RFK Jr. writes: "If American democracy is to survive, we clearly need to restore integrity and representative democracy to our electoral process and get control of an industry that is using its enormous financial power to enrich itself, destroy the planet and undermine everything we value. Last week's events are merely a foreshadowing of the devolution that is inexorably propelling us toward a corrupt venal and petro kleptocracy."
Environmental activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (photo: Santa Clara University)
Petro Plutocracy
08 May 12
ast week, the world got a preview of America's new post Citizens United petro plutocracy with the oil lords flexing their political muscles like oil soaked body builders pumped up on a steroid drip of campaign dollars. It was all about fracking. The petro tycoons first orchestrated the forced resignation of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) top frack patch enforcer, then adeptly forced the same cowed agency to stall its release of a damaging scientific study on fracking and finally strong armed the Interior Department to open America's public lands to gas companies without prior disclosure of their frack chemicals.
On Monday, the oil industry showcased its political muscle by forcing the resignation of EPA's popular environmental enforcement chief for the Gulf region, Dr. Al Armendariz. Dr. Al was beloved by environmentalists, civic leaders, and poor and minority communities across five states for his willingness to strictly enforce environmental rules regardless of the lawbreakers' political clout. But Armendariz's courage won him powerful enemies as well. He was steadfastly undeterred by relentless pressure from polluters and their allies including political intrigue, hamstringing budget cuts, and even death threats directed at him and his family. But this week, the world's most powerful cartel - an international syndicate feared even by the Obama Administration - finally brought Dr. Armendariz down. Armendariz's mistake was promising to enforce the law against Big Oil in the shale gas fields.
Several weeks ago, a two-year old-videotape surfaced showing Dr. Armendariz addressing a group of frightened and skeptical businessmen, civil leaders and property owners in Dish, Texas, a gas patch town familiar with government's anemic enforcement record against the oil barons. Dish's citizenry were terrified that reckless, dangerous and illegal practices by shale-gas fracking companies might jeopardize their community's property values, water supplies, jobs, local businesses and human health. Dish's Mayor, Calvin Tillman, who attended the meeting, had already moved his home away from the frack fields due to the daily nosebleeds afflicting his children ever since fracking operations commenced. Armenderiz assured Dish's shaken citizens that the EPA would enforce the law strictly in order to quickly bring industry outlaws into line.
This was too much for Congress' "law and order" Republicans who apparently believe that oil companies, and shale fracking in particular, should be above the law. Lead by U.S. Senator, James Inhofe (R-Okla.), Big Petroleum's sock-puppet-in-chief, Congressional Republicans forced Armenderiz's dismissal. (As a private citizen, Dr. Al is no longer entitled to FBI protection and has had to appeal to the Dallas police for protection against continuing assassination threats.) Instead of the deterrence, for which Dr. Al had hoped, the episode sent an altogether different public message; government enforcers can lose their jobs by suggesting that the oil companies ought to obey America's laws.
The Republicans complained that Armenderiz, by way of reassuring Dish's frightened and skeptical townsfolk, referenced, as a metaphor, the ancient Roman practices of roadside crucifixion and burning villages to deter violators. Attorneys are familiar with such historical touchstones which are routinely invoked by law professors and "tough on crime" prosecutors to illustrate the concept of deterrence. If Armedariz had been speaking about any other crime than pollution from fracking, and any type of alleged criminal other than certain oil frackers, the same republican lawmakers would have applauded his muscular commitment to merciless rigor.
From its inception, hydrofracking has been an outlaw enterprise. The industry was born in a provision drafted in secret by oilman Dick Cheney's clandestine energy task force specifically exempting it from the Safe Drinking Water Act, a shale fracking method devised and patented by Cheney's former company Halliburton. The Vice President's henchmen then rammed the exemption though a supplicant post 9/11 Congress. Rough and tumble competition among fracking companies have turned the frack fields from North Dakota to Pennsylvania into modern Dodge Cities. Regulatory capture has given some of the industry's worst actors de facto immunity from their criminal behavior.
In states like Pennsylvania and West Virginia, the fracking industry has flourished through habitual law breaking, including illegal dumping of horrendous toxins into public sewage treatment plants utterly unequipped to treat those poisons, using substandard casing protocols that regularly contaminate people's groundwater with carcinogenic benzene and explosive methane, and illegally filling streams to build roads, pipelines and drill pads. These species of habitual lawbreakers require the protection of crooked politicians and captive agencies to insulate criminal companies from the consequences of their illegal behavior. Oil companies are experts at using campaign contributions to purchase this class of government cooperation.
In another demonstration of its impressive power, two days after Dr. Al's resignation, the frack industry won another political battle - forcing cowed Interior Department officials to allow gas companies to frack on our federal public lands without first disclosing the constituents of the lethal fracking fluid, they intend to inject into our purple mountains' majesty and amber waves of grain.
Later that week, AP reporters documented how the frack industry was using its clout to escape, not just the laws of government, but of science. On Thursday, AP's investigators forced the U.S. EPA to admit that it had withheld - for nearly a month - a devastating study showing groundwater contamination linked to fracking from oil and gas wells in Pavillion, Wyoming. At the command of Wyoming's republican Governor Matt Mead - an indentured servant to the fracking industry - the EPA delayed issuing the report. Mead then ordered state officials to "take a hard line" on the industry's behalf. A team of tobacco scientists and biostitutes at Wyoming's Department of Environmental Quality next dutifully used the delay to gin up critical questions meant to debunk EPA's science to help soften the blow from the federal study that sent shock waves through the oil and gas industry.
Law-abiding gas patch residents like the citizens of Dish, Texas understand something that Congressional Republicans apparently don't - environmental crime is real crime with real victims. Pollution doesn't just attack water and wildlife and put fishermen out of work. It harms human health, private property and often takes human life. Oil pollution damages the brains of little children and kills both young people and adults. Emissions from burning oil and coal kills tens of thousands Americans annually from cancer and respiratory illnesses, and impose half a trillion dollars in health care damage.
Oil and coal's other costs include global warming, acid rain, mercury contamination and ocean acidification. The carbon cronies have demonstrated an uncanny talent for writing loopholes and exemptions into health, safety and environmental laws to escape the consequences of damaging private property, public health, the shared commons and the welfare of the American people. When their lobbying and drafting tricks fail to give oil titans full protection, compliant enforcement and regulatory officials dull the sting of noncompliance. It's no wonder that frightened gas field communities seek assurance that government regulators will enforce the anemic laws that still exist to protect them. In the southern gulf states, Armendariz was respected by coastal communities as one of the few public officials who had not been corrupted by Big Oil. In that sense, Armendariz is an American hero in the mold of Eliott Ness, Pat Garrett, Wyatt Earp and Thomas Dewey.
Unfortunately, most of our political leaders lack Dr. Al's courage and integrity. Instead of protecting America's citizenry from oil industry atrocities, Senator Inhofe and the republicans see their job as protecting oil company brigands from the law and its enforcers. Inhofe's reasoning is not obscure, the oil and gas industry pumps hundreds of millions of dollars annually into elections and lobbying to purchase friends like Senator Inhofe. Big Oil is now the richest industry in history. Last year, Exxon contributed $54 million to the political process. The gravities of this lucre are irresistible to politicians of a certain stripe. Exxon's record quarterly profits of $104 million per day will allow that company to dramatically increase its political investments. More importantly, the Supreme Court's Citizens United case removes all the past restrictions that once deterred Big Oil from employing these enormous profits to completely dominate America's political system. As a result of that court ruling, the oil barons will pick the winners and losers in America's upcoming elections at every level - in secret if they desire.
The industry is already poised to flood America's political landscapes with hundreds of millions of dollars in newly legalized bribery. In addition to their generous contribution to the Tea Party, CATO Institute and other oil industry front groups, and oil tycoons Charles and David Koch, on Feb. 3 pledged an extra $60 million of their private money for direct campaign donations to ensure that their oil friendly candidate wins the presidential election in November.
Chevron, Exxon, the American Petroleum Institute and other oil moguls will match the Koch brothers' largesse many times over. The oil barons must find great comfort in historic data assembled by the Center for Responsive Politics demonstrating that, in 94% of American elections, the candidate with the most money wins. It was the underlying idealism of our successful experiment with self-government that made America an exemplary nation and the template for the world's democracies. If American democracy is to survive, we clearly need to restore integrity and representative democracy to our electoral process and get control of an industry that is using its enormous financial power to enrich itself, destroy the planet and undermine everything we value. Last week's events are merely a foreshadowing of the devolution that is inexorably propelling us toward a corrupt venal and petro kleptocracy.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Is there some answer for me?
The demand has to be for massive investment in clean energy mass transit systems across the country.
As for the Birmingham bus boycott; one of the reasons it was so effiective is that a) african americans organized their own CARpools and so they drove each other to work (often borrowing cars that were loaned to the movement precisely for this purpose by those that owned a vehicle) and b) white women began to drive their nannies, house keepers etc., because they couldn't function without their "negro help". So, in fact, cars played a crucial role in the bus boycott's success.
If he needs to be on Charlie Rose in Washington DC on Monday, and in LA for a conference on Tuesday, what's he supposed to do, walk?
He's not doing this for the money, Tommy, he could be enjoying a life-long, permanent vacation instead of working his ass off, so why don't you show a little gratitude instead of your petulant carping?
If he needs to be on Charlie Rose in Washington DC on Monday, and in LA for a conference on Tuesday, what's he supposed to do, walk?
]He could use POLYCOM! to virtually BE on CHarlie Rose!
While, i agree that the criticism of RK is unfair in this case (and i agree with you that he has been a real champion of environmental issues for decades), I think Midwest Tom raises a valid point that should not simply be ridiculed...e.g ., I am sick and tired of those such as Bono who come out as champions of the poor or the environment but then completely contradict their words with their actions (e.g., Bono's call for an end to 3rd world debt while moving most of his money out of his own country to avoid "high" Irish tax rates or talking about global warming while mounting tours for U2 that use so much fossil fuel (both electricity, jet fuel and gasoline) simply to make them "spectacles." There is nothing wrong with trying to hold those accountable who are in effect trying to tell the rest of us how we should lead our lives.
At the same time, I see nothing wrong with skipping Charlie Rose (no big loss there) altogether or at the very least appearing via streaming video from whereever
If Bono donned a pair of overalls and toiled in the fields for humanity, giving all his tax money to Ireland (so it can impose counterproducti ve austerity measures), canceling all his tours, then Bono would no longer have a world-stage voice to use to champion ANY issue.
YOU'RE sick of Bono? I'M sick of people sitting at home carping about activist celebrities who are at least doing SOMETHING; I'M sick of people bitching that these celebrities (who are actually making a difference!) don't live like ascetic monks. The perfect is the enemy of the good — if you're looking for the perfect champion, you're incredibly naive. Ralph Nader is the closest thing to it and in the wake of his blind zeal for ideological purity, we ended up with W. Bush and the right-wing Supreme Court.
Exactly what is your point here, other than to just complain?
We need to take a stand and demand vehicles that don't waste fuel. It is simple, yet contrived, mathematics: cars are designed to waste fuel, oil companies make billions an hour, and we are stupid.
This type of predator / sucker economy (where big oil is the predator and we are the suckers) should be abolished, and the oil companies and the politicians they control should all go to prison for the rest of their lives.
Hah! that'll be the day. Americans just love Pharaoh-and-his -people economics.
People need mobility, not some nozzle-head with his had in our pocket every 200 miles.
But you guys will pay all you have without blinking and think it's your fault.
We are so dependent on oil that our whole economy could collapse if one day we didn't have oil. This is so horrible because that means that all of these wars in the Mid East happen because our existence depends on their oil. So millions of people over there are dying and being sacrificed so that we can eat and get around in our gas guzzling cars and trucks. There is something seriously wrong with this country!
Keep telling the truth because "truth is our witness." -W.Eugene Smith Keep fighting.
These fuel-based economies thrive like a cancer with vehicles designed to waste fuel, and buyers blaming themselves. Until we demand vehicles that don't waste fuel, we are helpless pawns in their fascist murderous domain.
Fuel should be free, and the oil companies and the politicians they own should all go to prison for life, and should give back all the money they took from us over the decades of 'okay, we'll pay more'
I have also come to realize that the mainline environmental groups have a "conspircy of silence" against addressing fossil fuel conservation every bit as firm as the better-understo od conspiracy of silence as to population. The mainline groups always speak in terms of "efficiency" and "alternative energy cources," knowing full well that these goals cannot result in reduction of CO2 emissions in a timely manner. That leaves the public only with a recourse they have never been educated to understand to be necessary - radical reduction of fossil fuel consumption on the personal level, BY EVERYONE, which sumultaneously makes real gains against global warming and liberates the public from the hold of the corporations. I have been writing extensively on these subjects on the Internet, and one of my better known articles predicted in 2010 that the US would be facing a 4-plus % reduction in oil supplies by 2012. Petroleum Economist Magazine reported a week ago that a 4.5%/yr drop in US supply AND DEMAND has commenced. We need your help.
US public boycotts of oil to the tune of anytning more than 4.5%/yr would bring the industry to its knees and also make real gains for the first time in the global warming fight.
An independent government would enact policies that moved the entire nation away from dependence on fossil fuels. We all know the solutions. They are very many in nature. more public transportation where it makes sense and alternative fuels in every sector. Fracking and oil shale recovery should simply be banned as destructive technologies. Speculation on energy commodities should be banned as it only drives up the price of oil, gas, and other energies.
I just don't see any of this happening. Someday, the oil plutocracy will collapse of its own corruption and greed. but it will not change its course.
Oil is not just meant for gasoline. Oil is used in almost every aspect of manufacturing, greasing, road construction, road repair, and so forth, and is the basis for hundreds, maybe thousands, of products. Think plastics and similar.
Eliminating gas guzzling cars will not stop the industry. They are invested in much of technology, and therefore will continue as long as there is any possibility of extracting that oil.
America needs to consider doing the same. If the federal government can't do it, then smaller companies and groups should consider alternatives. In Iranian cities, people stand by the side of the road and taxis slow, you call out and if they're going in your direction you hop in and pay a small sum. It's fun and practical.
Oh my gosh, did I say Iran....? And 'socialist'? This must make me a suspect for something.
John P
Too bad RFK Jr is still a partisan hack for the DemoRats and won't equally lay the blame. It would be good for him to point out that The DemoRats are not on our side either!
This article hides more than it shows! The word Democrat was not mentioned ONE TIME. It reads like Vote for Democrats if you want to stop Fracking and that is a frigging laugh. Jr mentions cowed department officials, again, who is in Charge of the EPA and the Dept of the Interior? Where does the buck actually stop? It stops At the Top! It at least is scrutinized by a Democrat Administration, RFK Jr can not even allude to this.
He should include both Major Parties in his criticism and, especially in this article, he does not! He does a Disservice to the casual reader and a service for the DemoRat Party and that is subterfuge in my opinion.
RSS feed for comments to this post