RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Five Things to Know About Princeton Violating Title IX Print
Sunday, 09 November 2014 14:00

Bolger writes: "Sexual violence is an economic justice issue — and the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) gets it."

Know Your IX’s ED ACT NOW protest outside the Department of Education in July 2013. (photo: knowyourix.org)
Know Your IX’s ED ACT NOW protest outside the Department of Education in July 2013. (photo: knowyourix.org)


Five Things to Know About Princeton Violating Title IX

By Dana Bolger, Feministing

09 November 14

 

exual violence is an economic justice issue — and the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) gets it.

On Wednesday, the OCR found Princeton University out of compliance with Title IX, the 1972 civil rights law that prohibits sex discrimination in education. As we’ve covered before, Title IX protects survivors of gender-based violence (female, male, and genderqueer) and requires schools to take steps to prevent violence and respond to it after it happens.

As an anti-violence organizer, I reacted to the OCR decision with all sorts of excitement/disappointment/cautious optimism and so, without further ado, here are the five things you need to know about the decision:

  1. OCR found that Princeton violated Title IX by perpetuating a hostile environment and failing to take prompt, equitable action to address complaints of sexual violence and harassment.

  2. In an increasingly frequent move, OCR issued a public finding of non-compliance against the university. This effort at transparency is new for the Office, which for years disclosed findings of rampant violations to victim-complainants behind closed doors while announcing vague non-findings to the public — which universities (like Yale) quickly spun as compliance. This new transparency represents a real victory for student activist groups, which have been calling on the Department for years to increase transparency both during investigations and at their conclusions.

  3. In addition to broader policy changes, OCR publicly required Princeton to take steps to support three individual victims — again, a new effort on the part of the Office. For instance, Princeton must remedy, in part, the financial impacts of violence on these survivors, including tuition reimbursement and counseling costs. Survivor activist groups like Know Your IX, the group I co-direct, have been working to highlight gender-based violence as an economic justice issue, and yesterday, along with the United States Students Association, called on the Department to clarify universities’ obligations to ameliorate the financial barriers that prevent gender-based violence survivors from accessing education. We wrote:

Survivors have testified to the effects of violence, including its economic consequences. These impacts include dropping out of school, taking leaves of absence, or seeing a drop in grades due to the trauma of the assault itself or mistreatment. Although further study is needed, it has become increasingly obvious that the violence survivors experience, compounded with the financial consequences of such, often jeopardizes their ability to get an education, with enduring consequences throughout their lives.

  1. The OCR investigation lasted four years. That’s unacceptable. In the life of a survivor on campus, four days — let alone four years — of being forced to eat in the same dining hall as one’s rapist or study in the same library as one’s abuser, is an eternity. Almost without a doubt, the survivors in the Princeton case must have graduated (or taken time off, or dropped out) before they could receive relief.

  2. OCR found Princeton violated Title IX but issued no formal sanction against it. That’s due in part to the bluntness of the only sanction available to the Department (removing all federal funds from the university, which would be devastating for students) and underscores the need for Congress to grant the Department more nuanced penalties. Fortunately, legislation is in the works!

Princeton was one of 85 colleges and universities under investigation for sexual violence-related Title IX violations. Here’s to hoping the Department keeps up the trend of holding institutions accountable, supporting survivors, and challenging hostile campus environments — much more quickly.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS | Is Arlington County, VA Racist? Print
Sunday, 09 November 2014 13:10

Parry Writes: "Arlington, Virginia, is like many communities in the South, unwilling to confront both the vestiges of slavery/segregation and always susceptible to new packaging for racial divisions. This reality was apparent in a hard-fought contest for the County Board in which the central issue was whether to build a light-rail commuter line to service the poorer and more racially diverse part of the county."

John Vihstadt. (photo: Katherine Frey/WP)
John Vihstadt. (photo: Katherine Frey/WP)


Is Arlington County, VA Racist?

By Robert Parry, Consortium News

09 November 14

 

urely, the upwardly mobile white professionals who live in the stylish neighborhoods of North Arlington, a close Metro commute to Washington DC, don’t consider themselves racist. Nor does Arlington County in general, believing that it left behind the bad old days of racial segregation in the 1960s.

But Arlington, Virginia, is like many communities in the South, unwilling to confront both the vestiges of slavery/segregation and always susceptible to new packaging for racial divisions. This reality was apparent in a hard-fought contest for the County Board in which the central issue was whether to build a light-rail commuter line to service the poorer and more racially diverse part of the county.

The Republican/Tea Party candidate John Vihstadt, running as an “independent,” made opposition to the Columbia Pike Streetcar the centerpiece of his campaign and he received strong support from wealthier, whiter North Arlington, where there is much resistance to investing in infrastructure for the historically black part of the county, south of Arlington Boulevard (also known as U.S. Route 50).

Vihstadt had the backing of the local newspaper, the Sun-Gazette, which doesn’t even bother to distribute in much of South Arlington because its residents aren’t the newspaper’s desired demographic. Vihstadt also won the support of the neoconservative Washington Post.

So, it wasn’t entirely a surprise when Vihstadt soundly defeated the Democratic nominee, Alan Howze, who supported the Streetcar as a necessary step toward balanced development in Arlington County and toward strengthening the community’s tax base.

But this local race said a lot about the issue of race that still percolates just below the surface in the Old Confederacy. It is a topic that I have witnessed up close since moving to Arlington in the 1970s, what might be called the post-segregation period.

‘The Schools’

In 1977, after being transferred to Washington by the Associated Press, I rented a house in North Arlington and – as I looked around for where to buy – I was warned by neighbors that I should avoid South Arlington because of “the schools.” It soon became clear to me that “the schools” was code for South Arlington’s racial diversity.

So, I decided to buy a house in South Arlington and all four of my children attended “the schools.” But what I hadn’t expected was that Arlington County, which had long neglected the black and brown neighborhoods of South Arlington, would not only continue that segregation-era behavior, but escalate it.

While one might have hoped that Arlington County would want to respond to the end of segregation by pouring more public monies into South Arlington to equalize the infrastructure of the county’s two halves, the local governments (county, state and regional) did the opposite. They poured billions upon billions of dollars into the whiter, wealthier North Arlington, particularly around the Metro’s Orange Line.

Meanwhile, the neglect continued for South Arlington. One of the few major county projects for South Arlington was to expand the sewer treatment plant to handle the increased sewage flow from North Arlington. Other spending on South Arlington always seemed to get slow-rolled or killed outright.

The original Metro plan had called for a subway line going down Columbia Pike, the shabby commercial corridor through South Arlington. But that was eliminated for cost reasons. So, a decade ago, the Columbia Pike neighborhoods accepted a much cheaper light-rail commuter line as a consolation prize, but it was delayed for years before finally getting green-lighted by Democrats on the County Board.

Tea Party Opposition

However, once the Columbia Pike Streetcar became a real possibility, well-funded opposition – much of it from North Arlington and from Northern Virginia’s Republican/Tea Party elements – took aim at the project as too expensive and at members of the County Board who okayed it.

The issue played perfectly into the Tea Party formula: hostility to government projects in general mixed with a slight odor of racism. The Streetcar was a project that would primarily make it easier for racial minorities living near Columbia Pike to go shopping or get to work. There was an attitude among some North Arlingtonians that those people should be satisfied with buses.

Pitching himself as an “independent” – even with support from Arlington’s small anti-development Green Party – Vihstadt cleverly exploited North Arlington’s resentment toward spending money on South Arlington. Indeed, his first County Board campaign only highlighted attacks on capital improvements in South Arlington, particularly the Streetcar which he parodied with a photo of a Rice-a-Roni-style trolley.

The irony, however, is that Arlington County has continued lavishing spending on North Arlington, especially on the glittering neighborhoods along the Orange Line. Some $55 million was spent to install three new elevators at the Metro entrance at Rosslyn and nearly $2 million went to renovate a dog park at Clarendon. Billions of dollars more have gone into the Silver Line, which – when completed – will connect North Arlington to Dulles Airport.

But there was this fierce opposition to the Columbia Pike Streetcar, whose costs have escalated – due to the years of delays – to around $300 million with about one-third of the money coming from the state and much of the rest picked up by special taxes on businesses that would benefit from the improved transit.

Though the state money would presumably be lost if the Streetcar is killed, North Arlington residents may well be eying other parts of the funding for more improvements to the Orange and Silver lines. So, some of the opposition can be explained as simply the richer, more powerful part of Arlington County grabbing money away from the poorer, weaker part of the county. But there is the troubling back story of Arlington’s history of slavery and segregation.

Understanding Arlington

Arlington County, which was originally the southwest corner of Washington D.C. that spilled across the Potomac into Virginia, was ceded back to the Commonwealth in 1846. Then, the land was home to slaveholding plantations, particularly in South Arlington, the less hilly and less forested part of the county. One of those plantations belonged to Gen. Robert E. Lee.

After Virginia joined the Confederacy in 1861 and Lee deserted the U.S. Army to command Confederate forces, his plantation was seized, with part of it becoming a cemetery for Union troops killed in the Civil War, what is now known as Arlington Cemetery.

After President Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation on Jan. 1, 1863, the former Lee plantation also became home to freed slaves, both his and others who flocked northward arriving via Columbia Pike.

Thousands of ex-slaves were settled in a large refugee camp known as Freedman’s Village along Columbia Pike (near the current site of the Air Force Memorial and the Pentagon). Freedman’s Village remained there for decades after the Civil War, finally closed in 1900. But many of the African-Americans stayed in the area, some settling in South Arlington’s historic black neighborhoods.

However, after Reconstruction ended, Arlington County like the rest of Virginia and the Old Confederacy continued to persecute African-Americans while honoring the legacy of the pro-slavery secessionists. In the 1920s, at the height of the Jim Crow era when blacks were being lynched and terrorized, a stretch of Route One through South Arlington was named in honor of Confederate President Jefferson Davis who wanted to keep African-Americans in slavery for perpetuity. The highway skirted several black neighborhoods.

Around the two world wars as the number of U.S. government bureaucrats increased, many settled in newly developed neighborhoods in North Arlington, which were largely off limits to blacks. So, when the era of segregation ended in the 1960s, Arlington – like many Southern communities – was divided largely along racial lines. That was the time frame when I first arrived, having grown up in New England and moving from Providence, Rhode Island.

More Imbalance

In the 1970s, despite Arlington’s racial divisions and wealth disparities, the truth was that the main commercial thoroughfares through the two parts of the county — Wilson Boulevard in North Arlington and Columbia Pike in South Arlington – were both dumpy and depressing.

But that was about to change. The massive public investments in the Orange Line transformed Wilson Boulevard into a glittering showplace, a hotspot for young, mostly white professionals. Yet, Columbia Pike remained pretty much the same, an eyesore of strip malls, car congestion and slow-moving buses servicing a racially diverse population, now with many Latinos and Asians as well as blacks and whites.

Indeed, the shameful reality of Arlington County was that the gap between predominantly white North Arlington and racially diverse South Arlington actually grew wider after segregation ended in the 1960s, rather than narrowing.

To add injury to this insult, the people of South Arlington ended up subsidizing wealthier North Arlington because much of the money for the Metro system comes from a gas surtax that falls most heavily on people who rely on their cars for transportation, i.e., people with inferior public transit. There’s also the financial benefit for North Arlington families who can get by with one or no car and thus save more money.

Yet, Tea Party-style politicians have learned that — whatever the reality — they can exploit the Old Confederacy’s subterranean racial divisions for political gain. As we’ve seen in Arlington County, the strategy works not only in the rural Deep South but in relatively sophisticated communities in Northern Virginia.

And, as for Jefferson Davis Highway – honoring a dyed-in-the-wool white supremacist – I did urge the County Board to appeal to the Republican-controlled Virginia legislature to end this vestige of racial bigotry. My proposal drew mostly derisive attention from the local media and hate mail from one resident of North Arlington who wrote: “I am very proud of my Commonwealth’s history, but not of the current times, as I’m sure many others are.” [See Consortiumnews.com’s “Shameful History of Jeff Davis Highway.”]

That minor public furor caused a senior elected Democrat to approach me at a public meeting and urge me to back off the Jefferson Davis proposal for fear of complicating Arlington County’s relations with the politicians in the state capital of Richmond. The county official told me that the notion of removing Jefferson Davis’s name would be viewed as crazy by many state legislators.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS | The Republican Senate Will Love Loretta Lynch Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=7118"><span class="small">Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Sunday, 09 November 2014 11:55

Gibson writes: "President Obama’s nomination of Loretta Lynch as Eric Holder’s replacement is all the proof we need that the banks truly own Washington, that nobody in the Department of Justice will ever bring justice to the bankers behind the financial meltdown, and that the revolving door keeps on spinning."

Loretta Lynch, Obama's nominee to replace outgoing attorney general Eric Holder. (photo: Reuters/Lucas Jackson)
Loretta Lynch, Obama's nominee to replace outgoing attorney general Eric Holder. (photo: Reuters/Lucas Jackson)


The Republican Senate Will Love Loretta Lynch

By Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News

09 November 14

 

fter the news broke of Eric Holder’s departure from the DOJ, I called on President Obama to nominate Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood, based on his exemplary record of defending consumers and citizens from predatory banks, big oil, insurance companies, and the pharmaceutical industry. My more cynical readers commented that Obama was too much of a corporatist to nominate Hood, and that whoever Holder’s successor would be, they would be completely subservient to the banks. And after the news of Lynch’s nomination and looking into her past, I can say with confidence that those readers were right.

Right after graduating from law school, Lynch went to work as a litigation assistant for the prestigious New York-based law firm Cahill Gordon & Reindel between 1984 and 1990. CG&R attorneys represented some of the more notorious figures behind the Savings and Loan Scandal of the 1980s and 1990s, including a man who had personal dealings with Charles Keating. In its profile of Lynch, the DOJ’s own website describes her as someone with extensive experience in “white collar criminal defense.” It’s very likely that Lynch went from Harvard straight to defending some of the worst financial criminals the country had ever seen at the time. On CG&R’s website, the “securities litigation and white collar defense” section describes the kind of crooks the firm defends:

Recent matters include the alleged manipulation of the US Dollar London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and multi-billion dollar federal and state court class and individual actions involving subprime and structured finance products.… We have handled some of the most significant investigations arising from existing and emerging regulation in the white collar arena, including for some of the largest transnational companies and banks as well as the largest securities rating agency.… Our securities litigation and white collar defense practice is top-ranked by Chambers USA, The Legal 500 and Benchmark Litigation.

Lynch basically got her first six years of white collar criminal defense experience working at the firm that is currently responsible for keeping the bankers behind the great subprime mortgage grift out of jail. CG&R is also defending the financial institutions that jacked up interest rates on everything from student loans to home loans out of greedy self-interest. They even defended the agencies that knowingly rated worthless mortgage-backed securities as AAA, setting up millions to lose their retirement savings in a snap.

After six years of exemplary work at this soulless law firm, Lynch walked through the revolving door to the U.S. Attorney’s office in the Eastern district of New York, which plays a major part in investigating financial crimes. She gradually worked her way up the ladder, going from an assistant U.S. attorney in 1990 to becoming the unit’s Deputy Chief of General Crimes in 1993. She was chief of the office’s Long Island division by 1998, and was tapped as U.S. Attorney by June of 1999, where she remained until 2001. Then, Lynch walked back through the revolving door to return to defending the worst of America’s worst corporate criminals.

Lynch couldn’t wait to get started at the Hogan & Hartson law firm (now known as Hogan Lovells). Interestingly enough, Lynch was a partner at Hogan, working alongside John Roberts, the current chief justice of what is the most corporate-friendly Supreme Court in decades. Hogan’s website doesn’t list its past clients, but you can get a pretty good idea by visiting the site’s “financial institutions” section:

We represent banks, brokers, insurers, asset managers, investment funds, regulators, and other market participants, large and small, on the full range of legal services. This includes corporate, competition, employment, finance, IT, intellectual property, litigation, pensions, real estate and tax.

As soon as Lynch joined Hogan in 2002, she interrupted her own vacation, came to the office without pay and immediately got to work defending an Arthur Andersen partner who had helped cook the books for Enron. From 2003 to 2005, Lynch sat on the board of the New York Federal Reserve, working directly under future U.S. Treasury secretary Tim Geithner. The New York Fed has been widely documented for its incestuous relationships with the big Wall Street banks it’s supposed to regulate. The revolving door spun once again in 2010, when President Obama appointed Lynch to her old job as U.S. Attorney of New York’s Eastern District.

Drawing on her past experience of standing up for white collar crooks, Lynch has spent the last four years treating big banks with kid gloves. Under Lynch’s oversight, the U.S. government allowed HSBC to pay a fine that amounted to five weeks of profit for the bank after they admitted to laundering $800 million for Mexican drug cartels. Lynch was also responsible for Citibank paying a $7 billion settlement-- $3.8 billion of which was later billed to U.S. taxpayers – rather than going to jail over misleading millions of investors about mortgage-backed securities that were doomed to fail.

There’s really no question about whether or not Lynch will survive her senate confirmation hearing. Senator Dick Durbin once referred to his chamber as overly subservient to the big banks, saying, “They own the place.” Bankers everywhere can breathe a sigh of relief knowing that the president’s pick for the nation’s top lawyer won’t try to put any of them in jail. The senators they sponsored in the last election cycle will likely confirm her with haste.



Carl Gibson, 27, is co-founder of US Uncut, a nonviolent grassroots movement that mobilized thousands to protest corporate tax dodging and budget cuts in the months leading up to Occupy Wall Street. Carl and other US Uncut activists are featured in the documentary We're Not Broke, which premiered at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival. Carl is also the author of How to Oust a Congressman, an instructional manual on getting rid of corrupt members of Congress and state legislatures based on his experience in the 2012 elections in New Hampshire. He lives in Sacramento, California.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Obama Urged to Work Closely With People Suing Him Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=9160"><span class="small">Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker</span></a>   
Sunday, 09 November 2014 09:23

Borowitz writes: "President Obama is under increasing pressure to work closely and coöperatively with a group of people who are suing him in federal court, the people suing him confirmed today."

John Boehner and Mitch McConnell. (photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)
John Boehner and Mitch McConnell. (photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)


Obama Urged to Work Closely With People Suing Him

By Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker

09 November 14

 

The article below is satire. Andy Borowitz is an American comedian and New York Times-bestselling author who satirizes the news for his column, "The Borowitz Report."

resident Obama is under increasing pressure to work closely and coöperatively with a group of people who are suing him in federal court, the people suing him confirmed today.

“Over the past six years, President Obama has been stubborn, arrogant, and oppositional,” John Boehner, the Republican Speaker of the House, said. “His refusal to work with people who are suing him is just the latest example.”

Republican Senator Mitch McConnell, of Kentucky, echoed the Speaker’s criticism, adding, “Time and time again, the President has refused to pick up the phone and talk to me, despite my saying that I was doing everything in my power to make him a one-term President.”

Other members of the G.O.P. caucus blasted the President for being aloof and frosty to Republicans who had questioned his American citizenship, the authenticity of his birth certificate, and the legitimacy of his Presidency. “That’s no way to get things done,” Senator James Inhofe, of Oklahoma, said. “He’s got a real attitude.”

Boehner concluded his comments, however, with an olive branch of sorts for Obama. “Mr. President, we Republicans are eager to sit across the table from you and get to work for the American people,” he said. “Otherwise, get ready to be impeached.”


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Low Bridge: The Lingering Death of Health Care Reform Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=11104"><span class="small">Charles Pierce, Esquire</span></a>   
Sunday, 09 November 2014 09:13

Pierce writes: "On Tuesday, there was something of an ideological shift in our politics. You may have noticed. Then, yesterday, a federal circuit court of appeals pretty much shoved the question of marriage equality in the direction of the Supreme Court."

 (photo: Getty Images)
(photo: Getty Images)


Low Bridge: The Lingering Death of Health Care Reform

By Charles Pierce, Esquire

09 November 14

 

our Special Bonus Afternoon Dooley: "No matther whether th' constitution follows th' flag or not, th' Supreme Coort follows th' illiction returns."

-- Finley Peter Dunne, 1901

And so they have.

On Tuesday, there was something of an ideological shift in our politics. You may have noticed. Then, yesterday, a federal circuit court of appeals pretty much shoved the question of marriage equality in the direction of the Supreme Court. And then, today, the Supreme Court accepted review of King v. Burwell, the completely preposterous ruling in which the D.C. Court of Appeals said that the people who drafted the law didn't mean what they clearly meant.

The challengers say the provision means that only people in states with their own exchanges can get subsidies. Congress made the distinction, they say, to encourage states to participate. But the Internal Revenue Service has issued a regulation saying subsidies are allowed whether the exchange is run by a state or by the federal government. The challengers say that regulation is at odds with the law. In response, Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr. told the justices that the I.R.S. interpretation was correct. The one offered by the challengers, he said, is "contrary to the act's text and structure and would render the act unrecognizable to the Congress that passed it."

Jonathan Chait is the one who established the meme. He resorted to illustrating it with the famous Seinfeld episode in which George Costanza insists that the Moops invaded Spain in the 8th Century because that's what it says on the card. The argument that the Moops invaded your doctor's office is now as deadly serious in reality as it is ridiculous on its face. The Nine Wise Souls wouldn't have been able to take this case if there already weren't four votes to do so, which means that at least four of them think El Cid got strapped to his horse to fight against the invading Moops. That likely leaves the deciding vote to Chief Justice John Roberts, who upheld the law the last time it came before him, but did so in a way that allowed various inhumane Republican governors to reject the FREE MONEY (!) available under the expansion of the Medicaid program. Several governors then saved our freedom by arranging the illness of various poor people in their states. Roberts let that happen. Now, the fate of the law itself sits in his lap. I am not optimistic.

There is no question of there having been a long game played against this law within the political culture. Most of the attention was paid to the numerous futile attempts by the House of Representatives to repeal the law entirely. But the real campaign was to set up a context within which the law could be so cored out of its essential elements that it would fall of its own weight. In his insufferable cock-a-doodle-doo of triumph in today's Washington Post, Charles Krauthammer was admirably frank about what the strategy was, and what it should be going forward, now that the Republicans control the national legislature.

As for Obamacare, a symbolic abolition that Obama will immediately veto is less important than multiple rapid-fire measures to kill it with a thousand cuts. Repeal of the medical device tax. Repeal of the individual mandate. Repeal of the employer mandate. Repeal of the coverage mandate, thereby reinstating Obama's broken promise that "If you like your health-care plan, you can keep it." And repeal the federal bailout for insurers on the Obamacare exchanges.

And the federal courts were always the essential fail-safe mechanism for this extended scheme. And now they've come into play. Roberts gave the law a reprieve, but he did so by slipping it a slow acting poison which people like "Bobby" Jindal and Rick Perry were more than happy to administer to their more politically insignificant constituents. The ramifications of a ruling against the administration and the ACA are too brutally comical to contemplate -- a significant percentage of 4.7 million people would lose their insurance because they lost their subsidies, and then they would be subject to fines because they don't have insurance. (Of course, the IRS under this president could decline to collect the fines, but the Republicans would scream bloody murder, reopen their fantastical conspiracy theories about the Obama IRS, and likely sue.) This was already a pretty terrible week. It just got worse. Sociopathy gets its day in court, riding on the backs of the Moops.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 2661 2662 2663 2664 2665 2666 2667 2668 2669 2670 Next > End >>

Page 2661 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN