RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
FOCUS: The Democratic Nomination Poll MSNBC Did Not Show You Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=50584"><span class="small">Emerson Polling</span></a>   
Wednesday, 26 June 2019 11:38

Excerpt: "A new national poll finds the Democratic field coming into focus as the candidates prepare for this week's first debates."

Supporters of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren cheer outside a campaign event in South Carolina last weekend. (photo: Melina Mara/The Washington Post)
Supporters of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren cheer outside a campaign event in South Carolina last weekend. (photo: Melina Mara/The Washington Post)


The Democratic Nomination Poll MSNBC Did Not Show You

By Emerson Polling

26 June 19


MSNBC has been carefully crafting the perception that Joe Biden is the “front runner” for months. To substantiate that perception, they have leaned on one polling source in particular, Morning Consult.

Morning Consult has unsurprisingly shown Joe Biden doing significantly better than most other polls, with Biden leading Sanders and Warren by 19 and 26 points respectively. However, other polls show a much tighter race.

The June 21-24 poll produced by Emerson College Polling has Biden at 34%, Sanders at 27%, and Warren at 14%. But they also have Harris, Buttigieg, and Booker sharing an additional 16%. A much tighter race, and one ignored by MSNBC.

Two important takeaways here: while Harris, Buttigieg, and Booker are not really “Progressives,” their supporters would likely be inclined to vote Progressive if they dropped out. That means with Sanders and Warren sharing what Emerson finds is 41% and the 16% Harris, Buttigieg, and Booker command, you have close to 50% of Democratic voters leaning toward voting Progressive.

Joe Biden is working with a significant enthusiasm deficit. Democratic voters are not excited by him, they’re supporting him right now because the cable networks are carefully creating and reinforcing, on a daily basis, the perception that Biden is the frontrunner and that he is the candidate most likely to defeat Donald Trump.

That’s a rationale with a limited shelf-life.

MA/RSN


new national poll finds the Democratic field coming into focus as the candidates prepare for this week’s first debates. Joe Biden continues to hold his announcement bounce, and has gained a point since May – now holding 34% of the vote, followed by Senator Bernie Sanders who moved up 2 points to 27%. Senator Elizabeth Warren has broken away from the rest of those running, into 3rd place – improving from 10% of the vote up to 14%. Senator Kamala Harris comes in fourth with 7%, Mayor Pete Buttigieg is in fifth with 6%, and Senator Cory Booker follows in sixth with 3% of the vote. All other candidates poll at 1% or lower. The data was collected June 21-24, and has a margin of error of +/-4.5% for the Democratic primary.


Voters are excited in the lead up to the first Democratic Debates, being held on June 26 and 27th, with 72% saying they plan on tuning in to watch the 20 candidates. The most interest lies with Democratic primary voters, of which 85% plan to watch.

There is still room for movement within the primary race, as a majority of Democratic primary voters, 56%, said there is a chance they could change their mind and vote for someone else. Spencer Kimball, Director of the Emerson Poll, points out that, “similar to our other polls, Biden and Sanders voters are the most loyal with 50% to 55% saying they are set on their candidates. Comparatively, 33% of Warren, 18% of Harris and 17% of Buttigieg voters say they will stick with their current choices, this suggests that about 30% of the Democratic electorate are spoken for and another 30% leaning toward the top two candidates as of now leaves a narrow lane for another candidate to grab a plurality of the vote.”

Looking at demographics, Sanders continues to do the best among young voters with support of 38% of 18-29 year olds; Warren follows with 22%, while 21% support Biden, and 7% favor Harris and Booker. Among 30-49 year olds, Biden leads with 30%, followed by Sanders with 29%, Warren with 11%, and Harris with 8%. Among 50-64 year olds Biden also leads with 39%, followed by Sanders with 24%, Warren with 13% and Buttigieg with 8%. Finally, among those over 65 years old Biden leads with 52%, followed by Warren at 12%, Sanders at 11% and Buttigieg at 10%.

Among African-Americans, Biden holds a strong lead with 60% support, followed by Harris and Sanders with 12%, and Warren with 6%. Among white voters, Biden received 28% support followed by Sanders with 27%, Warren with 16% and Buttigieg with 11%. And among Hispanic or Latino voters, Sanders leads with 44%, followed by Biden with 26%, Warren with 11% and Harris with 7%.

President Trump maintains a steady approval rating of 43%, while his disapproval has dropped a point since last month to 48%. Their continues to be a gender divide regarding the President: among males 47% approve and 47% disapprove, as compared to females where 49% disapprove and 39% approve. Trump continues to hold a strong lead in the primary match-up against former Governor Bill Weld – 83% to 17% (n=407, +/- 4.9%).

In head to head match-ups, Trump trails all his Democratic opponents with Biden and Sanders holding 10 point leads 55% to 45%, Warren leading by 6, and Buttigieg and Harris leading by 4.


A majority of voters, 57%, said they think the current Presidential primary system should stay the same, with groups of states holding their primary or caucus on different days over the course of several months. 43% would like a change, advocating for a single day in which a national primary is held for all states. The support for the system staying the same varied slightly across all four regions of the country, with the greatest support in the Midwest at 65% and least in the Western states at 53%

Recently, the Democratic frontrunner Joe Biden changed positions on the Hyde Amendment which prohibits federal funds from being used to fund abortions with some exceptions. Overall 55% of voters support the Hyde Amendment, 45% oppose. Among Democrats, 43% support and 57% oppose, as contrasted to 75% of Republicans who support, and 25% who oppose the amendment. However, there is no gender divide on this issue, with 57% of men and 54% of women in support.

Overall, voters have not acclimated to a candidate who describes themselves as a Democratic Socialist – with 43% saying they would not vote for a candidate with this label, 30% of voters indicating they would vote for a Democratic Socialist,, and 27% unsure. Among Democratic primary voters, 56% said they would consider voting for a Democratic Socialist, 15% said they would not, and 29% are unsure. “The problem for Sanders and others who describe themselves as Democratic Socialists is that Independents are opposed, 42% to 26%, and that might be a problem for a Democratic nominee to overcome in a general election,” said Kimball, Director of the Emerson Poll.

The most important issue for voters is the economy at 33%, ranking as the top issue for all voters regardless of political affiliation. Healthcare is the second most important issue for voters at 21%, followed by immigration at 12% and social issues at 11%. Impeachment of President Trump was the least important of the 9 issues presented with only 2%. Republican voters differ on immigration with 20% saying it was most important to their vote, as compared with 9% of Independents and 6% of Democrats. On the flip side, Democrats care more about healthcare as an issue, with 26%, as compared with Independents at 19%, and Republicans at 18%. The environment is most important for 9% of Democrats and Independents, but for only 2% of Republicans. Independents differ on the issue of education, with 7% saying it was most important, while only half of that amount of Democrats and Republicans identify it as most important.

Caller ID

The national Emerson College poll was conducted June 21-24, 2019 under the Supervision of Professor Spencer Kimball. The sample consisted of registered voters, n=1,096, with a Credibility Interval (CI) similar to a poll’s margin of error (MOE) of +/- 2.9 percentage points. The data was weighted by age, gender, region, income, and education based on 2016 turnout modeling. It is important to remember that subsets based on gender, age, party breakdown, ethnicity and region carry with them higher margins of error, as the sample size is reduced. Data was collected using both an Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system of landlines only (n=697) and an online panel provided by Amazon Turk (n=399).

Full Results

Transparency Initiative

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: This Photo Is About Bodies - Migrant Bodies, and Our Body Politic. Don't Look Away Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=51051"><span class="small">Sabrina Vourvoulias, Guardian UK</span></a>   
Wednesday, 26 June 2019 10:52

Vourvoulias writes: "This is a story about bodies. A body of water. A river running through mountain, bosque, desert and city; along two pueblos, between two states and separating two countries."

'You cannot step into the same river twice, but you can step into the same story again and again and again. A story of desperate need and desperate hope that drives people to risk everything in uncertain and unfamiliar waters.' (photo: Julia Le Duc/AP)
'You cannot step into the same river twice, but you can step into the same story again and again and again. A story of desperate need and desperate hope that drives people to risk everything in uncertain and unfamiliar waters.' (photo: Julia Le Duc/AP)


This Photo Is About Bodies - Migrant Bodies, and Our Body Politic. Don't Look Away

By Sabrina Vourvoulias, Guardian UK

26 June 19


Monday’s image of a drowned two-year-old and her father will haunt us. I hope it changes us, too

his is a story about bodies.

A body of water. A river running through mountain, bosque, desert and city; along two pueblos, between two states and separating two countries.

I lived beside a running body of water for a time – this is what I learned: it is impossible to ignore its power. It whispers its summons: cross here. Ford the still points. Wade. Float. Swim. Drown.

Once, many years ago, I heard that after a prolonged torrential rainfall the Rio Grande (Rio Bravo del Norte, to Mexicans) had reached unprecedented levels. Its floodwaters swept through a riverfront church, pulled a large wooden cross from the wall and carried it on its current. A woman who had camped out on the Mexican side of the river with her two children, waiting to cross into the US, saw the dark shape in the water. Before it surged past her, she pushed her children into the river, toward it. “Hold on,” she said. “Hold on to it until you reach the other side.”

Maybe she believed they would be borne above the waters by faith. Maybe she so despaired of their survival on her side of the river she was willing to chance it. Maybe someday she might stop replaying the exact moment when she let go of their hands in the water.

You cannot step into the same river twice, but you can step into the same story again and again and again. A story of desperate need and desperate hope that drives people to risk everything in uncertain and unfamiliar waters.

On Monday, Valeria Martínez, a two-year-old Salvadoran child, was found drowned in the shallows of the Rio Grande; her father, Óscar Alberto Martínez, 26, by her side. The photo that circulated is as haunting, in its way, as the 2015 photograph of Alan Kurdi, the three-year-old Syrian child whose image – tiny, lifeless, lying face down in the surf in Greece – moved European leaders to re-examine their policies toward migrants.

In this photo, Valeria wears little black sneakers and her red pants show the padded bottom that indicates a diaper beneath. Martínez, face down in the water, has tucked his daughter under his shirt so she won’t be torn away from him in the river. And then there’s this: she clung to him – as I remember my own daughter at that age, clinging to me when I carried her into a hospital, and we were both terrified to death but together, together – because Valeria’s arm is still flung around his neck when they are found.

This is a story about bodies – but not just Valeria’s body, and Martínez’s.

It is a story about the body politic. About how we, the people of this nation, react to a photo that illuminates the lethal consequences of the manipulation and damage that has been done to the asylum process.

By some accounts Valeria’s family had spent months in Mexico waiting to get on a list that might – no guarantees – enable them to lodge their asylum request at a port of entry. The “metering” and “remain in Mexico” policies that Donald Trump has instituted during his tenure have forced some asylum-seeking families – displaced by the climate crisis or grinding poverty or devastating violence – to try and find another way to have their asylum claim heard in the US, even if it is a risky way, even if it means battling a body of water.

Likewise, the administration’s use of the border patrol – and even active-duty military troops – to physically prevent asylum seekers from reaching ports of entry has had a chilling effect on established asylum processes.

Organizations like Human Rights First have proposed a “genuine humanitarian response” to the asylum crisis the administration has created: deploying Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers to ports of entry to assist in asylum processing, appointing more immigration judges and interpreters, along with making immigration courts independent, among other solutions. Other NGOs and agencies used to dealing with refugee and asylee needs from a trauma-informed and humanitarian perspective probably have suggestions and potential solutions, too. And from these we may be able to establish a roadmap that is less oppressive than the one proposed by this administration.

Years ago, when I was envisioning the immigration dystopia that would become my novel Ink, I needed to create a “catalyst” moment, when the public at large became aware of what was happening in the novel’s universe in the same sort of way my protagonists were experiencing it. After a lot of dithering, I finally settled on a photograph of a child as that catalyst, and as it was shared and reshared by news sites and individuals alike, it became a proof and test of my proxy world’s humanity.

I have thought about that a lot in the past two years, as I’ve seen people stirred to action by the photographs of immigrant children separated from their parents by CBP and ICE. And now too, with this photo of Valeria and her dad.

What will the body politic do with the evidence before it?

I hope the answer is that we, as the recently coined hashtag says, will not look away. Because if we do, we will be haunted by more than just a photograph.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
This Is Why We Should Cancel All Student Debt Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=44284"><span class="small">Bernie Sanders, Medium</span></a>   
Wednesday, 26 June 2019 08:21

Sanders writes: "I don't often use this phrase but we are, in fact, offering a 'revolutionary' proposal - a proposal that will transform and improve our country in many ways."

Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: Getty)
Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: Getty)


This Is Why We Should Cancel All Student Debt

By Bernie Sanders, Medium

26 June 19

 

don’t often use this phrase but we are, in fact, offering a “revolutionary” proposal?—?a proposal that will transform and improve our country in many ways.

In a highly competitive global economy, when we need the best educated workforce in the world, this proposal will make it possible for every person in America to get all of the education they need regardless of their financial status. This means not only a college education but the right to enter a trade school or apprenticeship program to acquire the skills needed to become a carpenter, plumber, sheet metal worker or many of the other important jobs that keep our society going.

In other words, we will make a full and complete education a human right to which every American are is entitled. This means making public colleges, universities and HBCUs tuition free and debt free by tripling of the Work Study program, expanding Pell Grants and other financial incentives.

Further, in the wealthiest country in the history of the world, it is simply not acceptable that our younger generation, through no fault of their own, will have a lower standard of living than their parents?—?more debt, lower wages and less likelihood of owning their own homes. That is why this proposal completely eliminates student debt in this country and ends the absurdity of sentencing an entire generation?—?the millennial generation?—?to a lifetime of debt for the “crime” of doing the right thing?—?getting a college education.

Ten years ago the U.S. government bailed out Wall Street after their greed, recklessness and illegal behavior drove us into the worst recession in modern history. Today, the major Wall Street banks are larger than ever, their profits are soaring and their CEOs revive huge compensation packages. Our proposal, which costs $2.2 trillion over ten years, will be fully paid for by a tax on Wall Street speculation?—?similar to what exists in dozens of other countries. The American people bailed out Wall Street, now it is Wall Street’s time to help the working families of this country. This Wall Street tax will have the added benefit of controlling Wall Street recklessness and reducing the likelihood of another major economic crash.

In 1944, as World War II was coming to an end, the U.S. government did the right thing and passed the GI Bill which made free higher education available to all those who served in the Armed Forces. That act not only improved the financial well-being of an entire generation, the Greatest Generation, but it also laid the groundwork for a great expansion of the American middle class.

In the 1960s and 1970s, the federal government and state governments invested heavily in higher education with the result that college tuition was virtually free for millions of young people.

Forty years ago, a federal Pell Grant paid for nearly 80 percent of tuition, fees, room and board at a four-year public college.

Well, sadly, things are different today. Today, it costs over $21,000 each and every year to attend some of those very same schools which 50 years ago were virtually tuition free. Today, Pell Grants cover only about 30 percent of college expenses.

And here are the results of federal and state higher education cutbacks.

Today, the average college senior graduates with about $30,000 in student debt and one out of six seniors will graduate with over $50,000 in debt. The situation is even worse for African American and Latino families. And, at a time when we are in desperate need for more doctors, dentists, and nurses many young people are leaving medical school, dental school or nursing school hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt. And here’s a sad truth. Many students drop out of college because of the cost after accumulating significant debt, and don’t even have a degree to show for their efforts.

Let’s be clear. The millennial generation was told that the only way they would get the good jobs available is if they received a college education. That turned out to be dead wrong.

Since 2000, the cost of attending a public college has nearly doubled. Meanwhile, the bottom 60% of college graduates earn less money than those who graduated college did 19 years ago and wages for the average college graduate have stagnated.

Today, 34% of Americans 25 and older have a college degree, but only 26% of jobs in our country require a college education.

The result is that many millions of young people today are forced to work at low wage jobs, their standard of living is going down, while they are struggling to pay off their outrageously high level of student debt.

The bottom line is we should not be punishing people for getting a college education.

It’s time to hit the reset button.

Under the proposal that we are introducing today, all student debt would be cancelled within 6 months.

By taking this action, we will not only provide immediate financial relief to 45 million Americans who have $1.6 trillion in student debt, we will be improving the entire economy.

According to a study from the Levy Institute, cancelling all student debt would add an estimated $1 trillion to our economy over the next decade and it would create up to 1.5 million jobs a year.

Let me conclude by telling a tale of two crises. In 2008, we bailed out Wall Street to the tune of trillions of dollars after they themselves had caused the crisis.

But today we have ignored the economic distress of millions of Americans who through no fault of their own are now deeply in debt.

It’s time to pay attention to their needs. It is time to act.

It is time to cancel student debt.

It is time to make public colleges and universities tuition free and debt free.

It’s time to create an economy that works for all of us, not just the people on top.

Read a fact sheet on College For All here.

Read the legislative text here.

Read a fact sheet on the Inclusive Prosperity Act to raise revenue for the proposal here.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The Insanity in Oregon Is a Glimpse of Our Very Dark Future Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=11104"><span class="small">Charles Pierce, Esquire</span></a>   
Tuesday, 25 June 2019 13:10

Pierce writes: "In these times, everything looks like an ill omen. The capitol is crowded with crows. But it is not an exaggeration to say that if you're not following the ongoing insanity in Oregon, you are missing a look into a very dark future."

A militia member in Oregon. (photo: AP)
A militia member in Oregon. (photo: AP)


The Insanity in Oregon Is a Glimpse of Our Very Dark Future

By Charles Pierce, Esquire

25 June 19


People with guns have involved themselves in a legislative dispute while the officials of one political party cheer them on.

n these times, everything looks like an ill omen. The capitol is crowded with crows. But it is not an exaggeration to say that if you're not following the ongoing insanity in Oregon, you are missing a look into a very dark future. It begins with a not-at-all-unusual squabble between the Republicans in the Oregon legislature and the Democratic Governor, Kate Brown. At issue is a huge bill aimed at dealing with the climate crisis. On Thursday, every Republican member of the Oregon state senate took a powder, denying Brown and the Democrats a quorum and effectively killing the bill.

Now this is not an unusual tactic. Not long ago, Democratic lawmakers in Texas and in Wisconsin blew town for the same purpose—to throw sand in the gears of a legislative act of which they did not approve and could not stop by conventional means. In Wisconsin, it was to slow down an anti-union measure. In Texas, it was about a redistricting map that gerrymandered the Texas legislature into a farce. The legislative lamsters all had a good time, taking goofy videos in what appeared to be Holiday Inn lobbies while Republicans back home fumed. (The Texans, it should be noted, won a temporary victory.) What makes Oregon different is what the fugitive Republican senators did.

The Republican senators—with the full support of the Oregon Republican Party—made common cause with armed domestic terror groups. (Calling them a militia is a misnomer, regardless of what they may think of themselves.) When a Republican state senator named Brian Boquist heard that Brown was sending the Oregon state police after them, he told a local television station:

Send bachelors and come heavily armed. I’m not going to be a political prisoner in the state of Oregon. It’s just that simple.

Almost immediately, the local domestic terror groups sprang to Boquist's defense. From ThinkProgress:

A member of the Oregon 3 Percenters — a militia group whose members have vowed to combat what they perceive as constitutional infringement — said they would act as the senators’ de-facto bodyguards against the state police. “We have vowed to provide security, transportation and refuge for those Senators in need,” they wrote in a Facebook post. “We will stand together with unwavering resolve, doing whatever it takes to keep these Senators safe.”

In Idaho, where some of the lawmakers have supposedly fled, the state’s 3 Percenters group was similarly willing to defend the Republicans as well, posting threatening memes on its Facebook page. “This is what the start of a civil war looks like,” the group wrote in one post. “Elected officials seeking asylum in a friendly jurisdiction.” Speaking to ThinkProgress, Eric Parker, president of the group Real 3 Percenters Idaho, said the group was currently networking to figure out if Brown had asked for any “out of state resources” — such as help from the FBI or Idaho State Patrol — and were willing to assist the the Republican senators in any way necessary.

And you could find a way to wave this off as well, except for what happened on Saturday. From the Oregonian/OregonLive:

A spokeswoman for the Senate President confirmed late Friday that the "Oregon State Police has recommended that the Capitol be closed tomorrow due to a possible militia threat."

An "Occupy The Senate" rally on Sunday, sponsored by the local and state GOP, seems to have fizzled. (Jason Wilson on the electric Twitter machine is your go-to on this, and he has pictures, including one of a chainsaw the size of a Saturn V.) That doesn't calm me down at all. There has been a wildness in the land for a while now and, at this moment, at the top of the government, we have a president* who's more than willing to give that wildness a purpose and a focus.

People with guns have involved themselves in a legislative dispute while the officials of one of the political parties was rooting them on, and one session of a state legislature was cancelled because of it. Roll that around in your head for a while and see where you end up. Something is building in our politics and now I wish I hadn't watched that series about Chernobyl. We may be exceeding the tolerances of all our systems.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
New Rape Claim Proves That Women Are Worthless in Trump's America Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=49902"><span class="small">Danielle Tcholakian, The Daily Beast</span></a>   
Tuesday, 25 June 2019 13:10

Tcholakian writes: "Temple Taggart McDowell. Cassandra Searles. Jennifer Murphy. Natasha Stoynoff. Mindy McGillivray. Jessica Leeds. Rachel Crooks. Lisa Boyne. Kristin Anderson. Cathy Heller. Karena Virginia. Jessica Drake. Ninni Laaksonen. Juliet Huddy. Tasha Dixon. Jane Does 1, 2, 3, and so on."

E. Jean Carroll. (photo: Eva Deitch/WP/Getty Images)
E. Jean Carroll. (photo: Eva Deitch/WP/Getty Images)


New Rape Claim Proves That Women Are Worthless in Trump's America

By Danielle Tcholakian, The Daily Beast

25 June 19


This is not a media criticism issue. It’s about the public officials we vest with great power who aren’t doing anything more than issuing statements, if that.

emple Taggart McDowell. Cassandra Searles. Jennifer Murphy. Natasha Stoynoff. Mindy McGillivray. Jessica Leeds. Rachel Crooks. Lisa Boyne. Kristin Anderson. Cathy Heller. Karena Virginia. Jessica Drake. Ninni Laaksonen. Juliet Huddy. Tasha Dixon. Jane Does 1, 2, 3, and so on.

A steadfast belief in white people’s right to be innocent until proven guilty in this country has resulted in a system in which rape is a nearly consequence-free offense, particularly for anyone rich enough to throw money at their problems. The nature of sexual crimes means they are almost always witnessed exclusively by the perpetrator and the victim. Even in cases where there is evidence, it is easy enough to claim that a woman who is anything less than a nun in a full habit “asked for it.”

A credibly accused rapist has sat in the White House, flexing a controlling, if often incompetent, hand over the country for 28 months. Most of those accusations surfaced before he won election. They continued to come out after he stepped into the Oval Office, claiming that space as his own with the same derision and spite with which he entered the dressing rooms of naked teenage beauty pageant contestants. He has stood on the White House lawn in ill-fitting suits, sneering and slouching and defending the reputations of men in his employ who were accused of violently abusing women.

There are no content warnings on stories about the United States President. No italicized editor’s note at the top, warning readers that they’ll have to read the name of a credibly accused sexual predator over and over. TV and radio hosts provide no warning before they play clips of his grating, oily voice. There is no concern for the woman whose vision might blur when she hears that voice as she’s driving to work, who will suddenly feel short of breath, who will reach wildly for the dial, desperate to get away from that reminder of this country’s most fundamental truth: Women are worthless in America.

Too dramatic? I disagree. How else should we interpret the fact that this nation elected to its highest office a man who has been accused of rape by this many women? What else should we take away from the inaction in response to these allegations by the entities supposedly meant to check and balance government powers? Why is it OK for members of Congress to simply carry on?

This is not a media criticism issue. What is the media supposed to write this week? Another Woman Details Rape By U.S. President. You’re mad that the New York Times didn’t find an A1 space to follow a book excerpt run in another outlet, or that executive editor Dean Baquet eventually conceded that the paper of record underplayed the story?

I’m mad that the people whose salaries we pay don’t have to answer a single fucking question about what the fuck they’re doing about it. If Congress does not have the power to launch an investigation, to hold hearings for these women, then tell us that. Tell us that you are impotent by design, instead of by choice.

Don’t tap dance around the truth. Don’t call it “those actions” (Julian Castro), “the charges” (Bill de Blasio), “all of this” (Eric Swalwell), “these allegations” (John Delaney), “it” (Andrew Yang), or even “serious allegations” (Kamala Harris) or “very serious charges” (Tim Ryan). It’s not enough. It’s not enough to say there “aren’t any real surprises” (Elizabeth Warren). Calling what Trump is—again—charged with doing “sexual misconduct” (Cory Booker) or even “sexual assault” (Joe Biden) is not enough.

Call it what it is: rape.

Out of respect for the bravery of these traumatized women, and all of the women in this country who are re-traumatized every day that they have to hear his name after the word “president” or hear his voice on their morning commute or the nightly news while they’re making dinner, call it what it fucking is. And tell us what the fuck you’re going to do about it.

You are working with an accused rapist—many times accused. What are you doing about it?

You are not as powerless as we are. You have platforms that we, the people, have given you. Even if you don’t have the legal authority to take action against this person, you can at the very least tell us that you see and share our pain and frustration, and not be silent about it. And if you don’t, all you’re doing is showing us that you’re not fit for the office you hold.

Maybe you don’t believe women will make you pay a political price for this. Maybe you think that by not addressing the accused rapist-in-chief, the worst-case scenario is that victims will be ground down and go silent, and that violent, abusive behavior will become even more accepted, and Democrats will have more reason to avoid policing their own party based on some playground-level finger-pointing of who’s worse.

And perhaps some of us will be ground down, and go silent. It is understandable to see the current situation and decide to go underground: it is logical, rational. What on earth could be the benefit of coming forward in a culture that at best ignores you, and more likely will seek to destroy you? It might also be logical and rational for men to look around and deduce that there are, in fact, no consequences, that they truly can act with impunity against anyone they please.

But it would be dangerous to discount the rest of us, and our growing numbers. We have been radicalized, and every time you try to hide from this ugliness, our radicalization grows.

Temple Taggart McDowell. Cassandra Searles. Jennifer Murphy. Natasha Stoynoff. Mindy McGillivray. Jessica Leeds. Rachel Crooks. Lisa Boyne. Kristin Anderson. Cathy Heller. Karena Virginia. Jessica Drake. Ninni Laaksonen. Juliet Huddy. Tasha Dixon. Jane Does 1, 2, 3, and so on.

Now we add E. Jean Carroll’s name to the roll call. How many more have to come forward and be ignored before this country stops being so surprised that the abused, devalued and discarded bodies of its women are coursing with rage?

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 Next > End >>

Page 847 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN