RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
FOCUS | Will Dick Cheney Be Arrested for War Crimes in Canada? Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=27282"><span class="small">Jodie Gummow, AlterNet</span></a>   
Wednesday, 30 October 2013 12:25

Gummow writes: "The international group, Lawyers Against War, has urged Canadian authorities to arrest former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney for war crimes when he arrives at the Toronto Global Forum this week."

Former Vice President Dick Cheney speaks about national security in Washington, 05/21/09. (photo: Reuters)
Former Vice President Dick Cheney speaks about national security in Washington, 05/21/09. (photo: Reuters)


Will Dick Cheney Be Arrested for War Crimes in Canada?

By Jodie Gummow, AlterNet

30 October 13

 

he international group, Lawyers Against War, has urged Canadian authorities to arrest former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney for war crimes when he arrives at the Toronto Global Forum this week, Huffington Post reported.

The anti-war group wrote a letter to the Attorney General John Gerretsen and Police Chief Bill Blair saying it was their duty to arrest Cheney, "as a person suspected on reasonable grounds of authorizing, counseling, aiding, abetting and failing to prevent torture."

"Once Richard (Dick) Cheney enters Canada … Canada must ensure that Dick Cheney is either investigated and prosecuted for the indictable offence of torture in Canada or extradited to another country willing and able to do so," Lawyers Against the War's Gail Davidson wrote.

Cheney was a "big supporter" of waterboarding and other unlawful interrogation techniques during his vice presidency, in which thousands of people were tortured, kidnapped and assassinated based on his instruction.

Last year, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal convicted Cheney, as well as former U.S. President George W. Bush and six other Bush administration officials in absentia of war crimes including torture and cruelty.

Cheney's visit is likely to spark large protests. In September 2011, he was barricaded during large protests on a visit to Vancouver, where demonstrators blocked him from leaving an exclusive hotel for several hours before police were able to evacuate him. Subsequently, he cancelled a trip to Toronto in March 2010 citing safety concern, which led to large protests.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Our Invisible Revolution Print
Monday, 28 October 2013 13:32

Hedges writes: "Half the country lives in poverty. Many of the rest of us, if the corporate state is not overthrown, will join them. These truths are no longer hidden."

Hedges: 'The battle of ideas is percolating below the surface.' (photo: unknown)
Hedges: 'The battle of ideas is percolating below the surface.' (photo: unknown)


Our Invisible Revolution

By Chris Hedges, Truthdig

28 October 13

 

id you ever ask yourself how it happens that government and capitalism continue to exist in spite of all the evil and trouble they are causing in the world?" the anarchist Alexander Berkman wrote in his essay "The Idea Is the Thing." "If you did, then your answer must have been that it is because the people support those institutions, and that they support them because they believe in them."

Berkman was right. As long as most citizens believe in the ideas that justify global capitalism, the private and state institutions that serve our corporate masters are unassailable. When these ideas are shattered, the institutions that buttress the ruling class deflate and collapse. The battle of ideas is percolating below the surface. It is a battle the corporate state is steadily losing. An increasing number of Americans are getting it. They know that we have been stripped of political power. They recognize that we have been shorn of our most basic and cherished civil liberties, and live under the gaze of the most intrusive security and surveillance apparatus in human history. Half the country lives in poverty. Many of the rest of us, if the corporate state is not overthrown, will join them. These truths are no longer hidden.

It appears that political ferment is dormant in the United States. This is incorrect. The ideas that sustain the corporate state are swiftly losing their efficacy across the political spectrum. The ideas that are rising to take their place, however, are inchoate. The right has retreated into Christian fascism and a celebration of the gun culture. The left, knocked off balance by decades of fierce state repression in the name of anti-communism, is struggling to rebuild and define itself. Popular revulsion for the ruling elite, however, is nearly universal. It is a question of which ideas will capture the public's imagination.

READ MORE: Our Invisible Revolution


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Meet 3 Master Manipulators of America's Oligarchy Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=22800"><span class="small">Lynn Stuart Parramore, AlterNet</span></a>   
Monday, 28 October 2013 12:14

Parramore writes: "Ideas are costly, especially bogus ones. And a growing class of billionaires is more than willing to pay."

Enron billionaire John Arnold. (photo: AP)
Enron billionaire John Arnold. (photo: AP)


Meet 3 Master Manipulators of America's Oligarchy

By Lynn Stuart Parramore, AlterNet

28 October 13

 

Financiers Stanley Druckenmiller, Pete Peterson and John Arnold form a trifecta of treachery.

deas are costly, especially bogus ones. And a growing class of billionaires is more than willing to pay.

Whether they're ginning up deficit hysteria to cut Social Security or blaming teachers and firefighters for state budget crises, these 1 percenters pose as defenders of your interests while arranging things so that they can plunder America and leave hard-working people with scraps. They fully understand mechanisms of manipulating public opinion, and they can pay off pundits and politicians to subscribe to whatever ideas best justify their greed and abuse.

It's not enough that we now have the widest divide between rich and poor in living memory. These men are determined to crack open that gulf even wider.

We bring you profiles of three financiers who never made a useful thing in their lives, including one who helped bring you the Enron disaster. They are united in their efforts to blame ordinary people for Wall Street-driven economic woes and carve out another pound of your flesh for the rich. Money is no object in their quest.

Here's a look at how these three made their money, how they're conning the public, and what they don't want you to know.

1. Stanley Druckenmiller

His stash: $2.9 billion, made from hedge funds.

His con: Turn young people against seniors by scapegoating Social Security and Medicare.

Stanley Druckenmiller is the most insidious kind of capitalist charlatan-a rapacious wolf of an oligarch hiding in sheep's clothing. "I just want what's best for young people!" he cries. But his fangs are so long and sharp that only a fool could overlook them.

Druckenmiller, long a funder of right-wing causes and politicians, has lately been popping up on college campuses promoting economic nonsense in an effort to convince young people that greedy grandparents are to blame for America's weak economy. Yep, that's right. He sells the notion that instead of student debt, shitty jobs with few protections, and the hangover from a Wall Street-driven financial crisis, Social Security is what's hurting today's youth. Seriously.

Druckenmiller tarts himself up as a generational and class warrior who wants to save young people from their elders by slashing the social insurance programs that keep them out of poverty. Never mind that these young people will one day reach an age where they will need these programs even more than the current generation of retirees because they will likely have no pensions and will have saved into disastrous 401(k) plans-that is, when they can actually find jobs that have any kind of retirement plan at all.

Druckenmiller plays on the psychological tendencies of young people to get pissed off at older folks. He manipulates that habit in order to deflect blame from those who are actually hampering and destabilizing the economy, such as greedy financiers like himself. He cleverly tosses in enough populist-sounding tidbits, like raising taxes on capital gains, to pretend that he's really on the side of the regular folks.

Which is bullsh*t.

The truth is that we ought to be expanding the social safety net because we've got a retirement train wreck coming and a political system that's transferring wealth from working people to the rich. Taking money out of the pockets of seniors actually stalls economic growth by decreasing the demand for goods and services, as anyone who has taken Econ 101 is aware. Programs like Social Security actually save America money because they are inexpensive to run, and unlike private plans, don't gouge citizens with high fees. By the standards of advanced countries, our programs are pretty paltry to begin with, and cuts bring us closer to the Dickensian world that is no doubt what greed-blossoms like Druckenmiller dream about at night.

Despite the destructive stupidity of his ideas, Druckenmiller knows how to get the media to carry his poison. His nonsense was recently championed by Tom Friedman in the New York Times and James Freeman in the Wall Street Journal.

As Robert Kuttner has recently explained, it takes a lot of freaking nerve for an oligarch to argue that the "income distribution problem is somehow generational and that he, as a billionaire, has anything whatever in common with most college students or most recipients of Social Security."

Druckenmiller has that nerve, and then some. Where are the pitchforks?

2. Peter G. Peterson

His stash: $1.5 billion, made from private equity.

His con: Stoke deficit hysteria in order to shrink the government and let the wild horses of capitalism trample the masses.

Pete Peterson is the ultimate phony patriot. He has served as commerce secretary under President Richard Nixon, made billions on Wall Street buying companies in order to loot them, and has been tireless in his campaign to blame all of America's ills on a federal budget deficit - you know, the one that is actually declining. Through his Peter G. Peterson Foundation, this elder statesman of the oligarchy has spent about a billion dollars of his own stash to get us to buy the idea that America is broke, despite the fact that it is the richest country in the world. And guess who must open their wallet? You!

There is nothing Peterson will not buy to further his agenda: school curricula, think tanks across the political spectrum, seminars, TV ads, politicians-hell, he even bought his own newspaper, the Fiscal Times, where propagandists calling themselves reporters spread his deficit hysteria and promote Peterson's fondest wish, which is to kill Social Security and Medicare.

Though the public repeatedly rejects his nonsense, Peterson is able to pay influential politicians to sing his tune, including Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, who have been trotting out their discredited reports on the deficit ever since Obama appointed them to his fiscal commission in 2010.

Peterson is the oligarch behind the "Fix the Debt" campaign, a consortium of corporate honchos and wealthy individuals who have made it their mission to bring deficit scare-mongering to D.C. in order to achieve cuts to essential programs and secretly push through their main goal, which is lowering taxes on the wealthy.

Over and over, Peterson & Co. will try to gin up artificial crises so they can force Congress to do their bidding. Whenever you hear the phrase "grand bargain," somewhere out there a Peterson crony is smacking his chops. And the tasty treat is your pocketbook.

3. John Arnold

His stash: $2.8 billion, courtesy of Enron.

His con: Enrich Wall Street by blaming state budget crises on teachers, firefighters and other public workers.

If you were writing a movie script about unbridled capitalism, you could do no better than John Arnold as your villain.

Young, clean-cut and soft-spoken, Arnold looks like he just wants what's best for America. But that would be his America, not yours.

For starters, Arnold made his fortune at Enron, where he worked with a gang of criminal fraudsters to wreck, among other things, California's economy. Now he is actually using a front group to loot California's pension system.

The 39-year-old Arnold left his work as an energy trader in 2012 to style himself as a new breed of philanthropist who will change the course of history-in favor of the 1 percent.

As David Sirota and Matt Taibbi have explained, Arnold's game is promoting a "pension reform" movement designed to channel billions of dollars in public pensions to hedge funds and Wall Street players who can charge exorbitant fees while mismanaging public money and hiding their shenanigans from the citizenry.

Arnold disguises his agenda by doing things like donating to the federal Head Start program-purportedly to help it through the government shutdown.

But don't be fooled. He's been very busy behind the scenes with other activities. He joined forces with Pew Charitable Trusts to create a campaign to cut pensions and he has tirelessly spewed impressive-sounding actuarial nonsense at elected officials and members of the media to get governments to transfer wealth from public workers to Wall Street. Gina Raimondo, the Rhode Island state treasurer, is an Arnold-acolyte and has allowed the state's pensions to fall victim to a Wall Street coup that will let financiers to fatten their wallets at the expense of people whose only crime was to get up in the morning and go to work serving their communities.

The reasons state and municipal budgets are having troubles has little to do with the fact that teachers and other workers will end up with pensions that average around $25,000 a year (and many of them won't get Social Security). They are hurting because Wall Street has been ripping them off for decades, and then socked them with a horrific financial crisis which killed revenue streams. That plus the plague of unscrupulous politicians who have been shoveling money meant for pensions into their pet projects is why states are suffering and pensions are dealing with shortfalls - though usually not the hysterical crises Arnold and his cohorts would have you believe. Robbing teachers and firefighters will not solve these problems. Reining in financial criminals and crooked politicians will.

Enron's collapse already wiped out 401(k) plans and gutted pension benefits that many workers counted on for retirement. But somehow that blow to society did not satisfy Arnold. He'd like to bring more retirement disasters to a neighborhood near you.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS | This Is Not America Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=11104"><span class="small">Charles Pierce, Esquire</span></a>   
Monday, 28 October 2013 11:00

Pierce writes: "The administration apparently has decided to make a fight over another one of the policies that grew out of the Avignon Presidency's extended period of pissing down its own leg in abject terror."

The U.S. Department of Justice. (photo: Wikimedia)
The U.S. Department of Justice. (photo: Wikimedia)


This Is Not America

By Charles Pierce, Esquire

28 October 13

 

he invaluable Charlie Savage had the best story of the weekend. Which, of course, drew no notice because of Glitch-ghazi-gate. The administration apparently has decided to make a fight over another one of the policies that grew out of the Avignon Presidency's extended period of pissing down its own leg in abject terror.

The government's notice allows Mr. Muhtorov's lawyer to ask a court to suppress the evidence by arguing that it derived from unconstitutional surveillance, setting in motion judicial review of the eavesdropping. The New York Times reported on Oct. 17 that the decision by prosecutors to notify a defendant about the wiretapping followed a legal policy debate inside the Justice Department. The debate began in June when Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr. discovered that the department's National Security Division did not notify criminal defendants when eavesdropping without a warrant was an early link in an investigative chain that led to evidence used in court. As a result, none of the defendants knew that they had the right to challenge the warrantless wiretapping law.

There seems to have been an...ahem...breakdown in communications in the DOJ.

The practice contradicted what Mr. Verrilli had told the Supreme Court last year in a case challenging the law, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008. Legalizing a form of the Bush administration's program of warrantless surveillance, the law authorized the government to wiretap Americans' e-mails and phone calls without an individual court order and on domestic soil so long as the surveillance is "targeted" at a foreigner abroad.

Uh-oh.

A group of plaintiffs led by Amnesty International had challenged the law as unconstitutional. But Mr. Verrilli last year urged the Supreme Court to dismiss the case because those plaintiffs could not prove that they had been wiretapped. In making that argument, he said a defendant who faced evidence derived from the law would have proper legal standing and would be notified, so dismissing the lawsuit by Amnesty International would not close the door to judicial review of the 2008 law. The court accepted that logic, voting 5-to-4 to dismiss the case.

This is what happens when you overturn 700 years of western jurisprudence and hand the whole thing over the the likes of John Yoo. Sooner or later, somebody else has to square things up, and that person finds an entire rat's nest of what can only be called intellectual corruption.

The Justice Department change traces back to June, when The Times reported that prosecutors in Fort Lauderdale and Chicago had told plaintiffs they did not need to say whether evidence in their cases derived from warrantless wiretapping, in conflict with what the Justice Department had told the Supreme Court. After reading the article, Mr. Verrilli sought an explanation from the National Security Division, whose lawyers had vetted his briefs and helped him practice for his arguments, according to officials with knowledge of the internal deliberations. It was only then that he learned of the division's practice of narrowly interpreting its need to notify defendants of evidence "derived from" warrantless wiretapping.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
A Lawsuit to End Homosexuality Print
Monday, 28 October 2013 08:43

Dickson writes: "At a Tea Party Unity gathering on Thursday, Scarborough chatted with Americans for Truth About Homosexuality President Peter LaBarbera about his grand scheme for taking on the homosexuality lobby."

Dickinson: 'Tea Party Leader [Rick Scarborough] Wants to Sue Homosexuality, All of It.' (photo: CBS News)
Dickinson: 'Tea Party Leader [Rick Scarborough] Wants to Sue Homosexuality, All of It.' (photo: CBS News)


A Lawsuit to End Homosexuality

By Caitlin Dickson, The Daily Beast

28 October 13

 

Homosexuality is just as dangerous as cigarettes, so why not try to end it—with a tobacco company-style lawsuit? Meanwhile, it’s about time for an insurrection against Obama, plus more from the fringe this week.

nough attempting to suppress homosexuality by banning gay marriage from state to state. Tea Party leader Rick Scarborough is focused on the bigger picture. At a Tea Party Unity gathering on Thursday, Scarborough chatted with Americans for Truth About Homosexuality President Peter LaBarbera about his grand scheme for taking on the homosexuality lobby with a class action lawsuit like the one pursued against the major tobacco companies. "The whole issue of a class action lawsuit, you and I have talked about this a little bit," Scarborough said. "Obviously, statistically now even the Centers for Disease Control verifies homosexuality more likely to lead to AIDS than smoking leads to cancer. And yet the entire nation has rejected smoking, billions of dollars are put into a trust fund to help cancer victims and the tobacco industry was held accountable for that." His argument doesn't really stand up to the facts, as The Huffington Post points out: the CDC reported in 2008 that "more deaths are caused each year by tobacco use than by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) illegal drug use, alcohol use, motor vehicle injuries, suicides, and murders combined." But who can keep track? At least LaBarbera agreed with Scarborough's suggestion and said he'd "love to see" a class action lawsuit against...gays? "We always wanted to see one of the kid in high school who was counseled by the official school counselor to just be gay, then he comes down with HIV," said LaBarbera, because one thing inevitably leads to the other. "But we never really got the client for that." And another thing! LaBarbera would like to see more stories about "ex-gays" on Fox News. "We need to work on our conservative, alternate media and say, 'Look, don't do the pro-gay thing, why don't you rather step out and support these 'ex-gays'? We should encourage Fox News to tell their stories," he said.

North Carolina GOP Leader: Law That Hurts 'Lazy Blacks' Is Not Racist

Don Yelton now the former precinct chair of the Buncombe County, North Carolina, Republican Party, took to The Daily Show on Thursday, to defend his state's recently enacted bill that requires voter identification as well as other modes of voter suppression. The controversial law, he insisted, is not racist and neither is he, despite using the "n" word throughout the interview, because, you know, "one of my best friends is black." If the law just happens to "hurt a bunch of college kids that's too lazy to get up off their 'bahunkus' and get a photo ID, so be it," he said. "If it hurts a bunch of lazy blacks that want the government to give them everything, so be it." Yelton was promptly asked to resign from his GOP precinct chairmanship after the interview.

Conservative Commentator Calls for Insurrection Against Obama

WorldNetDaily writer and Fox News regular Erik Rush declares that now is the time for "civil disobedience" and an "insurrection" against President Obama, as the government has become overrun by a "horde of soulless monsters" and "lifelong students of old-school communism." It's only a matter of time before Obama and his government will "start kicking down doors and herding people into cattle cars," Rush warns, adding that he fears when that happens, "those who still insist upon defending Obama and his ilk, whether liberal commentators or our neighbors, are those who will merely shrug their shoulders." After all, Rush writes, most Americans still have no idea that "President Obama is a Marxist and Islamist sympathizer who was maneuvered into the presidency by well-heeled socialists and Saudi Islamists," determined to place "members of the Muslim Brotherhood-an organization with a written mission to destroy America-into high places in government."

Virginia: Push to Ban Sodomy May Make Life Easier for Real Sex Offenders

There's no dispute over whether Virginia gubernatorial hopeful Ken Cuccinelli's relentless attempt to revive his state's unconstitutional anti-sodomy law is homophobic. But in his bid to ban sodomy between anyone, including consenting adults, he may be letting the people he claims to be targeting, "predatory adults," off the hook. In his current role as attorney general, Cuccinelli has led the fight against updating Virginia's Crimes Against Humanity Law to eliminate provisions banning consensual oral and anal sex between adults-leaving Virginia with an unconstitutional law it can't enforce in cases where it's really needed. For example, a 47-year-old man named William McDonald was convicted in 2005 of demanding oral sex from a 17-year-old girl under Virginia's Crimes Against Humanity law and, because the Supreme Court had deemed all anti-sodomy laws unconstitutional, was able to successfully challenge his conviction. A spokesman for the attorney general's office said that the appeals court's call in this case could make close to 90 people eligible for having their names removed from the state sex offender registry.

Major GOP Donor: Nuke Iran Before It Can Get Nuclear Weapons

Sheldon Adelson is not a politician. He is, however, a ridiculously wealthy casino mogul who contributes millions of dollars to the campaigns Republican politicians and think tanks, so his fringe theories should be taken at least somewhat seriously. Speaking at a panel called "Will Jews Exist? Iran, Assimilation and the Threat to Israel and Jewish Survival," at New York's Yeshiva University, Adelson urged that rather than attempt to talk Iran out of pursuing nuclear weapons development, the U.S. should bomb Iran into compliance, with a nuke, no less. In a video recording of the speech, Adelson is heard arguing that an atomic weapon should be sent to the middle of the desert where it won't hurt anyone, except "maybe a couple of rattlesnakes and scorpions or whatever." After that macho display of force, Adelson said, Americans will have the guts to say: "See! The next one is in the middle of Tehran. So, we mean business. You want to be wiped out? Go ahead and take a tough position and continue with your nuclear development."


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 3021 3022 3023 3024 3025 3026 3027 3028 3029 3030 Next > End >>

Page 3026 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN