RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Congratulations, Second Presidential Debate: You Nearly Discussed Climate Change! Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=33520"><span class="small">Erik Wemple, The Washington Post</span></a>   
Monday, 10 October 2016 08:28

Wemple writes: "Climate change, the issue on which future civilization hinges, had a slim chance of securing some representation in the 100-minute proceedings. Especially when you add in Trump's bullying."

Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. (photo: AP)
Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. (photo: AP)


Congratulations, Second Presidential Debate: You Nearly Discussed Climate Change!

By Erik Wemple, The Washington Post

10 October 16

 

e knew that Donald Trump’s now-famous boast that a guy like him could simply “grab” women by the “p—y” would occupy an early chunk of tonight’s second presidential debate between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. We knew, too, that Trump’s taxes would get a close look. For that matter, Clinton was due to give an accounting of her email scandal.

All of which left climate change, the issue on which future civilization hinges, with a slim chance of securing some representation in the 100-minute proceedings. Especially when you add in Trump’s bullying. Toward the end there, however, a guy named Ken stood up and posed this inquiry:

What steps will your energy policy take to meet our energy needs, while at the same time remaining environmentally friendly and minimizing job loss for fossil power plant workers?

Was that a climate change question? Of course not. Here’s a climate change question:

“As president, What are the steps you will take to address climate change?” As it turns out, that was the fourth-most popular question submitted to the Open Debate Coalition, behind questions about background checks for gun sales, the Second Amendment and Social Security.

In any case, Trump answered the question first and focused on how the Environmental Protection Agency is killing the energy industry. Clinton came with something of a curveball, saying that China is illegally dumping steel in the United States and that Trump is using it to build his properties. She did, however, manage to mouth two words that didn’t get uttered at any other point all night: “So I have a comprehensive energy policy, but it really does include fighting climate change, because I think that is a serious problem.”

Bolding added to highlight the revelation that this term was mentioned in a debate. And that’s about it. Via transcript search, that’s precisely the third mention of “climate change” in this general election debate season; Clinton brought up the topic briefly in the first debate, when she alleged that Trump sees climate change as a Chinese hoax, and Democratic vice-presidential candidate Tim Kaine made a glancing mention last week in his face-off against Mike Pence.

So this was a cruel tease. It would be one thing if the primary debates had thoroughly tested the candidates on this pressing matter. They didn’t, as this blog noted back in February. Though a student one year ago at a CNN Democratic primary debate posed a good climate change question, other iterations were weak-kneed and failed to provoke a deep discussion of a problem that affects water, land, air, animals, humans — everything. As my colleague Greg Sargent noted a while back, here’s one policy area where the two candidates have contrasting views: Trump, “hoax”; Clinton, “defining challenge of our time.” Accordingly, a straight up question on the matter might just come alive around the podiums.

Media criticism of the debates tends to focus on what’s in front of us. On Sunday night, some were piling on debate co-moderator Martha Raddatz for jousting with Trump. True to his whining form, Trump himself at one point complained about the moderators, saying it was a 3-on-1 situation, with Raddatz, co-moderator Anderson Cooper and Clinton teaming up against him. Last week, CBS News’s Elaine Quijano sustained criticism for not letting the candidates hash things out, as she frequently interrupted so as to get all her issues addressed. And before that, NBC News’s Lester Holt supposedly didn’t insert himself sufficiently into the proceedings.

Whatever to all of that. Here’s a case of the most critical sort of media bias — bias against a complex and important issue that involves science, hard-to-check facts and every living organism.

Update:


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Wishful Thinking: First Hundred Days After November 8 Print
Sunday, 09 October 2016 13:53

Reich writes: "1. Hillary Clinton is elected President. 2. Democrats take over the Senate, and reduce the Republican margin in the House to just 3 votes."

Robert Reich. (photo: unknown)
Robert Reich. (photo: unknown)


Wishful Thinking: First Hundred Days After November 8

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

09 October 16

 

1. Hillary Clinton is elected President.

2. Democrats take over the Senate, and reduce the Republican margin in the House to just 3 votes.

3. Elizabeth Warren announces she’ll challenge Hillary in the 2020 Democratic primaries if Hillary isn’t sufficiently progressive and bold during her first term.

4. The Democratic National Committee issues new rules eliminating “superdelegates” and requiring open primaries.

5. In her inaugural address, Hillary Clinton promises to “wrest back control of our democracy and economy from the moneyed interests that have taken over both.”

6. President Hillary Clinton nominates Barack Obama to the Supreme Court, who immediately pledges to reverse “Citizens United.” Senate Democrats make a rule change that allows Obama to be confirmed with 51 Senate votes. He is.

7. President Clinton nominates Bernie Sanders for Treasury Secretary and Michelle Obama for Attorney General. Both are immediately confirmed.

8. The chairman of the Republican Party officially repudiates Donald Trump, saying “shame on us for having nominated him.” Mitch McConnell, Newt Gingrich, Rudy Giuliani, and Mike Pence appear in a joint news conference in which they apologize for having ever supported Trump.

9. Disgraced and with his brand in tatters, the value of Trump’s properties drops 80 percent. His creditors demand that his personal assets – homes, planes, furniture, all he possesses – be liquidated to pay his bills.

10. Rupert Murdoch fires Sean Hannity from Fox News.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
'Call Me a Racist, but Don't Say I'm a Buddhist': Meet America's Alt Right Print
Sunday, 09 October 2016 13:47

Bhattacharya writes: "Between them they represent two poles of a racist spectrum, young and old. And judging from this lunch, it's the millennials who are the more extreme."

'We're everywhere! We're the guy next to you at yoga, the barista at the coffee store.': Eric at home in Manhattan Beach, LA. (photo: Barry J. Holmes/The Observer)
'We're everywhere! We're the guy next to you at yoga, the barista at the coffee store.': Eric at home in Manhattan Beach, LA. (photo: Barry J. Holmes/The Observer)


'Call Me a Racist, but Don't Say I'm a Buddhist': Meet America's Alt Right

By Sanjiv Bhattacharya, Guardian UK

09 October 16

 

very few weeks, William Johnson, the chairman of the white nationalist American Freedom Party (AFP), holds a lunch for members, the goal being to make America a white ethnostate, a project that begins with electing Donald Trump. This week, it’s at a grand old French restaurant called Taix, in Echo Park, Los Angeles – an odd choice on the face of it. Echo Park is a trendy hood. It’s hipster and heavily Hispanic. In fact, given the predominance of Latino kitchen staff in this city, it may be wise to hold off on the Trump talk until the food arrives.

“About three months ago,” Johnson begins, “I was talking to Richard Spencer about how we need to plan for a Trump victory.” Spencer is another prominent white nationalist – he heads the generic-sounding National Policy Institute. “I said: ‘I want Jared Taylor [of American Renaissance] as UN Ambassador, and Kevin MacDonald [an evolutionary psychologist] as secretary of health and Ann Coulter as homeland security!’ And Spencer said: ‘Oh Johnson, that’s a pipe dream!’ But today, he’d no longer say that, because if Trump wins, all the establishment Republicans, they’re gone… They hate him! So who’s left? If we can lobby, we can put our people in there.”

Around the table five young men, roughly half Johnson’s age (he’s 61), nod and lean in. They all wear suits and ties, address the waiter as “sir” and identify as the “alt right”, the much-discussed nouvelle vague of racism. “Are you guys familiar with the Plum Book?” Johnson asks. “It’s plum because of the colour, but also because of the plum positions – there are 20,000 jobs in that book that are open to a new administration.”

“So we need to identify our top people!” says Eric, one of the men at the table.

“Just anyone with a college degree!” Johnson says.

“Right.” Eric is practically bouncing in his seat with excitement. “We need to get the word out. We are the new GOP!”

It’s not every day that a brown journalist gets to sit in on a white-nationalist strategy meeting. But these are strange times. Racism is trending. Like Brexit, Trump has normalised views that were once beyond the pale, and groups like the AFP have grown bold. Their man’s stubby orange fingers are within reach of actual power, so maybe it’s time to emerge from the shadows at last.

I first met Johnson in May after he signed up as a Trump delegate before being swiftly struck off by the campaign when the press found out. He’s a surprising figure. An avid environmentalist, fluent in Japanese and, in person, not the bitter old racist I’d expected but rather a jolly Mormon grandfather, bright eyed and chuckling, a Wind in the Willows character. Eric is even more unexpected. Tall and impassioned, he came to racism via hypnotherapy, of all things. He sells solar panels for a living and practises yoga. Together with his friends Matt and Nathan, who are also here at lunch, he runs an alt-right fraternity in Manhattan Beach – “a beer and barbecues thing”. They’re called the Beach Goys. “We’re starting a parody band,” he beams. “We’ve found a drummer!”

Between them they represent two poles of a racist spectrum, young and old. And judging from this lunch, it’s the millennials who are the more extreme. Johnson wants white nationalists to appear less mean and he finds the “JQ”, the Jewish Question, archaic. But Eric loves the meanness of the alt right. “We’re the troll army!” he says. “We’re here to win. We’re savage!” And antisemitism is non-negotiable. In fact, he’d like to clear up a misnomer about the alt right, propagated by the Breitbart columnist Milo Yiannopoulos, who is often described, mistakenly, as the movement’s leader. Milo casts the alt right as principally a trolling enterprise, dedicated to attacking liberal shibboleths for the “lulz”– there’s precious little actual bigotry. But Eric insists otherwise. Yes, they like to joke, they have memes, they’re just as funny as liberals – have I heard of their satirical news podcasts, the Daily Shoah and Fash the Nation? But make no mistake, the racism is real. Eric especially enjoys The Daily Stormer, a leading alt-right news site, which is unashamedly pro-Hitler.

What unites Johnson and Eric is what they describe as “the systematic browbeating of the white male” – namely all this talk of privilege, the Confederate flag, Black Lives Matter and mansplaining. But beyond that, it’s the “looming extinction of the white race”. This is the language they use. Also: “Diversity equals white genocide.” The alt right loves to evoke genocide while harbouring Holocaust deniers. Their point is that white people are melting away like the icecaps, and they have a primal drive to stop it. In 2044, non-Hispanic whites will drop below 50% of the US population. “The generation of the white minority has already been born,” Eric says. “Look at South Africa and Rhodesia. That’s where we’re headed. Total disenfranchisement.”

I want to reassure him that his Brown Rulers will be gentle and that slavery isn’t so bad when you get used to it. But it’s not me they want to hear from, it’s white people. This is the white nationalist’s burden – the very people they’re trying to save are the ones who most fiercely oppose them. “The only group I cannot get along with is white people,” says Johnson. “Because white people hate white people who like white people.”

A couple of days later, Johnson is at his cluttered desk in downtown LA, nattering merrily in Japanese to a woman in Tokyo. He gets lots of media requests these days, but especially from Japan. There’s an uncanny connection between Japan and white nationalism in America. Jared Taylor, white nationalism’s foremost intellectual, is another fluent speaker. “It’s an ethnostate and it’s deeply nationalist,” he says. “And they have resisted the pressure to admit refugees. I say: ‘God bless them!’”

For his part, Johnson’s racism was shaped in Japan. He grew up in Eugene, Oregon, a state founded as a white utopia, in a modest Mormon home, back before the LDS church gave black people the priesthood in 1978. But it was his two-year mission to Tohoku, Japan, that turned him. As he went from door to door, locals would opine on the greatness of white America. “They had an inferiority complex after the war, so we were treated like celebrities,” he says. “Oh, it was just the funnest time!” A few years later, while working in Japan as an attorney, he wrote a book advocating the repatriation of all non-whites with appropriate reparations, because “I thought America was going to collapse unless I did something.” When he returned to LA, he sent a copy to every congressman. He was 32.

Clearly things didn’t work out as planned. His forays into politics floundered and then his offices were bombed. So he retreated from activism for nearly 15 years, only returning in 2009 to form the AFP – just in time for the rise of the alt right.

We head to his 67-acre ranch near Pasadena, a hilly lot backing on to a national forest. I asked to meet his family, but his wife refused, so we tour the farm instead – his persimmon orchard, his horses and ducks. And there on his pick-up truck is a stencil of Jimi Hendrix. “My daughter likes to paint,” he says proudly. None of his five children are white nationalists, though they have promised to marry within the race.

“You’re a white supremacist with a black artist painted on your truck,” I tell him. And he flinches. “That’s the meanest, most hurtful swearword there is. Just because I say different races have different strengths doesn’t mean I think I’m superior.” He doesn’t like “racist” either. “It’s a pejorative. I prefer ‘race realist’.”

“But it’s not my reality, Bill. I’m sticking with racist.”

“Well, OK. But people who embrace ‘racist’ are mad at everybody. I get along with people. You cannot function in Los Angeles without encountering other races, so I look for areas of similarity and agreement. It’s important to treat everyone with the highest respect on a micro level.”

On a macro level, however, darkness falls – multiculturalism is doomed, the different races will never get along, and our only hope is Balkanisation: separate territories for separate tribes. And whatever accelerates that transition is welcome, even racial strife. “I don’t think friction is a good thing,” he says, “but it would help facilitate the split that is necessary.”

We stop to feed his alpacas. There’s a brown one, a black one and a white one, standing peacefully together against the chicken wire fence.

“See Bill, they’re getting along.”

He laughs. “I wish people were like alpacas.”

I’m with Eric at a Mexican restaurant in Manhattan Beach where he lives, an upscale, white neighbourhood in the South Bay. He clears space on the table and grins. “OK, you ready? Your first tarot card reading with the Hitler Youth!”

It’s been an odd afternoon. We walked along the beach and I asked about his gmail address which includes the number 1488, a potent number for white supremacists. The “14” stands for the 14 words coined by the late David Lane of the group The Order: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.” And the 88 refers to HH (H being eighth in the alphabet) – or Heil Hitler. Eric sighed. “OK, but this stuff’s hard to talk about,” he said. “It depends how red-pilled you are.”

Alt-righters love talking about the red pill. It’s a reference to The Matrix – blue-pilled people bumble through a life of illusion, while the red-pilled have seen the truth and there’s no turning back. Like all conspiracy theorists they see the hidden hand that guides all things, but for the alt right that hand is Jewish. The red pill is classic antisemitism, rebooted for a younger generation. As we walked, he laid it out – the banking, the media, the globalism. We passed games of beach volleyball and family picnics, while he explained why the Holocaust was exaggerated and Hitler got a bad rap.

“Have you noticed that kombucha isn’t as fizzy as it used to be?” he asks, along the way, because Eric isn’t your average Nazi. He trained as a spiritualist. He has taught meditation. He brought his tarot cards in case I wanted a reading.

“Don’t tell me – it’s the Jews,” I tell him. He laughs. “You said it, not me!”

In the late 70s, the Klansman David Duke swapped his hood and robes for a suit and tie, and took white supremacy out of the cross-burning fields and into the boardroom. Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center describes the alt right in similar terms, as Racism 2.0, “a rebranding for the digital generation”. It’s a trendy reboot – “alt right” makes white supremacy sound like an art collective. And Eric, the kombucha Nazi, just takes it a step further – into the aisles of Whole Foods. He’s a locally sourced, wild-caught bigot high in omega-3s and antisemitism. It makes him more sinister in some ways, and more harmless in others. As Nazis go.

“Hmm, Nazi.” Like Johnson, he’s squeamish about terms. Warriors against political correctness can be awfully sensitive. “It’s such a slur,” he says. But come on – he’s a Hitler apologist. “OK, fine,” he says. “Just don’t say I’m a Buddhist, because I’m actually more into Norse and Celtic mysticism now.”

It’ll come as no surprise that someone who’d rather be called a Nazi than a Buddhist has a strange story to tell. Originally from a well-off white suburb of Chicago, he moved to Las Vegas to pursue music. Then one day, in the gym of his condo building, he met a guru figure we’ll call Frank. A spiritualist and businessman, Frank introduced Eric to New Age mysticism and Japanese Buddhism. And it was under Frank’s guidance that Eric moved to LA to study hypnotherapy and began a career giving readings and tarot shows at a psychic bookshop. Frank, he says, was his “mentor and best friend”. But then Eric took a turn. He radicalised himself. He left the New Age life, finding it too feminine, and spiralled down a sinkhole of conspiracy theory. He and Frank have been estranged ever since. Frank is black.

Today, Eric still meditates and practises yoga. His weeks are spent like David Brent, as a travelling salesman, driving around meeting his solar energy clients. His weekends, however, are all about the Beach Goys, which now has 15 members. Last week, they went on a hike to the Murphy Ranch in the Pacific Palisades, a decrepit old property that was originally built as a refuge for Hitler after the war. Next week is their first band rehearsal. Eric’s going to play guitar and sing. And this is the future he wants – not a plum job with the Trump administration. “I don’t see myself as a bureaucrat,” he says. “I want to take the Beach Goys national. I want to inspire people.”

It could happen. Trump has unleashed something in America. Johnson won’t reveal the AFP’s membership numbers – “Maybe we want to appear bigger than we are?” – but Eric insists the alt right is on the march. “We’re growing with every hashtag, every BLM protest, every city that becomes a Detroit, or a London,” he says. “We’re everywhere! We’re the guy next to you at yoga, the barista at Starbucks...” It’s like Fight Club for supremacists, a deeply unsettling thought (which is why Eric loves it).

But his delight in being a secret Nazi detracts from the seriousness of it all, the white genocide stuff. He’s having too much fun. And I wonder, as we finish our beers, if it will pass for Eric, this Nazi phase. He just doesn’t seem that threatening. Then he starts up about a race war, that old white-supremacist chestnut. Because behind the trolling veneer, the alt right is more traditional than alt. What Eric believes is vintage racism, the same old wine in a new ironic cask. And Tony Benn’s words ring as true as ever: “Every generation must fight the same battles again and again.”

“Our civilisation is at war and we need to secure our people,” Eric says. “We must seize power and take control. And the idea that we can do this peacefully is probably not realistic.”

We get along well enough, Eric and I, but he has the same micro/macro discrepancy as Johnson. And at a macro level, there is only despair and division. “I do not advocate violence, but I will give my life for my blood… and for the honour of my ancestors.”

He thrums the tarot cards in his hands, his voice getting more animated. “We accept the game that’s being played. We accept that the lion and the gazelle are competition. But they don’t have to hate each other. That’s just how we view it.”

He shrugs. “It’s scary. The world is scary. This is not a game for children.”


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: A Government Is Seizing Control of Our Election Process, and It Is Not the Russians Print
Sunday, 09 October 2016 11:28

Van Buren writes: "There is an attempt underway for a government to take control of our election process and throw the election to Hillary Clinton. It is not the Russian government. Mark this day - it is when we came to understand that the American government decided to elect a president."

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton checks her phone on October 18, 2011. (photo: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton checks her phone on October 18, 2011. (photo: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)


A Government Is Seizing Control of Our Election Process, and It Is Not the Russians

By Peter Van Buren, We Meant Well

09 October 16

 

here is an attempt underway for a government to take control of our election process and throw the election to Hillary Clinton. It is not the Russian government. Mark this day it is when we came to understand that the American government decided to elect a president.

(Note: I understand in the minds of the mass media the most important issue in America today is Trump’s crude remarks, but there are indeed real things to be concerned about otherwise.)

Here’s how:

  • Two days before the second presidential debate, the government of the United States officially accused Russia of a hacking campaign aimed at interfering in the U.S. election. In a joint statement, absent any specifics or technical details, the Department of Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence stated “the recent [hacked email] disclosures… are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts… based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.”

  • The statement goes on to detail how only Democratic servers were attacked, meaning the American government is claiming that Russia is trying to throw the election to Donald Trump, plain and simple. It is left unsaid why the Russians would risk cyberwar with the United States to do this, as many have suggested Trump is a neocon in spirit whose loose finger will be on the nuclear button from day one. Clinton is much more of a political realist, comfortable with the business-as-usual of the past eight years that has gone in Russia’s favor in the Ukraine and Syria. She in fact seems like the stable known known, always a preference.

  • Though the first “Russian” hacks were reported in July, it is only 48 hours before the second presidential debate that the statement was released. It could easily have been held until Monday, there is no national security urgency for this to come out Friday. However, with the timing, Trump, essentially tied with Clinton in the polls, will now spend much of the debate defending himself. Since the statement includes no details, only accusations, it is hard to see how anyone could defend themselves. It would be near-impossible for Trump to come out ahead Sunday night; this is a near-coup.

  • Despite the certainty with which the U.S. government has accused Russia of trying to influence the election by hacking into secured email servers, the FBI maintains there is no evidence the Russians or anyone else accessed Clinton unsecured, unencrypted email server laden with actual classified materials, including during Clinton’s first trip to Moscow when she sent and received encrypted email over the Internet and WiFi.

  • In the first presidential debate, Hillary Clinton broadly speculated that Donald Trump had paid no taxes. Days later, several pages of Trump’s tax returns, documents that had been sought unsuccessfully by the media for over a year, arrive at the New York Times, who front pages a story. In the Vice Presidential debate which followed, Trump’s running mate spent time on the defensive defending his boss’ deductions.

  • Clinton sent and received classified material on an unsecured, classified server. That violated the most basic rule of information security. She lied about it. She deleted emails and “lost” both the majority of her devices and many, many emails. The FBI and the Department of Justice, ahead of the Democratic nominating convention, found she violated no law. The Department of Justice granted broad immunity to key Clinton staffers, and allowed two of them to destroy their devices. No further investigation will thus be possible.

  • The State Department aided and abetted Clinton for over four years in hiding her private server, and avoiding her responsibilities under the Freedom of Information Act and the Federal Records Act. Only under court order has the Department stopped slow-walking its “review” process to release emails publically. There has been no investigation.

  • Emails released show a tangle of interests among State Department decisions, the Clinton Foundation and access to Hillary as Secretary of State (“pay for play”). Clinton sought Pentagon and State Department contracts for Chelsea’s friend. There has been no investigation.

  • The State Department and White House coordinated to “crush” Clinton’s email coverage.

If you can add it up any other way than direct interference by the White House, the State Department, the Department of Justice, the FBI and the intelligence community, it would be interesting to hear how that works. The comments are open to make a benign case for these actions.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: Let Me Get This Straight Print
Sunday, 09 October 2016 10:50

Cory writes: "Donald Trump says Mexicans are mostly rapists and criminals and an America judge of Mexican heritage cannot render a fair verdict regarding Trump because of that Mexican heritage - and the GOP says, 'We support Donald Trump.'"

Donald Trump. (photo: Nigel Parry/CNN)
Donald Trump. (photo: Nigel Parry/CNN)


Let Me Get This Straight

By John Cory, Reader Supported News

09 October 16

 

onald Trump says Mexicans are mostly rapists and criminals and an American judge of Mexican heritage cannot render a fair verdict regarding Trump because of that Mexican heritage – and the GOP says, “We support Donald Trump.”

Donald Trump insults a reporter with a disability, insults a Gold Star family, wants to ban all Muslims from America, calls Rosie O’Donnell a pig and says she deserves the name calling, calls a former Miss Universe “Miss Piggy” and an “eating-machine” and then says she should be grateful to him for saving her job – and the GOP says, “We support Donald Trump.”

Donald Trump says the Central Park Five are guilty. Period. They confessed and there is lots of evidence that they are guilty – even though they have been proven innocent by DNA evidence, wrongly convicted and sent to jail – and the GOP says, “We support Donald Trump.”

Donald Trump says let Korea, Saudi Arabia, Japan, and anyone else who wants a nuclear weapon have a nuclear weapon. Except Iran. And if Iranian sailors flip the bird at American war ships, he’ll blow them out of the water. Fast! And he’ll dissolve NATO and any other organizations that don’t pay their own way. Fast! – And the GOP says, “We support Donald Trump.”

Donald Trump said this is all a distraction and it happened 11 years ago and he’s a changed man – but over 20 years ago a guy who is not running for president did something bad, and that’s worse than what Donald did because – Donald says so.

Kelly Ayotte called Trump a role model. Joe Heck in Nevada has said Trump is a straight shooter and just what America needs. Don King said Trump is almost “the greatest.” Paul Ryan will vote for Trump. Ted Cruz will vote for Trump. Mitch McConnell will vote for Trump.

So let me get this straight:

Donald Trump’s racism, bigotry, misogyny, sexism, hate speech, and threatening to blow up the world – is just fine with the GOP.

BUT –

Donald Trump saying “pussy” is suddenly a bridge too far for the GOP fainting couch crowd?

Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell will still vote for Trump?

Does reeking hypocrisy come before or after GOP in the dictionary?



Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 Next > End >>

Page 1873 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN