Gibson writes: "Any politician who bemoans the national debt, whether they be American, Greek, Spanish or otherwise, is lying to you if they blame anyone but the richest 0.001% for the state's massive debt. Because the richest 0.001% have anywhere between $21 trillion and $32 trillion stashed in overseas bank accounts simply to avoid paying their fair share of taxes."
GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney is among the super rich with money in offshore accounts. (photo: AP)
National Debt? No Such Thing
28 July 12
Reader Supported News | Perspective
magine sitting at the kitchen table, stressing out over your family's finances. Between the student loan debt, the credit card debt, the car loan, the mortgage, the phone bill, the groceries, electricity and the water, you only have so much in your bank account to cover a few of those things. To avoid defaulting on your debt or having your car repossessed, you'll either have to forgo electricity for your home, or you can simply collect the debt owed to you by your rich neighbors, all of which totals more than you would make in 10 years. Would you shut off your lights, or collect what you're owed and settle all of your debt?
Any politician who bemoans the national debt, whether they be American, Greek, Spanish or otherwise, is lying to you if they blame anyone but the richest 0.001% for the country's massive debt. Because the richest 0.001% have anywhere between $21 trillion and $32 trillion stashed in overseas bank accounts simply to avoid paying their fair share of taxes. It's a number that's simply beyond comprehension. Even if someone had spent a million dollars a day since Jesus was born, they would have only spent $700 billion by today, just $0.7 trillion.
$32 trillion is a hell of a lot of money. In fact, it's more than double the United States' total accumulated debt. In fact, $32 trillion would be enough to settle both the debt of the United States and the European Union combined. Visualized in cash, the amount of money stashed overseas by the 0.001% would be almost as high as the Statue of Liberty and wider than two football fields. And thanks to the numerous loopholes, gimmicks and special deductions written into the tax code at the request of corporate lobbyists who have the ear of the chairmen of tax-writing committees worldwide, public debts and corporate profits are skyrocketing, while tax revenues and the standard of living for the other 99% of us is plummeting.
The Sundance 2012 documentary "We're Not Broke" (full disclosure: I'm in it) explains the numerous dodges that multinational corporations use to avoid taxation, like transfer-pricing and gimmicks they're still pushing for to avoid even more tax, like repatriation and territorial tax systems. Nicholas Shaxson's book "Treasure Islands" explains the history of tax dodging, going all the way back to the Vestey family's intricate financial ploys, and delves into the shady business of blind trusts. Through these underhanded means, the secret offshore economy is actually greater than the combined GDP of both the United States and Japanese economies combined. To illustrate further, the money hidden offshore by a tiny fraction of the global elite is worth more than what over 200,000,000 employed Americans and Japanese add to their economies.
Nations from the USA to Greece to Spain to Ireland are all hemorrhaging tax dollars by the billions every year into these offshore accounts. The money padding the pockets of the immensely rich could instead be used to insure that workers have a pension when they retire, that police officers and firefighters in Scranton, Pennsylvania, could be paid more than minimum wage, that public school students could have books in the classroom. Instead, these powerful corporations spend millions lobbying Congress to cut their taxes even more, which causes Congress to force austerity on the rest of us, which means the 99% has to make do with even less while the richest 0.001% makes off like bandits.
The richest 0.001% would probably argue that none of the tactics they use to dodge taxes are technically illegal, which is true. But something being legal doesn't make it morally right. Child labor was legal until people demanded it be stopped. The same could be said for apartheid, segregation, and slavery. All of these things were seen as lawful until enough people called for change.
Enough is enough. Let's demand a stop to all austerity policies until our leaders promise to end offshore tax abuse. And if they won't, let's elect leaders this November who will.
Carl Gibson, 25, is co-founder of US Uncut, a nationwide creative direct-action movement that mobilized tens of thousands of activists against corporate tax avoidance and budget cuts in the months leading up to the Occupy Wall Street movement. Carl and other US Uncut activists are featured in the documentary "We're Not Broke," which premiered at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival. He currently lives in Old Lyme, Connecticut. You can contact Carl at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it , and listen to his online radio talk show, Swag The Dog, at blogtalkradio.com/swag-the-dog.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
I am NOT prepared to concede these dodges are all "legal." I say: Show us the accounts, the deposits, the interest and prove to the public that they are all legal. Prove that they are legal under current and past tax laws, not prove that they can negotiate a settlement without having to admit guilt. Big difference.
Im not against rich people, but I am against tax dodgers...you all know that none of us would get away with this stuff. We all have to pay our fair share, it seems we are operating under 2 different systems, the one for us regular people and a whole other set of rules for the obscenely filthy rich people. They dont have to pay, but apparently we do?
Im sure they all laugh their arses off at how stupid us peons are.
The true solution for this is for the middle class and poor to stop paying taxes. It is really only government which keep the privileges of the rich secure. Why would you pay a debt to a credit card company when you discovered it was fraud. Well only because the courts will make you.
Everyone should stop paying taxes. there would be no "military industrial banking complex." No huge banks. No corporate privilege. No patents.
SHARON JONES AND THE DAP-KINGS - WHAT IF WE ALL STOPPED PAYING TAXES?
on You-Tube --- it's really great!
On October 13, 1913, an income tax bill was passed, the first since the abortive 1894 bill. It stipulated that all incomes above $3,000 would be taxed... …less than 1 percent of working people would file tax returns… …Mandatory withholding of income was reintroduced for the first time since the Civil War,...
…taxes were raised still more by the War Revenue Act of 1917. Nevertheless, as late as 1940 only 11 percent of working people were required to file, despite the huge cost of the preceding New Deal social legislation and the imposition of the Social Security Act of 1935.
…mandatory payroll deductions, permanently enacted in 1943, increased revenue income tremendously—to $45 billion in 1945, from a mere $7.4 billion in 1941 (6 times as much). Nevertheless, unlike the Civil War period when payroll deductions were introduced for the first time, mandatory payroll deductions remained in force after the end of World War II in 1945.
but alot of us in jail.
... No schools, no police, no firefighters, no roads, no traffic control on the broken down existing roads, no safety net. period. For anyone. Not children, not the elderly, no one. What a great libertarian idea.
Wait, no, noooo, it's not!
Debt is a good thing if you not the debtor but the lender.
True, but they imply protection of the small investors (hostages to the tax advantaged, rent seeking, major "investors" and speculators with other peoples' deposits). The trick will be extracting a fair share of taxes from the big guns without unduly hurting the small investors, many of whom are "savers," allowing investors to grow real productivity. To me, simply taxing the very large investment/spec ulator income, say above $250,000 a year (the lowest amount of such income being considered), or even $1 million would be a step towards letting small investors/retir ees that depend on their saving for retirement participate in the "investment" that produces real value, without letting speculators have a field day with unproductive over-speculatio n (now something like 5 times the solid investment market).
We do need, and benefit from, some smart speculation, but we absolutely need either more protection from those who gamble with too much of our seed corn, or a bigger cut of the "profits" they take such a large percentage of (especially compared to how much of our real value based money they are playing with, compared to the "innovative" notional value of derivatives that they inflate out of thin air).
The expression, "Eat the Rich," just means, let them take their turn. They've clearly been eating us a long time.
More often than not Americans vote against their own self interests. Go figure....
Don't the Tea Party idiots, and all the other blue collar peons realize that when the NRA & other Republican Liars talk them into supporting these Super Rich Tax Dodgers, by voting Republican, they are cutting the throats of every one of the other 99% ?????
You appear to have no real appreciation for everything the Average Joe paid for with sweat and blood and time. THOSE efforts laid the foundation for your financial achievements. I suspect you think your success is merely the result of your particular talent. Your smug ignorance should make you ashamed, but I'm not going to hold my breath.
Sources please for that ludicrous "50% pay no taxes" allegation -and I DON'T consider "Fix" news a credible source!
Have a bunch of Ham with yer Bourbon!
-Social Security is a tax (that disproportionat ely affects people making under $103,000 a year),
-Sales tax is a tax that disproportional tely affects people who don't earn enough to save or invest.
-Renters pay renter's taxes.
-Renters ALSO subsidize the property taxes of their landlords.
-Everyone who isn't homeless pays utility taxes.
The rich not only don't pay taxes on their foreign money, but they usually only pay taxes on income earned from working, which is a tiny portion of what they make.
We've gone over this with you at least 5 times in previous posts. This is probably why no one else bothered to answer you. RSN will probably censor my comment for calling you out on what you are: a LIAR.
Or, maybe not since I am reading your post, and I agree with you.
since i pay payroll taxes i am one of the "you" that you say pay NO taxes. Most of the others are low-income/poor people and seniors living on fixed income. So, according to you it would be "fair" to have all of those damn free-loading poor people and senior pay taxes so that? What? Corporations like GE and Verizon pay no taxes? And, what about the resent report showing that the uber rich have $21 trillion parked off shore to avoid paying taxes. But, no, i guess according to you that's fair? Stop buying into the nonsense being peddled by Fox et. al and start blaming those that are really responsible for the financial mess THEY have gotten us into. At least be honest. The vast majority of our deficit comes from two unnecessary wars and the Bush tax cuts and has nothing to do with the fact that poor people and seniors on a fixed income pay no federal income tax (there are also lots of other taxes they do pay which you also don't mention e.g., sales taxes). Here in NYC, if we only collected the millionaires tax and the stock transfer tax (which is currently collected but then immediately rebated to those that had to pay it), the state as a whole would have a $7 billion surplus instead of a $9 billion deficit. So, again, start blaming those really responsible instead of looking for scapegoats
under age 5...... 6.9% of the 2010 population
5 to 9 6.6%
10 to 14 6.8%
15 to 19 7.1%
20 to 24 7.0%
If my arguments are absurd and preposterous why do some people give me thumbs up? Regarding choosing my words: my passion chooses my words FOR me and, as a matter of fact most of my opinions WRITE ME! I find that this helps me to be free from defensiveness and instead of having to be judgemental, and giving orders :"Chooose your words more carefully" sounds ALMOST like a command! and or a kind of warning (an "or else")is implied. Surely you are more sensitive than giving commands or implicated warnings out!My writing entertains me! If others like it that is an added plus, too!
Don 't you understand that it was like this in early years of nazi Germany, fascist Italy, fascist Spain? Easy answers to difficult questions were the bread and butter for these groups, just as they are now to the Republican party in the US, and they work in the same way.
I honestly do not want to live in a country governed by the stupidest of my peers. And please don't think Romney is smart because he made money; he was interested in money because he was too dull to have an interest in anything more challenging, or subtle. He's showing his lack of sophistication to the world right now, as I sit here writing.
The "Uneducated masses" are represented by the finks and blacklegs who infiltrate the "Occupy" groups and sneak on their own kind (Like Reagan did for McCarthy in Hollywood), and the "Thugs" are the militarized cops who brutalize and put down any attempt at non-violent dissidence, making this country increasingly resemble Franco's Spain of the past.
Your imagination seems to be riding on a blind lack of observation and reasoning power!
Try some facts.
Ronald Reagan increased spending about 70% in his administration that had six years of a GOP Senate and eight years of a conservative House, but only increased tax receipts 60%. George Bush the Daddy increased government spending by 28% and tax receipts only 17%. George Bush the Inept increased spending almost 90% and tax income by less than 6%. (Figures are a comparison from first year in office to the last year.)
Your "massive spending" came from our past three right-wing buffoons and a GOP Congress that gave them what they wanted; the destruction of the middle class. And our "high unemployment" came from the 8million jobs destroyed under Inept's reign.
On the other hand, the "empty suit" now in office actually decreased spending his first year from Inept's last year while increasing income. In two years, the "empty suit" had increased government spending by $65 billion and tax receipts by $200 billion. His spending increases amount to 1.25% while Inept's increases averaged more than 11% annually. And millions of jobs have been created since Inept's policies ran their course after he office.
Really so the banksters had nothing to do with the mess we are in it's all Obama and Harry Reid? Interesting since this mess started with "W" I cannot believe how people who think like you are for real. Scary!
Here's one idea (actually 9) on how to change things:
http://readersupportednews.org/godot-video/443-occupy/12272-how-to-stop-the-empire-while-keeping-your-day-job
What he doesn't share is the top countries on the list are China, Russia, Korea, Brazil & Kuwait. I doubt if we will be taxing their citizens any time soon.
I don't like the idea of so much wealth held by so few but if they acquired it legally & kept it legally I don't see where anyone has a right to take it from them. In this country blame Congress. If we want a level playing field let them pass laws to create it. Don't let people legally earn money & then just take it & give it to those who didn't earn it.
If the money was acquired illegally or hoarded illegally take it from them & lock them up.
No matter what it isn't a valid argument to let Barry run the debt off the charts.
http://www.youtube.com/embed/VtVbUmcQSuk
Money IS debt! To repay half of that $32 trillion - presumably about the US share - would require the country to work for a year and turn all the REAL WEALTH it produces over to its creditors. In all likelihood it would be much longer because current GDP estimates include the 'value' of financial products and services, i.e. paper debt.
So... Do you really think the US is going to go without anything for a year - or even a day - to pay its debts?
To me, such figures indicate the only reason trying to get the debt paid off by getting it from the wealthy won't work is that the debt is based on too much "faith" in notional value of junk derivatives. It would be interesting, though to see what would happen if we taxed them on what they claim the junk was worth when they "sold" it to us, getting any portion (in real asset backed value) of the $21 to $32 trillion they have hoarded overseas.
The real pain comes from the drag their speculation puts on real productivity (based on the old style "INVESTMENT") by their seeking such a high percentage of any real profits (and keeping an unproductive special advantage in tax rates that should only apply to amounts small saver/investors use to provide secure retirement income.
This euphemistic "patriotism" is redefined to explain it in selfish, and ultimately, jingoistic terms.
Nothing more than the old "greed is good" since their money is necessary to "create jobs" and fuel our growth.
It is all nonsense and these "patriots" at the top know it. They swindle the world and it is their private joke. Sadly most working class schmucks believe them. The definition of "freedom" in the U.S. is only referring to extremist "free enterprise"-whi ch results in less freedom for the majority.
The only way the economy will be turned around is for the 99% to spend money on products not debt reduction. If everyone with gross incomes below $200, 000 recieved a massive influx of cash that must first be used to pay off debt & then be used to purchase durable goods such as appliances, cars, televisions etc. the entire nation would be better off not just the 1%. The previous bail outs increased unemployment, foreclosure & bankruptcy rates and poverty level while the 1%'s personal income & corporate profits increased significantly. If instead our taxes are given back to the 99% unemployment would be significantly decreased foreclosure & bankruptcy would be eliminated. The banks & other leading institution would get their money but would no longer make profits on foreclosure. Foreclosure not because of inappropriately high mortgages but due to high unemployment caused by the greed of the 1%.
There are some economist who favor this form of QE. It is only logical, & unlike trickle down it will work. Just think of what you could do with your income if your mortgage, car & credit card debt were paid. Your kids ( & you) could have new clothes, shoes, computers & supplies for the new school year. What would Xmas look like? And without going into debt. Good for you & economy.
This is clearly at odds with those super-rich that would claim their good fortune is god-given. No, their avarice is driven by greed for power and influence, otherwise they would not have to justify their hoarding of wealth in the face of morality. I personally do not believe, so I don't buy the notion that there is some penalty awaiting them and that we should leave them to it. The effects of their immorality are felt in this life, by people living now. Screw the notion of payment upon death. This world we live in can be shaped into heaven or hell by our collective deeds. The few creating heaven for themselves on Earth have made it hell for so many others. It's time to harass them, shame them, call bullshit on all their economic and political chicanery. Never let them sleep easy about it until they release their grip on the money that should flow like water through any strong economy. They are choking the life out of nations.
They've done it with money. What makes anyone think they won't do the same thing to our water supplies? They are setting themselves up to watch the rest of us fight over a dwindling pile of scraps.
Bravo!! Great reply.
The people who believed that was the true American Way had never met a liberal. They would have found out the true American Way is to work hard, earn a lot of money & then give it to a liberal who is so incredibly brilliant that he or she knows better than anyone what to do with you money.
BTW - who are the filthy rich? Easy. People who have more money than the liberal making the judgement.
Think about it, Mr. Cayman islands. A million to you is a dollar to me.It's nothing more than guiltless greed; always will be, I'm afraid.
It's really sad to be happy that it wasn't worse......but I still don't understand why we owed the taxes in the first place.
It was for the year we used the H&R Block instead of Turbo Tax....Who Knew??
RSS feed for comments to this post