RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Kucinich writes: "This Labor Day, President Obama has the opportunity to defend the economic rights of millions of Americans by supporting a substantial increase in the minimum wage."

A wage protest at Washington University in St. Louis. Bernstein argues that a national minimum wage increase is necessary to reduce problems of wage inequality. (photo: Huy Richard Mach/AP)
A wage protest at Washington University in St. Louis. Bernstein argues that a national minimum wage increase is necessary to reduce problems of wage inequality. (photo: Huy Richard Mach/AP)



America Deserves a Raise

By Rep. Dennis Kucinich, Reader Supported News

01 September 12

 

his Labor Day, President Obama has the opportunity to defend the economic rights of millions of Americans by supporting a substantial increase in the minimum wage.

Presently $7.25 per hour, the federal minimum wage is inadequate. The purchasing power of a worker earning minimum wage in 1968 is equal to $10-11 today. That means, at $7.25 an hour, workers today have less wage power than workers in 1968.

Consider that an individual working full-time and taking no vacation or sick time will earn only $1,160 per month. Housing costs alone in a neighborhood in my hometown of Cleveland can easily approach most of the income of a full-time employee earning minimum wage. What about food? What about transportation? What about health care? What about providing for children?

The minimum wage is not a living wage. Taxpayers, through financing a range of social programs, end up subsidizing corporations who do not pay a living wage. Every worker should be paid enough to meet the essential needs of his or her family. Economically secure families make stronger communities which in turn strengthens our nation. This Labor Day let's show that our nation values families by increasing the minimum wage to $10 an hour.

We know that some corporations won't like it. If corporations don't place value on the dignity, happiness or well-being of the American workers, then government must step in to protect workers' economic well-being. Workers are more than a line item in a corporate budget. The United States of America must be more than a profit-seeking machine. I am not suggesting a government handout, but a hand-up, enabling workers to climb out of a fiscal ditch.

The wealth in this nation has been accelerating upwards, leaving behind too many people who helped build America. The wealth that is produced by working Americans must be accessible to working Americans through an increase in the minimum wage. The Federal Reserve is incapable of stirring the economy, which is another reason to act. With unemployment at least 8.3%, an increase in the minimum wage will stimulate the overall economy.

Labor Day 2012. There can be no better way to honor the American worker then to support an increase in the minimum wage, to a living wage of at least $10 per hour. Workers deserve a raise. America deserves a raise. The President can show his recognition of workers by supporting H.R. 5901, Catching Up To 1968 Act of 2012, which would increase the minimum wage to $10 per hour. That would be one Happy Labor Day.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+58 # Barbara K 2012-09-01 08:46
Absolutely, raise the minimum raise to $10 or even $12 an hour. It would also help the economy, as people would be able to have some buying power. If CEOs can afford their bonuses, they can certainly afford to pay the workers enough money to live on. The workers wouldn't need food stamps or Medicaid, they could be self-sufficient , and it is a good way to start rebuilding the middle class.
 
 
+9 # tahoevalleylines 2012-09-01 10:43
Raise salaries raise prices raise inflation raise interest rates...

Without solidarity there is no general strike without general strike there is same old same old...

Ike moved us into the rubber tire economy and did not consider big military needed to assure imported oil flow would bring military industrial complex...

This writer your humble servant foresaw demolished local railway connectors leading to loss of energy independence and foreign entanglements along with the unending war footing...

Loss of energy independence and need to import oil paid for with borrowed money long ago ended America as a lending not a borrowing nation...

Good night.
 
 
+18 # ritaague 2012-09-01 12:52
Kudos to Dennis Kucinich, for the umpteenth time - what a 'no strings attached' people first pol. Kucinich is, and always has been. Ray of hope to we the sheeple, now nearly hopeless.

And, yes, Barbara K, right on, although I do doubt if CEO's understand what they can or cannot afford, as engulfed in their greed and power over all addiction as they are. Unlike booze addicts (a.k.a. alcoholics), they don't pull back from driving while drunk, fearing for a DUI that suspends their license and/or gives them jail time. Ain't any aversive consequences for the villainaire rulers and/or the politican puppets. And, until there are strong aversives put into place (i.e. mandatory jail time for corporate theft, defrauding, failure to honor regulations, etc.), these evil addicts will continue to enslave us all.

The 1% CEO's,
 
 
+8 # pietheyn 2012-09-02 18:31
The last time I checked,the minimum wage in Australia was $15.51AU per hour. Presently, the $AU is 4% stronger than the Greenback.
 
 
+2 # mdhome 2012-09-04 05:44
It just is not right that someone working full time needs to have government assistance and the CEO gets millions, the effect is the government donating money to the CEO. If the company paid enough so the workers do not need government aid, maybe the poor CEO would only get enough income to put him (her) into the top 10% instead of the top 1%. Boo hoo! STOP the government assistance to the rich, because that is what is happening now!
 
 
+40 # Cynthia 2012-09-01 09:29
Routinely, the banksters foreclose on a property within 6 months (not
giving the homeowner a refi), yet they already got paid through the bailout
(gave themselves raises or whatever). When they foreclose, they get a
second payout (double dipping) for the one property they're foreclosing
upon. To make matters even more egregious is the banksters let the
property taxes go into a delinquent state. This is allowed in all cities
and counties that a property can be delinquent in property taxes for up to
5 years before the State takes the property and puts it up for auction.
So, the banks then avoid paying the delinquent taxes by passing this
obligation onto the buyer of the foreclosed property.

This delinquency is causing vital services to be cut in each city and county of our fair state.

So, our local lawmakers should institute yet another cost saving/money generating law in that banks which foreclose on a home should be required to pay the
property taxes from day 1. Surely, they can afford it and they owe it to
the taxpayers of each city and county since we bailed them out because they
were "too big to fail" -- and they're failing us now yet again at every
turn.
 
 
+3 # cenglish10 2012-09-02 09:14
Great idea! Set up a petition!
 
 
+30 # DaveM 2012-09-01 09:29
A number of years ago, a group of fruit growers in California called for an increase in the minimum wage, saying that the sort of employees they were able to hire for that salary were not up to their standards. Oddly, it never occurred to them to offer higher pay and perhaps attract more capable workers.
 
 
+10 # brux 2012-09-01 16:12
I heard this somewhere on the radio last night ... Common Wealth Club ?

Why when we got rid of slavery after the Civil War, SUPPOSEDLY, do we need a slave class now ... can we do better than that.

This is all about ripping people off, and that's why most products have gotten shoddy, food has gotten to where it is making us sick, we cannot afford even the shoddy houses ... things are not adding up because everything just gets sucked up to the top.
 
 
+1 # cenglish10 2012-09-02 09:15
They are used to corporate welfare! And being mandated to do the right thing, not just do it!
 
 
+36 # pamelawy 2012-09-01 09:31
What workers? Most jobs have been shipped overseas. (sorry, slight exaggeration, but just making a point.... or is it an exaggeration?) When are we going to penalize corporations that off-shore most of their jobs and manufacturing - oh, and their $$$ ?
 
 
+4 # GlennCaton 2012-09-01 16:46
Pamelawy,

Good for you!

Punish Them!!!

Do some research, figure out who they are and what they sell and don't buy their stuff. Spread the word to your friends. Nag them until they do the same!

Nothing punishes a company more than when they lose their sales.

Own their stock? Find out and dump it! Tell your friends and nag them to do the same!

Hurt the bastards! Cut off their sales!

Plenty of good American manufacturers trying to do right by their help. Shop with them! Means shopping on the internet, but by so doing you can save traffic hassles and pumping unnecessary carbon dioxide into the air.
 
 
+11 # mickeynow 2012-09-01 09:42
Corporations aren't going to like this nor are small businesses. Screw the corporations. I do feel for small businesses, though. I have been advocating for too many years that every adult be given $25,000 tax free at the beginning of the year as a means of spreading money around. If that person wants to make more money by working, fine. The other side of the coin is that if a person blows their money, no more is available. All other safety nets are abolished. The tax code is revised so that there are no corporate free rides, no exemptions whatsoever. All USA corporations doing business in the USA are not allowed to hide behind tax havens around the world. Profits from stocks and investments are taxed just like income that ordinary people receive. Income distribution like this would be advantageous for our country. Oh, wait, be prepared for such an outcry of monumental proportions, the likes of which we have never heard. Also, I just woke up from this weird dream I had about a plan to give citizens an opportunity to enjoy life the way it's supposed to be enjoyed. Let the outcry begin.
 
 
+3 # brux 2012-09-01 16:15
> The other side of the coin is that if a person blows their money, no more is available.

I like the idea partially. But this defect is a killer ... the whole point of a safety net is so people cannot blow it.

I think there should be like a minimum living wage, provided for people as part of infrastructure, then the minimum wage can go away and people could afford to work for what they are worth - so if you are just starting a career, you may want to just volunteer, and you have your basics covered by the government so you can afford to do that.

The biggest problem we have today is keeping the rotten people NOT WORKING so they don't screw stuff up. Let them get credits going to school and bettering themselves - that is something we ought to pay for and it would be worth it.
 
 
+3 # mickeynow 2012-09-01 17:58
I guess my thinking is that if a person blows through $25,000, maybe that person has more serious problems than we can help with. One of the side effects of providing the money to people is that maybe robbery, stealing, break-ins, etc. would lessen, thereby there would be less need for police, courts, prisons, and lawyers to be involved. I know one of the arguments is that people should not get something for nothing, but as I see it, there's a lot of companies, military, and others now getting a lot of something for nothing right now in this system. How do corporations get tax money back when they haven't paid any? The system is so messed up. Perhaps, the whole $25,000 doesn't need to be paid up front all at once. Maybe once a month like social security. It's a dream because right now plenty of people can't find work and they are qualified. We must do better in electing officials who aren't beholden to the rich. Say goodnight to Citizens United and any other items that don't contribute to the good of the country.
 
 
0 # brux 2012-09-02 02:59
I think my idea makes more sense, because if people get a lot of money at once, businesses will pump up their prices to suck it all up, whereas if you make the basics of life available, it is non transferable and you do not need to see someone blow $25K to know they have issues and need help.

give people a minimum, a base, and if they want make it available for them to climb up and out of that - some will not.
 
 
+1 # cenglish10 2012-09-02 09:23
I dont think you are grasping the minimum wage concept. It is not a safety net. It is so that people who are working, get the wage they deserve and the government doesnt pick up the corporation's tab. The minimum wage doesnt disappear, a person can always apply to a higher paying job, if there is one, and if they are qualified. But not being skilled shouldnt be a death sentence, ie hunger and poverty. Undocumented people are especially vulnerable, a slavery of sorts.
 
 
+1 # cenglish10 2012-09-02 09:20
To: MickeyNow:

It would seem fairly easy to say that businesses who employ under 25 workers could pay less than minimum wage. Although labor is one of things you can write off in business. I would also incorporate a clause that says you dont get any writeoffs for setting up a shop overseas or for labor that you employ overseas.
 
 
+11 # cordleycoit 2012-09-01 10:16
A living wage is an anathema to the people who own America. They now they own everything think about crushing workers like bugs. Nothing new here and now they have decertified the unions they can do it.
It's like the web a place where the labor is poorly paid except for the stars who ever they are.
 
 
-42 # ecoforestree 2012-09-01 10:26
Lol! Obama caring about working people? He's too busy honing his golf game! Why are you pretending that Obama is not in the pocket of the banksters, Dennis? Why do I not hear you speaking out against Obama's war on the people of Syria? I see you have learned how the D's throw their own under the bus. I guess staying a good Democrat didn't work, huh?
 
 
+19 # K-K-K-Katie 2012-09-01 11:46
Obama has spent many more days on the job than Bush ever did. So that part of your statement is bogus. I am disappointed that Bush and Cheny and the banksters have not been prosecuted, and I am disappointed that Obama has not gotten more aggressive with Israel about their treatment of the Palestinians. Nonetheless, he's doing his best to keep his promises in a bad environment, and I trust him more than I ever would Romney and his Tea Party VP. What we NEED is a super-majority of progressives in the Senate! You guys, if you can, send $10 to ANY progressive running for a Senate seat!!
 
 
-15 # Fight Back 2012-09-01 12:07
[quote name="ecoforest ree"] Why are you pretending that Obama is not in the pocket of the banksters, Dennis? "

Why are you pretending that Kucinich said or een hinted at anything of the kind/ Why are you pretending to be engaged in a dialog seeking understanding when all you really want is to demonstrate how 'clever" you think you are?
 
 
+4 # reiverpacific 2012-09-01 19:50
Quoting Fight Back:
[quote name="ecoforestree"] Why are you pretending that Obama is not in the pocket of the banksters, Dennis? "

Why are you pretending that Kucinich said or een hinted at anything of the kind/ Why are you pretending to be engaged in a dialog seeking understanding when all you really want is to demonstrate how 'clever" you think you are?

Holding some kind of personal or abstract grudge whilst offering nothing in the way of suggestions or solutions is not exactly a way to get anything done or proposed.
Personal attacks without basic verifiable fact, thereby stimulating illuminating debate, are about as welcome and productive as a fart in a space-suit and all to common on the right.
We are listening to, or reading, the words of one true leader who has stuck to his guns consistently for many years and whom the owner-media have discredited for calling them on their wanton lies, and who will no longer be in office come January 2013, as a result of a nasty piece of political redistricting which in any alleged "democracy" should be illegal.
So what's y'r point -if you have one?! You have no point but personal and it's therefore moot.
Why do you pretend to sound "wiser" and more "analytical" than you seem to be?
Give us the facts and the foils mate!
 
 
+8 # The Ice Maiden 2012-09-02 04:03
ecoforestree - We have two options this November. That's really IT. If you think the Republicans will support the Average Joe, I can only ask: What are you smokin'?
Fact-checkers are apoplectic over the outright LIES that Republicans are repeating in a determined effort to buy/lie this election. Medicare being changed to a voucher system where the insurance companies will charge us LESS? Again: what are you smokin'?

I could go on and on. But one thing keeps coming to mind: In all the speeches, the Republicans keep saying that they will increase jobs, make our world better, etc., usually without specifying exactly what tool they intend to use to accomplish these ends. But they have blocked every single effort by Obama to do the same. Who's got your back, ecoforestree? If the Republicans really want to help the average American citizen, WHY DIDN'T THEY WORK WITH THE ELECTED PRESIDENT TO DO SO OVER THE LAST 4 YEARS?
 
 
+6 # shawnsargent2000 2012-09-02 06:24
Thanks Ice Maiden, It is empowering to know, that there are Americans that get it, and can see through the lies of the repugnants! When Jon Boener tfirst ook up the gavel as Speaker of the House, he said
" We are going to ensure that Obama is a one term president "
Upon, hearing that, I nearly smashed my tv in rage, at the audacity of that man, and his one way party.
I am voting Dem completely down the line, because there simply isn't any other choice.
 
 
+4 # Antemedius 2012-09-01 10:54
Socialist freak.

Doesn't Dennis know that there are investment bankers starving and wasting away to mere shadows of themselves on Wall Street?

Not to mention all the weapons manufacturers living hand to mouth and lined up at soup lines all over the damn country, and insurance company CEO's desperately hanging on to life by ever fraying threads?

Sheesh. What's the world coming to when simple con artists like the president have barely enough support to make a second term anymore?

And this used to be such a great country.

Whatever happened to "Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore,

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,

I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
 
 
+20 # lamancha 2012-09-01 11:08
Given the obscene wages & bonuses paid to corporate executives, how can we not lift the minimum wage to a minimum of $10.00 p.h. and more equitably, to $12.00 p.h.? The wealth of the 1% has increased exponentially and getting more outlandish each year. And, yes, the government that Republicans love to assail, must step up to the plate, grant the substantial increased min. wage, which will pump more life into the economy and force corporations to cut executive pay; at the same time, heavily penalize corporations for outsourcing jobs as well as corporate takeovers and even for downsizing. All corporate executives must be made to attend classes in human benovolence, workers struggles and the excesses of greed.
 
 
+17 # giraffee2012 2012-09-01 11:12
Raising the minimum wage is a start! Taxing the "income" (no matter where it comes from) equally (without loop holes) is a start! Honesty is a start!

So let's begin with the minimum wage - it's a beginning.

In the meantime, please vote 2012 - and drag out all who can vote also. Do NOT be afraid to tell your friends/relativ es truths - even if "they" heard false at the RNC or on FAUX -

VOTE OBAMA and straight DEM (or "Bye bye American Democracy") - I cannot sing either!
 
 
+4 # brux 2012-09-01 16:16
There is no point in taxing income for people who are not in a sustainable lifestyle, it makes no sense.
 
 
+17 # gotabrain 2012-09-01 11:17
On the other side of the wage issue is the GINI index. For those of you who don't know what this is, the GINI is a formula to measure the concentration of wealth in any given country, on a scale of 0 to 100; 0 meaning all the wealth in the country is distributed evenly among everyone. A 100 rating would mean one person has all the cash.
Our country has had a rating of over a 46 since the year 2000! Our rating before the Great Depression was estimated at a 45! Most developed countries have a rating in the high 20's to mid 30's.
The higher the number, the more the wealth is concentrated in the hands of the few.
America's best rating in the last 50 years was in 1968 at a 38. Coincidentally, (not), the minimum wage had the most buying power and middle class America was at it's strongest!
Anyone who tells you that we can't afford a min. wage hike is either a wealthy money hoarder, or out of touch with reality.
A min. wage hike would raise wages for those near the bottom, increase demand, and increase revenue for our government! But, most of all, it would pull some cash out of greedy bass-turds hands that have been hoarding their wealth, refusing to invest in our country!
 
 
+15 # walt 2012-09-01 11:44
Dennis Kucinich is again right on as he always is.

But what the USA needs even more are "living wages." Those are the kind that allow people to live a good life and spend money in the economy. Unfortunately that is just what Republicans have fought against for years as they cater to their 1% backers.
 
 
+2 # GlennCaton 2012-09-01 18:43
What happened to the old notion of priming the pump? If you choke off the money going to workers, they can't afford to buy your products. Kind of reminds me of killing the goose that lays the golden egg. I think that they thought the Chinese would be big free spenders, but they have been poor for so long that they do not trust the meager improvements. They are hanging on to their cash and even the Chinese economy is slowing down. Mitt Romney was talking about honoring "time-tested traditions". One of those traditions has always been the notion of a maximum sustainable profit which was thought to be around 8%. If your business was generating more than that, you were cutting too many corners. Maximum sustainable growth was considered to be 6%. Try taking those kinds of numbers to stockholders since the internet bubble. You wouldn't stay CEO for long. Crushingly, no more $26 million compensation package! Unfortunately, that tradition still holds true. It is why so many American companies outsourced their manufacturing, packaging, and distribution: It gets in the way of profit. Consider Apple. They don't really manufacture much of anything anymore. All outsourced. They made 47% EBIT this year and are sitting on more than $130 billion.
 
 
+12 # CC1951 2012-09-01 11:46
There has never been such an unbalance in the earning qualities, not since the " gilded" age of late 1800's. I may be showing my age, but I remember when a Mustang went for $5000.00 and we bought our house for $20,000.00! That same house goes for $350,000.00 in today's market. The Republicans are no friends to the average joe-- and I do not comprehend a need for elevators in garages. Something stinks.
LadyD
 
 
-3 # dick 2012-09-01 12:43
The Left, even after the Stimulus fiasco, lines up to demand a Gimme This, Gimme That, including the hollow, ritualistic Labor Day only demand for a higher Min.Wage. Instead: #1. Hold Wall St. ACCOUNTABLE; totally reconstruct US finance system around smaller entities & public option ATMs at the Post Office. #2. Retrofit real estate in limbo for energy efficiency, smaller residences, JOBS, JOBS, JOBS. #3. Replace energy guzzling infrastructure with green alternatives. #4. Expand access to Medicare & let Medicare do prescriptions.
 
 
+13 # pernsey 2012-09-01 14:23
Quoting dick:
The Left, even after the Stimulus fiasco, lines up to demand a Gimme This, Gimme That, including the hollow, ritualistic Labor Day only demand for a higher Min.Wage. Instead: #1. Hold Wall St. ACCOUNTABLE; totally reconstruct US finance system around smaller entities & public option ATMs at the Post Office. #2. Retrofit real estate in limbo for energy efficiency, smaller residences, JOBS, JOBS, JOBS. #3. Replace energy guzzling infrastructure with green alternatives. #4. Expand access to Medicare & let Medicare do prescriptions.


We could have all that stuff Dick, if the "Boner" and the republicans would quit blocking everything for people, by voting NO on everything for the people.

Why would you begrudge people who want to make a semi decent living wage? No one is saying gimmie...why should we give the corporations corporate welfare...do the oil companies who are raking in billions in profit need government subsidies? NO they dont, but they get them (corporate welfare). Why arent you griping about the corporations that are saying gimmie gimmie...nooo just keep trashing the regular people for trying to survive, thats the republican way. Trash the poor and middle class while propping up and never talking about how our money props up these greedy corporations.

Mitt Romney is not going to do anything but deregulate business and it will be like Bush on steroids.
 
 
+4 # GlennCaton 2012-09-01 16:05
Sadly, pernsey, workers are players in a rigged game. High unemployment is good for driving down wages, but low wages lead to low demand and the economy stagnates, even with cheap labor. We are made to feel guilty for wanting a living wage by folks who routinely make $80,000 a year and more. Hell, even my poorly paid coworkers thought that GM workers making $65,000/ year were overpaid! That amounts to $32.50/hour. Less than their mechanic makes! A quarter of what their dentist makes. Making less than $25/hour makes you dependent on entitlements, which, in turn makes you a drag on your community instead of a contributor. Your employer is forcing you and your community to underwrite his profitability. My employer makes 21% EBIT using workers that make, on average, $12/hour. I'll wager he thinks of himself as a cornerstone of the community, and a successful entrepreneur instead of a leach. Too bad that all of the people whose opinions he respects are also leaches.
 
 
0 # The Ice Maiden 2012-09-03 15:36
"The Left, even after the Stimulus fiasco, lines up to demand a Gimme This, Gimme That"

Dick - As usual, you sound like a dick with your response. I am a leftie and I've worked since I was 13 years old. I take your stupid LEFTIE comments as a personal insult. And you think the Right - as opposed to us Lefties - are likely to "Expand access to Medicare & let Medicare do prescriptions"? What are you smokin'? Ryan and Romney want to replace Medicare with private sector vouchers. God help us all. But if I were to play Devil's Advocate: If you are proposing that this country EXPAND access to Medicare - a big impediment to a balanced budget - then aren't YOU the one saying Gimme Gimme?
 
 
+10 # GlennCaton 2012-09-01 15:49
Ah, Mr. Kucinich, damned again by setting your sights WAY too low! The old rule of 25s said that you needed to budget in four 25% chunks. You should pay no more than 25% of your TAKE HOME PAY for housing. Individual workers should not have to share a one bedroom apartment. In my area, the average one bedroom rents for $720/month. That means that worker should make at least $18/ hour TAKE HOME. Add taxes, SSN, Medicare, disability, retirement, and medical insurance and you are up to $25/hour just to be financially responsible. That takes you up to $50,000/year. Since 73% of workers make less than that, you can see that nearly three quarters of workers are too poor to be fully financially responsible. Is it any wonder that the economy of this country is in the toilet? No one can afford to buy anything! Fix the economy? Pay the workers! Shut down all imported goods from countries were the average wage is less than $50,000 a year and you will quickly return to full employment. Wages will rise as a result of demand. Globalism is the mechanism used to impoverish workers in developed nations. We MUST stop it now!
 
 
+1 # cenglish10 2012-09-02 09:32
Good point. Minimum Wage $25/hr. Yeppers that will fly. The whole country would indeed be awash in cash, but noone would vote for such an idea, because they would be too worried about somebody not deserving it! And the CEO's will pour enough cash in to lobbying and advertising to quash it. $12 would make a difference....
 
 
+7 # fredboy 2012-09-01 15:51
We deserve a lot more than a raise for putting up with the bullshit of the past 12 years.
 
 
+5 # GlennCaton 2012-09-01 16:36
Try 50, Fredboy. US Steel started the outsourcing boom in 1962 when they outsourced steel production to Japan and began to 64,000 steel workers on the soup line, nearly killing Pittsburgh. To this day, when I see their logo on the Steeler's uniform I want to puke.
 
 
+4 # dick 2012-09-01 19:08
I think we should junk the minimum wage for the Living Wage, COLA for inflation, no Soc Sec tax on worker until L.W. level is hit. But Dems are more interested in clique by clique pandering, pork barreling, & sucking up to Wall St. criminals. At least the GOpers UNITE around something: tax cuts (& white supremacy).
Dems had landslide victory, huge progressive majority in House, filibuster proof majority in Senate, & nation dying for Real Change, Real Reform. ObamaDems gave US Bush lite. Sucks.
No brains, no guts, just Wall St. pardon. Sell-out. Betrayal.
 
 
0 # The Ice Maiden 2012-09-03 16:10
dick - WHAT ARE YOU SMOKIN'? The Democrats may have had enough bodies to pass laws assuming they acted like a block. They didn't act like herds of sheep because they aren't Republicans. You think the Republicans - led by someone like Romney and his Bain Capital mentality, and Ryan with his affection for the ruthless Ann Rand philosophy - are less likely to suck up to Wall Street? Are you nuts? Seriously: what are you smokin'?
 
 
+1 # cenglish10 2012-09-02 09:12
The bible says in I Timothy 5:17: "For the Scripture says, “You must not muzzle an ox to keep it from eating as it treads out the grain.” And in another place, “Those who work deserve their pay!” So the religious right should be in favor of this law, unless they are selectively deciding how the bible is to be interpreted, which of course they would never do.
 
 
+2 # fishmother 2012-09-02 14:00
I'd like to see the members of congress be asked to live on $7.25 per hour for a full month, without beneft of their comfortable salaries, royalties, and benefits
 
 
0 # Joe Bob 2012-09-03 09:58
We have been FOOLED by the powers that be. The fooling is in the brainwashed thinking that if people make a living wage, the cost of everything we need will go up....Who's gonna pay for that ?
NO, ALL that will happen is that the corporate profits will go down. The money is there, it always has been there, and there is always more than enough to go around.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN