Gucciardi writes: "Overall, the decision to go with such a major act of corruption has jump started a massive movement to hold politicians and corporations accountable for their betrayal of the US public. It's a move that has blown up in the face of those who thought they could slip it through into law."
US President Barack Obama signed the Monsanto Protection Act. (photo: Brendan Smialowsky/AFP)
Monsanto Protection Act Ignites Massive Activism
30 March 13
hile Monsanto executives may be rejoicing behind the closed doors of their corporate offices, they have also just stabbed themselves in the heart with the blatant and cocky decision to go through with the Monsanto Protection Act. Obama's social media profiles are being blown up with thousands of enraged activists and concerned citizens who are demanding answers.
Thanks to the alternative news covering every angle of the Protection Act and the absurd fact that Monsanto actually wrote the rider itself, people have now come to fully understand just how deep the corruption goes when it comes to Monsanto's Big Food monopoly. And it doesn't exempt the President.
It's a well known fact that the Obama family actually eats from the White House organic garden which was planted in 2009 and has full time staffers who maintain and harvest organic produce that comes from the garden. Many high level politicians actually refuse to eat anything but organic, as they are fully aware of what's in 'conventional', GMO-loaded items. Yet, despite this knowledge, they are quite eager to push Monsanto's GMOs and ruthless business model on the citizens of the United States.
And the people are fully aware of the betrayal.
Scanning just a few comments amid the thousands calling out Obama for his signature on the spending bill that contained the Monsanto Protection Act, we find seriously frustrated activists and voters who can't believe what they are seeing. Even many Obama campaigners who came to the realization that Obama didn't represent what they thought he did. One specifically mentions how Obama promised to label GMOs in 2007 upon taking the seat of the President. A promise that never came to fruition. In fact, no real attempts were made at all.
Here are a few comments among the thousands that I found interesting on Obama's wall:
Darlene Taylor: Barack Obama - 2007: "We'll let folks know if their food is genetically modified because Americans should know." 2013: He signed the Monsanto Protection Act making GMO giants immune to the law.
Erica Ecker: Apparently part of protecting our children no longer includes what goes in them. Thanks for signing the Monsanto Protection Act.
Keri Kline: I am an activist for President Obama, and I am outraged he has failed to listen to the 'American people he represents'... President Obama knowingly signed the Monsanto Protection Act over the insistence of more than 250,000 Americans who signed an urgent letter asking that he use his executive authority to veto H.R. 933 and send it back to Congress to remove the Monsanto Protection Act from the bill. Regretfully, President Obama failed to live up to his oath to protect the American people and our constitution.
Overall, the decision to go with such a major act of corruption has jump started a massive movement to hold politicians and corporations accountable for their betrayal of the US public. It's a move that has blown up in the face of those who thought they could slip it through into law.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Hint: if Trump/Burr can have their own police force, so can the citizens of Flint, Detroit...
Elections MUST be held in full public view "on the same day." Sorry about that Covid thing. wear a mask. With enough voting place, a hand count can be completed in time for the "networks" to have their story, so we can go to sleep... or not.
knocking down statues costs us votes.
If what palast says is true than putting all of your energy into the million hours of Russia gate is a mistake that needs to be acknowledged.
All of your trump-hating would have been unnecessary because he never would have set foot in the White House if the Democratic party had demanded the recount. Hey, you want someone to blame blame Hillary herself and the Democratic party itself and you might want to ask them why they did not want to win.
You are right. The Russiagate was a total mistake, a distraction from the real issues we needed to be talking about, and a strategy to blame Trump for something he did not actually participate in.
Yes reality-based Palast never a Russia conspiretalist. Because I have followed him for near 20 years, originally Democracy NOW and bought his books, I have shouted at unregenative Democrats: it is not NaderGreensLeft istsRussians (whatever current scapegoat) it is electorial cheating initiated and allowed to proliferate by both parties and the Supreme Court.
And ignored by most political discussion -- so kudos to RSN.
The Don doesn't need to directly participate in anything for it to happen.
And why are the county registrars still allowed to confuse voters with cross-over ballots, absentee ballots or instructing volunteers to "not say anything" forcing voters to "ask" for the right ballot if they're lucky enough to know better? What happened to exit polls? Why are antique machines even allowed anymore? The country would riot if the Super Bowl was broadcast on unreliable and antique machinery.
Observing the count (during the election) was a joke. Sample ballots were drawn from piles in a private room out of public view.
The only thing about voting that's changed is that the Republicans have made it harder and the Democrats have done nothing but sit back and count their Wall St. cash because they don't loose no matter who's in the Oval. It's the same corporate party.
Only people like Greg who's doing the heavy lifting doing the research to educate the public will bring about any change.
Voting matters in that it serves as a legitimate cover for whoever gets installed and is why we need to change it.
By Greg Palast, Reader Supported News
25 July 20
"This little chapter from How Trump Stole 2020 tells you how they did it in 2016 and can do it again in 2020:"
whereas of 2018 michigan has a dem secretary of state - (attorneys general and governor too)
robbee declares -
these outrages could not have happened, unless abetted by repukes, up and down the line
this will not happen again in 2020 - not in my state
note that the refusal to count votes in michigan happened under a repuke secretary of state (attorneys general and governor too)
this year there's a new sheriff in michigan - and she's all dem!
ps - greg is also an expert on cross-check - and who knows how many MILLIONS OF votes by folks with latino names? - repute secretaries of state threw out? destroyed? - no record kept?
voting in america is a shell game, expressly approved by sbcouts
but it's the only game we have
despair is no political strategy
V O T E !
pps - ifeuille's great idea is a federal mail-in voting rights law, backed by a one-day army of onsite federal inspectors at each local polling site? if i have that right? - i would add inspectors, at each s o s office
ppps - meanwhile we man polling sites with independent poll watchers!
What this shows is that repubicans have become masters of this technique, especially challenging votes that don't go their way. They also have zip coded voter lists so they car rule out places like east Detroit.
And the Democrats always behave the same way. They just throw their hands up in the air and make some profound expression like "darn it." And then they move on to collecting cash from their big donors -- who they don't know also backed the republican side.
The billionaire donors win at this game. They get the candidates they want. Democrat party bosses get a lot of money. Republicans get the elected offices and the bills they want passed. Everyone is happy. The american people get screwed -- again, and again, and again.
There were/are a bunch of computer experts some of whom came out of Princeton, who have been trying for years to put out the word about how easy it is to hack e-voting.
a word of warning though. Trump-hate of mail-in vote, is "please don' throw me in dat brier patch Br'er Fox. Please. Please.
I don't know if there has ever been mail-in voting fraud, but there easily could be, the point is that it is not transparent.
do we really need to get the television stations the results before midnight at the expense of never knowing who "really' won?
Accuracy is all that matters, not speed. It's the difference between a legitimate election and an illegitimate one.
The Republicans suppress the minority voters in the general election. The Democrats suppressed the (young) Bernie voters in the primaries.