Jones writes: "Historically marginalized communities are likely to the feel the effects of a shutdown acutely as time goes on."
Why Race Matters in the Government Shutdown
By Imara Jones, Color Lines
02 October 13
he shutdown of the federal government which began at midnight today is a body blow to our economy that could prove difficult to bear. Coming on the heels of the automatic budget cuts of sequestration, which are already forecast to cost 750,000 jobs this year, and three years of an anemic economic recovery, the furlough of almost a million federal workers is just not what the economy needs right now. The shutdown was touched off by a Senate vote yesterday to turn down a measure that would have kept the government operating for 10 weeks in exchange for a one year delay in Obamacare.
Given that the federal government contributes one out of seven dollars to annual economic output by making critical investments in key areas such as health, education, food security and housing, it will be hard to find an American who won't be touched by this freeze in government activities, especially if it lasts for more than a few short days.
As the parts of the government affected by the shutdown disproportionately impact economic opportunity programs for the working poor, historically marginalized communities are likely to the feel the effects of a shutdown acutely as time goes on.
What's particularly distressing about the shuttering of the government is that it comes at a time when unemployment remains in the double digits for blacks and Latinos. As the Center for American Progress points out, federal, state and local governments since 2008 have eliminated 750,000 public sector jobs. Given unionization and strong anti-discriminatory hiring practices, people of color are more likely to have jobs in the public sector. This is particularly true for African-Americans, and it's why joblessness remains so stubborn in communities of color.
The truth is that people of color represent a larger proportion of the federal workforce than the workforce overall. According to the Washington Post, 35 percent of federal workers are non-White versus 30 percent of all workers. This means that a shutdown will only add to the economic woes and employment worries in communities of color.
To be clear, not all of the more than four million federal workers will be told to stay home. Men and women in the armed forces make up close to half of all those on the federal payroll. Given special legislation to exempt them from the shutdown passed by Congress yesterday, they will be on the job and receive pay.
But over 800,000 of the remaining two million civilian workers will be barred from work. Those deemed "essential" to maintain the "safety of human life or protection of property" in critical positions will work but not receive pay. Either way, the bottom line is that two million Americans and the families that rely on them will not receive a paycheck during the period of the shutdown.
The key question though is "how much of this will really hurt?" The answer depends on how long it goes on.
If the federal government is up and running by the end of next week, the impact will be minimal. But should it last for more than 10 days or so, it will begin to bite. Economic forecasts underscore the point.
As Bloomberg reports, Mark Zandi, former economic advisor to John McCain and chief economist at Moody's, calculates that a shutdown of a few days would be negligible, but one of two weeks would cut economic growth for the last three months of this year by 10 percent. Any longer than that and the economy would be on its way back to recession.
Adding to the potential pain and uncertainty of it all is the sheer scale of government activities that will be curtailed, each touching on vital areas of economic life necessary for the country to function. With guidance from agency submissions to the White House, here's a sampling of the way things could look if the shutdown persists into next week.
Health needs delayed: The 110 million Americans already in Medicare - the government health program for the elderly - and Medicaid - the federal and state partnership to provide health insurance to the working poor and their children - will continue to receive the services and treatment that they need. However new applications to these programs will be delayed until the government reopens.
Impaired ability to fight disease: The Centers for Disease Control will scale back the monitoring of the spread of infectious diseases and the National Institutes of Health will do the same for critical research into life-saving treatments until the lights come back on.
More people hungry: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly referred to as food stamps, will continue to provide its $33 of weekly assistance to the 48 million Americans who currently receive it. However, the Women Infants and Children Program (WIC) - which covers seven million children and infants, and their mothers - will temporarily end. The program will restart once the government reopens.
Poor kids set back: Funds for the one million children in Head Start will technically expire today, but only a smattering of locations will be forced to immediately close their doors. However, more programs will run out of money and come under pressure the longer this goes on. The same is true for Title I education grants, which provide badly needed assistance to 20 million children in the nation's poorest school districts. Also, review of new student loan and federal grant applications will be delayed.
Housing at risk: The Federal Housing Administration, which underwrites four out of every 10 mortgages in the United States and is crucial for working families entering the housing market, will not process new home loans during an extended shutdown. Housing vouchers for the working poor and the homeless will also be at risk the longer this goes on.
More immigration delays: Border patrols and enforcement will continue during the shutdown, but new visa and citizenship applications will be stalled until the government is back to work.
The essential point is that the partial closing of the government is potentially a huge setback for both the broader economy and economic justice at a crucial moment.
Though Congressional Republicans and their allied tea party organizations don't see it that way.
Former Republican vice chairman and head of the American Conservative Union, Al Cardenas, told the Center for American Progress' Thinkprogress blog this past weekend that he was "convinced" that there "would not be" any negative economic fallout from the shutdown. If the government is closed for a just a few days, he might very well be right.
But as I argued last week, the GOP and tea party outlook on a government shutdown is not about economic evidence, it's about advancing an overall ideology. Until that changes, millions of Americans might very well have reason to worry.
amous face-shooting war criminal Dick Cheney 
ongress passed the Affordable Care Act to solve a real, honest-to-God problem.
am reading and rereading the debates among some of the great radical thinkers of the 19th and 20th centuries about the mechanisms of social change. These debates were not academic. They were frantic searches for the triggers of revolt.
s a child I was bullied by bigger boys who threatened to beat me up if I didn't give them what they wanted. But every time I gave in to their demands their subsequent demands grew larger. First they wanted the change in my pocket. Next it was the dessert in my lunchbox. Then my new Davy Crockett cap. Then the softball and bat I got for my birthday.
