RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

The Aurora massacre has led to new calls for a national debate on gun control. Amy Goodman talks with Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, an advocate of stricter gun laws in the US.

The four weapons recovered in the deadly movie shootings were all purchased by the suspect from retail gun stores in Colorado in the last two months. (photo: AP)
The four weapons recovered in the deadly movie shootings were all purchased by the suspect from retail gun stores in Colorado in the last two months. (photo: AP)



Are We Going to Wait for Another Massacre?

By Rep. Carolyn McCarthy and Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!

24 July 12

 

 

MY GOODMAN: We continue our conversation on the Aurora, Colorado, massacre that killed 12 and injured 58 at a midnight film screening of Batman last Friday. The Aurora rampage is leading to fresh calls for a national debate on gun control. New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, an advocate of stricter gun laws, said President Obama and Republican candidate Mitt Romney need to lead that discussion on guns.

MAYOR MICHAEL BLOOMBERG: Somebody's got to do something about this. And this requires - and particularly in a presidential year - the candidates for president of the United States to stand up and once and for all say, yes, they feel terrible; yes, it's a tragedy; yes, we have great sympathy for the families - but it's time for this country to do something. And that's the job of the president of the United States. And I don't know what they're going to do, but I think it's incumbent on them to tell us specifically, not just in broad terms.

AMY GOODMAN: On Sunday, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said President Obama would not endorse any new gun control measures. Carney said, quote, "He believes we need to take steps that protect Second Amendment rights of the American people but that ensure we're not allowing weapons into the hands of individuals who should not, by existing law, obtain those weapons."

For more, we're joined now, for the remainder of the show, by survivors of gun violence and family members of those who did not survive gun violence. We start by Democracy Now! video stream with Democratic Congressmember Carolyn McCarthy of New York. Her husband was killed, her son injured, in a 1993 mass shooting on the Long Island Rail Road that killed six people.

Congressmember McCarthy, welcome to Democracy Now! Before we talk about what needs to be done, go back to 1993, if you will, to talk about what happened to your husband and son.

REP. CAROLYN McCARTHY: It was December 7th, 1993. My husband and my son and so many other commuters were taking the Long Island Rail Road back home on the 5:33 train. Right before it pulled into a station in Garden City, Colin Ferguson, the shooter, got up. He had a - many magazines with 15 bullets in each gun and started just pointing his gun at everybody's head and started shooting. The second person to be shot and killed was my husband. And my son, who was sitting next to him, was also shot in the head, but he did survive. Even during this time, he's still partially paralyzed and certainly has to go to physical therapy a couple of times a week.

It was from there that - you know, people just don't understand what these horrific wounds do to people. We did not know whether Kevin was going to live. It was months before we were sure that he was going to survive. We didn't know at that time whether he would ever walk again. We didn't even know at that time whether he would ever be able to speak again. But I have to say that he certainly was brave through everything. And all I kept telling him, that he was going to survive, he was going to survive. And we had a lot of work to do. As you know, my background was a nurse. I still consider myself a nurse. And it was at that time, when Kevin was learning how to speak again - and I'm making this sound very easy, but he asked me, "How could this happen?" And I didn't know. And that's when I started becoming an activist and looking at gun violence in this country.

AMY GOODMAN: And so, describe what happened. You went to your congressman's office. Who was it at the time, and how this really launched your political career?

REP. CAROLYN McCARTHY: Well, at the time, I did meet with our congressman. His name was Dan Frisa. He basically said that he supported Second Amendment rights. He was being backed by the National Rifle Association. And I was begging him that when the vote came up in Congress that he would vote against it, as the other members of the Long Island delegation at that time were going to vote. We knew it was going to be down to one or two votes to have it passed. Unfortunately, in the end, he voted against the bill.

And I happened to be in the Capitol at that time, as so many visitors do, was up in the balcony looking down. I didn't know the rules or regulations of Congress at that time, and apparently you're not allowed to yell out. And when the bill passed, I just, you know, yelled and said, "Thank you! Thank you!" Of course, then the security guards come over. But to know that my member of Congress, in the area that he represented - six people were killed, 21 injured severely - and I was coming down the Capitol steps after the vote, and a reporter asked me how mad I was at my congressman, and I said I was furious. And he said, "Well, what are you going to do about it? Would you run for Congress?" And it was at that moment I said I would.

And the next thing I knew, when I got home here in Mineola, my phone was ringing off the hook. People were showing up at my door just saying, "We want to help you. We want to help you." And by the way, you know, at that time I was a registered Republican, but it didn't matter. Republicans, Democrats were there to help me run for Congress, and that's what I did.

AMY GOODMAN: And so, you won in what year?

REP. CAROLYN McCARTHY: I won in 1996.

AMY GOODMAN: And you've been in office ever since. You ran on a platform of gun control. What has been accomplished in that time? And what do you make of President Obama, through his spokesperson, through Jay Carney, saying that the current laws are adequate to stop someone like this, if we enforce them?

REP. CAROLYN McCARTHY: Well, actually, that's not true. If we were going to enforce the laws on the books, which, believe me, I fully support - we have the NICS system that basically does background checks, but as you know, the shooter passed that legally. If he had been adjudicated to be mentally ill, he would not have been able to buy the gun. The problem is, he was able to buy the large magazines. He was able to buy assault weapons. If everybody remembers, when that bill, the assault weapons bill, was passed, for years it was very, very difficult to get assault weapons. You also could not get the large magazine clips. Unfortunately, in the year 2004, Congress let it expire, even though at that time President Bush said that he would sign the bill, and so did Vice President Cheney. But unfortunately, it did expire, and now we have the assault weapons, and now we have the large magazines back on the market for anybody else - for anybody to buy.

AMY GOODMAN: So, the assault weapons ban did sunset then in 2004. Congressmember [McCarthy], I wanted to get your response to Republican Senator John McCain, who appeared on CNN's State of the Union. He said he was skeptical more gun control is necessary.

SEN. JOHN McCAIN: I think that the strongest Second Amendment rights people would be glad to have a conversation, but to somehow leap to the conclusion that this was somehow caused by the fact that we don't have more gun control legislation, I don't think has been proved.

AMY GOODMAN: That's Senator McCain. We're speaking to Congressmember Carolyn McCarthy of Long Island, New York. Your response to the man who was beaten by President Obama, by Senator McCain?

REP. CAROLYN McCARTHY: Well, how I would respond to the senator - and I certainly have a great deal of respect for him on so many different issues, but with that being said, when you have had these mass killings going back to 1993, when my husband was killed and my son was shot, all the way up to Friday night, large magazines were not being able to be bought. Now they're on the streets. All these major shootings, what was the common denominator to them? They had large magazines that could kill as many people as possible in as short a period of time. In that movie house that night, the police responded in 90 seconds. Ninety seconds. And the shooter was able to wound 70 people and kill. And the only reason he didn't kill or maim other people, because his gun jammed. Can you imagine if he had gotten off the hundred rounds? Yes, the courts have already said people have a right to own a gun to defend theirselves in the home. We are not infringing upon that. What we're saying is, large magazines, assault weapons do not need to be on the streets for the ordinary citizen. They are meant for the military. They are meant for certainly safety officers or police officers, who, by the way, are being killed by these particular guns now.

And I think that the American people understand that. The problem is, politicians, legislators across this country are intimidated by the NRA and the gun manufacturers who put so much money out there to say that "we will take you down in an election if you go against us." Common sense will say we can take prudent gun safety legislation and try to save people's lives. That is the bottom line. And if people would really look at what it costs this health - this country on healthcare, billions of dollars are spent every single year for those that survive.

AMY GOODMAN: Congressmember McCarthy, I know that you have to leave, but asking you this question now, what, some - almost 20 years later, you're coming down the steps of Congress. We now have now seen this next mass killing. What are you doing about this in Congress? What is the legislation that you're pushing specifically now? And as you said, you were a Republican, you then ran on the Democratic ticket. It doesn't matter, your party. Yet you are a Democrat now, and President Obama says that we don't need new legislation. So what are you doing?

REP. CAROLYN McCARTHY: Well, you know, from what I saw, the president did not say that, his spokesperson said that.

AMY GOODMAN: Yes.

REP. CAROLYN McCARTHY: Last night, I did watch him speak at the services for the victims and after visiting the victims. He did say that we had to do something, we had to do something to stop this kind of violence in our country. It's going to be up to me and certainly many members of Congress to convince him. We are willing to lose an election to save people's lives, and the president should be doing the same thing.

AMY GOODMAN: The legislation that has been stalled in Congress this year that would have stopped the high-capacity drum magazine large enough of holding a hundred rounds, capable of firing 50 to 60 rounds per minute, would have been restricted under this legislation - what is it called?

REP. CAROLYN McCARTHY: Well, actually, your audience could certainly help. We're trying to get people to sign on to support H.R. 308. We want people to call the White House, we want people to call the speaker of the House, to say this is commonsense legislation that will stop these large magazines being on our streets, being in the stores, being on the internet. I think it's important that people have to start saying we need to get involved more. We can certainly outnumber so many of those NRA members that keep fighting us back. We have the numbers in this country, but we need to hear their voices.

So, basically, what it would do is ban - it would bring it back to the Assault Weapons Ban Act, where the large magazines could not be sold. We need the Americans' support. Your listeners can be part of that solution. We're asking everybody to share their voice. Let the president know there is support from the other side, us, us that have been trying to fight to reduce gun violence in this country. Are we going to wait for another massacre? Are we going to have this discussion six months, another year, 12, 13, 20, a hundred people die? We can't wait anymore. We need help. I can do what I need to do in Congress, but I do need the support of many other members of Congress, and I hope - I hope - your message and my message gets out to your listeners, that they are capable of doing something. But we need help.

AMY GOODMAN: Finally, Congressmember McCarthy, to those who say, "The victims have not even been buried yet. To use this as a political opportunity to start debating gun control is unconscionable," which I've heard on various networks - your response to that?

REP. CAROLYN McCARTHY: Listen. You know, the only time, unfortunately, that we even even talk about this issue is when we see a slaughter, as we saw Friday. The only time that we got to talk about this issue was last January, when Gabby Giffords and other people were shot and killed. So I, speaking as a victim, I have the right to use that voice. And, yes, I am now a member of Congress, so I do have that right, because no one pays attention to this issue until there's killings like this. We need to do something to try to prevent the killings in the future, which will happen, unfortunately.

AMY GOODMAN: Congressmember Carolyn McCarthy, I thank you for being with us, Democrat of New York, actually formerly a Republican, but ran for office after her husband was killed and son injured in the 1993 shooting on the Long Island Rail Road.

See Also: Suspect in Colorado Theater Shooting Appears in Court

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+3 # DaveM 2012-07-24 07:31
The Aurora shooter violated who knows how many laws in the course of committing his crime. Will passing more laws stop more people just like him (and sadly, there almost certainly are some out there)? I don't think so.

If the government seeks to prevent futures atrocities of this sort, perhaps additional funding into research on mental illness or money to mental health centers which participate in such research or at least further study would accomplish much.

The behavior "profile" of people like this murderer is more or less known. I DO NOT advocate rounding up every loner or anyone who has seen a doctor for depression or similar, but there must be distinct characteristics exhibited by someone about to become a monster. Remember that the Aurora shooter spent months planning his rampage. Surely during that time he exhibited some characteristic( s) which could have been spotted....and perhaps he could have been stopped.
 
 
+3 # Dion Giles 2012-07-24 20:36
Instead of rounding up every loner, why not round up every gun, then enact strict laws same as the rest of the world to govern the reissue of (single-shot only) firearms?

Pending this, the first time that the armed citizens bring down a drone launched to effect tyranny, or return withering fire at a “Kent State Uni” incident, will be the first time the “protection from government tyranny” excuse underpinning the Second Amendment (which was adopted to protect slave owners from slave insurrection) will show a sliver of validity. Currently the only effect is to give free rein to hoons who can’t enjoy the countryside without killing something or inadequate types who need to feel powerful.
 
 
-7 # jimattrell 2012-07-24 08:19
We need to arm everyone and train our children about gun safety like they do in Switzerland where gun crimes are non-existent. 66 million Americans with gun permits did not cause what happened in Colorado. Get a handgun, a license to use it, learn how to use it and when, then you'll be able to defend yourself and others if needed.
 
 
+5 # Feral Dogz 2012-07-24 10:39
The simple truth is that firearms give the shooter a sense of power; to kill at a distance, quickly and repeatedly. A maniac in body armor would not be deterred or easily stopped by gun toting citizens like George Zimmerman or you.
 
 
+3 # HowardMH 2012-07-24 10:57
It is all about the magazines stupid not the guns.

Who – Who – Who - needs a magazine that holds 20, 30, 50 or 100 shells?
 
 
+1 # panhead49 2012-07-24 15:30
Quoting HowardMH:
It is all about the magazines stupid not the guns.

Who – Who – Who - needs a magazine that holds 20, 30, 50 or 100 shells?



True dat! My .32 has a 9 round clip and the .22 rifle is single fire. There is no way in hell you will ever get more gun control laws passed - the smart money would go with doing something about these insane clips that are available. Time to take a look at why you can purchase 6k rounds on the internet too.
 
 
0 # rockieball 2012-07-26 04:31
Switzerland is not like the USA. Have you ever been their. I have. First because of their small population they have a mandatory training. But they are not allowed to keep or own handguns. They are allowed hunting rifles. All citizens are part of their National Guard. They do not have gun shows, or gun shops that sell every kind of gun from a handgun to an AK47 and 100 round ammo. What about Japan they have just as violent movies and video games and only 2 murders in 2006. England last year only 52. But once again they don't have gun stores, or gun shows where anyone can buy this crap. We should shut down the gun sows and make the guns shops have strict background checks and not allow any type of military weapon to be sold.
 
 
-3 # jwb110 2012-07-24 08:21
The Rifle Association is never going to let up on this. Given the fact that our National Guard is over seas perhaps markmen's ship should be taught in the schools and every citizen should be required to own a gun. In the Spirit of the 2nd Amendment we would reinstate our militias, provide for the common defense and scare the crap out of the good ol' boys who use this issue as a political football. Police attacking people because of their right to free assembly, bullies and brutes like the bought and sold police dept in Arizona might be more circumspect and all of Washington would be put on notice that the right to not have an imposed dictatorship was the reason for the 2nd Amendment in the first place. There will no gun control in the US because of the lobbies. That said, requiring that every citizen has a gun will at least level the playing field.
I wish that what I am saying is a joke but it isn't. It is just a solution to the lobbying and the NRA.
 
 
0 # rockieball 2012-07-26 04:35
In 1903 the term militia was changed to that of National Guard, they are one and the same. Also if you read the Constitution sure the 2nd A says in order to maintain a militia the right to beard arms will not be infringed on. But it also says in Article 1 section 8 that ONLY CONGRESS has the right to arm the militia. You have the right to bear arms but not the right to arm yourself.
 
 
+4 # MendoChuck 2012-07-24 08:49
You cannot keep asking people to just sit there and let these kinds of nut cases do what ever they want, whenever they want to.
The Supreme Court has already ruled that the Police do not have a duty to protect each citizen. Look it up if you do not believe that.
As you can see in each case the police are called and appear on the scene "after the fact" to make a report on the incident. It is not possible to have police everywhere at all times to protect everyone. Only you can accept that responsibility to protect yourself and your loved ones. No one else can do it for you.
 
 
+8 # James Marcus 2012-07-24 09:07
In Afghanistan, Pakistan, and more close-by neighbors than we know of, or care to admit...... the likes of This Horror ...is deliberately perpetrated daily;
In Your Name; With Your Dollars; Ordered By Your President; accomplished By Your Children
DAILY!
Perhaps the 'National Debate' should begin HERE?
 
 
-1 # jhankey 2012-07-24 15:30
The NRA, both honest and dishonest, are rumbling that the shooter was let into the theater. He was waiting outside an emergency exit, and someone let him in. He has all the appearances of a manchurian candidate - a la Sirhan. Whne Amy Goodman or anyone calls for gun control, more than anything they contribute to the impression that his was an operation by gun control advocates. It does seem to have been an operation. Did anyone notice that Bain, and Romney's Tax Returns are 4 words that have utterly evaporated from the national news discourse. Cheney and Bush Sr. LOVE Romney. Guess where he was on 9-11. Washington, discussing security with the head of the FBI. Just a helluva coincidence. During his first 10 years at Bain, Romney returned 173% each year to his investors, who are all CIA connected. Bernie Madoff is doing life for trying to return 10.5% on investments. Romney is a CIA money launderer of the 1st rank. And as such a war criminal, given what the CIA was doing in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Nicaragua with the money.
 
 
0 # skylinefirepest 2012-07-24 20:30
As usual McCarthy talks about gun violence instead of just plain violence. The weapon is just a tool. There are MILLIONS of AR based firearms privately owned in the U.S. and except for the RARE incident they are used for totally legal purposes. Now nobody wants to give me an answer to my question..."Wha t law would have stopped Mr. Holmes??" Since most of the anti gunners at RSN would have us believe that if Holmes had not had a semi-automatic rifle that he would not have hurt as many people as he did. Bull hockey! I had a policeman tell me ( unsubstantiated so far ) that this guy had thirty grenades in his apartment. Guys and girls he could have killed and maimed a whole bunch more people with them than he did with his rifle. Some politician stated that after his rifle jammed that he switched to a slower shooting semi-auto pistol. What??? Another BULL HOCKEY rating!! His high capacity magazine is what caused his rifle to jam...that's why the military no longer uses that style of mag known as a "c mag". If he had used the totally reliable 20 or 30 rounders he wouldn't have jammed! And don't forget, he was in a SHOOTING GALLERY that forbade law abiding citizens to carry!! Would you rather have someone shoot back at him and possibly stop him at the risk of hitting an unintended person or just simply have him shoot until he ran out of bullets or human targets????
 
 
-1 # pagrad 2012-07-25 07:41
As this article asks: “Are We Going to Wait for Another Massacre?” The answer is YES! -And there will be a big one.
The American public has not been taught to realize that there are civilizations where there in little violence, because guns are not permitted. Simple. The second amendment is a superstition. –A manufacturer’s moneymaker. During the Revolutionary War, soldiers took their rifles home; there were no barracks. Today, the military locks up their weapons. There is no need for the Second amendment.
 
 
0 # Ilyan 2012-07-26 02:04
Learn from the Swiss. Replace the Right to bear arms with a DUTY to be armed. Cut the nonsense about human rights and start talking about human duties.

Swiss men have to be armed until they are 50 and skilled in use or they lose their vote.

Stupid Lefties out to empower the Government by disarming the people should read Lenin: "There must be no standing Army or armed Police over the People, there must only be the people universally armed", Sensible Lefties have worked that out for themselves.

Swiss women let the side down a bit whe they were given the vote. They did not demand the same duties.

Grasshopper that idea to Afghanistsn and issue every woman there with a Smith and Wesson .38 chief's Special to hide under her Burkah. There is usable merit in the Sharia code if it is used prudently.

I wonder what the Revolutionary Association of Women of Afghanistan would make of that.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN