RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
State of the Union: Right on Wages, Wrong on Trade Print
Wednesday, 29 January 2014 09:13

Nichols writes: "He didn't quite get there Tuesday night. And it will make it harder to achieve the 'year of action' that the president is right to say that America desperately needs."

President Obama delivers the State of the Union address yesterday. (photo: Getty Images)
President Obama delivers the State of the Union address yesterday. (photo: Getty Images)


State of the Union: Right on Wages, Wrong on Trade

By John Nichols, The Nation

29 January 14

 

resident Obama wants 2014 to be a "year of action" in which the country finally begins to address a wealth gap that has made the term "income inequality" the catchphrase of the moment. And he framed the crisis well in his fifth State of the Union address:

Today, after four years of economic growth, corporate profits and stock prices have rarely been higher, and those at the top have never done better. But average wages have barely budged. Inequality has deepened. Upward mobility has stalled. The cold, hard fact is that even in the midst of recovery, too many Americans are working more than ever just to get by-let alone get ahead. And too many still aren't working at all.

But Tuesday night was not the first time that he explained the problem in the right way.

He did precisely that six years ago-speaking specifically about inequality and declaring that government had an ability and a responsibility to address it aggressively and unapologetically.

Obama's ability to identify the crisis, and his willingness to speak in blunter terms than his political opponents about its repercussions, got him elected president. By a landslide.

Now, after a year of wrangling with an uncooperative Congress and at the start of a critical mid-term election year, Obama is trying to renew the political calculus that convinced Americans that he was right leader for the country-and that it was right to provide him with the solid Democratic majorities in the House and Senate that would allow him to turn rhetoric into action.

As he prepared what could well be the most important State of the Union address of his presidency, most polls suggested that the American people were less confident in Obama, and less inclined to give him the Congress he needs to govern in the final years of a second presidential term.

So can this speech restore the political fortunes of Obama and his party?

It's going to be difficult, not just because second terms are always challenging, and not just because his political foes have no qualms about gridlocking government if they think it will benefit their electoral ambitions.

There is also the reality that, while he has returned to popular themes, and displayed his usual grasp of the issues that must be addressed, the president's State of the Union message was muddled. Like other presidents before him, Obama sacrificed the opportunity to focus like a laser beam for the option of reading a laundry list. And some of the items on that laundry list undermined rather than enhanced his "year of action" theme.

That was especially true when, against the pleas of the progressive base he must energize, Obama devoted a section of his speech to promoting a free-trade agenda that is as unpopular as it is flawed.

So it was that, what might have been a politically transformational moment, ended up as something less than that.

To be sure, Obama got a lot right.

He told Congress, bluntly, that he would veto a new sanctions bill that might threaten negotiations to limit Iran's nuclear program. "For the sake of our national security, we must give diplomacy a chance to succeed," said Obama.

He spoke up for sound environmental and energy policy:

The shift to a cleaner energy economy won't happen overnight, and it will require tough choices along the way. But the debate is settled. Climate change is a fact. And when our children's children look us in the eye and ask if we did all we could to leave them a safer, more stable world, with new sources of energy, I want us to be able to say yes, we did.

He renewed the call for comprehensive immigration reform, saying that "[if] we are serious about economic growth, it is time to heed the call of business leaders, labor leaders, faith leaders, and law enforcement-and fix our broken immigration system."

He spoke, in detail and convincingly, for the extension of long-term unemployment benefits that expired at the end of last year. "Congress," he demanded, with appropriate passion, "give these hardworking, responsible Americans that chance. They need our help, but more important, this country needs them in the game."

And he said the right thing, particularly on the issue of raising the minimum wage:

Today, the federal minimum wage is worth about twenty percent less than it was when Ronald Reagan first stood here. [Iowa Senator] Tom Harkin and [California Congressman] George Miller have a bill to fix that by lifting the minimum wage to $10.10. It's easy to remember: ten-ten. This will help families. It will give businesses customers with more money to spend. It doesn't involve any new bureaucratic program. So join the rest of the country. Say yes. Give America a raise.

Going big on the minimum wage offers a measure of the president's seriousness when it comes to making income inequality an issue in 2014.

It's a winning move politically: the president was spot-on when he said, "Americans overwhelmingly agree that no one who works full time should ever have to raise a family in poverty." Aiming to get the minimum wage over $10 an hour-in several steps over several years-is far from radical. Indeed, if the goal is to assure that Americans who put in forty-hour weeks can climb out of poverty, a $15-an-hour wage is closer to the mark. But breaking the double-digit barrier has meaning, practically and politically, and focusing on it frames the 2014 debate in the right way.

But the president used previous State of the Union addresses to talk about increasing the minimum wage. In a "year of action," good words must be linked with good deeds.

Obama recognizes that if he hopes to rally the American people to put pressure on a dysfunctional Congress to begin raising wages-and to get serious about increasing support for manufacturing, investing in infrastructure and generally being useful-his actions must be as bold as his statements. So the White House announced Tuesday morning that Obama would issue an executive order to increase the wages of new federal contract workers to $10.10 an hour. That's a big deal. According to the National Employment Law Project, three in four workers in service-industry federal contract jobs earn less than $10 per hour-and survey research confirms that the overwhelmingly majority of them have trouble paying their bills.

With his executive order, Obama aided contract workers. He sent an important signal to private-sector employers, especially those in the fast-food and retail sectors where workers have been organizing for better wages. And he did something else. To the immense frustration of Republicans in the House and Senate, he declared, "Wherever and whenever I can take steps without legislation to expand opportunity for more American families, that's what I'm going to do."

Making those commitments-to fight for a big hike in the federal minimum wage and to use exacutive orders to act on behalf of workers who do not have enough champions in Congress-was a show of strength.

That provided Obama with an opening to change the discourse.

Unfortunately, he narrowed that opening by putting too much time and energy into promoting a free-trade agenda about which most Democrats in Congress have raised objections. There was nothing robust or exciting about Obama's free-trade pitch. There was something entirely predictable, almost routinized about it. But like George W. Bush and Bill Clinton before him, Obama embraced an orthodoxy that no longer makes economic or political sense.

After arguing for "new trade partnerships with Europe and the Asia-Pacific," Obama told Congress, "We need to work together on tools like bipartisan trade promotion authority."

It is no secret that the president wants to cut the deals that are required to establish the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a sweeping new "NAFTA on steroids" trade pact with eleven Asian and Latin American countries. Nor is it any secret that he would like to clear the way for that agreement by getting Congress to give him the fast-track trade promotion authority that allows negotiations to go forward without congressional oversight or amendments that might address labor rights, human rights, environmental and development concerns.

The problem is that the constituencies Obama is hoping to rally in support of initiatives to address income inequality have come to associate multilateral arrangements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement with the collapse of industries, the shuttering of factories and the elimination of hundreds of thousands of well-paid jobs that once sustained middle-class families. The loss of those jobs-in combination with the related weakening of industrial unions and the depression of wages-is well understood to have contributed mightily to the growth of income inequality.

By whom?

By candidate Barack Obama.

In February, 2008, Obama was on his way to defeating Hillary Clinton in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination. The pair would square off in Wisconsin, and Obama was determined to win on the basis of superior economic stances. So he went to a General Motors plant in Janesville, a community that had already suffered more than its share of downsizing, outsourcing and offshoring. (And that would suffer even more when, in the waning days of George W. Bush's presidency, GM initiated the closure of the plant where Obama spoke.)

"We are not standing on the brink of recession due to forces beyond our control," Obama told the assembled workers. "It was a failure of leadership and imagination in Washington-the culmination of decades of decisions that were made or put off without regard to the realities of a global economy and the growing inequality it's produced."

Obama traced the roots of that growing inequality to "a Washington where decades of trade deals like NAFTA and China have been signed with plenty of protections for corporations and their profits, but none for our environment or our workers who've seen factories shut their doors and millions of jobs disappear; workers whose right to organize and unionize has been under assault for the last eight years."

Obama made the right connections on that winter day in Wisconsin six years ago, anticipating the pile of studies that tell us free trade is not working. The Peterson Institute for International Economics attributes close to 40 percent of the growth in US wage inequality to trade policies of recent decades. The Economic Policy Institute recently published an analysis headlined: "China trade drives down US wages and benefits and eliminates good jobs for US workers." The US Bureau of Labor Statistics confirms that two-thirds of displaced manufacturing workers who found new jobs in 2012 were hired at substantially lower wages-with most experiencing a a 20 percent or greater cut.

Noting that even supporters of past free-trade pacts now acknowledge the role they have played in widening the gap between rich and poor, Public Citizen Global Trade Watch director Lori Wallach reminds us that "economists of all stripes [now] agree that US trade policy has been one of the major contributors to growing US income inequality."

That's not a new concept. It's the one that Barack Obama talked about when he was winning the confidence of Democrats as a candidate in 2008. He distinguished himself from Hillary Clinton by unequivocally stating that "when I am President, I will not sign another trade agreement unless it has protections for our environment and protections for American workers."

Now Barack Obama is president. And he is trying once more to win the confidence of Americans, to get them engaged in a serious battle to renew what he described in 2008 as "the promise of America-that our prosperity can and must be the tide that lifts every boat; that we rise or fall as one nation; that our economy is strongest when our middle-class grows and opportunity is spread as widely as possible. And when it's not-when opportunity is uneven or unequal-it is our responsibility to restore balance, and fairness, and keep that promise alive for the next generation. That is the responsibility we face right now, and that is the responsibility I intend to meet as President of the United States."

Obama was right six years ago. A president can do a great deal to restore balance and fairness in America-and around the world. He is taking some important steps, on the minimum wage and a host of other issues. But he has to recognize that he cannot restore balance and fairness by proposing new free-trade deals that extend the worst practices of old free-trade deals. To build the confidence that is necessary, and the coalitions that are possible, Obama should in his State of the Union address have done what he did as a candidate and acknowledge "the realities of a global economy and the growing inequality it's produced."

He didn't quite get there Tuesday night.

And it will make it harder to achieve the "year of action" that the president is right to say that America desperately needs.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
"Progressive Kristallnacht Coming?" - Wall Street Journal Headline Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=20877"><span class="small">William Boardman, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Tuesday, 28 January 2014 15:14

Boardman writes: "On January 27, [Thomas James] Perkins was doing a Bloomberg TV exclusive, apologizing for using the word 'Kristallnacht' and pitying himself as a messenger who'd been shot ('as the messenger I have been thoroughly killed by everybody'), but mostly he expressed strong reaffirmation of his message."

Tom Perkins is no ordinary venture capitalist. (photo: Venture Capitalist Times)
Tom Perkins is no ordinary venture capitalist. (photo: Venture Capitalist Times)


"Progressive Kristallnacht Coming?" - Wall Street Journal Headline

By William Boardman, Reader Supported News

28 January 14

 

his is a very dangerous drift in our American thinking. Kristallnacht was unthinkable in 1930; is its descendant 'progressive' radicalism unthinkable now?" - Tom Perkins, January 24, 2014, in the Wall Street Journal

Thomas James Perkins was born in 1932, a year before Adolf Hitler came to Power in Germany and six years before the Nazis escalated their persecution of the Jews to mass murder during Kristallnacht (Crystal Night, the Night of Broken Glass, so-called after the array of broken glass from Jewish synagogues, storefronts, and homes), November 9-10, 1938.

Today, Perkins is an octogenarian multi-millionaire (not a billionaire, he insists), a very successful venture capitalist living in his $multi-million San Francisco penthouse, when he's not living in one of his other $multi-million homes like his mansion in Marin County or his Elizabethan mansion in England (that once belonged to Led Zeppelin guitarist Jimmy Page and that Perkins reportedly has for sale).

"Tom Perkins is no ordinary venture capitalist. Perkins is personally worth $8 billion dollars, and Kleiner Perkins [Perkins was a founder] is also one of the oldest, largest and most respected VC firms in Silicon Valley. It is no exaggeration to say that Perkins personally played a key role in catalyzing the modern American venture capital industry. In sum, this is not a guy who went off his meds and now rants at the world on street corners," wrote Joshua Cohen in the Times of Israel.

His January 24 letter to the editor published in the Wall Street Journal provoked a wave of media ridicule, rebuttal, and hostility that prompted him to write an apology to the Anti-Defamation League for his choice of words. On January 27, Perkins was doing a Bloomberg TV exclusive, apologizing for using the word "Kristallnacht" and pitying himself as a messenger who'd been shot ("as the messenger I have been thoroughly killed by everybody"), but mostly he expressed strong reaffirmation of his message:

"Read the message…. I regret the use of that word [Kristallnacht]. It was a terrible misjudgment. I do not regret the message at all… Any time the majority starts to demonize any minority, no matter what it is, it is wrong and dangerous. No good ever comes from it…. The letter said what I believed. And I believe we have to be careful that we do not demonize anybody and that we don't demonize the most creative part [of society, the rich]."

He presented attractively on TV: mild-mannered, thoughtful, coherent, and responsive to the questions he was asked. But he wasn't asked why he thought it was all right to demonize "progressive radicalism" as the "descendant" of a deliberate Nazi mass atrocity. He wasn't even asked directly what he meant by "progressive radicalism." He wasn't asked if he had ever protested against the demonization of any other minority besides "the rich."

"Writing from the epicenter of progressive thought, San Francisco, I would call attention to the parallels of fascist Nazi Germany to its war on its "one percent," namely its Jews, to the progressive war on the American one percent, namely the "rich." - Tom Perkins, 2014, in the Wall Street Journal

He did not apologize for, much less disown this opinion with which he started his letter. He was not asked to explain how the Nazi government of his childhood could be compared to the anti-government protestors of his old age. He was not asked how "the rich" (including George W. Bush's grandfather) who supported the Nazis into power had somehow become victims even though "the rich" in America mostly compete with each other to own the party in power in the United States.

"I, like many, have tried to understand the 20th century, and the incomprehensible evil of the Holocaust. It cannot be explained. Even to try to explain it is questionable. It was evil," Perkins told Bloomberg TV, before he explained what led him to use "Kristallnacht" in his comparison of Occupy demonstrators to German Nazis:

"I used the word because, during the Occupy of San Francisco by the Occupy Wall Street crowd, they broke the windows in the Wells Fargo Bank. They marched up through our automobile strip. They broke all of the windows in all of the luxury car dealerships. I saw that. I remember that the police just stood by. I thought: this is how that began. That word [Kristallnacht] was in my mind."

Nazi analogies are a common irrelevance in American political discourse, and have been for decades (Godwin's law, also known as Godwin's law of Nazi Analogies, was framed by Mike Godwin in 1990: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1 in 1.").

In that sense, Perkins is merely reflecting a mindless zeitgeist, to which he was exposed in more extreme form as a director (now retired) at the News Corporation (which owns Fox News). [The same day the Journal published Perkins' letter, Free Republic posted a more deeply paranoid piece titled "The Konservativ Kristallnacht is here" online.]

"They were obviously father and son, with the same tall, athletic build. They were so handsome that they could have made money modeling, if anyone could afford to hire them. The aura of money seemed to float around them." - Tom Perkins, 2006, in his novel "Sex and the Single Zillionaire"

Perkins, who in 1972 was a founding partner of Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers, a prominent Silicon Valley venture capital partnership, denied that his choice of words implied any anti-semitism:

"This is not the case. My late partner [Eugene Kleiner] was from Austria and fought in the U.S. Army. We became the deepest of friends during our long association, and he taught me 'never imagine that the unimaginable cannot become real.' He was never comfortable with the extreme political currents in America. He never took our demonization for granted. He would have understood my letter, and would have agreed."

His former firm, on the other hand, did not agree. Kleiner Perkins tweeted on January 24: "Tom Perkins has not been involved in KPCB in years. We were shocked by his views expressed today in the WSJ [Wall Street Journal] and do not agree." Others echoed this sentiment, as summed up by The New York Times three days later.

One of the harshest and most powerful assessments came from venture capitalist Mark Suster's blog: "This is not a mere gaffe that people won't remember in 3 years. Perkins will forever be associated with greed, insensitivity and lack of historical context. If it were my firm I would rebrand as Kleiner….

"We have too much inequality in our country. It's not just a matter of fairness or morality it's a matter of good economics. Having a highly functional middle class is good policy for long-term economic growth. Having a fair society in which lower income families have a shot at social mobility is essential for our security and well being."

On Bloomberg TV, Perkins hinted at some agreement with that opinion: "I am friends with [California Governor] Jerry Brown. I voted for him. I will vote for him even though he raised my taxes 30%. He tells me the number one problem in America is inequality. And that's probably and possibly true."

But Perkins has a different answer to the problem: "It's absurd to demonize the rich…. I am your classical self-made man…. I think the solution is less interference, lower taxes, let the rich do what the rich do, which is get richer. But along the way, they bring everybody else with them."

The "classical self-made man," with degrees from MIT and Harvard, turns out to be a cliché of conservative pseudo-economics, a pale cliché at that, who echoes Reaganomics but votes for Jerry Brown.

Here's Tom Perkins' letter in its entirety. Author Daniel Steel is his ex-wife.

"Progressive Kristallnacht Coming?"

Regarding your editorial "Censors on Campus" (Jan. 18): Writing from the epicenter of progressive thought, San Francisco, I would call attention to the parallels of fascist Nazi Germany to its war on its "one percent," namely its Jews, to the progressive war on the American one percent, namely the "rich."

From the Occupy movement to the demonization of the rich embedded in virtually every word of our local newspaper, the San Francisco Chronicle, I perceive a rising tide of hatred of the successful one percent. There is outraged public reaction to the Google buses carrying technology workers from the city to the peninsula high-tech companies which employ them. We have outrage over the rising real-estate prices which these "techno geeks" can pay. We have, for example, libelous and cruel attacks in the Chronicle on our number-one celebrity, the author Danielle Steel, alleging that she is a "snob" despite the millions she has spent on our city's homeless and mentally ill over the past decades.

This is a very dangerous drift in our American thinking. Kristallnacht was unthinkable in 1930; is its descendant "progressive" radicalism unthinkable now?



William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV, print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS | The State of the Union Speech I Wish Obama Would Deliver Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=7118"><span class="small">Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Tuesday, 28 January 2014 13:30

Gibson writes: "As I speak, there are hundreds of thousands of our fellow Americans with no shelter, having to survive another night of Arctic temperatures in the open. Many of them will die of exposure before morning. Many of them are veterans of our wars, who have been failed by this government in having their basic needs met."

President Obama delivers the 2013 State of the Union Address. (photo: AP)
President Obama delivers the 2013 State of the Union Address. (photo: AP)


The State of the Union Speech I Wish Obama Would Deliver

By Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News

28 January 14

 

y fellow Americans:

I deliver this address at a time of great distress in our nation. Never before have we faced challenges of such severity as we do today. As I speak, there are hundreds of thousands of our fellow Americans with no shelter, having to survive another night of Arctic temperatures in the open. Many of them will die of exposure before morning. Many of them are veterans of our wars, who have been failed by this government in having their basic needs met.

In 2014, so far there has been an average of one school shooting every other day of the school year. Each day we fail to address both the proliferation of weapons in our country and their accessibility to those with criminal records and histories of mental health conditions. Each day that we fail to curb the growing problem of bullying in our schools, it becomes more likely that more of our children will die at the hands of other children. Soon we will have to ask our elected officials if the endorsement of a certain special interest group in the next election has more value than the lives of schoolchildren.

The war in Afghanistan is now the longest continued war in our nation's history, and there is still no end in sight. Each day, our men and women are suffering long-lasting, debilitating physical and mental injuries that they will have to endure for the rest of their lives, for an objective that seems just as out of reach today as it did when my predecessor first committed troops to Afghanistan. And just as our troops are losing their lives in this war, our nation is rapidly losing billions of tax dollars as we struggle to prop up a regime that has proven to be blatantly corrupt and untrustworthy in the eyes of Afghanistan's own people.

The extent of our national intelligence apparatus continues to be exposed in the media, and Americans are learning each day that their Fourth Amendment rights have eroded almost completely. Millions of Americans are justifiably mistrusting of their own government after having learned that everything from their phone calls, emails, text messages, tweets, Facebook posts and even their scores on Angry Birds are being monitored by their government. Many reports have shown that despite the depth of our surveillance, monitoring citizens' everyday behavior hasn't prevented any terrorist attacks. And in numerous polls, Americans have repeatedly said they value their privacy over security.

Despite working many hours for some of the world's richest companies, working Americans are unable to survive on the current minimum wage, let alone move up the economic ladder. Economists report that simply having a job is no longer sufficient for Americans to make it on their own, or to provide a decent living situation for their families. And despite the fact that a majority of Americans on food stamps are working families with one or more jobs, millionaires in Congress are denying those working families access to food.

Our nation's college students have been trapped by a student debt bubble that has grown past $1 trillion dollars. Smart young women and men are entering an increasingly competitive job market with sometimes five to six figures in student debt that will take them the rest of their adult life to pay off. Faced with crushing debt, these young people are not as likely to take risks like starting families, becoming homeowners, and starting businesses.

The same predatory banks that are burying college students in debt have also rooked millions of American homeowners out of their homes with manipulative lending schemes that have led to foreclosure. This means more and more Americans are having to move their families out onto the street, while the banks continue their bad behavior without fear of accountability. In fact, the only accountability that my Department of Justice has been able to manage for these financial criminals has come in the form of settlements amounting to a few weeks profit for these big banks. That must change.

While the richest among our country have recovered from this recession and the stock market has hit numerous record highs in the last year, vast swaths of our country have been left behind and forgotten as unemployment drags on. Even though the official unemployment rate as measured by the Bureau of Labor Statistics hovers around the 7 percent mark, most new jobs have been low-paying, minimum wage jobs that don't pay a living wage. And those numbers don't adequately portray the millions of Americans who have simply stopped looking for work. Long-term unemployment, too often a death sentence for American workers, makes the job search that much more difficult as the gap of time between jobs grows each day. And despite the clear jobs crisis in this country, Congress has still refused to extend a hand to working families who have been kicked to the ground by the recession.

The American people are also justifiably losing confidence in their government as a whole. The corrupting influence of money in politics is a disease that has eaten away at the legitimacy of this government, as more people see that their needs are ignored in favor of moneyed special interests who donate to campaigns. Ninety-six percent of Americans polled by Gallup have said they would like to see the influence of money in politics be reduced. Members of Congress have recently resigned, citing endless fundraising as the reason for their early retirement. Thirty to seventy percent of Congress's time is devoted to calling wealthy donors for campaign contributions, rather than taking questions from constituents. If this continues to go unaddressed, the federal government will derive no more consent from the governed, which, as our founders have taught us, is the basis for just revolt.

But now is not the time for pointing fingers. Americans need solutions, and I am doing everything in my power as president to take positive steps forward.

I have issued an executive order to demand that all companies receiving contracts with federal tax dollars not only pay employees a minimum of fifteen dollars an hour, but also publicly disclose all campaign contributions. The cycle of corruption can only end when that corruption is revealed to all inquiring minds. We must end the days where campaign checks in federal election years result in new federal contracts in inauguration years.

I will also be using my powers as president to appoint advocates to a new Citizens' Community Commission. This task force comprised of everyday Americans will have the duty of studying the effects of homelessness across America, in all fifty states. The commission will also issue a report containing recommendations on how to alleviate homelessness in America. I plan to appoint members from Occupy Madison, in Wisconsin, whose Tiny Homes project has provided living spaces for those who previously had to sleep out in the cold. I'll also appoint members of Utah's Housing Coalition, which is on track to end homelessness in the state by 2015 by giving homes to the homeless. When there are 6 vacant buildings for every homeless person in America, and in a nation as rich as ours, there is no excuse for anyone in this great nation to not have a roof over their head at night.

West Virginia's water crisis has shown us that fossil fuels are an unreliable and unsustainable source of energy for future generations to depend upon, and I have recommended Congress immediately repeal all subsidies for the oil, coal, and natural gas industries in favor of aggressive new investments in renewable energy. I have invited Angela Merkel of Germany to consult the Department of Energy on how to have all American homes and business convert to solar, wind, and biomass-based energy, so our nation can be on track to draw 80 percent of our energy from renewable resources by 2030.

The polar vortex currently blanketing our nation in Arctic temperatures, from North Dakota to Florida, is proof that climate change is happening and is already having a devastating effect on our way of life. I have ordered the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline to come to a halt, and have established a new Sustainable Energy Development Commission to make recommendations on how we can halt the most drastic effects of climate change with more sensible energy policy.

I'm also appointing citizens to a new Green Jobs Creation Commission on how to revitalize our economy by revamping our nation's energy infrastructure to be connected by a renewable energy grid. We can no longer play the fool as our predecessors have when it comes to buying and burning cheap oil by the billions of barrels. We must now make the vitality of future generations a top priority and ensure that our grandchildren's great-grandchildren will have a beautiful planet to inherit, and that we will always have millions of jobs here at home in the maintenance, upkeep, and expansion of a green energy grid.

As Commander-in-Chief, I'll be issuing an executive order to immediately begin the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan, with the goal of having everyone home by the end of next year. In my executive budget recommendation, I'll recommend the portion of the Pentagon budget reserved for the Afghan war be reappropriated to green jobs creation. I will also end the F-35 program's history of broken promises and stretched budgets, and will allocate the program's funding instead to provide a free, public college education for all Americans.

As President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us in his 1961 farewell address, we must be vigilant against the unwarranted influence of military-industrial complex. We failed to do so, and have allowed this complex to morph into a totalitarian surveillance state with its eyes on every American computer screen and mobile phone, as well as the screens and phones of world leaders. I've learned from the outcry of all Americans that our constitutional freedoms must remain strong. I'm demanding Congress repeal the National Security Agency's collection of metadata, as well as the provisions of the Patriot Act that allowed such intrusive surveillance to happen in the first place. Should Congress fail to do so, I encourage you all to look at your representatives' voting records, call 202/224-3121, ask for your congressmen and senators, and demand they respect the constitution.

I've instructed my Department of Justice to indict National Intelligence Director James Clapper for perjury for lying to Congress about the NSA's surveillance capabilities. I've also issued a full pardon to Edward Snowden, and will be awarding him with a Presidential Medal of Freedom upon his return home, for his invaluable efforts to provide the world with the truth about blatant violations of citizens' rights. I'm also pardoning Chelsea Manning, and having her immediately released from Leavenworth. I'll also be issuing her a Presidential Medal of Freedom for truly upholding her oath to protect and defend the constitution from all enemies, foreign AND domestic. I'll pray every day for the Snowden and Manning families' forgiveness for my short-sightedness.

I have instructed new Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen to cease the Fed's buying of mortgage-backed securities to the tune of $40 billion per week, funds to instead be used to purchase delinquent student debt so our students can be free to pursue their goals without the specter of default or bad credit. I have also instructed the Federal Reserve Board of Governors to allow students to borrow federal loans at the same 0.75 percent preferential interest rate given to the big banks. I have also invited Richmond, California, Mayor Gayle McLaughlin to consult the Department of Housing and Urban Development on how to use federal eminent domain to seize foreclosed homes from the banks, and refinance underwater mortgages directly with homeowners, so families can keep their homes and our neighborhoods can remain strong.

Chairwoman Yellen will also be tasked with creating a report on how to convert all twelve Federal Reserve branches into public banks by the end of 2015. It's time the states have a reliable place to store their local and state tax dollars that won't lose them in risky gambles in the Wall Street derivatives casino. The states deserve to have their own transparently-run banks that will make loans for capital projects at very low interest rates, and whose leaders are public employees who make realistic salaries, rather than billionaires who shower themselves with extravagant bonuses at the end of the year. Our economy can never truly recover until public funds are safely stored in public banks.

I have recognized the shortcomings of the Affordable Care Act and am working to make healthcare more affordable for all. I am appointing a new Affordable Care Commission to make recommendations on how we can make sure healthcare is seen as a human right in this country, rather than a commodity only the wealthy and upper-middle class can afford. I'll be appointing Vermont governors Howard Dean, Peter Shumlin, and the leaders of Vermont's public sector union to the commission to make recommendations on how Americans can voluntarily buy into Medicare if they so choose. If it works for our seniors, it can work for the rest of our nation as well.

The latest budget agreement out of Congress still failed to address fundamental inequalities in our tax system. In my next executive budget recommendation, I am calling for new tax brackets for incomes over one million, ten million, 100 million, and 1 billion dollars. I'll also be calling for a 5 percent tax on all estates worth more than three million dollars. I'm additionally recommending a 1 percent sales tax on all Wall Street transactions. And I will refuse to sign off on any more cuts to our public services until Congress ends corporate offshore tax haven abuse. With this new infusion of tax dollars, we can start to adequately fund the public services that so many Americans enjoy and use every day, and provide millions of new jobs to out-of-work Americans.

To right the wrongs inherent in our current two-tiered justice system, I have asked the government of Iceland to consult my Department of Justice on how to properly prosecute financial crimes, and properly hold financial criminals accountable. I am also demanding that my Drug Enforcement Administration re-classify marijuana as a Schedule IV drug rather than a Schedule I drug. There's no excuse for Americans to be incarcerated for putting something into their bodies that is less harmful than alcohol. By having a more honest drug policy, we can start to break the prison-industrial complex that has unfairly targeted poor Americans and Americans of color through arcane drug policy.

I am also demanding the Federal Communications Commission reinforce the principle of a free and open internet by fully committing to the preservation of net neutrality. We cannot allow America's richest telecommunications companies to have sole decision over how fast or slow a website runs. The internet must mirror the principles of a democratic society, and continue to be a hub where all Americans can have access to information. Should my FCC commissioners not respect a free and open internet, I will replace them with commissioners who will.

Our nation has a lot of growing to do before we can truly call this the greatest country in the world. But by righting the biggest wrongs first, we can start to blaze a new path for America that will ensure prosperity for all of her children for generations to come. May God bless us all. Thank you.



Carl Gibson, 26, is co-founder of US Uncut, a nationwide creative direct-action movement that mobilized tens of thousands of activists against corporate tax avoidance and budget cuts in the months leading up to the Occupy Wall Street movement. Carl and other US Uncut activists are featured in the documentary "We're Not Broke," which premiered at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival. He currently lives in Madison, Wisconsin. You can contact him at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it , and follow him on twitter at @uncutCG.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS | The Keystone Preview Reel Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=11104"><span class="small">Charles Pierce, Esquire</span></a>   
Tuesday, 28 January 2014 11:30

Pierce writes: "We're still waiting to see if the president is going to sign off on the rest of Keystone XL pipeline, the continent-spanning death funnel that will bring the world's dirtiest fossil fuels from the environmental moonscape of northern Alberta down through the richest farmland in the world down to the refineries of Texas, whence it will be sold to China."

Charles P. Pierce. (artwork: Boston Globe)
Charles P. Pierce. (artwork: Boston Globe)


The Keystone Preview Reel

By Charles Pierce, Esquire

28 January 14

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqmPcqlbktU

 

e're still waiting to see if the president is going to sign off on the rest of Keystone XL pipeline, the continent-spanning death funnel that will bring the world's dirtiest fossil fuels from the environmental moonscape of northern Alberta down through the richest farmland in the world down to the refineries of Texas, whence it will be sold to China. We say "the rest of the pipeline" because one stretch of it already has been built, and TransCanada, the foreign corporation seeking to build the pipeline, is grabbing up land in Texas because Texas is "business-friendly," which means the state government has the right to sell drilling rights to your spleen.

(To be fair, the Texas Supreme Court stepped in earlier this month to slow things down a bit, at least.)

TransCanada's need to repair the pipeline before it started pumping oil fueled the opposition. So did letters the U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration sent TransCanada in September warning of dents in the pipeline and complaining the company did not use qualified welders. The federal agency gave the pipeline its approval, though, and TransCanada's executives said Wednesday that the spill protections are state of the art. "This is the safest oil pipeline that has been built in America to date," said TransCanada president and CEO Girling.

Dents. And unqualified welders. And ironclad banality. I certainly am reassured. And why would we not believe these guys? What possibly could be the reason?

A natural gas pipeline explosion near Otterburne, Man., 50 kilometres south of Winnipeg, has left thousands without heat as temperatures drop to -20 C, or -34 C with the wind chill. A fire is out after burning for more than 12 hours at the site of a natural gas pipeline explosion near Otterburne, Man., about 50 kilometres south of Winnipeg. But officials say there are now natural gas outages affecting as many as 4,000 people in nearby communities, where temperatures dipped to near -20 C overnight.

Sounds bad.

"Massive, like absolutely massive," he said. "The police were by [Highway] 59 and you could just see little cars out there and you could see in comparison how big the flame was. It was just literally two to 300 metres in the air. And bright, I mean lit up the sky." Tyler Holigroski, wholives in the Otterburnearea, remembers seeing a flickering, bright light in the sky. "Thought it was the neighbours' house or something like that," he said. "I thought there was a fire, but the way it lit the sky, it was like the sun coming up. The only thing is it was flashing. It would get brighter, get dim, get brighter, go dim. "It lit up the whole sky here for half an hour," Holigroski said.

Somebody should look into this.

The pipeline, which is owned by TransCanada, has been temporarily shut down according to a statement from a company spokesman. The statement also said that nearby roads have been closed, and that the company is not aware of any reports of injuries. However, five houses within the vicinity of the fire were evacuated by RCMP and St-Pierre-Jolys Fire Department. The residents of two of the homes have been allowed to return, but police were not letting residents return to the three homes closest to the site. Crews spent most of the day venting the natural gas from the system to eliminate the fuel source for the fire. The company said that process generated a loud noise but posed no risk to the public. By Saturday afternoon, more than 12 hours after it started, TransCanada officials said the fire was out.

Coming soon to a pasture near you.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Stephen Hawking's Blunder on Black Holes Shows Danger of Listening to Scientists, Says Bachmann Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=9160"><span class="small">Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker</span></a>   
Monday, 27 January 2014 14:17

Borowitz writes: "Rep. Bachmann added that all the students who were forced to learn about black holes in college should now sue Dr. Hawking for a full refund."

Michelle Bachmann. (photo: AP)
Michelle Bachmann. (photo: AP)


Stephen Hawking's Blunder on Black Holes Shows Danger of Listening to Scientists, Says Bachmann

By Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker

27 January 14

 

The article below is satire. Andy Borowitz is an American comedian and New York Times-bestselling author who satirizes the news for his column, "The Borowitz Report."

r. Stephen Hawking’s recent statement that the black holes he famously described do not actually exist underscores “the danger inherent in listening to scientists,” Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minnesota) said today.

Rep. Bachmann unleashed a blistering attack on Dr. Hawking, who earlier referred to his mistake on black holes as his “biggest blunder.”

“Actually, Dr. Hawking, our biggest blunder as a society was ever listening to people like you,” said Rep. Bachmann. “If black holes don’t exist, then other things you scientists have been trying to foist on us probably don’t either, like climate change and evolution.”

Rep. Bachmann added that all the students who were forced to learn about black holes in college should now sue Dr. Hawking for a full refund. “Fortunately for me, I did not take any science classes in college,” she said.

Bachmann’s anti-Hawking comments seemed to be gaining traction on Capitol Hill, as seen from the statement by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), Chairman of the House Science Committee, who said, “Going forward, members of the House Science Committee will do our best to avoid listening to scientists.”


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 2971 2972 2973 2974 2975 2976 2977 2978 2979 2980 Next > End >>

Page 2979 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN