RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "Mr. Romney doesn't understand the double standard where government checks, whether already paid for or not, to people are called 'entitlements' while far bigger checks to corporations are called 'incentives.'"

Mitt Romney speaks during a campaign event at Monterey Mills in Janesville, Wis., on June 18, 2012. (photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
Mitt Romney speaks during a campaign event at Monterey Mills in Janesville, Wis., on June 18, 2012. (photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)


Romney Is a Corporation Masquerading As an Individual for President

By Ralph Nader, Reader Supported News

20 September 12

 

here was something missing from the release of a tape showing Mitt Romney pandering to fat cats in Boca Raton, Florida with these very inflammatory words: "There are 47 percent who are with him, (Obama) who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it. These are people who pay no income tax."Romney said his job "is not to worry about those people.”

Hey, Mitt, why start with the 47 percent? Fully 100 percent of the nation's 500 biggest corporations are dependent on various kinds of corporate welfare - subsidies, giveaways, bailouts, waivers, and other dazzling preferences - while many pay no tax at all on very substantial profits (see their familiar names - General Electric, Pepco, Verizon etc. - here).

Are the corporations that receive this corporate welfare going to vote for President Obama? (Mr. Romney has declared that corporations are people.) Of course they're not. Nor are all of the 47 percent of people who are "dependent upon government.”

Mr. Romney doesn't understand the double standard where government checks, whether already paid for or not, to people are called "entitlements"while far bigger checks to corporations are called "incentives."Romney has lost control of his self-consciousness. Here is a man who talks about 47 percent of American households paying no income taxes (more on this later) while he has refused, unlike his father, to release back years of tax returns because they'll show he has parked much of his wealth and income in foreign tax havens like the Bahamas precisely in order to avoid paying U.S. taxes.

Indeed, as tax expert and former New York Times Pulitzer prize-winner David Cay Johnston said on Democracy Now, Romney has maneuvered the tax laws so that his five sons will continue to receive millions of tax-free dollars from their parents' enormous pot of wealth.

Why aren't the big-time Democrats making much more of an issue of this "make or break"Romney campaign vulnerability? Maybe it is because, as author Kevin Phillips once said, "The Republicans go for the jugulars while the Democrats go for the capillaries.”

Now, either ignorance, callousness or both infected Mitt Romney's pejorative characterizations of the "government dependent"47 percent with victim mentalities who believe that they are entitled to the government providing them the necessities of life without paying income tax. Let's see who these people are in these recessionary times. Unemployed Americans. Americans who are too poor to pay income taxes. Elderly Americans who live on their social security checks from money for which they spent their decades of working years paying. Americans using the "earned income tax credit,"so vigorously supported and extended by President Ronald Reagan. And disabled Americans who have no dollars for any income tax.

What do many of the 47 percent pay to the government? They pay payroll taxes for social security and Medicare, federal fees and state and local taxes on their property, and sales taxes.

The avarice of Romney and his buddies at the strip-mining, job-exporting, bankrupting private equity company called Bain Capital has no bounds. He thinks it's perfectly fine for companies like Verizon, Boeing, Duke Energy, Navistar, Wells Fargo and Pepco to use all of our country's government funded public infrastructures and services, and yet not only pay no income tax but actually rig the tax system so they can get billions back in "benefits"from the U.S. Treasury, as General Electric has done for years. At the same time, Romney never speaks out against 35,000 super-wealthy Americans who also do not pay any federal income tax. He rarely questions crony capitalism, wants to maintain an even bigger bloated military budget, and spearheads the many-sided supremacy of corporations over real people throughout our entire political economy. He is, essentially, a corporation running for president masquerading as an individual.

If the Democrats are anything but inept and defeatist, they will wrap Romney around Congressman Paul Ryan, his vice-presidential nominee, and recover the Congress in November. The Romney-Ryan campaign is now hanging by a few threads, unmasked even before those millions of American voters who dutifully vote for politicians who disrespect and betray their economic plight and political powerlessness once in office.

The so-called presidential debates are coming up (see Open Debates.org). Let's see if President Obama thinks it is fair play to recall Mr. Romney's words and put his underlying real values on the table before tens of millions of viewers.

Romney's excursus in Boca Raton was not a gaffe. It was the inner Romney, raised by good Romneys but braised by the fevered extremists in his party who have asserted that today Ronald Reagan himself would not receive their vote.



Ralph Nader is a consumer advocate, lawyer and author. His most recent book - and first novel - is "Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us." His most recent work of non-fiction is "The Seventeen Traditions."

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+35 # Barbara K 2012-09-21 07:03
You are absolutely correct, Mr. Nader, i think most of us already figured it out that Romneyhood is nothing but a corporation. He thinks they are people. No wonder he has such a hard time acting human, and cannot relate to real people. He has been in an ivory tower all his life and knows nothing of what everyday people go thru on a daily basis. We want a real human for President. It isn't him.

OBAMA/BIDEN 2012 for all of us.
The alternative is unbearable.
 
 
+20 # TrueAmericanPatriot 2012-09-21 08:25
A real HUMAN for president is EXACTLY what we need, Barbara; you're on point as usual! As far as Nader stating that Romney is either callous or ignorant, he is wrong about the latter, because Robmey KNOWS FULL WELL what he is doing. The latter term for Mittens should be "stupid." Nader is right about Democrats needing to go for the jugular instead of the capillaries. If I had the money, I KNOW that I could create at least 40 TV ads from the secret video that would be effective enough to sink his campaign WEEKS before the election! If this isn't a wake up call for the "RINO voters" who have been "mesmerized" since Ronnie-boy, Barbara, I don't know WHAT WILL!!!

As you and I both know:

NEVER VOTE RETHUGLICAN, NOW OR EVER!!!! TIME TO CUT THE CORPORATIONS BACK DOWN TO MANAGEABLE SIZE!

OBAMA - BIDEN 2012!!!! GET OUT THE VOTE AND GET OUT TO VOTE!!!!!
 
 
+8 # ganymede 2012-09-21 08:38
Ralph Nader, We are a flawed nation, and yet, through divine providence we are going to rise again, and much of the credit goes to you for being such a clarion voice of sanity and intelligence. Yes, you are to be forgiven for your misjudgment in running against Gore in 2000, because with Gore we would never have invaded Iraq and destroyed that country, but I still think you are one of the greatest living Americans and are doing a great job to help stamp out the incipient fascism which will go down once and for all with Romney's defeat and the destruction of the Republican Party.
 
 
+7 # Regina 2012-09-21 10:48
Romney scorns and scathes people on public funds, and accuses them of thinking they're "entitled" to such money. But he was "born to it," an old phrase for feelings of entitlement to unearned wealth. This nation was not made for an aristocracy, so Mitt is badly out of place here. And he hasn't much place here -- his emplacement is in Switzerland, the Cayman Islands, China's sweatshops, etc. His cohorts continue portraying Obama as a "foreigner," but there's far more foreignness in Romney, including his Mexican birth. Where are the "birthers" now???
 
 
+10 # szq5777 2012-09-21 11:21
I think Romney is a CEO robot. If he is elected he will think of the average American citizen as an expendable employee and act accordingly. He is incapible of anything else. Romney is programed to think that WE will be working for HIM and by the way he likes to fire people! That is a frightning thought!
 
 
+4 # Eliza D 2012-09-21 12:47
So eloquently stated as usual, Mr. Nader. I am horrified to know that some of my intelligent friends actually admire what they see as Romney's entrepreneurial and clear-eyed vision for America. Nothing could be further from the truth, as you well know, as he and Ryan want to eviscerate Social Security and Medicare, making worthless the contributions that myself and millions of others have made into those programs. I always need ammunition to fight the false and illogical claims others make about Romney, and you help provide it. Of course, YOU should have been President. Please know that there are many of us who wholeheartedly supported your candidacy.
 
 
+4 # Jorge 2012-09-21 17:46
Ralph Nader would have been President for 100% of the Americans (not 100-47%). Nader and Jimmy Carter still have good advice for America, to help the political pendulum swing back from it's right-wing arc... to a more sane and humane place. How ironic that Willard the Rat Romney was speaking in Boca Raton (translated as "Mouth of the Rat").
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN