America's Poor: Blaming the Victims
The most common way of assuaging one's guilt is to project that guilt onto the victim, thereby relieving (however temporarily) the uncomfortable feelings associated with that guilt. One of the most basic human drives is to avoid pain, both physical and emotional, and the human brain is well-equipped for self-delusion in order to satisfy that drive. Blaming the victim is one way in which humans accomplish that.
For example, in this country, one of the biggest scapegoats is the poor. Rather than examine the uncomfortable truths surrounding the systemic poverty that permeates our world, many of which reveal our own complicity, we relieve our guilt by blaming the victims. It is much easier to dismiss these people as being morally inferior than it is to acknowledge the corruption, greed, selfishness, and indifference that has caused it.
To make matters worse, these myths about the poor are endlessly perpetuated in the media, which of course is controlled by those very individuals who have contributed so greatly to these conditions, and who derive such great benefit (both psychological and financial) from their perpetuation. As a result, average Americans are led to believe these myths, and because we are trained from a young age to defer to various authorities for the "truth", we assume that because it's on CNN and Fox, that it must be true. Further, often times the victims themselves are conditioned to believe that they are to blame for their circumstances, rather than being victims of institutionalized racism, sexism, and classism.
In reality, over 90% of the "lazy welfare bums" in most states are dependent children of fathers who have abandoned them and the spouses or partners of those same men. In addition, most of those men are not "lazy"; most of them earn enough income to contribute, but they don't. Also, most people who live below the poverty line receive no welfare money at all because they work full-time, but still don't make enough to pay their bills. And most food stamp recipients come from households in which at least one member works full-time, but they still don't make enough money to escape poverty.
The vast majority of people aren't lazy; they want to work and be productive members of society and facilitate happiness and stability for themselves and their families, and most of the ones who don't suffer from alcoholism, mental illness, drug addiction, and other afflictions that have resulted in their being abandoned by society, at least in this country, where the primary social safety net is the prison system. Those who suggest otherwise might examine their own reasons for ascribing such falsely cynical motives to those who have the same basic human needs and desires as themselves.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
ARTICLE VIEWS: 1492
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
|
The history of federal finances and the economy is a superior indicator of reality than the edicts of our politicians in Washington and elsewhere. History since World War II belies the concept that Tuesday, 18 June 2013 |
|
Legal abortions in the US number about 1.2 million per year and that represents a decline and a leveling off at that number. The number one reason women give for an abortion is that a child would Tuesday, 18 June 2013 |
|
Gun rights are guaranteed by the Second Amendment while gun wrongs are guaranteed by the NRA. 30,000+ Americans die every year while far fewer die annually by acts of terrorism and our wars against Monday, 17 June 2013 |
|
Though the USA loudly condemns hacking or cyber war, if you like, the USA is by far the number one computer hacker in our world today. The problem is that the USA doesn't want this known so much of Monday, 17 June 2013 |
|
Perhaps the most important event of this week is what did not happen. US Secretary of State John Kerry did not land at Ben Gurion Airport, and did not go by helicopter back and forth between Saturday, 15 June 2013 |
|
Sometimes, the simplest solutions are the best ones. Unfortunately, though, Canada’s extreme concentration of corporate power often precludes the solutions from ever seeing the light of day.The Friday, 14 June 2013 |
|
The term "palindrome" is not a palindrome — since, backwards, it is "emordnilap" (a word that begs the question of what kind of "lap" is "emordni"). Compare true word-palindromes: dad, did, eve, Thursday, 13 June 2013 |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
"There's class warfare, all right, Mr. (Warren) Buffett said, but it's my class, the rich class, that's making war, and we're winning"
"My friends and I have been coddled long enough by a billionaire-fri endly Congress." - Billionaire Warren Buffett, in a New York Times op-ed on Aug. 15.
There has been class warfare going on," Buffett, 81, said in a Sept. 30 interview with Charlie Rose on PBS. It's just that my class is winning. And my class isn't just winning, I mean we're killing them."
"While the poor and middle class fight for us in Afghanistan, and while most Americans struggle to make ends meet, we mega-rich continue to get our extraordinary tax breaks," Buffett wrote in a Sunday New York Times Op-ed.
:)
When Dwight Eisenhower left office, 22.5% of Americans were in poverty.
When Lyndon Johnson left office after his "War on Poverty" 12% of Americans were in poverty. Richard Nixon went through his term whining about the failure of LBJ's "War" but continued using Great Society programs and adding to them, and the poverty level crept down. Jimmy Carter lowered poverty level to 11.4%.
Then came the conservative revolution in the form of Ronald Reagan. When he and Bush the Daddy left office, poverty was up to 15.1%; a 33% increase.
Bill Clinton lowered poverty to 11.3% only to turn the job over to Buffoon Bush and poverty skyrocketed again; back above 15%.
Conservatives tell us that poverty is the result of people who are lazy, layabouts who would rather take from productive Americans than provide for themselves.
Conservatives should then explain to us why conservative administrations make millions of Americans lazy, unmotivated, leeches on productive Americans while Democratic administrations do just the opposite.
RSS feed for comments to this post