Gibson writes: "But the endgame scenario of Monopoly is a lot like the endgame of capitalism that we're witnessing today - no matter how the game starts, the wealth will eventually accumulate in the hands of one player."
Gibson: 'The board game "Monopoly" was originally invented in the early 20th century to warn players of the dangers of free market capitalism.' (photo: Fiona Shields/Flickr)
The Endgame of Capitalism
03 February 13
Reader Supported News | Perspective
he board game "Monopoly" was originally invented in the early 20th century to warn players of the dangers of free market capitalism. The original title was "The Landlord Game," made to show how property owners exploit their tenants with exorbitant rent. The game eventually evolved to include rules that let players charge higher rent if they owned all the railroads or the utility companies. But the endgame scenario of Monopoly is a lot like the endgame of capitalism that we're witnessing today - no matter how the game starts, the wealth will eventually accumulate in the hands of one player, while the other players have to sell off their property to pay their debt to the owner and, eventually, lose everything they have.
The Dow recently closed above 14,000, the highest it's ever been since October of 2007. While the financial pundits on CNBC would use this figure to have us believe the economy is bouncing back better than ever, the only ones sharing in the benefit of a healthy market are the wealthy investor class and corporations that have been insulated from the effects of the recession that still continues for the rest of us. The influx of high-frequency trading that now makes up half of all trading signifies the change of using the market as a vehicle for making long-term investments to manipulating it for short-term profit.
The market's latest high numbers are due to corporations turning out record profits quarter after quarter, having grown profits by 171 percent under Obama's watch. Most of those profits have come about by companies cutting costs by shifting jobs overseas, where they can pay a Chinese worker a fraction of what they would pay an American worker to do the same job. News has also broken about Fortune 500 companies like Chevron, Bank of America, AT&T and IBM using inmate labor at private prisons, meaning they can slap a "Made in the USA" sticker on a product made by someone working for slave wages. The influx of immigrants looking for work thanks to free trade agreements like NAFTA, has led to the inevitable exploitation of immigrant labor which will continue as long as US immigration policy punishes the exploited rather than the companies exploiting them. And these record corporate profits also have right-wing governors and state legislatures to thank for union-busting right-to-work laws that really only exist as a vehicle for businesses to pay workers less money for the same work, and for Republicans to erode a major fundraising base for their opposition.
The rest of the uptick in corporate profits can be attributed to a lax tax code that allows companies to book profits made in the United States in overseas tax havens. There's an estimated $2.3 trillion in US corporate profits booked in overseas accounts. Apple alone stashes $1 billion a week in overseas accounts to dodge corporate taxes. That's equivalent to over 4 million full-time minimum-wage jobs, every week. The share of US tax revenue from corporations has gone from 6% of GDP in the 1950s to just 1% today.
The executives of these companies make out like bandits, as they use their increased profits to buy their own company's stock, which makes the stock price go up, making the stock options owned by the executives more valuable. And with dividends taxed at a much lower rate than actual work (20% vs. 35%), the tax revenue needed to keep society functioning continues to dwindle as the investor class accumulates greater wealth than ever before. The six Waltons who own Wal-Mart own as much wealth as the bottom 40% of Americans.
Some financial analysts say this market surge is just a rally, destined to drop as Congress expects to wrangle with the deficit in May, including a possible downgrade of our credit rating. But the fact is, our deficit would disappear if we had a small sales tax on all Wall Street financial transactions, taxed capital gains at the same rate as by-God-hard-work and overhauled our tax code in favor of one that would do away with the loopholes that allow big corporations to offshore their billions in American profits. However, even that could get worse, as Obama has shown willingness to talk about a territorial tax code that would effectively allow corporations to pay a 0% tax rate on their profits all over the world, including the US.
In a recent Daily Show appearance, Al Gore made a half-hearted attempt at explaining the idea of "sustainable capitalism" to Jon Stewart. But even Gore's description of capitalism as the only economic system that works sounded incredibly outdated to those of us who weren't millionaire media moguls or TV personalities. We're witnessing the endgame of capitalism, where a few wealthy individuals and corporations have accumulated most of the wealth while the rest of us are left to fight for the scraps. And it looks a lot like the endgame of Monopoly, where every player is selling off their house and foreclosing their property to pay the one player who already has everything. And when the Monopoly game has gone that far, the only thing left to do is flip the board over, scatter all of the winner's winnings, and try playing something else that everyone can enjoy.
Carl Gibson, 25, is co-founder of US Uncut, a nationwide creative direct-action movement that mobilized tens of thousands of activists against corporate tax avoidance and budget cuts in the months leading up to the Occupy Wall Street movement. Carl and other US Uncut activists are featured in the documentary "We're Not Broke," which premiered at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival. He currently lives in Old Lyme, Connecticut. You can contact Carl at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
If you buy one day and sell a week later you aren't investing you are gambling.
However, the elected Captains of our ship shirked their duty and over the past thirty years allowed Wall Street to become a casino. Short sales, high speed trading, and finally derivatives, have destroyed the stability of our finances.
Capitalism is the only system that motivates individual initiative, which is the key to success and why we have been a wealthy nation. China turned to capitalism twenty years ago and transformed their country.
Two simple steps could rebalance our entire financial system. First tax any capital gain achieved in less than six months at 50^, thus destroying high speed trading. Second, limit financial 'insurance' in the form of derivatives to ones actual exposure to loss of invested capital; rhus ending the derivative game.
Achieving these will be extremely hard since Wall Street owns most of our elected officials.
Please do not confuse them with nations, Indians had not yet developed a rigid system of property. If you couldn't defend what you claimed, it was not yours, which is as good a definition as any for "Might Makes Right", and a prettier way of saying it too!
Laziness was punished by starvation, while now it is rewarded by Welfare!
Communism is an ism with an end too, the end of nations practicing it. Or were East Germans climbing/underm ining as some sort of proto-Reality Show? And similarly, are Cubans invading America on anything that floats to practice swimming, or because Communism fucked Cuba worse than Obama did America?
China's "Progressive Communism" is more Capitalist than America currently is. And they make THEIR criminals work too!
You need to read a book. May I suggest starting with BURY MY HEART AT WOUNDED KNEE?
COMMENT: The ship has "Titanic" written in big letters on the bow and stern.... Yeah, we're all in the same boat.... Some folks are in first class and a lot of families are stuck in steerage. Some workers are doing the dirty and difficult jobs that keep the ship moving. Meanwhile, there are bums
in the fancy restaurants who are drinking champagne and making more money.
What happens when the ship hits the ice?
Some folks will get "bail outs." Others will be told to sink or swim.
"Capitalism is the only system that motivates individual initiative, which is the key to success and why we have been a wealthy nation. China turned to capitalism twenty years ago and transformed their country."
COMMENT: Yeah, they made some changes in China... Now they've got an authoritarian government - which is officially Communist and atheistic - that can provide slave labor to Wal-Mart. Guys like Mitt Romney love China.
Dick Nixon gets the credit for bringing the big corporations into China. And, of course, the Reds have invested heavily in America.
A few weeks back--Barry Obama was our lesser evil--a kind of Mitt Romney in Black-face.
Just now y'all suddenly discover that the guy is a lot more evil than 'lesser.'
And a lot more a Wall Street and Harvard man than a Black American man???
As a nation we have been living by simply printing money, and using our military to force the world to accept our money. this cannot go on forever.
Further, in the case of state pensions for college and university teachers/profes sors,(and also nurses et al) one could not be even hired without signing away one's social security!
Now the media and politicians without conscience are blaming teachers and professors for being 'greedy' etc. (after paying most of them ca. $50-70 thousand a year or less ! depending on urban/rural ares rates — way below other professions with comparable education, degrees and hours!
And the public, ready to blame anyone they can, are buying these lies.
Oh, yes, you're right with the above comments.... "Major adjustments are coming in this country." Lots of families that now consider themselves to be "middle class" will wind up trying to live on the equivalent of $18,000 or less.
Some folks will call this "progress." The workers who suffer will get blamed for their misery. This strategy is called, "Blame the victims."
EXAMPLE: Conservatives like Newt Gingrich say, "The reason that poor people get 'food stamps' is because they're too lazy to work."
In reality, many of the people who get "food stamps" have two or three jobs and they still can't earn enough to feed themselves.
The stock market is as high as it is because the Obama Administration is forcing investors to invest in the stock market!
By keeping interest rates artificially low people that would normally keep their money in CD's or regular bank accounts are losing money due to inflation so they must find places to get a higher return!
This IS PLANNED!
Ask Geithner, ask Bernanke they say it all of the time.
You want Corporations to pay heavy taxes, then they will put it in places that charge lower taxes, so don't cry when they put people to work overseas YOU TOLD THEM TO because of the Tax Code.
If you had a choice you would do it too!
YOU grow up, or smarten up. There are ways to deal with these companies that move out to avoid taxes (and it isn't by giving them a subsidity to help them move their plant out of the country). Our govt. hasn't taken any of those measures because as often as not, they have interest in the Co. that is moving! If the cost of moving outweighs the cost of contributing to our country and our economy, they'll stay here, pay their dues like all of us and pretend to be patriotic Americans instead of New World Order pirates. We have to get THEIR money out of OUR elections.
YES, don't raise their taxes so high that they can't compete!!
This is a GLOBAL economy, so either ONLY buy from local domestic companies that source NOTHING overseas or you lower taxes on corporations so they have no incentive to build plants in foreign countries.
BUT you won't do either of those things so yeah, GROW UP! OUR laws and our politicians tell them to move so they do.
Americans voted for Obama and HIS people have been running things for over 4 years and are making the policies that encourage companies to move!! WE ARE RESPONSIBLE since WE voted him in!!
Edge, you are correct about it being a golbal economy. That doesn't mean that what happens in some foreign jungle doersn't affect the people in the US. It means that what happens there affect us and what happpens here, affects them. Start thinking globally, fix the problems locally, and if you don't understand how that works, then you are stuck in the failed top down monarchist based theories of the past. Step aside, the future is entering the present.
You are so childish!
So when an American goes on vacation outside the US they need to pay our Government for protection?
WE PAY TAXES, that covers us wherever we go.
Start your own figgin business and pay the highest salaries and buy only the most expensive supplies...then don't cry when your company goes bankrupt!
You do not understand how business works...try it if you are so smart...but I bet you won't.
If someone does a job that the market will pay 50k then he gets paid 50k, not 250k...that is how life works.
You say in your last line that if someone gets a job and paid 50k, he gets that, not 250k, then that's life. A person getting 50k would not, especially early on, expect to get 250k, and he/she understands that. Your exaggerated claim or glibness is weak.
I think you miss the point. The "market" pays these sums because that is how the capitalist game is constructed, and the rules encourage it under selective conditions. Like a game of Monopoly. There is no NATURAL law that makes people rich in our system. If you want that, advocate for total chaos, a "law of the jungle" in which everyone fights to the death. Civilization is compromise whereby a set of rules are enacted to benefit the majority. It is well within our rights to enact different rules, either lesser or greater, to benefit more people.
We could change the rules, even write a constitutional amendment that says all income over $250,000/year is taxed at 91%. This was the top rate during the Eisenhour years, when the middle-class was most successful. (FDR proposed a total ceiling on all income over $21,000.00, but settled for a 94% rate duringthe war.) The point is that our economic structures must serve the people or they have no justification for existence. If you run a business that pays only minimum wages, society powes you ltitle thanks. It is like a slave being told to be thankful that he lives in a household which doesn't beat him.
WOW, nice mouth!
The COLLECTIVE WE!
RIF!!
Don't you know it's not polite to rant with bad breath?
Many Americans don't understand economics beyond what they deal with to survive and are easily fooled with propaganda and social lies like "if you work hard you'll...." "Only the rich create jobs." etc. they are distracted with terms like communism, socialism in negative conotation to support their demise under unbridled capitalism. America's economic sysstem is not Capitalist, socialist, communist. It is Democratic Capitalist that supports public and private partnership. That partnership built canals, rails, expanded territory, built the freeway system, public education and so on. Republicans have hyjacked Democratic Capitalism for unbridled cpaitalism and convinced Americans it's in their best interest. Thump on the head folks.
I do not agree with your stand.When government comes in arbitrarily without sound economic laws and good business practice all that results is chaos.It is as if they said gravity only works between 20 and 500 feet... ya I know crazy.Well the resultant activity tends to be just that,crazy.The laws of business and the rules of economy are not followed and things get all mushed up. Capitalism,Soci alism, Communism ad bla bla are poor excuses for understanding the laws of finance and money.Money is an idea backed by confidence and when it is printed at 80 to 100 billion a week there is no confidence.I do not trust the guy who asks me for a 100 dollar loan when it is seen he is 10's of thousands of dollars in debt and with no chance of paying.We must bite the bullet pay down debt make "made in USA" what people want and ensure the same occurs in other parts of the world and they adhere to same standards or we will not accept....that is a start
This is what one woman in Congress, Rep. Marjorie Holt (MD) warned in the 1970s when the one world concept was being forced fed to politicians. Only one person stood up and spoke and voted against this political plight that has, as Rep. Holt warned, taken our country to it's knees with the rest of the world - and one person will likely emerge as the leader; however, it may not be an American.
"This is what one woman in Congress, Rep. Marjorie Holt (MD) warned in the 1970s when the one world concept was being forced fed to politicians. Only one person stood up and spoke and voted against this political plight that has, as Rep. Holt warned, taken our country to it's knees with the rest of the world - and one person will likely emerge as the leader; however, it may not be an American."
Starting in the early 1970s, Dick Nixon promoted "one world." He was very successful. Nixon went to China and global capitalism developed in a big way. Ecentually, even the KGB in Russia joined the capitalist game.
Who wins in this game? Forget about nations. Most nations in today's world are odd little places that can't even feed themselves.... Some - like Haiti and Somalia - are always on the verge of chaos. Others muddle along.
The big winners in the "one world" game are the global corporations.
This is why 'Control Mandates', Rules, Regs and Laws are a CRUCIAL parallel need.
Let's be clear. It is the COMPROMISE of this part that is problematical.
'The Money'... Buys, Corrupts, over-influences the Regulators and the Regulatory Process.
WE need the Corporations for production; efficient production.
But we MUST remove ANY undue influence on the Regulatory process. Remove the Corruption, not the Golden Goose.
I think this is not as impossible as it appears.
We depend on competition to bring prices down and keep profits reasonable, but when the game is rigged to enable corporations to control and/or manipulate the market (e.g., monopoly or oligopoly), then competition fails. And without government intervention, the corporations are free to take all as in the monopoly game.
It seems to me that you and Mr. Marcus are on similar ground.
Properly regulated Capitalism, ala FDR, has been shown to promote prosperity in one of the most lucrative and long lasting "boom times" this country has ever enjoyed.
The bastardization of Properly regulated Capitalism, this "winner screws all" model of unregulated financial molestation that we witness today is, of course, not Capitalism under the Classic definition.
When we ignore banks that money launder over 800 billion dollars for no-shit, full-bore Columbian Drug Cartels, we are swimming in an ooze that has NOTHING to DO with Capitalism as formerly understood ! I'm not certain that even Lucky Luciano would enjoy the "smell" of this stuff.
And, how can one sensibly resist regulation ? An unregulated car on the freeway is a deathtrap for all. Brakes and "gas" are regulators.
Now we have stock market BUBBLE ... when it crashes (this year ..) the Dow will go under 10,000 and NASDAQ under 2000 ... guess who will sell with profit first ... not mama and papa ...
Simple game ... fast computers, low risk, simple calculus ...
Capitalism, by its very nature = private monopoly at any cost. But this isn't just a game.
We're at the edge of the inequality cliff, now, with the top 1% taking in almost 95% of all new income. There seems to be no way to fix the antitrust or trade laws quickly enough to save the 99%
from economic collapse.
My recollection of Monopoly games is that they lasted for many hours or days, until all players save one got sick of playing. Almost no one in America today is even that we're playing the monopoly game.
Sadly, we're going to have to change the rules -- higher taxation (there's nothing else)-- and if we can't do it, say hello to Great Depression II. I'd give this end-game another 4-6 years.
Play monopoly - learn that no monopoly last unless it gets government protection.
That is protection from the consumer and protection from other producers.
Everything sounds right, but in real life they have removed their real mony from our board and shores, to Havens. The winners winnings you scatter are an illusion, and fiat money, that's all?
So starting a new game we all can play, is a great idea, but where can we get non-fiat money, (Non-monopoly money) for that task?
I suppose PORC will lend USA people that, to be rid of the "Capitslist Dominos" they have long feared, in their 'Domino theory"for Nationalization Singapore HDB/Tamasak/etc and these alternative boardgames?
.
We are living in a society where fear is quite pervasive
Where we have a chain of secret and not so secret prisons
Where we have torture accepted in law
Where we have surveillance of the population
Where we have random detainment and release
and on, and on and on
But don't let this new reality hit you.
We are free... we like to tell ourselves, since we can post here... with no fear
We are free, since we can go to work on Monday morning and not worry about it
We are free... since it has not affected us
In the meantime we have increasing measures closing our borders
Don't pay attention to the man behind the curtain
You are free and you should not concern yourself
After all, since you have done nothing, you've got nothing to fear RIGHT?
The USA government to appease corporate sponsors, funds coups & attacks nations who alter or change their economic policy or raise prices. Nations, like Venezuela, that have withstood coup attempts only to find themselves in the Axis of Evil, because they choose to use profit to meet the needs of the nation & its people rather than enhance the wealth of a few individuals. Iran has been under USA sanction for 33 yrs for nationalizing its resources & overthrowing the Shah.
Why should USA care about other nations economic policy? Because neo socialism works well. Private & public enterprise coexist providing government with funds necessary to meet the needs of the nation & the people.
Capitalism creates an impoverished, illiterate, homeless indebted society where government funded by the people benefits the wealthy. Nationalization of natural resources allows governments to use profit not taxes move people out of poverty to become productive members of society.
Unless we want to live as serfs it time we use our people power to change the direction of our nation & economic policy to a system that meets the needs of the nation & all its people, not just the privileged few.
FASCISM: is a corporate/gover nment partnership where government grants special favors to some at the expense of others.
For example: When Senator Obama and the Democratic majority in the house and senate voted to give tax payer monies to select market segments and select players in the market that is fascism. Later when President Obama hires on a variety of these corporate captains to help guide him -- that is clearly fascism
Capitalism: is PRIVATE PROPERTY.
In Capitalism when a company fails Larry the liquidator sells off their assets to the highest bidder.
In capitalism there is no government bureaucrat with the tax payers check book bailing out their low friends in high places.
RSS feed for comments to this post