JFMC) as a governing body bringing six village sub-committees under its umbrella. The JFMC won a ‘Lifetime Achievement Award’ from Kaziranga Wildlife Society in 2016 and restoration award from Balipara Foundation in 2017.

The members are now mostly involved in farming and other jobs, but they still have strong emotional connections with the forest. “The government doesn’t pay us anymore but the forest is our child whom we have given birth. We cannot leave it alone. At least two members of the JFMC regularly come here to inspect it. Local villagers immediately inform us if there is any attempt of timber theft,” according to Prinson.

The members unanimously urge the state government to promote tourism. “We have spent our lives in growing the forest but have got nothing in return. We do not have the same energy left and do odd jobs for survival. We urge the government to promote tourism so that the money earned can be utilized for its maintenance. Our work can never be compensated in terms of materialistic awards. The only remuneration is its preservation when we are gone,” Bilup said as tears welled up in his eyes.

The forest department says it has heard the men’s pleas and is working to boost tourism in the region. “We understand that tourism is the only way to create livelihood for them,” said MK Sarma, Divisional Forest Officer, Dhansiri forest division. “We have already built a guest house and [we are] trying to come up with more such accommodations for tourists.”

Similar initiative kicks off in Dhansiri

Taking cues from the 35 men’s commendable efforts to restore the forest, a group of around 62 members stepped in from ten villages and started a similar plantation drive in another part of the reserve forest. Subsequently, seven village sub-committees have been formed under Dhansiri JFMC.

The afforestation project was officially launched in January 2019 through a partnership between Balipara Foundation and the Dhansiri JFMC. “The project is tasked to plant [350,000] trees over 250 hectares of land over the next two years,” said Proloy Daimari, President of Dhanseri JFMC. “We have already planted [180,000] saplings of 20 varieties this year. The aim is not only to save the environment but also to turn it into a revenue model by promoting eco-tourism, agriculture, and poultry. We want to ensure that the members can earn their livelihood from it instead of venturing outside.”

“We are funding around 74 lakh for the two-year project that would end by December 2020. The aim is not only to conserve the environment but also to offer livelihoods for the villagers so that they take an active part in conserving the environment. We are also promoting eco-tourism and cottage industry for the villagers under Udalguri Landscape Mission (ULM),” said Robin Eastment, an operations manager for Balipara foundation who has been working to create livelihood opportunities for forest fringe communities. The ULM aims to identify drivers for conservation and development and invest in projects that help balance ecological and social outcomes.

From Mongabay

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: Maybe the White House Meant "Take Her Out" and "Your Head Will Be on a Pike" in an Innocent Way? Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=53095"><span class="small">Jeremey Stahl, Slate</span></a>   
Sunday, 26 January 2020 12:06

Stahl writes: "Late on Thursday, and again on Friday afternoon, Rep. Adam Schiff made a powerful argument that President Donald Trump must be convicted of abuse of power and removed from office, before he can use his office to damage the country's democratic institutions again, perhaps beyond repair."

Marie Yovanovitch. (photo: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)
Marie Yovanovitch. (photo: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)


Maybe the White House Meant "Take Her Out" and "Your Head Will Be on a Pike" in an Innocent Way?

By Jeremey Stahl, Slate

26 January 20

 

ate on Thursday, and again on Friday afternoon, Rep. Adam Schiff made a powerful argument that President Donald Trump must be convicted of abuse of power and removed from office, before he can use his office to damage the country’s democratic institutions again, perhaps beyond repair. This was, technically, part of the House impeachment managers’ opening remarks, but under the topsy-turvy procedural rules set for Trump’s trial by the Republican Senate majority, it may stand as Schiff’s best chance at making a closing argument as well.

Republican senators have so far appeared unmoved by the case the impeachment managers are making for holding a full trial of the president, with new documents and witnesses, let alone by the case for his conviction. On Friday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham—who a day earlier had praised Schiff’s presentation—called the case against Trump presented by the House managers on Thursday “mind numbing.” Sen. John Barrasso echoed those remarks, saying: “It seems to me their case is weaker today than it was yesterday. There’s so little brought out kind of every hour and a half they bring out the same thing.”

Axios on Friday, meanwhile, reported that Senate Republicans were pushing the message that the trial had been tainted by Rep. Jerry Nadler’s remarks that Senators who blocked witnesses and evidence would “be complicit in the president’s cover-up.” That call for independence had “backfired on Democrats,” Axios’ sources said; self-styled Republican moderates, whose votes would be essential to calling new witnesses, called it “stunning” or “offensive.”

Similarly, Axios reported that Senate Republicans were taking offense at Schiff’s argument that Trump’s repeated attempts to cheat would not stop, and that such cheating threatened to place the legitimacy of the 2020 general election outcome in doubt. As the majority weighed how seriously they have to take the trial, it was apparently insulting to try to remind them of the stakes.

The thrust of all the complaining was that the House managers, by hurting the Republicans’ feelings, were forfeiting their claim to be able to call witnesses, let alone to win a conviction. It gave Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s caucus something to talk about other than the hours and hours of factual documentation that Trump is a reckless criminal who attempted to extort a foreign power to help him cheat in the next election, and who can only be expected to increase his abuses once the threat of impeachment no longer looms over his head.

Meanwhile, even as the Republicans were expressing their dismay at being bullied by the impeachment managers, CBS News reported late Thursday that a “Trump confidant” had issued a warning to wavering Republican Senators: “Vote against the president, and your head will be on a pike.” Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins, who had denounced Nadler for suggesting they could be complicit in the president’s coverup, have so far had nothing to say about the president’s camp publicly threatening them if they don’t loyally go along with Trump.

Then, on Friday, ABC News reported it had reviewed a recording of an April 2018 dinner at the Trump International Hotel attended by Rudy Giuliani’s now-indicted associates Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman, in which the president could be heard saying of Marie Yovanovitch, the American ambassador to Ukraine, “Get rid of her! Get her out tomorrow. I don’t care. Get her out tomorrow. Take her out. OK? Do it.”

Parnas had previous told interviewers that at that dinner he had beseeched Trump to get rid of Yovanovitch—who he saw as an obstacle to using Ukrainian authorities to advance Trump’s private political goals—and the president had offered to do so. The new recording seems to corroborate that account. Parnas and Fruman have been indicted by the Southern District of New York for campaign finance crimes related to their pressure campaign to remove Yovanovitch, who was ultimately “taken out” one year later and who text messages show may have been stalked by goons working on behalf of Parnas (Ukraine has said it is investigating the evidence).

President Trump has said he doesn’t know Parnas and that “I don’t believe I’ve ever spoken to him.” The recording reportedly features Parnas telling the president “We gotta get rid of the ambassador” and “She’s basically walking around telling everybody ‘Wait, he’s gonna get impeached, just wait.’” Such a conversation would obviously contradict Trump’s claim that they had never spoken.

How did Republicans react to this news? Vice President Mike Pence said any such recording “will only confirm what people already know: is that the president had concerns, and in his authority the president made a decision.” Graham, meanwhile, responded that “the president can fire any ambassador they want.”

Faced with new proof, past and present, of the president issuing mobster-like threats, the Senate majority remains unmoved. Why bother getting any documents or testimony from Parnas, or from anyone else, if the conclusion will still be the same? Whatever the president may do, or may have already done, the majority will define it as his legitimate use of his powers. To support the charge of abuse of office, the impeachment managers have repeatedly played the video clip of Trump declaring that under Article 2 of the Constitution, he is allowed to do whatever he wants. Where they see the crime, the Republicans see the excuse for it.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Ohio's Illegal Voter Purge Is a Direct Attack on the Democratic Voters Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=53093"><span class="small">Greg Palast, Greg Palast's Facebook Page</span></a>   
Sunday, 26 January 2020 09:41

Palast writes: "USA Today reports on #Ohio's 2019 voter purges that removed more than 460,000 registrations."

Investigative reporter Greg Palast. (photo: Greg Palast's Website)
Investigative reporter Greg Palast. (photo: Greg Palast's Website)


Ohio's Illegal Voter Purge Is a Direct Attack on the Democratic Voters

By Greg Palast, Greg Palast's Facebook Page

26 January 20

 

SA Today reports on #Ohio's 2019 voter purges that removed more than 460,000 registrations, noting that:

1. The young were disproportionately purged: Nearly 1 out of 3 purged voters was age 25 to 34.

2. Where a party preference could be determined based on the last partisan primary in which the voter cast a ballot, Democrats outnumbered Republicans almost 2 to 1.

Our experts have been screaming that the big purge attacks young voters — i.e. Democrats. The excuse is that they’ve moved out of Ohio. They haven’t. They are students and renters who moved to a new dorm or down the street.

And as usual with the mainstream media, USA Today have it dead wrong: Federal law prohibits the removal inactive voters from voter rolls. They hunt for “errors“ in the purge list, when the entire freaking operation is stone cold illegal.

In my film, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy, I showed you how they stole Ohio in 2016. If you haven’t seen it yet, shame on you. Because they’re going to steal it again.

Watch it for FREE on Amazon Prime, Or get a signed DVD + FREE download with a donation to support our work
e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 Next > End >>

Page 612 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN