Warren writes: "Markets work when people can evaluate the prices and risks of different products, then pick the ones that work best for them. But when the terms of the deal are hidden, competition doesn't work."
Elizabeth Warren speaks to reporters during a news conference, 05/02/12. (photo: Steven Senne/AP)
Tricks, Traps and Accountability
24 July 12
s we mark the one year anniversary of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), I've been thinking about how for years leading up to the 2008 financial crisis, I asked students in my contract law class to read a credit card agreement - either an offer that they'd received in the mail or the actual agreement they'd signed onto - and answer some basic questions. Some were easy: When is your bill is due? Do you get points? The students always answered those.
The next questions went to the heart of the deal: Does your credit card have an arbitration clause, preventing you from suing in court if the company cheats you? No one knew. How long it would take you to pay off a $1000 purchase with interest if you paid the minimum monthly payment? They didn't know. And when I assigned that basic question as homework, almost all of them spent hours knee deep in fine print without finding an answer.
Markets work when people can evaluate the prices and risks of different products, then pick the ones that work best for them. But when the terms of the deal are hidden, competition doesn't work. And customers aren't the only ones who are hurt. If a small bank with a limited advertising budget offered a better card, no one could figure that out and switch. That had been the state of the consumer credit market for years.
Following deregulation in the 1980s, a number of big banks figured out that they could build a very profitable business based on deception - tricks and traps buried in fine print, teaser rates that hid the true costs of mortgages, and obscure terms (like double-cycle billing) than no one understood. They sold a lot of mortgages, credit cards and other loans, sometimes deliberately targeting people they knew wouldn't be able to pay in order to rake big fees off the top before they sold the loans to someone else.
Eventually the lousy mortgages crashed the economy. Families that already had been squeezed for a generation got hit from every direction. Their pensions and savings were wiped out, their friends and family members lost their jobs, and the values of their homes plummeted.
After the crash, it was clear that restoring a working consumer credit market was among the most urgent challenges. The broken consumer credit market had to be repaired by making sure that consumers had the right information and could use it effectively. That meant consolidating the bloated patchwork of ineffective agencies and regulations so that a single agency could act as a voice for consumers. It also meant leveling the playing field so that small banks and credit unions could compete for a customer's business against big banks and unlicensed lenders.
The new CFPB was designed to level the playing field for small players - families, students, seniors, community banks, credit unions, small businesses. It aimed to cut complexity out of the system, mowing down the fine print that hid bad surprises, using easy-to-read forms, and getting rid of tricky language. It aimed to let people make apples-to-apples comparisons when shopping for financial products, so people could evaluate three mortgages head-to-head or the terms of three student loan offers. The new agency was also designed to be a cop on the beat to make sure that even the biggest banks follow the law.
Not surprisingly, the Wall Street banks fought against the consumer agency, but it was passed into law because more than 200 groups and countless people came together to create real reform.
Now, one year later, the CFPB is already moving toward clearer prices and risks so consumers have the information to make good choices - with a new student financial aid shopping sheet, the prototype of a shorter credit card agreement, and rapid progress toward a new, simpler mortgage disclosure form.
The CFPB is also already helping military servicemembers better navigate the financial challenges of multiple moves and deployments and passing on targeted information to protect seniors, students, and young families about their financial options. For those who have had disputes with lenders, the CFPB's Consumer Response Center is helping to get those problems solved. The agency has hired examiners to supervise the largest banks for compliance with the law and established procedures for overseeing previously unregulated mortgage servicers and payday lenders.
And just this week, the CFPB announced that its first public enforcement action will require Capital One to refund two million consumers a total of $140 million, in addition to paying a $25 million penalty, as a result of the company's deceptive and misleading practices on credit cards.
Progress is unmistakable, but the fight over CFPB's existence continues. The big banks, their lobbyists, their friends in Congress, and even Mitt Romney have pushed for repeal of the new agency. Despite the pressure, the new agency stays focused on its mission, helping make sure that everyone - no matter how big - has to follow the same rules.
A working market needs rules, and the CFPB is starting to level the playing field. That's a good thing for consumers - and it didn't come a moment too soon.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
All that integrity and fair play is just way to much to bear.
P.S. I'm in (Platonic) love with Elizabeth Warren.
Let us remind ourselves and President Obama that one need not be a practicing attorney to serve on our Supreme Court. When the time comes---as it will---who better?
You have to stop being independant and making your own decisions about where to bank. IF we all do that then what would our govt masters (oops I meant protectors) do?
Other ex of govt failure: BP gulf oil leak while govt regulators watched porn. The remedy of libs is more govt!
I just don't understand how libs keep complaining about govt yet the answer is always more govt.
Bigger and Bigger, so that the bathtub they wanted to drown it in didn't exist.
Whatever happened to I give the bank my money; they keep it safe from thieves. While they have this pile of money, they take a chunk of it and invest it. The profits from the investments pays off the costs of keeping the money safe, accounting and any other paperwork. If there is any leftover, I get a small amount of interest. Instead the banks are constantly inventing the most complicated schemes for how they manage your money.
But (future) Sen. Warren is correct, first we need to have them show us the crooked ways they are handling our money. Transparency will force us back to banking as a service instead of money laundering scheme and the we are the ones being taken to the cleaners.
The one that stunned me? Sandy Weill, the father of the Glass-Stegall replacement with the sickening Finacial Services Modernization Act (Gramm-Leach-Bl iley) recanting yesterday. It seems a modern version of the Great Depression's top banker, Charles Mitchell (President of National City Bank which became Citibank), if it turns out that he reforms, pays at least as relatively stiff a fine as Mitchell did. Mitchell reformed his ways and went on to earn another fortune far more ethically before he died in 1955.
No one can fully repay the damage done, or the wildly inflated notional value of derivatives (John Bogle shows $741 trillion in notional value of derivatives with only $150 trillion in market capitalization. Sounds like the cost of derivatives/"in surance" is 4.9 times the cost of the real assets. I'm not into buying insurance at those rates. I hope Weill can help us return to real sustainable finance, Investment beating out the inefficient "speculation" Bogle describes in "The Clash of Cultures: Investment vs Speculation."
Then, once we have a well regulated, competitive banking system lets go after the crooks and throw their asses in jail!
You would be astonished the number of people here in MA that think Scott Brown is wonderful. He is master at illusion, making it look like he is bipartisan and for the regular guy, because he acts like a regular guy, and is allowed by his Republican masters to occasionally cross lines. The facts are he NEVER gets in front of any issue, NEVER. He did zero and was known as a publicity buffoon when he was in the Mass legislature.
He is anti-middle class, ant-women's rights, and a clever manipulator of the media.
Let's hope that Mass voters and all American voters are smart enough on election day to realize that the GOP is upside down on every issue beneficial to the American taxpayer.
Several decades ago, Margaret Thatcher claimed: "There is no alternative". She was referring to capitalism. Today, this negative attitude still persists.
I would like to offer an alternative to capitalism for the American people to consider. Please click on the following link. It will take you to an essay titled: "Home of the Brave?" which was published by the Athenaeum Library of Philosophy:
http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm
John Steinsvold
“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."~ Albert Einstein
But now I'm getting mailings that "the board of directors unanimously recommends that you support and vote FOR the charter change when you receive your ballot."
Yeah, a charter change to a "Savings Bank" so they can do things like "issue stock, even though they don't need the money".
Nowhere is this information on their website, it's a huge secret for "members only". Luckily, a couple members launched a Facebook and web protest and members get to vote on this.
Again though, the Credit Union sends out these elaborate color mailings and recorded phone calls, and members are paying for that. After we stop this, the next campaign should be for new board members.
Had my own problems with that one a couple of years back when I noticed that I had not received a statement during the normal billing cycle. I wrote to the bank and called but to no avail. I said that I hoped they didn't purposely refrain from sending out a bill in order to have a missed payment and an excuse to charge a late-payment fee.
I was ignored and when a statement did come a month later, a late-payment fee was imposed. It took months of trying to get that fee rescinded. It eventually was rescinded but I had already cut up my card and mailed it back to the bank. My returned card and the bank's statement of rescinding the illegal fee crossed each other in the mail. I have since ignored all attempts by Capital One to again become a customer.
I have had the same problem with other banks plus the problem of having a bank hold a payment for several days in order to impose a late-payment fee.
RSS feed for comments to this post