RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Parry writes: "Whenever some deranged gunman, armed with an assault rifle or some other combat weapon, slaughters young Americans I think of those documentaries showing Wildebeest on their migrations through crocodile-infested rivers."

Crosses are seen at a memorial for victims behind the theater where a gunman opened fire on moviegoers in Aurora, Colorado, 07/22/12. (photo: Reuters)
Crosses are seen at a memorial for victims behind the theater where a gunman opened fire on moviegoers in Aurora, Colorado, 07/22/12. (photo: Reuters)



America: A Nation of Wildebeest

By Robert Parry, Consortium News

23 July 12

 

henever some deranged gunman, armed with an assault rifle or some other combat weapon, slaughters young Americans - at a college or a high school or a mall or, now, a movie theater - I think of those documentaries showing Wildebeest on their migrations through crocodile-infested rivers.

In their frightened eyes, you can see that the herd knows that each crocodile will pick off an individual Wildebeest, flip it in the air, break its back and then drag it away to be devoured. But the herd still crashes through the river presumably with the understanding that most of them will survive. The Wildebeest may even be emotionally numbed to the fate of the unlucky ones.

In a way, that is what Americans have become. As we send our children off to school or off to a party or off to the movies, we know instinctively that some of them may well die at the hands of some troubled person who has obtained a powerful weapon and has decided to avenge some imagined slight by murdering strangers.

Sometimes, the dead are in large numbers (like at the Aurora, Colorado, multi-plex theater), but usually it's just one or two at a time. We just hope that it's not our kids.

We weep over the tragedy of strangers, but our secret thought is thank goodness it wasn't my son or daughter. We are like the Wildebeest continuing the migration hoping that at the next river it won't be our turn.

At such moments, it's also typical for news media pundits to wave their fingers at politicians for not having the "courage" to stop this mayhem by standing up to the ruthless National Rifle Association and its gun-obsessed fringe. But the harder truth is that the problem is not with America's politicians; it's with the American voters.

There have been politicians who have favored common-sense gun control, but most of them are now former politicians. Remember Michael Dukakis, the Democratic presidential nominee in 1988. He favored strong gun control, and his Republican rival, George H.W. Bush, clobbered him over the issue.

Bush accused Dukakis of wanting to disarm all private citizens. "That is not the American way," declared Bush at one campaign rally. "I feel just the opposite."

Some political observers believe that Dukakis's brave stand for gun control was a key factor in his landslide defeat. And, today, Dukakis is a punch line synonymous with "loser" while Bush is revered by Official Washington, recently honored with a flattering documentary on HBO.

Bush and other pro-gun Republican presidents then packed the U.S. Supreme Court with like-minded justices who reversed long-standing precedents and reinterpreted the Second Amendment as an individual right to bear arms, rather than a communal need to have a "well-regulated Militia."

There is merit to both sides of that argument. When the Second Amendment was adopted by the First Congress (and was then ratified in 1791), the young United States was a frontier nation where firearms also were important for hunting and for protection from such threats as outlaws, European rivals disputing America's boundaries, and Native Americans resisting encroachment into their lands.

But the Founders' real intent for the Second Amendment can be better understood from their actions in the Second Congress when the Militia Acts were passed, mandating that every white man of military age must purchase a musket and other equipment. Black men were excluded from this provision.

In those early decades, the Second Amendment also wasn't regarded as a universal right. African-American slaves and even many free blacks were denied the right to own guns in Southern and border states under the so-called "Black Codes," laws largely affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1857 Dred Scott decision.

As the United States became more urban - and even in some frontiers towns of the Wild West - laws were passed to reduce violence by placing restrictions on guns. During the Prohibition Era, when gangsters began using machineguns, the federal government stepped in with legislation to restrict these dangerous weapons.

However, the political tide began to turn in the 1980s as a resurgent Right saw a potent issue championing broader "gun rights." The National Rifle Association evolved from being mostly a gun club training young people in the safe use of firearms into a ruthless and feared political lobby.

The 1988 election - with George H.W. Bush portraying Michael Dukakis as an un-American weakling for favoring gun control - marked a turning point in the national debate, but Dukakis was far from alone as a politician whose career ended ignominiously because he crossed the NRA.

By the early 1990s, the anti-gun-control lobby was drawing populist support from right-wing "militias" who saw the violent standoffs at Ruby Ridge and Waco as signs of a massive federal (even global) conspiracy to disarm Americans. Right-wing radio talkers and pols recognized guns as another wedge issue to divide the nation.

Advocates for "common-sense gun laws" soon were reeling, as the NRA punched loophole after loophole in gun restrictions. Pro-gun politics also merged with the Right's larger strategy of undoing all kinds of federal regulations. In effect, the populist rhetoric of "gun rights" gave macho muscle to freeing Wall Street bankers to have the "freedom" to do whatever they wanted.

So, as the nation grieves the 12 dead moviegoers who were gunned down while watching the new Batman film - as Aurora takes its place with Columbine, Virginia Tech, Tucson and other sites of infamous slaughters - it's almost tiresome to see the various players reprise their predictable parts.

We have politicians offering prayers; celebrities expressing shock via Twitter; gun lobbyists blaming the latest deranged individual, not his weapons; and, yes, sanctimonious pundits lamenting the lack of "courage" among politicians (though many of the same pundits join in snickering whenever the name "Dukakis" is mentioned).

We also have the latest group of grieving families with that stunned look of disbelief in their eyes. The rest of us will join the candle-burning vigils and tear up over the stories of promising lives cut short. But privately we will thank goodness that the victims of this latest massacre (or the more numerous dead from the many daily examples of less-newsworthy gun violence) weren't our own children.

We know in our gut that it is really only a matter of luck. We are like the Wildebeest on migration, plunging into a crocodile-infested river hoping that we and our loved ones emerge on the other side.



Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, "Neck Deep: The Disastrous Presidency of George W. Bush," was written with two of his sons, Sam and Nat, and can be ordered at neckdeepbook.com. His two previous books, "Secrecy & Privilege: The Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq" and "Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth'" are also available there.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+13 # tswhiskers 2012-07-23 13:14
Yes, after another massacre comes the ritual cry for gun control that we all know is de rigueur and therefore all but meant to be ignored. In this time when federal govt. has all but broken down so that Congress cannot pass meaningful legislation but the states can pass without a murmur some of the most anti-democratic laws this country has ever known, is it not strange that the right to bear arms, even concealed arms, is so strongly entrenched in American society. When state and federal Republicans have done away with all the rights that make us a free society, we'll have one right left, namely the right to be armed. We will at least be armed wildebeest and live in the hope that those armed few can bring down the occasional lion. The fact that a herd member will now and then go gunning for other defenseless wildebeest is the price we wildebeest pay so that a crazy herd member can express his right to endanger the entire herd.
 
 
+4 # SoCalStar 2012-07-23 21:16
Strenge how there was another attempted mass murder in Aurora, Colorado a few months ago in April, but that one never made the news much. This one involved an armed concealed-carry permit holder who stopped the gunman from killing more than one person at church. Of course, this doesn't fit the narrative of the politically correct world of armed citizens deterring crime, so very few know about this.
 
 
-1 # Glen 2012-07-24 09:09
There also was a car running at great speed in the last couple of days, that, when stopped, was found to be filled with weapons. The driver said he had also walked into a theater with his AK or AR, not sure which, and the movie was Dark Knight. How about the bar shootings in Alabama? How about the the fellow in the internet cafe in Florida who put a stop to a robbery with his handgun.

This stuff goes on regularly. Year in and year out. All I have ever known my whole life is somebody killing somebody or a lot of somebodys, whether it makes national news or not. A good enough reason to stay alert.
 
 
+2 # shraeve 2012-07-24 12:51
There was also the case of Gina Gonzalez, whose Arizona home was invaded on May 30, 2009. The invaders murdered Gonzalez' 9-year-old daughter, and would have murdered her except for the fact that she grabbed a pistol and drove them off.

We don't hear about cases like that from the politically correct types.
 
 
0 # Glen 2012-07-25 05:06
Now that you have brought this up, it come to mind a number of crimes in my state that could have been prevented had the victims had guns and were trained to use them. A mother and daughter who heard the daughter's ex-husband breaking down the front door, ran out the back door, the guy then ran around the house and beat them both. One of them died. That sort of thing CAN be stopped. Years ago I was awakened in the middle of the night by a truckload of drunken cowboys who were attempting to get in the front door. I opened it, which caused a brief silence. During the silence I cocked my gun which every one of them could hear. That's all it took. They hit the road.

Nope. You don't hear about any of these cases.
 
 
+4 # ABen 2012-07-24 02:34
To paraphrase from the movie The President's Analyst; We are an open-minded and peace loving people, and I will shoot any SOB that doesn't believe that.
 
 
0 # massager2002 2012-07-24 03:55
Why do people blame guns? Crimes are committed with knives, ropes, axes, hammers, homemade bombs, water, fire; but everyone owns or uses these "things" everyday. Things don't kill people, deranged humans kill people! If every gun were to magically disappear from every pocket or home, you would still find a deranged person who committed horrendous crimes in some other way! How do you get into the mind of a psycho who has stayed under the radar and not lifted any red flags??? There were several in this case; large amounts of ammo were purchased, several weapons purchased within a short time??? Those we trust to SEE these "Red Flags" for us and circumvent the "crime" are sorely at fault! We have our police looking for small time crimes like 1 oz of cocaine or pot! Where are the computers and the records they keep? Doesn't BATF keep or receive records that tell the tale of a greater potential crime in the making! You would think that a data based society like we are would have had all these links together and someone would have "SEEN" the potential for a crime in the making? Don't come looking on my place for a gun to confiscate because a psycho perp committed a crime now! I keep my guns handy for the occasional "snake" "coyote" or burglar who wants to take what is mine instead of working for it himself, because our overworked police are miles away and working hard to catch drugs and illegals crossing the border!
 
 
+3 # Glen 2012-07-24 09:14
Good point, massager2002. As I have said, the cops and government choose their own targets. As well as their tracking methods. As I have said in the past, if a diseased cow can be tracked from Canada to the U.S. and back, why not gun sales?
 
 
0 # tswhiskers 2012-07-25 11:36
You often hear the argument that there are weapons other than guns. The thing is, knives, ropes, etc. don't have chambers that will let hundreds of knives, ropes, go off within seconds. Look at it this way: would you rather face an attacker with a knife or one with what amounts to a machine gun? How many people could be killed with a knife, a club or a garrott? That's the diff between a knife and an automatic weapon. In the CO attack 70 people were killed or wounded. I think even a SEAL would have a hard time doing that with a knife.
 
 
+1 # Glen 2012-07-24 04:38
Human beings are both predator as well as the ole herd animal. We are complicated, and easily damaged, also. It is, however, definitely possible to step out of that herd to make decisions for ourselves and to maintain an awareness of those who are predators. For centuries folks have had the need to be alert, to watch for human predators as well as animal predators. Nothing has changed but our expectations.

We'd like to assume a civilized existence, but it isn't. Best to remain alert and prepared, rather than running wild eyed in fear.
 
 
+8 # Phlippinout 2012-07-24 06:10
I am glad someone talks about the racial politics of guns. I have always felt that packing a gun in plain view was a white mans privilege because if a black or brown man packed a weapon in plain sight he would be shot down dead without a doubt. I can spot a bullshit double standard from miles away, but when i discuss it white people get upset and call me an apologist. Evidently, apologist is the new word for anyone who sees this double standard.
 
 
0 # shraeve 2012-07-24 12:53
Many people have made the case that gun control is racist.
 
 
+9 # Phlippinout 2012-07-24 06:22
Oh yeah, I also think that Americans are the biggest bunch of cowards on the planet. Afraid of equality, petrified by change and terrified to think outside of their miserable box of media hype and propaganda. The biggest misinformed population in the rich world. Take your guns and shove them, hey, what a great way to deal with shooters, a public gathering where we shove their weapons up their butts and then send them off to where ever murderers go. I for one am sick of the gun culture. Want an AK 47 that fires a hundred rounds? Join the military. Get that crap off our streets!
 
 
+7 # mdhome 2012-07-24 06:31
Time for this country to grow up and realize there is no way any citizen needs a 30 shot rifle, if you can't kill that grizzly with one shot, maybe you deserve to be bear scat.
 
 
+5 # reiverpacific 2012-07-24 08:25
I've been fascinated by watching the back-and-forth between pro and anti- gun RSN posters, the pro using the same old tired NRA rhetoric and some of the anti (I'm one) being pretty predictable too.
I don't have a problem with someone who is responsible, well versed and trained in marksmanship and weapon maintenance having an appropriate, licensed firearm to provide a certain amount of meat in season to feed themselves and their dependents.
But for those who own high-powered arms to allegedly "Protect their Families", I offer you En Memorium a cumulative example of how effective their protection might be. The Waco, Texas Firebombing of the heavily armed and prepared Branch Dividians, the FBI and Janet Reno.
May you be comforted by your li'l popguns, no matter how juiced up they are.
 
 
+5 # Glen 2012-07-24 09:01
The government picks and chooses its tagets, reiverpacific. The Davidians had no plans to take over the government, therefore there was no reason to send in tanks and kill everyone in that compound. Nobody can stand against tanks and worse. That IS a lesson citizens should learn if they think it is a government they can stand against with an AK. On the other hand, a typical break-in or assassin is not going to arrive in a tank.

I, too, am fatigued with the squabbling over guns. A LOT of us are pro-gun but are also pro-responsibil ity. Many in the anti-gun camp do not understand that.
 
 
+4 # Majikman 2012-07-24 09:36
Bush II co-opted the 2nd amendment when he seized control of our "well regulated militia" from the governors of the states and sent them to Iraq. Where was Louisiana's National Guard during Katrina? Off in Iraq with most of their equipment. Enter Blackwater to "protect" the city.
Of course the NRA and the pols want you to have assault weapons to "protect" yourselves from the gov't. It gives you the illusion of safety and blinds you to the real crocodiles.
 
 
+3 # tabonsell 2012-07-24 14:15
This one statement:

"reinterpreted the Second Amendment as an individual right to bear arms, rather than a communal need to have a 'well-regulated Militia'."

says it all about some of our present-day Supreme Court judges. Had the committee headed by James Madison and the Congress that submitted the proposal to the states wanted an "individual" right to keep and bear arms They would have written "no person's right..." They didn't do that, they purposely wrote "the right of the people..." meaning a communal right.

Our conservative judges can't read properly.

While such as Antonin Scalia claim to be representing "original intent" of the Founders, that intent seems to be missing in Scalia's opinions. The original intent was that the population be armed so government could create a militia out of the population to perform the duties listed in Article I, Section 8, which says:

"to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrection and repel Invasions."

On second thought; these conservative judges can't properly think either.
 
 
0 # Livemike 2012-08-02 18:23
I'm sorry but you're schoolarship is somewhat lacking. The right of the people always meant the right of every person. That is particularly true of the first 8 amendments to the constitution (and that's not my opinion, it's the SC). If they had meant to guarantee the right of states to have a militia they would have mentioned the states. The 2nd clearly protected an individual right not a "communal right" which is a mythical creature that doesn't exist. Militias, as anyone alive then knew, existed because of INDIVIDUAL ownership of weapons. That's why, in Britain and America weapons ownership was made COMPULSORY.
 
 
0 # Michael_K 2012-07-25 13:10
Political Correctness is 100% pure unadulterated hypocrisy. Either you allow guns, or you don't. A society in which only the law-abiding are unarmed, caught between the gangsters with or without badges, is a dying society.
 
 
0 # Livemike 2012-08-02 18:16
Wow, you're actually using a blatnntly racist act to justify claiming the 2nd isn't about an individual right. You leftists really will sink as low as you need to lie about something won't you? Yes blacks were denied the individual right to bear arms under the black codes, but they were denied a lot of other rights too, including freedom of contract, of movement, and of speech. Of course you don't argue that these are not individual rights.

There is no argument about this, the term "right" in the constitution ALWAYS refers to an individual right, not a "collective" one. It's idiotic to think there is a right to be compelled to join an organisation, how much of a contradiction is that? The militia by definition requires an armed populace, and so the 2nd ensured the individual right so there would alawys be one. How hard is that to understand?
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN