RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
FOCUS: Bashing Blacks, Latinos, Jews, and Muslims: Never Again! Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=5494"><span class="small">Steve Weissman, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Tuesday, 01 September 2015 11:20

Weissman writes: "Donald Trump astounds the world with his casual American racism, while far-right and neo-fascist movements across Europe grow strong by hating others for their skin color, religious origin, or immigrant status. From the police and prosecutorial lynching of American blacks to Europe's increasingly barbaric treatment of refugees, the specifics differ. But hatred is catching, and the destructive forces on one side of the Atlantic will inevitably reinforce those on the other."

Donald Trump. (photo: Getty Images)
Donald Trump. (photo: Getty Images)


Bashing Blacks, Latinos, Jews, and Muslims: Never Again!

By Steve Weissman, Reader Supported News

01 September 15

 

onald Trump astounds the world with his casual American racism, while far-right and neo-fascist movements across Europe grow strong by hating others for their skin color, religious origin, or immigrant status. From the police and prosecutorial lynching of American blacks to Europe’s increasingly barbaric treatment of refugees, the specifics differ. But hatred is catching, and the destructive forces on one side of the Atlantic will inevitably reinforce those on the other.

Why inevitably? Think of the precedents.

Adolph Hitler greatly admired America’s “wholesome aversion for the Negroes” and was “passionately interested in the Ku Klux Klan.” The American car-maker Henry Ford published propaganda against “The International Jew” and openly supported the Nazis, as does the never-say-die octogenarian Willis Carto, who continues to teach that “Hitler’s defeat was the defeat of Europe. And of America.”

Carto is “undoubtedly the central figure in the post-World War II American far right” and he makes no bones about blaming Hitler’s defeat on “the Jew-Zionist international bankers’ conspiracy.” He spread this message in his widely circulated hate-sheet “The Spotlight,” backed the segregationist White Citizens Councils to fight against “the inevitable niggerification of America,” and created the Institute for Historical Review (IHR), which spread its Holocaust denial to Europe and the Middle East.

Bringing all this hate together, Carto organized the Liberty Lobby, “a big tent” for everyone on the far right, from Ku Klux Klansman David Duke to the libertarian Ron Paul, who used the lobby’s mailing list to sell subscriptions to his own racist newsletters.

The Donald may be one hell of a salesman, and he can draw on centuries of slavery, racial segregation, imperial wars, and the genocide of the Native Americans. But, like chickens coming home to roost, the arguments articulated by Willis Carto and his acolytes are now being parroted by the neo-Nazis, white nationalists, and Christian Identity activists applauding Trump’s racist provocations.

“I don’t think Trump is a white nationalist,” one of them told the New Yorker’s Evan Osnos. Nor is the loud-mouth candidate an ideological fascist, at least not yet. But, said his admirer, Trump reflected “an unconscious vision that white people have – that their grandchildren might be a hated minority in their own country. I think that scares us. They probably aren’t able to articulate it; I think it’s there. I think that, to a great degree, explains the Trump phenomenon. I think he is the only person who can tap into it.”

Both in the US and Europe, this tapping into nativist resentment, white and Christian nationalism, xenophobic intolerance, and racist hatred is already having catastrophic consequences, which will almost certainly get worse. The only thing that can stop it is if decent people drive a stake into its heart. But how?  

This is the big question we need to put directly to Senator Bernie Sanders, who is challenging Hillary Clinton for the Democratic presidential nomination (See here and here). Bernie is primarily fighting for greater economic and social equality with pragmatic programs that extend FDR’s New Deal. This is not a bad place to begin, since growing inequality only feeds the far-right and neo-Nazis. But he needs to explicitly target the hateful bashing of “outsiders” that these movements make their central organizing principal. 

With help from Cornel West and disruptive pressure from Black Lives Matter, Sanders is belatedly making racially specific issues part of his campaign.  But, like most old-fashioned socialists of whatever school, he still appears to view racism primarily as a symptom of economic causes to be cured by class-based economic solutions.

Class counts, to be sure, and economics determines much of the world in which we live. But, to borrow from the title of Brother Cornel’s master work, twenty-first century socialists have to understand that Race Matters. As he wrote in the preface to his 2001 edition, “Black people in the United States differ from all other modern people owing to the unprecedented levels of unregulated and unrestrained violence directed at them.” The violence continues without let-up, which is why the Sanders campaign has to make a priority of working with blacks, whites, and everyone else to stop it.

Sanders and those of us who support him must similarly make an all-out effort to stop the prejudice that Trump displays against Mexicans and other Latinos. As in the 1960s, when Bernie led pickets and sit-ins at the University of Chicago as campus president of the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), white supremacy remains a defining issue of American life.

But this is just the start. The really tough issue for Sanders goes beyond race and the color line. If he is to help stifle the far-right and neo-fascist onslaught, he needs to make more explicit his opposition to the organized violence and hatred against Muslims. Wanting to focus on common-sense domestic programs, he has shied away from foreign policy except to answer questions and remind voters that he voted against both Iraq wars, while Hillary voted for the war in 2003. He now says he will spend more time on foreign policy, but his silence so far has weakened any systematic criticism of what my colleague William Boardman calls “America’s 14 years of continuous war in the Middle East and Africa.”

Bernie’s “critical but supportive posture on Israel,” in the words of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA), similarly weakens any outspoken condemnation of Muslim-bashing, which now rivals Jew-bashing as a motivating force for the far-right and neo-fascists, especially in Europe. As Willis Carto’s American Free Press headlined an article on Marine Le Pen, the “National Front finds being ‘anti-Muslim’ better for business than being ‘anti-Semitic.’”

Speaking at a town hall in Cabot, Vermont, during last summer’s Gaza war, Bernie posed some tough questions for himself: “Has Israel over-reacted? Have they bombed U.N. facilities? The answer is yes, and that is terribly, terribly wrong,” he said.

“On the other hand – and there is another hand – you have a situation where Hamas is sending missiles into Israel – a fact – and you know where some of those missiles are coming from. They’re coming from populated areas; that’s a fact. Hamas is using money that came into Gaza for construction purposes – and God knows they need roads and all the things that they need – and used some of that money to build these very sophisticated tunnels into Israel for military purposes.”

According to JTA, hecklers interrupted, some shouting epithets.

“Excuse me, shut up, you don’t have the microphone,” Sanders said. “You asked the question, I’m answering it. This is called democracy. I am answering a question and I do not want to be disturbed.”

Sanders was right, there is always another hand, and as “an old Jew” (his term), he knows with which hand he identifies. This is his personal stance. The question is whether he can get beyond it for the greater good.

Those of us who have long supported an independent State of Palestine need to answer the same question. Largely because of the work of Willis Carto and his ideological stormtroopers, too many Palestinians and their supporters have bought into Holocaust denial and repeated the lies of “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.”

Why have so many of us remained silent about this for so long? Mostly because we did not want to create an added burden for the underdogs. But we did our Palestinian comrades no favor, and we played into the hands of the neo-Nazis. If we are going to ask Bernie Sanders to help lead the fight against Muslim-bashing, we have to ask the Palestinians, the Egyptians, the Iranians and so many others to stop their Jew-bashing. Together, we all have to say, “Never again!” This is the only way we can begin to defeat the hatred into which Donald Trump and Marine Le Pen are tapping.



A veteran of the Berkeley Free Speech Movement and the New Left monthly Ramparts, Steve Weissman lived for many years in London, working as a magazine writer and television producer. He now lives and works in France, where he is researching a new book, “Big Money and the Corporate State: How Global Banks, Corporations, and Speculators Rule and How to Nonviolently Break Their Hold.”

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: High Drug Prices Are Killing Americans Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=15102"><span class="small">Bernie Sanders, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Tuesday, 01 September 2015 10:24

Sanders writes: "Americans should not have to live in fear that they will go bankrupt if they get sick. People should not have to go without the medication they need just because their elected officials aren't willing to challenge the drug lobby."

Bernie Sanders. (photo: Randy L. Rasmussen/The Oregonian)
Bernie Sanders. (photo: Randy L. Rasmussen/The Oregonian)


High Drug Prices Are Killing Americans

By Bernie Sanders, Reader Supported News

01 September 15

 

ll across the country, Americans are finding that the prices of the prescription drugs they need are soaring. Tragically, doctors tell us that many of their patients can no longer afford their medicine. As a result, some get sicker. Others die.

A new Kaiser Health poll shows that most Americans think prescription drug costs in this country are unreasonable, and that drug companies put profits before people. Want to know something? They're right.

Americans pay the highest prices for prescription drugs in the world -- by far. Drug costs increased 12.6 percent last year, more than double the rise in overall medical costs. (Inflation in this country was 0.8 percent that year.)

Even before that, we spent nearly 40 percent more per person on prescriptions in 2013 than they did in Canada, the next most expensive industrialized country. Prescription drugs cost nearly five times more per person in this country than they did in Denmark that year.

This is not a partisan issue. Most Americans -- Republicans, Democrats, and independents -- want Congress to do something about drug prices. 86 percent of those polled, including 82 percent of Republicans, think drug companies should be required to release information to the public on how they set their prices. Large majorities support other solutions to the drug cost problem as well.

The Kaiser poll also showed that Republican voters care more about drug prices than they do about repealing Obamacare. They should. Republicans in Congress have tried to repeal that law so many times that it's an embarrassment. It's also a distraction from the very real health care problems our country faces. Millions of Americans still can't see a doctor when they need one. Another poll showed that nearly one in five Americans didn't fill a prescription because of cost.

That should not be happening in the United States of America -- but it is. And it's not likely to end anytime soon, unless we do something. Medicare is predicting that drug costs will continue to rise by nearly 10 percent per year for the next 10 years. Tens of thousands of Americans now spend more than $100,000 a year on prescription medication. One drug costs $1,000 per pill.

None of this has happened by accident. Our drug costs are out of control because that's the way the pharmaceutical companies want it. Other countries have national health insurance like the Medicare For All plan I have proposed, and these national plans are able to negotiate better prices. In this country, however, drug lobbyists have been able to block Medicare from negotiating better prices on behalf of the American people.

The pharmaceutical industry is also riddled with fraud. As a result, the American people are ripped off to the tune of billions of dollars per year. Virtually every major pharmaceutical company in this country has either been convicted of fraud or has reached a fraud settlement. Offenses include price manipulation, kickbacks, and substandard manufacturing practices.

Between our government's unwillingness to negotiate prices and its failure to effectively fight fraud, it's no wonder drug prices are out of control. We need to do more.

Here are some of the common-sense measures I will fight to see enacted into law:

Congress should instruct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to negotiate drug prices with the pharmaceutical companies on behalf of Medicare. We should use our buying power to get better deals for the American people. Other countries do it; why aren't we?

We should penalize drug companies that commit fraud. They seem to feel the same way big banks do: that paying fines and settlements is simply part of the cost of doing business. That needs to change. We should pass legislation which says that drug companies lose their government-backed monopoly on a drug if they are found guilty of fraud in the manufacture or sale of that drug.

We should end "pay for delay." That's the collusion which takes place between drug companies when the holder of a brand-name patent pays another drug company to hold off on manufacturing a generic substitute. Brand-name drugs cost ten times as much as generics, on average, and can cost as much as 33 times as much.

We should also demand transparency from drug companies, who have been concealing the true cost of their research and development while at the same time taking tax breaks for it and using biased figures as an excuse for price gouging.

We should also make it easier to import lower-cost drugs from other countries. Years ago, I was the first member of Congress to take Americans across the border to Canada to purchase drugs at a fraction of the cost they were paying in the United States. They were able to buy breast cancer medication at far, far lower prices than what they were paying in our country. Americans should be able to do this online or by mail, provided they have the proper prescription from a physician.

Americans should not have to live in fear that they will go bankrupt if they get sick. People should not have to go without the medication they need just because their elected officials aren't willing to challenge the drug lobby. The public is fed up, and they have a right to be fed up. It is time we joined the rest of the industrialized world -- not only by enacting a national health care program, but by implementing prescription-drug policies that work for everybody, not just the CEOs of the pharmaceutical industry.



Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The Government's Hypocrisy on Hacked Information Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=36478"><span class="small">John Kiriakou, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Tuesday, 01 September 2015 08:11

Kiriakou writes: "If the government is going to be consistent, it can do two things, in my view. It can either drop all of these witch-hunt investigations into federal employees with Ashley Madison accounts right now, or it can release from prison immediately a federal inmate named Barrett Brown."

John Kiriakou in the documentary Silenced. (photo: AFI Docs)
John Kiriakou in the documentary Silenced. (photo: AFI Docs)


The Government's Hypocrisy on Hacked Information

By John Kiriakou, Reader Supported News

01 September 15

 

ike many Americans, I’ve been amused over the past couple of weeks by news of the Ashley Madison hack. I frankly don’t care if I know anybody who had signed up on the adultery website, and I’ve not looked at any of the several websites that claim to allow people to be able to search the site’s members. It’s none of my business who is cheating on his or her spouse, it doesn’t affect me in any way, and I have more important things to worry about.

One thing does bother me, though. It actually bothers me very much. And that is the government’s hypocrisy when it comes to hacked information. Legally, hacked information is stolen property. I was working on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee staff when Chelsea Manning leaked thousands of classified cables to Wikileaks. Within days, Senate staffers received instructions that we were not to access Wikileaks from a Senate computer. The information had been stolen, our security officers said, so we were to leave it alone. Don’t search it, read it, or even look at it.

Indeed, when State Department whistleblower Peter van Buren wrote a post on his personal blog that included a link to a document on Wikileaks, the State Department sought to have him prosecuted. Van Buren was also stripped of his security clearance and banned from State Department headquarters. The State Department investigators’ case was simply that the Wikileaks information was stolen, and so Van Buren had committed a crime. (He was finally vindicated and allowed to retire.)

So why is the Ashley Madison information being treated differently? For example, Fox News reported that Defense Secretary Ashton Carter “confirmed the Pentagon was looking into the list of people who used military email addresses.” Carter went on to say that “the [uniformed] services are looking into it [Pentagon employees using Ashley Madison] as well they should be.” It seems to me that what the secretary is suggesting is that his investigators are in possession of stolen property and that they are using it freely. That’s a crime.

Similarly, investigators at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) are questioning employees who signed up for Ashley Madison using a DHS email. That was a stupid thing to do, certainly, but DHS investigators don’t have any legal right to even look at the hacked Ashley Madison data, let alone to use it in an investigation. Again, possession of stolen property is a crime.

A friend of mine is a security investigator in a major federal department. She told me last week that her department’s leadership has ordered her to interview every employee who signed up for Ashley Madison using a department email account. This has caused her several problems. First, she acknowledges the fact that she is now in possession of stolen property. If the FBI wanted to target her, they could. (And take it from my own first-hand experience – if the FBI wants to get you, they’re going to get you.)

Second, she has found that many of the email addresses were used by people other than their owners. For example, let’s say some sap wants to create an Ashley Madison account. He has no intention of actually cheating, but he wants to peruse the listings. He’s a voyeur. So he registers on the site. When the site asks for an email address, he types one in that he saw on a business card – yours – that he may have found on the ground, on the internet, on Facebook, wherever. You’ve never heard of Ashley Madison, but now your work email is associated with it. Still, the point is that the government doesn’t have the legal right to question you about this, when the information they’re using is stolen in the first place.

If the government is going to be consistent, it can do two things, in my view. It can either drop all of these witch-hunt investigations into federal employees with Ashley Madison accounts right now, or it can release from prison immediately a federal inmate named Barrett Brown.

Never heard of Barrett Brown? Brown is a federal prisoner doing more than five years on a whole bunch of trumped-up charges. The feds accused Brown of being associated with the hacker group Anonymous. That’s not a crime, so the FBI arrested him for allegedly threatening an FBI agent in a YouTube video. I watched that video. The “threat” was akin to the Vietnam War protestor who was arrested for threatening to vomit on President Johnson. It made me want to reach out to the aggrieved FBI agent and tell him to “grow up.”

Anyway, after Brown was locked up pending trial, for the safety of the public, of course, the Justice Department added another dozen felony charges stemming from an email Brown sent with a link to data that had been hacked from the Stratfor private intelligence analysis firm. He didn’t steal the data. He just emailed a link to it. Brown ended up taking a plea offer and is currently serving 63 months in prison.

That leads us back to the intrepid investigators in the Pentagon, the Department of Homeland Security, and elsewhere. They’re breaking the law. They should stop doing that. And if they’re not going to stop doing that, the courts should toss Barrett Brown’s sentence. Of course, consistency and fairness are not something our government is known for. I won’t hold my breath.



Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

John Kiriakou is an associate fellow with the Institute for Policy Studies. He is a former CIA counterterrorism officer and a former senior investigator with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Dear White People, Laughing Is Not a Crime Print
Tuesday, 01 September 2015 08:07

Bond writes: "The wine train incident highlights how black women in the United States are perceived, treated and policed."

Members of The Sistahs on the Reading Edge book club were kicked off a Napa Valley wine train for laughing. (photo: AP)
Members of The Sistahs on the Reading Edge book club were kicked off a Napa Valley wine train for laughing. (photo: AP)


Dear White People, Laughing Is Not a Crime

By Victoria Bond, Al Jazeera America

01 September 15

 

The wine train incident highlights how black women in the United States are perceived, treated and policed

rains, once an American cultural symbol of freedom, occupy an important place in the African-American musical tradition. In the blues classic “Long Train Blues,” a man laments a lover he lost to the lure of the rails; she aims to ride the train, she explains, “till the blues wear offa me.”

Well, on Aug. 22, the blues got thrown on the 11 women (10 black and one white) of the Sistahs on the Reading Edge book club. Riding high when they boarded the Napa Valley Wine Train in Antioch, California, the Sistahs celebrated the birthday of one of their members with toasts, appetizers and good cheer — until fellow passengers took offense at the volume of the women’s laughter and they were kicked off the train. The supposed social faux pas these women committed has been pithily and profoundly summed up by the hashtag #LaughingWhileBlack.

It’s merely the latest example of black people being unable to partake in normal activities, such as asking for help or wearing a hood without being at risk of humiliation, incarceration or death. This most recent incident highlights how black women are perceived, treated and policed, first with suspicion and then with punishment that’s hugely disproportionate to their behavior.

In June, Charnesia Corley, a 21-year-old black woman from Texas, was subjected to a vaginal search during a traffic stop because a police officer thought he smelled marijuana. A Texas state trooper pulled over Sandra Bland for not signaling a lane change and then slammed her head against the ground and arrested her for expressing defiant dismay over being stopped in the first place. More broadly, in an important document produced by the African American Policy Forum, “Black Girls Matter: Pushed Out, Overpoliced and Underprotected” U.S. Department of Education data show that “while black males were suspended more than three times as often as their white counterparts, black girls were suspended six times as often.” Black girls have faced consequences ranging from criminal charges to expulsion for infractions such as writing graffiti on school property to wearing a natural hairstyle.

In the case of the train incident, Lisa Renee Johnson, a Sistahs on the Reading Edge member and an author who documented the afternoon on her Facebook page, told The Napa Valley Register that the maître d’ delivered a number of warnings to the group, threatening to eject them from the train if they did not bring their noise level down. When Johnson asked who was complaining, the maître d’ said, “Well, people’s faces are uncomfortable.” 

Perhaps some customers were not getting the experience they paid for. According to the Wine Train’s website, the outings are designed to be “a trip into the luxurious American past,” circa the early 1900s, as well as “an unparalleled memory-making journey.” Apparently a group of joyous black women compromised what was supposed to be a historical experience. Their perceived transgression — of bubbling over with black joy — offended white privilege. Then came false accusations by a wine train representative that the group engaged in “verbal and physical abuse towards other guests and staff,” adding insult to injury.

For the aggrieved white passengers, the memory of this day excursion was not going to be of the food, the wine or the loveliness of the countryside. It was going to be that they paid, as it turned out, to spend an afternoon in the company of black women free enough to laugh and talk as they pleased. And that breach of contract could not be tolerated. What was left of the trip had to be salvaged. So the train was stopped. The women, including an 80-year-old member and one with a cane, were made to deboard, but not before taking what amounted to a perp walk through six cars past the other passengers on the train. Four law enforcement officers met the group upon their exit; the women were put in vans and driven back to Napa. There, they received refunds. Every regard and courtesy was given to the uncomfortable white people. No consideration was made for the comfort of the black women.

The policing of black women’s everyday lives occurs even as they personify the values that American society upholds. A 2014 study by the National Coalition of Black Civic Participation found that black women participate in the labor force more than any other women. In 2008 and 2012, black women led all demographic groups in voter turnout. Over the last decade, while black women experienced a decline in teen pregnancy and high school dropout rates, the number of black women obtaining college degrees increased. A 2014 report by the Pew Research Center concluded that a college-educated black woman is the most likely person in the United States to read a book. Yet because of a bevy of factors such as bias and stereotyping, black women are feared and forsaken, not admired and supported. It’s no accident that black women are the most likely women in the U.S. to be murdered or raped.

We may still be riding the train toward racial equality, but black women should be excused for feeling that our blues have yet to wear away.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Nation With Crumbling Bridges and Roads Excited to Build Giant Wall Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=9160"><span class="small">Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker</span></a>   
Monday, 31 August 2015 12:26

Borowitz writes: "As the United States' bridges, roads, and other infrastructure dangerously deteriorate from decades of neglect, there is a mounting sense of urgency that it is time to build a giant wall."

A crumbing bridge. (photo: Matt York/AP)
A crumbing bridge. (photo: Matt York/AP)


Nation With Crumbling Bridges and Roads Excited to Build Giant Wall

By Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker

31 August 15

 

The article below is satire. Andy Borowitz is an American comedian and New York Times-bestselling author who satirizes the news for his column, "The Borowitz Report."

s America’s bridges, roads, and other infrastructure dangerously deteriorate from decades of neglect, there is a mounting sense of urgency that it is time to build a giant wall.

Across the U.S., whose rail system is a rickety antique plagued by deadly accidents, Americans are increasingly recognizing that building a wall with Mexico, and possibly another one with Canada, should be the country’s top priority.

Harland Dorrinson, the executive director of a Washington-based think tank called the Center for Responsible Immigration, believes that most Americans favor the building of border walls over extravagant pet projects like structurally sound freeway overpasses.

“The estimated cost of a border wall with Mexico is five billion dollars,” he said. “We could easily blow the same amount of money on infrastructure repairs and have nothing to show for it but functioning highways.”

Congress has dragged its feet on infrastructure spending in recent years, but Dorrinson senses growing support in Washington for building a giant border wall. “Even if for some reason we don’t get the Mexicans to pay for it, five billion is a steal,” he said.

While some think that America’s declining infrastructure is a national-security threat, Dorrinson strongly disagrees. “If immigrants somehow get over the wall, the condition of our bridges and roads will keep them from getting very far,” he said.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 2351 2352 2353 2354 2355 2356 2357 2358 2359 2360 Next > End >>

Page 2355 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN