Written by David E.H. Smith   

HELP President XI JINPING & the "COVETED" Hong Kong investor with the wording of "The REFERENDUM on the COUNTER OFFER to the TERMINATION PLAN for CANADIANS" (Natives & non Natives) to protect Chinese shareholders from paying their "unfair" portion of The WAD Accord's Compensation & protect the billions of Chinese non shareholders from the punitive punishments from "The Star Chambers' Secret Tribunals" in the China - Canada Investment Treaty (C-CIT).
EU (re; CETA), Trans Pacific nations (re; TPP), North America (re; NAFTA) to follow.
***************
GREEN Party of Canada LEAKS
(CAN) - GREEN Party Acknowledges & Understands REFERENDUM on "The COUNTER OFFER to The Termination Plan for Canadians, both; Native & non Native, et al...

Mr. Paul Estrin, president,
& Ms. EMILY McMILLAN, executive director,
of the GREEN PARTY (of Canada), et al;

As a means of achieving a better understanding of your petition re;

"MP Michael Chong introduced the Reform Act 2013, a Private Member’s Bill which -- if passed -- would go a long way to remedy our suffering democratic system"

& thereby, ascertain the amount of our donations for your solicitations,
I would ask you a couple of simple questions & fulfil a couple of simple requirements.
They are;
1) please, acknowledge that you have received this response to your petition,
2) acknowledge that you understand the material (questions & information) in it,
3) check off the handy "Yes", or, "No" to the questions
&
4) after completing the above you may consider trying to improve the letter & answers to the questions in the enclosed article entitled "The COUNTER OFFER to The Termination Plan 'for' Native Canadians, ET AL".

#1) Do you think the Canadian voters think that your aforementioned petition clears you & the Green Party of being under the influence of corporate Canada, et al, which, by way of a strong leader from the Alberta Chapter of corporate Canada, is in the process of fast tracking the arrangements, whereby corporate Canada will get everything that they have ever hoped for in terms of the autonomy, protection, funding, secret tribunals to "reward" its partners with punitive penalties, et al, in The C-CI Treaty, The CET Agreement, The TP Partnership, et al?
Yes ___, or, No ___.

That is to say, that once corporate Canada, et al, has everything that it wants, would it not become necessary for the parties to the arrangements to insist that as a means of "guaranteeing" the protection of their arrangements in the future that they & their partners need to close & to lock the door of protection behind themselves & their aforementioned arrangements by insisting upon weakening the power of all subsequent, political leaders (&, thereby, weakening the Canadian "political" process) that may be strong enough & uninfluenced by corporate Canada to "un ring the bell" & either; improve the aforementioned arrangements, or, eliminate them without the fear of recriminations & render the non shareholding Canadians harmless & without the costs, &/or, the liabilities for terminating the arrangements?
Yes ___, or, No ___.

And, Mr. Estrin, by our Green Party endorsing corporate Canada's doctrine of hoping to "guarantee" that the actions of a strong leader will never happen again, but, only after corporate Canada & its strong leader have legitimized its direct access to the voters' tax dollars & its circumvention of the political process of the "democracy" that is evolving in Canada,
it is an indication that we, the Green Party, are either supporting corporate Canada's arrangements by:
1) a lack of information (that you "just" do not have) (ie. incompetence),
&/or,
2) a deliberate misrepresentation (ie. insincerity) of the information?
Yes ___, or, No ___.

And, while I do understand your desire to engage in a preemptive political argument regarding your beliefs regarding the above & the enclosed, would you first be courteous enough to answer the "Yes", or, "No" questions in the following letter in order that we, et al, can ascertain for ourselves how much you know about the information that is being questioned, & thereby, enable us to get a better understanding of the basis for your beliefs, conclusions, assumptions, etc.?
Yes ___, or, No ___.

And, do you agree that by your not answering the following simple & most basic questions that we, the Green Party, are giving the overwhelming impression to the non shareholding, Canadian voters, et al, that we are afraid of something, such as; political back lash, etc., &/or, we are under the influence of corporate Canada, &/or, other lobbying groups, et al?

For instance, now that I have located & provided you & the Party with a less comprehensive version of The W.A.D. Accord (a.k.a.; The Australian Question) including The Compensation,
do you have a problem saying; I, &/or, we, the Green Party, acknowledge that we have received The WAD Accord?
Yes ___, or, No ___.

Do you have a problem saying; I, &/or, we, the Green Party, understand The WAD Accord & the basis for The Compensation that is in The Accord?
Yes ___, or, No ___.

Do you understand that The Accord can be used by the Green Party in order to:
eliminate the aforementioned arrangements; the C-CI Treaty, the CET Agreement, the TP Partnership, et al,
&/or,
vastly improve the arrangements by removing the costs to the non shareholders of:
1) developing, adjudicating & enforcing the secret trade arrangements & its "dispute" tribunals, et al,
&
2) other liabilities,
and ensuring that corporate Canada & its shareholders, et al, pay for their aforementioned costs & any other liabilities?
Yes ___, or, No ___.

Have you shared with the potential voters of the Green Party, the other potential participants who have suggested that they have an interest in the development (its & financing) of the natural resources that are continuing to be found in Canada, et al,
the aforementioned information about using The WAD Accord to improve, &/or, eliminate the aforementioned arrangements?
Yes ___, or, No ___.

Do you know who are the information deprivers (ie. those who are depriving Canadians, et al, from obtaining the due diligence information, such as; The WAD Accord & its Compensation, for their consideration, discussion, improvements, approval, rejection, et al, without the fear of recriminations)?
Yes ___, or, No ___.

Will you acknowledge your receipt of "The NOTIFICATION of the Preexisting CHALLENGE to the Canada - China Investment Treaty", et al, that I have sent to the President of China, et al, for his humble considerations, improvements, etc., that is enclosed below?
Yes ___, or, No ___.

Do you understand the basis for "The NOTIFICATION of the Preexisting CHALLENGE to the Canada - China Investment Treaty"?
Yes ___, or, No ___.

Will you acknowledge your receipt of "The COUNTER OFFER REFERENDUMS to The Termination Plan for Native Canadians, ET AL"; (Including the Referendums on The WAD Accord, The Notification of C-CI Treaty (& CETA & TPP), The Termination Plan, The T.P. Counter Offer, et al?
Yes ___, or, No ___.

Do you understand "The COUNTER OFFER REFERENDUMS to The Termination Plan for Native Canadians, ET AL"?
Yes ___, or, No ___.

Would you like for me to arrange for you to discuss the above & the enclosed with the non shareholding Canadian voters, the "coveted" Chinese investor & the other participants in the aforementioned arrangements, Treaty, Agreement, Partnership, et al, in order for you & I to, among other things, share the improvements with the other participants?
Yes ___, or, No ___.

By the way, Paul, my name is David E.H. Smith, but, by you & Elizabeth May referring to me as "David E.H.", don't you think that it gives the impression that we are just using a pollster type computer to generate "responses" as opposed to "answers" to the questions that I, et al, have asked you?
Yes ___, or, No ___.
Would it be more convenient for you if you just called me David Smith?
Yes ___, or, No ___.

By way of closing, it is after you have complied with the above due diligence request that we may consider your beliefs regarding the seemingly "desperate" attempt to mollify the public with your "future considerations" in your petition regarding the reduction of the power of Canadian leaders
&
your solicitations for donations, et al.

Sincerely,

David E.H. Smith - Researcher - "Qui tam..."
P.S. - Please be advised that there are several domestic & foreign participants of the aforementioned "arrangements" who I am continuing to share the enclosed information, questions, etc. with, who are "interested" to see if you invoke the following responses:
1) "I'm too over worked & understaffed to let everyone know that I do not want to, &/or, can not answer the questions (or, because I, we, do not want the voters, et al, to know who, or, what organizations we are "beholden to", etc.), but, we may be able, &/or, will be able to find the time to run the/a country if we can do it with a "weak" leader
&/or,
2) I can not answer (ie. "competence") because I do not know & I do not want to know.
And, as a means of further assisting you & our Green Party to save the time & the manpower from having to disseminate your answers to the above & the enclosed due diligence questions (sans votre croyance) with the aforementioned domestic & foreign participants, I'll share your "answers", as opposed to your "responses", with them, et al.
************
NOTE; "CHAIRMAN MAO'S LAST LAUGH?", Prequel to:
Reader Supported News;
The Termination Plan for Native Canadians, et al; The COUNTER OFFER REFERENDUMS; The WAD Accord, The Notification of C-CI Treaty (CETA & TPP), The Termination Plan, The T.P. Counter Offer, et al
Date; Date: 2013-12-15
*************
For more Info. & Questions re; The Relationship between Human (Nature) Rights & Economics in the C-CITreaty, the CETAgreement, et al, via The WAD Accord,
see; Facebook; David Smith, Sidney, BC
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003319183540&fref=ts

How to Submit a Leak to Wikileaks
www.wikihow.com
Wikileaks.org is a site aimed at uncovering government, corporate, and other relevant information that the public has a right to know about but has been kept under wraps. A multi-jurisdictional public service aimed at protecting...