RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
RSN | The Supreme Court: Think Big or Go Without Democracy Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=26125"><span class="small">Bill Simpich, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Thursday, 15 October 2020 12:09

Simpich writes: "Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, and their pals are not the main problem with the Supreme Court. The structure and power of the Supreme Court itself - that's the problem."

People gather for a candlelight vigil to pay their respects to the late U.S. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, outside the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. (photo: EPA)
People gather for a candlelight vigil to pay their respects to the late U.S. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, outside the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. (photo: EPA)


The Supreme Court: Think Big or Go Without Democracy

By Bill Simpich, Reader Supported News

15 October 20

 

my Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, and their pals are not the main problem with the Supreme Court.

The structure and power of the Supreme Court itself — that’s the problem.

It has been a problem throughout the time of the American experiment. You don’t think the courts are political? Go down to the local courthouse, find a seat, and watch the fray for a morning or two. Some ambitious political judges getting into the mix is inevitable. The only thing worse than voting for them is appointing them. The best you can hope for is to prevent the judges from becoming tyrannical. Trust the people — not the judges.

The Republicans have overplayed their hand with Barrett and Kavanaugh — this is an opportunity for a very positive set of reforms, with one big proviso: You can’t fix this court by adding two or four Democrats to the court. You could add twenty or forty Democrats — it would still be innately conservative. It’s the nature of the beast.

The only way to fix the Supreme Court — or any other court — is to subject it to a wide variety of judges who have a wide variety of human experience.

The Supreme Court is conservative no matter which party is in power. Since the eighteenth century, this court has kept down people of color. The treaties with Native Americans have not been honored. The Dred Scott decision kicked off the Civil War. The 1989 decision in Graham v. Connor ensured that it would be virtually impossible to obtain guilty verdicts for excessive force against police officers in the United States.

Economically, the Supreme Court has consistently backed the titans of industry, pushing back the power of the people at every turn. The latest outrage, Citizens United v. FEC, gives corporations the “First Amendment right” to donate unlimited amounts of money to political campaigns — and it’s destroying democracy as we know it. Amending the US Constitution to amend Citizens United is proving to be the work of a generation.

We live in an era where the Supreme Court has way too much power. Here’s how the people can push back.

One important tool is term limits. Federal judges are appointed for life — but there is no rule mandating that a judge appointed to the Supreme Court gets to stay there for life. There are also district court judges (for ordinary cases) and circuit court judges (for the courts of appeal).

Every one of the Supreme Court justices needs to be kicked downstairs and get to see how the other half lives. That can be done with a law passed by Congress.

This battle has already begun — and I predict term limits will pass if the Democrats gain the Presidency and the Senate.

Democrat Ro Khanna recently introduced a bill on the House floor modeled on the proposal of the nonpartisan group Fix the Court. The bill would mandate an eighteen-year term for all justices and then provide for these justices to take “senior status” within the pool of the other federal judges. Each president would get to pick two justices in a four-year term for the next 18 years — it would protect the current eight justices, but appoint new justices without waiting for them to retire.

I think a shorter term like ten years would be even better — and I would not give any of the current justices a grandfather clause. Such a plan is far preferable than a simple tit-for-tat court-packing scheme.

An even more powerful tool is super-majorities. I don’t agree with the notion of court-stripping, because a law saying that judges cannot overrule a bad law is the equivalent of giving a dictator the keys to the highway.

But important statutes like the Affordable Care Act should not be the subject of 5-4 decisions. Such a decision should require a 2/3 majority, or even a 3/4 majority.

The Constitution relies on the President checking Congress with the veto, and with supermajorities in Congress checking the power of the President. There are many good reasons to support Congress passing a particular law with the proviso that it will take a super-majority to override the law on Constitutional grounds — it almost happened during FDR's court-packing battle in 1937.

The goal is to stop both the Republicans and the Democrats from using the Constitution as a political football. Hard decisions — like 5-4 decisions — make bad law. Courts are best at making nuanced decisions, not playing politics.

The most interesting tool would be to re-imagine the court with a “Balanced Bench.” Reconstitute the Supreme Court with ten justices, five chosen by the Democrats and five by the Republicans. Then they have to choose five by a strong supermajority, or no Supreme Court decisions for that year. I don’t think most people are ready for this yet, but think about it.

Law professors Daniel Epps and Ganesh Sitaraman came up with the Balanced Bench — and they suggest an alternative with the “Supreme Court Lottery.” In this scenario, every federal appellate judge becomes an associate justice of the Supreme Court. Then they hear cases in panels of nine justices chosen at random. This would also take the court further away from the political and electoral realm.

The Supreme Court will never be an avenue of social change. With effective push-back, we can prevent it from taking over. This could be done in the next two years, if the Democrats win in November and get serious.



Bill Simpich is an Oakland attorney who knows that it doesn’t have to be like this. He was part of the legal team chosen by Public Justice as Trial Lawyer of the Year in 2003 for winning a jury verdict of 4.4 million in Judi Bari’s lawsuit against the FBI and the Oakland police.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Amid Uncertainty and Upheaval, LeBron Shows Us What an American Should Be Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=52451"><span class="small">Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Guardian UK</span></a>   
Wednesday, 14 October 2020 12:55

Abdul-Jabbar writes: "Watching LeBron motivate his teammates beyond their limits makes him the best on the court, but it's his commitment to the disillusioned and disenfranchised that truly sets him apart."

Lakers star LeBron James won his fourth NBA finals MVP award as Los Angeles won the team's record-tying 17th NBA title on Sunday night. (photo: Erik S. Lesser/EPA)
Lakers star LeBron James won his fourth NBA finals MVP award as Los Angeles won the team's record-tying 17th NBA title on Sunday night. (photo: Erik S. Lesser/EPA)


Amid Uncertainty and Upheaval, LeBron Shows Us What an American Should Be

By Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Guardian UK

14 October 20


Watching LeBron motivate his teammates beyond their limits makes him the best on the court, but it’s his commitment to the disillusioned and disenfranchised that truly sets him apart

inning an NBA championship is nothing new for the Los Angeles Lakers. They have been in the finals a record 31 times since winning the title on their first trip in 1950, and they tied the Boston Celtics with 17 championships after seeing off the Miami Heat on Sunday night. But those are just statistics for superfans to rattle off over steaming pizza or a trivia question on a soggy napkin in a sports bar. Championship playoffs are much more than naked numbers – each has its own unique personality, its own significance to the players and fans, and its own impact on American culture. The game is never “just a game”. For those who think sports are merely mindless entertainment somehow separate from the Sturm und Drang of the world around, you haven’t been paying attention lately. Sports have always been a mirror of national values reflecting all the same struggles and turmoil. This year’s championship series is especially meaningful because, although it took place during one of the most politically and socially chaotic and world-bending times in recent history, in many ways, it was an expression of the finest qualities of America – both on and off the court.

On the court, the Lakers came out of the gate like a thundering juggernaut, relentlessly pummeling the Heat for two games into what many people thought was a defeated heap of expensive athletic shoes. But many people were wrong, and the series went to six games. The NBA finals were much more dramatic than we expected, which is due to the gutsy determination and professionalism of the dedicated players who gave it their all, despite playing under the most restrictive and challenging circumstances in the history of the sport.

That the finals took place at all is a complex blending of capitalism and ingenuity – two things America excels at. The NBA, like all professional sports leagues, needed to make money. But unlike the other leagues, they MacGyvered a safe and responsible way that protected their players, the staff and fans: they housed everyone involved with the teams and the games in a virtual bubble at Walt Disney World in Orlando, Florida, for the several months it would take to complete the season, the playoffs and the finals. On 19 August, the NBA revealed that after testing all 341 basketball players, none were positive for the Covid-19 virus. Yet ,during the first week of the Major League Baseball season, a total of 29 players tested positive. By 21 August, one-third of the teams in baseball had postponed games, likely because of players who didn’t follow safety protocols. The NFL suffered setbacks as well when 23 players and personnel from the Titans and several players from other teams tested positive, causing games to be postponed.

What’s especially impressive about the NBA is that the bubble proved to be more socially responsible than the US president, who in his maskless wonderland facilitated the infections of many who attended a White House ceremony. They also proved to be more patriotic in that they followed government/CDC guidelines, unlike the president. Finally, they proved that residing in a bubble doesn’t mean you live in isolation from your duty to your country or community. They displayed ‘Black Lives Matter’ on the floor of the court and they postponed several games, not because of infections, but because the police shot Jacob Blake, an unarmed black man, in the back seven times.

Though many NBA players throughout the season were vocal about their support for equality, the finals brought the focus on one man as the symbol of the merging of athletics and ethics: LeBron James. To be a symbol, one must excel at their sport. Watching LeBron’s chiseled Mount Rushmore face of determination as he displayed a dazzling blend of agility, grace, power and surgical skill that clearly amped up his teammates to push themselves harder and higher showed he deserves every accolade he gets. But his unwavering willingness to continue to convince the disillusioned and disenfranchised why they need to vote, makes him the embodiment of this NBA championship triumph.

Naturally, the NBA’s expression of social responsibility made it a target for conservatives who wanted it to fail. On 1 September, Trump tweeted: “People are tired of watching the highly political @NBA. … Basketball ratings are WAY down, and they won’t be coming back. I hope football and baseball are watching and learning because the same thing will be happening to them. Stand tall for our Country and our Flag!!!”

Ted Cruz, the Republican senator from Texas, echoed the sentiment by tweeting that the NBA ratings are low because of the politicizing of the league and that he hadn’t watched a single game of the finals for the first time in years. He ended with the hashtag “GoWokeGoBroke”. That really says everything you need to know about the character – or lack thereof – of both men: Never speak out against injustice if it costs you money. These are the sentiments of people born to collaborate with the enemy. To his credit, Mavericks owner Mark Cuban called Cruz out in his own tweet: “A US Senator with 3 @NBA teams in his state, employing thousands of people and he is rooting for their businesses to do poorly.”

It’s bad enough that Trump and Cruz show such a lack of moral leadership that equates ethics with popularity (think which side they’d have been on when slavery, women not voting and killing witches were all popular), but they also are just wrong about weak ratings being a result of rejecting the message. Because of the pandemic, many sports are competing against each other on TV for the first time ever, and it’s affecting all their ratings. The Stanley Cup final, Kentucky Derby, Preakness Stakes, Indy 500 and golf’s US Open have all had ratings declines in the double digits. They also seem totally unaware that as many as 26 million Americans – about one in every 15 – protested against the police killing of George Floyd over the summer. How’s that for popularity, Mr President?

The NBA finals are always about the two best teams battling it out in astounding feats of athleticism and grit. But this year that has called on all of us to endure so much, the finals were also about two teams that want to stand for something more than being the best team, they want to be the best examples. This year LeBron James exemplified what a modern athlete should be, the Lakers exemplified what a team should be, and the NBA exemplified what a professional sports league should be: fiercely dedicated to their sport and passionately committed to their community.

The game is never “just a game”.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: Kidnapping Plans, Nooses and the Boogaloo Militia Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=56639"><span class="small">Greg Palast and Zach D. Roberts, Greg Palast's Website</span></a>   
Wednesday, 14 October 2020 11:27

Excerpt: "How can Trump steal 2020? Violence is part of the recipe. But, there's another part."

Armed protesters provide security for a protest demanding reopening in Lansing, Michigan, on 30 April. Members of the 'boogaloo' movement wear Hawaiian shirts paired with body armor and a military-style rifle. (photo: Jeff Kowalsky/Getty)
Armed protesters provide security for a protest demanding reopening in Lansing, Michigan, on 30 April. Members of the 'boogaloo' movement wear Hawaiian shirts paired with body armor and a military-style rifle. (photo: Jeff Kowalsky/Getty)


Kidnapping Plans, Nooses and the Boogaloo Militia

By Greg Palast and Zach D. Roberts, Greg Palast's Website

14 October 20

 

ote: Zach D. Roberts is either the most courageous member of the Palast Investigations team or the craziest, or both. For the past two years, photojournalist Roberts has been investigating the ultra-Right, traveling–sometimes openly, sometimes under cover–with the Proud Boys and other wannabe storm troopers. It was Roberts who took those horrific photos of neo-Nazis beating a Black school teacher, DeAndre Harris, nearly to death. Filming the perpetrators while a gun was pointed at him, Zach’s photos put five neo-Nazis behind bars.

How can Trump steal 2020? Violence is part of the recipe, Roberts reports… But, there’s another part. As detailed in our new one-minute film PSA, the massive, illegal purge of voters of color, barely reported in the network news, can result in 1.8 million voters blocked at the polling station, as happened in 2016. To prevent another Jim Crow outcome, the Palast Fund has created a website, SaveMyVote2020.org, where voters in Michigan and other states can look up to see if they have been, or are about to be, purged from the voter rolls.

Please: if you know someone in Michigan, make sure they look up to see if they are on the purge list. If so, there’s a link to re-register; it’s not too late.

We had to create the list for Michigan because the prior Administration of the state used Kris Kobach’s racially poisonous Crosscheck list—"aggressively" as these GOP officials told me.

But now that the Democrats have taken control of all statewide offices, why hasn’t Michigan’s new Attorney General returned 152,807 wrongly purged voters to the rolls? In Georgia and Wisconsin, our work has received support and thanks from Stacey Abrams and Mandela Barnes, Lt. Governor of Wisconsin. I can’t help but notice that both these officials are African-American. By contrast, the Democratic Party of Michigan, as I said in the chapter Michigan Mishagass of my book How Trump Stole 2020 , has ignored the GOP attacks on Black, Arabic and Hispanic voters. Why? Fear of a Black Party that would scare away whites? Ignorance? I just don’t know.

I bring up this uncomfortable fact because, in my decades of work on vote suppression, I’ve found that racist attacks on voters are often instigated by Boogaloo bigots and partisan pols like Kris Kobach. But, to be blunt, Jim Crow anti-voter tactics are only sustained by the silent complicity of white politicians who should know better.

Nine months ago, I sat across the table sharing a pizza and a beer with a man who almost certainly was armed.

I asked him, “How do you think tomorrow is going to go?”

He replied, “Either nothing’s going to happen or we’re going to lynch the Governor.”

I awkwardly chuckled, the man across the table did not join me in the laugh. A couple of minutes later he excused himself, grabbing his keys that were sitting on the table which was attached to a U.S. ARMY lanyard.

The next morning, the militiaman, Boogaloo Boys, Proud Boys and thousands of others descended on Virginia’s capital for a rally against the governor’s proposed gun ownership restrictions. No lynching. Not yet.

I thought of that conversation when I heard the news about the thwarted plot to kidnap the Governor of Michigan riled by Democratic Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s ‘lockdown’ of the state to stop the spread of the coronavirus.

If you know anything about militias, you probably know about the Michigan militia. But the media portrayed them as a benign curiosity. Back in 1995, the Chicago Tribune described its founder, Norm Olson, as merely “feisty”. This was just two months after one of their associates,Timothy McVeigh, working with members of the militia, murdered 168 men, women, and children at the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.

The vast threat of the militia movement wasn’t taken seriously then (they were feisty, not dangerous, remember?), and its potential for violence and unrest hasn’t been taken seriously until (hopefully at least) now.

Today, the arrests of the six men facing federal charges around a conspiracy to commit kidnapping of the Governor of Michigan should come as no surprise. Just last month, a Dallas field office FBI internal report, obtained by Ken Klippenstein of The Nation, discussed the threat of “Boogaloo Adherents Likely Increasing Anti-Government Violent Rhetoric and Activities, Increasing Domestic Violent Extremist Threat in the FBI Dallas Area of Responsibility.”

FBI Director Christopher Wray earlier this year noted that the greatest domestic threat to America are these right-wing gangs. However, Wray’s attempt to protect us from these gangsters is frustrated in part by Donald Trump’s restructuring of the Department of Homeland Security’s domestic terror operations and by a far too friendly relationship between these groups and law enforcement.

Now we are dealing with a militia movement that is emboldened by the President’s rhetoric to “LIBERATE MICHIGAN!” and accelerated by disinformation on the internet. No better example of that was seen in Gettysburg over the July 4th holiday where hundreds of militia members and other ‘concerned citizens’ descended on the historic town carrying enough firearms to restart the Civil War.
Which may have been their point.

The men connected to the conspiracy to kidnap the Governor of Michigan, blow up a bridge and potentially murder law enforcement are not quite the militia of Commander Norm Olson’s days. While they train in the woods, wear tactical gear and give themselves fake military rankings, they’re closer to the ‘Boogaloo Movement.’

The Boogaloo Movement is anarchist in philosophy—true anarchists dreaming of a stateless society, an extreme libertarian community of “preppers” —prepared for civil war. Which is why they are armed to the teeth and training with whatever established groups they can.

The Boogaloos take their name from the cult film “Breakin’ 2: Electric Boogaloo.” The movie (not a good one) has nothing to do with a civil war but like so much of our current internet meme culture has evolved from an inside joke to a racist meme to violence in the streets.

Boogaloo Boys are not fascist-leaning like the Proud Boys or the Patriot Front groups. But, in the confusing Venn diagram of far-right extremist movements, will often work together at the same events.

They have no official hierarchy. People who might call themselves Boogaloo in Cleveland, Ohio, could easily disagree with everything that some “Boog” in Lansing, Michigan might believe. Like most groups led by an internet meme, it’s an ever-moving target. Some even attended a Black Lives Matter rally to protect protesters from police! Yet, in the next town, they were seen protecting a Hobby Lobby.

The arrested members of the Wolverine Watchmen, the would-be kidnappers, also adopted Q-Anon and “Three Percenter” memes about child-trafficking. The Watchmen also defended Kyle Rittenhouse who was arrested for killing two progressive protesters in Wisconsin.

One of the accused, Pete Musico, is a fan of both Infowars and prominent Proud Boy, Joey Biggs.

Much like how the Michigan Militia distanced themselves from Timothy McVeigh after the Oklahoma City Bombing but were vital to his plot to murder Federal employees, there’s no doubt that the groups that these Wolverines followed will deny any connection to the plot.

This keeps Bill Fulton, a researcher on domestic terrorism, up at night. The author of The Blood of Patriots, told me, “They’ve always worked together. You’ve always had that, the Venn diagram becomes a circle when it comes to the sovereigns [citizens] and the militias and the hate groups and some of these, more radical evangelical groups, they share massive amounts of membership.”

The question now is, how do these troops read their “Commander’s” signal to, “Stand back and stand by”?

Stand by…for what?

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: An Open Letter to Judge Amy Coney Barrett From Your Notre Dame Colleagues Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=56638"><span class="small">University of Notre Dame Faculty Members</span></a>   
Wednesday, 14 October 2020 11:16

Excerpt: "It is vital that you issue a public statement calling for a halt to your nomination process until after the November presidential election."

Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett gives her opening statement during the Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing in the Hart Senate Office Building on October 12, 2020, in Washington, DC. (photo: Erin Schaff/Getty)
Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett gives her opening statement during the Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing in the Hart Senate Office Building on October 12, 2020, in Washington, DC. (photo: Erin Schaff/Getty)


An Open Letter to Judge Amy Coney Barrett From Your Notre Dame Colleagues

By University of Notre Dame Faculty Members

14 October 20

 

ear Judge Barrett,

We write to you as fellow faculty members at the University of Notre Dame.

We congratulate you on your nomination to the United States Supreme Court. An appointment to the Court is the crowning achievement of a legal career and speaks to the commitments you have made throughout your life. And while we are not pundits, from what we read your confirmation is all but assured.

That is why it is vital that you issue a public statement calling for a halt to your nomination process until after the November presidential election.

We ask that you take this unprecedented step for three reasons.

First, voting for the next president is already underway. According to the United States Election Project (https://electproject.github.io/Early-Vote-2020G/index.html), more than seven million people have already cast their ballots, and millions more are likely to vote before election day. The rushed nature of your nomination process, which you certainly recognize as an exercise in raw power politics, may effectively deprive the American people of a voice in selecting the next Supreme Court justice. You are not, of course, responsible for the anti-democratic machinations driving your nomination. Nor are you complicit in the Republican hypocrisy of fast-tracking your nomination weeks before a presidential election when many of the same senators refused to grant Merrick Garland so much as a hearing a full year before the last election. However, you can refuse to be party to such maneuvers. We ask that you honor the democratic process and insist the hearings be put on hold until after the voters have made their choice. Following the election, your nomination would proceed, or not, in accordance with the wishes of the winning candidate.

Next, the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dying wish was that her seat on the court remain open until a new president was installed. At your nomination ceremony at the White House, you praised Justice Ginsburg as “a woman of enormous talent and consequence, whose life of public service serves as an example to us all.” Your nomination just days after Ginsburg’s death was unseemly and a repudiation of her legacy. Given your admiration for Justice Ginsburg, we ask that you repair the injury to her memory by calling for a pause in the nomination until the next president is seated.

Finally, your nomination comes at a treacherous moment in the United States. Our politics are consumed by polarization, mistrust, and fevered conspiracy theories. Our country is shaken by pandemic and economic suffering. There is violence in the streets of American cities. The politics of your nomination, as you surely understand, will further inflame our civic wounds, undermine confidence in the court, and deepen the divide among ordinary citizens, especially if you are seated by a Republican Senate weeks before the election of a Democratic president and congress. You have the opportunity to offer an alternative to all that by demanding that your nomination be suspended until after the election. We implore you to take that step.

We’re asking a lot, we know. Should Vice-President Biden be elected, your seat on the court will almost certainly be lost. That would be painful, surely. Yet there is much to be gained in risking your seat. You would earn the respect of fair-minded people everywhere. You would provide a model of civic selflessness. And you might well inspire Americans of different beliefs toward a renewed commitment to the common good.

We wish you well and trust you will make the right decision for our nation.

Yours in Notre Dame,

John Duffy, English

Douglass Cassel, Emeritus, Law School

Barbara J, Fick, Emerita, Law School

Fernand N. Dutile, Professor of Law Emeritus

Joseph Bauer, Emeritus, Law School

Jimmy Gurulé, Professor of Law.

Thomas Kselman, Emeritus, History

Catherine E. Bolten, Anthropology and Peace Studies

Karen Graubart, History and Gender Studies

Margaret Dobrowolska, Physics

Aedín Clements, Hesburgh Libraries

Cheri Smith, Hesburgh Libraries

Antonio Delgado, Physics

Atalia Omer, Peace Studies

Eileen Hunt Botting, Political Science

Jason A. Springs, Peace Studies

David Hachen, Sociology

Manoel Couder, Physics

Jacek Furdyna, Physics

Carmen Helena Tellez, Music

Kristin Shrader-Frechette, Biological Sciences, Philosophy

John T. Fitzgerald, Theology

Debra Javeline, Political Science

Philippe Collon, Physics

Cara Ocobock, Anthropology

Amy Mulligan, Irish, Medieval Studies and Gender Studies

Stephen M. Fallon, Program of Liberal Studies and Dept of English

Jessica Shumake, University Writing Program and Gender Studies

Mandy L. Havert, Hesburgh Libraries

Dana Villa, Political Science

Stephen M. Hayes, Emeritus, Hesburgh Libraries

Catherine Perry, Emerita, Romance Languages & Literatures

Olivier Morel, Film, Television, and Theatre.

Darlene Catello, Music

Encarnación Juárez-Almendros, Emerita, Romance Languages & Literatures

James Sterba, Philosophy

Laura Bayard, Emerita, Hesburgh Libraries

Susan Sheridan, Anthropology

Mary E. Frandsen, Music

Mark Golitko, Anthropology

Christopher Ball, Anthropology

Gail Bederman, History

G. Margaret Porter, Emerita, Hesburgh Libraries

Cecilia Lucero, Center for University Advising

Peri E. Arnold, Emeritus, Political Science

Amitava Krishna Dutt, Political Science

Julia Marvin, Program of Liberal Studies

Julia Adeney Thomas, History

Michael C. Brownstein, East Asian Languages & Cultures

Christopher Liebtag Miller, Medieval Institute

Maxwell Johnson, Theology

John Sitter, Emeritus, English

Robert Norton, German

Hye-jin Juhn, Hesburgh Libraries

Denise M. Della Rossa, German

Sotirios A. Barber, Political Science

Pamela Robertson Wojcik, Film, TV and Theatre

Jeff Diller, Mathematics

Ann Mische, Sociology and Peace Studies

Zygmunt Baranski, Romance Languages & Literatures

Robert R. Coleman, Emeritus, Art History

William Collins Donahue, German, FTT, & Keough

Sarah McKibben, Irish Language and Literature

George A. Lopez, emeritus, Kroc Institute

Mark Roche, German

Nelson Mark, Economics

Vittorio Hosle, German, Philosophy and Political Science

Tobias Boes, German

A. Nilesh Fernando, Economics

Fred Dallmayr, Emeritus, Philosophy and Political Science

Greg Kucich, English

Kate Marshall, English

Mark A. Sanders, English

Christopher Hamlin, History

Meredith S. Chesson, Anthropology

Ricardo Ramirez, Political Science

Stephen Fredman, Emeritus, English

Dan Graff, History and the Higgins Labor Program

Henry Weinfield, Program of Liberal Studies (Emeritus)

Mary R. D’Angelo, Theology (Emerita)

Asher Kaufman, Kroc Institute, History

Stephen J. Miller, Music

Janet A. Kourany, Philosophy and Gender Studies

Michelle Karnes, English

Jill Godmilow, Emerita, Film, Television & Theatre

Mary Beckman, Emerita, Center for Social Concerns

Clark Power, Program of Liberal Studies

Richard Williams, Sociology

Benedict Giamo, Emeritus, American Studies

Ernesto Verdeja, Political Science and Peace Studies

Catherine Schlegel, Classics

Margaret A. Doody, English, Professor Emerita

Marie Collins Donahue, Eck Institute of Global Health

David C. Leege, Emeritus, Political Science

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Is It Time to Call in the UN Elections Monitors? Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=11104"><span class="small">Charles Pierce, Esquire</span></a>   
Wednesday, 14 October 2020 08:16

Pierce writes: "Republicans have said vote-by-mail will be a problem-and in California, they seem determined to make it so."

A voter drops a ballot at a mail-in ballot drop off box location in Hoboken. (photo: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg)
A voter drops a ballot at a mail-in ballot drop off box location in Hoboken. (photo: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg)


Is It Time to Call in the UN Elections Monitors?

By Charles Pierce, Esquire

14 October 20


Republicans have said vote-by-mail will be a problem—and in California, they seem determined to make it so.

sn't it time to call in the United Nations monitors?

The post, from Jordan Tygh, a regional field director for the California Republican Party, encouraged people to message him for “convenient locations” to drop their own ballots. The problem is the drop box in the photo is not official – and it could be against the law. The California Secretary of State has received reports in recent days about possible unauthorized ballot drop boxes in Fresno, Los Angeles and Orange counties, agency spokesman Sam Mahood said Sunday evening. Reports place such boxes at local political party offices, candidate headquarters and churches.

Secretary of State Alex Padilla said his office is coordinating with local elections officials to look into the reports. Only county elections officials can oversee ballot drop boxes, choosing the number, location, hours of operation and other details. County registrars are charged with making sure every box follows strict state guidelines for security, including making sure they can’t be tampered with and tracing the chain of custody of all ballots.

I'm serious. This is a job for those folks that Jimmy Carter ran with overseas, who knew kabuki democracy when it punched them in the nose. In yet another sentence I never thought I'd write: Tom Friedman is right. The call to ratfcking is right out in the open now, straight from the Truman balcony and streaming outward, like industrial runoff into a river, to all points of the compass.

But Friedman is too limited in his thinking. While the president* has brought it out into the open, rigging elections through manifestly discriminatory means has been a vital part of Republican electoral strategy since William Rehnquist was bullyragging Hispanic voters in Arizona back in the early 1960s. It has reached a positive frenzy ever since Chief Justice John Roberts declared the Day of Jubilee in Shelby County v. Holder. Now, all that's different is that nobody is pretending any more.

Reports came out Saturday night about a metal box in front of Freedom’s Way Baptist Church in Castaic that had a sign matching the one on the Orange County box. The church posted on social media that the box was “approved and brought by the GOP.” The post said church officials don’t have a key to the box and that GOP officials picks up the ballots. A pastor for the church didn’t respond to a request for comment. On its website, the Fresno County Republican Party also shared a list of “secure” ballot collection locations. None are official county drop box sites, with the local GOP instead listing its own headquarters, multiple gun shops and other local businesses.

And this is the ethical and moral context in which Judge Amy Coney Barrett is willing and able to take a lifetime position on the Supreme Court from this President of the United States. No person of character would do that.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 Next > End >>

Page 324 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN