RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Call to Action for Detroit: Stop the Water Shut Offs and Restore Democracy Print
Thursday, 10 July 2014 09:21

Excerpt: "On July 18 thousands of activists and dozens of organizations will converge on downtown Detroit to protest the privatization of the city's assets and the disconnection of water to tens of thousands of low-income residents."

Demonstrators protesting water shut-offs in Detroit. (photo: Detroit Water Brigade)
Demonstrators protesting water shut-offs in Detroit. (photo: Detroit Water Brigade)


Call to Action for Detroit: Stop the Water Shut Offs and Restore Democracy

By Ben Ptashnik and Victoria Collier, Reader Supported News

10 July 14

 

Oh, make you wanna holler
The way they do my life
This ain't livin', this ain't livin'
No, no baby, this ain't livin'
No, no, no, no
--Marvin Gaye, "Inner City Blues"

n July 18 thousands of activists and dozens of organizations will converge on downtown Detroit to protest the privatization of the city’s assets and the disconnection of water to tens of thousands of low-income residents. The UN has called the shutoff a human rights violation. Demonstrators from around the country will rally in Hart Plaza at 1 pm, linking arms with the citizens of Detroit to protest the hostile corporate takeover by Wall Street banks and their ALEC-led political allies in the Michigan Statehouse, including Governor Rick Snyder.

July 18 marks the one-year anniversary of the announcement by Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr that Detroit must file for bankruptcy—a decision that County Judge Rosemarie Aquilina immediately ruled violates the Michigan Constitution and state law and must be withdrawn. “I have some very serious concerns because there was this rush to bankruptcy court that didn’t have to occur and shouldn’t have occurred,” Aquilina stated. Orr and Snyder managed to circumvent her ruling, and the bankruptcy proceeded. The next few months will determine how successful they will be.

On July 4 the activist community of Detroit put out this call to action:

“We call on activists everywhere to come to Detroit on Friday, July 18th, for a rally and march to fight the dictatorship of emergency manager Kevyn Orr, appointed by millionaire Republican Governor Rick Snyder, and backed by Wall Street bankers and the 1 percent. Under a state-imposed bankruptcy, the City of Detroit workers face severe cuts to their pensions and tens of thousand people face water shut-offs.

"The banks, which have destroyed Detroit's neighborhoods through racist predatory sub-prime mortgages and saddled the city of Detroit with fraudulent financing, continue to loot the people of Detroit.

Detroiters have lost their democratic rights – 'elected' officials serve at the pleasure of the unelected Emergency Manager – and may be fired at any time.”

-- Detroit Moratorium Now and Freedom Fridays Coalition

Starting July 15, the Federal Bankruptcy Court in downtown Detroit will be holding hearings, and the people of Detroit will be speaking out against the emergency manager's economic "Plan of Adjustment."

The people of Detroit, 83 percent of whom are African American, know that their crisis was manipulated to force bankruptcy. In 2012, they fought to get a public initiative on the Michigan ballot, which overwhelmingly defeated Public Act 4, the anti-democratic law that granted the emergency manager complete authority over local officials, the power to nullify public rulings and bodies, and to strip unions of collective bargaining rights and health benefits.

But so intent were the right-wing legislature and Governor Rick Snyder to subvert the will of the people that in a lame duck session immediately following the referendum, the legislature issued a newer version of the law, Public Act 436, which they attached to an appropriation bill. It was a parliamentary trick that eliminated the possibility of another referendum.

Many Detroiters believe that the aggressive foreclosures and water shutoffs are a deliberate scheme to shock the population, drive longtime residents out of the city center, seize property, and gentrify downtown Detroit and the waterfront. This game-plan was played out in Benton Harbor, Michigan, also forced into emergency management, where corporate vultures grabbed a chunk of the city’s waterfront to build a golf course.

Detroit was no more “bankrupt” than many American cities suffering post-2008 loss of their real estate tax base, a crisis caused directly by Wall Street and the very same banks now promoting Detroit’s bankruptcy. Motor City was particularly devastated by the sub-prime mortgage schemes, which targeted African-Americans, whom the banks knew could not afford the loans they promoted. Detroit had the largest percentage of sub-prime victims per capita of any city in the United States. Foreclosures rates continue to be among the highest in the country.

The 2008 Ponzi scheme market collapse also led to $1.5 billion in budget-fix loans foisted on Detroit by a bank consortium led by Bank of America -- loans connected to the LIBOR interest rate manipulation crimes, for which the banks were indicted and fined. According to Bloomberg News, these faulty loans were coupled with unnecessary default insurance schemes sold by disreputable brokers to a corrupt Detroit mayor, who saddled the city with over $474 million in default swap costs. The mayor was later convicted and jailed on charges of racketeering and bribery.

But the banks were given a free ride, and now demand full payment. Many cities with almost the same financial red ink as Detroit, including Chicago, renegotiated bad loans with help from their state capitols, but Detroit is being held hostage. After the right-wing takeover of Michigan’s legislature in 2010, and the election of Governor Snyder, the Tea Party-led Republicans repealed the business tax so that the state lost over a billion dollars in revenue in 2013 alone, replacing it with $1.8 billion in cuts to schools. The legislature then backed out of previously allocated revenue-sharing funds to the city.

The same right-wing politicians and business interests then deliberately confused long-term solvency of the city pension obligations with short-term cash flow to accentuate the appearance of a financial crisis, according to Tom Barrow, mayoral candidate, CPA, and former head of the Michigan Licensing Board of Accountancy.

Jones Day, a Wall Street-connected law firm, which stood to gain $100 million in fees for the bankruptcy, issued a report on behalf of the state that was rife with subjective, editorializing subheads such as UNSUSTAINABLE RETIREE BENEFITS and HIGH LABOR COSTS AND RESTRICTIVE EMPLOYMENT TERMS. Bond market expert Kate Long indicated that the Detroit pension fund was actually "reasonably well funded according to national standards.”

Emergency Manager Orr, coincidentally also a former Jones Day partner, claimed he only made the “tough decision to file bankruptcy reluctantly after thorough negotiations with creditors, pension trustees and public sector unions.” In fact, Orr, Snyder, Detroit’s Democratic mayor, and the powerful financial interests behind them had conspired for months to use federal bankruptcy laws to circumvent legal obstacles regarding pensions, according to the leaked emails dating back to January 2013, provided by Robert Davis, a local political figure associated with AFCSME.

Tom Barrow described how Orr and Snyder surreptitiously rushed to preempt an injunction filed by pension trustees and public-sector unions who were seeking to block bankruptcy on the grounds that it would lead to unconstitutional pension cuts. While in court, attorneys for Snyder asked for a courtesy five-minute delay, during which Orr’s attorneys surreptitiously filed the bankruptcy petition, preempting the injunction.

The bankruptcy continues to slog through the courts, even though it became evident that Detroit's financial “emergency” was as blatant a fabrication as the WMDs -- the weapons of mass “distraction” contrived as the rationale for the privatized invasion and occupation of Iraq. Detroiters are witnessing the same "shock" strategy used internationally by right-wing ideologues who employ corrupt political, military and police power to advance the so-called free market reform. This long-term agenda of the Milton Friedman Chicago School of Economics is actually a formula for aggressive public asset seizure.

In her seminal book, Shock Doctrine, Naomi Klein explains how historically a "softening up" process of collective shocks have been employed by the Chicago School internationally to stun the populace, paralyze their democratic process, and force austerity and mass-privatization down their throats through Structural Adjustment Programs (SAP)--see Detroit's Emergency "Plan of Adjustment"--that literally sap the lifeblood and wealth of nations.

Such vulture capitalism attacks were perpetrated in Chile and Argentina with the aid of corrupt dictators. In Russia and China, political suppression “shocks” preceded a privatization of public assets by Russian oligarchs and Chinese Communist Party “Princelings." After the austerity and privatizations, average citizens inevitably found themselves poorer as excessive debt was serviced off their backs, and lacking in basic public services and education.

Now "shock doctrine" has come home to the United States. Detroit has become Ground Zero for a massive new wave of asset seizures, repression, and corporate exploitation that is beginning to sweep U.S. communities and states, privatizing our schools, water assets and government services. With the end of the Iraq war, and as Latin American democracies reject bank-iinduced debt and austerity, these parasites who prey on civil society have turned their attention from neo-colonialist exploitation to cannibalism at home.

Many in Michigan believe the city could have managed its financial troubles on its own, but Motown was defamed and derided by repeated newspaper editorials, the outstate right wing, and the controlling majority in the legislature as profligate and promiscuous financially. Detroit's citizens were stripped of their right to local political control by democratically elected representatives.

Many Detroiters believe that the August 6, 2013, mayoral primary recount uncovered massive ballot box fraud, which was deliberately ignored. The race featured a white carpetbagger candidate connected to the Wayne County political machine and the state's powerbrokers. Mike Duggan was disqualified from the ballot after a judge ruled him ineligible due to residency. But Duggan eventually won with 40 percent of the vote by waging an historically improbable write-in campaign marred by allegations of fraud, including duplication of ballots and the breaking of a number of ballot box seals. There was no investigation by the Wayne County Board of Canvassers, and the Republican state attorney general later wrote a letter to the board, excoriating their failure to comply with their statutory responsibility. One community activist told us, “We do not recognize Duggan as the mayor, because of the facts uncovered during the recount.”

Detroit is not the first predominantly African-American city subjected to this kind of exploitation. Post-Katrina New Orleans (60 percent African American) was also abandoned and exploited by the political class. In Birmingham Alabama (74 percent minority), JP Morgan was convicted of bribing local power brokers and extracting millions in fees that turned a $250 million dollar sewer project in Jefferson County into a $3 billion debacle. While the county slashed services and laid off almost 1,000 workers. JP Morgan settled in court for $1.6 billion, their profits soared, and their municipal-debt underwriting business - over $64 billion, including Detroit - remained mostly unscathed by the scandal.

“Emergency Management” in Detroit just another term for “hostile corporate takeover” whose major targets are:

  • The tens of billions of dollars in value represented by the city’s huge water systems infrastructure, which supplies 40 percent of Michigan, and sits on 21 percent of the surface fresh water supply of the world.

  • The billions of dollars in Detroit property that could be gentrified and developed once the cronies of the real estate vultures have pushed out its African-American residents.

  • An art museum with a collection valued at billions of dollars.

  • The hundreds of billions of invested capital that are promised to the city pension plans.

The clear attack on pensions is why many Detroit pensioners are voting no to the insidious “grand bargain” being offered right now in the enforced bankruptcy. Pensioners and current employees are being threatened with deeper cuts, if they don’t vote to accept a set of long-term reduction in payments and health benefits, and sign away their right to sue later.

Pensioner Cecily McClellan sees the struggle for pensions as the battle of a lifetime. 'Detroit is the template," she says. "If they are successful here, then they’re going to use it. They have 90,000 municipalities with pensions in the United States. And they’re going after every one. I think that the pension is going to be a form of new wealth for some people. It’s a new market. Just like we had the mortgage bubble and the dotcom bubble, we’re going to have them exploiting pensions.”

The pawns in this crisis, the impoverished residents of Detroit, have already suffered the globalization of this rust belt region, as corporations took their production south, and then abroad. Motor City’s population has been reduced from 1.5 million at its apex in the fifties, to just over 700,000. Half the housing stock is abandoned or set on fire and looted, while city services operate at a fraction of past accommodations—crippling citizen's ability to work and care for their children. The last thing they need is to be viciously set upon by the governor and his “Manager” who now threaten their health by shutting off the water, often without notice, of any resident who is overdue sixty days, on as little as $150 dollars.

Millions of dollars are still owed to the city water department by golf courses, sports arenas and other businesses, and by thousands of homes foreclosed and now owned by banks or corporations, but these have not been subjected to water shut off, even with bills months or years overdue.

As we write this story, on the 4th of July, we believe the people of Detroit have the right to refuse their "consent" to be governed by a vicious regime foisted on them by an imperialist governor. They would be well within the bounds of justice to demand their “unalienable rights," starting with water for their families, and to keep their pensions, which are protected by the Constitution of the State of Michigan.

Detroit is part of the heart and soul of America. Its path should be decided by the people of Detroit themselves, who deserve basic respect, human dignity, and enough water to plant and grow the seeds of their future.

All of you out there in the American heartland, in Michigan and the Midwest, in Chicago, Madison, Toledo, we implore you to “do the right thing” -- get in your cars, on buses and trains, and come to Detroit on July 18, 2014.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
From Voting Battles to Coal Ash Spills, What's Up With North Carolina? Print
Thursday, 10 July 2014 09:18

Curtis writes: "So what happened? Depending on whom you ask, the state has either lost its way or is finding it."

At a North Carolina House Chamber hearing on April 24, 2013, students from North Carolina colleges stage a silent protest against a bill that would require photo ID to vote. (photo: North Carolina NAACP)
At a North Carolina House Chamber hearing on April 24, 2013, students from North Carolina colleges stage a silent protest against a bill that would require photo ID to vote. (photo: North Carolina NAACP)


From Voting Battles to Coal Ash Spills, What's Up With North Carolina?

By Mary C. Curtis, The Washington Post

10 July 14

 

eading into the 21st century, North Carolina was that model Southern state — tradition meets moderation, in everything from its manners to its politics. So what happened? Depending on whom you ask, the state has either lost its way or is finding it. It’s difficult to get anyone to agree about anything these days.

Every week brings a new headline. This week, the spotlight is on the continuing battles over North Carolina’s new voting regulations, enacted last year by a legislature that is controlled by GOP super-majorities with Republican Pat McCrory in the governor’s mansion.

Don’t call it a voter-ID bill, says the Rev. William J. Barber II, the head of the state NAACP, one of the groups challenging the bill. He has labeled it a “monster voter suppression bill.” Beyond requiring specific forms of photo ID — a provision that won’t kick in until 2016 — the law eliminates same-day registration and shortens early voting by a week. It prevents out-of-precinct ballots from being counted for any office, even those that don’t depend on precinct, and expands the ability to challenge voters at the polls. It ends a preregistration program for 16- and 17- year-olds.

“The law targets nearly every aspect of the voting process,” said Penda D. Hair, co-director of the Advancement Project, which is supporting the state NAACP in the suit. It affects “who can vote, where they can vote,” Hair said in a recent call, “when they can vote and how they can vote.”

In a federal court in Winston-Salem, Judge Thomas Schroeder, a George W. Bush appointee, is expected to hear closing arguments Thursday on whether to delay implementation of several of those provisions until 2015 brings a full trial on the bill’s constitutionality. North Carolina’s own figures show that African Americans vote early far more than whites (70 percent versus 51 percent in 2012), use same-day registration more often and are more likely to vote out of precinct. But is that disproportionate impact on black and Latino voters a violation of the parts of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that the Supreme Court did not throw out last year?

The state doesn’t think so, though groups from the League of Women Voters, the ACLU and the U.S. Justice Department, as well as 93-year-old Rosanell Eaton, who had to pass a literacy test to register during the Jim Crow era and testified this week, disagree.

College students, who would be unable to use student IDs, have challenged the law on constitutional grounds, as reported in the New York Times. Each decision to move or consolidate precincts, no longer requiring prior federal approval, is looked at with suspicion, particularly when it affects closing a college-based voting station or one in minority neighborhoods.

Are the midterm elections that important?

Most roads to a Republican majority in the U.S. Senate go through North Carolina.

In last week’s conference call with those challenging the Voter Information Verification Act, its official name, Democratic incumbent Kay Hagan was not mentioned. But the name of her Republican opponent, Thom Tillis, was raised in connection with his support of the law, as North Carolina state House speaker.

Though November is still far away, North Carolina residents have been treated to election ads, reminders from outside groups and Republicans that Hagan is in the same party as Barack Obama, the president who signed and promoted the Affordable Care Act. Many of Hagan’s ads show her saving businesses, helping veterans and looking senatorial. Tillis has walked back and explained words about women and minorities — interpreted in their most unfavorable light by opponents.

And if that’s not exciting enough, there’s the Libertarian candidate, known as Sean Haugh, pizza deliveryman, with his homespun, homemade ads; his candidacy is a wild card that may tip the balance if his message resonates with fed-up voters.

“Moral Monday” protests against conservative legislation, led by Barber, have crossed the state and picked up support from a host of disgruntled groups, from teachers who want a raise to same-sex couples who want legal recognition.

Environmentalists gained steam and support after up to 82,000 tons of wet coal ash spilled from one of Duke Energy’s retired coal-plant sites into North Carolina’s Dan River this year.

The state legislature is currently meeting in Raleigh in a short session. Senate Republicans have walked out before school superintendents testified about proposed cuts of teacher assistant jobs, and other legislators threatened to keep meeting until Christmas as arguments continued over an overdue budget, a notion that must be giving Tillis, caught between presiding and campaigning, headaches.

On the back burner, but not for long, is the fight between the Charlotte City Council and a state-backed Charlotte Airport Commission over control of the Charlotte airport. The commission has been meeting but has little power to do anything until the courts and lawmakers figure it out.

That state of confusion could describe what’s going on in the state of North Carolina where Southern hospitality is in short supply but the fractures are out for all to see.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
His Eminence, Ross Cardinal Douthat Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=11104"><span class="small">Charles Pierce, Esquire</span></a>   
Wednesday, 09 July 2014 15:45

Pierce writes: "His Eminence, Ross Cardinal Douthat, primate of the Archdiocese of Dorkylvania, having issued a previous pastoral letter in which he warned gay people that they ought not to celebrate their right to marry quite so ... gaily was back over the weekend crowing just a bit over the Supreme Court's decision in the Hobby Lobby case which, he says, liberals ought to celebrate, because Hobby Lobby is not a sweatshop."

Ross Douthat. (photo: HBO)
Ross Douthat. (photo: HBO)


His Eminence, Ross Cardinal Douthat

By Charles Pierce, Esquire

09 July 14

 

is Eminence, Ross Cardinal Douthat, primate of the Archdiocese of Dorkylvania, having issued a previous pastoral letter in which he warned gay people that they ought not to celebrate their right to marry quite so ... gaily was back over the weekend crowing just a bit over the Supreme Court's decision in the Hobby Lobby case which, he says, liberals ought to celebrate, because Hobby Lobby is not a sweatshop. (It just buys its inventory from them, and from China, where the government enforces mandatory abortion laws.) Actual liberals, alas, continue stubbornly to ignore His Eminence on the grounds that the magisterium does not contain as much Pecksniffian dweebery as His Eminence apparently believes it does.

Let's leave aside the fact that His Eminence seems puzzled by the concept of an earned benefit. (Let's see the Times cut his bennies, and see if he screams bloody murder about it.) Let's also leave aside the now-customary disinformation about "abortifacients." (At least, unlike George Will, His Eminence states flatly, if incorrectly, that these forms of birth controls cause abortions. Will, as we saw, hides behind the notion that a simple uninformed belief that this is the case is sufficient.) And let us also leave aside the fact that the good liberal company in question has a record on this issue that fairly reeks of hypocrisy and political opportunism. Apparently, the Greens believe that contraception offends their religious liberty only in those cases in which it can't make the Greens a buck or two.

But let us concentrate instead on what His Eminence truly is arguing here—that, by denying their employees a medical benefit those employees have earned by virtue of their being employees, the Greens are contributing to a traditional liberal vision of religious pluralism in this country. (DeToqueville!)

Historically, support for religious liberty in the United States has rested on pragmatic as well as philosophical foundations. From de Tocqueville's America to Eisenhower's, there has been a sense - not universal but widespread - that religious pluralism has broad social benefits, and that the wider society has a practical interest, within reason, in allowing religious communities to pursue moral ends as they see fit. But in the past, tensions over pluralism's proper scope usually occurred when a specific faith - Catholicism and Mormonism, notably - unsettled or challenged the mostly Protestant majority. Today, the potential tensions are much broader, because the goals of postsexual revolution liberalism are at odds with the official beliefs of almost every traditional religious body, be it Mormon or Muslim, Eastern Orthodox or Orthodox Jewish, Calvinist or Catholic. If liberals so desire, this division could lead to constant conflict, in which just about every project conservative believers undertake is gradually threatened with regulation enforcing liberal norms. The health coverage offered by religious employers; the activity of religious groups on college campuses; the treatments offered by religious hospitals; the subject matter taught in religious schools ... the battlegrounds are legion.

There's more going on here that simply Douthat's usual fallback position of sexual panic. (What in the hell do the "goals of postsexual revolution liberalism"—Oy!—have to do with an evangelical group's fight with the administration at Bowdoin College? Once again, to borrow a phrase from Garry Wills, we see Douthat reducing the Gospels to "the mere smithying of chastity belts.") There is a political consensus—which is all that is supposed to matter in the secular law—among the great majority of the members of all the traditional religious bodies that Douthat mentions that birth control is both medically necessary, ethically sound, and theologically benign. The Greens themselves clearly recognize this secular consensus, or else they wouldn't have invested their money in the companies that produce birth control. Unless Douthat is willing to argue that the universally derided and universally ignored Humanae Vitae should be the basis of federal law, or that the Greens somehow have a heretofore unnoticed clerical status beyond their position as employers, the fact is that secular practice ought to trump sectarian doctrine. If nothing else, the people who framed the Constitution believed that. (Also, note well that Douthat links to the Yoder case, involving the Amish and the public schools, and not to the Smith case out of Oregon, which involved native Americans and peyote, and which, because it prompted the enactment of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, is more directly on point as regards Hobby Lobby. This is probably because, far from being consonant with the older ruling, Smith trimmed the Yoder decision back.) What the majority of the Supreme Court did, although the majority never would have the courage to admit it publicly, was to take it upon itself to decide the legitimacy of an individual concept of sin. Take their claim on its face—which I don't, but play along—and the Greens are arguing that being required to provide the earned benefit of contraception medicine to their employees would make them complicit in the sin those employees would commit by using those medicines. That is the heart and soul of the "religious liberty" argument in this case. That is also the sum total of Douthat's argument; otherwise, why is he making the "official beliefs" of" traditional religious bodies" a legitimate governmental interest in the lives of millions of people who might not belong to any of them? "Religious liberty" doesn't exist in a vacuum. In this case, the right of the Greens to practice their religion is not in question In this case, it means to be free from the obligation of being complicit in what you (publicly, at least,) proclaim to be sin. The Supreme Court could not have decided this case were it not willing to determine the legitimacy of the Green family's concept of sin. Good god, is that ever not Sam Alito's job.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS | Why Brazilians Get to Punish Their Politicians for World Cup Fiasco Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=7118"><span class="small">Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Wednesday, 09 July 2014 13:08

Gibson writes: "World Cup host team and 5-time champion Brazil, which Nate Silver picked to win the entire tournament for a sixth time, looked like kindergarten students on the field with Germany yesterday. Wednesday's semifinal in Belo Horizonte is now officially known as the most one-sided beatdown in World Cup semifinals history."

David Luiz and Brazil were put to shame in their match against Germany. (Getty Images)
David Luiz and Brazil were put to shame in their match against Germany. (Getty Images)


Why Brazilians Get to Punish Their Politicians for World Cup Fiasco

By Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News

09 July 14

 

orld Cup host team and 5-time champion Brazil, which Nate Silver picked to win the entire tournament for a sixth time, looked like kindergarten students on the field with Germany yesterday. Wednesday's semifinal in Belo Horizonte is now officially known as the most one-sided beatdown in World Cup semifinals history.

Brazil's tragic loss comes on the heels of the Brazilian government forcefully evicting a quarter of a million people from their homes in the run-up to the cup, bulldozing decades-old properties, and spending $14 billion to build expensive soccer stadiums. As Germany’s 7th and final goal sailed in, the German word “schadenfreude” came to mind. Bluntly, that word translates to “pleasure at the misfortune of others.” Now, the most unfortunate people in Brazil, aside from possibly the Brazilian team’s goalkeeper, are the nation’s political and ruling classes.

The Brazilian government spent over $900 million on a soccer stadium in the national capital of Brasilia, where there is no local soccer team. Brazil’s taxpayers shelled out billions in tax revenues to pay for the construction of the stadiums, despite the majority of people wanting that money to go toward public services like education, health care, jobs, and the social safety net. In Brazil, where inequality has long been at staggering levels, there's never been a greater need for those unfunded services.

The contractors who built the 12 stadiums, four of which cannot be supported by their cities after the World Cup, were mostly donors to the campaigns of politicians who approved the spending. One builder, Andrade Gutierrez, who was awarded over $3 billion in contracts, donated $73,180 during the 2008 municipal elections. And contractors have overcharged the government by roughly $9 billion since FIFA selected Brazil as the host country for the 2014 cup.

When Brazilians tried to exercise their right to nonviolently protest the outright corruption behind the World Cup, they were met with riot police and tear gas canisters. On the eve of the World Cup’s first round, Brazil’s transportation workers went on strike in Sao Paulo, essentially shutting the city down. Unions were hit with a $27,000 fine for each day of the strike, which was called off a day later. City officials marked homes for demolition to make way for tourist accommodations without even contacting homeowners. Homeowners that were given reparations were given an amount in the neighborhood of $10,000 Brazilian Real ($22,000 USD), for property that was worth at least $100,000 Real ($220,000 USD).

All of these injustices were inflicted with the intent of an anticipated World Cup win overshadowing the inequities. The Brazilian government was banking on the forgiveness of the people for their corruption and scandals surrounding the World Cup in exchange for a 6th title. Instead of the trophy, all the Brazilian people have is a demolished, dispirited national team that has to sit out the final in their own home country. This October, when Brazilian voters go to the polls to elect new members of Congress and a new president, they’ll remember the horrors of the 2014 World Cup. Not just the crushing loss to Germany, but the crushing loss of their homes and social services.

This year’s World Cup was just a taste of what’s to come if the current corrupt government continues to rule Brazil. When the country prepares to host the 2016 Summer Olympics, you can bet these same government officials will have no qualms about forcing out more impoverished families to make room for wealthy white tourists. After suffering their most embarrassing loss of all time – live, before the whole world – on top of all the suffering they’ve already had to endure to host the event, Brazilians are pissed. They’re looking for someone to blame. Election Day is right around the corner, and there's no better way to punish corrupt politicians by firing them.



Carl Gibson, 27, is co-founder of US Uncut, a nonviolent grassroots movement that mobilized thousands to protest corporate tax dodging and budget cuts in the months leading up to Occupy Wall Street. Carl and other US Uncut activists are featured in the documentary We're Not Broke, which premiered at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival. Carl is also the author of How to Oust a Congressman, an instructional manual on getting rid of corrupt members of Congress and state legislatures based on his experience in the 2012 elections in New Hampshire. He lives in Sacramento, California.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS | Iraq: What Will the Empire Do? Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=5494"><span class="small">Steve Weissman, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Wednesday, 09 July 2014 11:15

Weissman writes: "So, what will the emperor then do? Walk away in humiliating defeat? Or, however reluctantly, double down on a war he can never win and from which he or his successor will ultimately have to withdraw?"

President Obama speaks to troops at Fort Bragg, N.C., in December 2011. (photo: Gerry Broome/AP)
President Obama speaks to troops at Fort Bragg, N.C., in December 2011. (photo: Gerry Broome/AP)


Iraq: What Will the Empire Do?

By Steve Weissman, Reader Supported News

09 July 14

 

ike it or lump it, Barack Obama has the only vote that counts. As commander in chief of a still potent American empire, he decides how much of our blood and treasure to waste on what could become the third major military intervention in Iraq since the end of the Cold War. He has advisors, constituencies, bureaucracies, financial donors, and legacy to consider. But short of a popular uprising, mutiny, assassination, or conviction upon impeachment, he remains for a time an almost absolute monarch, the lone decider.

Few outsiders truly grasp what this means. Think back to his predecessor, the incomparable George W. Bush. Almost everyone claims to know exactly why he ordered a war of choice against Iraq, and they make their claims with self-deluding certainty, as if the intervention had only a single motivation:

It was the oil, stupid. Hadn’t Vice President Dick Cheney come to office as CEO of the oil services giant Halliburton? Didn’t he continue to meet with industry executives on his Energy Task Force during the run-up to the war? Would he have been so gung-ho if Iraq had only olive oil? But wait. Might he have believed the nonsense he spouted about Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction and links to al Qaeda? Or, bully that he is, could he have primarily wanted to throw Saddam against the wall to show other nations in the region and beyond that the American empire meant business in both senses of the word?

No, you idiot, it was the Jews – or more politely the neocons – doing Israel’s bidding. Or the Christian Evangelicals – the theo-cons – expressing their hatred of Muslims. Or the military industrial complex pursuing their love of Pentagon contracts.

Cheney and the others all pushed Bush hard to follow their lead. But, as he loved to remind us, he was “the decider.” So whose advice, if any, persuaded him? It could as easily have been the voice he heard in his head as his “higher father.”

“I’m driven with a mission from God,” the Palestinian negotiator Nabil Shaath claims to have heard him say at a meeting in June 2003. “God would tell me, ‘George, go and fight those terrorists in Afghanistan.’ And I did, and then God would tell me, ‘George go and end the tyranny in Iraq,” and I did.”

The faith-based Bush expressed similar sentiments when he tried to persuade Jacques Chirac, then president of France, to support America’s war on Iraq. Journalist Kurt Eichenwald tells the story in his book “500 Days,” which Vanity Fair excerpted in October 2012.

“Jacques,” he [Bush] said, “You and I share a common faith. You’re Roman Catholic, I’m Methodist, but we are both Christians committed to the teachings of the Bible. We share one common Lord”

Chirac said nothing. He didn’t know where Bush was going with this. “Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East,” Bush said. ‘’Biblical prophecies are being fulfilled.”

Gog and Magog? What was that, thought Chirac.

“This confrontation,” Bush said, “is willed by God, who wants to use this conflict to erase his people’s enemies before a new age begins.”

Readers will recognize this happy-clappy as a reference to the Rapture, which I decried in detail many years ago in “America's Religious Right: Pie in the Sky.” I raise it here only to make a point that should be obvious, but is obviously not. Where one person – the commander in chief – makes the major foreign policy decisions, knowing for certain what motivated him (or her) would require us to read the emperor’s mind.

Obama is no George W, to be sure. But his motivations are only marginally less perplexing. Presenting himself as a reluctant foreign policy realist in the tradition of W’s earthly father, Obama too often seems – as John Cassidy wrote in The New Yorker – “about eighty per cent Brent Scowcroft/John Mearsheimer and about twenty per cent Paul Wolfowitz/Samantha Power.”

Talk about Obama mixing his messages. Scowcroft was George H.W. Bush’s national security adviser and remains his doppelganger. Mearsheimer teaches “offensive neorealism” at the University of Chicago and co-wrote “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy.” Wolfowitz was the highest-ranking neocon in George W’s administration and – along with Cheney, whose conservatism is anything but neo – the most relentless advocate of attacking Iraq. Power, Obama’s UN Ambassador, is a leading “humanitarian hawk,” regularly urging Washington to intervene in some other country to do good and fight evil.

Obama tried to strike a careful balance in his speech at the West Point commencement at the end of May. “I believe that a world of greater freedom and tolerance is not only a moral imperative; it also helps keep us safe,” he declared. “But to say that we have an interest in pursuing peace and freedom beyond our borders is not to say that every problem has a military solution. Since World War II, some of our most costly mistakes came not from our restraint but from our willingness to rush into military adventures without thinking through the conse­quences, without building international support and legitimacy for our action, without levelling with the American people about the sacrifices required.”

Will this professorial balance keep him from getting dragged back into Iraqi Quagmire 3.0? It is still too early to know. So far, he has sent only a few hundred troops back into the country, and as far as the public knows, he sent them without a status of forces agreement to hold them immune from any Iraqi prosecution. The absence of such an agreement is the reason Obama gives for refusing to leave 10,000 troops in Iraq in 2009.

As Cassidy points out, Obama continues to identify terrorism as the “biggest direct threat to America at home and abroad,” which frames the issue in a way that favors further intervention. Obama has also defined America’s national interests in exceptionally broad terms. He claims to want nothing more than to prevent “an all-out civil war inside of Iraq” and to promote regional stability, keep our allies strong, and protect “global energy markets.”

If these multiple goals are truly why Obama acted, they are imperial in scope, and it’s hard to see how a few hundred soldiers, drones, and even larger unacknowledged airstrikes or other covert trickery can possibly get the job done. Nor would even ten thousand troops be enough to force the Shiite majority to accept a political solution that would bring the rebellious Sunnis and independence-minded Kurds into a workable government of national reconciliation.

So, what will the emperor then do? Walk away in humiliating defeat? Or, however reluctantly, double down on a war he can never win and from which he or his successor will ultimately have to withdraw? Whatever Obama and his advisors are now telling themselves, more war seems all too likely, followed by the regional chaos of a loser’s peace.



A veteran of the Berkeley Free Speech Movement and the New Left monthly Ramparts, Steve Weissman lived for many years in London, working as a magazine writer and television producer. He now lives and works in France, where he is researching a new book, "Big Money and the Corporate State: How Global Banks, Corporations, and Speculators Rule and How to Nonviolently Break Their Hold."

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 2781 2782 2783 2784 2785 2786 2787 2788 2789 2790 Next > End >>

Page 2790 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN