RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Can Bachmann Beat Obama? Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=7922"><span class="small">Niall Stanage, The Hill</span></a>   
Tuesday, 23 August 2011 18:44

The piece begins: "The only Republican presidential candidate to have won any significant contest so far cannot - at least according to the conventional wisdom - really become the partys nominee."

Republican presidential candidate Rep. Michele Bachmann encourages people to vote for her outside the Hilton Coliseum at Iowa State University in Ames, Iowa, 08/13/11. (photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Republican presidential candidate Rep. Michele Bachmann encourages people to vote for her outside the Hilton Coliseum at Iowa State University in Ames, Iowa, 08/13/11. (photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)



Can Bachmann Beat Obama?

By Niall Stanage, The Hill

23 August 11

 

he only Republican presidential candidate to have won any significant contest so far cannot - at least according to the conventional wisdom - really become the party's nominee.

Doubts that Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) can defeat President Obama or even win her party's nomination have persisted since before she entered the race, and they haven't diminished with Texas Gov. Rick Perry's (R) entering the race.

Perry, who can match Bachmann's ability to fire up the grassroots, undoubtedly has complicated the picture for Bachmann.

"I think they both appeal to the same portion of the Republican Party," said Andy Brehm, a Republican commentator in Minnesota. "I don't think there are many people trying to choose between [former Massachusetts Gov.] Mitt Romney [R] and Michele Bachmann."

Yet some observers think Bachmann, the winner of the Ames straw poll, is being dismissed a little too hastily.

"Is there a path to the nomination for her? Yes," pollster Scott Rasmussen told The Hill. "If Rick Perry does not catch fire and Mitt Romney is unable to command enough enthusiasm, Michele Bachmann is there, potentially, as an alternative."

A Gallup poll of registered voters released Monday showed Bachmann within striking distance, only 4 percentage points behind Obama in a head-to-head matchup.

But the poll also pointed to Bachmann's difficulties. Three GOP candidates - Romney, Perry and Rep. Ron Paul (Texas) - fared better than Bachmann in the survey.

Worse, Bachmann was the only one of the four GOP candidates to trail Obama among voters who identified themselves as independent.

"[For her to win,] she would have to perform well, and everything would have to break right for her," Rasmussen said. "But she has a clearer shot than some of the other candidates, like [former Utah Gov.] Jon Huntsman [R], for example."

The vexed question of electability, especially on a national scale, hangs over Bachmann. It remains an open question whether the general public can be won over by someone who has previously said it is "part of Satan" to use the word "gay" to describe homosexuality, and suggested that members of Congress should be investigated for possible anti-American views.

The Gallup survey will add ammunition to those who doubt Bachmann can win.

"Ultimately, Republicans' first priority is to nominate someone who can beat Barack Obama," Brehm said. "She is just not the most electable candidate. She has said some things that would cause a lot of concern to the independent voters we need."

Still, others question whether those Republicans who place electability above all else will carry the day over their more ideologically committed brethren.

"You'd think people have these long discussions about, ‘Is this person electable?'" said Wy Spano, a program director at the University of Minnesota Duluth. "But to more and more people on the Republican side, that doesn't seem to matter. They just seem to think: ‘We're going to go with what our heart tells us.'"

Of course, they could choose Perry, who formally entered the race the day of Bachmann's victory in Ames.

If electability is one challenge for Bachmann, another is her tendency to put her foot in her mouth, misstating everything from the location of key Revolutionary War battles to the date of Elvis Presley's birthday.

But the ridicule that once attended her - liberal critics frequently dismissed her as a Sarah Palin "clone" - seems to have fallen off lately, and some ideological opponents now offer grudging respect.

"She certainly isn't the favorite [to win the nomination]. But, in fairness, on the things that have been within her control - the debates, Ames, fundraising - she has done a good job," Democratic strategist Doug Thornell said.

Bachmann's recent victory in the straw poll was evidence of the strong grassroots approval she can engender and her ability to harness it, albeit on a very localized scale.

Critics point out that she may not get the momentum she hopes out of Iowa. In the last cycle, neither the winner of the 2007 Ames straw poll (Romney) nor the winner of the 2008 Iowa GOP caucuses (former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee) won the nomination.

But Bachmann has proven adept at tapping into the anti-incumbent, anti-government sentiment roiling the nation - despite the fact that she is, of course, in her third term in Congress. The stridency of her attacks upon President Obama is matched by a palpable disdain for Washington in general, both of which burnish her "outsider" credentials.

Those credentials were further polished during the debt-ceiling debate. While other Republicans seemed to try to simultaneously placate their most conservative supporters and acknowledge the risks of a U.S. default, Bachmann stuck with a starker position: She would not vote for any bill that would raise the debt ceiling, she said.

It was just the sort of approach guaranteed to give establishment Republicans heartburn - and to delight the Tea Party activists who are flexing their muscle within the GOP.

Bachmann "has really been a Tea Party leader," said Sal Russo, the California-based chief strategist of the Tea Party Express group. "She is not ‘the' Tea Party leader, because there isn't one. But she has been outspoken and out-front on Tea Party issues."

Bachmann's Tea Party appeal has helped her rack up impressive fundraising numbers, even before she commenced her presidential run. In the two years leading up to the 2010 midterm elections, she raised $13.5 million, an enormous sum for a congresswoman holding no leadership role.

In the second quarter of this year, she raised $4.2 million for her White House campaign, way behind Romney's $18.25 million, but more than enough to maintain her status as a viable candidate.

That, in itself, is evidence of the changing nature of the conservative movement, at least according to some observers.

When it came to winnowing the field, Spano said, "Republicans used to depend on the monied, business interests - who were quite conservative but didn't go quite so far as others - to sort things out in the end."

Spano, who said he makes "no bones" about his Democratic allegiances, added that "the whole idea that [the establishment] can bury a fringe-type candidate is losing its luster. Someone like Michele Bachmann can generate money and stay in the game a lot longer than we think."

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Obama Must Get Bold Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=7890"><span class="small">Jonathan Alter, Bloomberg</span></a>   
Monday, 22 August 2011 10:36

Jonathan Alter writes: "One good speech - or a hundred - will not solve the jobs crisis. But boldly confronting the Republicans with popular ideas that are hard to vote against will at least tell the country what Obama stands for, and it may even have the practical effect of putting some Americans back to work."

President Obama pauses while delivering a speech on the fiscal and budgetary deficit policy at George Washington University, 04/13/11. (photo: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)
President Obama pauses while delivering a speech on the fiscal and budgetary deficit policy at George Washington University, 04/13/11. (photo: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)



Obama Must Get Bold

By Jonathan Alter, Bloomberg

22 August 11

 

Obama must get bold, tell Republicans 'It's on.'

s he golfs and bikes on Martha's Vineyard, President Barack Obama will have plenty of time to think about how to get his presidency back on track.

Some aides are calling the major speech he plans to deliver after Labor Day a "reset" of his administration. That may understate its political importance.

Obama prides himself on being a clutch player. Although the election is still 15 months away, the speech is like a critical third-and-long in football. Victory doesn't depend on conversion, but it sure would help. If fall brings no better news than summer, the president could enter 2012 trailing Texas Governor Rick Perry, a guy who thinks Social Security is a "Ponzi scheme" and that the chairman of the Federal Reserve is a traitor.

Obama must work on two tracks - one idealistic, the other practical. The moment calls for him to offer a big vision for how to fix the economy, even if it doesn't have a prayer of passage. Then he should unveil smaller actions that could win congressional approval, plus a few imaginative executive orders that might let him move the needle on employment unilaterally.

The big revelation this week about the president's strategy is that he will be specific about where he thinks the new special congressional committee should find the additional $1.5 trillion in deficit reduction called for in the debt-ceiling deal. I'm told by the White House that contrary to House Speaker John Boehner's claims, Obama did send Boehner a short paper that detailed trillions in savings during their unsuccessful "grand bargain" negotiations in July, but it was never released publicly. This plan will be.

'Jobs First' Agenda

Most significantly, it will specify savings beyond the $1.5 trillion and use those extra billions for job creation. That would mean the president would "pay for" every dime of new stimulus. He won't label it stimulus, of course. Stimulus has been stigmatized. If he's smart he'll call it a Jobs First agenda, or something else that shows he's in touch with the average household.

At least the president is on task. After headlines about a pivot to jobs in December 2009, September 2010, January 2011, May 2011 and July 2011, he's finally shifting the conversation to what Americans truly care about.

That is, if no crisis intervenes. Obama's failure to drive home a jobs agenda is partly his fault (he thought until June that the economy was improving) and partly the consequence of the country's attention being drawn to other stories, such as the Gulf oil spill and the Arab Spring.

This week's bus tour across three Midwestern states seemed to refresh the president and improve his presentation. He began talking about "rebuilding America" instead of his old professorial references to an "infrastructure bank," which is a good idea but tone deaf politically considering that many voters don't really know what infrastructure means and despise banks.

Truman-Style Campaign

More important, Obama began sticking it to Congress, laying the groundwork for a 1948 Harry Truman-style campaign. Rebooting his presidency will require a bold plan that says to an obstructionist opposition: "It's on, guys!"

The conventional wisdom in Washington is that nothing will pass because Republicans are committed above all else to depriving the president of any victories. They've flip-flopped on everything from the creation of a debt commission to comprehensive immigration reform to extending the payroll-tax holiday (tax cuts, for crying out loud!) just to stick it to him.

But polls that show Tea Party Republicans are currently less popular than atheists or Muslims could change their political calculation. Swaggering Republican honchos may find that they need to be seen as getting a few things done, even if it means the president gets a little credit, too.

Big Ideas

The specifics of Obama's speech are secret, and many haven't been worked out. But I hear that it will contain more than simple pleas to Congress to pass the economic agenda the president began offering this summer, which includes extending the payroll-tax holiday, approving public-works spending, enacting a patent bill, ratifying trade deals and extending unemployment insurance.

Don't be surprised to see him also propose a major tax credit for hiring new workers, construction money for schools, an ambitious youth employment program (if he doesn't hold a high percentage of the youth vote, he loses the election) and a few of the other job-creation ideas he's been demanding his Cabinet and staff cook up. Some of these ideas can be implemented without Congress, like providing debt relief for strapped homeowners.

I'm hoping he'll also explore creative ideas like one offered by Cliff Sloan, a veteran of the Clinton White House. Under Sloan's plan, the president would sign an executive order requiring that all new (or renewed) contracts with the federal government contain a job-creation clause requiring that in exchange for the privilege of doing business with Uncle Sam, corporations (which have plenty of cash on hand) must agree to a net increase in payroll of at least one percent for the duration of the contract. With thousands of new contracts signed every week, this would have an immediate effect even if compliance was spotty.

One good speech - or a hundred - will not solve the jobs crisis. But boldly confronting the Republicans with popular ideas that are hard to vote against will at least tell the country what Obama stands for, and it may even have the practical effect of putting some Americans back to work.


Jonathan Alter, a Bloomberg View columnist, is the author of "The Promise: President Obama, Year One."

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Is the Media Treating Ron Paul Unfairly? Print
Wednesday, 17 August 2011 11:08

Joe Pompeo writes: "When asked if he has been unfairly ignored Paul responded: 'Sure. Yeah, they are and we need to ask them why,' he replied. 'I mean, what are they afraid of? We're doing well, we're certainly in the top tier, we did well in Iowa and we have a good organization, we can raise money. But they don't want to discuss my views because I think they're frightened by us challenging the status quo ... because my views are quite different than the other candidates', so they would just as soon us not get the coverage the others are getting and they will concentrate on establishment-type politicians.'"

Ron Paul was a very close second in the Iowa Straw Poll, yet his showing was largely discounted in media coverage. (photo: Charlie Neibergall/AP)
Ron Paul was a very close second in the Iowa Straw Poll, yet his showing was largely discounted in media coverage. (photo: Charlie Neibergall/AP)




Is the Media Treating Ron Paul Unfairly?

By Joe Pompeo, The Cutline/Y!News Blog

17 August 11

 

s Ron Paul the victim of a media blackout?

The Republican congressman and 2012 presidential candidate was shut out of the Sunday public affairs shows this past weekend despite his neck-and-neck second place finish to tea party favorite Michele Bachmann in Saturday's Ames, Iowa straw poll. He was likewise excluded from most of the second-day newspaper headlines about the preliminary political contest, leaving some news watchers to question whether Paul is receiving unfair treatment from the mainstream press.

"Ron Paul just got shafted," Politico's Roger Simon wrote on Monday. "Why didn't Paul get the same credit for his organizational abilities as Bachmann did for hers?"

"This pretending Ron Paul doesn't exist for some reason has been going on for weeks," said "Daily Show" host Jon Stewart in a segment Monday night that skewered coverage of the libertarian-leaning candidate. "How did Ron Paul become the thirteenth floor in a hotel? ... Even when the media does remember Ron Paul, it's only to reassure themselves that there's no need to remember Ron Paul."

Paul's spokesman, Jesse Benton, told the congressional newspaper The Hill Monday night: "It is a travesty that Dr. Paul was ignored after his near statistical tie and historic vote total. However, in our view, the networks could quickly and easily rectify this situation by having him on the coming week."

In an e-mail to The Cutline, Benton said the campaign had "seen an increase in media attention because so many American's have been outraged, and rightly so, by Dr. Paul's dismissive treatment. Citizens from across the country have been reaching out and demanding that the media cover Dr. Paul. And it is helping."

It's a bit early in the week for the networks to have lined up their guests for their Sunday shows. But Paul got some airtime on Fox News Tuesday afternoon, appearing on "America Live" with Megyn Kelly, and on CNN Monday night, sitting in with Piers Morgan. (He has appeared frequently on both Fox News and CNN since entering the race in May.)

As for MSNBC, "We have a standing request into the Paul campaign for the candidate or a surrogate," a spokesman for the network told The Cutline. "A surrogate was booked on Monday, but backed out. We were told that Paul was not available."

Betsy Fischer, executive producer of "Meet the Press," said in an interview with The Cutline that Paul declined an invitation to appear on the post-straw-poll edition of the show when it was extended to him three weeks before the event. Will another invitation be extended in the future? "We have no invitation pending, but we certainly wouldn't rule it out," Fischer said.

Likewise, "We look forward to having him on 'This Week' in the future," said Heather Riley, a spokeswoman for ABC News. A spokeswoman for CBS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Some commentators, meanwhile, are dubious about the notion that Ron Paul is somehow "getting screwed," as Salon's Steve Kornacki put it, by the news media.

"Those who believe Paul is getting a raw deal seem to assume that there should be a direct relationship between a candidate's straw poll performance and the level of media attention that candidate receives as a result," Kornacki writes. "The problem is that the straw poll isn't really about the literal order of finish. It means different things to different candidates for different reasons."

He continues: "The experience of 2008 demonstrated that it's very easy to exaggerate the breadth of Paul's support - and that his views (particularly on foreign policy) are so far outside the GOP mainstream that the party establishment will go to great lengths to make sure it doesn't expand beyond his base. That still seems to be the case today."

Eric Zorn of the Chicago Tribune agrees.

"In short, no, he will never be president of the United States and no, he is not a plausible contender for the GOP nomination, so those who are covering the campaign don't feel obliged to pretend otherwise," Zorn writes.

For Paul's part, he doesn't seem to be letting the lack of coverage slow him down. When asked by Politico's Simon about the "media blackout," Paul replied: "It did disturb me, but it was not a total surprise. The result at Ames was significant; it might well have propelled us to the top tier. The media cannot change that."

In this afternoon's Fox News appearance, Kelly asked Paul flat out if he feels as if the media is ignoring him.

"Sure. Yeah, they are and we need to ask them why," he replied. "I mean, what are they afraid of? We're doing well, we're certainly in the top tier, we did well in Iowa and we have a good organization, we can raise money. But they don't want to discuss my views because I think they're frightened by us challenging the status quo ... because my views are quite different than the other candidates', so they would just as soon us not get the coverage the others are getting and they will concentrate on establishment-type politicians."

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Holding Rumsfeld Accountable Print
Sunday, 14 August 2011 10:42

Intro: "In a courageous decision last week, a federal appellate court ruled that two Americans who say they were tortured by American military forces in Iraq in 2006 can sue former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and others for violating their constitutional rights."

Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. (photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. (photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)



Holding Rumsfeld Accountable

By The New York Times | Editorial

14 August 11

 

n a courageous decision last week, a federal appellate court ruled that two Americans who say they were tortured by American military forces in Iraq in 2006 can sue former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and others for violating their constitutional rights.

The case involves Donald Vance and Nathan Ertel, who went to Iraq to work for an American security firm and became whistleblowers when Mr. Vance grew suspicious that the company was involved in illegal activity, including weapons trafficking. They were detained by the military for three months and six weeks, respectively.

The opinion by Judge David Hamilton of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recounted their "well-pled allegations" that while in custody they were "physically threatened, abused, and assaulted by the anonymous US officials working as guards." The government eventually released them, without explanation or charging them with any crime.

The case is important because it makes clear - for the first time - that government officials can be held accountable for the intentional mistreatment of American citizens, even if that conduct happens in a war zone. (Sadly, there remains no accountability for the abuse, and torture, of foreigners by American jailers and interrogators, which Mr. Rumsfeld and President George W. Bush personally sanctioned.)

In allowing the suit to go forward, the court said the plaintiffs had alleged facts showing "that it is plausible, and not merely speculative, that Secretary Rumsfeld was personally responsible for creating the policies that caused the alleged unconstitutional torture," and that he "acted with deliberate indifference by not ensuring that the detainees were treated in a humane manner despite his knowledge of widespread detainee mistreatment."

The court rejected what it called the "unprecedented breadth" of the argument put forward by Mr. Rumsfeld and other defendants - that no government or military employee could ever be sued by American civilians for torture or even murder in a war zone. The court made plain that the wrongdoing alleged "violates the most basic terms of the constitutional compact between our government and the citizens of this country."

Judge Hamilton said further that granting Mr. Rumsfeld and others immunity from lawsuits "would amount to an extraordinary abdication of our government's checks and balances that preserve Americans' liberty."

The ruling relies on the landmark Bivens case, which allows citizens to sue officials for damages for violating their constitutional rights and is a powerful, though limited, remedy against government wrongdoing. This decision gives Mr. Vance and Mr. Ertel a chance to prove their case and vindicate their rights.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
A Wingnut & A Prayer Print
Saturday, 13 August 2011 18:33

Intro: "A little-known movement of radical Christians and self-proclaimed prophets wants to infiltrate government, and Rick Perry might be their man."

Rick Perry, who is running for President of the United States, is a self-proclaimed prophet. (art: Mario Zucca)
Rick Perry, who is running for President of the United States, is a self-proclaimed prophet. (art: Mario Zucca)



Rick Perry's Army of God

By Forrest Wilder, The Texas Observer

13 August 11

 

A little-known movement of radical Christians and self-proclaimed prophets wants to infiltrate government, and Rick Perry might be their man.

n September 28, 2009, at 1:40 p.m., God's messengers visited Rick Perry.

On this day, the Lord's messengers arrived in the form of two Texas pastors, Tom Schlueter of Arlington and Bob Long of San Marcos, who called on Perry in the governor's office inside the state Capitol. Schlueter and Long both oversee small congregations, but they are more than just pastors. They consider themselves modern-day apostles and prophets, blessed with the same gifts as Old Testament prophets or New Testament apostles.

The pastors told Perry of God's grand plan for Texas. A chain of powerful prophecies had proclaimed that Texas was "The Prophet State," anointed by God to lead the United States into revival and Godly government. And the governor would have a special role.

The day before the meeting, Schlueter had received a prophetic message from Chuck Pierce, an influential prophet from Denton, Texas. God had apparently commanded Schlueter - through Pierce - to "pray by lifting the hand of the one I show you that is in the place of civil rule."

Gov. Perry, it seemed.

Schlueter had prayed before his congregation: "Lord Jesus I bring to you today Gov. Perry.... I am just bringing you his hand and I pray Lord that he will grasp ahold of it. For if he does you will use him mightily."

And grasp ahold the governor did. At the end of their meeting, Perry asked the two pastors to pray over him. As the pastors would later recount, the Lord spoke prophetically as Schlueter laid his hands on Perry, their heads bowed before a painting of the Battle of the Alamo. Schlueter "declared over [Perry] that there was a leadership role beyond Texas and that Texas had a role beyond what people understand," Long later told his congregation.

So you have to wonder: Is Rick Perry God's man for president?

Schlueter, Long and other prayer warriors in a little-known but increasingly influential movement at the periphery of American Christianity seem to think so. The movement is called the New Apostolic Reformation. Believers fashion themselves modern-day prophets and apostles. They have taken Pentecostalism, with its emphasis on ecstatic worship and the supernatural, and given it an adrenaline shot.

The movement's top prophets and apostles believe they have a direct line to God. Through them, they say, He communicates specific instructions and warnings. When mankind fails to heed the prophecies, the results can be catastrophic: earthquakes in Japan, terrorist attacks in New York, and economic collapse. On the other hand, they believe their God-given decrees have ended mad cow disease in Germany and produced rain in drought-stricken Texas.

Their beliefs can tend toward the bizarre. Some consider Freemasonry a "demonic stronghold" tantamount to witchcraft. The Democratic Party, one prominent member believes, is controlled by Jezebel and three lesser demons. Some prophets even claim to have seen demons at public meetings. They've taken biblical literalism to an extreme. In Texas, they engage in elaborate ceremonies involving branding irons, plumb lines and stakes inscribed with biblical passages driven into the earth of every Texas county.

If they simply professed unusual beliefs, movement leaders wouldn't be remarkable. But what makes the New Apostolic Reformation movement so potent is its growing fascination with infiltrating politics and government. The new prophets and apostles believe Christians - certain Christians - are destined to not just take "dominion" over government, but stealthily climb to the commanding heights of what they term the "Seven Mountains" of society, including the media and the arts and entertainment world. They believe they're intended to lord over it all. As a first step, they're leading an "army of God" to commandeer civilian government.

In Rick Perry, they may have found their vessel. And the interest appears to be mutual.


n all the media attention surrounding Perry's flirtation with a run for the presidency, the governor's budding relationship with the leaders of the New Apostolic Reformation movement has largely escaped notice. But perhaps not for long. Perry has given self-proclaimed prophets and apostles leading roles in The Response, a much-publicized Christians-only prayer rally that Perry is organizing at Houston's Reliant Stadium on Aug. 6.

The Response has engendered widespread criticism of its deliberate blurring of church and state and for the involvement of the American Family Association, labeled a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law Center for its leadership's homophobic and anti-Muslim statements. But it's the involvement of New Apostolic leaders that's more telling about Perry's convictions and campaign strategy.

Eight members of The Response "leadership team" are affiliated with the New Apostolic Reformation movement. They're employed or associated with groups like TheCall or the International House of Prayer (IHOP), Kansas City-based organizations at the forefront of the movement. The long list of The Response's official endorsers - posted on the event's website - reads like a Who's Who of the apostolic-prophetic crowd, including movement founder C. Peter Wagner.

In a recent interview with the Observer, Schlueter explained that The Response is divinely inspired. "The government of our nation was basically founded on biblical principles," he says. "When you have a governmental leader call a time of fasting and prayer, I believe that there has been a significant shift in our understanding as far as who is ultimately in charge of our nation - which we believe God is."

Perry certainly knows how to speak the language of the new apostles. The genesis of The Response, Perry says, comes from the Book of Joel, an obscure slice of the Old Testament that's popular with the apostolic crowd.

"With the economy in trouble, communities in crisis and people adrift in a sea of moral relativism, we need God's help," Perry says in a video message on The Response website. "That's why I'm calling on Americans to pray and fast like Jesus did and as God called the Israelites to do in the Book of Joel."

The reference to Joel likely wasn't lost on Perry's target audience. Prominent movement leaders strike the same note. Lou Engle, who runs TheCall, told a Dallas-area Assemblies of God congregation in April that "His answer in times of crisis is Joel 2."

Mike Bickle, a jock-turned-pastor who runs the International House of Prayer in Kansas City, a sort of command headquarters and university for young End Times enthusiasts, taught a 12-part series on Joel last year.

The Book of Joel describes a crippling drought and economic crisis - sound familiar? - in the land of Judah. The calamities, in Joel's time and ours, are "sent by God to cause a wicked, oppressive, and rebellious nation to repent," Bickle told his students.

To secure God's blessing, Joel commands the people to gather in "sacred assembly" to pray, fast, and repent.

More ominously, Bickle teaches that Joel is an "instruction manual" for the imminent End Times. It is "essential to help equip people to be prepared for the unique dynamics occurring in the years leading up to Jesus' return," he has said.

The views espoused by Bickle, Engle and other movement leaders occupy the radical fringe of Christian fundamentalism. Their beliefs may seem bizarre even to many conservative evangelicals. Yet Perry has a knack for finding the forefront of conservative grassroots. Prayer warriors, apostles and prophets are filled with righteous energy and an increasing appetite for power in the secular political world. Their zeal and affiliation with charismatic independent churches, the fastest-growing subset of American Christianity, offers obvious benefits for Perry if he runs for president.

There are enormous political risks, too. Mainstream voters may be put off by the movement's extreme views or discomfited by talk of self-proclaimed prophets "infiltrating" government.

Catherine Frazier, a spokesperson for the governor's office, wouldn't respond to specific questions but wrote in an email, "The Response event is about coming together in prayer to seek wisdom and guidance from God to the challenges that confront our nation. That is where the governor's focus is, and he welcomes those that wish to join him in this common cause."

For the moment, Perry's relationship with the New Apostles is little known. Few in Texas GOP circles say they've ever heard of them. "I wish I could help you," said Steve Munisteri, the state Republican Party chair. "I've never even heard of that movement."

"For the most part I don't know them," said Cathie Adams, former head of the Texas Eagle Forum and a veteran conservative activist.

Nonetheless, Perry may be counting on apostles and prophets to help propel him to the White House. And they hope Perry will lead them out of the wilderness into the promised land.

Listen closely to Perry's recent public statements and you'll occasionally hear him uttering New Apostle code words. In June, Perry defended himself against Texas critics on Fox News, telling host Neil Cavuto that "a prophet is generally not loved in their hometown."

It seemed an odd comment. It's the rare politician who compares himself to a prophet, and many viewers likely passed it off as a flub. But to the members of a radical new Christian movement, the remark made perfect sense.


he phrase "New Apostolic Reformation" comes from the movement's intellectual godfather, C. Peter Wagner, who has called it, a bit vaingloriously, "the most radical change in the way of doing Christianity since the Protestant Reformation."

Boasting aside, Wagner is an important figure in evangelical circles. He helped formulate the "church growth" model, a blueprint for worship that helped spawn modern mega-churches and international missions. In the 1990s, he turned away from the humdrum business of "harvesting souls" in mega-churches and embarked on a more revolutionary project.

He began promoting the notion that God is raising up modern-day prophets and apostles vested with extraordinary authority to bring about social transformation and usher in the Kingdom of God.

In 2006, Wagner published Apostles Today: Biblical Government for Biblical Power, in which he declared a "Second Apostolic Age." The first age had occurred after Jesus' biblical resurrection, when his apostles traveled Christendom spreading the gospel. Commissioned by Jesus himself, the 12 apostles acted as His agents. The second apostolic age, Wagner announced, began "around the year 2001."

"Apostles," he wrote, "are the generals in the army of God."

One of the primary tasks of the new prophets and apostles is to hear God's will and then act on it. Sometimes this means changing the world supernaturally. Wagner tells of the time in October 2001 when, at a huge prayer conference in Germany, he "decreed that mad cow disease would come to an end in Europe and the UK." As it turned out, the last reported case of human mad cow disease had occurred the day before. "I am not implying that I have any inherent supernatural power," Wagner wrote. "I am implying that when apostles hear the word of God clearly and when they decree His will, history can change."

Claims of such powers are rife among Wagner's followers. Cindy Jacobs - a self-described "respected prophet" and Wagner protégée who runs a Dallas-area group called Generals International - claims to have predicted the recent earthquakes in Japan. "God had warned us that shaking was coming," she wrote in Charisma magazine, an organ for the movement. "This doesn't mean that it was His desire for it to happen, but more of the biblical fulfillment that He doesn't do anything without first warning through His servants."

There is, of course, a corollary to these predictive abilities: Horrible things happen when advice goes unheeded.

Last year Jacobs warned that if America didn't return to biblical values and support Israel, God would cause a "tumbling of the economy and dark days will come," according to Charisma. To drive the point home, Jacobs and other right-wing allies - including The Response organizers Lou Engle and California pastor Jim Garlow - organized a 40-day "Pray and Act" effort in the lead-up to the 2010 elections.

Unlike other radical religious groups, the New Apostles believe political activism is part of their divine mission. "Whereas their spiritual forefathers in the Pentecostal movement would have eschewed involvement in politics, the New Apostles believe they have a divine mandate to rescue a decaying American society," said Margaret Poloma, a practicing Pentecostal and professor of sociology at the University of Akron. "Their apostolic vision is to usher in the Kingdom of God."

"Where does God stop and they begin?" she asks. "I don't think they know the difference."

Poloma is one of the few academics who has closely studied the apostolic movement. It's largely escaped notice, in part, because it lacks the traditional structures of either politics or religion, says Rachel Tabachnick, a researcher who has covered the movement extensively for Talk2Action.org, a left-leaning site that covers the religious right.

"It's fairly recent and it just doesn't fit into people's pre-conceived notions," she says. "They can't get their head around something that isn't denominational."

The movement operates through a loose but interlocking array of churches, ministries, councils and seminaries - many of them in Texas. But mostly it holds together through the friendships and alliances of its prophets and apostles.

The Response itself seems patterned on TheCall, day-long worship and prayer rallies usually laced with anti-gay and anti-abortion messages. TheCall - also the name of a Kansas City-based organization - is led by Lou Engle, an apostle who looks a bit like Mr. Magoo and has the unnerving habit of rocking back and forth while shouting at his audience in a raspy voice. (Engle is also closely associated with the International House of Prayer - , Mike Bickle's 24/7 prayer center in Kansas City.) Engle frequently mobilizes his followers in the service of earthly causes, holding raucous prayer events in California to help pass Prop 8, the anti-gay marriage initiative, and making an appearance in Uganda last year to lend aid to those trying to pass a law that would have imposed the death penalty on homosexuals. But Engle's larger aim is Christian control of government.

"The church's vocation is to rule history with God," he has said. "We are called into the very image of the Trinity himself, that we are to be His friends and partners for world dominion."

"It sounds so fringe but yet it's not fringe," Tabachnick says. "They've been working with Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich, Michele Bachmann, Sam Brownback, and now Rick Perry. ... They are becoming much more politically noticeable."

Some of the fiercest critics of the New Apostolic Reformation come from within the Pentecostal and charismatic world. The Assemblies of God Church, the largest organized Pentecostal denomination, specifically repudiated self-proclaimed prophets and apostles in 2000, calling their creed a "deviant teaching" that could rapidly "become dictatorial, presumptuous, and carnal."

Assemblies authorities also rejected the notion that the church is supposed to assume dominion over earthly institutions, labeling it "unscriptural triumphalism."

The New Apostles talk about taking dominion over American society in pastoral terms. They refer to the "Seven Mountains" of society: family, religion, arts and entertainment, media, government, education, and business. These are the nerve centers of society that God (or his people) must control.

Asked about the meaning of the Seven Mountains, Schlueter says, "God's kingdom just can't be expressed on Sunday morning for two hours. God's kingdom has to be expressed in media and government and education. It's not like our goal is to have a Bible on every child's desk. That's not the goal. The goal is to hopefully have everyone acknowledge that God's in charge of us regardless."

But climbing those mountains sounds a little more specific on Sunday mornings. Schlueter has bragged to his congregation of meetings with Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, state Sen. Brian Birdwell, and the Arlington City Council. He recently told a church in Victoria that state Rep. Phil King, a conservative Republican from Weatherford, had allowed him to use King's office at the Capitol to make calls and organize.

"We're going to influence it," Schlueter told his congregation. "We're going to infiltrate it, not run from it. I know why God's doing what he's doing ... He's just simply saying, ‘Tom I've given you authority in a governmental authority, and I need you to infiltrate the governmental mountain. Just do it, it's no big deal.' I was talking with [a member of the congregation] the other day. She's going to start infiltrating. A very simple process. She's going to join the Republican Party, start going to all their meetings. Some [members] are already doing that."


oug Stringer, a relatively low-profile apostle, is one of the movement's more complex figures - and one of the few people associated with The Response who returned my calls. His assignment for The Response: mobilizing the faithful from around the nation. Though he's friendly with the governor and spoke at the state GOP convention, Stringer says he's a political independent, "morally conservative" but with a "heart for social justice."

Stringer runs Somebody Cares America, a nonprofit combining evangelism with charitable assistance to the indigent and victims of natural disasters. In 2009, Perry recognized Stringer in his State of the State address for his role in providing aid to Texans devastated by Hurricane Ike.

Stringer's message is that The Response will be apolitical, non-partisan, even ecumenical. The goal, he says, is to "pray for personal repentance and corporate repentance on behalf of the church, not against anybody else."

I ask him about his involvement with the Texas Apostolic Prayer Network, which is overseen by Schlueter. Six of the nine people listed as network "advisors" are involved in The Response, including Stringer, Cindy Jacobs and Waco pastor Ramiro Peña. The Texas group is part of a larger 50-state network of prophets, apostles and prayer intercessors called the Heartland Apostolic Network, which itself overlaps with the Reformation Prayer Network run by Jacobs. The Texas Apostolic Prayer Network is further subdivided into sixteen regions, each with its own director.

Some of these groups' beliefs and activities will be startling, even to many conservative evangelicals. For example, in 2010 Texas prayer warriors visited every Masonic lodge in the state attempting to cast out the demon Baal, whom they believe controls Freemasonry. At each site, the warriors read a decree - written in legalese - divorcing Baal from the "People of God" and recited a lengthy prayer referring to Freemasonry as "witchcraft."

Asked whether he shares these views, Stringer launches into a long treatise about secrecy during which he manages to lump together Mormonism, Freemasonry and college fraternities.

"I think there has been a lot of damage and polarization over decades because of the influence of some areas of Freemasonry that have been corrupted," he says. "In fact, if you look at the original founder of the Mormon Church, Joseph Smith, he had a huge influence by Masonry. Bottom-line, anything that is so secretive that has to be hidden in darkness ... is not biblical. The Bible says that everything needs to be brought to the light. That's why I would never be part of a fraternity, like on campus."


hy would Perry throw in with this crowd?

One possible answer is that he's an opportunistic politician running for president who's trying to get right, if not with Jesus, with a particular slice of the GOP base.

Perry himself may have the gift of foresight. He seems preternaturally capable of spotting The Next Big Thing and positioning himself as an authentic leader of grassroots movements before they overtake other politicians. Think of the prescient way he hitched his political future to the Tea Party. In 2009 Perry spoke at a Tax Day protest and infamously flirted with Texas secession. At the time it seemed crazy. In retrospect it seems brilliant.

Now, he's made common cause with increasingly influential fundamentalists from the bleeding fringe of American Christianity at a time when the political influence of mainstream evangelicals seems to be fading.

For decades evangelicals have been key to Republican presidential victories, but much has changed since George W. Bush named Jesus as his favorite philosopher at an Iowa debate during the 2000 presidential campaign. There is much turbulence among evangelicals. There's no undisputed leader, a Jerry Falwell or a Pat Robertson, to bring the "tribes" - to use Stringer's phrase - together. So you go where the momentum is. There is palpable excitement in the prayer movement and among the New Apostles that the nation is on the cusp of a major spiritual and political revival.

"On an exciting note, we are in the beginning stages of the Third Great Awakening," Jacobs told Trinity Church in Cedar Hill earlier this year. (Trinity's pastor, Jim Hennesy, is also an apostle and endorser of The Response. Trinity is probably best known for its annual Halloween "Hell House" that tries to scare teens into accepting Jesus.) "We are seeing revivals pop up all over the United States. ... Fires are breaking out all over the place. And we are going to see great things happening."

Moreover, various media outlets have documented a possible coalescing of religious-right leaders around Perry's candidacy. Time magazine reported on a June conference call among major evangelical leaders, including religious historian David Barton and San Antonio pastor John Hagee, in which they "agreed that Rick Perry would be their preferred candidate if he entered the race," according to the magazine.

Journalist Tabachnick says politicians are attracted to the apostolic movement because of the valuable organizational structure and databases the leadership has built.

"I believe it's because they've built such a tremendous communication network," she says, pointing to the 50-state prayer networks plugged into churches and ministries. "They found ways to work that didn't involve the institutional structures that many denominations have. They don't have big offices, headquarters. They work more like a political campaign."

But if the apostles present a broad organizing opportunity, the political risks for Perry are equally large.

In 2008 GOP nominee John McCain was forced to reject Hagee's endorsement after media scrutiny of the pastor's anti-Catholic comments. Similarly, Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign nearly fell apart when voters saw video of controversial sermons by the candidate's pastor, Jeremiah Wright. If anything, Perry is venturing even further into the spiritual wilderness. The faith of the New Apostles will be unfamiliar, strange, and scary to many Americans.

Consider Alice Patterson. She's in charge of mobilizing churches in Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas and Oklahoma for The Response. A field director for the Texas Christian Coalition in the 1990s, she's now a significant figure in apostolic circles and runs a San Antonio-based organization called Justice at the Gate.

Patterson, citing teachings by Cindy Jacobs, Chuck Pierce and Lou Engle, has written that the Democratic Party is controlled by "an invisible network of evil comprising an unholy structure" unleashed by the biblical figure Jezebel.

Patterson claims to have seen demons with her own eyes. In 2009, at a prophetic meeting in Houston, Patterson says she saw the figure of Jezebel and "saw Jezebel's skirt lifted to expose tiny Baal, Asherah, and a few other spirits. There they were - small, cowering, trembling little spirits that were only ankle high on Jezebel's skinny legs."

Those revelations are contained in Patterson's 2010 book Bridging the Racial and Political Divide: How Godly Politics Can Transform a Nation. Patterson's aim, as she makes clear in her book, is getting black and brown evangelicals to vote Republican and support conservative causes. A major emphasis among the New Apostles is racial reconciliation and recruitment of minorities and women. The apostolic prayer networks often perform elaborate ceremonies in which participants dress up in historical garb and repent for racial sins.

The formula - overcoming racism to achieve multiracial fundamentalism - has caught on in the apostolic movement. Some term the approach the "Rainbow Right," and in fact The Response has a high quotient of African-Americans, Latinos and Asian-Americans in leadership positions.

Lou Engle, for example, is making a big push to recruit black activists into the anti-abortion ranks. "We're looking for the new breed of black prophets to arise and forgive us our baggage," he said at Trinity Assemblies of God, "and then lead us out of victimization and into the healing of a nation, to stop the shedding of innocent blood."

Rick Perry is a white southern conservative male who may end up running against a black president. It doesn't take a prophet to see that he could use friends like these.

There's one other possible reason for Perry's flirtation with the apostles, and it has nothing to do with politics. He could be a true believer.

Perry has never been shy about proclaiming his faith. He was raised a Methodist and still occasionally attends Austin's genteel Tarrytown United Methodist Church. But according to an October 2010 story in the Austin American-Statesman, he now spends more Sundays at West Austin's Lake Hills Church, a non-denominational evangelical church that features a rock band and pop-culture references. The more effusive approach to religion clearly appealed to Perry. "They dunk," Perry told the American-Statesman. "Methodists sprinkle."

Still, attending an evangelical church is a long way from believing in modern-day apostles and demons in plain sight. Could Perry actually buy into this stuff?

He's certainly convinced the movement's leaders. "He's a very deep man of faith and I know that sometimes causes problems for people because they think he's making decisions based on his faith," Schlueter says. He pauses a beat. "Well, I hope so."

But the danger of associating with extremists is apparent even to Schlueter, the man who took God's message to Perry in September 2009. "It could be political suicide to do what he's doing," Schlueter says. "Man, this is the last thing he'd want to do if it were concerning a presidential bid. It could be very risky."




go to original article

A Wingnut & A Prayer

By Forrest Wilder, The Texas Observer

13 August 11

 

Perry's Prayer-A-Palooza seems like more of a mistake with each passing day.

With each passing day, Rick Perry's Christian prayer-and-repentance rally, The Response, seems like more of a mistake, a classic act of hubris by a politician still learning his way around the national stage. First, the backlash has been fierce, not just from the "usual suspects" like the ACLU and Americans for Separation of Church and State, but also a wide swath of American faith leaders as well as gay rights activists. Just today the Houston Chronicle reported that:

On Tuesday, more than 50 Houston-area religious and community leaders disseminated a signed statement drafted by the Anti-Defamation League expressing "deep concern" about a prayer rally "not open to all faiths," while the Houston GLBT Political Caucus and related organizations announced a Friday rally at Tranquility Park to protest the event. The groups that represent gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered individuals accused the American Family Association and other sponsors of the prayer event of hatred toward the GLBT community.

With competing events planned for Saturday, The Response is likely to be remembered as much for its sweaty supplicants as those calling Perry out for intolerance and religious bigotry.

The Response has proved so toxic that only one other governor may attend the rally, Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback and he's a 'maybe'. None of the right-wing governors elected in November - not Scott Walker of Wisconsin, John Kasich of Ohio nor Paul LePage of Maine - is attending, though the unpopular health-care-executive-turned-governor Rick Scott of Florida will apparently appear by video.

Then there's the potential problem of low turnout. The Chronicle reported today that only "several thousand people" have registered for The Response. Reliant Stadium can accommodate over 70,000. That's a lot of empty space for the news cameras to soak up, though I'm sure the planners will do their best to stage-manage.

The intensity of the objections to The Response combined with a projected lackluster turnout means Perry has a choice: either back away from his own event or take the risk of standing hand-in-hand with radicals from the periphery of American Christianity.

Perry has been playing coy about his role on Saturday. "I'm going to be there; I may be ushering, for all I know," Perry said last week.

Perry probably made a mistake enlisting the help of prayer warriors and self-described prophets and apostles who not only have 'out there' beliefs but are unaccustomed to the national media spotlight. Some of the leaders are interpreting the media coverage, including my article on the involvement of the New Apostolic Reformation movement, as a satanic attack.

On July 17, Apostle Tom Schlueter, the leader of the Texas Apostolic Prayer Network, told his Arlington congregation that: "He's [Satan is] going to go after us who are the army okay? Matter of fact that was interesting because the article that was written, it said Gov. Perry and his army of God and I thought, 'That's interesting, they got that right."

Today, Texas Monthly's Paul Burka argued that The Response "looks like an utter failure." Perry, Burka writes, made a stupid political miscalculation:

This is what happens when you think the rest of the country has the same civic and religious values as Texas.

This could have had a much different ending. Perry could have made the event nondenominational. He could have invited people and clergy of all faiths. But he elected to make it exclusionary–and not just exclusionary, but reflective of preachers who have expressed some of the most extreme religious views in Christiandom.

Of course this could prove to be a valuable learning experience for Perry. If it does prove to be an "utter failure," he may learn, before it's too late, to coddle his far-right allies in private rather than in the national spotlight.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 3391 3392 3393 3394 3395 3396 3397 3398 3399 3400 Next > End >>

Page 3400 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN