RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Donald Trump Is Undermining Social Security - Will Democrats Stop Him? Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=55478"><span class="small">Ari Rabin-Havt, Jacobin</span></a>   
Wednesday, 09 September 2020 08:16

Excerpt: "Donald Trump's plan to suspend the collection of the payroll tax risks both the financial well-being of workers and Social Security. Instead of outsourcing the case against Trump to Republican opponents of Social Security in the Lincoln Project, Democrats need to stand up for popular social programs."

Anti-Trump protest in Manhattan. (photo: Scott Lynch/Gothamist)
Anti-Trump protest in Manhattan. (photo: Scott Lynch/Gothamist)


Donald Trump Is Undermining Social Security - Will Democrats Stop Him?

By Ari Rabin-Havt, Jacobin

09 September 20


Donald Trump’s plan to suspend the collection of the payroll tax risks both the financial well-being of workers and Social Security. Instead of outsourcing the case against Trump to Republican opponents of Social Security in the Lincoln Project, Democrats need to stand up for popular social programs.

onald Trump’s latest tax scam is his most dangerous yet. Based on an executive order, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will suspend collecting Social Security payroll tax from workers earning less than $4,000 every two weeks, or $104,000 per year. More than one million federal employees will automatically see this change in their September paychecks, while private sector employers will have the option to participate. These workers will see their take-home pay rise by 6.2 percent until the end of the year.

But like many of Donald Trump’s financial dealings, this is nothing more than a bait and switch for workers that will end up costing them even more down the road.

In May, I wrote that no one should be fooled by Donald Trump’s then-proposed payroll tax cut. It was simply a back door to slashing Social Security benefits down the road. His administration’s new policy is far more dangerous. It is not a back-door attack on Social Security, but instead a full-frontal assault on the financial well-being of working people and the programs they rely on.

The program Trump is implementing isn’t simply a tax holiday — he can’t do that without congressional approval. They are instead simply deferring collection of the tax that funds our Social Security system. In essence this is an involuntary loan that next year the IRS will begin collecting right out of people’s paychecks. Their take-home pay won’t just return to its original amount, it will shrink even further as the IRS claws back even more funds to cover the deferred payments from this year.

Next year, Congress or the new administration will be given a choice: continue this deferment or risk violating the shibboleth of not raising taxes on people earning less than $250,000 per year as their first act in office. (Biden has recently pledged not to raise taxes on anyone earning under $400,000.)

Fail to recoup this money and Social Security’s financial solvency will be put at risk almost immediately, leading to cuts in both disability funds and ultimately payments for the elderly.

Nancy Altman, who has been one of the foremost experts and chief advocates against Social Security cuts for decades explained,

According to estimates from the independent chief actuary of the Social Security Administration, if all Social Security contributions from payroll tax stopped on Jan. 1, 2021, the nearly 10 million people today getting Social Security Disability Insurance benefits, which averages about $1,125 every month, would see them stop abruptly in the middle of 2021. Those 55 million receiving Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance benefits, which average around $1,440 a month, would see them disappear two years later. Social Security would be without money to pay benefits by 2023.

Trump, in order to pretend he is giving workers a tax cut as Election Day approaches, has set an inescapable time bomb.

Option 1: See your take-home pay dramatically shrink just as 2021 begins. 

Choice 2: Cut Social Security, the only safety net many families have keeping the elderly and the disabled from living in poverty.

Trump’s decision to move down this path and the chaos it will inevitably develop in its wake does create an opportunity. His egomaniacal desire to be seen as delivering a tax cut to the middle class before Election Day means he has laid his hands on the third rail of American politics.

There is a reason that every politician who has touched it has not walked away unscathed.

This offers politicians who want to defend Social Security with a line of attack that is easily converted into thirty-second attack ads. Instead of outsourcing the case against Trump to Republican opponents of Social Security in the Lincoln Project, Democrats can now stand up for a popular social program. “Donald Trump is trying to destroy Social Security. We will protect it.”

It’s a simple appeal, but one that many establishment Democrats might choose to forego.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Labor Day 2020: The Power Shift Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=51635"><span class="small">Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog</span></a>   
Tuesday, 08 September 2020 13:15

Reich writes: "On Labor Day, just eight weeks before one of the most consequential elections in American history, it's useful to consider the economic reality that fueled Donald Trump's victory four years ago."

Robert Reich. (photo: Getty Images)
Robert Reich. (photo: Getty Images)


Labor Day 2020: The Power Shift

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

08 September 20

 

n Labor Day, just eight weeks before one of the most consequential elections in American history, it’s useful to consider the economic reality that fueled Donald Trump’s victory four years ago.

No other developed nation has nearly the inequalities of income and wealth found in the U.S., even though all have been exposed to the same forces of globalization and technological change. The three richest people in America have as much wealth as the bottom half of all Americans combined, even as 30 million Americans reported their households didn’t have enough food. 

American capitalism is off the rails.

The main reason is that large corporations, Wall Street banks and a relative handful of exceedingly rich individuals have gained enough political power to game the system.

Chief executives have done everything possible to prevent the wages of most workers rising in tandem with productivity gains, so most gains go instead into the pockets of top executives and major investors. 

They’ve outsourced abroad, installed labor-replacing technologies and switched to part-time and contract work. They’ve busted unions, whose membership shrank from 35% of the private-sector workforce 40 years ago to 6.2% today. They’ve defanged antitrust enforcement, allowing their monopolies free rein. 

The so-called free market has been taken over by crony capitalism, corporate bailouts and corporate welfare.

This massive power shift laid the groundwork for Trump. In 1964, almost two thirds of Americans believed government was run for the benefit of all the people. By 2013 almost 80% believed government was run by a few big interests. 

Much of the political establishment wants to attribute Trump’s rise solely to racism. Racism did play a part, to be sure, but racism’s sordid history in American politics long predates Trump.

What has given Trump’s racism – as well as his hateful xenophobia and misogyny – particular virulence has been his capacity to channel the intensifying anger of the white working class. It is hardly the first time a demagogue has used scapegoats to deflect public attention from the real causes of its distress.

Trump speaks the language of authoritarian populism but acts in the interests of America’s emerging oligarchy. His deal with the moneyed interests was simple: he’d stoke divisiveness so Americans wouldn’t see how the oligarchy has taken over the reins, twisted government to its benefit, and siphoned off the economic rewards.

He’d make Americans so angry at each other that they wouldn’t pay attention to CEOs getting exorbitant pay while slicing the pay of average workers, won’t notice the giant tax cut that went to big corporations and the wealthy, and won’t be outraged by a boardroom culture that tolerates financial conflicts of interest, insider trading and the outright bribery of public officials through unlimited campaign donations.

This way, the moneyed interests can rig the system while Trump complains that the system is rigged by a “deep state.”

Notwithstanding all this, Trump’s inexcusable failure to contain the coronavirus is having a larger impact on swing voters than the divisiveness he foments. Death has a way of concentrating the mind.

But if Joe Biden is elected, he would be well advised to remember the forces Trump exploited to gain power, and begin the task of remedying them. The solution is not found in mere redistribution of income. It is found in redistributing power. 

If wealth continues to concentrate at the top, no one will be able to contain the corrupting influence of big money on the American system and the anger it unleashes. As Justice Louis D Brandeis once said, “We can have democracy in this country or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.”

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The Trump Campaign Has Reportedly Squandered Most of the $1.1 Billion It Raised Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=50052"><span class="small">Caitlin O'Kane, CBS News</span></a>   
Tuesday, 08 September 2020 13:12

Porter writes: "President Donald Trump's reelection campaign has squandered its significant cash advantage over Joe Biden's rival presidential campaign, a New York Times investigation has found."

Brad Parscale. (photo: Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)
Brad Parscale. (photo: Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)


The Trump Campaign Has Reportedly Squandered Most of the $1.1 Billion It Raised

By Tom Porter, Business Insider

08 September 20

 

resident Donald Trump's reelection campaign has squandered its significant cash advantage over Joe Biden's rival presidential campaign, a New York Times investigation has found.

According to The Times, which spoke with dozens of current and former campaign aides and reviewed thousands of financial documents, the Trump campaign spent $800 million of its $1.1 billion war chest between the beginning of the year and July.

That's nearly three-quarters of its total funds spent with months of the campaign left. 

After he won the Democratic primaries at a significant financial disadvantage to Trump, Biden is winning back ground, with a record-breaking $365 million fundraising haul in August.

According to the report, Biden has held a series of highly lucrative Zoom fundraisers during lockdown, which Trump has eschewed, aides said, because he doesn't like them.

The report detailed a series of massive spends by the campaign, which seem to be more about pleasing the president than winning over supporters. They include:

  • $11 million on ads during the February 7 Super Bowl to match spending by billionaire Democratic presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg, who later dropped out of the race.
  • $1 million on TV ads in Washington, DC, which is solidly Democratic. (But Trump is known to watch hours of TV a day in the White House, venting on Twitter about negative coverage on news networks and advertisements by political opponents attacking him.)
  • $110,000 spent on magnet-lined pouches in which campaign officials meeting Trump can store their cellphones so their conversations with the president cannot be recorded. 
  • Lavish campaign headquarters in Virginia, where the campaign assembled a "large and well-paid staff."

According to the report, many of the spending decisions can be traced to Brad Parscale, who was demoted as the 2020 campaign chief after the president's June rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Parscale had billed the event as sold out, but the president spoke in a stadium that had rows of empty seats, with fears of the coronavirus likely depressing turnout. And a campaign by teenagers likely inflated expectations of how many people would show up.

Since campaign manager Bill Stepien replaced Parscale, he "has imposed a series of belt-tightening measures that have reshaped initiatives, including hiring practices, travel and the advertising budget," The Times reported.

While Parscale had a chauffeur-driven car while he was in the role, Stepien has taken a pay cut, according to The Times. 

In a break with precedent, Trump launched his reelection campaign the day after he moved into the White House and has held campaign rallies throughout his time in office.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Fourth World: Or American Carnage From a Pandemic President Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=6396"><span class="small">Tom Engelhardt, TomDispatch</span></a>   
Tuesday, 08 September 2020 13:05

Engelhardt writes: "The year was 1991 and the United States was suddenly the globe's lone superpower, its ultimate hyperpower, the last and greatest of its kind, the soon-to-be-indispensable nation. The only one left - alone, utterly alone and triumphant atop the world."

Supporters react as U.S. president Donald Trump holds a campaign rally in Minneapolis, Minnesota. (photo: Leah Millis/Reuters)
Supporters react as U.S. president Donald Trump holds a campaign rally in Minneapolis, Minnesota. (photo: Leah Millis/Reuters)


Fourth World: Or American Carnage From a Pandemic President

By Tom Engelhardt, TomDispatch

08 September 20


[Note for TomDispatch Readers: Well, I’m back for another fall, miraculously enough, my 18th doing TomDispatch. My thanks to all of you who offered this site a donation during my two weeks off. It does matter to me and to your fellow readers. It's truly how this site has kept going all these years. And although I know that I’m the proverbial broken record on the subject, if any of you have the sudden urge to offer TD a hand, please do check out our donation page. In Donald Trump’s America (see below), your contributions are the difference between my continuing as long as I can and the bottom of the deep blue sea. Tom]

-Tom Engelhardt, TomDispatch


Fourth World
Or American Carnage From a Pandemic President

he year was 1991 and the United States was suddenly the globe’s lone superpower, its ultimate hyperpower, the last and greatest of its kind, the soon-to-be-indispensable nation. The only one left -- alone, utterly alone and triumphant atop the world.

Who could have asked for more? Or better? It had been a Cold War fantasy of the first order -- until that other superpower, the Soviet Union, imploded. In fact, even that doesn’t catch the true shock of the moment, since Washington's leaders simply hadn’t imagined a world in which the Cold War could ever truly end.

Now, go ahead, blame me. In this pandemic moment that should perhaps be considered a sign of a burning, sickening future to come, I’m stoking your nostalgia for better times. Admittedly, even that past was, in truth, a fantasy of the first (or perhaps last) order. After all, in retrospect, that mighty, resplendent, lone superpower, victorious beyond the wildest dreams of its political elite, was already about to embark on its own path of decline. Enwreathed in triumph, it, too, would be heading for the exits, even if so much more slowly than the Soviet Union.

It’s clear enough now that, in 1991, with Ronald Reagan’s former vice president George H.W. Bush in the White House and his son, George W., waiting in the wings of history (while Iraqi autocrat and former U.S. ally Saddam Hussein was still perched in his palace in Baghdad, Iraq), the United States was already launching itself on the path to Donald Trump’s America. No, he didn’t know it. How could he? Who could have possibly imagined him as the president of the United States? He was still a tabloid phenomenon then (masquerading that year as his own publicist “John Miller” in phone interviews with reporters to laud the attractions and sexual conquests of one “Donald Trump”). He was also on the road to bankruptcy court since his five Atlantic City casinos would soon go down in flames. Him as a future candidate to head an America where life for so many would be in decline and its very greatness in need of being “made” great again... well, who coulda dreamt it? Not me, that’s for sure.

Welcome to American Carnage

Let me apologize one more time. Yes, I was playing on your sense of nostalgia in this besieged American moment of ours. Mission accomplished, I assume.

So much, I’m afraid, for such Auld Lang Syne moments, since that one took place in a previous century, even if, remarkably enough, that wasn’t actually so long ago. Only 29 years passed from that singular moment of triumph in Washington (a period that would then be fancied as “the end of history”) to Donald Trump’s America-not-First-but-Last world -- to, that is, genuine “American carnage” (and I’m not just thinking about the almost 190,000 Americans who have already died from Covid-19 with no end in sight). Less than a quarter of a century took us from the president who asked God to continue to “bless the United States of America” in the wake of a historic victory to the man who campaigned for president on the declinist slogan of making America great again.

And don’t think Donald Trump was wrong in that 2017 inaugural address of his. A certain level of American carnage (particularly in the form of staggering economic inequality, not to speak of the “forever wars” still being fought so brainlessly by a military on which this country was spending its money rather than on health, education, and infrastructure) had helped bring him to power and he knew it. He even promised to solve just such problems, including ending those forever wars, as he essentially did again in his recent White House acceptance speech, even as he promised to keep “rebuilding” that very military.

Here was the key passage from that long-gone inaugural address of his:

“Mothers and children trapped in poverty in our inner cities; rusted-out factories scattered like tombstones across the landscape of our nation; an education system, flush with cash, but which leaves our young and beautiful students deprived of knowledge; and the crime and gangs and drugs that have stolen too many lives and robbed our country of so much unrealized potential. This American carnage stops right here and stops right now.”

Of course, more than 3½ years later, in that seemingly eternal “now” of his, the carnage seemed eternal -- whether in the form of those wars he swore he would get us out of; the spending on the military and the rest of what’s still known as the national security state, which only increased; the economic inequality, which just grew, thanks in part to a humongous 2017 tax cut, a bonanza for the wealthiest Americans (and no one else), leaving the government and so the rest of us owing far more money than previously imaginable; and above all, the urge of his administration, from top to bottom, not just to deny that climate change exists but to burn this planet down by “unleashing” a program of “American energy dominance” and taking every imaginable restraint off the exploitation of fossil-fuels and opening up yet more areas for those industries to exploit. In other words, Donald J. Trump has given American carnage new meaning and, in his singular way, lent a remarkable hand to the transformation of this country.

A Simple Math Problem

When The Donald descended that Trump Tower escalator in June 2015 to declare himself a candidate for president, he made a promise to the disgruntled citizens of the American heartland. He would build what he hailed as a “great wall” (that the Mexican government would pay for) to seal us off from the lesser breeds on this planet (Mexican rapists!). Until that moment, of course, there had been just one “great” wall on planet Earth and it had been constructed by various Chinese dynasties over untold centuries to keep out nomadic invaders, the armed “caravans” of that moment.

As Americans would soon learn, however, being second best to or only as good as just about anything wasn’t, to put it mildly, Donald Trump’s signature style. So in that first speech of his, he instantly doubled the “greats” in his wall. He would create nothing less than a “great, great” one.

In the years that followed, it’s also become clear that neither spelling, nor pronouncing words is among his special skills or, put another way, that he’s a great, great misspeller and mispronouncer. Given that he managed to produce only 300 miles of wall on the U.S.-Mexico border in almost four years in office, almost all of it replacing already existing barriers (at the expense of the American taxpayer and a set of private donors-cum-suckers), we have to assume that the candidate of that first day either misspelled or mispronounced one word in that phrase of his.

Given what’s happened to this country since, it’s hard not to imagine that what he meant was not a great, great wall, but a great, great fall. And in this pandemic hell of a country, with its economy in the kind of tatters that no one has yet faintly come to grips with, its health (and mental health) in crisis mode, parts of it burnt to a crisp and others flooded and clobbered by intensifying storms, if that’s what he meant to say, his leadership of what remains the world’s lone superpower (despite a rising China) has indeed been a great, great success. For such a triumph, however, this country needs some new term, something to replace that old “indispensable nation” (and, for my money, “dispensable nation” doesn’t quite do the trick).

And I have a suggestion. Once upon a time when I was much, much younger, we spoke of three worlds on planet Earth. There was the first world (also known as “the free world”), which included the developed countries of North America, Europe, and Japan (and you could throw in South Korea and Australia, if you wanted); there was the second world, also known as the communist bloc, the Soviet Union and the People’s Republic of China; and, of course, there was the third world, which included all the other poor and underdeveloped countries, many former European colonies, scattered around the globe’s south and often in terrible shape.

So many years later, with the first billionaire in the Oval Office presiding over an era of American carnage at home rather than in distant lands like Vietnam, I suspect we need a new “world” to capture the nature and state of this country at this moment. So how about fourth world? After all, the U.S. remains the richest, most powerful nation on the planet (first world!), but is also afloat in a sea of autocratic, climate-changing, economic, military, and police carnage that should qualify it as distinctly third world as well.

So, it’s really just a simple math problem: What’s 1 plus 3? Four, of course, making this country once again a leader on this ever less equal planet of ours; the United States, that is, is the first official fourth-world country in history. U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A.!

Or if you prefer, you could simply think of us as potentially the most powerful, wealthiest failed state on the planet.

A Hell on Earth?

Humanity has so far (and I use that phrase advisedly) managed to create just two ways of destroying human life on this planet. In doing so, it has, of course, taken over tasks that it once left to the gods (Armageddon! Apocalypse!). On both counts, Donald Trump is proving himself a master of destruction.

The first way, of course, would be by nuclear weapons, so far, despite close calls, used only twice, 75 years ago. However, the president and his crew have focused with striking intensity on tearing up nuclear arms pacts signed with the Soviet Union in the final years of the Cold War, backing out of the Iranian nuclear deal, pumping up the “modernization” of the U.S. nuclear arsenal, and threatening other countries with the actual use of such weaponry. (Who could forget, for instance, The Donald’s threat to release “fire and fury like the world has never seen” on North Korea?)

In the process, the Trump administration has loosed what increasingly looks like a new global nuclear arms race, even as tensions grow, especially between China and the United States. In other words, while promising to end America’s “forever wars” (he didn’t), President Trump has actually pumped up the relatively dim possibility since the Cold War ended of using nuclear weapons, which obviously threatens a flash-bang end to human life as we know it.

And keep in mind that, when it comes to world-ending possibilities, that’s the lesser of his two apocalyptic efforts in these years.

While we’re still on the first of those ways of destroying this planet, however, let’s not forget to include not just the increased funding devoted to “modernizing” those nukes, but more generally the ever greater funding of the Pentagon and what’s still called “the national security state.” It hardly matters how little of that money goes to true national security in a twenty-first-century moment when we’re experiencing a pandemic that could be but the beginning of a new Black Plague-style era and the heating up of the atmosphere, oceans, and seas of this world in ways that are already making life increasingly unbearable via ever fiercer storms, ever more frequent wildfires, the ever greater melting of ice sheets, ever more violent flooding, ever greater drought -- I mean, you name it, and if it’s somewhere between deeply unpleasant and life (and property) endangering, it’s getting worse in the Trumpian moment.

In that second category when it comes to destroying human life as we’ve known it via the release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, the president and his men (and they are basically men) have shown a particular flair. I’m still alone in doing so, but I continue to refer to the whole lot of them as pyromaniacs, because their simple denial of the reality of global warming is the least of it. Trump and crew are clearly determined to burn, burn, burn.

And lest you think any of this will ever bother the president or his top officials, think again. After all, having had an essentially mask-less, cheek-by-jowl election rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, which spread the coronavirus and may have killed one of the president’s well-known supporters, he then doubled down in his acceptance speech for the presidential nomination. He gave it in front of the White House before the kind of crowd he glories in: 1,500 enthusiastic followers, almost all mask-less, untested for Covid-19, and jammed together cheering him for an hour. That should tell you all you need to know about his concern for the lives of others (even those who adore him) or anyone’s future other than his own.

Perhaps we need a new chant for this election season, something like: “Four more years and this planet will be a hell on earth!”

It was the worst of times, it was... no, wait, in Trumpian terms, it was the worstest of times since no one should ever be able to outdo him. And as CBS news anchor Walter Cronkite would have said in my youth, you (and I and the rest of humanity) were there. We truly were and are. For shame.

Tom Engelhardt is a co-founder of the American Empire Project and the author of a history of the Cold War, The End of Victory Culture. He runs TomDispatch and is a fellow of the Type Media Center. His sixth and latest book is A Nation Unmade by War.

Follow TomDispatch on Twitter and join us on Facebook. Check out the newest Dispatch Books, John Feffer’s new dystopian novel (the second in the Splinterlands series) Frostlands, Beverly Gologorsky's novel Every Body Has a Story, and Tom Engelhardt's A Nation Unmade by War, as well as Alfred McCoy's In the Shadows of the American Century: The Rise and Decline of U.S. Global Power and John Dower's The Violent American Century: War and Terror Since World War II.



e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Historical Report Calls for an EU-Romani Inclusion Law Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=56098"><span class="small">Marius Tudor, The Brussels Times</span></a>   
Tuesday, 08 September 2020 12:59

Tudor writes: "MEP Romeo Franz is a Sinto from Germany, the son of a Holocaust survivor. I am a Roma from Romania. We are Romani people and together we are a strong team, sharing a common purpose: to make a better world for our people."

Protest against persecution of the Romani. (photo: Brussel Times)
Protest against persecution of the Romani. (photo: Brussel Times)


Historical Report Calls for an EU-Romani Inclusion Law

By Marius Tudor, The Brussels Times

08 September 20


When many think that something is impossible, all can be possible if you believe.

EP Romeo Franz is a Sinto from Germany, the son of a Holocaust survivor. I am a Roma from Romania. We are Romani people and together we are a strong team, sharing a common purpose: to make a better world for our people.

Since November 2019, MEP Romeo Franz and I worked very hard to put together, in the LIBE Committee, a report that has the potential to change the lives of many. More than 12 million Romani people are living in Europe, around 6 million in the EU and 80% of them are living in extreme poverty. Moreover, antigypsyism denies them any chance to a decent life and the Covid-19 crisis has shown it, more than clear, as many people suffered in isolation, without access to food, water, or sanitation, and being beaten by the police.

They are our people and in every single day of our work, they play a major role, they are in the first place, as this is our goal: a better life for one of the most discriminated and oppressed ethnic groups in Europe, the Romani people.

With confidence, hope and perseverance, we have started to put together a report and a resolution that has at the forefront, for the first time in the history of the European Parliament, an EU legislative proposal for the Equality, Inclusion and Participation of Romani People.

We were not alone. We have tried to involve, especially, the ordinary Romani people, the affected people by racism, those from the grassroots level, the civil society, local Romani experts in the development of the report, as we planned something different than only some numbers on a piece of paper. We wanted to put the reality as it is on the table of EU decision-makers together with solutions coming directly from those who should benefit from a potential law.

A great team of shadow rapporteurs, advisers and experts from the European Parliament, as well as civil society organizations made a complete picture.

At the end of the day, a historical report was done. We have finally managed to make the voice of our people heard louder and more clear than ever at the EU level, as we are coming from inside the community, from the local level. We were born and raised inside Romani grassroots communities and we have never forgotten this or our people.

Thursday, the 3rd of September 2020, will remain a day of reference for Romani people. On this day history and justice was done for the largest ethnic minority in the European Union. The report was adopted by the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs with a consistent majority of 52 votes in favor.

This is a huge step towards an immense achievement for a significant improvement in the situation of the Romani communities. There is one more step left, the most important one. In the upcoming plenary session, the Members of the European Parliament will vote for the report. We are confident and we know that God will work again through people to change the lives of other people and we hope the report and its resolution will be adopted.

This will be the beginning of normality, after years and years of sufferance and deprivation as MEP Romeo Franz said during the plenary debate of July 9th, on Romani Inclusion:

“I am a Sinto, the son of a Holocaust survivor who lost six aunts and uncles during the Holocaust. I know how racism feels and I don’t want anyone to endure what me and my people are forced to endure on a daily basis. Please hold on for a moment and put your feet in our shoes and ask yourself how it feels facing racism, being degraded, insulted and beaten. We have not only Covid-19 in Europe, but a pandemic that is older and more dangerous: RACISM. Are we finally prepared to confront this reality and correct this injustice?”

Change can be possible when you believe. Change can be possible when you care for those around you. The report is clear proof and the credit goes to MEP Franz.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 Next > End >>

Page 363 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN