The Grand Canyon, Uranium MIning, and John McCain
Written by David Gowdey
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:44
At a time when Occupy Wall Street is giving tangible voice to the outrage most Americans feel about the corrosive influence corporate money is having on policy in Washington, we’re being treated to another blatant example of how Washington just doesn’t get it.
On October 12, Senator John McCain filed a bill in the Senate, SB 1690, designed to subvert a pending action by Secretary of the Interior Salazar and open up a million acres of public land around the Grand Canyon National Park to uranium mining. This despite the fact that polls repeatedly show that 70% of all Americans and two thirds of Arizonans do NOT want this area open to uranium mining, and that the overwhelming majority of the local tribal, county and city governments in the affected area have asked that it be permanently withdrawn from mineral entry. Once again in Congress corporate money is trumping the expressed will of the public.
An October 13, 2011 editorial in the Prescott Courier, a staunchly conservative newspaper in central Arizona, sums the situation up succinctly: "The effort to mine the proposed 1 million acres near the Grand Canyon is a Republican effort, and the paper trail of campaign contributions reveals why. According to U.S. News and World Report, the mining industry has contributed $3.4 million to Republican congressmen and women since 2009, compared to $900,000 for Democrats. In the Senate alone, the average mining industry contribution is almost $30,000 more per Republican than Democrat. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) is the highest recipient of mining money among Arizona lawmakers, pulling in more than $42,000 in contributions. Rep. Ben Quayle (R-Ariz.) is second with almost $40,000"
The stench is even more obvious when you read the text of SB 1690. Obviously written by the industry – it is remarkable even by Washington standards for its mendacity. It may be the most concentrated collection of outright lies and half truths ever put into a Senate Bill.
The bill claims that uranium mining in breccia pipes is low impact and has low risk of toxic pollution. In fact, the exact opposite is true. The Uranium mining industry is arguably the dirtiest industry in America with an almost perfect record of leaving behind serious problems with water pollution and long term toxic contamination wherever it has operated. It falsely claims that the Wilderness bill of 1984 guaranteed that mining would be permitted on the Arizona strip in perpetuity in return for the creation of a number of wilderness areas in other parts of the state– a guarantee that was not only never made, but could not have been made.
SB 1690 makes the usual specious claims about jobs (the government analysis estimates it would generate less than 100 direct jobs for six to seven years). It also pretends that the ore mined would generate revenues for the US government –although the companies involved are all foreign companies and under the 1872 mining law those who discover valuable minerals on public land do not have to pay any royalties on them. In fact, Uranium mining is almost guaranteed to cost the taxpayers money. It uses inflated USGS estimates of the amount of uranium ore in the entire Arizona Strip as though it were all being put off limits to mining, when in fact more than 800,000 acres that doesn’t directly impact the Grand Canyon remains open to mining.
But the most outrageous thing SB 1690 does is to usurp the authority of the Secretary of the Interior in order to turn the area adjacent to the Grand Canyon, the crown jewel of the National Park system and a world heritage site, into an industrial park. An industrial park that not only threatens the ecosystem of the Grand Canyon and the Colorado River, but also threatens to contaminate the drinking water of 25 million people downstream in California, Arizona and Nevada.
A landmark decision by Secretary of the Interior Salazar to order a 20-year ban on new uranium mining claims within the Kanab Creek, Havasu Creek, and House Rock Valley watersheds that drain directly into the Grand Canyon is due by the end of the month. The Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) is due out at the end of this month. The Record of Decision will finalize the ban 30 days after the FEIS is released. SB 1690 is just the latest effort by the Mining industry to derail that decision. It’s vital to make sure that this decision is not derailed –and that Congress pays attention to what the 99% want instead of just what the 1% want. This is why those who value the Grand Canyon, and who object to this blatant corporate attempt to overturn an action supported by the majority of Americans, are being asked to call the White House at 202-456-1414 before October 28 to urge that Secretary Salazar’s moratorium on new uranium claims be finalized as soon as possible.
On October 12, Senator John McCain filed a bill in the Senate, SB 1690, designed to subvert a pending action by Secretary of the Interior Salazar and open up a million acres of public land around the Grand Canyon National Park to uranium mining. This despite the fact that polls repeatedly show that 70% of all Americans and two thirds of Arizonans do NOT want this area open to uranium mining, and that the overwhelming majority of the local tribal, county and city governments in the affected area have asked that it be permanently withdrawn from mineral entry. Once again in Congress corporate money is trumping the expressed will of the public.
An October 13, 2011 editorial in the Prescott Courier, a staunchly conservative newspaper in central Arizona, sums the situation up succinctly: "The effort to mine the proposed 1 million acres near the Grand Canyon is a Republican effort, and the paper trail of campaign contributions reveals why. According to U.S. News and World Report, the mining industry has contributed $3.4 million to Republican congressmen and women since 2009, compared to $900,000 for Democrats. In the Senate alone, the average mining industry contribution is almost $30,000 more per Republican than Democrat. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) is the highest recipient of mining money among Arizona lawmakers, pulling in more than $42,000 in contributions. Rep. Ben Quayle (R-Ariz.) is second with almost $40,000"
The stench is even more obvious when you read the text of SB 1690. Obviously written by the industry – it is remarkable even by Washington standards for its mendacity. It may be the most concentrated collection of outright lies and half truths ever put into a Senate Bill.
The bill claims that uranium mining in breccia pipes is low impact and has low risk of toxic pollution. In fact, the exact opposite is true. The Uranium mining industry is arguably the dirtiest industry in America with an almost perfect record of leaving behind serious problems with water pollution and long term toxic contamination wherever it has operated. It falsely claims that the Wilderness bill of 1984 guaranteed that mining would be permitted on the Arizona strip in perpetuity in return for the creation of a number of wilderness areas in other parts of the state– a guarantee that was not only never made, but could not have been made.
SB 1690 makes the usual specious claims about jobs (the government analysis estimates it would generate less than 100 direct jobs for six to seven years). It also pretends that the ore mined would generate revenues for the US government –although the companies involved are all foreign companies and under the 1872 mining law those who discover valuable minerals on public land do not have to pay any royalties on them. In fact, Uranium mining is almost guaranteed to cost the taxpayers money. It uses inflated USGS estimates of the amount of uranium ore in the entire Arizona Strip as though it were all being put off limits to mining, when in fact more than 800,000 acres that doesn’t directly impact the Grand Canyon remains open to mining.
But the most outrageous thing SB 1690 does is to usurp the authority of the Secretary of the Interior in order to turn the area adjacent to the Grand Canyon, the crown jewel of the National Park system and a world heritage site, into an industrial park. An industrial park that not only threatens the ecosystem of the Grand Canyon and the Colorado River, but also threatens to contaminate the drinking water of 25 million people downstream in California, Arizona and Nevada.
A landmark decision by Secretary of the Interior Salazar to order a 20-year ban on new uranium mining claims within the Kanab Creek, Havasu Creek, and House Rock Valley watersheds that drain directly into the Grand Canyon is due by the end of the month. The Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) is due out at the end of this month. The Record of Decision will finalize the ban 30 days after the FEIS is released. SB 1690 is just the latest effort by the Mining industry to derail that decision. It’s vital to make sure that this decision is not derailed –and that Congress pays attention to what the 99% want instead of just what the 1% want. This is why those who value the Grand Canyon, and who object to this blatant corporate attempt to overturn an action supported by the majority of Americans, are being asked to call the White House at 202-456-1414 before October 28 to urge that Secretary Salazar’s moratorium on new uranium claims be finalized as soon as possible.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
ARTICLE VIEWS: 1042
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
|
Proposition: The most likely doomsday scenario we face is not the one we are constantly being force-fed by dissembling politicians and the corporate-controlled media. The right-wing strategy aimed Saturday, 18 May 2013 |
|
When Barack Obama was running for president, he promised an administration that would be the most transparent of all time, one that would make sure the public was aware of how its government was Saturday, 18 May 2013 |
|
“When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.” - Sinclair LewisI am a longtime pro-choice physician and abortion provider who, as a psychiatrist before Friday, 17 May 2013 |
|
Since the emergence of the Internet, it has not been easy for government officials and mainstream media folks to get away with lying to us. It has become necessary, if for no other reason than Friday, 17 May 2013 |
|
Every sphere of life within the US is being transformed by the post-911 momentum toward tyranny. One outrageous violation after another assaults our liberties and places ever-more unrestrained power Friday, 17 May 2013 |
|
Have We The People been betrayed by President Obama and his fellow Democrats? Betrayal is a bitter pill to swallow, especially when one as an individual tries to maintain some semblance of hope that Thursday, 16 May 2013 |
|
Reconstructing nuclear confidence in post-Fukushima world is a long and painful process. But real-life energy demands especially in the developing countries predetermine a significant share of Thursday, 16 May 2013 |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
The Arizona State Geological Survey has the science and has demonstrated that development of the Arizona Strip poses no danger to the national park or population.
If you don't live in Arizona shut the F** up about things you know nothing about... or better yet, get a real education then open your mouths.
RSS feed for comments to this post