FOCUS: CIA Whistleblower Jeffrey Sterling Placed in Solitary Confinement
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=36478"><span class="small">John Kiriakou, Reader Supported News</span></a>
Tuesday, 02 May 2017 10:36
Kiriakou writes: "Incarcerated CIA whistleblower Jeffrey Sterling was recently sent to solitary confinement on a bogus and trumped-up charge of threatening a corrections officer."
Jeffrey Sterling. (photo: AP)
CIA Whistleblower Jeffrey Sterling Placed in Solitary Confinement
By John Kiriakou, Reader Supported News
02 May 17
ncarcerated CIA whistleblower Jeffrey Sterling was recently sent to solitary confinement on a bogus and trumped-up charge of threatening a corrections officer (CO). According to Jeffrey’s wife, Holly, and a formal complaint that Jeffrey lodged with Bureau of Prisons regional authorities in Colorado, Jeffrey was standing at attention on April 21 for the daily 4:15 count, where all prisoners must stand and be counted, when the situation unfolded quickly.
The following is Jeffrey’s personal account of what transpired. It is edited lightly only for clarity:
“On April 21, 2017, at approximately 4:30 pm, a bed-book count was called during routine count time (daily at 4:15 pm). The north side of the range was called first.” [Author’s note: A bed-book count is when a CO uses a book with names, registration numbers, and photographs of each prisoner to do a comprehensive count. This is an unusual occurrence. I went through only two bed-book counts in my 23 months in prison.]
“My cell is on the south side of the range. Prior to my side being called, I noticed that CO ‘Richard’ [pseudonyms are used here to protect Jeffrey from further retaliation from prison authorities] was walking ahead of the two COs actually conducting the bed-book count. I had never seen the bed-book count conducted in this manner with a CO counting ahead of those actually performing the count.
“Richard, walking ahead of the two COs completing the count, passed directly in front of me. He suddenly stopped and returned to where I was standing for count. He stated that I had messed up his count because I was not standing out far enough and he asked me to move. Upon his request, I stepped out farther, not saying a word. Richard then threatened me with physical violence by stating, ‘Do you want to go? Let’s go. You’re here, so you’re not so tough.’
“I responded to his question/statement by stating that I had stepped forward as requested. Richard repeated the threats of physical violence. I asked if he was threatening me and I asked his name. I was unable to see his name displayed on his shirt because he was wearing what appeared to be a hoodie. Richard did not respond.
“The COs conducting the bed-book count had reached my cell and I provided the requested name and registration number. After count for the range was cleared, I calmly approached Richard as he was exiting and stated that I was merely asking for his name. He did not answer, but stated that I was on ‘Special Time.’ He did not explain what Special Time was. I returned to my cell.”
Jeffrey then says that Richard returned to his cell with another CO and said something about needing him to go with them to “finish this.” Jeffrey writes, “Based on Richard’s threats, and [because] staff at FCI Englewood have completely disregarded that I was threatened with physical violence by a staff member, I am in fear for my safety.
“I responded that he threatened me and that I preferred to speak with a lieutenant. I also explained that I was waiting until general count was cleared to go down to do so. I offered that we could go see the Lieutenant together. He threatened me with a ‘shot’ [a disciplinary infraction] and stated that he’d been doing this for 11 years. I again requested to speak to the Lieutenant. Richard and the other officer left.
“A few minutes later, Richard returned with a different CO. That CO motioned for me to come out of my cell. I stood and said that I had requested to speak with a Lieutenant. The CO responded that ‘no’ was not an option. I put up no resistance and headed for the exit with Richard and the CO behind me. I did not know if I was going to speak with a Lieutenant.
“I entered the ‘compound shack’ where the Lieutenant’s office is located. Richard and the other CO remained behind me as I entered. The foyer area was dark and I did not see a Lieutenant. Neither Richard nor the other CO motioned for me to head to the left hallway where the Lieutenant’s office is located.
“At this point, I again feared for my safety. I once again asked to speak with the Lieutenant. Still behind me, Richard stated, ‘that’s it’ and ordered me to put my hands up against the wall. I was handcuffed and then taken to the Special Housing Unit [SHU].
“The only time I saw a Lieutenant was when ‘Lt. Tatum’ came to my cell to hand me the incident report. Lt. Tatum read me my rights (that I had a right to remain silent and that anything I said could be used against me). After reading the report, I stated that what Richard [reported] was not true. I recounted the events for the Lieutenant, including the threats of physical violence that Richard made. I also stated that I had requested to speak to a Lieutenant several times. I remained in the SHU over the weekend.”
Jeffrey was released from solitary confinement after two-and-a-half days. He was denied medication for his heart condition there, just as he has been for the past six months. And upon his release from the SHU, his telephone and commissary privileges were suspended for 30 days.
This kind of petty harassment is typical, not just for Jeffrey, but for any high-profile prisoner. Barrett Brown was just sent back to prison because he allegedly neglected to ask for permission to speak to a PBS reporter. I was repeatedly threatened with solitary confinement for publishing a blog series from prison. The list goes on.
The shame of the situation is that there is no recourse. Jeffrey Sterling was wronged. He was bullied. His health was jeopardized when he was not given his medication. And there’s nothing he can do about it. Sure, he is appealing to the BOP’s regional office. But the regional office has, technically, 30 days to respond to his complaint. What they normally do it wait months to respond, and then backdate the response to the 30-day mark.
Jeffrey is coming home sometime in the late fall or early winter. In the meantime, we can let the prison administration know that we’re watching them and that we’re concerned and angry about Jeffrey’s treatment. We can complain to Warden Rene Garcia at 303-763-4300 and demand respect for a patriot and whistleblower. Please do it right now.
John Kiriakou is a former CIA counterterrorism officer and a former senior investigator with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. John became the sixth whistleblower indicted by the Obama administration under the Espionage Act – a law designed to punish spies. He served 23 months in prison as a result of his attempts to oppose the Bush administration's torture program.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.
Eight Ways Trump Got Rolled in His First Budget Negotiation
Tuesday, 02 May 2017 08:10
Excerpt: "The White House agreed to punt on a lot of the president's top priorities until this fall to avert a shutdown on Friday and to clear the deck so that the House can pass a health-care bill."
President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., January 23, 2017. (photo: Saul Loeb/Getty Images)
Eight Ways Trump Got Rolled in His First Budget Negotiation
By James Hohmann and Breanne Deppisch, The Washington Post
02 May 17
HE BIG IDEA: Perhaps the best negotiators are not the people who tell everyone that they are the best negotiators.
A spending agreement was reached last night that will keep the government funded through the end of September. This will be the first significant bipartisan measure passed by Congress since Donald Trump took office.
-- The White House agreed to punt on a lot of the president’s top priorities until this fall to avert a shutdown on Friday and to clear the deck so that the House can pass a health-care bill. “This is going to be a great week,” Gary Cohn, Trump’s chief economic adviser, said on CBS this morning. “We're going to get health care down to the floor of the House. We're convinced we've got the votes, and we're going to keep moving on with our agenda.”
-- But Democrats are surprised by just how many concessions they extracted in the trillion-dollar deal, considering that Republicans have unified control of government.
Trump’s longtime lawyer Michael Cohen bragged during the campaign: “He’s an amazing negotiator, probably the best in this world.”
On Sunday, the president acknowledged he has a lot to learn. “I think the rules in Congress and, in particular the rules in the Senate, are unbelievably archaic and slow moving and, in many cases, unfair,” Trump said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “In many cases, you're forced to make deals that are not the deal you'd make. You'd make a much different kind of a deal. You're forced into situations that you hate to be forced into.”
-- Now that the language has posted, here are the eight most notable areas Trump caved in his first big spending negotiation:
1. There are explicit restrictions to block the border wall. We knew last week there would be no money to start construction on a project that the president says is more important to his base than anything else. But the final agreement goes further, putting strict limitations on how Trump can use new money for border security (e.g. to invest in new technology and repair existing fencing). Administration officials have insisted they already have the statutory authority to start building the wall under a 2006 law. This prevents such an end run.
The $1.5 billion for border security is also half as much as the White House requested. Additionally, there are no cuts in funding to sanctuary cities, something a federal judge said last week would be required for the Justice Department to follow through on its threats. And there is also no money for a deportation force.
2. Non-defense domestic spending will go up, despite the Trump team’s insistence he wouldn’t let that happen. The president called for $18 billion in cuts. Instead, he’s going to sign a budget with lots of sweeteners that grow the size of government. Mitch McConnell made sure $4.6 billion got put aside to permanently extend health benefits to 22,000 retired Appalachian coal miners and their families. Nancy Pelosi made sure $295 million was included to shore up Medicaid in Puerto Rico. Chuck Schumer got $61?million to reimburse local law enforcement agencies for the cost of protecting Trump when he travels to his residences in Florida and New York. There is also another $2 billion in disaster relief money for states, which bought a couple votes. (Kelsey Snell, our lead budget reporter, has more examples.)
3. Barack Obama’s cancer moonshot is generously funded. The administration asked to slash spending at the National Institutes of Health by $1.2 billion for the rest of this fiscal year. Instead, the NIH will get a $2 billion boost — on top of the huge increase it got last year. Republican appropriators who care about biomedical research, including Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) and Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), delivered.
Trump also failed in his efforts to cut money for other kinds of scientific inquiry. For example, he proposed defunding the Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy. Instead, it is getting a $15 million increase.
4. Trump fought to cut the Environmental Protection Agency by a third. The final deal trims its budget by just 1 percent, with no staff cuts. As part of a compromise, the EPA gets $80 million less than last year, but the budget is $8 billion.
5. He didn’t defund Planned Parenthood. Despite the best efforts of social conservatives, the group will continue to receive funding at current levels.
6.The president got less than half as much for the military as he said was necessary. Trump repeatedly prodded Congress to increase military spending by $30 billion. He’s getting $12.5 billion, with an additional $2.5 billion if/when he delivers a detailed plan on how to defeat the Islamic State. Many Democrats from states with bases and manufacturers, especially those up for reelection in 2018, wanted this, too. Like Trump, they will tout the increased spending as a victory. The White House plans to call this a down payment on a much bigger investment down the road.
7. Democrats say they forced Republicans to withdraw more than 160 riders. These unrelated policy measures, which each could have been a poison pill, would have done things like get rid of the fiduciary rule and water down environmental regulations. On the other side of the ledger, this budget blocks the Justice Department from restricting the dispensing of medical marijuana in states where it has been legalized.
8. To keep negotiations moving, the White House already agreed last week to continue paying Obamacare subsidies. This money, which goes to insurance companies, reduces out-of-pocket expenses for low-income people who get coverage under the Affordable Care Act. The Trump administration justifies giving up on this because of the potential to resolve the bigger issue by repealing Obamacare.
-- Soon after the deal was reached last night, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi quickly put out celebratory statements. But McConnell and Paul Ryan did not.
-- The lack of aggressive messaging from Republican leadership, and especially the White House, late Sunday is one of the reasons that coverage is so lopsidedly bad for them in this morning’s papers and on cable news. Here are 10 examples:
“Overall, the compromise resembles more of an Obama administration-era budget than a Trump one,” Bloomberg reports.
The Associated Press calls it “a lowest-common-denominator measure that won't look too much different than the deal that could have been struck on Obama's watch last year.”
Reuters: “While Republicans control the House, Senate and White House, Democrats scored … significant victories in the deal.”
The Los Angeles Times describes the agreement as “something of an embarrassment to the White House”: “Trump engineered the fiscal standoff shortly after he was elected, insisting late last year that Congress should fund the government for only a few months so he could put his stamp on federal spending as the new president.”
The headline on FoxNews.com is “Spending bill language omits border wall funding, sanctuary cities crackdown”: “It also rejects White House budget director Mick Mulvaney's proposals to cut popular programs such as funding medical research and community development grants.”
New York Times A1: “The deal should spare Republicans the embarrassment of seeing the government shut down on their watch. But it also gave a glimpse of the reluctance of lawmakers to bend to Mr. Trump’s spending priorities, like his desire for sharp cuts to domestic programs.”
“Congressional negotiators basically told the Trump administration to take a hike,” David Nather writes on Axios.
NPR says Democrats “flexed their leverage in spending negotiations.”
Vox: “Conservatives got almost nothing they wanted.”
-- The bigger picture: “Trump is a nightmare negotiating partner,” writes USA Today commentary editor Jill Lawrence, who wrote a book called “The Art of the Political Deal.” “The only constants with Trump are unpredictability and expediency. These are not, suffice it to say, the traditional cornerstones of getting to yes in politics.”
The First 100 Days of My Presidency Have Been Tremendous
Monday, 01 May 2017 13:42
Keillor writes: "My first 100 days as Numero Uno have been fantastically tremendous as we begin to make progress to clean up the mess that I inherited."
Garrison Keillor. (photo: WPR)
The First 100 Days of My Presidency Have Been Tremendous
By Garrison Keillor, The Washington Post
01 May 17
I've seen the salutes the helicopter Marines gave Obama and they were nothing like the ones I get.
y first 100 days as Numero Uno have been fantastically tremendous as we begin to make progress to clean up the mess that I inherited. Terrorism, crumbling infrastructure, public television (so boring), China, the war on coal, political correctness, people we have no idea who they are coming into this country, the whole deal. You’d never know this if you watch MSNBC or CNN, which – and we have proof of this – are owned by the man who owns The New York Times, Famous Ray’s Pizza, some check-cashing establishments, and that bunch of losers, the New York Knicks. Sad!
His name is Mr. Wong and he has had it in for me since I refused to sell him an apartment in my building because he cooks everything in fish oil and his very unpleasant journalists have ripped me since Day 1, which does not bother me in the slightest. They’re like an anthill in the Rose Garden. Stomp! Stomp! Bye-bye!
And he is very stupid. Very very stupid. His New York Times is written by robots run by a laptop computer in Toronto. We have photographs that will be released as soon as they are audited. These robots keep saying I’m unpopular, my White House is in chaos, I am guilty of conflict of interest, my intelligence briefings come in the form of flipbooks because I read at a fourth-grade level – FAKE NEWS! I read 1,000 words per minute, that’s why I flip the pages.
I love being POTUS. I love the security cordon around me. It means that nobody can walk up to me in the street and say, “Hey, Don, remember me? Studio 54?” Doesn’t happen. No sitting in a restaurant listening to some illegal foreign waiter reciting the specials in his unintelligible accent. I go where the food comes pronto, steak, well-done, served by an American born in America. And after dessert, no sitting around while people you hardly know reminisce about their childhood in Kansas or wherever. Who cares? I signal Secret Service with a finger in my right ear and I am Out Of There.
Wong lives in a very substandard 14th-floor penthouse on West 39th Street, not a desirable neighborhood, and the 14th floor is hardly a penthouse. More like a pigeon coop. Sirens day and night, helicopters flying tourists around. Now that I am president, no helicopter with their irritating whump-whump-whump can come within a half-mile of me unless it is a Marine helicopter and I am inside it. Wong uses Acme Car Service, I use the Secret Service. No comparison!
Wong owns two motels in West Palm Beach, the Wayfarer and the Beachcomber – you hear the toilet flush next door – no comparison to Mar-a-Lago. Every foreign leader who’s come to visit me there says it is “Number One” and “world class” – fresh fruit in every room, bottled water from Trump Springs, Egyptian sheets. Other places have sheets with an 800-thread count. Mine are 8,000. Only the best!
I don’t miss New York a bit. It’s a hellhole. People lying in doorways, sleeping on park benches, like Calcutta or something. You get stuck in traffic, bums knock on your window and people jaywalk in front of you.
Now this helicopter is at my service day and night with a young Marine in dress uniform by the steps, at attention, and gives me a tremendous salute. I’ve seen the salutes they gave Obama and they were nothing like the ones I get.
Tremendous respect. The military was hanging their heads before and now they’re holding their heads up, thanks to me.
I have tremendous respect for the military. Great people. I did not serve in the armed forces due to a painful foot injury that made it hard for me to stand at attention, but as a young man, I found that dating in Manhattan was like being in Vietnam. I went out with beautiful women, I was a soldier going over the hill, there was herpes around, crabs, syph, you name it.
If I were to start dating again, I have people who would subject those women to extreme vetting. No women from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria or Yemen. No vegans. All bags will be searched.
Remove your shoes. Golfers, go to the front of the line. I am 70 but I feel like 17. Wake up every morning with a big grin on my face. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just bitter about the election. So sad. Nyaa nyaa on you. I gotta go.
Sawant writes: "Let's seize the time and make this May Day a turning point in the struggle to bring down this dangerous administration and put forward the type of politics than can challenge the rule of the billionaire class."
Kshama Sawant. (photo: Deborah Wang)
Why We Should Strike on May Day
By Kshama Sawant, Jacobin
01 May 17
Socialist councilwoman Kshama Sawant on why we need a wave of protests and strikes on May 1.
ince Inauguration Day, millions of people have taken to the streets to fight against Donald Trump’s right-wing agenda. Yet the president is continuing his attacks.
In the last week alone more than six hundred immigrants have been rounded up by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Here in Seattle, the administration appears to be using their illegal detention of a twenty-three-year-old father, Daniel Ramirez Medina, as some sort of bigoted “test” of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
This is only a small taste of what’s likely to come with Trump promising to deport millions. ICE is likely at some stage to start full-scale workplace raids.
It will not be enough to play defense. As millions ask “what will it take to stop Trump?”, a discussion about strike action has been rapidly developing. The “chaos” we created at the nation’s airports gives a hint of what’s possible. In spite of the protests being rapidly pulled together protesters won the immediate release of detained immigrants and even pushed sections of big business into coming out against Trump and his Muslim ban.
But we need to think deeply about where our strength lies and how to create disruption on an even greater scale. Working people have enormous potential power to shut down the profits of big business by taking action in their workplaces like slowdowns, sickouts, and strikes.
Last week, many organizers of the January women’s marches, joined by Angela Davis and others, called for a women’s strike on March 8 (International Women’s Day), to escalate the fight against Trump and build on the massive January 21 marches.
If the big women’s organizations, like Planned Parenthood, were to join in this call it could have a profound impact by bringing hundreds of thousands again on the streets and this time tapping into the strategic potential of mass workplace action. Unfortunately, the leadership of many of these organizations are often too timid due to their political outlook and ties to the Democratic Party establishment. In many cases it will take serious pressure from below to overcome this barrier.
March 8 can be a springboard to even larger protests and strike action across the country on May 1, International Workers’ Day. Historically “May Day” has been a global day of mass working class action. Immigrants restored the tradition of May Day to the United States in 2006, when they organized rallies of millions and hundreds of thousands went on strike as part of the “Day Without an Immigrant” in response to brutal Republican attacks.
The rapid pace of events may make May 1 seem a long way off, but we will need that time to organize a huge nationwide action which unites immigrants, women, union members, the Black Lives Matter movement, environmentalists, and all those threatened by Trump.
Let’s use the coming weeks to begin planning for workplace actions as well a mass peaceful civil disobedience that shuts down highways, airports, and other key infrastructure. Students can organize walkouts in their schools to send a powerful message that youth reject Trump’s racism and misogyny.
The participation of the labor movement would need to be central to this effort. With a clear lead from the union leadership millions of workers would eagerly respond. One day public-sector general strikes in key urban centers around the nation would be possible. Unfortunately, despite the attacks Trump is preparing against unions including national “right to work” (for less) legislation, some labor leaders believe they can try and appease Trump rather than going all out to build resistance. Other union and progressive leaders hope to be saved by the 2018 or 2020 elections, but we cannot wait two years to defend ourselves. Others will point to the undemocratic restrictions in American labor law.
But rank-and-file pressure can drive home the idea that May Day actions have more potential to change the parameters of US politics than decades of insider lobbying. Talk of strike action is already bubbling up within the labor movement. Last week, the Seattle Education Association passed a resolution for the Washington Education Association, the National Education Association, and other AFL-CIO unions to call on their affiliates for a one-day nationwide strike on May 1.
Two days later, the board of directors of the Minnesota Nurses Association passed a similar resolution, this one calling for “an intense discussion about workplace education and information meetings and protest action on May Day, May 1st 2017, including a discussion within the AFL-CIO about a call for a nationwide strike that day.”
Rank-and-file union members and left labor leaders should rapidly move to bring resolutions and make the case within their own unions for May 1 strike action.
Without a union it is of course much harder for workers to strike. We should appeal to everybody to support this strike and join in where it is possible to do so. We want the largest possible show of force, while keeping in mind that such actions would be too risky for some workers to take part in.
This is a long battle and we are just starting to get organized. Let’s use March 8 and May 1 to build our strength and lay the basis for even stronger actions that allow for larger numbers of workers to strike.
Our strength is in numbers and organization. We can protect each other best against retaliation from our bosses by organizing our co-workers to join with us and building widespread support in our communities.
Where there is no formal strike or any union, other forms of workplace action can include using individual sick days or vacation days, organizing for a lunch-time meeting of your co-workers, or possibly leaving work early to join protests (as happened in Poland last October).
We will not defeat Trump in one day alone. But a nationwide strike on May Day would, without a doubt, represent an enormous step forward for our movement.
Let’s seize the time and make this May Day a turning point in the struggle to bring down this dangerous administration and put forward the type of politics than can challenge the rule of the billionaire class.
FOCUS: It's Called May Day, Not Loyalty Day: The Continued Subversion of a Day for Worker Solidarity
Monday, 01 May 2017 11:41
Cotton writes: "It is no coincidence that the United States government chose to replace May Day with Loyalty Day. In examining the origin and purpose of May Day, the underlying motives for the subversion of a day set aside for worker solidarity in favor of a day set aside for "loyalty" to the United States become extremely clear."
Members of the 'Full Rights for Immigrants Coalition' displayed a giant effigy of then-candidate Donald Trump on May Day in Los Angeles last year. (photo: Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images)
It's Called May Day, Not Loyalty Day: The Continued Subversion of a Day for Worker Solidarity
By Rob Cotton, Inquisitr
01 May 17
onald Trump on Friday released a written statement in anticipation of “Loyalty Day,” to be observed on May 1, 2017, a date which many people all over the world recognize as May Day, a day to celebrate the working class, commemorate the historical fight for labor rights, and raise awareness of the current struggle of the working class. Trump is not the first President to subvert May Day in favor of a more “patriotic” re-branding. According to official Government Publishing Office documents, Loyalty Day was established in 1955 via a joint resolution of the U.S. House of Representatives.
“Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the 1st day of May 1955 is hereby designated as Loyalty Day and is set aside as a special day for the reaffirmation of loyalty to the United States of America and for the recognition of the heritage of American freedom,” the document says. “The President of the United States is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon officials of the Government to display the flag of the United States on all Government buildings on such day and inviting the people of the United States to observe such day, in schools and other suitable places, with appropriate ceremonies.”
Donald Trump’s Loyalty Day proclamation stays true to this request, according to RT.
“The United States stands as the world’s leader in upholding the ideals of freedom, equality, and justice,” Trump’s proclamation reads. “Together, and with these fundamental concepts enshrined in our Constitution, our nation perseveres in the face of those who would seek to harm it.”
It is no coincidence that the United States government chose to replace May Day with Loyalty Day. In examining the origin and purpose of May Day, the underlying motives for the subversion of a day set aside for worker solidarity in favor of a day set aside for “loyalty” to the United States become extremely clear.
According to the History Channel, the first day of May is commonly referred to as May Day in commemoration of the 1886 Chicago Haymarket riots. The Haymarket riots were labor rights rallies that became violent due to police provocation in support of the business owners. A homemade bomb was thrown into the crowd at one point and several people died. Despite not being able to determine who threw the bomb, eight labor leaders were charged for murder, some of whom were not even at the riots, and none of whom could be linked to the bombing. A complete lack of evidence linking the accused to the crime did not hurt the prosecution and media propaganda painted a grim picture of the accused, casting them as “long-haired, wild-eyed, bad smelling, atheistic, reckless foreign wretches.” Seven of the eight were sentenced to death and one was sentenced to fifteen years hard labor.
According to the National Coalition Against Censorship, an international organization of labor and socialist parties met in Paris in July, 1889, calling themselves the Second International. The Second International decided to recognize the first day of May each year as a day to commemorate the anniversary of the Haymarket protests and to recognize the great strides made by labor rights organizers in the ensuing years.
The idea caught on, but in the United States official moves were made to prevent the recognition of May Day. In 1894, following another protest in Chicago, the Pullman strike, President Grover Cleveland declared the first Monday in September as Labor Day, according to Huffington Post. The move was designed because the government feared commemoration of the Haymarket protests would draw people to communism, anarchism, or other radical ideas tied to labor movements worldwide. By 1921, the first red scare was in full swing in the United States and authorities began re-branding the first day of May as Americanization Day, a day to celebrate patriotic loyalty to the United States. By the 1950’s, Americanization Day gave way to Loyalty Day, which was officially recognized in 1955 and made an official holiday in 1958. Subversion completed.
Every United States President since the 1950s has followed in proclaiming the first of May as Loyalty Day, despite murmurs of protests from labor activists and others who recognize the day as May Day rather than its jingoist replacement. Growing discontent with the political system and recognition of the way it works in favor of the wealthy corporations and against the working class is raising the decibel level of those who choose to celebrate May Day rather than Loyalty Day in the United States. According to Patch, major May Day protests are planned in Seattle and other cities across the country. It’s safe to say that Loyalty Day may not succeed in drowning out May Day in 2017.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.