RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
2018's Rainbow Tsunami Must Now Remake America Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=6004"><span class="small">Harvey Wasserman, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Monday, 12 November 2018 15:05

Wasserman writes: "The 2018 'Blue Wave' that dominates our national healing is, in fact, a mere ripple within the HUUUUUGE 'Rainbow Tsunami' that has two years to transform the nation."

Representative Rashida Tlaib of Michigan. (photo: Al Goldis/AP)
Representative Rashida Tlaib of Michigan. (photo: Al Goldis/AP)


2018's Rainbow Tsunami Must Now Remake America

By Harvey Wasserman, Reader Supported News

12 November 18

 

he 2018 “Blue Wave” that dominates our national healing is, in fact, a mere ripple within the HUUUUUGE “Rainbow Tsunami” that has two years to transform the nation.

It embodies the rise of a new generation – led by women – that embraces diversity and voted that way. Its larger destiny (we hope) is to help move our bleeding nation away from a male-dominated fossil/nuclear autocracy and toward a matriarchal, green-powered social democracy.

It’s now epitomized by the first open refusal of a major Democratic candidate to concede an obviously stolen election. If Stacey Abrams helps remake our elections into an actual democracy, a whole new world is possible.

Let’s count the ways:

This Rainbow vote was powered by a ten-point jump in turnout among citizens under 30, who went more than two-thirds against Trump.

They put close to 120 women into Congress, far more than ever before.

That includes the first two Muslim and the first two Indigenous female representatives, plus (pending Arizona’s outcome) the first openly bi-sexual US senator.

Colorado has America’s first openly gay governor. Tennessee has its first female US senator, and South Dakota its first female governor (both Republicans). Pending a runoff, Mississippi could get its first black US senator since Reconstruction.

Georgia and Florida could get their first black governors (much more on that later). God-awful Trumpists Kris Kobach and Scott Walker lost governorships in Kansas and Wisconsin, as did Bruce Rauner in Illinois. California’s brutal Representative Dana Rohrabacher will leave the House.

That very Blue House can now resist Trump’s dictatorial ambitions. Imagine the Fascist Hell we’d now occupy if this had gone Red.

The substance of this Rainbow has yet to prove itself. It needs to stand and not break in the face of a psychotic mobster who has transformed the Republican Party into a personal machine of totalitarian terror. Control of one house of Congress will mean little if its progressive members don’t stand firm for peace, social justice, and the American freedoms of speech and press ... and then move forcefully to transform both the Democratic Party and the way this nation does its political and ecological business.

There is much more:

Thanks to Stacey Abrams and the Georgia/Florida electorates, we may see real change in our warped electoral system.

Voting to transcend Jim Crow and restore their citizens’ rights to some 1.5 million ex-felons, Floridians reshaped their electoral calculus.

But these two states have been wracked with exactly the kind of election fraud and theft that the media and major parties have been denying since at least Florida 2000. That year, Bev Harris and Greg Palast reported on then-governor Jeb Bush’s cynical registration roll-stripping and electronic machine-flipping that put his brother George in the White House.

Four years later, Bob Fitrakis and I reported on much, much more than was “test marketed” in Ohio to give Bush a second term.

Neither Al Gore nor John Kerry has yet to say a peep about it. For more than a decade, the major media – left, right, and center – has thoroughly trashed us as “conspiracy theorists” for exposing the obvious.

That it happened again in 2016, with Hillary Clinton saying nary a word, has brought us Donald Trump’s reign of terror.

But finally, thanks to Stacey Abrams, the realities of our porous, corrupt, thoroughly hacked system of fake elections are barreling into the mainstream. Journalists breathlessly reporting on exactly what we saw happen in Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004 will be lining up for Pulitzers in 2018.

It again started in Florida, with the usual tight outcomes in the races for Secretary of Agriculture (a position of real consequence in Florida) US Senate, and governor.

Andrew Gillum, Democratic candidate to become Florida’s first black governor, prematurely conceded. He should have known better.

Georgia’s Stacey Abrams made no such mistake. In election night’s most defiant moment, she became the first major Democrat to refuse to concede an obviously stolen election. She could become America’s first black female governor.

But like Florida, Georgia was defined by dirty tricks and the usual Jim Crow chaos in black and Hispanic precincts. Stacey’s white supremacist opponent, the since-resigned Secretary of State Brian Kemp, may have trashed more than 50,000 registration forms.

Abrams has refused to follow Al Gore, John Kerry and Hillary Clinton, who won presidential elections in 2000, 2004 and 2016 but continue to ignore the stripped registration rolls and flipped vote counts that enthroned Shrub and Trump. We now have a chance, as the battle unfolds, to thoroughly unmask – and hopefully remake – a system of balloting that’s made an utter mockery of American democracy.

In some rarified places with farsighted election officials actually paying attention, 2018 highlighted new voting machines producing unhackable ballot images with reliable paper backups.

State and local officials still resist. But as promoted by election integrity activist John Brakey, over the coming years they could help end much of the tally flipping that’s helped move our governance so far to the right.

New Democrat governors and newly controlled or split state legislatures will help undo some of the gerrymandering that’s also poisoned us.

Overall the Democrats won the nation’s House votes by more than 8% and picked up some 30 seats. But gerrymandered district maps in Ohio and North Carolina (and in Florida and Georgia if Trump wins governorships there) will embody serious barriers to democracy for years to come.

On the Senate side, some 48 million votes (57%) went to the Democrats versus 34 million for the Trumpists. But Trump still picked up seats.

California, with 40 million people, has just two US senators to match 40 from some 20 states with the same total population. Sooner or later, that has to change.

Judicial appointments from Trump and a warped Senate will remain a horror show for years to come.

Referenda expanded legalized pot, raised some wages and protected transgender rights. California kept a gas tax.

But the transformative potential of the Rainbow momentum toward 2020 is epic.

The Republican Party is now Trump’s personal cult.

And the corporate Democrats continue to wage their own uncivil war against the social democrats of Bernie Sanders, Occupy, Black Lives Matter, #MeToo and the rest of the grassroots groundswell.

The Democratic Party’s entrenched gerontocracy, with its lack of tangible accomplishments and unwillingness to fight for election integrity, has given Trump his shot at outright dictatorship.

If Nancy Pelosi (as is likely) becomes speaker again, maybe she’ll mentor a new generation while driving Trump crazy.

But Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Party Chair Tom Perez must be replaced with people less corrupt, more progressive, and maybe even a little bit charismatic.

A new generation’s grassroots social democracy must now transform the Democratic Party as a whole.

This mid-term election may be ultimately remembered as the one where we dodged America’s deadliest dictatorial bullet.

But only if the Rainbow Tsunami brings us a whole new way of thinking, voting, doing and winning.

Email This Page



Harvey "Sluggo" Wasserman's Life & Death Spiral of US History: From Deganawidah to the Trumpocalypse will soon be published via Solartopia.org. His "California Solartopia" show airs at KPFK-Pacifica in Los Angeles. "Green Power & Wellness" is at prn.fm.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: How Blue States Help Red States Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=39255"><span class="small">Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Website</span></a>   
Monday, 12 November 2018 11:32

Reich writes: "Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress love to demonize government handouts, which, in fact, their own supporters depend on and are increasingly financed by taxpayers in blue states."

Former Clinton labor secretary Robert Reich. (photo: Steve Russell/Toronto Star)
Former Clinton labor secretary Robert Reich. (photo: Steve Russell/Toronto Star)


How Blue States Help Red States

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Website

12 November 18

 

onald Trump and Republicans in Congress love to demonize government handouts, which, in fact, their own supporters depend on and are increasingly financed by taxpayers in blue states.  

The federal program Temporary Assistance for Needy Families – what we used to call “welfare” – provides cash assistance to fewer than 1 percent of Americans.

But the Trump administration is proposing to lump many social programs under a new agency with the word “welfare” in its title. 

A recent White House report on imposing work requirements, for example, put Medicaid, food assistance, and housing aid into a rebranded program called “noncash welfare.”

Defined this broadly, a large chunk of America relies on welfare. Add in disability benefits, unemployment insurance, and medical benefits, such so-called “welfare” amounts to 17 percent of the average American’s income.

Welfare has become especially unpopular in “red” states that vote Republican and support Trump. 

But these same states are often the biggest beneficiaries of government assistance.

Include price supports for agriculture, subsidies for land management and forestry, and defense contractors, and you find that a large portion of the economies of red states depend on federal dollars.

Here’s the irony. Residents of “blue” states send more tax money to Washington than they get back in federal help, while residents of “red” states send less money to Washington than they get back in federal help.

In 2015, for example, New Jersey got back only 74 cents in federal spending for  every tax dollar it sent to Washington. New York got back 81 cents, Connecticut: 82 cents, and Massachusetts: 83 cents.

But when you turn to the red states, it’s the opposite. Mississippi received $2.13 for every tax dollar it sent to Washington. West Virginia: $2.07. Kentucky: $1.90. And South Carolina: $1.71.

Taking the Trump administration’s expansive view of the meaning of welfare to its logical conclusion to include all those benefiting from federal spending, blue states are sending welfare to red states – the same red states that say they don’t like welfare.

Under Trump’s new tax law, blue states will be giving even more welfare handouts to red states. That’s because the law set new limits to the amount of state and local taxes people can deduct from their federal taxable incomes. And since people in blue states pay much more state and local taxes than people in red states, blue-staters will be paying that much more in federal taxes.

Which means an even bigger transfer from blue state residents to all those red state Republican voters, whose party despises handouts.

Now, I should add that some of us here in blue states don’t mind giving red states a bigger helping hand. The vast majority of Americans also oppose cuts to programs that aid the poor, elderly and sick. Because most Americans figure we’re all in this together, and those of us who can do so ought to help out those in need.

We don’t regard it as welfare handouts. We call it social insurance. Indeed, social insurance is needed and used by almost all of us, when you include Social Security, Medicare, and unemployment insurance.  And even programs relied upon mostly by the poor end up helping a large portion of us because roughly one-third of all Americans are poor at some point in their lives.

So remember, attacks on so-called welfare are just another means of attacking the things most of us need, and dividing the country into us and them. 

In reality, voters in red states are as dependent on the federal government as voters in blue states, and, truth be told, even more dependent.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
RSN: It Was Progressive Energy That Fueled the Democratic Wave Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=63"><span class="small">Marc Ash, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Monday, 12 November 2018 09:39

Ash writes: "The 'new' candidates at the core of the Democratic takeover of the House of Representatives were decidedly, disproportionally Progressives."

Texas High student Senior Paisley Allen poses proudly with her 'I voted' sticker. Midterm elections ended at 7pm on November 6th. (photo: Holland Rainwater)
Texas High student Senior Paisley Allen poses proudly with her 'I voted' sticker. Midterm elections ended at 7pm on November 6th. (photo: Holland Rainwater)


It Was Progressive Energy That Fueled the Democratic Wave

By Marc Ash, Reader Supported News

12 November 18

 

he “new” candidates at the core of the Democratic takeover of the House of Representatives were decidedly, disproportionally Progressives. Demographically and ideologically the charge was led by women, minorities, and LGBT candidates, the common thread being an ability to convey progressive values successfully to voters in blue, red, and purple districts alike.

The marquee issue for the Democrats was Bernie Sanders’ signature issue from the 2016 presidential campaign, healthcare – specifically, healthcare for all. In fact, it was a Bernie-style campaign game plan: forget about the barriers and talk to the voters about the issues that make a difference in their lives.

This is a win for Progressives as much as it is an affirmation of the progressive platform.

There has been and will be a lot of talk about whether Nancy Pelosi should continue to be the House Democratic leader. The time for a change may be at hand or not, depending on who else emerges as an option, the viability of the challenger being the key. Regardless, it must be someone who embraces what is clearly the future of the Democratic party and the will of the voters. Progress for the country.

This of course will almost certainly run contrary to the interests of many powerful and influential donors to Democrats and Republicans alike. The healthcare industry will be foremost, as meaningful healthcare reform and expansion must necessarily include a diversion of some of the enormous profits the healthcare industry enjoys into a public option that comforts and saves the lives of millions.

The defense and weapons industries will likewise come under ramped-up and well-deserved scrutiny as the bewildering scope of military spending becomes the subject of long overdue public and Congressional debate.

Perhaps of greatest importance during this election cycle was that mother of all progressive issues, voter suppression, which at long last came in from the cold and took its rightful seat at the table.

This unavoidably leads to a broader discussion and battles over money in politics, which will likely be the defining issue in 2020.

Email This Page



Marc Ash is the founder and former Executive Director of Truthout, and is now founder and Editor of Reader Supported News.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The Concertina Wire Trump Loves at the Border Has a Long, Troubling Legacy in the West Print
Monday, 12 November 2018 09:33

Onion writes: "It makes sense that Trump mentioned barbed wire in Montana. In typical Trump fashion, he's put his finger on the perfect symbol to activate his base - probably without even really knowing why."

A U.S. Army soldier stands on guard duty near the U.S.-Mexico border in Donna, Texas, on Nov. 5. (photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
A U.S. Army soldier stands on guard duty near the U.S.-Mexico border in Donna, Texas, on Nov. 5. (photo: John Moore/Getty Images)


The Concertina Wire Trump Loves at the Border Has a Long, Troubling Legacy in the West

By Rebecca Onion, Slate

12 November 18


The concertina wire Trump loves at the border has a long, troubling legacy in the West.

merican troops without much to do are on the U.S.-Mexico border stringing concertina wire, a type of barbed wire manufactured in coils and often used to create an obstacle in war, to stop a caravan of refugees that’s still thousands of miles away. In the absence of much else in the way of visual interest to illustrate the story, media outlets ran images of soldiers unspooling wire and spotlighted the word wire in their headlines. On Saturday, at a rally in Montana, President Trump hailed the troops’ work with wire in particular: “I noticed all that beautiful barbed wire going up today. Barbed wire used properly can be a beautiful sight.” His audience cheered.

It makes sense that Trump mentioned barbed wire in Montana. In typical Trump fashion, he’s put his finger on the perfect symbol to activate his base—probably without even really knowing why. (Barbed wire is such a rich symbol that it’s spawned multiple cultural histories, though if Trump has read one of them, I’ll eat a cedar fencepost.) Although some Trump opponents tweeted photos of concentration camp inmates along with the president’s words, barbed wire’s meanings—violent enclosure, permanent control—were first laid down in the American West.

Ohioan Lucien Smith patented barbed wire in 1867. Joseph Glidden patented the most widely used barbed wire fence in 1874, a dozen years after the passage of the Homestead Act. Even in its infancy, long before its uses on battlefields and concentration camps, this technology was far from politically neutral. Barbed wire, Reviel Netz writes in his history of the invention, “is contagious” because of the very fact that barbs face inward and outward, enclosing a rancher’s herd but also wounding any other cows that might try to encroach upon that land. “By enclosing a space,” Netz points out, “[barbed wire] is thereby automatically present in all areas bordering on that space.” It’s a tool of violence and surveillance. The 1885 Glidden Journal, a publication of the barbed wire company headed by Joseph Glidden, described its fence: “It watches with argus eyes the inside and outside, up, down, and lengthwise; it prevents the ‘ins’ from being ‘outs’; and the ‘outs’ from being ‘ins’; watches at day-break, at noontide, at sunset and all night long.” People who put up barbed wire fences when the technology was new were making statements about the nature of landowning in the West—defining the boundaries of their property with the permanent potential for violence.

The West’s enclosure via barbed wire had its victims. In 1947, historian Wayne Gard cataloged the resistance to barbed wire in Texas, which came from ranchers whose cattle couldn’t access water because so much open range was now fenced, as well as cowboys who were rendered obsolete by the new technology. When the fences first went up, owners of livestock sued railroads that were using them to keep animals off the tracks, seeking to hold the corporations liable for the damage the cows sustained. The blizzards of the mid-1880s concentrated tens of thousands of cows against new barbed wire fences in Texas, where they died of starvation or cold. The first generations of fences had larger, sharper barbs. The cows bashed against the fences and got wounds, which would get infested with screwworms.

But eventually, white settlers in the West learned to appreciate the way the fences allowed them to dominate far-flung spaces. The barbed wire companies helped them along. In a Trumpian spectacle of violent control, John “Bet-a-Million” Gates, a salesman of barbed wire working for the Washburn-Moen Company, came up with the gimmick of erecting a corral in Military Plaza in San Antonio in 1876 and putting a bunch of longhorns, green to the barbed wire concept, inside of it. The cattle tried to get out, slashing themselves against the fence, until they finally stopped trying. The crowd was convinced, and Gates brought in “orders for more wire than the factory could produce,” Sidney A. Brintle writes. Trump would also have approved of Gates’ later path: The showy salesman left Washburn-Moen, started a new barbed wire company where he made millions from wire manufactured using a patent of questionable legality, and turned the profits from that work into oil money.

Companies promoting barbed wire fencing used imagery in their promotional materials that played on familiar prejudices of the day, making sure the farmers and ranchers interested in buying knew that they could keep Native Americans, black people, children, beasts owned by others, and poor people out with the new invention. In their cultural history of barbed wire, Lyn Ellen Bennett and Scott Abbott find copious textual and visual examples in company literature: a barbed wire fence lining a field of watermelons while a Sambo figure salivates outside; a child in raggedy clothes caught on a fence, stolen apples spilling out of his pockets; a city-born “dude” dressed up in fancy gear, finding himself “pricked on barbs of steel.” The 1887 Glidden Barb-Fence Journal wrote of the idea of using barbed wire to fence out Native people: “The government should by all means adopt for this purpose the Glidden ‘Thick set.’ It makes the best ‘hog fence’ in the world. It might scratch the deviltry out of Geronimo and his gang.”

The barbed wire industry—prescient capitalists—envisioned that the uses for this fencing would go far beyond farming. An image of “Base Ball Grounds, enclosed with ‘Barb Armed’ Fence” showed how a sports promoter could make sure only paying spectators got the good seats.

The barbed wire fence was, in a word, patriarchal. “The character of a man may be known by a glance at his surroundings,” Bennett and Abbott quote an 1887 edition of the Glidden Barb-Fence Journal. “If the farmer’s buildings be snug … his stock sleek, well fed and kept in their proper places by good fences, you may be morally certain he is a prosperous, well-to-do and influential man in his community. You may also be certain that he used the Glidden wire.” The respectable farmer who used a barbed wire fence could make all things conform to his will. “The Barb Fence is the only means for obliging every body and every thing to enter a man’s premises by the same way that he himself enters,” Washburn & Moen and I.L. Ellwood wrote in an 1876 booklet. That beautiful, beautiful barbed wire.

Reviel Netz argues convincingly that the history of the technology’s development in the American West has to be seen in relationship with barbed wire’s later period, when the industry supplied armies and occupying forces with roll upon roll of the stuff to use for defense and imprisonment: “Both can be considered, at a certain level of abstraction, as expressions of the same relations: space being brought under control; flesh being brought under the violence of iron.”

During World War I, the industry boomed—U.S. Steel alone produced 2.8 million miles of wire, according to Netz. Even if not all of it was intended for the western front, Netz argues, “it would not be far wrong to say, as a rough estimate, that every day for the duration of the war, an amount of barbed wire equivalent to the entire length of the front was laid.” The wire was not, like a castle wall, a complete defense, but rather slowed men down as they tried to advance, making them into fodder for the newly available machine guns. The wire could be laid down fast, and so the fields of battle were covered in drifts of it. There are some horrible passages of memoirs of soldiers that touch on the effects of barbed wire. Netz quotes a passage from Erich Maria Remarque, who remembered seeing an advancing soldier shot while in a wire tangle: “His body collapses, his hands remain suspended as though he were praying. Then his body drops clean away and only his hands with the stumps of his arms, shot off, now hang in the wire.”

In the next war, when it was used to enclose concentration camps, Netz writes that “barbed wire reverted to its original function of controlling weak living beings, depriving them of their last powers so that total control could be gained.” As with so many Trumpian symbols, barbed wire’s darkest meanings are fascist: the domination of the powerless by the powerful. The fact that those meanings are also tied up with the dream of the West—to own land, and a lot of it; to be sure that nothing happens on that land that you cannot control; to inflict violence on those who threaten the dream—makes it the perfect fence for the moment.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Rick Scott Accuses Democrats of Trying to Thwart GOP's Successful Voter Suppression Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=9160"><span class="small">Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker</span></a>   
Sunday, 11 November 2018 14:56

Borowitz writes: "In a hastily called press conference on Thursday evening, Florida Governor Rick Scott accused Democrats of nefariously plotting to undo the Republican Party's highly successful voter-suppression effort."

Rick Scott. (photo: NY Post)
Rick Scott. (photo: NY Post)


Rick Scott Accuses Democrats of Trying to Thwart GOP's Successful Voter Suppression

By Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker

11 November 18

 

The article below is satire. Andy Borowitz is an American comedian and New York Times-bestselling author who satirizes the news for his column, "The Borowitz Report."


n a hastily called press conference on Thursday evening, Florida Governor Rick Scott accused Democrats of nefariously plotting to undo the Republican Party’s highly successful voter-suppression effort.

“As Republicans, we have worked tirelessly to intimidate, discourage, and otherwise disenfranchise millions of Florida voters,” a visibly enraged Scott said. “We are not about to let Democrats swoop in at the last minute and ruin all of that fine work.”

Scott angrily singled out the Broward County and Palm Beach County supervisors for their “rampant enforcement of the right to vote.”

“They are literally finding votes by people we are a hundred per cent sure we had scared away from the voting booths,” he said. “This will not stand.”

The Florida governor said that if Democrats think that they can undermine the Republicans’ arduous and painstaking efforts to suppress votes in Florida, “they better think again.”

“I will not sit idly by while every vote is counted,” Scott said. “This is Florida, goddammit.”

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 Next > End >>

Page 1078 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN