Written by David E.H. Smith   

As a better means of considering solicitations for donations to "opposition" political parties, I just have a couple of simple & the most basic due diligence questions that will help to determine both; the nature and the amount that may be donated.

For instance, what are the "considerations" that the lobbyists' clients are paying to the presidents of the "opposition" parties, in order to influence, &/or, limit the scope of a party's "opposition", and thereby, defining the basis of your constituents "beliefs" (as opposed to their "understanding" of judicial evidence & burdens of “proof”) regarding the available number of alternatives to particular issues that are presented by the governing party, et al?

And, are the presidents of the "opposition" parties receiving any considerations for not sharing with your constituents the information & the simple questions that are embodied in The W.A.D. Accord including the information about:
1) The WAD Accord's "green", clean & sustainable enterprises
and
2) The Compensation to the most vulnerable Native & non Native Canadians for their continuing deprivation of the simplest & most basic information?

Do the voters living in the constituencies that you are presently representing understand that they can use the aforementioned WAD Accord information in order to:
1) exculpate themselves from having to pay any of the aforementioned Compensation (similar to The Compensation to the victims of the Residential Schools, but, much larger),
2) receive punitive damages from those members of corporate Canada, corporate China (see; "C-CI Treaty; NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGE..."*) and corporate European Union (see; CETA; NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGE..."*), et al, as a consequence of;
a) the risks associated with the development (& financing) of the natural resources that are continuing to be found in Canada
&
b) the costs of the penalties & alleged damages paid by the non shareholders of the enterprises generated by the C-CIT (Canada - China Investment Treaty) & the CETA (Canada - European Union Comprehensive Economic & Trade Agreement) (& the TPPartnership) in order to inflate the values of the C-CIT, TPP & the CETA shareholders' shares & dividends
and
3) et al?

Has the governing party, et al, provided you with a copy of The W.A.D. Accord for your consideration, understanding & sharing with the potential "opposition" parties' voters?

Have you requested a copy of The WAD Accord from the federal government, et al?

Or, are you also deliberately depriving the constituents & all Canadians (ie. all potential members of the"opposition" parties) of the information in:
1) The WAD Accord,
2) the aforementioned:
a) "NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGE to the C-CI Treaty"
b) "NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGE to the TPPartnership"
&
c) "NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGE to the CET Agreement"
and
3) et al?

Is the reason for the "opposition" parties' depriving the potential party members of the aforementioned information due to the considerations that you are receiving, &/or, will be receiving (ie. "future" considerations) from the relevant lobbyists' clients who will be the direct (cash) dividend beneficiaries of the C-CI Treaty, the TPP & the CET Agreement, etc.?

On the other hand, how much money, &/or, other considerations do you think is equitable to be paid to the presidents of the "opposition" parties, their parties, their constituents and potential party members in order that an "opposition" party goes along with limiting the amount of the aforementioned information that is provided to constituents in other areas where the "opposition" parties would like to have winning candidates that share the aforementioned information?

And, would you prefer that the aforementioned information be "renditioned" by the dissemination of another country's intelligence service to the aforementioned most vulnerable Native & non Native Canadians, et al, for their humble consideration, etc. and thereby, provide "opposition" parties with politically deniable?

Which countries' intelligence service are knowledgeable about the aforementioned information? What are the various different ways that these countries can use & are using their knowledge of The WAD Accord, the "NOTIFICATIONS of Preexisting CHALLENGES...",etc., in order to get more favorable terms & conditions in the Canada - China Investment Treaty, the Canada - European Union Comprehensive Economic & Trade Agreement, TPP, et al?

Do you now, as a consequence the aforementioned information, understand why Prime Minister Harper, on behalf of corporate Canada, & in particular its Alberta chapter, will continue to demand that the C-CIT, the CETA & the TPP trade resolution tribunals have to be held in secret, ie. to protect & enhance its continuing, lucrative arrangements between the lobbyists' clients & the executives of the political parties that are operating in Canada?

Similarly, after the presidents of the "opposition" parties conduct their due diligence research of the aforementioned information (most of it can be found on line), they might be interested in knowing which Canadian senators are interested in using the information in order to, among other things, prevent the abolition of the Senate and to un handcuff the Senators so they can start conducting their adversarial duties, including their improvements & alternatives to the lower house's legislation, in the manner with which they were intended to be preformed.

By way of closing, please do not think that I am being rude when I say that I am not particularly interested in how a "opposition" party is going to form a government in "the not to distant future" without knowing anything about the aforementioned information. On the contrary, it is because I have read the "opposition's" material that it may be obvious that they do not have the aforementioned information and thus, have no idea how vulnerable that makes the "opposition" parties and their constituents, & thus, all Canadians. Similarly, without the more comprehensive information regarding the enclosed, the "opposition" parties have very little idea how vulnerable the Conservatives the government in power), corporate Canada, et al, are continuing to become as a consequence of the aforementioned information deprivation. I think that the "opposition" parties may be beginning to understand, not only how a particular party can use the aforementioned information to:
1) exculpate the potential voters of the Green Party from having to pay most, &/or, any of The Compensation that is in The WAD Accord
and
2) vastly improve, &/or, reject the aforementioned C-CI Treaty, TPPartnership, CET Agreement et al,
but,
do they understand that it is essential that an "opposition" party does have to use the aforementioned information in order to form the next government?

Therefore, once the "opposition" parties have conducted their research, which should take a couple of days, I would be interested in reading about how they intend to use the information in order:
1) to dramatically increase their party's revenues,
2) to dramatically increase the number of their party's constituencies & members of parliament,
3) to share the information with the harmless, most vulnerable Canadian community members (ie. 95% - 99% of all Canadians) in order that they can make much more informed decisions & choices regarding the economic & political issues that will continue to increase the huge gap between:
a) the exclusive beneficiaries of the aforementioned arrangements (ie. corporate Canada & its shareholders)
and
b) the most vulnerable, information deprived Canadians (ie. the 95% - 99% of Native & non Native Canadians who will also be non shareholders in the enterprises that can be generated by the Treaty, the Partnership, the Agreement, et al)
&
4) et al.

Regardless, I look forward to the "opposition" parties' sharing with me their acknowledgement of their understanding of the aforementioned information in their answers to these simple & most basic questions that I have included in this letter & the enclosed.

Regrettably, in the meantime, the "opposition" parties' lack of information will continue to be a source of delightful embarrassment that the Conservatives, et al, will continue to enjoy as they & corporate Canada march on with their contribution to the global economic arrangements.

For an update on the recent information sharing with the European Union regarding the CETA, et al, see the letter below entitled:

"HUMAN RIGHTS & FINANCIAL NEWS; DEHS
TARGETING 95% - 99% CANADIANS (the Most Vulnerable Native & non Native Canadians & citizens of the EU) by "Unethical & Inhumane" Arrangements between Canadian Lobbyists' Clients/Parties' Executives; EU may consider "Renditioning Info" in CETA CHALLENGE; CHINA Unprotected with C-CIT?"

For more Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human
(Nature) Rights & Economics in the C-CI Treaty, the CET Agreement,
TPP, et al, via The WAD Accord,
see; Facebook; "David Smith, Sidney, BC",
or,
Google; "David E.H. Smith" to access RECENT ARTICLES, LETTERS & NOTIFICATIONS by DEHS.

Sincerely,

David E.H. Smith
- Researcher/ Bach. of Enviro. Studies
- "Qui tam..."

PS - Who do you think is the "coveted" foreign investor who said:

"It's not that we are racist when it comes to dealing with Canadians,
it's just that we can't stand the way that you suck up to us"?

Which Canadians are the "coveted" investor was referring to?

And, how much does the "coveted" investor knows about the enclosed and thus, has been conducting his affairs & those of his associates & shareholders accordingly?

* "NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGE(s) to the TPPartnership","...the C-CI Treaty","...the CETA", (& the TPP) et al.