RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Warren writes: "Markets work when people can evaluate the prices and risks of different products, then pick the ones that work best for them. But when the terms of the deal are hidden, competition doesn't work."

Elizabeth Warren speaks to reporters during a news conference, 05/02/12. (photo: Steven Senne/AP)
Elizabeth Warren speaks to reporters during a news conference, 05/02/12. (photo: Steven Senne/AP)



Tricks, Traps and Accountability

By Elizabeth Warren, Reader Supported News

24 July 12

 

s we mark the one year anniversary of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), I've been thinking about how for years leading up to the 2008 financial crisis, I asked students in my contract law class to read a credit card agreement - either an offer that they'd received in the mail or the actual agreement they'd signed onto - and answer some basic questions. Some were easy: When is your bill is due? Do you get points? The students always answered those.

The next questions went to the heart of the deal: Does your credit card have an arbitration clause, preventing you from suing in court if the company cheats you? No one knew. How long it would take you to pay off a $1000 purchase with interest if you paid the minimum monthly payment? They didn't know. And when I assigned that basic question as homework, almost all of them spent hours knee deep in fine print without finding an answer.

Markets work when people can evaluate the prices and risks of different products, then pick the ones that work best for them. But when the terms of the deal are hidden, competition doesn't work. And customers aren't the only ones who are hurt. If a small bank with a limited advertising budget offered a better card, no one could figure that out and switch. That had been the state of the consumer credit market for years.

Following deregulation in the 1980s, a number of big banks figured out that they could build a very profitable business based on deception - tricks and traps buried in fine print, teaser rates that hid the true costs of mortgages, and obscure terms (like double-cycle billing) than no one understood. They sold a lot of mortgages, credit cards and other loans, sometimes deliberately targeting people they knew wouldn't be able to pay in order to rake big fees off the top before they sold the loans to someone else.

Eventually the lousy mortgages crashed the economy. Families that already had been squeezed for a generation got hit from every direction. Their pensions and savings were wiped out, their friends and family members lost their jobs, and the values of their homes plummeted.

After the crash, it was clear that restoring a working consumer credit market was among the most urgent challenges. The broken consumer credit market had to be repaired by making sure that consumers had the right information and could use it effectively. That meant consolidating the bloated patchwork of ineffective agencies and regulations so that a single agency could act as a voice for consumers. It also meant leveling the playing field so that small banks and credit unions could compete for a customer's business against big banks and unlicensed lenders.

The new CFPB was designed to level the playing field for small players - families, students, seniors, community banks, credit unions, small businesses. It aimed to cut complexity out of the system, mowing down the fine print that hid bad surprises, using easy-to-read forms, and getting rid of tricky language. It aimed to let people make apples-to-apples comparisons when shopping for financial products, so people could evaluate three mortgages head-to-head or the terms of three student loan offers. The new agency was also designed to be a cop on the beat to make sure that even the biggest banks follow the law.

Not surprisingly, the Wall Street banks fought against the consumer agency, but it was passed into law because more than 200 groups and countless people came together to create real reform.

Now, one year later, the CFPB is already moving toward clearer prices and risks so consumers have the information to make good choices - with a new student financial aid shopping sheet, the prototype of a shorter credit card agreement, and rapid progress toward a new, simpler mortgage disclosure form.

The CFPB is also already helping military servicemembers better navigate the financial challenges of multiple moves and deployments and passing on targeted information to protect seniors, students, and young families about their financial options. For those who have had disputes with lenders, the CFPB's Consumer Response Center is helping to get those problems solved. The agency has hired examiners to supervise the largest banks for compliance with the law and established procedures for overseeing previously unregulated mortgage servicers and payday lenders.

And just this week, the CFPB announced that its first public enforcement action will require Capital One to refund two million consumers a total of $140 million, in addition to paying a $25 million penalty, as a result of the company's deceptive and misleading practices on credit cards.

Progress is unmistakable, but the fight over CFPB's existence continues. The big banks, their lobbyists, their friends in Congress, and even Mitt Romney have pushed for repeal of the new agency. Despite the pressure, the new agency stays focused on its mission, helping make sure that everyone - no matter how big - has to follow the same rules.

A working market needs rules, and the CFPB is starting to level the playing field. That's a good thing for consumers - and it didn't come a moment too soon.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+65 # Barbara K 2012-07-24 09:23
Thanks Ms. Warren, you go girl! I'm so glad that we have someone with your savvy to teach the young people what to look out for. Even us adults could learn a lot. The Credit Cards are always stacked in their favor. I don't have any Credit Cards, didn't like the high interest rates a couple of years ago. Hope I never again need one. I hope all possible can pay them off too. I know it's not possible for many. But once freed from that trap, you never want to go back. I'll just go without. I think Elizabeth is a breath of fresh air and will bring real honor and integrity back to the Senate.
 
 
+59 # Vardoz 2012-07-24 10:28
We hope you make it into congress and if you run for president you have our vote!!!
 
 
+12 # WestWinds 2012-07-24 15:56
And we need to support her by putting into Congress as many people like her (and Dennis Kucinich, Alan Grayson, etc.,) as we can. One of the dangers to good people is being surrounded by and drowning in corrupt people. Only progressives in Congress from now on.
 
 
+60 # Bill Clements 2012-07-24 10:21
No surprise that this is the very same person running for the Senate that Brown and his Koch brother-funded campaign donors will spend millions trying to defeat.

All that integrity and fair play is just way to much to bear.
 
 
+16 # Doubter 2012-07-24 10:36
I was just charged 13 dlls by Wells Fargo for them handling my meager SS check. I'm going to yank it out & have it deposited in a friendly credit union (assuming I can find one)as soon as I make it back to the states next month!
P.S. I'm in (Platonic) love with Elizabeth Warren.
 
 
+19 # mickeynow 2012-07-24 10:44
I wish more people would figure out the advantages of credit unions.
 
 
+28 # mickeynow 2012-07-24 10:46
Elizabeth Warren is such a troublemaker. She wants to give people a chance to properly evaluate monetary systems. Who is she to be doing this to our banksters? Keep it up, please.
 
 
+16 # maddave 2012-07-24 11:17
Not only is EW a troublemaker, she is also a smart-mouth, uppity broad who doesn't know her place . . . and I love her for that and sooo much more.

Let us remind ourselves and President Obama that one need not be a practicing attorney to serve on our Supreme Court. When the time comes---as it will---who better?
 
 
+3 # mdhome 2012-07-26 21:42
Hey, I thought having Ms, Warren as president would be heaven, BUT I think having her on the SC bench would be even better, it's a lifetime deal and not in danger of losing an election, but could she get there after all the senate hearing BS that would happen?
 
 
-12 # phantomww 2012-07-24 10:57
what! You are moving your money all by yourself without the federal govt or Warren helping you? How are you able to do that by yourself? didn't someone from the CFPB call you and tell you that paying $13 for you checking account is not good and that you can go get one that won't charge you?
You have to stop being independant and making your own decisions about where to bank. IF we all do that then what would our govt masters (oops I meant protectors) do?
 
 
+8 # Rick Levy 2012-07-24 19:06
He would never had to have moved his account to begin with if the government had been doing its job and prohibited outrageous banks to begin with. Duh.
 
 
-7 # phantomww 2012-07-25 19:54
So the govt did not go its job according to you and the remedy for this is MORE govt?
Other ex of govt failure: BP gulf oil leak while govt regulators watched porn. The remedy of libs is more govt!
I just don't understand how libs keep complaining about govt yet the answer is always more govt.
 
 
+1 # Joe Bob 2012-07-28 19:57
Bush and the Repubs made the largest gov
Bigger and Bigger, so that the bathtub they wanted to drown it in didn't exist.
 
 
+45 # Legal maven 2012-07-24 10:54
Elizabeth Warren is not only intelligent, but she has a proper orientation to social values and moral conduct, which she would bring to the senate. With public opinion of congress at an all time low, and Republicans making every effort to stop consumer legislation and healthcare for the majority of Americans, Warren's voice is absolutely essential to restore some integrity into our legislative branch of government!
 
 
+24 # angelfish 2012-07-24 11:23
THIS is what makes the ReTHUGlicans SO treacherous, treasonous and UN-American, They LIKE this kind of Fraud and Deception and, rather than addressing the problem, seek to Complicate it! Beating the drum for useless, already legislated issues like Contrception and Abortion Rights keeps people from seeing what their REAL Agenda is, which is Shahoolah-ing the American Public out of more and more of their RIGHTS! Hopefully, Elizabeth, you will be elected to the Senate and will be a formidable opponent for the Thugs to contend with. You are one of our Champions. God Bless you and strengthen you in ALL your endeavors!
 
 
+28 # BradFromSalem 2012-07-24 11:24
I am surprised that banks don't charge more fees. Every time I enter a bank or even an indoor ATM kiosk, I cost them money in lost air conditioning in the summer and lost heat in the winter. Ka-ching!
Whatever happened to I give the bank my money; they keep it safe from thieves. While they have this pile of money, they take a chunk of it and invest it. The profits from the investments pays off the costs of keeping the money safe, accounting and any other paperwork. If there is any leftover, I get a small amount of interest. Instead the banks are constantly inventing the most complicated schemes for how they manage your money.
But (future) Sen. Warren is correct, first we need to have them show us the crooked ways they are handling our money. Transparency will force us back to banking as a service instead of money laundering scheme and the we are the ones being taken to the cleaners.
 
 
+13 # WestWinds 2012-07-24 15:51
The best way to deal with the banks is not to deal with the banks. They have behaved abominably. Wells Fargo has been involved with laundering 20 billion dollars worth of Mexican drug cartel money. What more do we need to know about them? We need to get into credit unions and stop feeding the banking beasts.
 
 
+5 # ghostperson 2012-07-24 23:25
If EW doesn't win this race it is a portent sign and one that I do not want to see. Read RSN piece "The Careerist" by Chris Hedges.
 
 
+28 # amye 2012-07-24 11:49
Love Elizabeth Warren! She's an honest, smart, good, ethical, woman! Where are all the others like her? Did they all really sell out to the money and become basic street criminals? It appears so! Who really wants to deal with the criminal element on Wall Street? Enough said!
 
 
+1 # Jim Young 2012-07-26 20:12
Some have seen the light, watch Money Power and Wall Street to see many who thought their "innovations" would be used honestly and ethically. Many were surprised and dismayed at the misuse, with many of our smartest graduates leaving the street and using their considerable talents in more ethical and productive areas.

The one that stunned me? Sandy Weill, the father of the Glass-Stegall replacement with the sickening Finacial Services Modernization Act (Gramm-Leach-Bl iley) recanting yesterday. It seems a modern version of the Great Depression's top banker, Charles Mitchell (President of National City Bank which became Citibank), if it turns out that he reforms, pays at least as relatively stiff a fine as Mitchell did. Mitchell reformed his ways and went on to earn another fortune far more ethically before he died in 1955.

No one can fully repay the damage done, or the wildly inflated notional value of derivatives (John Bogle shows $741 trillion in notional value of derivatives with only $150 trillion in market capitalization. Sounds like the cost of derivatives/"in surance" is 4.9 times the cost of the real assets. I'm not into buying insurance at those rates. I hope Weill can help us return to real sustainable finance, Investment beating out the inefficient "speculation" Bogle describes in "The Clash of Cultures: Investment vs Speculation."
 
 
+11 # JSRaleigh 2012-07-24 12:12
Yeah, but Congress will find some way to thwart it by starving the beast.
 
 
+8 # Bob P 2012-07-24 13:26
So we have a huge difficult job ahead of us don't we!
 
 
+16 # tanis 2012-07-24 12:26
Ask equally intelligent, informational and humanitarian questions of E. Warren's opponent in the senate race and see if a single intelligent, truthful and humanely beneficial answer is forthcoming! This information belongs to every Massachusetts voter, can they get it thru their narrow media exposure? Vote for the candidate who will do YOU the most good, citizens!
 
 
+18 # WestWinds 2012-07-24 15:48
Elizabeth Warren may only be running for the Senate in Massachusetts, but what she has done and will do will only benefit the whole country. I'd like to see Elizabeth Warren become the first female president in 2016; we couldn't do any better. She is wonderful.
 
 
+2 # phantomww 2012-07-24 18:42
That would make her the first Native American president then. :)
 
 
+1 # Jim Young 2012-07-26 20:17
How many people know of the first Vice President with significant Native American ancestry, Charles Curtis?
 
 
+4 # BradFromSalem 2012-07-25 05:12
Please don't take offense, but we really cannot pretend these banks don't exist. A boycott of using them will only have a minimal impact when the real solution lies in strict enforcement and interpretation of the anti-trust laws for starters. Second is to outlaw fees for performing a banking service that is expected as part of the deal when I hand them my money to hold for me. Third we also need to outlaw banks and investment firms from operating under the same corporate charter, in other words reinstate Glass-Steagall.
Then, once we have a well regulated, competitive banking system lets go after the crooks and throw their asses in jail!
 
 
+1 # mdhome 2012-07-26 21:52
lets go after the crooks and throw their asses in jail!
 
 
+8 # BradFromSalem 2012-07-25 05:19
tanis,

You would be astonished the number of people here in MA that think Scott Brown is wonderful. He is master at illusion, making it look like he is bipartisan and for the regular guy, because he acts like a regular guy, and is allowed by his Republican masters to occasionally cross lines. The facts are he NEVER gets in front of any issue, NEVER. He did zero and was known as a publicity buffoon when he was in the Mass legislature.
He is anti-middle class, ant-women's rights, and a clever manipulator of the media.
 
 
+18 # doneasley 2012-07-24 13:40
Elizabeth, you deserve the vote of every Mass voter on Nov 6th. We need you in the Senate. What's amazing to me is that it's even a contest when we look at what the GOP stands for and the fact that Scott Brown is on board with every one of their initiatives.

Let's hope that Mass voters and all American voters are smart enough on election day to realize that the GOP is upside down on every issue beneficial to the American taxpayer.
 
 
+9 # Majikman 2012-07-24 15:03
The cryin' shame is that she is one of a handful. When fair play is the exception rather than the rule, the game's over, and as George Carlin used to say..."and you ain't in it".
 
 
+11 # WestWinds 2012-07-24 15:44
I can't say enough good about Elizabeth Warren. I hope and pray that she is the direction this country decides to go in. We have done worse getting ourselves tangled up with the corporate Right, now let's do much better with Elizabeth Warren!
 
 
+8 # Eliza D 2012-07-24 16:26
Thank you Ms. Warren for fighting the good fight. We need you and more people like you. I hope you are recruiting other like-minded individuals to run for office. You are one of the few Democrats I will be voting for. I'm so repelled by what passes for governance at the national level, I've gone third party. In what may be the last days of planet earth, we can no longer stand for the in-fighting,sku llduggery and outright chicanery of most of our elected officials.
 
 
+3 # John Steinsvold 2012-07-24 18:06
An Alternative to Capitalism (if the people knew about it, they would demand it)

Several decades ago, Margaret Thatcher claimed: "There is no alternative". She was referring to capitalism. Today, this negative attitude still persists.

I would like to offer an alternative to capitalism for the American people to consider. Please click on the following link. It will take you to an essay titled: "Home of the Brave?" which was published by the Athenaeum Library of Philosophy:

http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm

John Steinsvold

“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."~ Albert Einstein
 
 
+4 # Street Level 2012-07-24 19:12
I was lucky that my credit union also services my mortgage. In 2008, I knew who held my mortgage and where to find it unlike millions of less lucky souls.
But now I'm getting mailings that "the board of directors unanimously recommends that you support and vote FOR the charter change when you receive your ballot."
Yeah, a charter change to a "Savings Bank" so they can do things like "issue stock, even though they don't need the money".
Nowhere is this information on their website, it's a huge secret for "members only". Luckily, a couple members launched a Facebook and web protest and members get to vote on this.
Again though, the Credit Union sends out these elaborate color mailings and recorded phone calls, and members are paying for that. After we stop this, the next campaign should be for new board members.
 
 
+3 # ghostperson 2012-07-24 23:22
Maddave, not only don't you have to be a practicing attorney you don't have to be one at all to be on SCOTUS. There are some on the court now who despite their credential don't seem be understand their role. It is not to decide elections or to legislate from the bench. It is not to go hunting with individuals in privy to parties in huge cases before them. It is not to falsify financial disclosure forms. It is not to receive expense paid trips to retreats conducted by the primary funding source of astroturf organizations that support buying elections via Citizens United. It not to decide cases in which one's spouse is a hugely paid lobbyist for a particular position in the latter case. The Supreme Court has a lot of marsupial characteristics .
 
 
+5 # robniel 2012-07-25 05:48
Ban of America charges $25 per month to process a family member's $647 Social Secuity check and pays no interest on an "interest bearing" checking account. I'm preparing to move this account to a local senior no fee account. We do not need Bank of America or any of the other banking industry thieves.
 
 
+2 # tabonsell 2012-07-25 14:03
Find it apropos that it was Capital One that got whacked.

Had my own problems with that one a couple of years back when I noticed that I had not received a statement during the normal billing cycle. I wrote to the bank and called but to no avail. I said that I hoped they didn't purposely refrain from sending out a bill in order to have a missed payment and an excuse to charge a late-payment fee.

I was ignored and when a statement did come a month later, a late-payment fee was imposed. It took months of trying to get that fee rescinded. It eventually was rescinded but I had already cut up my card and mailed it back to the bank. My returned card and the bank's statement of rescinding the illegal fee crossed each other in the mail. I have since ignored all attempts by Capital One to again become a customer.

I have had the same problem with other banks plus the problem of having a bank hold a payment for several days in order to impose a late-payment fee.
 
 
+1 # Jim Young 2012-07-26 20:33
I was amazed when I asked which of our college students had problems with banks, unfair late fees, etc. More amazed when they all turned out to be using Capital One. We forgot to check with our son, until he called up saying he was using Capital One, and they asked him to approve a jump to 29% interest if he had a single late payment anywhere (Universal Default), apparently thinking he'd have to, since he owed them several thousand and didn't show any income as a student. We quickly paid that off and got him an account with USAA. Most students seem to suffer years of misery from their experience with Capital One. As far as we know, all their deceptive practices had been made "legal", and they didn't break the letter of the law with us, at least. They certainly seemed to take greater advantage of their customers, though, than pawn shops that other students used (at far lower interest rates). Th epawn shops seemed so much better, I'd consider using them in the future (as long as the payday lenders don't take them over and raise the rates).
 
 
+2 # 1984 2012-07-26 08:43
Ms. Warren.....pale eze get your article published in the New York Times!!
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN