|
FOCUS: This Photo Is About Bodies - Migrant Bodies, and Our Body Politic. Don't Look Away |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=51051"><span class="small">Sabrina Vourvoulias, Guardian UK</span></a>
|
|
Wednesday, 26 June 2019 10:52 |
|
Vourvoulias writes: "This is a story about bodies. A body of water. A river running through mountain, bosque, desert and city; along two pueblos, between two states and separating two countries."
'You cannot step into the same river twice, but you can step into the same story again and again and again. A story of desperate need and desperate hope that drives people to risk everything in uncertain and unfamiliar waters.' (photo: Julia Le Duc/AP)

This Photo Is About Bodies - Migrant Bodies, and Our Body Politic. Don't Look Away
By Sabrina Vourvoulias, Guardian UK
26 June 19
Monday’s image of a drowned two-year-old and her father will haunt us. I hope it changes us, too
his is a story about bodies.
A body of water. A river running through mountain, bosque, desert and city; along two pueblos, between two states and separating two countries.
I lived beside a running body of water for a time – this is what I learned: it is impossible to ignore its power. It whispers its summons: cross here. Ford the still points. Wade. Float. Swim. Drown.
Once, many years ago, I heard that after a prolonged torrential rainfall the Rio Grande (Rio Bravo del Norte, to Mexicans) had reached unprecedented levels. Its floodwaters swept through a riverfront church, pulled a large wooden cross from the wall and carried it on its current. A woman who had camped out on the Mexican side of the river with her two children, waiting to cross into the US, saw the dark shape in the water. Before it surged past her, she pushed her children into the river, toward it. “Hold on,” she said. “Hold on to it until you reach the other side.”
Maybe she believed they would be borne above the waters by faith. Maybe she so despaired of their survival on her side of the river she was willing to chance it. Maybe someday she might stop replaying the exact moment when she let go of their hands in the water.
You cannot step into the same river twice, but you can step into the same story again and again and again. A story of desperate need and desperate hope that drives people to risk everything in uncertain and unfamiliar waters.
On Monday, Valeria Martínez, a two-year-old Salvadoran child, was found drowned in the shallows of the Rio Grande; her father, Óscar Alberto Martínez, 26, by her side. The photo that circulated is as haunting, in its way, as the 2015 photograph of Alan Kurdi, the three-year-old Syrian child whose image – tiny, lifeless, lying face down in the surf in Greece – moved European leaders to re-examine their policies toward migrants.
In this photo, Valeria wears little black sneakers and her red pants show the padded bottom that indicates a diaper beneath. Martínez, face down in the water, has tucked his daughter under his shirt so she won’t be torn away from him in the river. And then there’s this: she clung to him – as I remember my own daughter at that age, clinging to me when I carried her into a hospital, and we were both terrified to death but together, together – because Valeria’s arm is still flung around his neck when they are found.
This is a story about bodies – but not just Valeria’s body, and Martínez’s.
It is a story about the body politic. About how we, the people of this nation, react to a photo that illuminates the lethal consequences of the manipulation and damage that has been done to the asylum process.
By some accounts Valeria’s family had spent months in Mexico waiting to get on a list that might – no guarantees – enable them to lodge their asylum request at a port of entry. The “metering” and “remain in Mexico” policies that Donald Trump has instituted during his tenure have forced some asylum-seeking families – displaced by the climate crisis or grinding poverty or devastating violence – to try and find another way to have their asylum claim heard in the US, even if it is a risky way, even if it means battling a body of water.
Likewise, the administration’s use of the border patrol – and even active-duty military troops – to physically prevent asylum seekers from reaching ports of entry has had a chilling effect on established asylum processes.
Organizations like Human Rights First have proposed a “genuine humanitarian response” to the asylum crisis the administration has created: deploying Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers to ports of entry to assist in asylum processing, appointing more immigration judges and interpreters, along with making immigration courts independent, among other solutions. Other NGOs and agencies used to dealing with refugee and asylee needs from a trauma-informed and humanitarian perspective probably have suggestions and potential solutions, too. And from these we may be able to establish a roadmap that is less oppressive than the one proposed by this administration.
Years ago, when I was envisioning the immigration dystopia that would become my novel Ink, I needed to create a “catalyst” moment, when the public at large became aware of what was happening in the novel’s universe in the same sort of way my protagonists were experiencing it. After a lot of dithering, I finally settled on a photograph of a child as that catalyst, and as it was shared and reshared by news sites and individuals alike, it became a proof and test of my proxy world’s humanity.
I have thought about that a lot in the past two years, as I’ve seen people stirred to action by the photographs of immigrant children separated from their parents by CBP and ICE. And now too, with this photo of Valeria and her dad.
What will the body politic do with the evidence before it?
I hope the answer is that we, as the recently coined hashtag says, will not look away. Because if we do, we will be haunted by more than just a photograph.

|
|
This Is Why We Should Cancel All Student Debt |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=44284"><span class="small">Bernie Sanders, Medium</span></a>
|
|
Wednesday, 26 June 2019 08:21 |
|
Sanders writes: "I don't often use this phrase but we are, in fact, offering a 'revolutionary' proposal - a proposal that will transform and improve our country in many ways."
Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: Getty)

This Is Why We Should Cancel All Student Debt
By Bernie Sanders, Medium
26 June 19
don’t often use this phrase but we are, in fact, offering a “revolutionary” proposal?—?a proposal that will transform and improve our country in many ways.
In a highly competitive global economy, when we need the best educated workforce in the world, this proposal will make it possible for every person in America to get all of the education they need regardless of their financial status. This means not only a college education but the right to enter a trade school or apprenticeship program to acquire the skills needed to become a carpenter, plumber, sheet metal worker or many of the other important jobs that keep our society going.
In other words, we will make a full and complete education a human right to which every American are is entitled. This means making public colleges, universities and HBCUs tuition free and debt free by tripling of the Work Study program, expanding Pell Grants and other financial incentives.
Further, in the wealthiest country in the history of the world, it is simply not acceptable that our younger generation, through no fault of their own, will have a lower standard of living than their parents?—?more debt, lower wages and less likelihood of owning their own homes. That is why this proposal completely eliminates student debt in this country and ends the absurdity of sentencing an entire generation?—?the millennial generation?—?to a lifetime of debt for the “crime” of doing the right thing?—?getting a college education.
Ten years ago the U.S. government bailed out Wall Street after their greed, recklessness and illegal behavior drove us into the worst recession in modern history. Today, the major Wall Street banks are larger than ever, their profits are soaring and their CEOs revive huge compensation packages. Our proposal, which costs $2.2 trillion over ten years, will be fully paid for by a tax on Wall Street speculation?—?similar to what exists in dozens of other countries. The American people bailed out Wall Street, now it is Wall Street’s time to help the working families of this country. This Wall Street tax will have the added benefit of controlling Wall Street recklessness and reducing the likelihood of another major economic crash.
In 1944, as World War II was coming to an end, the U.S. government did the right thing and passed the GI Bill which made free higher education available to all those who served in the Armed Forces. That act not only improved the financial well-being of an entire generation, the Greatest Generation, but it also laid the groundwork for a great expansion of the American middle class.
In the 1960s and 1970s, the federal government and state governments invested heavily in higher education with the result that college tuition was virtually free for millions of young people.
Forty years ago, a federal Pell Grant paid for nearly 80 percent of tuition, fees, room and board at a four-year public college.
Well, sadly, things are different today. Today, it costs over $21,000 each and every year to attend some of those very same schools which 50 years ago were virtually tuition free. Today, Pell Grants cover only about 30 percent of college expenses.
And here are the results of federal and state higher education cutbacks.
Today, the average college senior graduates with about $30,000 in student debt and one out of six seniors will graduate with over $50,000 in debt. The situation is even worse for African American and Latino families. And, at a time when we are in desperate need for more doctors, dentists, and nurses many young people are leaving medical school, dental school or nursing school hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt. And here’s a sad truth. Many students drop out of college because of the cost after accumulating significant debt, and don’t even have a degree to show for their efforts.
Let’s be clear. The millennial generation was told that the only way they would get the good jobs available is if they received a college education. That turned out to be dead wrong.
Since 2000, the cost of attending a public college has nearly doubled. Meanwhile, the bottom 60% of college graduates earn less money than those who graduated college did 19 years ago and wages for the average college graduate have stagnated.
Today, 34% of Americans 25 and older have a college degree, but only 26% of jobs in our country require a college education.
The result is that many millions of young people today are forced to work at low wage jobs, their standard of living is going down, while they are struggling to pay off their outrageously high level of student debt.
The bottom line is we should not be punishing people for getting a college education.
It’s time to hit the reset button.
Under the proposal that we are introducing today, all student debt would be cancelled within 6 months.
By taking this action, we will not only provide immediate financial relief to 45 million Americans who have $1.6 trillion in student debt, we will be improving the entire economy.
According to a study from the Levy Institute, cancelling all student debt would add an estimated $1 trillion to our economy over the next decade and it would create up to 1.5 million jobs a year.
Let me conclude by telling a tale of two crises. In 2008, we bailed out Wall Street to the tune of trillions of dollars after they themselves had caused the crisis.
But today we have ignored the economic distress of millions of Americans who through no fault of their own are now deeply in debt.
It’s time to pay attention to their needs. It is time to act.
It is time to cancel student debt.
It is time to make public colleges and universities tuition free and debt free.
It’s time to create an economy that works for all of us, not just the people on top.
Read a fact sheet on College For All here.
Read the legislative text here.
Read a fact sheet on the Inclusive Prosperity Act to raise revenue for the proposal here.

|
|
|
The Insanity in Oregon Is a Glimpse of Our Very Dark Future |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=11104"><span class="small">Charles Pierce, Esquire</span></a>
|
|
Tuesday, 25 June 2019 13:10 |
|
Pierce writes: "In these times, everything looks like an ill omen. The capitol is crowded with crows. But it is not an exaggeration to say that if you're not following the ongoing insanity in Oregon, you are missing a look into a very dark future."
A militia member in Oregon. (photo: AP)

The Insanity in Oregon Is a Glimpse of Our Very Dark Future
By Charles Pierce, Esquire
25 June 19
People with guns have involved themselves in a legislative dispute while the officials of one political party cheer them on.
n these times, everything looks like an ill omen. The capitol is crowded with crows. But it is not an exaggeration to say that if you're not following the ongoing insanity in Oregon, you are missing a look into a very dark future. It begins with a not-at-all-unusual squabble between the Republicans in the Oregon legislature and the Democratic Governor, Kate Brown. At issue is a huge bill aimed at dealing with the climate crisis. On Thursday, every Republican member of the Oregon state senate took a powder, denying Brown and the Democrats a quorum and effectively killing the bill.
Now this is not an unusual tactic. Not long ago, Democratic lawmakers in Texas and in Wisconsin blew town for the same purpose—to throw sand in the gears of a legislative act of which they did not approve and could not stop by conventional means. In Wisconsin, it was to slow down an anti-union measure. In Texas, it was about a redistricting map that gerrymandered the Texas legislature into a farce. The legislative lamsters all had a good time, taking goofy videos in what appeared to be Holiday Inn lobbies while Republicans back home fumed. (The Texans, it should be noted, won a temporary victory.) What makes Oregon different is what the fugitive Republican senators did.
The Republican senators—with the full support of the Oregon Republican Party—made common cause with armed domestic terror groups. (Calling them a militia is a misnomer, regardless of what they may think of themselves.) When a Republican state senator named Brian Boquist heard that Brown was sending the Oregon state police after them, he told a local television station:
Send bachelors and come heavily armed. I’m not going to be a political prisoner in the state of Oregon. It’s just that simple.
Almost immediately, the local domestic terror groups sprang to Boquist's defense. From ThinkProgress:
A member of the Oregon 3 Percenters — a militia group whose members have vowed to combat what they perceive as constitutional infringement — said they would act as the senators’ de-facto bodyguards against the state police. “We have vowed to provide security, transportation and refuge for those Senators in need,” they wrote in a Facebook post. “We will stand together with unwavering resolve, doing whatever it takes to keep these Senators safe.”
In Idaho, where some of the lawmakers have supposedly fled, the state’s 3 Percenters group was similarly willing to defend the Republicans as well, posting threatening memes on its Facebook page. “This is what the start of a civil war looks like,” the group wrote in one post. “Elected officials seeking asylum in a friendly jurisdiction.” Speaking to ThinkProgress, Eric Parker, president of the group Real 3 Percenters Idaho, said the group was currently networking to figure out if Brown had asked for any “out of state resources” — such as help from the FBI or Idaho State Patrol — and were willing to assist the the Republican senators in any way necessary.
And you could find a way to wave this off as well, except for what happened on Saturday. From the Oregonian/OregonLive:
A spokeswoman for the Senate President confirmed late Friday that the "Oregon State Police has recommended that the Capitol be closed tomorrow due to a possible militia threat."
An "Occupy The Senate" rally on Sunday, sponsored by the local and state GOP, seems to have fizzled. (Jason Wilson on the electric Twitter machine is your go-to on this, and he has pictures, including one of a chainsaw the size of a Saturn V.) That doesn't calm me down at all. There has been a wildness in the land for a while now and, at this moment, at the top of the government, we have a president* who's more than willing to give that wildness a purpose and a focus.
People with guns have involved themselves in a legislative dispute while the officials of one of the political parties was rooting them on, and one session of a state legislature was cancelled because of it. Roll that around in your head for a while and see where you end up. Something is building in our politics and now I wish I hadn't watched that series about Chernobyl. We may be exceeding the tolerances of all our systems.

|
|
New Rape Claim Proves That Women Are Worthless in Trump's America |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=49902"><span class="small">Danielle Tcholakian, The Daily Beast</span></a>
|
|
Tuesday, 25 June 2019 13:10 |
|
Tcholakian writes: "Temple Taggart McDowell. Cassandra Searles. Jennifer Murphy. Natasha Stoynoff. Mindy McGillivray. Jessica Leeds. Rachel Crooks. Lisa Boyne. Kristin Anderson. Cathy Heller. Karena Virginia. Jessica Drake. Ninni Laaksonen. Juliet Huddy. Tasha Dixon. Jane Does 1, 2, 3, and so on."
E. Jean Carroll. (photo: Eva Deitch/WP/Getty Images)

New Rape Claim Proves That Women Are Worthless in Trump's America
By Danielle Tcholakian, The Daily Beast
25 June 19
This is not a media criticism issue. It’s about the public officials we vest with great power who aren’t doing anything more than issuing statements, if that.
emple Taggart McDowell. Cassandra Searles. Jennifer Murphy. Natasha Stoynoff. Mindy McGillivray. Jessica Leeds. Rachel Crooks. Lisa Boyne. Kristin Anderson. Cathy Heller. Karena Virginia. Jessica Drake. Ninni Laaksonen. Juliet Huddy. Tasha Dixon. Jane Does 1, 2, 3, and so on.
A steadfast belief in white people’s right to be innocent until proven guilty in this country has resulted in a system in which rape is a nearly consequence-free offense, particularly for anyone rich enough to throw money at their problems. The nature of sexual crimes means they are almost always witnessed exclusively by the perpetrator and the victim. Even in cases where there is evidence, it is easy enough to claim that a woman who is anything less than a nun in a full habit “asked for it.”
A credibly accused rapist has sat in the White House, flexing a controlling, if often incompetent, hand over the country for 28 months. Most of those accusations surfaced before he won election. They continued to come out after he stepped into the Oval Office, claiming that space as his own with the same derision and spite with which he entered the dressing rooms of naked teenage beauty pageant contestants. He has stood on the White House lawn in ill-fitting suits, sneering and slouching and defending the reputations of men in his employ who were accused of violently abusing women.
There are no content warnings on stories about the United States President. No italicized editor’s note at the top, warning readers that they’ll have to read the name of a credibly accused sexual predator over and over. TV and radio hosts provide no warning before they play clips of his grating, oily voice. There is no concern for the woman whose vision might blur when she hears that voice as she’s driving to work, who will suddenly feel short of breath, who will reach wildly for the dial, desperate to get away from that reminder of this country’s most fundamental truth: Women are worthless in America.
Too dramatic? I disagree. How else should we interpret the fact that this nation elected to its highest office a man who has been accused of rape by this many women? What else should we take away from the inaction in response to these allegations by the entities supposedly meant to check and balance government powers? Why is it OK for members of Congress to simply carry on?
This is not a media criticism issue. What is the media supposed to write this week? Another Woman Details Rape By U.S. President. You’re mad that the New York Times didn’t find an A1 space to follow a book excerpt run in another outlet, or that executive editor Dean Baquet eventually conceded that the paper of record underplayed the story?
I’m mad that the people whose salaries we pay don’t have to answer a single fucking question about what the fuck they’re doing about it. If Congress does not have the power to launch an investigation, to hold hearings for these women, then tell us that. Tell us that you are impotent by design, instead of by choice.
Don’t tap dance around the truth. Don’t call it “those actions” (Julian Castro), “the charges” (Bill de Blasio), “all of this” (Eric Swalwell), “these allegations” (John Delaney), “it” (Andrew Yang), or even “serious allegations” (Kamala Harris) or “very serious charges” (Tim Ryan). It’s not enough. It’s not enough to say there “aren’t any real surprises” (Elizabeth Warren). Calling what Trump is—again—charged with doing “sexual misconduct” (Cory Booker) or even “sexual assault” (Joe Biden) is not enough.
Call it what it is: rape.
Out of respect for the bravery of these traumatized women, and all of the women in this country who are re-traumatized every day that they have to hear his name after the word “president” or hear his voice on their morning commute or the nightly news while they’re making dinner, call it what it fucking is. And tell us what the fuck you’re going to do about it.
You are working with an accused rapist—many times accused. What are you doing about it?
You are not as powerless as we are. You have platforms that we, the people, have given you. Even if you don’t have the legal authority to take action against this person, you can at the very least tell us that you see and share our pain and frustration, and not be silent about it. And if you don’t, all you’re doing is showing us that you’re not fit for the office you hold.
Maybe you don’t believe women will make you pay a political price for this. Maybe you think that by not addressing the accused rapist-in-chief, the worst-case scenario is that victims will be ground down and go silent, and that violent, abusive behavior will become even more accepted, and Democrats will have more reason to avoid policing their own party based on some playground-level finger-pointing of who’s worse.
And perhaps some of us will be ground down, and go silent. It is understandable to see the current situation and decide to go underground: it is logical, rational. What on earth could be the benefit of coming forward in a culture that at best ignores you, and more likely will seek to destroy you? It might also be logical and rational for men to look around and deduce that there are, in fact, no consequences, that they truly can act with impunity against anyone they please.
But it would be dangerous to discount the rest of us, and our growing numbers. We have been radicalized, and every time you try to hide from this ugliness, our radicalization grows.
Temple Taggart McDowell. Cassandra Searles. Jennifer Murphy. Natasha Stoynoff. Mindy McGillivray. Jessica Leeds. Rachel Crooks. Lisa Boyne. Kristin Anderson. Cathy Heller. Karena Virginia. Jessica Drake. Ninni Laaksonen. Juliet Huddy. Tasha Dixon. Jane Does 1, 2, 3, and so on.
Now we add E. Jean Carroll’s name to the roll call. How many more have to come forward and be ignored before this country stops being so surprised that the abused, devalued and discarded bodies of its women are coursing with rage?

|
|