RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
RSN: New Progressive Campaign to "Vote Trump Out" in Swing States Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=55540"><span class="small">RootsAction, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Wednesday, 05 August 2020 11:12

Excerpt: "The campaign will urge progressives in the dozen battleground states to vote for Joe Biden rather than sit out the election or cast a third-party protest vote."

Donald Trump. (photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Donald Trump. (photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images)


ALSO SEE: 'We Have to Get Rid of Trump': Pro-Bernie Group
Launches Effort to Boost Biden

New Progressive Campaign to "Vote Trump Out" in Swing States

By RootsAction, Reader Supported News

05 August 20

 

he national activist group RootsAction.org announced today that it is launching a grassroots campaign aimed at “swing voters on the left” to persuade supporters of Bernie Sanders and other progressives in swing states to “Vote Trump Out – and Then Challenge Biden.”    

The Vote Trump Out swing-states initiative will include a highly-targeted social-media program and other digital outreach, utilizing messages from national and state progressive luminaries – people who are widely respected on the left in ways that establishment Democrats are not. The campaign will urge progressives in the dozen battleground states to vote for Joe Biden rather than sit out the election or cast a third-party protest vote. Directed heavily toward young people, the effort will be entirely independent of – and often in opposition to – corporate Democratic leaders.

The RootsAction campaign has assembled a group of national endorsers who are likely to be persuasive to progressives on the fence about voting for Biden. They include: Ady Barkan, Medea Benjamin, Leslie Cagan, Noam Chomsky, Marjorie Cohn, RoseAnn DeMoro, Barbara Ehrenreich, Daniel Ellsberg, Bill Fletcher Jr., Jim Hightower, Rep. Ro Khanna, Jamie Margolin, Bill McKibben, Annabel Park, Linda Sarsour, Winnie Wong and James Zogby.    

The #VoteTrumpOut campaign will assert that – while President Trump is unfailingly immune to progressive persuasion or protest – the fight for a full progressive agenda (ranging from major climate initiatives and anti-racism to universal healthcare, free public college and taxing the wealthy) would have the potential to win some victories with Biden in the White House.    

The campaign’s mission statement declares: “We are not going to minimize our disagreements with Joe Biden. But we’re also clear-eyed about where things stand: supporting the Democratic nominee in swing states is the only way to defeat Trump.... If Biden wins, we’ll be at his door on day one, demanding the kinds of structural reforms that advance racial, economic and environmental justice.”

Renowned linguist, author and political activist Noam Chomsky contributed this comment to the initiative: “I live in the swing state of Arizona, and I’d vote for a lamp post to get Trump out.” Chomsky is featured in a campaign-launch video on the Vote Trump Out website.  

“Our organization fought fiercely in the primaries for Bernie and against Biden,” said RootsAction.org cofounders Jeff Cohen and Norman Solomon. “But the general election is far less about Biden than it is about Trump – the most dangerous president in modern U.S. history, who opposes virtually every policy and principle that progressives are fighting for.” 

Founded in 2011 as an independent progressive force, RootsAction.org now has 1.2 million active supporters online in the United States. 



Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Trump Doesn't Need the Most Votes. What if He Doesn't Even Want Them? Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=50866"><span class="small">Jamelle Bouie, The New York Times</span></a>   
Wednesday, 05 August 2020 08:18

Bouie writes: "Nearly everyone involved in reporting on, analyzing or forecasting the upcoming presidential election agrees that Donald Trump could win another term in office. But no one save his most dedicated sycophants thinks he could do so with a majority of the public on his side."

Donald Trump. (photo: Damon Winter/NYT)
Donald Trump. (photo: Damon Winter/NYT)


Trump Doesn't Need the Most Votes. What if He Doesn't Even Want Them?

By Jamelle Bouie, The New York Times

05 August 20


Government of the minority, chosen by a minority, on behalf of a minority, is not what Lincoln had in mind at Gettysburg.

early everyone involved in reporting on, analyzing or forecasting the upcoming presidential election agrees that Donald Trump could win another term in office. But no one save his most dedicated sycophants thinks he could do so with a majority of the public on his side. We have accepted, as a matter of course, that Trump could be constitutionally re-elected through the Electoral College, but not democratically selected by the voting public.

That’s how he won in 2016, and the reason is straightforward. Enough of the president’s base is concentrated in swing states like Florida, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Because of that fact, he can lose by as many as five million votes and still win an Electoral College majority.

As much as this contradicts our democratic expectations, you can imagine a scenario where, aware of his minority position, Trump governed with an eye toward consensus and popular legitimacy. The Electoral College misfire would have been a problem, but not a dangerous one. Instead, President Trump and his allies embraced this plainly anti-democratic feature of our political system to liberate themselves from majoritarian politics and coalition building. It’s not just that they can win with a plurality, but that they intend to, with no interest in persuading the majority of American voters and no concern for the consequences of that choice.

READ MORE

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Biden Leading Trump Among Voters Who Favor Being Alive Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=9160"><span class="small">Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker</span></a>   
Tuesday, 04 August 2020 12:59

Borowitz writes: "With fewer than a hundred days until the election, Donald J. Trump is trailing Joe Biden badly among voters who describe themselves as in favor of being alive."

Former vice president and Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden greets the crowd at The Galivants Ferry Stump on September 16, 2019, in Galivants Ferry, South Carolina. (photo: Sean Rayford/Getty Images)
Former vice president and Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden greets the crowd at The Galivants Ferry Stump on September 16, 2019, in Galivants Ferry, South Carolina. (photo: Sean Rayford/Getty Images)


Biden Leading Trump Among Voters Who Favor Being Alive

By Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker

04 August 20

 

The article below is satire. Andy Borowitz is an American comedian and New York Times-bestselling author who satirizes the news for his column, "The Borowitz Report."


ith fewer than a hundred days until the election, Donald J. Trump is trailing Joe Biden badly among voters who describe themselves as in favor of being alive.

The poll, which was conducted by the University of Minnesota, shows Biden beating Trump by a whopping thirty-one per cent among voters who call continuing to exist the issue that is most important to them.

In several swing states, including Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, Biden has wiped out Trump’s lead by racking up huge margins among the rather-not-die-right-now demographic.

“Trump needs to do something dramatic to show voters that he, too, is in favor of them staying alive,” Davis Logsdon, who supervised the poll, said. “I’m not sure that shooting rubber bullets and tear gas at them sends that message.”

Trump’s new campaign manager, Bill Stepien, accused the media of focussing too much attention on the opinions of voters who wish to continue to breathe because of the press’s own “anti-dying bias.”

“This campaign is working overtime to identify voters who are not in favor of being alive and make sure they know that President Trump is on their side,” he said.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
RSN: In the Strangest Country on Earth Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=27921"><span class="small">Mort Rosenblum, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Tuesday, 04 August 2020 12:16

Rosenblum writes: "It is lunacy to open schools too early, the Fruit Lady told me, and after driving a school bus for 41 years she ought to know. 'Those kids are all arms and mouths,' she said. 'Tell them anything, and their first word is 'Why?'"

Donald Trump supporters. (photo: Damon Winter/NYT)
Donald Trump supporters. (photo: Damon Winter/NYT)


In the Strangest Country on Earth

By Mort Rosenblum, Reader Supported News

04 August 20

 

RO VALLEY, Arizona – It is lunacy to open schools too early, the Fruit Lady told me, and after driving a school bus for 41 years she ought to know. “Those kids are all arms and mouths,” she said. “Tell them anything, and their first word is ‘Why?’”

“You think they’ll keep safe distances?” she asked. It wasn’t a question. “Little ones are all over each other. They hug you, sneeze on you. Middle-school kids are the worst, spoiled by busy parents. How do you protect teachers, staff – or bus drivers?”

The Fruit Lady is the sort of voter Democrats need in purple states like Arizona. She is 69, retired, and divorced after 45 years when her husband got fed up with peaches. With part-time hired help, her pick-’em-yourself orchard hasn’t made money in two years.

Rising prices eat into her pension and social security checks. Tax cuts for the rich paid for more fancy houses along the highway north of Tucson but did not trickle down to her hardscrabble acre or the clapped-out ex-mobile homes on rutted roads behind them.

And now a killer plague stalks the state, getting steadily worse despite nonsensical happy talk from a president who allowed it to run wild yet demands that schools and businesses get going again. She sticks close to home with her trees and tomato vines.

After we talked for a while, the Fruit Lady sniffed out a likely liberal. “I should tell you,” she said, “I’m for Trump.” 

I left Tucson in 1967 for a life as a foreign correspondent, eager to probe all those corrupt, dysfunctional societies I’d read about. After poking into the depths on six continents, I have found the strangest of them all right here where I started out.

The Fruit Lady has a name, and her quotes should be attributed. When I first reported around here as a student, we even added street addresses. It is a different America now. First Amendment aside, people worry about what they say in public.

Polls and pundits mislead. That hoary “silent majority” is all over the place. Facts are what anyone thinks they are. Labels replace nuanced analysis. A wannabe despot condones wholesale death to get reelected. His cultists find someone else to blame.

Trump people with bedsheet-sized flags and bumper stickers are easy to spot but hard to interview. They know they’re right. Period. But the kindly Fruit Lady likes to talk. I battled wasps for a basket of ripe peaches and then sat down with her.

“Oh, I know he is arrogant,” she said, “but he says what he means, and he’s doing a good job.” Joe Biden? “He’s an idiot, and he has dementia. My sister knows dementia, and he has it.” I asked if she had other sources.

“I listen to Fox sometimes,” she said. She won’t look at the Arizona Daily Star, owned by a conservative chain. “It’s a liberal rag.” I asked what she read instead. “Just the Bible.” But is Trump a good Christian? “The Lord works in mysterious ways.”

She wants the Wall, the higher the better. After 45 years in a place Mexicans settled seven generations ago, making a desert bloom, she learns from Trump they are rapists and murderers. “With me here alone,” she said, “I don’t trust them on my property.” 

She denies climate change despite a freak lightning storm that ignited dry pines and burned 120,000 acres of the nearby mountain. Heat rises each year as endemic drought worsens. Scant rain falls at the wrong time for crop cycles. She irrigates from a dwindling aquifer and doesn’t worry about it. In any case, Judgment Day is nigh.

“The world is coming to an end,” she said. Devout Christians will go to heaven – you, too, she added, because Jesus was a Jew – but all those Muslims and Buddhists and whatnot will find that a 110-degree Tucson summer is chilly compared to what awaits them.

And Covid-19? “I turn off the news when they talk about it,” she said. It’s a plot by the godless Chinese that the Lord will sort out. “We should have nothing to do with them. Around here, when people see something made in China, they refuse to buy it.” 

But, I said, after the Chinese tried to hide it, they came clean on January 9 and airlifted protective gear to America. Trump at first praised China’s reaction. He called the virus a Democratic hoax until mid-March. She gave me that look: don’t waste your breath.

“The China virus” is Trump’s gospel, and Republican candidates play that to the hilt – no one more than Martha McSally, now fighting for her appointed Senate seat. Driving home, I passed the Safeway that now symbolizes how badly America has gone wrong.

In 2011, Rep. Gabrielle Giffords drew a crowd outside the Safeway for her usual “Congress on Your Corner” parlay with constituents. A drug-addled, rightwing misogynist opened fire with a 9mm pistol, killing six and wounding 20 more. Giffords barely survived a shot to the head.

McSally lost the Republican primary in a special election, and then the next general election to replace Giffords. She succeeded in 2014, winning a House seat by 67 votes after five weeks of recounts. In 2018, she ran for the Senate, and Kyrsten Sinema beat her. But the governor later named her to fill John McCain’s empty chair.

McSally opposes Mark Kelly, Gabby Gifford’s popular astronaut husband against whom her “I-was-a-pilot” sounds lame. The Democrats say Mitch McConnell has put at least $20 million in PAC funds into her campaign, desperate to keep her shaky seat.

“China is to blame for this pandemic and the death of thousands of Americans,” one McSally ad says, with a Bloomberg news clip saying the Chinese hid the early outbreak. A close look shows it is dated January 4, five days before China shared genome sequences.

Then it got personal. An ad claimed Kelly invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in China. In fact, those were mutual funds, including Chinese securities, he had already sold. She, however, disclosed last August that her own funds held Chinese stocks, including Tencent, which invested in World View Enterprises. Which takes this deeper.

In 2012, World View’s co-directors persuaded county supervisors to build a $15 million spaceport in Tucson for high-flying tourism. Kelly was hired to manage flight crews. New people now run the company, Kelly moved on, and the spaceport is still there. McSally’s ad saying Kelly “ripped off taxpayers for $15 million” is an outrageous lie.

McSally, after criticizing Trump before he was elected, cheers his every move. She was the one who sneered at a polite question from Manu Raju of CNN. “You’re a liberal hack,” she said, “I’m not talking to you.” Then she boasted about that on social media.  

These mosaic pieces reveal a corrupted, ill-informed nation in which truth matters less by the month. So far, political vitriol plays out largely in dueling yard signs. Still, the potential is frightening in a nation armed to the teeth.

As Covid-19 rages on and artificial Wall Street underpinnings erode toward collapse, it is likely a Biden administration will veer back toward sanity. But the place I left in the 1960s, the land of the free and the home of the brave, has changed beyond recognition.

Next door to the Fruit Lady, a sign on the lawn reflects a different  extreme: “Any Functioning Adult – 2020.” I would have gone in to ask questions, but another sign on the high chain-link fence read in bold letters: “Beware of the dogs.” 



Mort Rosenblum has reported from seven continents as Associated Press special correspondent, edited the International Herald Tribune in Paris, and written 14 books on subjects ranging from global geopolitics to chocolate. He now runs MortReport.org.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: How Trump Could Steal the Election Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=51672"><span class="small">Mark Joesph Stern, Slate</span></a>   
Tuesday, 04 August 2020 10:52

Stern writes: "It is the late evening of Nov. 3, 2020 - Election Day. The race is tight. It's come down to the three states that President Donald Trump barely won in 2016."

'Thanks in no small part to Trump's endless demonization of mail-in ballots, there is a sharp partisan split on the issue.' (photo: Elaine Thompson/AP)
'Thanks in no small part to Trump's endless demonization of mail-in ballots, there is a sharp partisan split on the issue.' (photo: Elaine Thompson/AP)


How Trump Could Steal the Election

By Mark Joseph Stern, Slate

04 August 20


One increasingly likely scenario where everything goes wrong.

t is the late evening of Nov. 3, 2020—Election Day. The race is tight. It’s come down to the three states that President Donald Trump barely won in 2016: Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Most in-person votes have been counted, and Trump holds a small lead in each state. But there are millions of mail-in ballots that election officials have not yet processed. Hundreds of thousands of voters dropped their ballots in the mail days ago, but they haven’t been received. Meanwhile, thousands of ballots that were mailed in time have been rejected due to alleged technical defects. The outcome of the election turns on all these outstanding votes. But Trump, on the basis of the results so far, declares victory and dismisses the remaining mail-in ballots as fraudulent and illegitimate. The Republican-controlled legislatures of all three states agree, assigning their electoral votes to the president. Trump has secured a second term in the White House.

This scenario is not paranoid or outlandish. It is now chillingly plausible. Trump has spent several months laying the groundwork to steal the 2020 election this way. He has tweeted that mail-in voting will make this “the most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history.” Trump probably senses the vote count will not be completed on Election Day and seems to be seeding doubt before a single vote is cast. The Republican Party has largely backed the presidents’ schemes, and the courts have resisted intervening to protect voting rights. Three months out from Election Day, the nation appears to be barreling toward a crisis of Trump’s own design.

The United States has never held a presidential election during a nationwide pandemic. Polls present an obvious risk for COVID-19 infection: They require many people, including seniors, to congregate indoors, where the likelihood of transmission is highest. If lawmakers valued democracy over partisan gain, the country could undoubtedly meet this novel challenge. States can avoid this problem by letting everybody vote by mail, and by allowing multiple weeks of early voting at the polls. By spreading out the in-person vote over a few weeks, states can prevent too many people from gathering together at once.

Democrats have almost universally endorsed these measures, particularly universal vote by mail, which presents zero risk of COVID-19 infection. Republican politicians increasingly oppose vote by mail, though it remains popular with many GOP voters. This partisan divide is a fairly new phenomenon: Many red states have adopted no-excuse absentee voting, which allows anybody to mail in their ballot. Every swing state has this policy, as well. Trump can disparage vote by mail all he wants. But thanks to the Electoral College, every American whose vote actually matters already has the option to vote absentee.

But will their votes count? Here is where both Trump and Republican lawmakers still have leverage. Vote by mail rests on the presumption that the U.S. Postal Service can deliver ballots to election officials promptly. Yet Trump is now sabotaging the USPS just when Americans need it most. On Thursday, the Washington Post published an explosive exposé about a catastrophe currently unfolding at the agency. The newly appointed postmaster general, Louis DeJoy, is a top Trump donor and fundraiser with absolutely no prior experience at the Postal Service. He has imposed strict measures ostensibly meant to cut costs. While carriers previously made multiple trips to ensure the day’s mail is delivered, they are now required to leave mail behind instead of working overtime. Carriers must also shut down mail sorting machines earlier than before, forcing them to sort more mail by hand, an error-prone process. DeJoy’s policies have, predictably, begun to delay mail by several days.

These delays will make all the difference in November. USPS, like most states, is not remotely prepared for the flood of mail-in ballots just around the corner. Around the country, there has been a tidal wave of absentee ballot requests, a historic surge that has already begun to overwhelm election officials. Yet Republican legislators in many states refuse to provide the necessary funds, resources, and personnel to handle all these ballots. During Wisconsin’s April election, we saw what happens when a state underestimates the demand for mail-in ballots: Election officials just can’t process them in time. At least 9,000 voters never received their requested absentee ballots, and an unknown number—probably many more—got their ballots too late to mail them back in time.

Add Postal Service delays to the mix and you have a recipe for an election meltdown. As the Washington Post’s Greg Sargent has pointed out, every swing state except North Carolina counts only those mail-in ballots received by Election Day. If a ballot is postmarked by Election Day but delivered late, these states will not count them. Democratic election lawyer Marc Elias has filed lawsuits challenging this practice. But the U.S. Supreme Court’s five conservative justices made it clear that they do not think states are obligated to count late ballots postmarked by Election Day—even if the ballots were delayed by forces beyond a voter’s control. Elias has turned to state Supreme Courts for relief, but he has not yet had much luck. Indeed, by a 4–3 vote last Friday, the Michigan Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to the nullification of late ballots with a timely postmark. Its decision effectively ensures that the policy will stay in force through November.

Even those voters who do return their absentee ballots by Election Day are not out of the woods. Most states verify these ballots through a process called “signature mismatch”: Election officials compare the signature on the ballot to the signature on file to see if they match. These officials typically have little or no training in handwriting analysis—but even if they did, the procedure would be useless: Forensic document examiners have testified that even an expert requires at least 10 signature samples to account for normal variations. Election officials have two. This method is discriminatory, too: Voters who are disabled, young, elderly, or non-native English speakers are disproportionately disenfranchised by signature mismatch laws.

Swing states have a hodgepodge of laws that, in theory, let voters “cure” a ballot that was voided because of a signature mismatch. Few voters navigate these rules successfully, and they are often implemented differently from county to county. In Pennsylvania and Michigan, for instance, officials are not required to notify voters that their ballots have been tossed out. In Wisconsin, voters do receive notice—but they must provide a new signature by the close of polls on Election Day. (Other states give voters two weeks after the election to cure their ballots.) By the time Wisconsin voters learn their ballot has been rejected due to signature mismatch, it will likely be too late for them to cure it.

All these complications work to Trump’s advantage, which is presumably why Republican legislators refuse to address them. Thanks in no small part to Trump’s endless demonization of mail-in ballots, there is a sharp partisan split on the issue: Far more Democrats than Republicans plan to vote by mail in November. So a majority of rejected absentee ballots will probably contain votes for Democrats, including Joe Biden. Moreover, these ballots are frequently counted after the in-person vote; in Michigan, officials cannot even open them until Election Day. (Republican legislators have rebuffed Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s pleas to change this pointless law.) If the in-person vote is disproportionately Republican, then Election Day returns could show Trump ahead in the key swing states. At that point, he can declare victory and proclaim the uncounted ballots are fraudulent. He has previewed this tactic for months now and openly cast doubt on the legitimacy of mailed ballots.

Trump, of course, cannot single-handedly halt the vote count in every swing state. But he might not need to. Although every state now holds popular elections for the president, the Constitution grants state legislatures the power to appoint electors. The legislatures of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin are all controlled by Republicans. These bodies could quickly pass resolutions declaring Trump the victor, then appoint electors who will cast their votes for him. This gambit has never been tested in court, but it is possible to imagine the Supreme Court’s conservatives permitting it as a valid exercise of state legislatures’ constitutional authority.

There are steps Democrats can take right now to combat these schemes, beginning with a non-negotiable demand for sufficient USPS funding. Trump and his allies, however, have already laid the landmines, and the judiciary appears unwilling to defuse them. The odds were already stacked against Biden, who must win the popular vote by several points in order to secure the Electoral College. But now he may have to win in a landslide to wrestle the presidency from Trump.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 Next > End >>

Page 401 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN