Written by Daniel Macmillen
Saturday, 23 April 2011 08:16
In the early days of February, Argentina was rocked by tragic news from the northern provinces of Chaco and Salta. One of the decade�s heaviest droughts had led to a devastating food crisis, with tens of thousands of people severely affected by the shortages. By the 11th of February, nine people in the province of Salta alone had died from nutritional deficiencies, including seven children. Indigenous communities in northern Chaco, Argentina�s poorest province, abandoned by meagre local government assistance, were forced to turn to eating tree roots. So how can such a shocking humanitarian issue occur in a nation which produces an amount of food ten times higher than that needed by its own population?
There are a variety of causes that have conditioned the nutritional crisis. On a primary level, malnutrition is no new-comer to Argentina and experienced a recent substantial increase after Argentina�s infamous economic crisis of 2001. The disastrous period left millions of Argentines in extreme poverty and hundreds of thousands of children deeply exposed to the danger of undernourishment. Economic issues aside, an underdeveloped rural healthcare system, a lack of educational awareness, widespread poverty and destitution have also contributed to the problem. It is no surprises then that the most heavily affected areas by malnutrition are Argentina�s northern indigenous communities who live profoundly detached from educational and medical centres.
More than a million Argentines suffer from malnutrition, and recurrent high-profile cases such as the recent deaths in Salta have brought attention to the need for drastic political involvement. The national government have undertaken a variety of measures to try and grapple with the problem, including the Universal Child Assignment Plan, which seeks to give a monthly sum of around 220 pesos (US$ 55) per child to working families under the poverty line. However, recent looks at the initiative by a prominent Argentine social think tank have shown that the plan does little to help secluded communities to access food, creating only an increase in family income without correcting the key nutritional deficit or improving access to food supplies. Calls have been made for more focused and specialized political policies, especially by Abel Albino, one of the most well-known and outspoken activists for the food crisis. What is needed however is much more concrete infrastructural action; emergency relief funds must be made more efficient in administering food supplies and education must be recognized as a fundamental tool in raising awareness on the problem to many communities who are deeply under-informed of the fatal dangers of malnutrition.
Raising consciousness on the issue is also essential; the �silent extermination� suffered by many of the indigenous communities is frequently overlooked in the political arena; however, there is hope that the recent tragedies may shed light onto the desperate need of development in the area. The food crisis is by all means not a problem only endemic to northern Argentina. According to recent UN statistics, malnutrition affects approximately 53 million people in Latin America and the Caribbean, and the growing number of environmental disasters and distorted weather patterns leave many rural communities in the region exposed to potential future food crises. A recent medical study observed that only 2% of Latin American medical centres have the appropriate facilities for dealing with patients of malnutrition. Despite all these obstacles, there have been recent improvements. Since Argentina�s economic meltdown in 2001, when more an average of 30 people died of malnutrition every day, the rate has been steadily decreasing to a rate of four deaths a day. But in the country which was once known as the �breadbasket of the world�, the recurrence of hunger and malnutrition is simply inadmissible.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
ARTICLE VIEWS: 11678
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
Monday, 30 August 2021 |
Sunday, 29 August 2021 |
Sunday, 29 August 2021 |
Sunday, 29 August 2021 |
Saturday, 28 August 2021 |
Thursday, 26 August 2021 |
Thursday, 26 August 2021 |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Remember as OWS might say, and Wikipedia does sayt, Banks caused the Great Depression. Prof. Said also for 1829 depression so they executed him. USA banks coukld now petition GOP to move Elixabeth Warren to Gitmo? That may save your Bankers?
You ask good questions, but I asked them of her some months ago and her reply was that she would be just as strong and fearless with the other issues. I think team 99% may have finally found their team leader.
..
Elizabeth Warren for President in 2016!!!!
Wow! You heard it here first. Keep in mind that Obama quickly moved from Illinois politics to the White House.
Or, will we be happy to let them express regret and then let them go back to business as usual.
So far, of course, they've gone back to business as usual and not shed a single crocodile tear.
On the other hand, I don't care much if some of these fraudsters go to the slammer or not. I don't even care much if they are somehow forced to pay restitution. What I want is for it never to happen again ... and that means real regulation - with Glass-Steagall being the MINIMUM.
Wonder if she can get them doin' hard time and paying back some of their ill-gotten gains.
Suggest that the pillory be reinstated and line 'em up along Wall Street with rotten tomatoes or horse-shit before they begin their long trek to Abu Grahib.
Go after 'em and be as merciless as they have been and are, Eliza'!
That's all it takes to get through transparently wrong behavior to the core of what needs to be done.
I still send her what I can afford each month. Yes, we signed petitions to get her in the Senate, and we're going to do the same to make her President. No more inside cronyism and revolving doors. Power to the People.
And if she does wind up having a few bankers indicted, the author's warning that some banks may go out of business is also ludicrous and insulting. Why shouldn't a criminal enterprise have to pay the price for its crimes? And there would certainly be plenty of other banks to take their place. I, for one, am not worried.
She's a GEM because she's Elizabeth Warren. NOT because she's another carrier of the XX Chomosome.
We love her- she has more balls than most senators. If Corey Booker runs and gets in - that would also be a great addition.
Elizabeth Warren has come along-- AT LAST -- someone who is fighting FOR THE PEOPLE!!!! BRAVO, and let's ALL SUPPORT HER TO THE ULTIMATE DEGREE!!!
I THANK YOU, Elizabeth Warren, and my hat is off to you, because speaking the TRUTH is not something we hear a lot these days!!! BRAVO and MORE THANKYOU'S!!
Beverly Smith
Go for it, gals!
As a fellow member of the male gender, get real. We have no shortage of elected women to demonstrate the blindness of your position.
Elizabeth Warren is as GREAT as HUMANS come !
Voting for anyone based upon what's between their legs instead of what's between their ears is simply childish.
I agree with what you say, par, that if some banks go out of business because they are unable to operate justly and legally, than they should. In the 1930's, FDR seized a number of banks and placed them under government control until they came round. This is the sort of action that is required. Kevin Roose is either worried about sounding like a radical, perhaps for career reasons, or is a closet apologist for the financial services industry, but he lacks a sense of what is necessary in these extreme circumstances. Warren is exactly right to criticize the reluctance of regulators and DOJ officials at all levels, so extreme that it resembles nepotism.
Now, there are two ...
Not only are the Republicans in bed with the Wall Street criminals, along with some Democrats, even Obama is involved in covering up corporate crime. Attorney General Holder is also a Wall Street lackey, along with much of Obama's cabinet. Also remember that even Bill Clinton signed off on ending the protections that were instituted un Glass- Steagall, so I wouldn't trust Hillary either. We also need public financing of elections along with instilling our Supreme Court with justices that have the interests of our nation as a whole as a primary interest. Since a democracy gets what it deserves, we have become too passive and dumb as an electorate, so as to let these corporate criminals take control of our nation.
Alan Grayson is the Representative from Orlando, but he would be a great Senator. From your post to God's ear!
We need a two-pronged approach.
When a corporation agrees to an out-of-court settlement, that ought to be taken as an admission that some illegal conduct did occur. That should be a consideration for the Justice Department to seek indictments and trial for the individuals (i.e. executives) who were responsible for those crimes.
Since a regulatory agency could act against a corporation and the Justice Department against individuals there should be no double-jeoparey questions.
Show that the Law exists, for everyone.
Put them in prison along with all the poor and middle class people who may or may not belong there.
That's why we need a two-pronged approach because such an agreement with a regulatory agency wouldn't apply to an agency such as the Justice Department. One agency can't make a agreement that subverts the authority of another agency, no more than your neighbor making a deal with the city that affects your rights.
No quarter, Dr. Warren. Go get 'em. We have your back.
This woman has a handle on the situation.
Senator Elizabeth Warren wears glasses in order to see better;
Sarah Palin wore glasses in order to appear better.
Isn't it incredible that just one person can shine such a light on the path that has been lost in the slime and murkiness of government today?
Dr Jill Stein and Senator Warren!
Then we would not need to have a real revolution in order to regain positive momentum on all fronts.
But yes, BRAVO!!! and AMEN! to Sen Warren.
As senator he voted for the bail outs and as president OweBama doled out our money -- to his political friends.