RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
The Harvey Weinstein Scandal Is Changing How I Look at the Movies Print
Sunday, 15 October 2017 08:28

Stevens writes: "Just as the election challenged my perception of America, the past week has transformed my whole understanding of Hollywood."

Harvey Weinstein. (image: Slate/Thinkstock/Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images)
Harvey Weinstein. (image: Slate/Thinkstock/Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images)


The Harvey Weinstein Scandal Is Changing How I Look at the Movies

By Dana Stevens, Slate

15 October 17


Just as the election challenged my perception of America, the past week has transformed my whole understanding of Hollywood.

or the past week I’ve been pacing my apartment in a hypomanic state, pretending to get work done while following—probably more closely than anyone who aspires to sanity should—the Harvey Weinstein scandal, with its ever-steepening crescendo of allegations that the fabled indie producer carried on a 30-year side career as a deliberate and ruthless sexual predator. As each new story breaks, the evidence gets starker that Weinstein was in effect using the company he ran with his brother as a personal procurement agency, enabled by a complicit workplace, a sick industry, and a broader ambient culture of misogyny and unchecked male privilege. Our family’s swear jar, which my puritanical 11-year-old insists on monitoring, has been filling up faster than usual. When we can’t fit in any more coins, I’ll donate the haul to an organization that aids abused women—or, perhaps more fittingly for this situation, teaches men not to abuse in the first place. We could use more charities like that.

Experientially, for me at least, and I believe for many women, this week has felt more than anything like a show business–themed reboot of the horrible seven days that followed the election of Donald Trump, almost a year ago now. There’s that same sense of reality shifting to reveal a hidden and perverse order, one that was there all along—we sensed it obliquely, even made jokes about it—but that had never before been put on such blatant, obscene display. I was talking with some women about this yesterday, trying to pin down the precise dimension of the feeling. It’s the sinking realization of the unexpected depth of a problem, the discovery that your kitchen floor doesn’t just need refinishing but has been eaten from within by a seething mass of termites.

On Wednesday’s Slate Culture Gabfest, our weekly podcast about the arts, my co-host Stephen Metcalf asked whether, in the course of a decade of writing on movies, I had encountered any of the more sordid Weinstein rumors. In the weighted word that’s emerged as an ambiguous moral litmus test this week, did I “know”? I truly didn’t—a fact that, even as I recognized it, made me guiltily question whether I should have. If I’d read the trade papers more assiduously, or paid attention to industry gossip, or dug into the subtext of Seth MacFarlane’s joke during the nomination announcements for the 2013 Oscars, I might not have been as blindsided by the disclosure. I’m sure I was watching that early-morning announcement, still bleary from sleep, pen in hand to scribble down notes for a “who was snubbed?” post, mentally fast-forwarding past the joke as another crass Seth MacFarlane moment. And all that time it was my humanity, along with that of half the human race, that was getting the snub big time.

Layered over the conversations about what happened to whom, which are incredible enough—Mira Sorvino? Gwyneth Paltrow? Angelina fricking Jolie? Was no woman in Hollywood powerful enough to be out of this man’s sticky-palmed reach?—are the conversations about who knew what when, or should have, and what actions those who knew or suspected should have taken. These conversations can too easily devolve into blame-shifting, and shouldn’t. Ultimately the responsibility rests with one man. But they’re important conversations, too, in that they acknowledge the systemic nature of the abuse. That’s what makes this serial-abuser story different from that of, say, Bill Cosby: Harvey Weinstein wasn’t just a highly successful individual but the creator and maintainer of a whole production line of success, known for his bullheaded but unstoppable Oscar campaigns, often for films starring and marketed to women (Chocolat, EmmaShakespeare in Love). It was true that he could make or break an actress’s career, like a cigar-chomping old Hollywood mogul. MGM’s Louis B. Mayer, a patriarchal fosterer of talent to whom Weinstein was often compared, used to make the teenage Judy Garland sit on his lap. Even before he was exposed as a serial abuser and alleged rapist, Weinstein was well-known for trafficking in women. The shock is just in discovering how literal, and how violent, that traffic has been.

The movie industry I’ve known for the past 30 years—and written about for more than a third of that time—is reconstituting itself in my mind this week like pieces of a broken mirror being glued back in place, the cracks now forever visible. Gwyneth Paltrow holding her Oscar for Shakespeare in Love, standing beaming next to the man whose hotel suite she had to escape from a few years earlier after he invited her to the bedroom for a massage. (He laid off after a talking-to from Paltrow’s then-boyfriend Brad Pitt, now also forever to be remembered as someone Who Knew.) Or Mira Sorvino getting her Oscar for Mighty Aphrodite and then mysteriously—or perhaps not so mysteriously anymore—fading from the screen. Or Rosanna Arquette never going on to the career she deserved—maybe she would’ve won her own Oscar, or gone on to direct, or run a studio not based on trading female flesh. Or all the once-aspiring actors like Sophie Dix, whose names I didn’t know but who I might be a fan of today if they hadn’t been scared away from show business by encounters like the one Dix still deems “the single most damaging thing that’s happened in my life.”

Asia Argento, the fiercely original actress and director who’s the daughter of Italian horror maestro Dario Argento, says she lived through her own private horror movie with Weinstein, an experience of forced oral sex that she vividly describes as “a big fat man wanting to eat you … a scary fairy tale.” Her story, as told to Ronan Farrow in the New Yorker—where it’s accompanied by Weinstein’s denial of all “allegations of non-consensual sex” and all “acts of retaliation against any women for refusing his advances”—was particularly courageous both in its explicitness and in its candor; as she tells Farrow, that frightening first encounter later turned into a consensual, if one-sided and power-imbalanced, sexual relationship. In the most wrenching detail of Argento’s account, she describes, that first night at his hotel, faking what Farrow euphemistically calls “enjoyment”—feigning, one supposes, an orgasm—to bring the assault to an end. She says that since that moment, which must have called for a performance beyond all Oscars, she has never been able to take pleasure in that supposedly woman-centered sex act again. If nothing else good comes of this awful week, at least the continuous wave of new stories about abuse and harassment in show business and other industries—Thursday, Amazon suspended one of its top executives after a harassment allegation—makes it clear that women, actors or no, are done pretending.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Trump Says IQ "Even Higher" Now That He Knows Virgin Islands Are Part of US Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=9160"><span class="small">Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker</span></a>   
Saturday, 14 October 2017 14:32

Borowitz writes: "Donald Trump said on Friday that his I.Q. is 'even higher' now that he knows that the United States Virgin Islands are part of the United States."

Donald Trump. (photo: AP)
Donald Trump. (photo: AP)


Trump Says IQ "Even Higher" Now That He Knows Virgin Islands Are Part of US

By Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker

14 October 17

 

The article below is satire. Andy Borowitz is an American comedian and New York Times-bestselling author who satirizes the news for his column, "The Borowitz Report."


onald Trump said on Friday that his I.Q. is “even higher” now that he knows that the United States Virgin Islands are part of the United States.

“Quite frankly, a few weeks ago, when I learned that Puerto Rico was a part of the U.S., I thought that that boosted my I.Q. to a whole new level,” Trump said. “Now that I also know about the Virgin Islands, my number must be off the charts.”

He said that he was eager to retake his I.Q. test because of “all the amazing things I learned this week.”

“For example, I just learned that the stock market can’t reduce the national debt,” he said. “If there was a question about that on an I.Q. test, I would nail that question.”

Trump said that his one concern was that an I.Q. test does not exist that can accurately measure his ballooning intelligence.

“I always knew that I was scary smart, but now I think my brain is terrifying,” he said.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: The Same People Who Brought You the Iraq War Are Now Pushing for War With Iran Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=35143"><span class="small">Paul Gottinger, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Saturday, 14 October 2017 12:25

Gottinger writes: "On Friday afternoon, Donald Trump began the process of killing the Iran nuclear deal by refusing to certify that Iran was meeting its commitments under the deal."

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks at a rally organized by Tea Party Patriots in on Capitol Hill in Washington, September 9, 2015, to oppose the Iran nuclear agreement. (photo: AP)
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks at a rally organized by Tea Party Patriots in on Capitol Hill in Washington, September 9, 2015, to oppose the Iran nuclear agreement. (photo: AP)


The Same People Who Brought You the Iraq War Are Now Pushing for War With Iran

By Paul Gottinger, Reader Supported News

14 October 17

 

n Friday afternoon, Donald Trump began the process of killing the Iran nuclear deal by refusing to certify that Iran was meeting its commitments under the deal.

Trump has threatened to walk away from the deal if Congress doesn’t adjust it to his specifications, although both Iran and the other signers of the agreement say US changes may constitute breaches of the agreement.

Trump announced the decision in a bizarre speech filled with anti-Iran falsehoods. The tone of the speech was reminiscent of the bald-faced lies the Bush administration told to Americans in the run-up to the war in Iraq. Once again, a Republican administration is lying to Americans about a Middle Eastern country’s alleged WMD program, setting us on a path to war.

Trump has falsely claimed that Iran violated the agreement on a number of occasions. Yet the International Atomic Energy Agency, Trump’s own secretary of state, and even his defense secretary say this is not true.

The former director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said on Friday, “Trump ignoring IAEA inspection findings re Iran’s compliance w/ nuclear deal brings to mind run up to Iraq war. Will we ever learn?”

In his speech, Trump claimed Iran was intimidating nuclear inspectors and preventing access to inspection of certain locations. But the IAEA undercut this statement as well: “So far, the IAEA has had access to all areas it needed to visit.”

Trump also made fictional connections between Iran and al Qaeda, just as the Bush administration did between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda. The Trump administration is recycling the same Bush administration lies, this time about a new country, to push a new war.

Given the similar style of the rhetoric, it makes sense that a number of Bush-era individuals and organizations are behind Trump’s Iran policy.

Trump reportedly consulted with Fox News’ Sean Hannity and neocon and Bush administration alumnus John Bolton on what to do about the Iran deal. They both pushed Trump to adopt a hard line on Iran.

In the end, these two won out over the advice of Trump’s own secretary of defense, secretary of state, and national security advisor, who all recommended certifying the deal.

John Bolton was seen entering the White House just days before Trump made his announcement on the Iran deal. Mr. Bolton also reached Trump by phone Thursday evening, the night before his address announcing his refusal to certify the agreement.

Bolton phoned Trump from Las Vegas, where he was meeting with the conservative mega-donor Sheldon Adelson. Bolton’s influence could be seen in the speech as well. He had pushed Trump to say that the US can cancel the deal at any time, and Trump ended up using the phrase in his address on Friday.

Bolton said following Trump’s announcement, “The Iran deal may not have died today, but it will shortly.”

Bolton is far from the only voice from the Bush administration gaining influence in the Trump administration. Following Trump’s difficulty attracting staff early in his presidency, a number of figures from the Bush administration were appointed to high-profile positions in the Trump administration.

Nikki Haley, who was the major voice within the administration pushing to decertify the deal, has been known to dig up Bush administration files to help draft her strategy.

In addition, Mark Dubowitz, head of the neocon think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), delivered a 7-page memo to Trump’s National Security Council earlier this year that called for regime change in Iran.

The FDD was founded in the days after 9/11 to push the Iraq war and the other failed policies of the Bush administration. It has received enormous donations from Sheldon Adelson and other conservative billionaires.

The FDD memo discussed ways the US might generate civil unrest in Iran, with the goal being a ‘free and democratic’ Iran. George W. Bush often spoke of a “free and democratic Iraq” during his devastating war there.

Given the history of US support for the 1953 coup and US support for the Shah dictatorship, most Iranians will have trouble taking US promises of democracy and freedom seriously.

The memo also repeated a popular motif of US regime-change delusions, certainly something that’s been said about North Korea for decades, that the country is on the verge of collapse.

Following Trump’s decision not to certify the Iran deal, the FDD began pushing the lie that Iran had harbored al Qaeda operatives after 9/11. In actuality, Iran captured al Qaeda members like Osama bin Laden’s son, Saad bin Laden, and offered him to the US. The Bush administration even admitted in 2008 that Iran rounded up hundreds of al Qaeda suspects who had fled Afghanistan for Iran and had passed their information on to the US.

Trump’s decision to listen to Iran hard-liners and begin unraveling the agreement has left the US completely isolated from its traditional allies in Europe. A joint statement by the leaders of the UK, Germany, and France voiced their collective commitment to the deal.

The lone voices of praise for Trump’s decision came from rogue states of the Middle East, all with long histories of human rights abuse. The brutal dictatorship of Saudi Arabia, the country to which Trump made his first foreign visit and which has pledged hundreds of billions to the Trump administration in the form of weapons deals, praised Trump’s decision. Benjamin Netanyahu’s Israel and the repressive dictatorship of the UAE joined in the praise as well.

But can Trump unilaterally blow up the deal?

The National Iranian American Council stated after Trump’s announcement, “Contrary to the reporting, Donald Trump is killing the deal – not in one move, but in several moves. First, Congress will attempt to kill it through deal-killing legislation from Tom Cotton. If that is blocked, Trump has vowed to kill it himself. Either way, the deal will get killed by this process triggered by Trump.”

“Cotton’s legislation would seek to unilaterally rewrite the nuclear deal, an unequivocal violation of the agreement. A vote for that bill would be as significant as a vote for the 2002 war with Iraq.”

Senator Bernie Sanders echoed similar sentiments yesterday as well: “Now that this decision has been put in Congress’ hands, it’s up to us to stop this drift toward war.”

Despite Trump’s lies about Iran supporting terror, Iran is a vital part of the anti-ISIS coalition in Iraq and Syria. ISIS is now on the run, and al Qaeda has been weakened, but the Trump administration is taking its eye off the ball to fracture the anti-ISIS coalition by starting a potentially disastrous conflict with Iran.

The US is still in Iraq 16 years after the US first went to war there in 2003. The result of that invasions was death on a massive scale, destruction, debt, and the unleashing of a new and even more vicious terror organization. It would be wise for the US to avoid making those mistakes again, as the consequences may be even worse this time.



Paul Gottinger is a staff reporter at RSN whose work focuses on the Middle East and the arms industry. He can be reached on Twitter @paulgottinger or via email.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: I Went to School With the Vegas Shooter Print
Saturday, 14 October 2017 11:17

Palast writes: "When we were at Francis Polytechnic High in Sun Valley, Steve Paddock and I were required to take electrical shop class. At Poly and our junior high, we were required to take metal shop so we could work the drill presses at the GM plant. We took drafting. Drafting like in 'blueprint drawing.'"

Mobile home on tracks, Sun Valley, California, birthplace of the Vegas shooter. (photo: The Best Democracy Money Can Buy)
Mobile home on tracks, Sun Valley, California, birthplace of the Vegas shooter. (photo: The Best Democracy Money Can Buy)


I Went to School With the Vegas Shooter

By Greg Palast, Greg Palast's Website

14 October 17

 

hen we were at Francis Polytechnic High in Sun Valley, Steve Paddock and I were required to take electrical shop class. At Poly and our junior high, we were required to take metal shop so we could work the drill presses at the GM plant. We took drafting. Drafting like in "blueprint drawing."

Paddock. Palast. We sat next to each other at those drafting tables with our triangular rulers and #2 pencils so we could get jobs at Lockheed as draftsman drawing blueprints of fighter jets. Or do tool-and-dye cutting to make refrigerator handles at GM where they assembled Frigidaire refrigerators and Chevys.

But we weren’t going to fly the fighter jets. Somewhere at Phillips Andover Academy, a dumbbell with an oil well for a daddy was going to go to Yale and then fly our fighter jets over Texas. We weren’t going to go to Yale. We were going to go to Vietnam. Then, when we came back, if we still had two hands, we went to GM or Lockheed.

(It’s no coincidence that much of the student population at our school was Hispanic.)

But if you went to "Bevvie" - Beverly Hills High - or Hollywood High, you didn’t take metal shop. You took Advanced Placement French. You took Advanced Placement Calculus. We didn’t have Advanced Placement French. We didn’t have French anything. We weren’t Placed, and we didn’t Advance.

Steve was a math wizard. He should have gone to UCLA, to Stanford. But our classes didn’t qualify him for anything other than LA Valley College and Cal State Northridge. Any dumbbell could get in. And it was nearly free. That’s where Steve was expected to go, and he went with his big math-whiz brain. And then Steve went to Lockheed, like we were supposed to. Until Lockheed shut down plants in 1988. Steve left, took the buy-out.

And after NAFTA, GM closed too.

Land of Opportunity? Well, tell me: who gets those opportunities?

Some of you can and some of you can’t imagine a life where you just weren’t give a fair chance. Where the smarter you are, the more painful it gets, because you have your face pressed against the window, watching THEM. THEY got the connections to Stanford. THEY get the gold mine. WE get the shaft.

This is where Paddock and Palast were bred: Sun Valley, the anus of Los Angeles. Literally. It’s where the sewerage plant is. It’s in a trench below the Hollywood Hills, where the smog settles into a kind of puke yellow soup. Here’s where LA dumps its urine and the losers they only remember when they need cheap labor and cheap soldiers when the gusanos don’t supply enough from Mexico.

I’ll take you to Sun Valley. It’s in my film, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy. In the movie, a kind of dream scene, the actress Shailene Woodley takes me back to my family’s old busted home in the weeds and then down San Fernando Road, near Steve's place. Take a look, America. Along the tracks that once led in to the GM plant, you see a bunch of campers that the union men bought for vacations. Now they live in them.

No, Steve’s brain was too big to end up on the tracks. He lived in empty apartments in crappy buildings he bought, then in a barren tract house outside Reno. I laugh when they say he was "rich." He wanted to be THEM, to have their stuff. He got close.

It’s reported that Steve was a "professional gambler." That’s another laugh. He was addicted to numbing his big brain by sitting 14 hours a day in the dark in front of video poker machines. He was a loser. Have you ever met a gambler who said they were a Professional Loser?

It’s fair to ask me: Why didn’t I end up in a hotel room with a bump-stock AR-15 and 5,000 rounds of high velocity bullets?

Because I have a job, a career, an OBSESSION: to hunt down THEM, the daddy-pampered pricks who did this to us, the grinning billionaire jackals that make a profit off the slow decomposition of the lives I grew up with.

But I’m telling you, that I know it’s a very fine line, and lots of crazy luck, that divided my path from Paddock’s.

Dear Reader: The publication that pulled this story at the last moment was plain scared–that they’d be accused of approving murder.

Paddock slaughtered good people, coldly, with intense cruelty, destroying lives and hundreds of families forever. If you think I’m making up some excuse for him, then I give up.

But also this: The editor of the Beverly Hills-based publication, a Stanford grad, could not understand that, just like veterans of the Vietnam war who suffer from PTSD even today, so too, losers of the class war can be driven mad by a PTSD that lingers, that gnaws away, their whole lives.

What happens to a dream deferred? Does it ...fester like a sore? Does it stink like rotten meat? Sag...like a heavy load?

Or does it explode?

Steve, you created more horrors than your cornered life could ever justify.

But, I just have to tell you, Steve: I get it.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Let Them Eat Paper Towels Print
Saturday, 14 October 2017 08:56

Krugman writes: "The situation in Iowa remains horrifying. More than a third of the population has been without clean water for three weeks, and waterborne diseases appear to be spreading."

Economist Paul Krugman. (photo: Forbes)
Economist Paul Krugman. (photo: Forbes)


Let Them Eat Paper Towels

By Paul Krugman, The New York Times

14 October 17

 

he situation in Iowa remains horrifying. More than a third of the population has been without clean water for three weeks, and waterborne diseases appear to be spreading. Only a sixth of the population has electricity. The health care system is a shambles, and sheer hunger may be a problem in some remote areas.

Fortunately, the federal government is going all out to aid its citizens in distress. The president is making disaster relief a top priority, while praising the often heroic efforts of Iowa residents to help themselves. And generous aid, he promises, will continue as long as it’s needed.

O.K., I lied. The dire situation I just described is in Puerto Rico, not Iowa (which happens to have just about the same number of U.S. citizens). And my upbeat portrayal of the federal response — which is how things might have played out if this nightmare were, in fact, in Iowa — is the opposite of the truth. What we’re actually witnessing, in effect, is the betrayal and abandonment of three and a half million of our own people.


READ MORE


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 Next > End >>

Page 1475 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN