RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
FOCUS: Trump's Troubling Clemencies for His White-Collar Criminal Friends Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=51459"><span class="small">Jeffrey Toobin, The New Yorker</span></a>   
Thursday, 20 February 2020 12:12

Toobin writes: "Authoritarianism is usually associated with a punitive spirit - a leader who prosecutes and incarcerates his enemies. But there is another side to this leadership style."

The former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich, whose fourteen-year prison sentence the president commuted on Tuesday, was a contestant on 'Celebrity Apprentice.' (photo: Jeff Haynes/Reuters)
The former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich, whose fourteen-year prison sentence the president commuted on Tuesday, was a contestant on 'Celebrity Apprentice.' (photo: Jeff Haynes/Reuters)


Trump's Troubling Clemencies for His White-Collar Criminal Friends

By Jeffrey Toobin, The New Yorker

20 February 20

 

uthoritarianism is usually associated with a punitive spirit—a leader who prosecutes and incarcerates his enemies. But there is another side to this leadership style. Authoritarians also dispense largesse, but they do it by their own whims, rather than pursuant to any system or legal rule. The point of authoritarianism is to concentrate power in the ruler, so the world knows that all actions, good and bad, harsh and generous, come from a single source. That’s the real lesson—a story of creeping authoritarianism—of today’s commutations and pardons by President Trump.

Trump commuted the sentence of Rod Blagojevich, the former governor of Illinois, who was eight years into a sentence of fourteen years, for various forms of corruption in office. The President pardoned several other white-collar criminals: Michael Milken, the junk-bond king, who pleaded guilty, in 1990, to securities violations; Bernard Kerik, the former New York City police commissioner, who, in 2009, pleaded guilty to charges of tax fraud and lying to the government; and Edward J. DeBartolo, Jr., a former owner of the San Francisco 49ers, who, in 1998, pleaded guilty to concealing an extortion attempt.(Milken and Kerik served time in prison; DeBartolo was fined a million dollars and suspended for a year by the N.F.L.)

The common link among this group is that all have some personal connection to the President. Blagojevich was a contestant on “Celebrity Apprentice,” and he was prosecuted by Patrick Fitzgerald, a close friend of and lawyer for James Comey, the former F.B.I. director who is a Trump enemy. Explaining his action today, Trump said of the case against Blagojevich, “It was a prosecution by the same people—Comey, Fitzpatrick—the same group.” Milken’s annual financial conferences are a favorite meeting place for, among others, Trump’s moneyed friends. (Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner spoke at last year’s gathering.) Milken is also an active philanthropist, as Trump observed: “We have Mike Milken, who’s gone around and done an incredible job for the world, with all of his research on cancer, and he’s done this and he suffered greatly. He paid a big price, paid a very tough price.” Trump’s explanation for the Kerik pardon is probably the most revealing. The President said that Kerik is “a man who had many recommendations from a lot of good people. You know, oftentimes—pretty much all the time—I really rely on the recommendations of people that know them.” Kerik was appointed police commissioner by Rudolph Giuliani, who was then the mayor of New York and is now Trump’s personal lawyer. It’s safe to assume that Giuliani played a role in Trump’s decision to pardon him. And DeBartolo’s cause was championed by a large group of former professional football players, whose favor Trump has often sought.

In short, then, the pardons were entirely personal in origin, and so the granting of them was exclusively an exercise of Trump’s own power. That was their point. A benevolent leader dispensed favors. The world will not change much because of these actions; of the four, only Blagojevich was still incarcerated. Some of the others may receive a few minor benefits, such as a restored right to purchase guns legally. The only cost is the further degradation of the government, moving our system closer to a cult of personality. In this era of mass incarceration, many people deserve pardons and commutations, but this is not the way to go about it. All Trump has done is to prove that he can reward his friends and his friends’ friends. The chilling corollary is that he knows he can punish his enemies, too.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Bloomberg Spent Hundreds of Millions to Get His Ass Kicked Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=53391"><span class="small">Scott Bixby and Hunter Woodall, The Washington Post</span></a>   
Thursday, 20 February 2020 09:47

Excerpt: "In a city that runs on cash, Mike Bloomberg learned that all the money in the world couldn't save him from an unrelenting pummeling from the 2020 field."

Mike Bloomberg at the Democratic debate in Las Vegas, Nevada, on February 19, 2020. (photo: Mario Tama/Getty)
Mike Bloomberg at the Democratic debate in Las Vegas, Nevada, on February 19, 2020. (photo: Mario Tama/Getty)


ALSO SEE: At Fiery Democratic Debate, a Sour Welcome for Bloomberg,
Sanders and Warren Have Strong Performance

Bloomberg Spent Hundreds of Millions to Get His Ass Kicked

By Scott Bixby and Hunter Woodall, The Washington Post

20 February 20


It became clear early on that former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg was not welcome on the debate stage or anywhere else in the Democratic primary by the 2020 field.

n a city that runs on cash, Mike Bloomberg learned that all the money in the world couldn’t save him from an unrelenting pummeling from the 2020 field. 

In the grand tradition of a Vegas fight night, Wednesday’s face-off at the Paris Hotel was the most contentious Democratic debate of the 2020 nomination cycle. The six candidates onstage drew sharp-edged contrasts on matters of both policy and personality, with a near-singular focus on newcomer Bloomberg—and with Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who has defined her candidacy around sticking it to the wealthy and well-connected typified by the New York billionaire, leading the charge.

“I’d like to talk about who we’re running against: a billionaire who calls women fat broads and horse-faced lesbians,” Warren said immediately out of the gate, in an exchange that set the tone for the following two hours. “No, I’m not talking about Donald Trump—I’m talking about Michael Bloomberg.”

“Look, I’ll support whoever the Democratic nominee is,” Warren added later.” But understand this: Democrats take a huge risk if we just substitute one arrogant billionaire for another.” 

Even though the night started with a round of attacks focused squarely on Bloomberg’s record as mayor of New York, the chippiness quickly spilled over to former South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg, who grouped Bloomberg and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders together as each too polarizing to win a general election. 

Buttigieg warned that Democrats could awake the day after Super Tuesday with Sanders and Bloomberg as the only candidates left standing, who are “the two most polarizing figures on this stage.” 

“We shouldn’t have to choose between one candidate who wants to burn this party down and another candidate who wants to buy this party out,” Buttigieg said. 

Bloomberg, the billionaire owner of the eponymous financial information and news conglomerate and former mayor-for-life of New York City, became the unofficial target of every other candidate onstage the moment that he qualified for the debate—his first since the Democratic National Committee changed eligibility rules to allow self-funded candidates to participate.

The decision outraged candidates across the ideological spectrum, with Warren, who has made disentangling the American political system from the wealthy and influential the bedrock of her candidacy, using Bloomberg’s entrance as an opportunity to jumpstart her struggling campaign. 

Warren was largely an afterthought during the previous debate in New Hampshire and after finishing a distant fourth in the primary she appeared to have lost all momentum.

That changed Wednesday night, as she clashed with Bloomberg over his record with women and nondisclosure agreements, a topic squarely in her wheelhouse of transparency and gender issues. 

Bloomberg seemed visibly uncomfortable with Warren’s continued pressing for more information on specific aspects of his treatment of women. At one juncture, she asked the billionaire Democrat how many women were subjected to nondisclosure agreements under his leadership. 

“This is not just a question of the mayor’s character,” Warren said. “This is also a question about electability. We are not going to beat Donald Trump with a man who has who knows how many nondisclosure agreements and the drip drip drip of stories of women saying they have been harassed and discriminated against. That’s not what we do as Democrats.” 

(Asked after the debate if he felt that Bloomberg—who has a long history of allegedly making inappropriate and offensive comments about women—had adequately prepared for the assault, campaign adviser Howard Wolfson said that while “nobody is perfect,” the former mayor was proud of creating “an inclusive workplace that values everyone.”)

As Bloomberg took hit after hit over his professional conduct, mayoral record, and refusal to release women from nondisclosure agreements, Sanders—who emerged victorious in last week’s New Hampshire primary and appears poised to win Nevada’s upcoming caucuses—emerged from the debate practically unscathed. 

“It was a bit of a battle royale,” Wolfson told reporters in the spin room after the debate, although he insisted that Bloomberg had drawn a “clear contrast” between himself and Sanders and added that the contest for the Democratic nomination was a race between the two.

“This is going to be a two-person race,” Wolfson said. “Bernie Sanders in first, Mike Bloomberg in second.”

Short of a tense exchange earlier in the evening with Buttigieg over the perceived extremism of some of his online supporters, the Vermont senator was almost never on the receiving end of the traditional frontrunner treatment.

Bloomberg’s entrance also spelled trouble for other moderate options on stage. A source close to former Vice President Joe Biden told The Daily Beast ahead of Wednesday night’s event that he was “going to be feistier” than in previous debates, with a particular focus on the former New York City mayor, a strategy that he—like nearly every other person onstage—had already previewed in the days leading up to Las Vegas.

But Biden failed to be a chief antagonist for Bloomberg as his campaign struggles to recover after a pair of humiliating lower-tier finishes in the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary largely knocked the wind out of his poll numbers. Biden tried again Wednesday night to focus on the electability argument despite his lack of success in Iowa and New Hampshire, but his performance focused on telling the crowd he was electable rather than showing it.  

While the New Hampshire debate may have vaulted Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar to a surprise third place finish in the state, Bloomberg’s debate stage entrance made Klobuchar’s preferred centrist lane more crowded than it had been in months. 

The added competition from the former mayor relegated Klobuchar to emphasizing again her credentials as a proven lawmaker as she attacked Bloomberg for “hiding behind his TV ads.”  She further had to play clean-up over an earlier failure to name the president of Mexico, giving Warren the chance to show support for Klobuchar in one of the debate’s kinder moments. 

Tensions also continued to escalate between Buttigieg and Klobuchar; the Midwestern rivals have little time left to stand out before the crucial Super Tuesday contests.

Before he weathered many of the Democratic field’s constant attacks Wednesday night, Bloomberg tried to win over Democratic voters on one of the issues they care about most: Who can beat President Trump? 

Nominating Sanders, Bloomberg said, means another four years of Trump. 

“I’m a New Yorker,” Bloomberg said. “I know how to take on an arrogant con man like Donald Trump that comes from New York.”  

In a moment that may foreshadow tensions yet to come, the candidates were asked toward the end whether the person with the most delegates should be the nominee even if they come into the convention short of a majority. 

“No,” Biden said. “Let the process work its way out.” 

And even after getting shredded by his 2020 rivals, Bloomberg couldn’t pass on making one last dig about his financial power in the presidential race where he has already spent hundreds of millions. 

“You can join me at mikebloomberg.com too if you want,” the former mayor said shortly before the debate ended. “But I’m not asking for any money.”  

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Trump's Pardons of Rod Blagojevich and Others Are Meant to Convince America Corruption Is OK Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=53390"><span class="small">Barbara McQuade, NBC News</span></a>   
Thursday, 20 February 2020 09:47

McQuade writes: "If actions speak louder than words, then President Donald Trump's granting of pardons Tuesday was deafening."

Former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich arrives at O'Hare International Airport following his release from prison on February 19, 2020. (photo: Nuccio DiNuzzo/Getty)
Former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich arrives at O'Hare International Airport following his release from prison on February 19, 2020. (photo: Nuccio DiNuzzo/Getty)


Trump's Pardons of Rod Blagojevich and Others Are Meant to Convince America Corruption Is OK

By Barbara McQuade, NBC News

20 February 20


By inuring the public to the harm of fraud and corruption, the president can convince his base of supporters that these are not serious crimes.

f actions speak louder than words, then President Donald Trump's granting of pardons Tuesday was deafening.

The list of 11 lucky Americans granted clemency read like a who's who of the rich and the famous — former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, former San Francisco 49ers owner Eddie DeBartolo Jr., Wall Street financier Michael Milken and former New York City police Commissioner Bernard Kerik among them. Many of the offenders who received pardons or commutations of their sentences were convicted of crimes relating to fraud and corruption.

The message Trump is sending seems loud and clear: Fraud and corruption are not serious crimes. And as such, these types of white-collar crimes can be ignored. As a former federal prosecutor, I could not disagree more. In fact, I believe fraud and corruption are among the most serious of crimes, because they are motivated by greed and erode our faith in government.

White-collar crimes are, by definition, usually committed by offenders in positions to succeed financially. They simply want more. Take Blagojevich, for example. Having ascended to governor, he controlled the levers of power in Illinois. Not satisfied with his existing authority, he sought to harness his power to extract even more power and money from others.

Among other things, Blagojevich tried to sell the Senate seat vacated when Barack Obama became president. When public officials abuse power in this way, it deprives the public of the honest services they deserve, damages trust in the government, deters people with integrity from seeking public office themselves and discourages honest business transactions with public officials. People become cynical and disengaged in democracy, which leaves governing to the autocrats. In this way, fraud and corruption have a corrosive effect on society.

No doubt, taking away someone's liberty is a harsh penalty in a society that treasures freedom. For this reason, judges are required to fashion sentences that are sufficient but no greater than necessary. Among the reasons judges impose prison sentences are deterrence and respect for the rule of law. To induce people to comply with the law, they need to know that violations bring consequences.

Think about the way many drivers behave in traffic. Some people will comply with the speed limit at all times because they respect the rules of the road and the safety goals they seek to promote. Others will exceed the speed limit on the freeway until they see a police car on the side of the road, and then they will suddenly hit their brakes. They slow down not because they respect the rules, but because they don't want to get caught.

Politicians and business executives behave in similar patterns. Most use their political and financial power in accordance with the law simply because it is the right thing to do. But we know that without a figurative police officer on the side of the road, some will abuse their power. Criminal punishment is necessary to deter this kind of conduct and promote respect for the rule of law.

But what if those deterrence measures are provided only sparingly? And what if the more well connected you were, the more likely you would be to get away with breaking the law? Suddenly, we have a very clear set of incentives to ignore the rule of law.

Predators of all types — from criminals who engage in fraud to those who commit sexual exploitation — often groom their victims for action they want to take in the future. They use an incremental approach to normalize inappropriate behavior. When the conduct advances only bit by bit, no individual step causes the victim to stop it. At some point, the transformation becomes complete, the behavior has lost its taboo, and the defendant can engage in once-unthinkable misconduct unchecked.

Trump may be using his pardon power in the same way. By inuring the public to the harm of fraud and corruption, the president can convince his base of supporters that these are not serious crimes. He has called the 14-year sentence for Blagojevich "ridiculous," stating that his conviction is based on "a phone call where nothing happened." Sound familiar?

And yet, in that phone call, Blagojevich literally discussed selling Obama's Senate seat. Blagojevich saw the appointment not as a duty of office but as a moneymaking opportunity. And contrary to Trump's representation that Blagojevich's conviction was based on a single phone call, he was convicted on 18 counts, including offenses based on his efforts to pressure a children's hospital and developers of a racetrack to make campaign contributions. As the sentencing judge explained, "The harm is the erosion of public trust in government."

The timing and the number of the pardons granted Tuesday suggest that something bigger than just these 11 defendants is afoot. Trump's longtime adviser Roger Stone is scheduled to be sentenced Thursday. Stone will likely be directed to report to a prison to begin serving a sentence in about three months. And so, it may be that Trump is laying the groundwork to pardon Stone, as well.

Trump is using pardons to undermine public faith in the government and the criminal justice system. If, at some point, he decides to pardon Stone and other allies, such as former campaign chairman Paul Manafort or former national security adviser Michael Flynn, the outrage will have been defused. Trump hopes that the reaction will be a collective shrug. And then what once-unthinkable behavior comes next? Does his conduct leave us with one system of justice for billionaires, family members and allies and another for the rest of us who are not so well connected?

Trump's pardons are just one more act in a pattern of outrageous conduct that should set off alarm bells on a regular basis. He is counting on the public to stop listening.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Endangered Species Are Casualties of Trump's Border Wall Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=53388"><span class="small">Garet Bleir, Sierra Club</span></a>   
Thursday, 20 February 2020 09:47

Bleir writes: "As new border wall construction rips through some of the most biologically diverse desert lands in North America, it is putting nearly 100 endangered species at increased risk."

Wolf mother with pups. (photo: Wolf Conservation Center)
Wolf mother with pups. (photo: Wolf Conservation Center)


Endangered Species Are Casualties of Trump's Border Wall

By Garet Bleir, Sierra Club

20 February 20


The habitats for jaguars, ocelots, and wolves are being cut in half

s new border wall construction rips through some of the most biologically diverse desert lands in North America, it is putting nearly 100 endangered species at increased risk. “I think many people still don't realize that the border wall—in addition to being a despicable racist symbol of Trump's hateful border policies—also will wipe some species off the face of the planet and have irreversible environmental impacts, changing these places forever,” says Laiken Jordahl, borderlands campaigner for the Center for Biological Diversity. Jordahl has traveled the extent of the US-Mexico borderlands advocating against border wall construction and routinely posts updates on social media about the topic. 

Before the Trump administration came to power in 2017, there were already approximately 650 miles of barriers in place along the roughly 2,000-mile-long US-Mexico border. While some Democratic party leaders have sought to downplay the extent of border wallwal construction—apparently in an attempt to snatch away from Trump one of his main campaign pledges—the ongoing construction does present a new threat to desert ecosystems, Jordahl says. “DHS is replacing tiny vehicle barriers—which wildlife and water could pass through with total ease—with a massive solid wall that will stop every single species of wildlife larger than a pocket mouse in its tracks.”

The Trump administration has already put in place 119 miles of new border fortifications and has plans for a total of 576 miles of wall —450 of which it expects to have completed by the end of this year —using over $11 billion in taxpayer money. The administration has now notified Congress it is diverting another $3.8 billion dollars from the Pentagon budget in order to wall off hundreds of more miles—a move that critics say is unconstitutional. (The Sierra Club is the lead plaintiff in a suit challenging the constitutionality of the border wall funding.)

To those unfamiliar with the borderlands of the Southwest, mention of the region may conjure images of a vast desert wasteland. In reality, the US-Mexico borderlands are some of the most biodiverse wildlands in North America.

Across most of the United States, such landscapes and the endangered and threatened species living within them would be protected under federal and state regulations. But using the powers available to it under a post-9/11 security law called the Real ID Act, the Trump administration has waived dozens of critical environmental safeguards along the border, including the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, and the National Environmental Policy Act. That has left public interest watchdog groups with few legal opportunities to challenge the administration’s activities.

Here is a short list of some of the species that are being harmed or whose habitats are being fragmented as the Trump administration bulldozes the desert.

Saguaro Cactus:

Jordahl has witnessed destruction firsthand in Organ Pipe National Monument, parts of which are being razed to build a 30-foot-high wall in spite of the area’s status as federally designated wilderness. The Border Patrol and its contractors have bulldozed some 30 miles along the southern end of the park, and in the process have killed hundreds, if not thousands, of saguaro cacti, a signature plant of the Sonoran Desert. “Saguaros are being destroyed, chopped up like firewood, and discarded into trash heaps—all on sacred lands of the Tohono O'odham who actively use the area for ceremonial purposes,” Jordahl says.  One site in the National Monument —Monument Hill, a sacred burial site of the Tohono O’odam people— is being blown up to make way for the border wall.

Under Arizona law, if someone is found guilty of damaging or cutting down a saguaro, they could face felony charges and up to a 25-year prison sentence. Now, the Trump Administration is literally bulldozing them in a national monument. “We’re watching the destruction of a national treasure,” Jordahl says. “It's heartbreaking.”

Mexican Gray Wolf

A subspecies of the gray wolf, the Mexican gray wolf is the southernmost wolf in North America, the smallest of its species (ranging from 50 to 80 pounds), and also among the most endangered. Historically, the predator roamed throughout the borderlands of southwestern US and into northern Mexico. Today, the core of the US population straddles the the border between New Mexico and Arizona, with many finding home in the Gila Wilderness of New Mexico.

In the late 1970s, under a binational effort by the US and Mexico to save the species, seven Mexican gray wolves were captured and bred in captivity. Today, all living Mexican gray wolves are descended from those seven—putting the species at risk of a genetic bottleneck. The population of wild Mexican gray wolves in the United States currently totals 131, while the population in Mexico is around 20 to 30, says Maggie Howell of the Wolf Conservation Center. While the populations of wild wolves may be the largest it has ever been since its reintroduction in the late 1990s, it’s also significantly inbred.

As border wall construction pushes forward, wolf populations are at risk of being fragmented, thus reducing the chances that the subspecies may recover a healthy genetic diversity. “And the larger [the population] gets, the harder it will be to perform a genetic rescue to the wild population—which is basically all brothers and sisters now,” she adds.

Biologists say it is imperative for the wolves’ survival that the subpopulations in the United States and Mexico expand and are able to cross the US-Mexico border to breed with each other. In 2016, conservationists’ dreams of uniting these two populations seemed imminent when a wolf from the Mexico subpopulation ventured across the border into the United States, where he remained for a few days before returning to Mexico. Just a year later, in 2017, a female wolf crossed the border as well. “What these wolves did—and these are just the wolves we know about —is proved there is hope to connect these two subpopulations,” Howell says.

Then came the new border wall construction. “Now any wolves migrating north from Mexico or south from the US will find an impenetrable wall in their path,” Jordahl says. “They’ve already completed a huge amount of border wall in New Mexico and we’re seeing it cut off all possible migratory path for the wolf there, save a few high elevation corridors in the boot heel.”

“The fact that something everybody in the recovery of Mexican gray wolves is working towards, is now literally being blocked off…I’m feeling the devastation to this subspecies,” Howell says. “We are blocking off a chance for these animals to one day be a self-sustaining, healthy, recovered population.”

Jaguar

Elsewhere along the border roams the jaguar, the spotted big cat that is the third largest cat in the world and the largest one native to North America. Jaguars are typically found all the way from the Brazilian Amazon through to their northernmost reaches of the Sky Islands of Arizona and New Mexico, where conservationists are working to restore the jaguar to their traditional territory. Listed as endangered and protected in both the United States and Mexico, one of the main jaguar recovery goals is to allow the species to roam between the two countries. At least seven jaguars have been documented in Arizona within the past 20 years – three of them in just the past several years. But, just as with the Mexican gray wolf, border wall construction threatens to stall the species recovery.

Arizona canyons, riparian corridors, and rivers crossing the border are used by jaguars, says Sergio Avila, a big cat wildlife biologist who now works for the Sierra Club. It was in Sky Islands outside of Tucson, Arizona where El Jefe —the most publicized jaguar in the United States —was frequently photographed. There have been other sightings of jaguars just north of the border in the Huachuca Mountains and Dos Cabezas Mountains; and Avila himself has photographed jaguars about 35 miles southeast of Nogales on the southern side of the border.

“All these little dots on the map, basically let you see that, One: jaguars are using the Sky Islands,” Avila says. “Two: they're moving back and forth from the border. And Three: any construction and any activities of law enforcement along that region of the border would definitely impact the movements of jaguars.”

Avila is quick to note that border militarization’s impacts on jaguar and other wildlife go beyond the physical wall. Birds and animals are also impacted by the associated truck traffic, cranes, and machines used to build that wall—as well as the helicopters, roads, patrols, checkpoints, lights, and generators used in militarizing the southern border. “Without ever getting to see the border wall, the jaguars would not use those areas anymore because of all the movement before, during, and after construction,” Avila says. “This all amounts to destruction of public lands and is happening in places that jaguars could use or have used.”

Ocelot:

The Tamaulipan thornscrub of the Rio Grande Valley is the native habitat of the ocelot —cinnamon-colored, spotted cat that weighs around 30 pounds and is sometimes referred to as the “dwarf leopard.” Biologists estimate that there are a scant 50 ocelots left in the United States. Their recovery is complicated by the fact that less than one percent of the species’ native habitat remains intact within South Texas—and border wall construction threatens to destroy even more. As border wall construction continues through the Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge—a constellation of nearly 150 wildlife refuge tracts connecting pockets of wildlife in the valley—the opportunities for the Ocelot in Texas to connect and breed with the populations in Mexico are becoming slimmer.

 “This is a death sentence because they have nowhere to go,” Avila says. “They have no connections, no genetic inter-breeding, and will be impacted by habitat destruction.”

In addition to Texas, five ocelot have now been spotted in Arizona since 2009. Researchers believe they came from a population located just south of the border in the Mexican state of Sonora. That is where, in the early 2000s, Avila and other research were granted permission by a private ranch to set up cameras to photograph jaguar— which they did successfully several years later. But the cameras also captured footage of another protected species: the ocelot. This “made the rancher’s heart melt,” Avila recalls. “It made him commit directly to conservation. He expressed his love for this species and in that moment he saw the photograph, he said ‘I'm going to remove all the cattle I have in that canyon, because from now on this canyon will be the ‘Canyon of the Ocelot.’” The ranch was eventually designated as a protected national area in Mexico.

Avila’s team identified 18 different ocelots over eight years. Most importantly, the team documented photos of kittens, proving that there were both males and females in the area— the northernmost known wild breeding population of ocelot. This research led to a critical addition to the recovery plan for ocelots, which originally did not consider the Arizona-Sonoran subpopulation of Ocelot.

Last year, however, the Department of Homeland Security announced plans for a 26-mile stretch of border wall just north of this ocelot population. While those plans were put on hold due to insufficient funds, Trump’s recent victory in securing $7 billion in funds for border wall construction may put those plans back into action.

As with other species, the road construction, Border Patrol traffic, lighting, noise, and air pollution that comes with border militarization also makes life more difficult for ocelots.  “All of these things combined create impacts far beyond the physical footprint of the wall,” says ocelot biologist Jessica Moreno. “Ocelots are very sensitive to those kinds of disturbances, so they would not even try to cross. So a wall hampers all of our investments in protecting land on both sides for the recovery of the Ocelot in Arizona.”

Peninsular Bighorn Sheep:

Inhabiting dry and rocky desert slopes, canyons and washes ranging from the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa mountains of California all the way south to Baja California, Mexico, the endangered Peninsular bighorn sheep finds itself under threat from a combination of border wall construction and other development in its core habitat. This development threatens to further fragment habitat connectivity and isolate the remnants of the species from each other. The San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation and Research is conducting research exploring cross-border connectivity between Peninsular bighorn sheep populations, and its 2012 population survey showed a much larger population of bighorns just south of the border than had been expected.

During the past two centuries, this subspecies of bighorn sheep has suffered from habitat loss, disease, and overhunting. By the 1990s, its population dipped to as low as 276 animals, and it was placed on the endangered species list in 1998. While the population has since rebounded in the United States and is recovering in Mexico, careful management of the species is needed to continue the recovery. “We’re at a stage where there are around 800 Peninsular bighorn [in the US] and that's been a slow process getting back,” says Jim DeForge, executive director of the Bighorn Institute. “That number has been going up and down.”

Connectivity across landscapes is vital for the Peninsular bighorn sheep to flourish, according to a cross-border collaborative study between the San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation and Research and the Universidad Autónoma de Baja California. The study determined the species has retained a “substantial genetic variation,” but that border wall construction or further development along the border “could have severe consequences” on the species’ demographics and genetic diversity as a whole and increase the extinction risk of the subpopulation spanning the border.

Aquatic Species:

Not only is the border wall construction bulldozing protected flora, it also threatens desert aquifers like the one feeding Organ Pipe National Monument’s Quitobaquito Springs. Some environmental researchers and activists say the DHS’s massive ground water withdrawals for concrete mixing is reckless and threatens this unique oasis.

Quitobaquito Springs is the only habitat in the world of the Quitobaquito pumpfish and one of just two habitats of the Sonoyta mud turtle. Border wall contractors are extracting water from the aquifer that feeds the springs; and while no one knows exactly how much, some estimates project that as much as 50 million gallons of groundwater may be required for border wall construction on the Arizona border.

Several hundred miles east of Organ Pipe, similar rare aquatic resources at the San Bernardino National Wildlife Refuge are also in peril. There, DHS is drawing water from aquifers that are the sources of aquatic habitats called ciénegas—a type of desert wetland. The San Bernardino ciénegas are home to four endangered species of Yaqui fish: the topminnow, catfish, slider, and chub, which live nowhere else in the United States. “We could see these habitats—the entire habitats for all of the Yaqui fish—wiped off the face of the map in the next year or number of months,” Jordahl from the Center for Biological Diversity says. “It's so heartbreaking to see them sucking up this groundwater—a non-renewable resource in the desert…much of which dates back to the Ice Age…and which would never be allowed if it wasn’t for the waiver of the Endangered Species Act. Giant tanker trucks fill up at the wells all day long, taking out 112,000 gallons of water each shift.”

“They don't have to suck the entire aquifer dry to damage the springs,”Jordahl adds. Just by dropping the water table by a foot or two, water flow to the springs may stop or slow, in the process destroying the ciénegas. This would mean death for not only the endangered aquatic species, but would also jeopardize all species that depend on the water there, including the endangered Chiricahua leopard frog, endangered northern Mexican garter snake, protected desert tortoises, as well as other birds and mammals that drink from these pools.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
An Open Letter to Donald J. Trump Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=53380"><span class="small">Neil Young, Neil Young Archives</span></a>   
Wednesday, 19 February 2020 14:23

Young writes: "You are a disgrace to my country. Bragging about the US economy does not disguise the fact that the numbers today are what you inherited almost 4 years ago."

Neil Young. (photo: Debi Del Grande)
Neil Young. (photo: Debi Del Grande)


An Open Letter to Donald J. Trump

By Neil Young, Neil Young Archives

19 February 20

 

ou are a disgrace to my country. Bragging about the US economy does not disguise the fact that the numbers today are what you inherited almost 4 years ago.

Your mindless destruction of our shared natural resources, our environment and our relationships with friends around the world is unforgivable.

Your policies, decisions and short term thinking continue to exacerbate the Climate Crisis.

Our first black president was a better man than you are.

The United States of America, my country, is not a green on one of your branded golf courses that you can ride around on and damage so that other players cannot shoot straight.

“Keep on Rockin’ in the Free World” is not a song you can trot out at one of your rallies. Perhaps you could have been a bass player and played in a rock and roll band. That way you could be on stage at a rally every night in front of your fans, if you were any good, and you might be. . .

Every time “Keep on Rockin’ in the Free World” or one of my songs is played at your rallies, I hope you hear my voice. Remember it is the voice of a tax-paying US citizen who does not support you. Me.

I don’t blame the people who voted for you. I support their right to express themselves, although they have been lied to, and in many cases believed the lies, they are true Americans. I have their back.

US justice is ours-not yours.

One of your opponents has the answers I like. He is aiming at preserving our children’s future directly. He is not popular with the democratic establishment because unlike all the other candidates, he is not pandering to the industries accelerating Earth’s Climate Disaster, the end of the world as we know it. He is truly fighting for the USA.

His initials are BS. Not his policies.

We are going to vote you out and Make America Great Again.

Children of Destiny

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 Next > End >>

Page 585 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN