RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
My Family Owns a Grocery Store. The Supply Chain Is a Real Problem. Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=53852"><span class="small">Tori Draeger, Slate</span></a>   
Monday, 30 March 2020 08:15

Draeger writes: "I started working for the family business in high school. I went away to college, came back to work during summers, and finally came back to work full-time."

A woman shops at Trader Joe's on March 23, 2020 in Cambridge, Massachusetts. (photo: Maddie Meyer/Getty Images)
A woman shops at Trader Joe's on March 23, 2020 in Cambridge, Massachusetts. (photo: Maddie Meyer/Getty Images)


My Family Owns a Grocery Store. The Supply Chain Is a Real Problem.

By Tori Draeger, Slate

30 March 20


This as-told-to essay from Tori Draeger, the director of marketing for Draeger’s Market, a Bay Area grocery store chain owned and operated by her family, has been edited and condensed for clarity from a conversation with Joel Anderson.

started working for the family business in high school. I went away to college, came back to work during summers, and finally came back to work full-time. I’m fourth-generation. My dad, Tony, is one of the main Draegers operating the business currently, along with my Uncles Richard, John and Peter and my Aunt Mary Claire. They have all been in the business for 30 or more years, practically since they got out of college. My dad was a night manager in Los Altos, where I started as a checker; my Uncle John was a butcher. Uncle Richard—he’s an operations guy and runs the deli, while Uncle Peter is CFO. Everybody has a unique role to play. My cousin Frankie and I are the next generation. 

I’ve personally had the coronavirus on my radar since early January. I love listening to the radio, where I heard reports coming from China a long time before we Americans got hit. As a family, we started meeting by late February, getting a task force together. We said, “We need to get on this.” When something like this happens, food stores have to be incredibly diligent—the health and safety of our employees and customers are paramount, so we started putting together all sorts of procedures. 

Our Covid-19 task force meets every morning at 6:30 a.m. We have the entire Draeger family on this call, along with all four store directors, the assistant managers, our HR rep, our IT supervisor, and our maintenance manager. Today, our maintenance team was up all night installing sneeze guards. They literally didn’t sleep before this morning’s meeting so they could make sure our checkers were protected. We also have our grocery buyer on the call. We are using everybody’s knowledge and unique ideas to make things as safe as possible. The meetings go for an hour or hour and a half, but touching base in this type of situation is key. 

The meetings originally started with, “What are the policies that need to be put into place? Do we have enough supplies for our own people, like sanitizer? How often do we need to sanitize the carts?” We took the virus very seriously because we knew it could get bad. We considered things like, “Should we close the salad bar, the soup bar?” As it got worse, “yes we should.” We were trying to determine best practices for handling each of these things; the situation is still evolving. 

We’ve made a lot of changes in the stores in terms of trying new health practices. We’ve got blue lines on the floor, marked out 6 feet, in places like the deli, the meat counter, and the registers where people tend to congregate. They’re big blue lines; they’re hokey looking but they do their job. 

We’ve definitely spoken to other local families in the grocery business in the area. We trade best practices and look at what our competitors are doing. We appreciate the cooperation, and we appreciate good ideas no matter where they come from. For example, Safeway had the idea to install sneeze guards five days ago. We installed them last night. They’re big plexiglass barriers that our checkers can see through, hopefully it helps with the non-existent social distance between customers checking out and our staff. We had a hard time getting masks, and even sanitizer right at the start of this. We don’t want to bring home anything to our family, and we don’t want our checkers to get sick, so alternative solutions are what we’re working with. 

Paper bags are another example. All this time, we’ve been teaching people to bring in reusable bags because we want to be environmentally friendly. But then we realized those bags could be a source of cross-contamination. So, now we’re asking people to leave them in the car. We have a “door monitor” at the door, telling customers what’s going on, and why. It’s only a temporary thing. We’ll be able to go back to re-usable bags eventually. 

People have been amazing. We’ve maybe run across one or two grumpy people who do not want to listen to anything we say, but overall, everybody has been really great about all the new health and safety measures. That’s in Los Altos. San Mateo has had more, one or two more grumpy people. People are generally understanding. 

I’ve been in the store checking in Los Altos during all of this—if my employees are on the front lines, so am I. My aunts have been working in the San Mateo and Blackhawk store. What I didn’t realize was how busy we would get. We were seriously overwhelmed with the volume of people coming in at the beginning. We’re a smaller company; this is busier than Christmas time for us. We’re ordering more groceries now than we did for Christmas! 

There’s been a supply chain crunch. It’s been hard. I don’t want to say impossible. I hate to say impossible. We’ve been ordering paper products and having such a hard time—we can’t get anything. We work with a main grocery supplier that used to be a co-op called Unified Grocers. They were bought by SuperValu, and then by UNFI … everything is kind of merging together in the grocery industry right now, which means we only have one main company to go to. They literally told us, “That order you put in? It got canceled.” They don’t have room on their trucks and don’t have enough drivers. I heard that they recently hired 200 new truck drivers, so hopefully we can get the supply chain crunch worked out soon. 

Our stores haven’t gotten a frozen load in two stores in two and a half weeks. If I could get some frozen in, I would be super happy. And I haven’t seen toilet paper in a while. We’re contacting one of the vendors that services our commercial kitchen about individually wrapped toilet paper. This isn’t about making money, it’s about trying to get people what they need. We’re going through every avenue possible to find food. Our grocery buyer has reached out to restaurant supply companies that usually supply much larger commercial-sized packaging with the hope that they may have smaller can sizes. Maybe we’ll get lucky. 

Produce has been great. The produce supply chain has really held up well. The people who usually sell to restaurants are now able to sell some of that product to us, so at least it’s not going to waste. 

One funny thing: There was a run on chicken. Apparently, Californians are in love with chicken. For one week, my husband and I laughed that there was no chicken anywhere in the Bay Area. That’s been cleared up. Our butchers have been working around the clock to get things cleared up. 

We have finally seen the stores quiet down a little. Crowds have died off and we’ve seen far less people coming through the door. It seems people are spending more and purchasing for longer amounts of time. It used to be people would come in daily and pick up whatever they wanted for dinner. We still see a good number of people in the morning during the senior hour, from 7 a.m. to 8 a.m. That’s when people think the new product is there. But if they can, they might consider coming in the afternoon because it’s actually less busy. 

I work very closely with the staff in all our stores, and I do worry that they’re getting tired. They’re working 7 days a week. We have an assistant manager who’s worked 12 days in a row. They’re exhausted, so we as a family have gone to pitch in, to help. We’re hiring as much as we can to help core staff. We’re a union store, so we’re working within union rules. I will say, the union is working with us on that. 

With restaurants and other businesses shutting down, I feel good that we’re hiring. Grocery is a fantastic career path if you treat it as such. I feel like so many people forget that. But grocery as an industry is huge, very important to our daily lives, and provides good, honest work to those willing. 

And our employees are great. Most of them have the “let’s do this. We’re on the front lines, let’s do it!” attitude. The sneeze guard is something we did for them. It was great—one of our employees said very politely, “we would like those sneeze guards that we heard Safeway is using.” Well, we had been trying to source the plastic for them for three days already. The plastic supplier we normally use had sold all of their plastic to Safeway. Luckily our magic maintenance manager Sebastian found a new supplier, and they were installed that night for the next day. 

I have a couple of seniors who work for us who definitely decided that they want to stay home. We’ve been clear that they are encouraged to take the time they need. They’ve got paid leave, paid sick leave, vacation time … just stay healthy and come back to us when this is over. 

I love my family and my family business. The more I learn, the more I realize I need to learn more. It’s great to feel like you’ve got someone in your corner—in this family I’m lucky enough to have 11 people who are all crowded in that corner together. There’s been an amazing outpouring of support from staff and customers alike. Actually, for as horrible a global situation as this is, it’s been great. I’ve seen a lot more good than bad in people; sometimes it takes something like this to remind you how grateful we should be for our very blessed lives. 

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
OK Boomer: How Bob Dylan's New JFK Song Helps Explain 2020 Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=53844"><span class="small">Michael Hogan, Vanity Fair</span></a>   
Sunday, 29 March 2020 13:38

"Bob Dylan has always been a stubborn contrarian, so maybe it's fitting that, after five decades of evading any and all responsibility as a 'voice of a generation,' he is finally embracing it, kind of, at the height of the 'OK Boomer' backlash."

Bob Dylan. (photo: Harry Scott/Getty Images)
Bob Dylan. (photo: Harry Scott/Getty Images)


OK Boomer: How Bob Dylan's New JFK Song Helps Explain 2020

By Michael Hogan, Vanity Fair

29 March 20


“The soul of a nation’s been torn away,” he sings in his first new song in nearly a decade. It’s about Kennedy—and a lot more.

ob Dylan has always been a stubborn contrarian, so maybe it’s fitting that, after five decades of evading any and all responsibility as a “voice of a generation,” he is finally embracing it, kind of, at the height of the “OK Boomer” backlash. His new song, “Murder Most Foul,” which he says in a statement was “recorded a while back,” is an epic, 16-plus-minutes-long murder ballad about the assassination of John F. Kennedy that feels like an otherworldly hybrid of such earlier songs as “Hurricane,” “Idiot Wind,” and “Not Dark Yet.” Listen below.

Before you object to the “OK Boomer” thing, yes, I know that Dylan, born in 1941, is technically a Silent Generation guy. But teen and preteen baby boomers were heavily represented among the generation that felt inspired and galvanized by his politically charged folk music of the early- and mid-1960s. Even at the time, though, he couldn’t resist undercutting a rousing anthem like “The Times They Are A-Changin’” with a cranky blow-off like “It Ain’t Me, Babe.” (“Go away from my window / Leave at your own chosen speed…”)

Much later, in his quasi-memoir, Chronicles: Volume One, Dylan suggested, not entirely believably, that his “voice of a generation” reputation was based on a colossal misunderstanding. Listeners thought he was writing passionately about current events but actually he was writing about stuff he read in the library about…the 1850s and 1860s. His songs weren’t about Civil Rights—they were about the Civil War!

It’s important to remember that nothing Dylan says can ever be taken at face value. This is a man who most recently collaborated with Martin Scorsese on a “documentary” whose infidelity to the truth was so extreme that it included fictionalized characters. But whether or not Dylan really was in a 19th-century state of mind when he wrote “Blowin’ in the Wind,” two things are clear: The song had a huge impact on the living, breathing young people of the 1960s, and that made Dylan deeply uncomfortable.

So what are we to make of this new song? With the world experiencing a global pandemic on a scale not seen since 1918, and with a young generation seething with rage over the fallout from the perceived narcissism and selfishness of the baby boomers who launched him to global fame, Dylan has chosen this moment to release an extremely long song—his first original song in almost a decade, I might add—about the single most chewed-over trauma in the boomer historical hall of fame: the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

One possibility is that, just as he preferred to process the upheavals of the ’60s through the lens of an earlier century, Dylan is only now ready to look squarely at the defining historical tragedy of his own young life. When JFK was killed, on November 22, 1963, Dylan was 22 years old. His second album, The Freewheelin’ Bob Dylan, had come out six months earlier. He had finished recording his third, The Times They Are a-Changin’, which would be released two months later.

In fact, the assassination marks a delineation point in Dylan’s career. Before JFK was killed, Dylan mostly recorded the sincere-sounding folk music that made him famous. After JFK was killed, he got into Rimbaud and LSD and embarked on what would become a lifelong effort to complicate and maybe even kill off the work-shirt-wearin’, protest-song-singin’ Dylan of the popular imagination. When Another Side of Bob Dylan came out, in 1964, the Communist publisher and folk purist Irwin Silber cited it as evidence that Dylan had “somehow lost touch with the people.” A year later, Dylan’s electric set at the Newport Folk Festival would cause enough consternation to spark rumors that the folk icon Pete Seeger took a fire ax to the power cords backstage.

So what’s Dylan’s take on the assassination now? Well, it ain’t Don McLean’s “American Pie,” that’s for sure. The track starts with a low cello drone and some tinkling piano. Then comes Dylan’s voice, sounding less croaky than it often has in recent years, singing rhyming couplets:

’Twas a dark day in Dallas, November ’63,
A day that will live on in infamy.

President Kennedy was a-ridin’ high.
Good day to be livin’ and a good day to die,

Bein’ led to the slaughter like a sacrificial lamb.
He said, “Wait a minute, boys, you know who I am.”

They said, “Course we do, we know who you are.”
Then they blew off his head while he was still in the car.

This is not exactly high modern poetry. If anything, it reads like the kind of workaday poems that newspapers used to publish last century. I imagine Dylan wrote it all down in advance, but I wouldn’t rule out the possibility that he improvised some or even all of it. He is unquestionably one of our era’s most gifted and accomplished writers, but he’s never been afraid to deploy a cliché or an awkward phrase to fill a verse or match a rhyme.

Like most honest chroniclers of the assassination, Dylan invokes the conspiracies without attempting to either confirm or deny their validity:

The day they blew out the brains of the king
Thousands were watching; no one saw a thing.

It happened so quick and so quick by surprise,
Right there in front of everyone’s eyes.

Greatest magic trick under the sun:
Perfectly executed, skillfully done.

After setting the scene, he starts to wax more adventurously poetic. For a brief moment, he gets personal, even autobiographical: “I’m goin’ to Woodstock, it’s the Aquarian Age. Then I’ll go to Altamont and sit near the stage.” As every fan knows, Dylan’s most exciting and creatively fruitful period—the run of immortal albums from Bringing It All Back Home through Highway 61 Revisited and Blonde on Blonde—ended when he crashed his motorcycle in July 1966 and had to convalesce in Woodstock, New York. Arguably, that was the end of his 1960s. But Woodstock has another meaning, of course: The Woodstock music festival in August 1969, with its throngs of scantily clad hippies, was the culmination of the 1960s ethos of peace and free love. That ethos died later that year, at the disastrous Altamont Free Concert, which ended when a Hells Angel “security guard” killed an African American concertgoer who was brandishing a gun during the Rolling Stones’ set.

That’s a lot of innocence-ending packed into two short lines.

Don’t worry, I won’t close-read the whole song. Before too long, it becomes fairly clear anyway what he’s up to. He laments, at great length, the terrible crime of the Kennedy assassination in a style worthy of the chorus from a Greek tragedy. How many ways are there to say that this was an extremely evil act? Very many, as it turns out!

And then, what begins as a sprinkling of pop-cultural references that feel a bit out of place (“Up in the red-light district like a cop on the beat / Livin’ in a Nightmare on Elm Street”) mushrooms into a serial invocation of important art that, for better or worse, calls to mind Woody Allen’s list in Manhattan of things that make life worth living. “Groucho Marx, to name one thing,” Allen begins. “And Willie Mays. And the second movement of the Jupiter Symphony. And, um, Louis Armstrong, recording of ‘Potato Head Blues.’ Swedish movies, naturally.” Etc.

So what is Dylan up to here? What does the JFK assassination have to do with John Lee Hooker and Thelonious Monk and Patsy Cline and Harold Lloyd and Pretty Boy Floyd?

Maybe he is doing the same thing Allen was doing: trying to use his favorite songs and movies as shields against the idea that life is absurd and meaningless. And maybe—I have no idea but maybe?—Dylan is trying to break the chain of political evil by building a chain of artistic goodness. Several of the lyrics suggest that the JFK assassination was the beginning of something very bad. Something that is still plaguing us today:

The day that they killed him, someone said to me, “Son,
the age of the Antichrist has just only begun.”

And:

What’s new, pussycat? What’d I say?
I said, “The soul of a nation’s been torn away

and it’s beginning to go into a slow decay
and that it’s 36 hours past judgment day.”

Maybe this explains why Dylan is releasing this song now. The escalating shittiness of these times has become a running joke, with 2020 making 2019 look like a cakewalk, 2019 making 2018 look like a breeze, and on and on back to 2016, when the election of Donald Trump kicked off a series of events culminating in our collective present: a time when the United States has arguably bungled its response to a global pandemic worse than any other nation in the world.

Can we learn something about our predicament from looking back at the Kennedy assassination? Is that where things really started to go wrong? Maybe. Maybe that’s why Dylan has finally decided to wrestle in public with the legacy of the decade he helped define.

It’s 36 hours past judgment day? You can say that again, Bob.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
'A Dangerous Gamble': Alabama Gov Refuses to Order 'Shelter-in-Place' for Residents, Leaving Black Alabamans Especially at Risk Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=46351"><span class="small">Anne Branigin, The Root</span></a>   
Sunday, 29 March 2020 13:35

Branigin writes: "It looks like Nathaniel Woods isn't the only person Gov. Kay Ivey is willing to put to death."

An interstate in Alabama. (photo: Seth Herald/AFP/Getty Images)
An interstate in Alabama. (photo: Seth Herald/AFP/Getty Images)


'A Dangerous Gamble': Alabama Gov Refuses to Order 'Shelter-in-Place' for Residents, Leaving Black Alabamans Especially at Risk

By Anne Branigin, The Root

29 March 20

 

t looks like Nathaniel Woods isn’t the only person Gov. Kay Ivey is willing to put to death.

The Republican governor announced during a press conference on Thursday that the state would not be enacting “shelter-in-place” measures, which have been shown in other countries to mitigate the disastrous effects of the coronavirus.

From Talking Points Memo:

“Y’all, we are not Louisiana, we are not New York state, we are not California,” Ivey told a reporter who had asked about a potential order. “And right now is not the time to order people to shelter in place.”

The governor asserted that businesses need to stay open to provide food, medical supplies and jobs.

“We’ve got [to] have all the materials that are needed to keep Alabamians working as much as we can,” she said.

Ivey’s talking points mirrored Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves, who earlier this week said his state would be taking a “wait and see” approach to declaring a “shelter-in-place” order.

“No one at the State Department of Health has recommended that we have a statewide shelter-in-place order,” Reeves said.

Shelter-in-place means people need to stay in their homes unless they need to leave for “essential” activities or work. Non-essential workers could still leave their homes to go to the grocery, food bank, pharmacy, laundromat, or walk their pets, but would need to maintain at least 6 feet of distance from other people and practice good hygiene if they do so (washing their hands, coughing into their elbows if they need to, and not touching their face).

So far 21 states and numerous cities have given shelter-in-place orders: all of the West Coast and much of the Northeast and Midwest have directed people to stay at home. Louisiana is the only Southern state that has.

Gov. Ivey is exactly right. Her state is not California—and that’s exactly why she should be concerned.

“Nationally, the rates of infections are doubling every two and a half days,” Dr. Mark Mitchell, associate professor for Climate Change, Energy and Environmental Health Equity at George Mason University, told The Root. “Many of the southern states have more vulnerable populations and less of a health and public health infrastructure than some of the wealthier states.”

Alabamans, compared to Californians, tend to be lower-income, meaning they have less access to healthcare, a demographic fact made worse by Alabama not adopting Medicaid expansion. Rural communities are particularly underserved.

Then there’s the health of Alabamans and other Southerners. The latest research shows people who are overweight or obese are more likely to die from COVID-19 than those who aren’t. Mitchell points out that African Americans across the South tend to have higher rates of obesity and diabetes. Mustafa Santiago Ali, Vice President of Environmental Justice, Climate, and Community Revitalization, notes that communities of color in the state also have high incidents of liver and kidney disease, cancers, lung diseases and asthma—chronic conditions that increase the chances they’ll develop severe COVID-19 symptoms.

“To not do everything in your power to minimize the impacts of this virus places a crosshair on these communities,” Ali told The Root.

Ivey and Reeves aren’t just gambling with the lives of communities of color, either: low wage workers, low-income communities, the elderly, and indigenous populations desperately need the protections the governors refuse to give them.

“When it hits the black belt, when you see how few clinics and hospitals are in those rural areas, there’s no way in the world you’re going to be able to deal with all those cases,” said Ali.

“Shelter-in-place” measures are an important tool governments have to buy time, so health care facilities can continue to provide adequate care to all those who come through its doors—not just COVID-19 patients. By delaying these orders, Ivey, Reeves, and other Southern governors have sent a clear message about their priorities, and who they’re willing to protect.

“Those who are squandering this time where we could be slowing down the epidemic are putting their populations in danger, and putting their health systems in danger of being overwhelmed by the COVID-19 epidemic,” said Mitchell. “It’s a dangerous gamble.”

“More people will get sick, and more people will die,” Ali said. “That’s as clear as I can say it.”

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
What Happens if Workers Cutting Up the Nation's Meat Get Sick? Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=12069"><span class="small">Michael Grabell, ProPublica</span></a>   
Sunday, 29 March 2020 13:29

Grabell writes: "As COVID-19 makes its way across the country, leading to panic grocery buying in state after state, the stresses on the nation's food supply chain have ratcheted ever higher. But in industries like meatpacking, which rely on often grueling shoulder-to-shoulder work, so have the risks to workers' health."

A Koch Foods plant in Morton, Mississippi. (photo: Rory Doyle/ProPublica)
A Koch Foods plant in Morton, Mississippi. (photo: Rory Doyle/ProPublica)


What Happens if Workers Cutting Up the Nation's Meat Get Sick?

By Michael Grabell, ProPublica

29 March 20


As meatpackers rush to meet demand, their employees are starting to get COVID-19. But some workers say they’re going to work ill because they don’t have paid sick days and can be penalized for staying home.

ere’s what has happened in the meatpacking industry in the last week alone:

A federal food safety inspector in New York City, who oversaw meat processing plants, died from the illness caused by the novel coronavirus.

A poultry worker in Mississippi, employed by America’s third largest chicken company, tested positive for the virus, causing a half-dozen workers to self-quarantine. Another worker in South Dakota, employed by the world’s largest pork producer, also tested positive.

In Georgia, dozens of workers walked out of a Perdue Farms chicken plant, demanding that the company do more to protect them.

And Tyson Foods told ProPublica on Friday that “a limited number of team members” had tested positive for the disease.

As COVID-19 makes its way across the country, leading to panic grocery buying in state after state, the stresses on the nation’s food supply chain have ratcheted ever higher. But in industries like meatpacking, which rely on often grueling shoulder-to-shoulder work, so have the risks to workers’ health.

In interviews this week, meat and poultry workers, some in the country without authorization, noted with irony that they have recently been labeled “essential” by an administration now facing down a pandemic. Yet the rules of their workplaces — and the need to keep food moving — pressure them to work in close quarters, even when sick.

And it’s unclear how federal regulations that traditionally protect workers from harm in their workplaces will address a potentially deadly coronavirus.

“They are listening about social distancing on the TV and some of them try to practice it in their home, but when they go to work, they can’t do it,” said Father Roberto Mena, who ministers to many poultry workers at St. Michael Catholic Church in Forest, Mississippi.

Many of the nation’s meatpackers declined to respond to specific questions about how they’ve dealt with infected workers or what they’ve done to try to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 in their plants. Or they offered vague assurances that workers are being protected.

So far, only two meatpacking companies — Tyson Foods and Cargill — have announced companywide temperature checks to screen employees for signs of the virus. Two more say they have begun rolling them out.

But except for unionized plants, meat and poultry workers rarely get paid when they’re sick. At many companies, including Tyson, workers receive disciplinary points for calling in sick. Because points lead to termination, workers told ProPublica, they and some of their colleagues have continued to work even when sick, despite the coronavirus.

“We are all afraid,” said Maria, who works on the evisceration line at a Tyson plant in Arkansas and asked to be identified by her first name. “The problem is if people feel sick, they’re not going to say anything because they need the money. They don’t want the points.”

In an email, Tyson said it had recently altered its policies to allow workers who contract the coronavirus or exhibit symptoms to apply for short-term disability without a waiting period. “This is an evolving situation and we’re continuing to consider additional measures to support our team,” spokesman Worth Sparkman said. “We don’t want team members who feel sick to come to work.”

Tyson announced this month it was “eliminating any punitive effect for missing work due to illness.” But Maria said that at her plant, nothing had changed.

Despite the “essential” role meat and poultry workers play in the food chain, the sick-time bill signed by President Donald Trump last week doesn’t cover most meat and poultry workers because it exempts companies with more than 500 employees.

The uncertain economy, with millions of people filing jobless claims last week, is adding to the tension.

At Koch Foods in Mississippi, Ramirez, an undocumented Guatemalan immigrant who asked to go by his last name, said a woman who worked near him showed up for her shift last week with a heavy cough. But after she told her supervisor, he said, she was told she couldn’t come back. The message was clear, he said. So, when he started feeling sick a few days later, he simply kept quiet and continued working.

“People are worried,” Ramirez said, that if they say they are sick, “they’ll fire us.”

Going to the doctor is not an option, he said, because he doesn’t have health insurance and fears it could expose his immigration status.

Koch Foods didn’t respond to calls and emails asking about its policies for sick workers.

Even before the coronavirus, the meat industry had complained of a labor shortage as low pay and harsh conditions collided with a tight labor market, tighter borders and dramatic reductions by the Trump administration in the number of refugees, who make up the backbone of many plants’ workforce.

While there’s no evidence that the coronavirus can be transmitted through food, workers say they fear it could spread among them, even though they wear butcher coats and latex gloves, and the plants are sanitized every night.

If it does, it could take out a critical cog in the nation’s food supply chain just as it struggles to keep up with increased demand, workers and their advocates said. Grocery meat sales, excluding deli meat, surged a staggering 77% for the week ending March 15, according to one industry analysis.

To meet the demand, companies have been scrambling, adding additional weekend shifts and changing lines to produce whole birds and bigger cuts of beef. Under pressure from unions and wage increases at supermarkets and warehouses, some companies like Cargill and National Beef have announced temporary $2 per hour bonuses for the next several weeks to retain their workers and reward them for sticking through difficult times.

Company executives have said that the empty shelves aren’t a sign of a food shortage and that they’re capable of meeting the surge, aided in part by lower demand from restaurants that have been ordered to close.

“Our primary focus is to keep our plants running so that we can feed America,” Tyson’s president, Dean Banks, said on CNN. “We’re running the plants as hard as we can.”

And some analysts note that even if an outbreak of the virus forced a plant to close, the industry — with more than 500,000 employees at 4,000 slaughterhouses and processing plants across the country — is big enough to absorb the loss.

Tim Ramey, a retired food industry analyst, said “there could be significant disruptions” in a company’s output if an outbreak occurred. But supermarkets and restaurants buy meat from many suppliers, he said, and another plant could pick up the slack.

“There are plenty of ways you could have risk to the worker supply,” Ramey said. “I doubt that would be enough to disrupt the food supply.”

But no one knows what would happen if multiple plants suffered outbreaks.

The closest precedent may be immigration raids, which have temporarily shuttered meat and poultry plants periodically over the last 25 years. For months after, those plants struggled to find new workers and ramp up to speed. But the supply lines continued to feed America.

Some immigrant workers caught up in those raids now marvel that the country is leaning on them. Last summer, after finishing his shift pulling the guts out of thousands of chickens, Ramirez flipped on his TV and watched in shock as immigration agents descended on central Mississippi, rounding up hundreds of his coworkers in the Trump administration’s biggest immigration sting.

In the weeks that followed, Ramirez watched the three children of a friend who’d been detained and hunkered down at home, fearing he could be next. It was easy to feel disposable, he said, especially when Trump praised the raids as “a very good deterrent.”

Now, when Ramirez watches the news, Trump is calling workers like him “critical,” telling them, “you have a special responsibility to maintain your normal work schedule.”

“I don’t understand, if they have a big need for all of the workers,” Ramirez asked, “why aren’t they worried about us?”

The slaughtering of chickens, hogs and cattle has become increasingly automated in the last few decades. But several tasks on the disassembly line still have to be done by hand. In poultry plants, in an area known as “live hang,” workers in a small, black-lit room crowd around a trough grabbing live chickens by their feet and hanging them on shackles.

In another area known as “debone,” workers stand side by side cutting raw chicken into breasts and tenders, so close that they occasionally cut coworkers with their knives.

In pork plants, workers are so packed together that a little over a decade ago, two dozen workers at a Minnesota factory developed a neurological illness from inhaling aerosolized pig brains that drifted from a nearby station that was making an ingredient used in stir-fry thickeners.

So even as everyone from the president to Snoop Dogg are urging people to stay home and avoid groups of more than 10 people, meat and poultry workers are required to do the opposite.

ProPublica asked the nation’s largest meat companies what they were doing to try to achieve social distancing. Cargill, which produces billions of pounds of beef and turkey for supermarkets and restaurants each year, was the only company that said it was doing anything other than staggering start and break times. Daniel Sullivan, a spokesman for the Minnesota-based meatpacker, said it had increased spacing in its factory work areas and put up partitions in its cafeteria.

The evisceration line where Maria, the Tyson employee, works doesn’t have as many people as other parts of the factory because it is heavily automated. But she said that because workers can’t leave the line unless it’s an emergency, she regularly encounters large crowds as everyone rushes to the bathroom during breaks. The company has placed hand sanitizers at the entrance, she said, but inside the plant, the bathrooms don’t always have paper towels.

As COVID-19 cases at the plants become public, workers fear it’s only the beginning.

On Monday, Sanderson Farms, the nation’s third largest chicken company, said an employee at its McComb, Mississippi, plant had tested positive for the virus. Sanderson said the employee’s work area was contained to one small processing table. In response, the company notified its workers and sent six other employees in the work area home to self-quarantine with pay.

The company did not respond to calls or emails seeking additional information.

On Thursday, a worker at pork producer Smithfield Foods’ plant in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, tested positive. The company told the Argus Leader that the employee’s work area and all common areas were “thoroughly sanitized.” But it did not say anything about workers who might have come in contact with the employee.

There have been even fewer details about the federal food safety inspector who died. U.S. Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue said in a statement that he was “terribly saddened to hear” that one of the department’s employees had passed away due to the coronavirus and thanked “those working on the front lines of our food supply chain.” But the department did not specify which plants the inspector had worked in or what had been done to alert or quarantine others the inspector may have been in contact with.

Paula Schelling, a union representative for the nation’s food inspectors at the American Federation of Government Employees, said the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service needs to do more to protect its front-line workers.

“FSIS is doing nothing to provide any protection for any employee who is out in the field,” she said. “They are just saying, ‘We are following the CDC guidelines.’ What does that mean to us?”

Concerns that meat companies aren’t being forthcoming have already led to increased anxiety at several plants. Workers who walked out of the Perdue plant in Georgia said the unrest started because supervisors dismissed concerns that some employees were continuing to work despite being in contact with people who had the coronavirus.

“We’re not getting nothing,” Kendilyn Granville told a TV news reporter outside the plant Monday night. “No type of compensation, no nothing, not even no cleanliness, no extra pay — no nothing. We’re up here risking our life for chicken.”

Perdue spokeswoman Diana Souder said that after speaking with managers, the majority of those who walked out returned to work.

“We know that many are feeling anxious during these uncertain times and we’re doing everything we can to take good care of our associates while continuing to produce safe and reliable food,” she said.

Typically, when workers feel unsafe, they can complain to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. But it’s unclear how OSHA will respond to complaints related to the coronavirus. The agency, which has seen its ranks depleted under the Trump administration, has issued guidance for employers. But there is no specific standard related to the virus, and the agency has not said how it might interpret its general duty clause, which requires employers to keep their worksites free from recognized hazards that might cause death or “serious physical harm.”

Employers are only required to notify OSHA when an employee is hospitalized, suffers an amputation or is killed at work. But under a patchwork of rules, some employers might have to notify their state and local health departments.

As cases started to pop up this week, some employers began offering additional pay. Perdue said it would provide all hourly workers a $1-per-hour raise for the next several weeks. Hormel, the maker of Spam, said it would offer a $300 bonus for full-time workers and $150 for part-time associates.

On Thursday, the United Food and Commercial Workers, which represents 250,000 food processing workers, said it had negotiated additional pay and benefits increases, including a $600 bonus in May for its members at the nation’s second-largest meatpacker, JBS, which includes Pilgrim’s chicken. JBS spokesman Cameron Bruett did not answer whether the company would match that for nonunion employees.

Several large meat and poultry companies, including Tyson, Smithfield, Sanderson and Koch, have not announced raises or bonuses.

On Friday, Perdue told ProPublica it was starting to roll out temperature checks at its plants. And Bruett said JBS had set up “triage stations” outside plants to screen employees for temperature and symptoms. But it’s unclear if all employees will be tested or only those exhibiting symptoms.

Meanwhile, Venceremos, a group advocating for poultry workers in northwest Arkansas, has started a petition asking that Tyson and other processors provide paid sick leave for workers as the coronavirus begins to spread to rural America.

“Everyone is realizing that they are essential and have been essential to the country,” said Magaly Licolli, one of the group’s leaders. “And now it’s time that everybody should demand fair rights for them. That’s what we’ve been arguing all this time. They are the ones that provide for the country.”

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Nationalize Amazon Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=52403"><span class="small">Paris Marx, Jacobin</span></a>   
Sunday, 29 March 2020 13:25

Marx writes: "Instead of letting Amazon use coronavirus to dominate even more of the economy, the company should be nationalized and reoriented to serve the public good instead of predatory capitalism."

An Amazon Fresh truck. (photo: Jacobin)
An Amazon Fresh truck. (photo: Jacobin)


Nationalize Amazon

By Paris Marx, Jacobin

29 March 20


Instead of letting Amazon use coronavirus to dominate even more of the economy, the company should be nationalized and reoriented to serve the public good instead of predatory capitalism.

ith every passing day, it becomes increasingly clear that COVID-19 won’t allow things to go back to normal anytime soon — regardless of how intently Trump and his Republican death cult are prepared to risk millions of lives in service of the stock market. The lengthy disruption will force governments to consider novel ways to get necessary supplies to people without requiring everyone to go to the store themselves — especially those most vulnerable to the virus, and the growing numbers of poor and unemployed who simply won’t have the money.

So, where to turn? The United States Postal Service (USPS) boasts an effective logistics infrastructure but lacks the supply chain to quickly start delivering those essential goods. Yet we already have a monopolistic entity with a strong supply chain that could be repurposed to serve social goals instead of private profit: Amazon.

The e-commerce giant has already seen demand surge as stores have shut down around the country, and as a result the company is hiring a hundred thousand new workers to staff its US fulfillment centers. However, this isn’t simply benevolence on the part of Amazon. The company is making a concerted push to increase its market share to dominate even more of the economy when things go back to normal, and is cutting out third-party merchants that likely won’t survive without access to its platform in the process.

The stories of Amazon’s mistreatment of its warehouse workers are nothing new — from peeing in bottles and being denied air conditioning to having every second of their shifts closely tracked with penalties if they don’t hit their targets. But now the virus has made things worse.

As orders have flooded in, workers are expected to clock overtime, even as they say the company isn’t doing enough to keep them safe from COVID-19. So far cases have been identified in at least ten US fulfillment centers and three in Europe. But workers say they haven’t been given the proper protective equipment, often aren’t informed when a coworker tests positive until they confront management, and are being told to keep three feet from each other, even though the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends six feet. Not all of the warehouses where cases have been identified were even closed for cleaning.

The government needs to act not just to protect those frontline workers, but to ensure it has an infrastructure to respond to the needs of people across the country as the pandemic situation deteriorates. The response should be to nationalize Amazon and integrate it with the USPS.

The key task of a publicly owned Amazon in this moment of crisis would be to maintain the supply chain so it can continue delivering the necessities that people rely on, with priority given to those items. However, it should also begin preparing for the large-scale delivery of packages containing food staples and essential items to every home in the country, making use of the combined labor power of USPS and Amazon delivery workers, but also the infrastructure that only the USPS has: post offices all across the country, even in small rural communities that aren’t economical for private-package delivery companies to service.

Nationalizing the company would also allow Amazon workers to get covered by the same union as postal workers, finally giving workers a voice at the table to negotiate for improved working conditions, proper cleaning and protective equipment, and the wages and benefits they deserve for doing such essential work.

Such a move wouldn’t just benefit the United States. Amazon has online platforms in seventeen different countries. While the US infrastructure would be integrated into the USPS, the infrastructure in those other countries could be worked into their respective postal services, and the international coordination between them could be handled by the same body that has regulated international postage since 1874, the Universal Postal Union (UPU) — which Trump almost pulled the United States out of last year. Each of those national postage systems could rebrand and rework the digital aspect of the Amazon platforms they take over. And, along with the UPU, they could also provide support for other countries to create their own digital infrastructure and establish supply chains to access necessary goods.

But Amazon isn’t just an online e-commerce marketplace. The company has also built and bought many other services over the years that could be useful during this time of crisis. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a cloud computing platform that hosts the digital footprints of many major companies and institutions, including Netflix and several US federal government departments and agencies. Nick Srnicek, the author of Platform Capitalism, has written that the cloud should be placed under public ownership. Taking control of AWS would allow the government to ensure that key digital infrastructures don’t go down during the crisis. It would also allow the government to ensure the cloud platform is serving the public good, and not trying to help oil and gas companies extract more fossil fuels.

Amazon also bought supermarket behemoth Whole Foods in 2017. Placing the chain under public ownership would help ensure access to food for hungry Americans, as well as provide access to spaces for food preparation to scale up social programs like Meals on Wheels. With 3.3 million people having filed for unemployment last week, and the unemployment rate expected to rise as high as 30 percent, the demand for such services could increase very quickly — and people will not be allowed to stand in food kitchens or bread lines due to the virus.

One of the other valuable services that would be obtained from a nationalized Amazon is PillPack, an online pharmacy the company bought in 2018. There are many elderly and vulnerable people who will still need access to their medications while having to stay indoors, and nationalizing the service could allow the United States to start serving those people, shipping their prescriptions in individual dose packages to reduce any confusion that people might have about what to take and when. Additionally, by taking the profit motive out of the equation, those drugs could be provided free of charge.

Taking Amazon into public ownership would quickly enhance the government’s ability to respond to the COVID-19 and economic crises, while allowing it to rectify the negative aspects of the juggernaut: its abuse of its workers, fueling of climate change, and attempts to further monopolize the economy under the control of CEO Jeff Bezos. Combining Amazon with the existing postal infrastructure provides further opportunities to create a public institution that responds to people’s needs with services that make their lives better. A reimagined post office could also be expanded to include postal banking in service of those who have less access to traditional banking services. It could also serve as the distribution point for other necessities such as SIM cards relying on a public telecommunications infrastructure and inexpensive eyeglasses, for example.

In the face of this expanding crisis, getting such infrastructure in place sooner rather than later is essential. Instead of letting Amazon continue as a private monopolist or trying to build a public alternative from scratch in record time, the company should be nationalized and reoriented to serve the public good instead of predatory capitalism, while enhancing the infrastructure of the post office. We have a rare opportunity to fundamentally alter the economy to serve the needs of people instead of private profit, and it’s time to seize it.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 Next > End >>

Page 540 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN