RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Herbert reports: "Today's downward mobility can only be reversed by a range of new choices consciously aimed at helping working Americans regain their financial footing. The goal is a fairer, more economically just and equitable America."

Even workers are falling out of the middle class. (photo: Damon Winter/NYT)
Even workers are falling out of the middle class. (photo: Damon Winter/NYT)


How We Can Bring Millions of Americans to the Middle Class?

By Bob Herbert, Reader Supported News

04 September 12

 

he United States needs to be reimagined. A recent study from the Pew Research Center tells us that in economic terms the middle class "has suffered its worst decade in modern history." It's shrinking.

With jobs scarce, wages declining and the nation's wealth concentrating ever more intensely at the top, the middle class has shrunk in size for the first time since World War II.

This is not a problem that began with the Great Recession, although the recession and its dismal aftermath have caused it to snowball. We've known for many years that despite hard work ordinary Americans have had trouble making ends meet, paying their monthly bills for food, shelter and clothing. It has become ever more difficult for families to find the funds necessary for decent childcare, and to send their children to college, and to prepare for a comfortable retirement. According to Pew, a mere 11 percent of Americans now describe themselves as very optimistic about the country's long-term economic future.

What we're experiencing is nothing less than an historic generational decline in living standards. We've obviously been doing something very wrong.

My colleagues at Demos, a nonpartisan think tank, have been researching and analyzing the economic plight of the middle class and poorer Americans for many years and have come up with a compelling blueprint for turning this disastrous situation around. It is a program that would require a tremendously heavy lift politically, a great deal of shared sacrifice among America's citizens, and a substantial financial investment in our human capital and other resources.

Try to imagine a nation in which there are good jobs for all who want and need to work; a nation in which all students who want a college education would be able to afford it; a nation in which predatory lending is prohibited and banks and other financial institutions are not permitted to charge usurious interest rates; a nation in which the middle class is once again expanding at a rapid rate and the ranks of the poor are vanishing.

Demos's comprehensive report, "Millions to the Middle: 14 Big Ideas to Build a Strong and Diverse Middle Class," not only imagines such a sanguine state of affairs, but offers us a viable route to get there.

One of the most important ideas is a guarantee of at least 16 years of schooling for boys and girls growing up at a time when some form of post-secondary credential is a virtual prerequisite for a middle-class standard of living. Demos's proposed Contract for College would transform the federal financial aid system from one that is predominantly loan-based to one that relies primarily on grants. Millions of young college graduates are now caught in a cruel vise. Not only are decent jobs very difficult to find, but the graduates are shouldering enormous student debt loads that must be repaid.

As the importance of a college education has increased dramatically over the past 30 years, public support for colleges has dropped sharply. This doesn't make sense. In response, colleges and universities have jacked up tuition and fees. Tuition at public colleges have tripled since 1980. Demos's proposal, fully implemented, would double the percentage of students from low and moderate-income families who successfully complete college.

As all Americans know, the job market in general is horrendous. What is not so widely recognized is that the nation's employment challenges go much deeper than the normal vagaries of the business cycle. Millions are without work, and many are without hope of finding employment. Millions more are underemployed, working part-time or in temporary jobs, or doing work that is substantially beneath their capabilities.

This is not a temporary cyclical downturn destined to be followed by a robust recovery. Globalization, labor-saving technological advancements and the decline of labor unions has fundamentally changed the nature of work in the United States. Without bold new initiatives the American economy will be unable to come anywhere close to creating enough decent jobs to sustain a healthy middle class and substantially reduce the number of people living in poverty.

Sixty percent of the jobs destroyed since the start of the Great Recession were middle-income positions. Most of the job growth since then has been in low-wage occupations. As the Demos report notes, "The Department of Labor projects that over the coming decade the largest job growth will be in currently low-paying occupations such as home health aides, food service workers, and retail salespeople." That is not the stuff of which the American Dream is made.

The suffering from the employment crisis in the U.S. has been immense and must be brought to an end. The Demos proposal calls for a number of new or expanded initiatives, including:

  • The establishment of a temporary 21st century version of the WPA public jobs program. That would ease the plight of those hardest hit by the employment crisis.

  • A much larger commitment to public investment in infrastructure, such as roads, rail lines, seaports and electrical transmission; and increased investments in the newest clean energy technologies, and in scientific research and development. Such investments would lead to substantial job creation and help make the U.S. far more competitive in the years and decades to come.

  • A concerted national effort to reconstitute the labor movement so that working Americans are again able to band together to halt exploitation and effectively negotiate pay raises and benefits.

This is not pie in the sky. America's proudest creation in the early post-World War II decades was its vast middle class. It did not spring spontaneously into being, like magic. The process was helped enormously by a wide range of public policy decisions that, among other things, established a highly progressive tax code, guaranteed the right of workers to join a union and bargain collectively, made massive infrastructure investments, and offered extensive public support for education, including higher education.

The decline of the middle class was also the result of public policy choices, only this time they were geared to overwhelmingly benefit the very wealthy. Today's downward mobility can only be reversed by a range of new choices consciously aimed at helping working Americans regain their financial footing. Demos's report can be an important guide to that process. The goal is a fairer, more economically just and equitable America.



Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.


 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+7 # SMoonz 2012-09-04 14:36
It wouldn't take much to get things back on track. All that is needed is something like a Bretton Woods type program or a NAWAP program to get our infrastructure taken care of which would generate jobs and prosperity. Instead what we get is something like the phony American Recovery Act which at the end of the day was a waste.
 
 
+7 # leedeegirl 2012-09-04 19:23
forget getting people INTO the middle class ... how are we going to keep people from FALLING OUT OF the middle class???
 
 
+15 # TrueAmericanPatriot 2012-09-04 19:45
How do we pull millions into the middle class?

1) Fire the teabaggers, rethugs, blue dogs, and any other DO-NOTHING CONGRESS/OBSTRU CTIONIST PARTY-OF-NO

2)Vote out around 8 repug US Senators and replace them with ones that will WORK WITH President Obama (Is Turtle McConnell (KY) up for re-election?).

3)Pass the American Jobs Act once the Party-of-No is voted out.

4)Bring back jobs from overseas and create more here in the states.

OBAMA 2012!!!!!!!!
 
 
+5 # DPM 2012-09-04 20:28
The big problem is...who will do it? The wholly owned and subsidized Left or Right? And, since the American people are so easily manipulated, by the two major parties, to fight amongst themselves, they won't band together to demand the changes that must be made.
So, SMoonz, though I agree with you, I don't hold out a lot of hope. Fortunately, I've been wrong before.
 
 
+1 # SMoonz 2012-09-05 13:53
I agree with you as well. No major party candidate would do it. The plan can be implemented but neither Obama nor Romney would propose it.
 
 
+8 # X Dane 2012-09-04 20:32
I wonder what it is going to take to start some of all the infra structure work we SORELY NEED. It is a NO BRAINER, that it would be worth it even to borrow some money to start it, if non of all the wealthy people feel compelled to invest in the country they SAY they love.

There is so much to be done, and when it gets started, It will certainly improve the economy, For it is like a stone thrown in the water. The rings keep spreading, and more and more people will do better.
 
 
-1 # RLF 2012-09-06 03:52
The only problem is...all of the construction work in this country is done by illegals undercutting the wages in what used to be jobs for college kids and undereducated adults. The left and the right like to pretend that these low paid jobs couldn't be better paid if they were done with labor that had to be competed for in a real market...not one undercut by illegals. Maybe it will change when illegal Indian programers start to take white collar jobs and turn them to crap.
 
 
+1 # dkonstruction 2012-09-06 12:48
Quoting RLF:
all of the construction work in this country is done by illegals


am waiting with baited breath for the supporting documentation for this claim....what an absurd comment.
 
 
+3 # DaveEwoldt 2012-09-04 21:58
The only way to bring more people into the middle class is to flatten the hierarchy and return the theft the Kleptocracy has been engaging in since at least the mercantilists and the beginning of the enclosure movement in Tudor England in the 1500s.

But, let's be honest here, folks. Our poor planet can't afford a growing middle class that has the sense of entitlement Americans do. Yes, people need to be responsibly contributing members of their communities. But there is a very real difference between right livelihood and jobs--even so-called green ones.

There are more interrelated concepts tied up in all this than can be expressed within the character limit of RSN comments, but relocalization, steady-state economics, and an Earth jurisprudence are a good place to start if you're really interested in systemic change that can lead to a sustainable future--which necessarily means one built on the values of ecological integrity, social justice, economic equity, and participatory democracy.

And, if anyone really thinks the corporate stooge holding the American throne today is going to help us out, I've got a bridge for sale I'd like to talk to you about. Bring small unmarked bills.
 
 
0 # RLF 2012-09-06 03:53
You forgot to include drastic population control on the entire planet to get things to a sustainable level...keep dreaming!
 
 
0 # dkonstruction 2012-09-06 12:50
Quoting RLF:
You forgot to include drastic population control on the entire planet to get things to a sustainable level...keep dreaming!


agreed, if conservative republicans would just voluntarily stop reproducing we would be well on our way to achieving your stated goal.
 
 
+5 # Rick Levy 2012-09-04 22:57
The proposed WPA, infrastructure investment, and a reinvigorated labor movement are definitely needed. But these recommendations are nothing new. The WPA idea (along with a revived CCC) has been been bandied about since the 2008 Depression. The other two solutions have been pushed but to no avail for a lot longer and as long as the rethuglicans have anything to say about it, none of them ever will.
 
 
+3 # dkonstruction 2012-09-05 06:45
While I am all in favor of renewing the calls for quality free public education (including higher education) this in an of itself will not "create jobs"

And, while, I am also in favor of a "green new deal" we should not mythologize the original new deal which in fact did not get us out of the depression (world war II did...which, i grant you was in effect a "government program").

One question that progressives/th e left have to have an answer for in all of this is how do we pay for it which gets to the issues both of the debt as well as to how money is created in our economy (currently created as debt and in reality not issued by the government "debt free". Taxing the rich so they pay their fair share as well as large cuts in defense spending gets us some of the way there but nowhere near all the way so what's the answer?

Given that all of the quantitative easing that the government has done has done virtually nothing to the value of the dollar, i think we need to propose that the government take back its power to print money (as opposed to issuing it as government debt through the private banking system) and use this to pay off the debt (which right up front will save us nearly 1/2 a trillion dollars a year in interest payments) and then either "retire" that debt so that the money is no longer in circulation (which is what would potentially cause inflation/deval ued currency) and or use it over time on a "green new deal program".
 
 
+1 # C.Gill 2012-09-05 15:04
See: http://publicbankinginstitute.org/
for information about Public Banks.
 
 
+1 # BradFromSalem 2012-09-05 07:36
Why a temporary WPA? We should always be prepared for economic downturns by having a dormant WPA ready to pick up the labor slack whenever we run into a cyclical slowdown or a near catastrophic bubble bursting. These are normal offshoots of a capitalistic economy. To not have a dormant WPA at the ready, is akin to decimating our armed services when we are not at war. We still have an on hand capability and plans at the ready to ramp up military capability at the first anti-American slur by some drunken dictator. Why shouldn't we have a WPA program that can be implemented quickly. There will always be infrastructure to fix, build, modernize; and yes, to tear down when its antiquated.

The opening of this article really piqued my interest since we do truly need to reimagine the American experiment. Establishing a permenant WPA within the Department of Labor can be a gentle first step, necessary for the present and critical to protecting and building the future.
 
 
+4 # reiverpacific 2012-09-05 09:15
I can't discuss esoteric economics with any depth of knowledge but as an Architect "Forcibly retired" by the latest depression, a large part of the solution seems to be staring us in the face (I'm continually writing to Obama as well as Merkeley and Wyden of Oregon about this IN DETAIL) and I've put it on RSN before and hate to repeat myself but.
Rework infrastructure including inter-City high-speed rail with spurs to smaller hubs. Road, Rail and Bridge structure upgrades including seismic.
Federal purchase and renovation of foreclosed and neglected buildings. Sweat-equity grants and credits as a wholly or partial down-payment to purchase these properties at realistic prices and terms as the increased work load is reflected in each region or state. Halt "Gentrification " and revitalize inner-cities and limit urban sprawl for the development of high-end 'McMansions". Prevent potential wealthy slum-lords buying foreclosed properties.
"Green" existing inner city roofs, recycling storm water run-off (the technology already exists for this with self-filtering landscape and hardscape modules) and like Germany, mandate a certain amount of solar power on any new building. Upgrade Water and Wastewater Plants using a combination of current minimal chemical and bio-graded created wetlands.
There's more but this would put a whole cross section of the middle class productive professions and trades to work, from Architects/Engi neers to construction laborers.
 
 
+2 # BradFromSalem 2012-09-05 10:10
Great plan, it is exactly what I meant when I wrote the following:

"There will always be infrastructure to fix, build, modernize; and yes, to tear down when its antiquated."
 
 
0 # dkonstruction 2012-09-05 10:25
reiverpacific, i agree completely but until we are able to clearly articulate how we are going to pay for all of this (which means we need a genuinely radical critique of the debt) we will simply be dismissed and not taken seriously.

Much more work on a "green new deal" has been done in Europe and the stuff i've seen has been calling for an investment of 1-2% of GDP (over at least a decade). That's alot of bucks. We can do it (and clearly cutting the military budget and making the rich pay their fair share is part of the solution but doesn't get us nearly close enough...partic ularly if we at the same time don't deal with the "entitlement" issues.

without offering real alternatives on how we pay for all of this we wind up being locked into the austerity paradigm that has been adopted by both parties.

The other one i would add to your great list (or perhaps its just an extension of one) is an overall expansion of public transit (including but not limited to high speed rail) which i think is also a key part of greening the economy overall.
 
 
0 # reiverpacific 2012-09-05 16:30
Quoting dkonstruction:
reiverpacific, i agree completely but until we are able to clearly articulate how we are going to pay for all of this (which means we need a genuinely radical critique of the debt) we will simply be dismissed and not taken seriously.

Much more work on a "green new deal" has been done in Europe and the stuff i've seen has been calling for an investment of 1-2% of GDP (over at least a decade). That's alot of bucks. We can do it (and clearly cutting the military budget and making the rich pay their fair share is part of the solution but doesn't get us nearly close enough...particularly if we at the same time don't deal with the "entitlement" issues.

without offering real alternatives on how we pay for all of this we wind up being locked into the austerity paradigm that has been adopted by both parties.
The other one i would add to your great list (or perhaps its just an extension of one) is an overall expansion of public transit (including but not limited to high speed rail) which i think is also a key part of greening the economy overall.

Thanks for the backup: I meant by default public transport. I have several proposals to pay for much of this, one dedicating regional bid-packages, providing COMMUNITY BANKS AND CREDIT UNIONS incentives to fund projects up to a certain amount, of which a certain percentage would go to a federal pool for larger national-scale work. No room for elaboration.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN