RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Herman Wallace Dies After Three Days of Freedom Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=21701"><span class="small">Kevin Gosztola, Firedoglake</span></a>   
Saturday, 05 October 2013 12:30

Gosztola writes: "The movement for human rights and justice mourns the loss of Herman Wallace, a former prisoner of the Louisiana State Penitentiary (Angola prison) who was held in solitary confinement for forty-one years before having his conviction and sentence for murder vacated by a judge this week."

Herman Wallace, left, and his legal team discuss his trip home to New Orleans after his release from Elayn Hunt Correctional Center in St. Gabriel, La., Oct. 1, 2013. (photo: Lauren McGaughy/The Times-Picayune/AP)
Herman Wallace, left, and his legal team discuss his trip home to New Orleans after his release from Elayn Hunt Correctional Center in St. Gabriel, La., Oct. 1, 2013. (photo: Lauren McGaughy/The Times-Picayune/AP)


Herman Wallace Dies After Three Days of Freedom

By Kevin Gosztola, Firedoglake

05 October 13

 

he movement for human rights and justice mourns the loss of Herman Wallace, a former prisoner of the Louisiana State Penitentiary (Angola prison) who was held in solitary confinement for forty-one years before having his conviction and sentence for murder vacated by a judge this week.

Wallace was released from prison because his Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection under the law had been violated when he was convicted by a jury that no women. The judge immediately moved to have Wallace released. Only after the district court judge threatened to hold the state in contempt of court if they did not obey him and let him go free did the prison allow him to be put into an ambulance that would take him to a hospital.

This conduct on the part of the state took place in spite of the fact that the man known as a member of the Angola 3 was dying from advanced liver cancer and would be dead very soon.

Yet, the callousness did not stop there. Two days after he was sent home to die amongst his friends and family, the terminally ill political prisoner and former Black Panther was re-indicted by a grand jury in Louisiana.

Wallace's legal team reacted, "If it is true, we are shocked that a state grand jury was asked to indict a man who has only days to live."

West Feliciana District Attorney Samuel D'Aquilla said, "I say he is a murderer, and he is not innocent," and, "The conviction was overturned because the federal judge perceived a flaw in the indictment-not his murder conviction."

D'Aquilla made it seem like the state was being compassionate by not moving to immediately have him jailed again and by planning to not schedule any dates in court until December. However, anyone familiar with Wallace's case will understand that the state was nothing but barbaric toward Wallace and that is because he tried to organize a Black Panther Party chapter in the prison in the 1970s.

Several details highlighted by NPR help prove Wallace did not murder the prison guard he was convicted of killing. Hezekiah Brown, a serial rapist who claimed to be the key witness to the murder, was apparently offered a pardon for his testimony. The deputy warden even recalled that "you could make him say anything you wanted him to say." There was a "single bloody fingerprint " found at the scene. It did not match Wallace, but the print was never tested by the state because it said it was not going to test the fingerprint.

Anne Butler, a forewoman of the grand jury that reindicted him in the 1990s, was the former wife of a warden in the Angola prison, Murray Henderson. She is known to have passed around a book to fellow jurors informing them that Woodfox and Wallace committed the murder. She even wondered why she was allowed to be a part of the jury and said to the district attorney at the time, "You are going to put me off this," and he said "no."

On top of that, Wallace was never given an opportunity to challenge his cruel confinement conditions. Every time officials "reviewed" his status in the prison, he was never given a chance to speak and would be handed a piece of paper indicating that nothing would change. And the reason for this was the fact that he had a past history of "Black Pantherism" and could not be allowed to be in the prison organizing younger inmates.

Angola 3 News, which has been advocating for justice for not just Wallace but also Albert Woodfox (who remains imprisoned for his involvement in the same murder despite the fact his conviction has been overturned), published a tribute to Wallace, who it described as the "Muhammad Ali of the criminal justice system."

This morning we lost without a doubt the biggest, bravest, and brashest personality in the political prisoner world. It is with great sadness that we write with the news of Herman Wallace's passing.
Herman never did anything half way. He embraced his many quests and adventures in life with a tenacious gusto and fearless determination that will absolutely never be rivaled. He was exceptionally loyal and loving to those he considered friends, and always went out of his way to stand up for those causes and individuals in need of a strong voice or fierce advocate, no matter the consequences.
Anyone lucky enough to have spent any time with Herman knows that his indomitable spirit will live on through his work and the example he left behind. May each of us aspire to be as dedicated to something as Herman was to life, and to justice.
Below is a short obituary/press statement for those who didn't know him well in case you wish to circulate something. Tributes from those who were closest to Herman and more information on how to help preserve his legacy by keeping his struggle alive will soon follow.

The fight is not over. Attention should be turned now to Albert Woodfox. He remains in solitary confinement and it was Wallace's hope that his case would help ensure that others like his good friend did not "continue to suffer such cruel and unusual confinement" even after he was gone.

Woodfox remains in solitary confinement and, according to Wallace's lawyer, George Kendall, is being subjected to further degrading treatment in the prison:

GEORGE KENDALL...[H]e has just recently again been subjected to anal searches every time he leaves his cell, whether it's just a walk down the tier to take a shower. Albert, 30 years ago, on his own, filed a lawsuit and won a lawsuit that prohibited the Department of Corrections from engaging in those kind of searches. And we called that to the attention of the Corrections Department when they started doing it again, and they said, "We're going to continue to do it." We filed yesterday in federal court in Baton Rouge a lawsuit seeking an injunction barring the Department of Corrections from using that kind of search on Mr. Woodfox and others in that cell block.
AMY GOODMAN: The judge who issued the order that he should not be strip-searched like this-anal cavity, oral cavity strip-searched-died.
GEORGE KENDALL: That's correct.

There is a lawsuit involving violations of the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment and violations of the Fourteenth Amendment that is set to go to trial in Baton Rouge in June next year. That will continue the effort to bring about some modicum of justice.

Amnesty International, which was a key advocate of justice for Wallace, explained in a post that he was "denied access to meaningful social interaction, work opportunities, education and rehabilitation programs." Also, "During his 41 years in solitary confinement he was only allowed out of his cell for seven hours a week, which he would spend showering or in solitary recreation. Under international law, these conditions amount to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment."

"Amnesty International knows of only one other person in the US who has been held for longer under such harsh conditions," the human rights organization added.

The organization has also pushed for Woodfox's release from solitary confinement. "In a case that has always been more about vengeance than justice, the state should immediately withdraw their appeal, and allow Albert Woodfox his freedom before it is too late," it declared.

The racial violence of the state of Louisiana is heinous. The complicity and indifference, which led him to remain in isolation for decades, is reprehensible, but let's not end on that note. Let's recall the spirit of Wallace as a fighter.

These words, published by Justice: Denied magazine in 1999, show the context in which he viewed his case.

On January 10, 1974, I was convicted of the 1972 murder of Brent Miller, a security guard who happened to be white. This was around the time of the "Prison Movement" around the country. There was "Death On the Yard," Folsom Prison; The San Quentin Six, from the murder of the revolutionary George Jackson; and, there was the infamous "Attica." Then, deep down in the swamp of Louisiana, we had the death of a white security guard at Angola Penitentiary, a prison dominated by black prisoners. All security guards and personnel were white. It is significant to mention race, because it played a role and continues to play a role in the frameup against me.
The times were sweeping the country with change, and that change was making its way to our swamp at Angola. After Guard Brent Miller's death, fear struck the hearts of all security guards who were guilty of having beaten, mangled, and even killed inmates who could not be controlled. The guards became so fearful that they refused to work unless they were allowed to carry weapons. The National Guard was called in to fill in for those who refused to work, but peace was still far from arriving...

Even more moving and powerful is this poem written by Herman Wallace called "A Defined Voice." (Listen to Herman Wallace read it here.)

They removed my whisper from general population To maximum security I gained a voice They removed my voice from maximum security To administrative segregation My voice gave hope They removed my voice from administrative segregation To solitary confinement My voice became vibration for unity They removed my voice from solitary confinement To the Supermax of Camp J And now they wish to destroy me The louder my voice the deeper they bury me I SAID, THE LOUDER MY VOICE THE DEEPER THEY BURY ME! Free all political prisoners, prisoners of war, prisoner of consciousness.

The quote he reads before the poem is from social philosopher and author of The Wretched of the Earth, Frantz Fanon: "If death is the realm of freedom, then through death I escape to freedom."

Today, Herman Wallace made his escape to freedom.

SEE ALSO: Watch a PBS documentary on Herman Wallace


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
End This Government Shutdown Print
Saturday, 05 October 2013 07:47

Obama writes: "The American people don't get to demand ransom in exchange for doing their job. Neither does Congress. They don't get to hold our democracy or our economy hostage over a settled law. They don't get to kick a child out of Head Start if I don't agree to take her parents' health insurance away. That's not how our democracy is supposed to work."

President Obama called on Congress to stop playing with peoples lives. (photo: White House)
President Obama called on Congress to stop playing with peoples lives. (photo: White House)


End This Government Shutdown

By President Barack Obama, Reader Supported News

05 October 13

 

ood morning. Earlier this week, the Republican House of Representatives chose to shut down a government they don't like over a health care law they don't like. And I've talked a lot about the real-world consequences of this shutdown in recent days - the services disrupted; the benefits delayed; the public servants kicked off the job without pay.

But today, I want to let the Americans dealing with those real-world consequences have their say. And these are just a few of the many heartbreaking letters I've gotten from them in the past couple weeks - including more than 30,000 over the past few days.

Kelly Mumper lives in rural Alabama. She works in early education, and has three children of her own in the Marines. Here's what she wrote to me on Wednesday.

"Our Head Start agency...was forced to stop providing services on October 1st for over 770 children, and 175 staff were furloughed. I am extremely concerned for the welfare of these children. There are parents who work and who attend school. Where are they leaving their children...is it a safe environment...are [they] getting the food that they receive at their Head Start program?"

On the day Julia Pruden's application to buy a home for her and her special needs children was approved by the USDA's rural development direct loan program, she wrote me from Minot, North Dakota.

"We put in an offer to purchase a home this weekend, and it was accepted...if funding does not go through, our chances of the American Dream [are] down the drain...We have worked really hard to get our credit to be acceptable to purchase a home...if it weren't for the direct lending program provided by the USDA, we would not qualify to buy the home we found."

These are just two of the many letters I've received from people who work hard; try to make ends meet; try to do right by their families. They're military or military spouses who've seen commissaries closed on their bases. They're veterans worried the services they've earned won't be there. They're business owners who've seen their contracts with the government put on hold, worried they'll have to let people go. I want them to know, I read the stories you share with me.

These are our fellow Americans. These are the people who sent us here to serve. And I know that Republicans in the House of Representatives are hearing the same kinds of stories, too.

As I made clear to them this week, there's only one way out of this reckless and damaging shutdown: pass a budget that funds our government, with no partisan strings attached. The Senate has already done this. And there are enough Republican and Democratic votes in the House of Representatives willing to do the same, and end this shutdown immediately. But the far right of the Republican Party won't let Speaker John Boehner give that bill a yes-or-no vote.

Take that vote. Stop this farce. End this shutdown now.

The American people don't get to demand ransom in exchange for doing their job. Neither does Congress. They don't get to hold our democracy or our economy hostage over a settled law. They don't get to kick a child out of Head Start if I don't agree to take her parents' health insurance away. That's not how our democracy is supposed to work.

That's why I won't pay a ransom in exchange for reopening the government. And I certainly won't pay a ransom in exchange for raising the debt ceiling. For as reckless as a government shutdown is, an economic shutdown that comes with default would be dramatically worse.

I'll always work with anyone of either party on ways to grow this economy, create new jobs, and get our fiscal house in order for the long haul. But not under the shadow of these threats to our economy.

Pass a budget. End this government shutdown.

Pay our bills. Prevent an economic shutdown.

These Americans and millions of others are counting on Congress to do the right thing. And I will do everything I can to make sure they do.

Thank you.



Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Hillary Clinton: It's Not Her Turn Print
Saturday, 05 October 2013 07:46

Kim writes: "I'm totally behind the idea of electing a woman president in 2016, and I also understand the wellspring of buyer's remorse that attaches to Obama's oft-dispiriting presidency. But anointing Clinton now isn't just anti-democratic; it paints a big sign on the party's door: No New Ideas Here."

Is Hillary Clinton too much of an insider to do what the next President needs to do? (photo: Getty Images)
Is Hillary Clinton too much of an insider to do what the next President needs to do? (photo: Getty Images)


Hillary Clinton: It's Not Her Turn

By Richard Kim, The Nation

05 October 13

 

ecause there are only 824 days to go before the 2016 Iowa caucus, it's time to start thinking about who should win the Democratic Party's nomination-Hillary or Not Hillary? Before you roll your eyes and turn the page, allow me to note that all the talk about the next, next national election isn't just the idle chatter of bored, twitchy journalists. The world may still be waiting for that white plume of smoke to rise above Chappaqua, but Clinton's supporters are not. They've already started a Ready for Hillary PAC, which has raised over a million dollars in its first six months and secured the services of two key former Obama campaigners, Jeremy Bird and Organizing for America director Mitch Stewart. EMILY's List has launched the Madam President project, which coyly pretends to agitate for a woman president, but which recently hosted town halls in Iowa and New Hampshire that became de facto Clinton rallies. "Go to the Ready for Hillary website!" urged former Michigan governor Jennifer Granholm in Manchester. And a slew of prominent women-from minority leader Nancy Pelosi to Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill to Vogue editor Anna Wintour-have pre-emptively pledged their allegiance to HRC. All of which produces the impression that Clinton's nomination is more than just a likely outcome; it's an inexorable ascension. As Donna Brazile put it, "If Hillary Clinton gets in the race, there will be a coronation of her."

Can we please hold the crown for at least another day? Or 824 of them? I'm totally behind the idea of electing a woman president in 2016, and I also understand the wellspring of buyer's remorse that attaches to Obama's oft-dispiriting presidency. But anointing Clinton now isn't just anti-democratic; it paints a big sign on the party's door: No New Ideas Here.

Here's how I see it: America has a lot of problems, the most acute of which is the yawning gap between the rich and everyone else. According to Berkeley economist Emmanuel Saez, the top 1 percent captured 95 percent of all income gains in the so-called recovery, while the bottom 99 percent barely gained at all. And the chances of anyone breaking into that uppermost echelon are dwindling. As a slew of recent studies have shown, America has less class mobility than it used to and less than Canada or Western Europe; an American child born in the lowest quintile has just a 6 percent chance of rising to the top quintile-42 percent will stay at the bottom.

Continue Reading: Hillary Clinton: It's Not Her Turn
e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The Triumph of the Ratfuckers Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=11104"><span class="small">Charles Pierce, Esquire</span></a>   
Friday, 04 October 2013 14:40

Pierce writes: "As the Reign Of The Morons enters its third day, let us pause for a moment to pay tribute to a political visionary whose entire career presaged the current moment."

Donald Segretti. (photo: AFP/Getty Images)
Donald Segretti. (photo: AFP/Getty Images)


The Triumph of the Ratfuckers

By Charles Pierce, Esquire

04 October 13

 

s the Reign Of The Morons enters its third day, let us pause for a moment to pay tribute to a political visionary whose entire career presaged the current moment, anticipating the essential dynamic in play in Washington right now in all of its petulant, kindergartenish glory. Let us raise a morning glass to Donald Segretti, the ratfucker.

(As any student of Watergate knows, "ratfucking" was the word used by Segretti and a number of other officials in the Nixon White House for the dirty tricks they ran in student elections when they all were at the University of Southern California. Segretti -- as well as his pal, Dwight Chapin -- simply transferred these techniques to our national elections.)

There are two basic philosophical foundation stones to ratfucking. The first is that political sabotage for its own sake is a worthy enough goal. There doesn't necessarily have to be an obvious purpose or obvious logic behind it. Everything is simply tactics. Those tactics either work or they don't. To believe this, of course, one must first believe that all politics is a essentially a zero-sum game of power; you win and the other guy loses. Who rules? Period. One cannot for a moment contemplate the notion that politics -- and therefore, government -- has anything to do with the public good. I trust I don't have to spell out the parallels between this elemental basis of ratfucking and what the Republicans are about in their current campaign of vandalism. This has now entered a time in which we are seeing sabotage for sabotage's own sake. Remember, the conservative rump faction has brought this shutdown upon the country because its members refuse to agree to a federal budget that contains lower discretionary spending than even Paul Ryan contemplated. That's because now -- as Congressman Marlin Stutzman pointed out clearly yesterday -- this isn't about the budget, or even about economics, it's about who wins and who loses. It's about whether or not John Boehner, the castrato Speaker Of The House, can keep his job. The public, as was said during our previous Gilded Age, be damned.

The second basic philosophical tenet of ratfucking is that it is essentially bullying. It is essentially about ridicule and deceit as ends in themselves. Segretti's activities were meant to bring embarrassment and public scorn upon his targets. They were not aimed at proving to voters that the opposition was wrong. They were aimed at making it look ridiculous. Hubert Humphrey's bastard child. Edmund Muskie's rallies cancelled. Sooner or later, of course, the viciousness and the schoolyard taunting can't be contained. Segretti's activities, while relatively harmless, opened the ballgame for the late Lee Atwater's vicious race-baiting and for the entire public career of Karl Rove, in which the latter has not drawn a single breath in which he did not dedicate himself to the degradation of the political process and the poisoning of the political debate.

We are seeing this aspect of ratfucking playing out now. We saw it when Representative Randy Neugebauer bullied a Park Ranger. We saw it when Rep Todd Rokita told CNN anchor Carol Costello, essentially, to sit there and look pretty while he unspooled whatever the line of the day was. We saw it when Rep. Darrell Issa flipped out at a reporter a few days before that. And we are seeing it in the cynicism of the the now-daily Republican gimmick of finding a government service that polls well and then pretending to care about funding it, as though the whole party hasn't been running against "government" since before Don Segretti was cheating the student body at USC. We will open the National Parks, and all the other good stuff, and we can do it without really paying for it. The last victory of pure Reaganomics is on display.

We are coming into the first weekend -- and therefore, the first Green Room festival -- since the Reign Of The Morons began, so I suspect we will see a lot of ratfucking gussied up as high rhetoric come Sunday. But, for the rest of us, we are living through a living history of sabotage, through a single extended dirty trick. We are all of us, milling around the public square, wondering who cancelled the rally today and somewhere, in a Days Inn near the airport, a clever young man snaps his suitcase shut and moves on to the next town. There is always another rat to fuck, after all.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The NSA Debate Is As Much About Journalism As Surveillance Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=7181"><span class="small">Glenn Greenwald, Guardian UK</span></a>   
Friday, 04 October 2013 14:29

Greenwald writes: "From the earliest stages of this reporting, back in Hong Kong, we expected (and hoped) that the reporting we were about to do would expose conflicts in how journalism is understood and practiced."

Glenn Greenwald. (photo: AP)
Glenn Greenwald. (photo: AP)


The NSA Debate Is As Much About Journalism As Surveillance

By Glenn Greenwald, Guardian UK

04 October 13

 

A 14-minute interview on BBC highlights the debate over the proper relationship between journalists and government

n late June, the economist Dean Baker astutely observed that our NSA reporting was "doing as much to expose corrupt journalism as to expose government spying." Indeed, from the earliest stages of this reporting, back in Hong Kong, we expected (and hoped) that the reporting we were about to do would expose conflicts in how journalism is understood and practiced as much as it would shine light on the NSA's specific surveillance programs.

That, I think, has clearly been the case. The debates over the proper relationship between journalists and governments have been as illuminating and significant as the debates over government spying and secrecy. Last night on BBC's Newsnight, I was interviewed for 14 minutes by host Kirsty Wark. It was an adversarial interview, which is how interviews should be. But she chose to focus almost entirely on the process questions surrounding the reporting rather than the substance of the revelations, and in the process made some quite dubious claims that come straight from the mouths of government officials. Nonetheless, her choice of focus ended up highlighting many of the most important conflicts about how journalism is understood, and is worth watching for that reason:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1Zvo8N3G94

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 3041 3042 3043 3044 3045 3046 3047 3048 3049 3050 Next > End >>

Page 3044 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN