RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
What I Did After Police Killed My Son Print
Thursday, 04 December 2014 13:49

Bell writes: "It took six years to get our wrongful death lawsuit settled, and my family received $1.75 million. But I wasn't satisfied by a long shot."

(photo: unknown)
(photo: unknown)


What I Did After Police Killed My Son

By Michael Bell, Politico

04 December 14

 

fter police in Kenosha, Wis., shot my 21-year-old son to death outside his house ten years ago — and then immediately cleared themselves of all wrongdoing — an African-American man approached me and said: “If they can shoot a white boy like a dog, imagine what we’ve been going through.”

I could imagine it all too easily, just as the rest of the country has been seeing it all too clearly in the terrible images coming from Ferguson, Mo., in the aftermath of the killing of Michael Brown. On Friday, after a week of angry protests, the police in Ferguson finally identified the officer implicated in Brown's shooting, although the circumstances still remain unclear.

I have known the name of the policeman who killed my son, Michael, for ten years. And he is still working on the force in Kenosha.

Yes, there is good reason to think that many of these unjustifiable homicides by police across the country are racially motivated. But there is a lot more than that going on here. Our country is simply not paying enough attention to the terrible lack of accountability of police departments and the way it affects all of us—regardless of race or ethnicity. Because if a blond-haired, blue-eyed boy — that was my son, Michael — can be shot in the head under a street light with his hands cuffed behind his back, in front of five eyewitnesses (including his mother and sister), and his father was a retired Air Force lieutenant colonel who flew in three wars for his country — that’s me — and I still couldn’t get anything done about it, then Joe the plumber and Javier the roofer aren’t going to be able to do anything about it either.

I got the phone call at 2 a.m. on Nov. 9, 2004. It was my oldest daughter. She said you need to come to the hospital right away, Michael’s been shot by the police. My first gut reaction was, “Michael doesn’t do anything serious enough to get shot by a police officer.” I thought he’d gotten shot in the leg or whatever. When I arrived, I saw the district attorney huddled with about five police officers. The last time I saw my son alive he was on a gurney, with his head wrapped in a big towel and blood coming out of it. I learned that an officer had put his gun up directly to Michael’s right temple and misfired, then did it again, and shot him.

From the beginning I cautioned patience, though Michael’s mother and sister were in an uproar. They had watched him get shot. But as an Air Force officer and pilot I knew the way safety investigations are conducted, and I was thinking that this was going to be conducted this way. Yet within 48 hours I got the message: The police had cleared themselves of all wrongdoing. In 48 hours! They hadn’t even taken statements from several eyewitnesses. Crime lab reports showed that my son’s DNA or fingerprints were not on any gun or holster, even though one of the police officers involved in Michael’s shooting had claimed that Michael had grabbed his gun.

The officer who killed my son, Albert Gonzalez, is not only still on the force ten years later, he is also a licensed concealed-gun instructor across the state line in Illinois—and was identified by the Chicago Tribune in an Aug. 7 investigative story as one of “multiple instructors [who] are police officers with documented histories of making questionable decisions about when to use force.”

From the beginning I allowed the investigation to proceed and didn’t know it was a sham until many of the facts were discovered. But before long I realized a cover-up was under way. I hadn’t understood at first how closely related the DA and the police were—during his election campaign for judge, the DA had been endorsed in writing by every police agency in the county. Now he was investigating them. It was a clear conflict of interest.

The police claimed that one officer screamed that Michael grabbed his gun after they stopped him, for reasons that remain unclear though he was slightly intoxicated, and then Gonzalez shot him, sticking the gun so close against his temple that he left a muzzle imprint. Michael wasn’t even driving his own car. He’d been out with a designated driver, but the designated driver drank and was younger, and so my son made the decision to drive.

Wanting to uncover the truth, our family hired a private investigator who ended up teaming up with a retired police detective to launch their own investigation. They discovered that the officer who thought his gun was being grabbed in fact had caught it on a broken car mirror. The emergency medical technicians who arrived later found the officers fighting with each other over what happened. We filed an 1,100-page report detailing Michael's killing with the FBI and US Attorney.

It took six years to get our wrongful death lawsuit settled, and my family received $1.75 million. But I wasn’t satisfied by a long shot. I used my entire portion of that money and much more of my own to continue a campaign for more police accountability. I wanted to change things for everyone else, so no one else would ever have to go through what I did. We did our research: In 129 years since police and fire commissions were created in the state of Wisconsin, we could not find a single ruling by a police department, an inquest or a police commission that a shooting was unjustified. There was one shooting we found, in 2005, that was ruled justified by the department and an inquest, but additional evidence provided by citizens caused the DA to charge the officer. The city of Milwaukee settled with a confidentiality agreement and the facts of that sealed. The officer involved committed suicide.

The problem over many decades, in other words, was a near-total lack of accountability for wrongdoing; and if police on duty believe they can get away with almost anything, they will act accordingly. As a military pilot, I knew that if law professionals investigated police-related deaths like, say, the way that the National Transportation Safety Board investigated aviation mishaps, police-related deaths would be at an all time low.

And so, together with other families who lost loved ones, I launched a campaign in the Wisconsin legislature calling for a new law that would require outside review of all deaths in police custody. I contacted everybody I could. In the beginning, I contacted the governor’s office, the attorney general and the U.S. attorney for Wisconsin. They didn’t even return my phone calls or letters. I even contacted Oprah, every Associated Press bureau in the nation, every national magazine and national news agency and didn’t hear a word.

But Frank Serpico, the famous retired New York City police detective, helped. He had his own experience taking on police corruption. I set up billboards and a website and took out newspaper ads, including national ads in the New York Times and USA Today, and Serpico allowed me to use his endorsement. “When police take a life, should they investigate themselves?” the ad read.

Finally we began to get some movement, helped by a friendly Republican legislator, Garey Bies, and a Democratic assemblyman named Chris Taylor, in August of 2012. In April of this year we passed a law that made Wisconsin the first state in the nation to mandate at legislative level that police-related deaths be reviewed by an outside agency. Ten days after it went into effect in May, local police shot a man sleeping on a park bench 15 times. It’s one of the first incidents to be investigated under the new law.

I’m not anti-cop. And I am finding that many police want change as well: The good officers in the state of Wisconsin supported our bill from the inside, and it was endorsed by five police unions. But I also think the days of Andy Griffith and the Mayberry peacekeeper are over. As we can see in the streets of Ferguson, today’s police are also much more heavily equipped, armed and armored—more militarized. They are moving to more paramilitary-type operations as well, and all those shifts call for more transparency and more rules of restraint. And yet they are even less accountable in some ways than the U.S. military in which I served. Our citizens need protection from undue force, here in our own country, and now.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS | Why America Needs Reverend William Barber to Run for President Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=7118"><span class="small">Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Thursday, 04 December 2014 10:12

Gibson writes: "Picture a candidate on the presidential debate stage in 2016 who, in a single hour, could completely demolish Republican arguments with morality."

The Rev. William Barber is a leader of the Moral Monday movement for social justice. (photo: unknown)
The Rev. William Barber is a leader of the Moral Monday movement for social justice. (photo: unknown)


Why America Needs Reverend William Barber to Run for President

By Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News

04 December 14

 

“Labor rights are not left or right issues, women’s rights are not left or right issues, education is not a left or right issue, helping people when they’re unemployed is not left or right. Those issues are the moral center of who we are, and it’s high time that we recover the moral dialogue in this nation.”

~ Rev. William Barber II

icture a candidate on the presidential debate stage in 2016 who, in a single hour, could completely demolish Republican arguments with morality. This candidate would frame ending poverty, providing healthcare, and bolstering education as moral responsibilities, citing the Constitution and the Bible throughout. As a Southerner, this candidate would pick up Southern voters. As a clergy member, this candidate would pick up religious voters. And as someone who doesn’t come from Washington, this candidate would pick up apathetic voters. When this candidate is through speaking, Republican politicians who normally fly the moral and constitutional flags would suddenly have no moral or constitutional credibility.

So who is this candidate? Rev. William Barber II, the charismatic president of the North Carolina NAACP and fiery voice of the Moral Monday movement.

“They can deride us, they can deflect from the issue, but they can’t debate us when we make our case on moral and constitutional grounds.”

~ Rev. William Barber II

Whether he’s debating Rand Paul, Chris Christie, Ted Cruz, or Ben Carson, Rev. Barber’s brand of religious populism is the secret weapon that exposes all of America’s most ardent right-wing politicians as immoral. Barber carries around a copy of the Poverty and Justice Bible, containing over 2,000 scriptures that bolster arguments for a stronger social safety net, like providing healthcare for the sick, food for the hungry, and compassion for the less fortunate. As the spiritual leader of North Carolina’s Forward Together movement, Barber has mastered the art of framing progressive economic populism in a moral and religious narrative, effectively making it impossible for the Republicans in power to debate those policies.

“There is a longing for a moral compass … We need a transformative moral fusion movement that’s indigenously led, state-based, deeply moral, deeply Constitutional, anti-racist, anti-poverty, pro-justice, and pro-labor, a movement that brings people together ... We need to build long-term, not just for one issue or one campaign.”

~ Rev. William Barber II

In late 2006, Rev. Barber and the North Carolina NAACP organized the Historic Thousands on Jones Street (HKonJ) coalition, long before the Republican takeover of the North Carolina statehouse. They mobilized for a 14-point agenda based on economic, political, environmental, and racial justice, and successfully passed legislation through consistent advocacy. But after retail billionaire Art Pope financed the Republican takeover of 2010 and funded Gov. Pat McCrory’s successful bid for governor in 2012, the state legislature rolled back HKonJ’s gains, piece by piece.

“The governor has called us leftists and socialists … We say to them, if we are leftists in fighting for justice and fairness for all people, then the Bible and the Constitution are the Magna Carta of leftist documents.”

~ Rev. William Barber II

Rev. Barber and the movement he spent years organizing began assembling people on the statehouse lawn every Monday for an evening of speeches, protests, and mass civil disobedience for 64 weeks straight, called Moral Mondays. Over those 64 weeks, more than 1,000 people were willingly arrested (full disclosure: I was arrested at Moral Monday in June of 2013 as part of my research for this article about Moral Mondays) and crowd estimates reached as high as 80,000 people on a given week. Each separate Moral Monday was focused on a different issue: from voting rights, to reproductive rights, to environmental justice, to unemployment extensions, to Medicaid expansion, public education and more. And each week, Rev. Barber gave a rousing speech to the thousands gathered about the moral basis of each issue.

“Isaiah chapter 10 reads, ‘Woe to those who legislate evil, and rob the poor of their rights and make children and women their prey.’ That’s why I tell my progressive friends, you’ve got to stop throwing away the Bible. There’s too much good stuff in there.”

~ Rev. William Barber II

What Rev. Barber brings to the table that even Washington’s most outspoken populists like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders do not, is the open embrace of Christianity to frame progressive populism. Warren and Sanders are eloquent speakers and great standard-bearers for today’s progressive movement, but they still are only able to communicate in terms that don’t reach outside of their respective audiences. Voters who are deeply Christian tend to favor right-wing politicians who claim they’re the moral candidate due to their views on abortion and marriage. But Rev. Barber skillfully steals their thunder with his experience as a pastor and his knowledge of the Bible.

“I’ve looked at the religious right’s agenda of being against people who are homosexual, and being for prayer in the school, and being against abortion. I can find about 5 scriptures that may speak to those issues, and 4 of them they misinterpret. But none of them took this ethical demand – that you love your neighbor as yourself.”

~ Rev. William Barber II

Voters who turned out in record-low numbers for the 2014 midterms were widely distrustful of Congress, with only 10 percent approving of the job Washington politicians were doing. Voters also expressed frustration with both Democrats and Republicans. But if Rev. Barber were to run as an Independent candidate in 2016 on his platform of moral populism, he would attract national and international attention, and other candidates would be climbing over each other to win his endorsement. Even if Barber ran not to win, but to force Democrats and Republicans to answer his calls for a moral awakening in Washington rooted in populist values, it would completely change the game.

“You need somebody who is a person of faith to say to the religious right, ‘You want a moral debate? Bring it on, baby.’”

~ Rev. William Barber II

Barber may not have experience as a legislator or governor, but he’s proven himself as a leader capable of organizing thousands for social justice in a Republican-led Southern state. While Barber himself urges his audiences to not seek salvation from a single political candidate, and insists that movements come not from DC, but from communities organizing for justice in individual states, he could serve as the anchor for that state-based social movement that he’s quietly built over the last decade, shake people out of their apathy, and inspire voters to take action beyond the ballot box. And ultimately, that’s the only thing that’s ever brought about lasting change.

“You don’t have enough political power to vote us away. You don’t have enough insults to talk us away. And to the Koch Brothers, you don’t have enough damn money to buy us away.”

~ Rev. William Barber II



Carl Gibson, 26, is co-founder of US Uncut, a nationwide creative direct-action movement that mobilized tens of thousands of activists against corporate tax avoidance and budget cuts in the months leading up to the Occupy Wall Street movement. Carl and other US Uncut activists are featured in the documentary "We're Not Broke," which premiered at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival. He currently lives in Madison, Wisconsin. You can contact him at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it , and follow him on twitter at @uncutCG.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
An Economic Agenda for America: 12 Steps Forward Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=15102"><span class="small">Bernie Sanders, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Wednesday, 03 December 2014 13:30

Sanders writes: "The American people must make a fundamental decision. Do we continue the 40-year decline of our middle class and the growing gap between the very rich and everyone else, or do we fight for a progressive economic agenda that creates jobs, raises wages, protects the environment and provides health care for all?"

Bernie Sanders addresses audience. (photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Bernie Sanders addresses audience. (photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)


An Economic Agenda for America: 12 Steps Forward

By Bernie Sanders, Reader Supported News

03 December 14

 

he American people must make a fundamental decision. Do we continue the 40-year decline of our middle class and the growing gap between the very rich and everyone else, or do we fight for a progressive economic agenda that creates jobs, raises wages, protects the environment and provides health care for all? Are we prepared to take on the enormous economic and political power of the billionaire class, or do we continue to slide into economic and political oligarchy? These are the most important questions of our time, and how we answer them will determine the future of our country.

The long-term deterioration of the middle class, accelerated by the Wall Street crash of 2008, has not been pretty. Today, we have more wealth and income inequality than any major country on earth. We have one of the highest childhood poverty rates and we are the only country in the industrialized world which does not guarantee health care for all. We once led the world in terms of the percentage of our people who graduated college, but we are now in 12th place. Our infrastructure, once the envy of the world, is collapsing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ffgQhX0kSA

Real unemployment today is not 5.8 percent, it is 11.5 percent if we include those who have given up looking for work or who are working part time when they want to work full time. Youth unemployment is 18.6 percent and African-American youth unemployment is 32.6 percent.

Today, millions of Americans are working longer hours for lower wages. In inflation-adjusted dollars, the median male worker earned $783 less last year than he made 41 years ago. The median woman worker made $1,337 less last year than she earned in 2007. Since 1999, the median middle-class family has seen its income go down by almost $5,000 after adjusting for inflation, now earning less than it did 25 years ago.

The American people must demand that Congress and the White House start protecting the interests of working families, not just wealthy campaign contributors. We need federal legislation to put the unemployed back to work, to raise wages and make certain that all Americans have the health care and education they need for healthy and productive lives.

As Vermont's senator, here are 12 initiatives that I will be fighting for which can restore America's middle class.

1. We need a major investment to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure: roads, bridges, water systems, waste water plants, airports, railroads and schools. It has been estimated that the cost of the Bush-Cheney Iraq War, a war we should never have waged, will total $3 trillion by the time the last veteran receives needed care. A $1 trillion investment in infrastructure could create 13 million decent paying jobs and make this country more efficient and productive. We need to invest in infrastructure, not more war.

2. The United States must lead the world in reversing climate change and make certain that this planet is habitable for our children and grandchildren. We must transform our energy system away from fossil fuels and into energy efficiency and sustainable energies. Millions of homes and buildings need to be weatherized, our transportation system needs to be energy efficient and we need to greatly accelerate the progress we are already seeing in wind, solar, geothermal, biomass and other forms of sustainable energy. Transforming our energy system will not only protect the environment, it will create good paying jobs.

3. We need to develop new economic models to increase job creation and productivity. Instead of giving huge tax breaks to corporations which ship our jobs to China and other low-wage countries, we need to provide assistance to workers who want to purchase their own businesses by establishing worker-owned cooperatives. Study after study shows that when workers have an ownership stake in the businesses they work for, productivity goes up, absenteeism goes down and employees are much more satisfied with their jobs.

4. Union workers who are able to collectively bargain for higher wages and benefits earn substantially more than non-union workers. Today, corporate opposition to union organizing makes it extremely difficult for workers to join a union. We need legislation which makes it clear that when a majority of workers sign cards in support of a union, they can form a union.

5. The current federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour is a starvation wage. We need to raise the minimum wage to a living wage. No one in this country who works 40 hours a week should live in poverty.

6. Women workers today earn 78 percent of what their male counterparts make. We need pay equity in our country -- equal pay for equal work.

7. Since 2001 we have lost more than 60,000 factories in this country, and more than 4.9 million decent-paying manufacturing jobs. We must end our disastrous trade policies (NAFTA, CAFTA, PNTR with China, etc.) which enable corporate America to shut down plants in this country and move to China and other low-wage countries. We need to end the race to the bottom and develop trade policies which demand that American corporations create jobs here, and not abroad.

8. In today's highly competitive global economy, millions of Americans are unable to afford the higher education they need in order to get good-paying jobs. Further, with both parents now often at work, most working-class families can't locate the high-quality and affordable child care they need for their kids. Quality education in America, from child care to higher education, must be affordable for all. Without a high-quality and affordable educational system, we will be unable to compete globally and our standard of living will continue to decline.

9. The function of banking is to facilitate the flow of capital into productive and job-creating activities. Financial institutions cannot be an island unto themselves, standing as huge profit centers outside of the real economy. Today, six huge Wall Street financial institutions have assets equivalent to 61 percent of our gross domestic product - over $9.8 trillion. These institutions underwrite more than half the mortgages in this country and more than two-thirds of the credit cards. The greed, recklessness and illegal behavior of major Wall Street firms plunged this country into the worst financial crisis since the 1930s. They are too powerful to be reformed. They must be broken up.

10. The United States must join the rest of the industrialized world and recognize that health care is a right of all, and not a privilege. Despite the fact that more than 40 million Americans have no health insurance, we spend almost twice as much per capita on health care as any other nation. We need to establish a Medicare-for-all, single-payer system.

11. Millions of seniors live in poverty and we have the highest rate of childhood poverty of any major country. We must strengthen the social safety net, not weaken it. Instead of cutting Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and nutrition programs, we should be expanding these programs.

12. At a time of massive wealth and income inequality, we need a progressive tax system in this country which is based on ability to pay. It is not acceptable that major profitable corporations have paid nothing in federal income taxes, and that corporate CEOs in this country often enjoy an effective tax rate which is lower than their secretaries. It is absurd that we lose over $100 billion a year in revenue because corporations and the wealthy stash their cash in offshore tax havens around the world. The time is long overdue for real tax reform.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The Cleveland Cops Who Fired 137 Shots and Cried Victim Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=28850"><span class="small">Michael Daly, The Daily Beast</span></a>   
Wednesday, 03 December 2014 13:15

Daly writes: "Nine of the 13 Cleveland cops who fired 137 shots at two apparently unarmed black civilians following a high-speed chase in 2012 have filed a federal lawsuit saying they are victims of racial discrimination. Really."

A police chase in Cleveland ended like the last scene of the movie
A police chase in Cleveland ended like the last scene of the movie "Bonnie and Clyde." (photo: Marvin Fong/The Plain Dealer/Landov)


ALSO SEE: Rialto, Ca. Cops Wear Cameras: Complaints Down 88 Percent, Instances of Force Down 60 Percent

The Cleveland Cops Who Fired 137 Shots and Cried Victim

By Michael Daly, The Daily Beast

03 December 14

 

They unleashed a hail of bullets to rival the final scene in ‘Bonnie and Clyde.’ But the man and women killed in 2012 were unarmed—and now these cops are claiming racial discrimination.

ine of the 13 Cleveland cops who fired 137 shots at two apparently unarmed black civilians following a high-speed chase in 2012 have filed a federal lawsuit saying they are victims of racial discrimination.

Really.

Eight of the aggrieved cops are white. The ninth is Hispanic. They charge that the city of Cleveland has “a history of treating non-African American officers involved in the shootings of African Americans substantially harsher than African-American officers.”

As if their race was the deciding factor in the cops being kept on restricted duty for 16 months after a backfire mistaken for a gunshot and an ensuing cross-town chase led to police firing nearly as many shots at the unarmed Melissa Williams and Timothy Russell as were unleashed upon Bonnie and Clyde in their famous final shootout—leaving Melissa with 24 gunshot wounds to Bonnie’s 23 and Timothy with 23 to Clyde’s 25.

Replay the last scene of the movie Bonnie and Clyde in your mind, only replace the decidedly armed and deadly pair with a homeless duo armed with nothing in the car besides a couple of crack pipes and an empty Coca-Cola can.

The Cleveland Nine should count themselves lucky that they were returned to full duty after 16 months.

Just imagine if one of them had been the cop who fatally shot a black 12-year-old named Tamir Rice after he flashed a realistic looking toy gun in a Cleveland park late last month.

There is already a damning common denominator between the two shootings: the Cleveland police department itself.

After the 2012 shooting, an investigation by the Ohio Attorney General’s Office found the department far more to blame than the individual cops.

And some of the same failures in communication and tactics seem to have played a major role in the more recent tragedy involving young Tamir.

In announcing the results of his investigation into the 2012 deaths, Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine did make clear that no report would have been necessary if Russell had not sped wildly away from police in his 1979 Malibu with Williams at his side, reaching speeds in excess of 100 miles per hour. Russell had been pulled over for the most minor of traffic violations by a cop who had a hunch that he and Williams had been buying drugs.

“To state the obvious, the chase would have ended without tragic results if Timothy Russell had simply stopped the car in response to the police pursuit,” DeWine said as he released the report in February 2013. “Perhaps the alcohol and cocaine in his system impaired his judgment. We will never know.”

DeWine went on: “We do know that each officer at the scene believed he or she was dealing with a driver who had fled law enforcement. They each also believed they were dealing with a passenger who was brandishing a gun—and that the gun had been fired at a police officer. It is now clear that those last two beliefs were likely not true.”

He said something that applies to cops of whatever race in whatever jurisdiction.

“Police officers have a very difficult job. They must make life and death decisions in a split second based on whatever information they have in that moment. But when you have an emergency, like what happened that night, the system has to be strong enough to override subjective decisions made by individuals who are under that extreme stress.”

He continued: “Policy, training, communications, and command have to be so strong and so ingrained to prevent subjective judgment from spiraling out of control. The system has to take over and put on the brakes.”

As it was, the chase was accompanied and spurred on by apparently erroneous radio reports of the occupants firing and reloading a gun. And it all culminated in a middle-school parking lot with the cops mistaking gunfire from other cops as coming from inside the suspect’s car and blazing away as if they had encountered a modern day Bonnie and Clyde rather than just unarmed Melissa and Timothy.

“We are dealing with a systematic failure in the Cleveland Police Department,” DeWine concluded. “Command failed. Communications failed. The system failed.”

After such an indictment, you would expect the department to do all it could to remedy such failings. And that should have prominently included communications. A test came with a phone call to 911 on Nov. 22.

Dispatcher: “Cleveland Police…”

Caller: “Hey, how are you?”

Dispatcher: “Good.”

Caller: “I’m sitting in the park… by the West Boulevard rapid transit station and there’s a guy and like a pistol, you know. It’s probably fake, but he’s like pointing it at everybody.”

Dispatcher: “And where are you at, sir?”

Caller: “I’m sitting in the park at West Cudell, West Boulevard by the West Boulevard rapid transit station.”

Dispatcher: “So, you’re at the rapid station. Are you are the rapid station?”

Caller: “No, I’m sitting across the street at the park.”

Dispatcher: “What’s the name of the park, Cudell?”

Caller: “Cudell, yes. The guy keeps pulling it in and out of his pan… it’s probably fake, but you know what, he’s scaring…

Dispatcher: “What does he look like?”

Caller: “He has a camouflage hat on.”

Dispatcher: “Is he black or white?”

Caller: “He has a gray, gray coat with black sleeves and gray pants on.”

Dispatcher: “Is he black or white?”

Caller: “I’m sorry?”

Dispatcher: “Is he black or white?”

Caller: “He’s black.”

Dispatcher: “He’s got a camo jacket and gray pants?

Caller: “No, he has a camo hat on. You know what that is?...”

Dispatcher: “Yeah.”

Caller: “…Desert storm. And his jacket is gray and it’s got black sleeves on it. He’s sitting on the swing right now. He’s pulling it out of his pants and pointing it at people. He’s probably a juvenile, you know?”

Silence.

Caller: “Hello?”

Dispatcher: “Do you have a gun?”

Caller: “No, I do no not. I’m getting ready to leave, but you know what, he’s right nearby, you know, the youth center or whatever and he’s pulling it in and out of his pants. I don’t know if it’s real or not.”

Dispatcher: “OK, we’ll send a car there, thank you.”

Caller: “Thank you.”

A car was indeed dispatched, with no mention that the suspect was possibly a juvenile and that the gun might be a toy.

Dispatcher: "In the park by the youth center, there’s a black male sitting on the swings. He’s wearing a camouflage hat, a gray jacket with black sleeves. He keeps pulling a gun out of his pants and pointing it at people.”

A surveillance video shows the radio car driving directly into the park, just feet from the youngster. A white rookie cop named Timothy Loehmann was in the passenger seat and police would later insist that he repeatedly instructed Tamir Rice through the lowered window to raise his hands.

If that is so, Loehmann must have been shouting that even as the car was rolling up, for two seconds pass before the startled Tamir is fatally shot. The police say he reached for the gun in his waistband.

And if that is so, Tamir may have been trying to show the cops his gun was just a toy, though there seems not to have been time even for that. He more likely was just moving reflexively as a youngster might if a radio car suddenly materialized right before him in the park, with a cop in the window shouting something a stunned young brain might not immediately register.

Whatever exactly transpired, the Cleveland Police Department had not learned some important lessons from the 2012 shooting about imagined danger and restraint.

However the department deals with Loehmann is not likely to be directly determined by his race any more than race directly determined how the department dealt with the aggrieved nine who have filed the lawsuit.

Race becomes a big factor when the press and the public go generic; white cops and black victims with little attention paid to the details and the individuals and the circumstances. The department responds as press becomes pressure.

In their lawsuit, the Cleveland Nine say an unnamed black cop received only “the 45-day cooling off period” of restricted duty in the gym after shooting a black suspect.

Had the media made an issue of the shooting, you can be all but certain that the cop in question would not have just done a little “gym time,” no matter what his race.

One white cop who is not part of the suit is Michael Brelo, who somehow fired 49 of the 137 bullets unleashed in 2012, reloading twice. He faces manslaughter charges and is now awaiting trial. The city of Cleveland recently reached a $3 million settlement with the Russell and Williams families.

On Saturday, relatives returned to the middle-school parking lot where Russell and Williams were killed and gathered with the family of Tamir Rice. Highway safety flares provided light as the clans joined by loss sought solace in prayer and song.

A report by the Cleveland Plain Dealer describes balloons being released into the night sky. Williams’s uncle, Walter Jackson, spoke to Tamir’s grandfather, J.J. Rice.

“You’re at the start, where we were two years ago,” the uncle said.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
'You Will Not Be Arrested for Using Drugs': What a Sane Drug Policy Looks Like Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=33625"><span class="small">Christopher Ingraham, The Washington Post</span></a>   
Wednesday, 03 December 2014 13:06

"The campaign is striking because you'd never see one like it in the U.S.: 'You will not be arrested for using drugs in Amsterdam,' the fliers promise. Instead, they give information on how to receive medical assistance and how to keep potential overdose victims alert while waiting for help."

Man cultivates marijuana crops. (photo: UPI)
Man cultivates marijuana crops. (photo: UPI)


'You Will Not Be Arrested for Using Drugs': What a Sane Drug Policy Looks Like

By Christopher Ingraham, The Washington Post

03 December 14

 

uthorities in the Netherlands are warning Amsterdam tourists about heroin masquerading as cocaine, which has already killed several people and sent a number of others to the hospital. The campaign is striking because you'd never see one like it in the U.S.: "You will not be arrested for using drugs in Amsterdam," the fliers promise. Instead, they give information on how to receive medical assistance and how to keep potential overdose victims alert while waiting for help.

Dutch law distinguishes between "soft drugs," like marijuana, and "hard" ones, like cocaine and heroin. Possession and use of up to 5 grams of marijuana, and 1 gram of cocaine or heroin, is not subject to penalty. In sharp contrast to the U.S., where drug use has primarily been dealt with as a criminal justice issue (although there's some evidence this is changing), the Dutch approach emphasizes harm reduction and public health.

One of the drawbacks of a criminal justice approach is that the threat of harsh sentencing keeps many drug users from seeking medical assistance in the event of an overdose. That's not a concern in the Netherlands. The Dutch approach allows authorities to have a frank dialogue with drug users when new dangers arise, like the fake cocaine.

The destigmatization of drug use in the Netherlands also plays a big role in this. Drug users there aren't thought of as criminals, as in the U.S., but rather as normal people engaging in unhealthy behavior. There's a notable lack of moral judgment in the language used in the Amsterdam cocaine warnings -- contrast this with the rhetoric employed by many of the opponents of drug law liberalization in the U.S.

Some final food for thought: 44 percent of Americans report having used marijuana in their lifetimes, and 14 percent have used cocaine. In the Netherlands, those numbers stand at 26 percent and 5 percent, respectively.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 2631 2632 2633 2634 2635 2636 2637 2638 2639 2640 Next > End >>

Page 2632 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN