Paul Ryan Still Doesn't Get It

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

25 May 11

epublican House Budget chief Paul Ryan still doesn't get it. He blames Tuesday's upset victory of Democrat Kathy Hochul over Republican Jane Corwin to represent New York's 26th congressional district on Democratic scare tactics.

Hochul had focused like a laser on the Republican plan to turn Medicare into vouchers that would funnel the money to private health insurers. Republicans didn't exactly take it lying down. The National Republican Congressional Committee poured over $400,000 into the race, and Karl Rove's American Crossroads provided Corwin an additional $700,000 of support. But the money didn't work. Even in this traditionally Republican district - represented in the past by such GOP notables as Jack Kemp and William Miller, both of whom would become vice presidential candidates - Hochul's message hit home.

Ryan calls it "demagoguery," accusing Hochul and her fellow Democrats of trying to "scare seniors into thinking that their current benefits are being affected."

Scare tactics? Seniors have every right to be scared. His plan would eviscerate Medicare by privatizing it with vouchers that would fall further and further behind the rising cost of health insurance. And Ryan and the Republicans offer no means of slowing rising health-care costs. To the contrary, they want to repeal every cost-containment measure enacted in last year's health-reform legislation. The inevitable result: More and more seniors would be priced out of the market for health care.

The Ryan plan has put Republicans in a corner. Some, like Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown and, briefly, presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich, are rejecting the plan altogether. Most, though, are holding on and holding their breath. After all, House Republicans approved it - and voters don't especially like flip-floppers.

Senate Democrats will bring the Ryan plan for a vote Thursday in order to force Senate Republicans on the record. Watch closely.

Some GOP stalwarts say the Party must clarify its message - a sure sign of panic. Former Republican congressman Rick Lazio says the GOP "must do [a] better job explaining entitlements."

It's just possible the public knows exactly what entitlements are - and is getting a clear message about what Republicans are up to.

All this should give the White House and Democratic budget negotiators more confidence - and more bargaining leverage - to put tax cuts on the rich squarely on the table.

And, while they're at it, turn Medicare into a "Medicare-for-all" system that forces doctors and hospitals to shift from costly tests, drugs, and procedures having little effect, to healthy outcomes.

Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," "Supercapitalism" and his latest book, "AFTERSHOCK: The Next Economy and America's Future." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

Republican Party Now Hostage to the Cranks on Its Fringe

By Cynthia Tucker, Atlanta Journal-Constitution

22 May 11

or the crime of attempted compromise, Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Georgia, is being hounded by a furious Republican right wing that considers civil conversation with Democrats a suggestion of weakness, if not a sign of outright capitulation. Though Chambliss has spent years in service to conservative causes, his membership in the now-fracturing Gang of Six - a bipartisan group of senators who have attempted to hammer out a deal on the federal deficit - has subjected him to harsh criticism among ultraconservative purists.

For his work on deficit reduction and for other alleged heresies, Chambliss has earned the ire of Erick Erickson, a hyper-conservative Georgia blogger and talk-radio host who wants to defeat the senator in 2014. "Tea party activists in Georgia who want to make a big impact have two years to organize, mobilize, and lay the groundwork to get rid of Saxby Chambliss ... Now, why Saxby? ... Saxby has consistently stabbed conservatives in the back and it is time to take him out," Erickson wrote earlier this month.

Chambliss is not a man you'd mistake for a moderate. He opposes allowing gays to serve openly in the military, opposes reproductive rights and dutifully serves the National Rifle Association. Still, he has been openly rebuked for daring to enter discussions that might lead to a deal with Democrats. (Let me emphasize "might." Now that Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn, another conservative Republican, has dropped out of the Gang of Six, the odds of a deal have plummeted.)

This is what it has come to: A fundamental principle of democratic governance - negotiating with political opponents in good faith - has come under attack from an irrational ultraconservative base that demands its own way while claiming to champion the US Constitution. That base dismisses the democratic process if it produces a result they oppose. They denounce tyranny - unless it is in the service of their own ideals.

Let Rush Limbaugh say what he will, there is simply no similar force on the political left. Liberals have their fringe lunatics, of course. Recently, the usually respectable, if always ultra-liberal, Princeton professor Cornel West fired several crazed volleys at President Barack Obama - condescendingly dismissing him as a "centrist" and labeling him, more or less, an Uncle Tom.

But Obama gives his party's radical elements a subtle third-finger salute. He's a pragmatist dedicated to cutting the best deal he can get, even if it means setting aside a campaign pledge or two. And it's unlikely he will get so much as a primary challenge for it, given his broad appeal among Democrats.

The climate is a lot more hostile to the ideals of cooperation and compromise on the other side of the aisle. Not even the sainted Ronald Reagan would have come up to the take-no-prisoners, brook-no-compromise standards of tea partiers, Limbaugh, and the anti-tax radical Grover Norquist. Though conservatives try to airbrush these facts from history, they are, indeed, stubborn things: Reagan cut deals with Democrats to raise taxes - several times. During his presidency, business taxes were raised, the gas tax was increased, Social Security taxes were hiked.

Chambliss has refused to use the phrase "tax increase," referring, instead, to "revenue increases." Since taxes constitute, by far, the biggest source of revenue for the federal treasury, that means somebody's taxes will go up. For Norquist, that's a violation of conservative dogma.

The Republican Party is now held hostage to its fringe elements, a development that endangers us all. With a GOP-controlled House and a Senate barely in Democratic hands, Congress is whipsawed by the demands of an angry minority of tea partiers, paranoid conspiracy theorists, leftover John Birchers and anti-government cranks.

That's why House Speaker John Boehner has moved from reasonable to rigid in his statements on raising the debt ceiling: He is afraid of alienating the tea party forces in his caucus, who don't seem at all concerned about the prospect of pushing a fragile economy over the edge into the abyss. Wall Street's entreaties haven't brought them around.

(Reagan would have run afoul of GOP radicals here, too. In 1983, he sent a letter to Howard Baker, then Senate majority leader, urging the Senate to raise the debt ceiling and warning of "incalculable damage" if the US defaulted on its debts for the first time in its history.)

Eventually, I'd guess, the Republican Party will come to its senses, relegate its fringe to Siberia and return to a platform that embraces reason, logic and cooperation. Unfortunately, the nation's economy could be in ruins by then.