RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Obama's New Normal: The Drone Strikes Continue Print
Thursday, 26 December 2013 14:31

Goodman writes: "There has been yet another violent attack with mass casualties. This was not the act of a lone gunman, or of an armed student rampaging through a school. It was a group of families en route to a wedding that was killed."

An MQ-9 Reaper at Creech Air Force Base. (photo: Lance Cheung/USAF)
An MQ-9 Reaper at Creech Air Force Base. (photo: Lance Cheung/USAF)


Obama's New Normal: The Drone Strikes Continue

By Amy Goodman, Guardian UK

26 December 13

 

Americans abhor mass shootings in our communities, but why do we allow our government to kill so many innocents abroad?

here has been yet another violent attack with mass casualties. This was not the act of a lone gunman, or of an armed student rampaging through a school. It was a group of families en route to a wedding that was killed. The town was called Radda – not in Colorado, not in Connecticut, but in Yemen. The weapon was not an easy-to-obtain semiautomatic weapon, but missiles fired from US drones.

On Thursday, 12 December, 17 people were killed, mostly civilians. The London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism has consistently tracked US drone attacks, recently releasing a report on the six months following President Barack Obama's major address on drone warfare before the National Defense University (NDU) last May. In that speech, Obama promised that "before any strike is taken, there must be near-certainty that no civilians will be killed or injured – the highest standard we can set." The BIJ summarized:

Six months after President Obama laid out US rules for using armed drones, a Bureau analysis shows that covert drone strikes in Yemen and Pakistan have killed more people than in the six months before the speech.

In a nation that abhors the all-too-routine mass killing in our communities, why does our government consistently kill so many innocents abroad?

One significant problem with assessing the US drone-warfare program is its secrecy. US officials rarely comment on the program, less so about any specific attack, especially where civilian deaths occur. As Obama admitted in the speech, "There's a wide gap between US assessments of such casualties and nongovernmental reports. Nevertheless, it is a hard fact that US strikes have resulted in civilian casualties." The BIJ's estimate of the death toll from US drone strikes during the past 12 years in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia is well over 4,000.

While the US media shower attention on the hypothetical prospects that in the next few years, Amazon.com will deploy clever little drones to deliver your holiday orders, it is important to take a hard look at what these airborne robots are actually doing now. "Democracy Now!" correspondent Jeremy Scahill has been exposing US covert warmaking for years, most recently in his book and film "Dirty Wars." The film was just shortlisted for an Oscar for best documentary. After the Academy Award nomination was made, he told us,

I hope that people pay attention to these stories, that Americans will know what happened to the Bedouin villagers in al-Majalah, Yemen, where three dozen women and children were killed in a US cruise missile strike that the White House tried to cover up.

In his NDU address, Obama said, "We act against terrorists who pose a continuing and imminent threat to the American people." Neither Obama nor any of his aides have explained just what kind of threat the wedding convoy presented to the American people. The government of Yemen, following local custom, made reparations to the victimized families, reportedly delivering 101 Kalashnikov rifles and a little over $100,000.

These rural villages in Yemen are caught in the middle of a violent conflict, as Human Rights Watch wrote in an October report titled "Between a Drone and al-Qaida." Just one month to the day before Obama gave his address at the NDU, Farea al-Muslimi, an eloquent young Yemeni man who spent a year attending a US high school, spoke before a congressional hearing. Six days before he testified, a drone strike hit his village of Wessab.

Farea said (pdf): "What Wessab's villagers knew of the US was based on my stories about my wonderful experiences here. ... Now, however, when they think of America, they think of the terror they feel from the drones that hover over their heads, ready to fire missiles at any time. What the violent militants had previously failed to achieve, one drone strike accomplished in an instant. There is now an intense anger against America in Wessab." He ended his testimony with the hope that "when Americans truly know about how much pain and suffering the US air strikes have caused ... they will reject this devastating targeted killing program."

The scenes of senseless violence in the US form a list of sorrow and loss: Columbine, Tucson, Aurora, Newtown, Littleton. With the ongoing work of committed activists, courageous journalists and responsible officials, perhaps Americans will recite as well the names Gardez, Radda, al-Majalah, Mogadishu and the many more sites of drone strikes still cloaked in secrecy.

  • Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.
e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Transatlantic Trade Agreement Threatens Environment and Health in US and Europe Print
Thursday, 26 December 2013 14:30

Pica writes: "Negotiations between the United States and European Union for a free trade agreement, which resumed this week in Washington, represent one of the biggest threats we have seen in our lifetimes to an environmentally sustainable and socially just world."

Washington is dooming workers in their twenties and thirties. (photo: M. Scott Mahaskey/Politico)
Washington is dooming workers in their twenties and thirties. (photo: M. Scott Mahaskey/Politico)


Transatlantic Trade Agreement Threatens Environment and Health in US and Europe

By Erich Pica, The Huffington Post

26 December 13

 

egotiations between the United States and European Union for a free trade agreement, which resumed this week in Washington, represent one of the biggest threats we have seen in our lifetimes to an environmentally sustainable and socially just world.

The deal, known as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, is billed as the biggest bilateral free trade agreement in history. It is being touted as a means to boost trade and create jobs, but in reality the United States already has free trade with Europe, and vice versa. Tariffs are already low and the exchange of goods and services is robust.

Friends of the Earth U.S. and Friends of the Earth Europe are deeply concerned that the negotiating objectives for an agreement have little to do with free trade and everything to do with corporate power. TTIP risks being a partnership of those who seek to prevent and roll back democratically agreed safeguards in areas such as food and chemical safety, agriculture and energy.

What we fear the negotiations really aim for is a massive weakening of standards and regulations for the protection of people and our environment. Such rules are branded "trade irritants," making them seem like an annoying itch for the corporations that have to adhere to them. These companies would therefore like to see them removed, irrespective of the fact that the very reason for these rules' creation is to protect citizens, consumers and nature.

Friends of the Earth U.S. and Friends of the Earth Europe know what it is to be partners. We believe our governments should be partners, too, in building a more equitable and sustainable future. But our common analysis is that the TTIP is unlikely to do this. For the time being we see corporations and financiers as the only partners. And we certainly don't see citizens as partners when the details of the negotiations are being kept secret from the public.

This week's talks, like the previous rounds, will happen behind closed doors. The negotiating texts will be kept secret from the public, but not from the approximately 600 corporate representatives who have been named "cleared advisors" for the United States.

More reason for our fear that this is a partnership for profits, not people or planet, is the provision of an "investor-state dispute settlement" mechanism -- perhaps the most dangerous TTIP negotiating objective. This would enable corporations to claim potentially unlimited damages in secret courts or arbitration panels if their profits are adversely affected by environmental or consumer regulations. These investment suits are tried before business-friendly tribunals composed of corporate lawyers, bypass domestic courts and override the will of parliaments. Even expected future profits are compensable.

Under other existing investor-state agreements, challenges to environmental policy are already being brought by oil and gas companies, mining operations, the nuclear industry, and pharmaceutical giants that deem that their investment potential and related profits are being damaged by regulatory or policy changes.

We believe there is much for American and European citizens to be concerned about in these trade talks -- not least the investor-state dispute settlement provision. Also at stake are regulations on genetically engineered products, food safety, toxic chemicals, highly polluting fuels, and many others. The EU's fuel quality directive, which disadvantages tar sands oil and other fuels with a high carbon footprint, is on U.S. Trade Representative Mike Froman's hit list. And food safety measures have been targeted as trade barriers, including restrictions on imports of beef treated with growth hormones, chicken washed in chlorine and meat produced with growth stimulants.

Friends of the Earth in Europe and the United States are determined to alert policymakers and the people about the deception and danger in the current course of the TTIP negotiations. We are calling for an end to the secrecy. People, not corporations, should determine the future of the transatlantic economy, including what kind of future we want for our children.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS | David Brooks Is Having a Blue Christmas Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=11104"><span class="small">Charles Pierce, Esquire</span></a>   
Thursday, 26 December 2013 13:00

Pierce writes: "Oh, no. Another icon falls. And David Brooks gets another boo-boo. So what led to the Red Lobster's unfortunate demise? ... People are opting to pick chains like Chipotle over Red Lobster or Olive Garden, as the former tends to take less time than a sit-down restaurant and cost less."

New York Times columnist David Brooks. (photo: unknown)
New York Times columnist David Brooks. (photo: unknown)


David Brooks Is Having a Blue Christmas

By Charles Pierce, Esquire

26 December 13

 

h, no. Another icon falls. And David Brooks gets another boo-boo.

So what led to the Red Lobster's unfortunate demise? Since the economic downturn, restaurants similar to Red Lobster have suffered as consumers have become more careful about how they spend their money. People are opting to pick chains like Chipotle over Red Lobster or Olive Garden, as the former tends to take less time than a sit-down restaurant and cost less.

So what does this have to do with Public Intellectualism and the study of Humility, you ask? Well, even though he is most closely associated with Applebee's and its salad bars, which actually do exist, Red Lobster figures prominently in Sasha Issenberg's epic takedown of David Brooks in Philadelphia Magazine.

"On my journeys to Franklin County, I set a goal: I was going to spend $20 on a restaurant meal. But although I ordered the most expensive thing on the menu - steak au jus, 'slippery beef pot pie,' or whatever - I always failed. I began asking people to direct me to the most-expensive places in town. They would send me to Red Lobster or Applebee's," he wrote. "I'd scan the menu and realize that I'd been beaten once again. I went through great vats of chipped beef and 'seafood delight' trying to drop $20. I waded through enough surf-and-turfs and enough creamed corn to last a lifetime. I could not do it."

Taking Brooks's cue, I lunched at the Chambersburg Red Lobster and quickly realized that he could not have waded through much surf-and-turf at all. The "Steak and Lobster" combination with grilled center-cut New York strip is the most expensive thing on the menu. It costs $28.75. "Most of our checks are over $20," said Becka, my waitress. "There are a lot of ways to spend over $20."

They should at least leave the one in Chambersburg open, and rename the surf-and-turf after David Brooks, who is neither.



Charlie has been a working journalist since 1976. He is the author of four books, most recently "Idiot America." He lives near Boston with his wife but no longer his three children.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Sympathy for Justine Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=28803"><span class="small">Michelle Goldberg, The Nation</span></a>   
Thursday, 26 December 2013 09:24

Goldberg writes: "Justine Sacco deserved to lose her job for her idiotic tweet about AIDS in Africa. She worked in public relations at IAC, a big Internet company, and was responsible for an epic Internet public relations disaster."

 (illustration: ABC News)
(illustration: ABC News)


Sympathy for Justine

By Michelle Goldberg, The Nation

26 December 13

 

ustine Sacco deserved to lose her job for her idiotic tweet about AIDS in Africa. She worked in public relations at IAC, a big Internet company, and was responsible for an epic Internet public relations disaster. But the gleeful way she was publicly destroyed as she was stuck in the air, unaware and unable to respond or delete her social media accounts, is still chilling. We've built ourselves a panopticon in which any one of us can be singled out for minor transgressions and transformed into a meme for jeering global flagellation. Almost any of us could be vulnerable to a crowd-sourced inquisition.

It's still not clear whether Sacco's infamous tweet-"Going to Africa. Hope I don't get AIDS. Just kidding! I'm white"-was a very bad racist joke or a very bad joke about racism. Consider a structurally similar quip that appeared on Twitter a couple of days ago: "Going to NYC, hope I don't get stopped and frisked. Just kidding! I'm white." Is it possible that Sacco meant something similar? Certainly, her gibe lacks the bitter logic of the stop-and-frisk joke, but the intention behind it is still ambiguous.

Of course, intention is not the same as effect. Whatever Sacco meant, her tweet was gross and offensive. But it was just one of many, many gross and offensive tweets that continuously pollute the Internet. Even if we assume the worst about Sacco-which the Internet, naturally, did-she still didn't deserve to become, as a Buzzfeed headline put it, "The World's Top Story," covered by The New York Times, CNN, BBC and other major outlets worldwide. She didn't deserve to have her father dragged into it, via a citizen journalist who tracked him down at the airport while he waited for his daughter. She didn't deserve to then have her father's denunciation of her-he reportedly said he was "incredibly ashamed of her" and called her a "fucking idiot"-broadcast to the world. She didn't deserve to be treated like a monster on par with Ariel Castro.

READ MORE: Sympathy for Justine


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Merry Christmas From the GOP: Unemployment Benefits End for 1.3 Million Families Print
Wednesday, 25 December 2013 16:26

Creamer writes: "Over the last decade the far right, that now dominates the GOP, has conducted a real war on the values that we celebrate at Christmas."

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-ILL) and Senator Patty Murry (D-WA) announce the budget deal. (photo: NBC)
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-ILL) and Senator Patty Murry (D-WA) announce the budget deal. (photo: NBC)


Merry Christmas From the GOP: Unemployment Benefits End for 1.3 Million Families

By Robert Creamer, Reader Supported News

25 December 13

 

hree days after Christmas, unemployment benefits end for 1.3 million people who have exhausted their state unemployment benefits, but still can't find a job.

To be eligible for unemployment benefits, you have to be actively looking for a job. Virtually all of these people would rather work, but can't find a job in today's economy where there are three applicants for every job available.

But when the budget deal was negotiated in Congress over the last several weeks, Republican negotiators refused to agree to continue those unemployment benefits. And at the same time, they demanded the continuation of tax breaks for big oil companies and loopholes for Wall Street billionaires who get their income from hedge funds.

Merry Christmas from the GOP.

Of course this kind of Christmas cheer comes from the same gang that routinely drags out the well-worn charge that progressives and Democrats are engaging in a "war on Christmas." Maybe someone should force Republican Members of Congress to sit through a showing of "A Christmas Carol" and then explain why they think Ebenezer Scrooge is the hero.

Over the last decade the far right, that now dominates the GOP, has conducted a real war on the values that we celebrate at Christmas.

In case they missed it, Christmas is about giving, and sharing and loving your neighbor. It's about family. Christmas has nothing to do with greed or selfishness or paying people poverty level wages so you can maximize your bottom line.

The Christmas spirit is not about cutting off an economic lifeline for over a million people so the wealthiest in the land can continue to prosper beyond imagining. And remember many of those same wealthy people who are doing so well are personally responsible for the recklessness that caused the Great Recession and cost the jobs of those whose unemployment benefits they now believe we can "no longer afford."

You hear a lot from the right wing about having to make "tough choices" because some things "we just can't afford." Ironically those "things we cannot afford" never include the things that benefit the very wealthy.

In fact, as surprising as it may seem to many Americans, there is more bounty in the land this Christmas, than at any time in our nation's history. Our income per capita - and our productivity per person - has increased by 80% over the last 30 years. But over those same 30 years, average incomes for most Americans were stagnant - and virtually all of that increased income and wealth went to the top 1%.

That is bad enough. But then to insist that our country "can't afford" to continue paying unemployment benefits to people who can't find a job - and by the way - cut off their benefits three days after Christmas - that is an outrage.

Many on the right are so out of touch with ordinary Americans that they argue that providing unemployment benefits makes people "dependent." This of course completely ignores the fact that to qualify you have to have been working and lost your job for no fault of your own; you have to be actively looking for work; and the maximum benefits in many states are very low.

Ask the Koch brothers to support a family on the $258 per week maximum benefit in Louisiana, or the $275 per week maximum benefit in Florida - or even the $524 per week maximum benefit in Ohio.

People don't want to stay on unemployment benefits. They want to find a job that provides them with income and benefits that allow them to give a better life to their families and their kids. They want to make a contribution and feel that they do worthwhile work. Most Americans want to be proud of what they do for a living - they don't want to be "dependent" on anyone.

You have to be from another planet to believe that most people will become "dependent" on a total income of $275 per week.

Unemployment benefits provide workers and their families with an economic shot in the arm to get them through being laid off in an economy when jobs are still hard to come by.

And let's be real clear why jobs are so hard to come by. Jobs are still hard to come by because of the policies of those very same right wing politicians who refused to reign in the orgy of reckless speculation on Wall Street that resulted in a ruinous financial collapse from which the economy is still recovering.

Jobs would be a lot easier to come by if the GOP did not do everything it could to block President Obama's American's Jobs Act that would create millions of jobs in both the public and private sectors by investing in teachers, and infrastructure.

Jobs would be a lot easier to come by if the GOP were not fixated on cutting government investment at a time when virtually all economists - including the Federal Reserve Chairman - believe we need more fiscal stimulus and that the policy's of the Republicans in Congress continue to be a major drag on economic growth.

In fact the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that failing to continue federal unemployment benefits will cost the economy 240,000 jobs and slow the growth of the overall economy by .2%.

Those who receive unemployment benefits spend virtually every dime on the goods and services they need to live. That spending provides jobs to thousands of other Americans. So cutting federal unemployment benefits will actually create a quarter million more people who are unemployed. Great work GOP.

So here is the bottom line. It turns out that a society that reflects the spirit of Christmas - one where we have each other's back - where we care about each other and not just ourselves - a society like that is better for everyone.

In fact, it turns out that the "moral" thing to do - the "right" thing to do - is also the "smart" thing to do.

It turns out that progressive values like loving your neighbor as your self - are the most precious possessions of humanity because they are the values that will allow us and our children to prosper and survive.

And that's why the spirit of Christmas doesn't just belong to Christians - or Catholics or Baptists or Episcopalians - or anyone. The Christmas spirit belongs to everyone on our small fragile planet. And that spirit embodies exactly the set of values that we must use to chart our course not just on Christmas Day but 365 days each year - including December 28th when over a million families will lose the economic lifeline that provides them a bridge to a better life.



Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 2991 2992 2993 2994 2995 2996 2997 2998 2999 3000 Next > End >>

Page 2996 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN