RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
America Is Criminalizing Black Teachers: Atlanta's Cheating Scandal and the Racist Underbelly of Education Reform Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=26467"><span class="small">Brittney Cooper, Salon</span></a>   
Wednesday, 15 April 2015 08:14

Cooper writes: "Last week, an Atlanta jury convicted 11 teachers and school administrators of racketeering in a system-wide cheating scandal."

Former Atlanta Public Schools research team director Tamara Cotman is led to a holding cell after a jury found her guilty in the APS test-cheating trial. (photo: Kent D. Johnson/AP)
Former Atlanta Public Schools research team director Tamara Cotman is led to a holding cell after a jury found her guilty in the APS test-cheating trial. (photo: Kent D. Johnson/AP)


America Is Criminalizing Black Teachers: Atlanta's Cheating Scandal and the Racist Underbelly of Education Reform

By Brittney Cooper, Salon

15 April 15

 

ALSO SEE: Prison for 9 of 10 Former Teachers in Atlanta Test-Cheating Case

Our educational system stacks the deck against Black children -- now we're throwing their teachers in jail

ast week, an Atlanta jury convicted 11 teachers and school administrators of racketeering in a system-wide cheating scandal. Yes, you read that correctly. Teachers and administrators inflating student scores on standardized tests is now considered “organized crime” in this country, and is punishable by more 20 years in prison, in these cases.

I am an educator. I am a Black woman who may someday mother a Black child. I have taught other Black mothers’ children. Much of my educational success in elementary school is directly attributable to high performance on standardized tests that caused my white teachers to notice me and intervene on my behalf to get me “tracked” into higher-achieving classrooms. I believe all children deserve access to a good, high-quality, public education.

Therefore, I don’t have to condone cheating in any form (and I don’t) to assert that what has happened in Atlanta to these teachers is a travesty. The pictures that emerged last week of handcuffed Black schoolteachers being led out of Southern courtrooms in one of the country’s largest urban Black school systems were absolutely heartbreaking.

Scapegoating Black teachers for failing in a system that is designed for Black children, in particular, not to succeed is the real corruption here. Since the early 1990s, we have watched the deprofessionalization of teaching, achieved through the proliferation of “teacher fellow” programs and the massive conservative-led effort to defund public education in major urban areas throughout the country. There is no longer a consensus that a good public education — a hallmark of American democracy — should be considered a public good.

Black children have for generations been the primary victims of this continuing social mendacity about the national value of education. More than 51 percent of children who attend public schools live in poverty. In Georgia, the percentage of Black children living in poverty hovers right around 39 percent. For Latino children, the number is consistently over 40 percent. Nationally, the number for Black children is 39 percent, according to most recent data, and 33 percent for Eighty percent of children in Atlanta Public Schools are Black. Eleven percent are white and 3 percent are Latino. However, only 50 percent of children in Atlanta’s Gifted and Talented programs are Black, whereas 40 percent are white. More disturbingly, 98 percent of all students expelled from Atlanta public schools during the 2009-2010 academic school year were Black.

These numbers taken together paint an abysmal picture of students who are disproportionately poor, over-disciplined, and systematically “tracked” out of high-performing classrooms. And yet we expect teachers to work magic in conditions that are set up for failure.

Lest you think this is merely an Atlanta problem, over at the Crunk Feminist Collective, Susana Morris tells a similar story of attending a predominantly Black high school in Florida with advanced classes that were overwhelmingly white.

Her story mirrors my own. In Louisiana in the 1980s and 1990s, students took two standardized tests. One (the LEAP test) measured basic proficiency and the other (the California Achievement Test) measured more advanced proficiencies. In the third grade, I scored 100 percent on the LEAP test, the only student in my overwhelmingly white class to do so. The teacher Mrs. Callender called me up to the front of the room and bragged about me to all the other students. That same year, on the CAT Test, I scored in the 89 percent percentile.

Meanwhile, I noticed one day during class that several of my white classmates, among them my best friend Amanda, were all mysteriously led out of class and then returned later, with no explanation. When I asked Amanda where she’d been, she said school officials had made her take a test, but she wasn’t clear what for. She never mentioned it again.

The next year, fourth grade, I walked into a classroom and met Beatrice Gaulden, one of only three Black academic teachers I would ever have. With her neon green and yellow Hammer-pants, her penchant for drinking eight tall glasses of water a day, and her strict instructions each morning  – we were not to approach her desk, but rather to wait until she moved to a stool in the front of the room for open discussion time — she was a wonder. Mrs. Gaulden is a character in most of my childhood stories of transformation because she was so pivotal to my own sense of self-worth as an outspoken, bossy, loquacious, bespectacled, ponytailed Black girl in a predominantly white classroom.

Because of Mrs. Gaulden’s instruction, my test scores leaped from the 89th percentile to the 99th percentile within one year of instruction. She never taught to the test. She simply taught.

That year, the Louisiana Gifted and Talented Program came calling for me, as they had called for my friends the year before. I took the battery of tests they offered, no doubt because Mrs. Gaulden had asked them to look at my case. They came back to her (she would tell me years later) and told her that I had not passed the tests. She implored them to rescore my assessment. They came back to her and reported an error in their scoring. (As if.) And so I became a “gifted and talented” student, with even smaller classes, more specialized instruction, early opportunities to take the ACT and SAT, and to travel. I soared with the additional resources provided by the G/T program.

But my educational access was due to one magical Black teacher who saw a spark in me and nurtured it. Mrs. Gaulden nurtured, taught and challenged all her students regardless of race, but she saw in me a Black girl who needed extra guidance, and a little push, and she willingly gave it.

Over the past generation, we have watched the GOP, helped along by an impotent Democratic Party, systematically dismantle funding for public education, underpay teachers, and allow local school systems to institute punitive disciplinary measures that have turned our schools into a prison pipeline. At exactly the same moment, these reformers and their political counterparts George W. Bush (No Child Left Behind) and Barack Obama (Race to the Top) have instituted high-stakes testing, tied to financial incentives for teachers, as the solution to the structural risks overwhelmingly facing children of color.

Meanwhile, test-cheating scandals have proliferated in locales across the country. In other urban locales like Baltimore, Houston and Philadelphia principals and teachers were fired and/or stripped of their licenses to teach. This is a punishment that fits the crime.

Then there’s Michelle Rhee, the famed former chancellor of D.C. Public Schools who was accused of creating the very same culture of fear about test scores that Superintendent Beverly Hall has been accused of creating in Atlanta. Hall was charged with racketeering. So why was Rhee not subject to prosecution when test-score irregularities emerged in the District? (Bruce Dixon was already asking as much two years ago over at Black Agenda Report.) Not only has Rhee not been prosecuted, but she maintains a fairly high level of bipartisan support from conservatives and political centrists for her views on education reform.

Hall’s trial was indefinitely postponed last year due to stage IV breast cancer. She died last month at 68 years old.

Locking up Black women under the guise of caring about Black children is an unbelievable move in an educational environment that systematically denies both care and opportunity to Black children. Locking up Black women for racketeering when the system couldn’t be bothered to lock up even one of the bankers who gave disproportionate amounts of terrible home loans to Black women leading to a national economic crash and a disproportionate amount of home foreclosures among Black women in 2008 is patently unjust.

Given that public schools are largely funded through property taxes and that Black children are overwhelming reared by Black single mothers, the failure to vigorously prosecute the financial institutions and lenders that gutted Black neighborhoods means that the system co-signed corporate acts of institutional violence against Black mothers and children, and against neighborhood schools in Black communities.

But now we are expected to believe that prosecuting these teachers as racketeers is an act of justice. Nothing is just about making Black women sacrificial lambs of an educational system hellbent on throwing Black children away. The images of their handcuffed Black bodies being led in shame from the courtroom gives Black parents angry about the miseducation of their children a convenient target for their angst and outrage over a failing system. Meanwhile, the real racket – privatization and defunding of public schools, diversion of taxpayer resources away from education, and increasing political clout and payouts for school reformers proselytizing the false gospel of high stakes testing – gets obscured. And white children still get educated well, either in private schools or in suburban schools funded through a solid property tax base.

Everything I am today, I owe to my mother and to a Black teacher who saw a spark in me and nurtured it. For so many exceptionally achieving Black people, a providential encounter with a Black teacher is the singular thing that made the difference. No other group of people systematically and structurally love and care about Black children more than Black mothers and Black (usually female) teachers. They have been the ones holding aloft the banner emblazoned with the revolutionary idea that Black Lives Matter, before it was ever a slogan upon which to build a movement. An attack on Black teachers is an attack on Black children, Black families, and Black communities. We should stand in solidarity with these teachers and these students and say, “Not on our watch.”

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Five Myths About Fast-Food Work Print
Wednesday, 15 April 2015 08:11

Chen writes: "Since fast-food workers started walking off the job in New York more than two years ago, their campaign has grown into a worldwide movement."

Emily Abell works at Hardee’s restaurant in Creston, Iowa. (photo: Matt McClain/WP)
Emily Abell works at Hardee's restaurant in Creston, Iowa. (photo: Matt McClain/WP)


Five Myths About Fast-Food Work

By Michelle Chen, The Washington Post

15 April 15

 

ALSO SEE: Fight for $15 Goes Global: Workers Set to Launch Worldwide Protest

ince fast-food workers started walking off the job in New York more than two years ago, their campaign has grown into a worldwide movement. Demanding $15 per hour and a union, workers in fast food and other low-wage industries have staged strikes, rallies and a media campaign to make their case about the difficulties of minimum-wage work. As the Fight for $15 movement plans a massive day of action for April 15, here are five myths about fast-food work.

  1. Fast-food workers are mostly teenagers working for pocket money.

    Fast food was indeed an adolescent gig in the 1950s and 1960s, when the paper hat symbolized the classic short-term, entry-level job. But today, despite arguments that these low-wage jobs are largely filled by “suburban teenagers,” as the Heritage Foundation put it, labor data shows that about 70 percent of the fast-food workforce is at least 20 years old. The typical burger-flipper is an independent adult of about 29, with a high school diploma. Nearly a third have some college experience, and many are single parents raising families on $9 an hour. In contrast to McDonald’s rather optimistic model budget — which assumes that an employee lives in a two-income household and doesn’t need child care or gas or groceries — a large portion of fast-food workers are forced to borrow from friends to cover basic household expenses, or sometimes fall into homelessness.

    According to researchers at the University of California at Berkeley, about half of the families of front-line fast-food workers depend on public programs, compared with 25 percent of the American workforce. About 87 percent of fast-food workers lack employer health benefits, compared with 40 percent of the general workforce. And roughly one-fifth of workers’ families are below the poverty line. That adds up to some $7 billion in welfare payouts each year — essentially enabling fast-food mega-chains to subsidize ultra-low wages with public benefits.

  2. Employees can work their way up and eventually even own a franchise.

    Burger King’s career Web site proclaims: “You’ll never be short of opportunities to show what you’ve got. And if we like what we see, there’s no limit to how far you could go here.” The New York Restaurant Association boasts that restaurant work “creates an opportunity for people to live the American dream.” Under its franchise “success stories,” McDonald’s features a man who advanced from being a crew member to owning a franchise in just a few years.

    The dream of upward mobility, however, eludes most workers. The National Employment Law Project (NELP) points out that about 90 percent of the fast-food workforce is made up of “front-line workers” such as line cooks and cashiers. About 9 percent are lower-level supervisors, who earn about $13 an hour. And just 2.2 percent of fast-food jobs are “managerial, professional, and technical occupations,” compared with 31 percent of jobs in the U.S. economy.

    As for the notion of working your way up to ownership, NELP reports that 1 percent of the fast-food workforce owns a franchise — a purchase that could require $750,000 to several million dollars in financial assets. And there’s no indication that many of these franchisees actually did “rise through the ranks” to become owners, which requires an amount of capital that might top the lifetime salary of an average kitchen worker.

  3. Fast-food companies can’t control franchise wages or working conditions.

    McDonald’s plan to raise wages at least $1 over the local minimum wage was announced this month to much fanfare. But the raise applies only to employees of the 1,500 stores McDonald’s owns directly. The company contends that as a chain franchisor, it merely licenses its brand to individual franchise operators; is not legally liable as an employer; and thus “does not direct or co-determine the hiring, termination, wages, hours” and other working conditions for all who toil under the golden arches.

    But critics say these fast-food chains actually exert powerful oversight over their franchisees by closely tracking their spending and operations. Domino’s, one franchisee claims, critiqued how his employees answered the phone; Burger King franchisees sued the chain in 2009, claiming that it was forcing them to sell menu items for a loss at $1. Companies often pressure owner-operators to squeeze down labor costs: According to one employee quoted in the Guardian, “McDonald’s corporate representatives turn up at the restaurant where he works five or six times a year, counting the number of cars using the drive-through service, timing sales, making sure staff are preparing food according to McDonald’s specifications.” More so than most fast-food chains, McDonald’s wields financial control over its franchisees and owns the rental real estate of the restaurants.

    Former McDonald’s executive Richard Adams has said: “McDonald’s franchisees are pretty compliant. They don’t really organize, they don’t really protest. And if you do, they tell you you’re not a good member of the McFamily. I don’t want to make this seem too Orwellian, but the average franchisee has about six restaurants, and the franchise agreement is for 20 years. You’re probably going to have a renewal coming up. If you’re not a compliant member of the team, you’re probably not going to get that renewal.”

    The issue of whether McDonald’s can be labeled a “joint employer” is being litigated in numerous claims of unfair labor practices that workers have filed with the National Labor Relations Board. The NLRB’s general counsel recently deemed McDonald’s a joint employer, and if it is ultimately penalized as such, workers could see a dramatic expansion in the company’s legal and regulatory obligations.

  4. Flipping burgers is an easy job.

    Some people chafe at the idea of “unskilled” fast-food workers meriting a wage more suited to a “high-skilled” job. Not only does this ignore the fact that this work requires skills — from managing inventory to training and supervising other employees — it also disregards the day-to-day challenges workers navigate on the job. According to a slew of complaints filed with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, workers often suffer injuries such as hot-oil burns and are sometimes denied proper medical care. (Some are told to dress wounds with condiments.) Violence is also common at fast-food restaurants; according to a recent survey, roughly one in eight workers reported being assaulted at work in the past year.

    Workers have also complained of racial discrimination, sexual harassment and retaliatory punishment by management. More than 40 of the NLRB claims filed against McDonald’s in the past few years alleged illegal firings or penalties because of workers’ engagement in labor activism. Add to all of this the challenge of just getting paid: Subway was found guilty of 17,000 separate wage and hour violations since 2000, and in 2013, Taco Bell was hit with a $2.5 million settlement in a class-action lawsuit over unpaid overtime.

  5. Paying workers $15 an hour would make burgers prohibitively costly and hurt the industry.

    Some analysts, particularly on the right, have laid out doomsday scenarios of massive economic disruption caused by a sudden doubling of wages in the fast-food industry. The Heritage Foundation argues that raising wages to $15 an hour could lead to a price spike, shrinking job opportunities, and huge drops in sales and profits . In reality, any such wage increase would probably be incremental and could be absorbed in large part by lowering the fees collected by parent companies from franchisees. Fast-food workers already enjoy such higher pay in other countries with strong labor regulation and union representation. A Big Mac in New Zealand costs less than one in the United States — $4.49 vs. $4.79, according to the Economist’s Big Mac index — and it’ll likely be served by a full-time union worker earning about $12 per hour.

    Higher wages might also bring business benefits, in the form of lower turnover and good press. The Michigan-based fast-casual restaurant Moo Cluck Moo offers a $15 wage alongside premium grass-fed burgers, turning its reputation as a socially responsible employer into a selling point. The market for super-cheap fast food is apparently declining. Consumers just might be hungry for a more conscientious business model.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Militarization of Police Is Not Just Dangerous - It's Wasteful Too, Study Finds Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=34512"><span class="small">Ken Klippenstein, Reader Supported News </span></a>   
Tuesday, 14 April 2015 13:35

Klippenstein writes: "Texas police obtained, free of cost, a 'used' Humvee combat vehicle - with just 32 miles on the odometer. Ohio State University acquired a 38,000 lb. mine-resistant vehicle. These are just a couple of the bizarre acquisitions made possible by a controversial set of programs that has transferred billions of dollars worth of U.S. military equipment to local law enforcement."

In retaliation for thrown bottles, police fire tear gas at crowds gathered near the QuikTrip in Ferguson, Missouri. (photo: David Carson/Polaris/eyevine)
In retaliation for thrown bottles, police fire tear gas at crowds gathered near the QuikTrip in Ferguson, Missouri. (photo: David Carson/Polaris/eyevine)


Militarization of Police Is Not Just Dangerous - It's Wasteful Too, Study Finds

By Ken Klippenstein, Reader Supported News

14 April 15

 

exas police obtained, free of cost, a “used” Humvee combat vehicle – with just 32 miles on the odometer. Ohio State University acquired a 38,000 lb. mine-resistant vehicle. These are just a couple of the bizarre acquisitions made possible by a controversial set of programs that has transferred billions of dollars worth of U.S. military equipment to local law enforcement.

Under these programs, almost any item available to U.S. Army troops overseas is available for purchase by local law enforcement – with nominal oversight. In fact, in many cases, training for these military-grade armaments is not required, and the purchases themselves take place irrespective of local government’s needs. These findings and more were published in a scathing study by law professor Mark Denbeaux, the director of Seton Hall Law Center for Policy and Research. (That study can be downloaded here.)

With protests erupting in South Carolina over police killing of an unarmed black man, Walter Scott, Denbeaux’s ominous report on police militarization may foreshadow what a response from law enforcement could look like in the future.

RSN reached out to Denbeaux for comment. When asked what kind of transparency is in place so citizens can know which armaments their local governments possess, Denbeaux said, “The only way you’d know about the local ones is if the local government agencies catalogue it.”

“There is no system. I don’t think towns know whether they have MRAPs [Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles] or anything else. I would be shocked if the citizens of Ferguson had any clue about the armaments the city had.”

The lack of oversight is remarkably evident when it comes to SWAT teams. “There’s a big question about what training it takes to be on a SWAT team. It’s not clear there’s any,” Denbeaux said.

“The real problem here is massive amounts of weapons and no controls. One reason there are no controls is they’re given away basically for free. That’s not literally true, but what they get is so vastly expensive compared to what they pay for it – and in a time when there’s all this fear – it’s hard for a town to say no.”

When asked to speculate on why armaments are given to local governments below cost, Denbeaux remarked, “Our defense plan is always to be ready if there’s a war, but if there isn’t a war and you’ve got all the equipment ... you replace the old equipment with the new equipment, and then what do you do with the old equipment? 10 years from now, we’re going to be awash in this kind of weaponry. It’s not just dangerous, it’s also a huge expense.”

“I don’t think most of the stuff even saw the battlefield. I don’t think they’re getting shot-up MRAPs, it’s equipment that the military never used. They order ‘x’ number of MRAPs every year ... but each year there’s an upgrade, so what do they do with the model 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 MRAP?”

“One of the problems is the military has to have some way to get rid of its waste ... One could very cynically believe that this is simply a way to keep the weapons manufacturers going constantly.”

Denbeaux’s cynicism is not unfounded, considering the staggering costs associated with the programs that arm local governments with military equipment. Consider the Defense Logistics Agency’s 1033 program, which has transferred over $4.2 billion worth of military armaments since 1990. Or the 1122 program, which allowed local police to purchase $700 million worth of military equipment in the fiscal year 2011 alone. The modestly titled Community Oriented Policing Service (“COPS”) Hiring Program (“CHP”) shelled out over $240 million in just 2011 alone to state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies.

These are just some of many astonishing examples of wasteful militarization that can be found in Denbaux’s study.


Ken Klippenstein is a staff journalist at Reader Supported News. He can be reached on Twitter @kenklippenstein or email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The Silence on Abuse of Transgender Inmates in US Prisons Is Deafening Print
Tuesday, 14 April 2015 13:11

Excerpt: "Ashley Diamond, a transgender inmate who was denied medically necessary hormones by the Georgia correctional system, was raped seven times, called a 'he-she thing', and thrown into solitary confinement for 'pretending' to be a woman."

Elton John and Michael Stipe. (photo: Dimitrios Kambouris/WireImage)
Elton John and Michael Stipe. (photo: Dimitrios Kambouris/WireImage)


The Silence on Abuse of Transgender Inmates in US Prisons Is Deafening

By Elton John and Michael Stipe, Guardian UK

14 April 15

 

The cruelty and violence facing transgender people in US prisons is connected to the fight for equality for the LGBT community across America

shley Diamond, a transgender inmate who was denied medically necessary hormones by the Georgia correctional system, was raped seven times, called a “he-she thing”, and thrown into solitary confinement for “pretending” to be a woman.

Last week, the United States Justice Department weighed in on her lawsuit and found that Georgia’s “freeze-frame” policy – which denied trans inmates the chance to begin or expand hormone treatment in prison – constituted “cruel and unusual punishment” and violated the United States Constitution.

This horrific treatment illustrates the broader policy changes we desperately need to ensure that no one in a correction setting - or any setting, for that matter - is denied their human or civil rights because of their gender identity or sexual orientation.

Today, transgender women in male prisons are 13 times more likely than the general prison population to be sexually assaulted while incarcerated. Nearly two-thirds of trans inmates report sexual assault. And more often than not, assaults go unreported in part because the perpetrators are prison guards, wardens and staff.

This is a disgrace.

Sadly, it’s not the first time we’ve heard of prisoners being mistreated because of their sexual orientation. Until recently, HIV-positive prisoners in South Carolina who were convicted for minor offenses were segregated and held alongside inmates on death row. The Elton John AIDS Foundation was proud to support the ACLU’s legal action that ended this despicable policy.

The silence from Georgia prison officials on transgender abuse is deafening. A new policy that initiates individualized assessments of gender dysphoria will improve medical care for trans people, but it does nothing for the verbal and physical abuse that women like Ashley Diamond regularly face in correctional facilities.

The Justice Department was right to take a stand in favor of the rights of transgender prisoners to medical hormone treatment. Now, it’s time for the DOJ to take a stand against the brutality and sexual assault that transgender prisoners face in our correctional facilities.

There is a troubling lack of awareness in correctional facilities about the nuances of gender identity and the well-being of trans women inmates in male prisons. Too often, prisons chip away at the very identity of these women by using male pronouns, confiscating their bras and – as in Ashley’s case – denying medically necessary hormone therapy (she’d been undergoing hers for nearly 20 years). We must understand the effects these practices have and put a stop to them.

All too often, transgender people are stripped of their dignity before they even step foot in prison. They are subject to discrimination, harassment and violence – leaving many in poverty, homelessness and without access to adequate healthcare. If we are going to raise awareness about issues facing transgender women inside prison, we must work in parallel by addressing these issues in our communities. As Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. once said: “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere”.

The cruelty and violence facing transgender people in our prisons is directly connected to the larger fight for equality for the LGBT community everywhere in America. To be sure, the despicably violent and discriminatory treatment of transgender prisoners must end. But so too must the broader violations of human dignity – behind bars and beyond them.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS | It's Game On for Hillary and the Democrats Print
Tuesday, 14 April 2015 11:28

Galindez writes: "Hillary Clinton officially entered the race for the Democratic Nomination for president."

Hillary Clinton. (photo: Getty Images)
Hillary Clinton. (photo: Getty Images)


It's Game On for Hillary and the Democrats

By Scott Galindez, Reader Supported News

14 April 15

 

illary Clinton officially entered the race for the Democratic nomination for president. Clinton announced her candidacy in a tweet on Sunday that included a link to a prepared video. Her message was upbeat, focusing on preparing for new challenges. In the video, “everyday Americans” spoke of the changes in their lives and then Hillary appeared, saying she is “getting ready for something too, I’m running for President.” Clinton went on to say that “Americans have fought their way back from tough economic times, but the deck is still stacked in favor of those at the top.” She argued for an economy where “you can do more than just get by – you can get ahead and stay ahead, because when families are strong, America is strong.”

In a press release, her campaign announced what they call a ramping-up period: “Just like the families in her video who are getting ready for fresh starts, Hillary is preparing her campaign organization. She’s committed to spending the next 6 to 8 weeks in a ‘ramp up’ period where her team will start to build a nation-wide grassroots organization, and she will spend her time engaging directly with voters.”

“In May, once her supporters in all 50 states are organized for house parties or to watch over live-streams, Hillary will hold her first rally and deliver the speech to kick off her campaign,” according to the press release. The former secretary of state will arrive in Iowa on Tuesday. During a two-day swing through Iowa, Clinton will join roundtables of students, educators and members of the small business community. In addition, the trip will include meetings with elected officials, community leaders, activists, and other Iowans from across the state to discuss her campaign and ask for their support.

In her announcement video, Hillary urged people to get involved in the cause, saying, “It’s your time. I hope you’ll join me on this journey.”

Four others are actively considering jumping in, along with one Independent. Former Virginia senator Jim Webb, former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley, and former Rhode Island senator Lincoln Chafee are thinking about running, and then there’s the new McGovern, Vice President Joe Biden, getting ready for round three. Senator Bernie Sanders, an Independent from Vermont, is considering running as a Democrat. Many are still trying to encourage Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren to jump in. Staff and volunteers of Run Warren Run in Des Moines welcomed Hillary to Iowa and encouraged Elizabeth Warren to join her. A volunteer read a statement from MoveOn within minutes of Clinton’s announcement.

Martin O’Malley and Jim Webb were already in Iowa and made their case to Polk County Democrats on Friday night in Des Moines. The common theme of the night was restoring the American dream.

Webb delivered a low-key address in which he pledged a “return to the party of Roosevelt and Truman, a prudent party that truly looks after everyone that lacks a voice.” Webb was awarded the Navy Cross, the second highest decoration in the Navy and Marine Corps, for heroism in Vietnam. Webb also was awarded the Silver Star, two Bronze Stars, and two Purple Hearts. Webb has also served as secretary of the Navy and assistant secretary of defense.

O’Malley was better at articulating his message, courting the Warren supporters in a fine-tuned speech that received applause often. He had sharpened his attacks on Wall Street and his call to help students afford higher education since I last saw him a couple of weeks ago. He continued his theme of keeping the American dream alive. He connected with the crowd and again shook as many hands as he could. O’Malley understands Iowa and could give Hillary a run for her money.

Following the speeches, I asked O’Malley what his position is on the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP). He was quick to say he opposed it. He spoke of concerns about jobs and said he opposes any deal that he can’t read before voting. It is clear that O’Malley is staking out a position to the left of Clinton, a strategy that may be very effective.

Senator Bernie Sanders issued this statement on Sunday: “Hillary Clinton is an experienced and well-qualified leader who I was pleased to serve with in the Senate. During this campaign, it is imperative that Secretary Clinton, like every other candidate, address the great challenges of our time: the grotesque level of income and wealth inequality that is crushing our middle class; high unemployment and low wages; the threat that global climate change presents to our future and the future of our children; and the fact that democracy itself is at risk because of the catastrophic decision of the Supreme Court in the Citizens United case, which is allowing billionaires to spend unlimited sums to buy the government of United States. I hope that Secretary Clinton will speak out on these and other important issues in the days and weeks ahead.”

Sanders has been traveling the country and is close to a decision on his own candidacy for the presidency.

Most pundits think the race for the Democratic nomination is over, and that Hillary Clinton is the nominee. They forgot to tell Iowa Democrats that. In Iowa and New Hampshire, voters expect to be wooed. They expect to meet the candidates a few times before making up their minds. Even the Polk County chair of the Democratic Party told me he didn’t think the race was over. I hope he is right. A coronation will make for a very boring year.



Scott Galindez attended Syracuse University, where he first became politically active. The writings of El Salvador's slain archbishop Oscar Romero and the on-campus South Africa divestment movement converted him from a Reagan supporter to an activist for Peace and Justice. Over the years he has been influenced by the likes of Philip Berrigan, William Thomas, Mitch Snyder, Don White, Lisa Fithian, and Paul Wellstone. Scott met Marc Ash while organizing counterinaugural events after George W. Bush's first stolen election. Scott will be spending a year covering the presidential election from Iowa.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 2491 2492 2493 2494 2495 2496 2497 2498 2499 2500 Next > End >>

Page 2497 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN