Marian Wright Edelman writes: "As a nation, we must aspire and act to become the world leader in protecting children against guns rather than leading the world in child victims of guns. Every child's life is sacred and it is long past time that we protect it."
The Trayvon Martin shooting raises questions about America's priorities when it comes to gun control. (photo: AP)
It's Past Time to Protect Children Not Guns
24 March 12
housands of people across the country have poured into the streets - from New York to Sanford, Florida - to demand justice for Trayvon Martin. Hundreds of thousands more stepped up to protest online. In response to the public outcry, the Sanford chief of police has temporarily stepped down and the state prosecutor has stepped aside. But nearly one month after 17-year-old Trayvon Martin was stopped, stalked, shot and killed while walking home from a convenience store, armed only with a bag of Skittles and a can of iced tea, his killer, George Zimmerman, has not been arrested. Today, the Children's Defense Fund released its new report, Protect Children, Not Guns 2012, dedicated to the memory of Trayvon Martin and the thousands of children and teenagers killed by guns in America, including the 5,740 children killed in 2008 and 2009 according to the latest data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Where is the outrage over every single one of the thousands of children and teens killed by guns - too many by gun slinging Americans unrestrained by common sense gun control laws. Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law, also known as the "shoot first, ask questions later" law, is now under national scrutiny. But will it and others be changed to protect children rather than gun owners and sellers?
April 16 marks the fifth anniversary of the Virginia Tech massacre where 32 students and faculty were killed by a gun, 25 others were injured, and many more were traumatized. Each year since then has seen gun victims - young children, teenagers, young adults, a member of Congress, a federal judge and many more. Days, weeks, months and years go by and little or nothing - except fleeting headlines, tears, trauma and talk - is done to protect children instead of guns.
- The 5,740 children and teens killed by guns in 2008 and 2009:
- Would fill more than 229 public school classrooms of 25 students each;
- Was greater than the number of U.S. military personnel killed in action in Iraq and Afghanistan (5,013).
- The number of preschoolers killed by guns in 2008 (88) and 2009 (85) was nearly double the number of law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty in 2008 (41) and 2009 (48).
- Black children and teens accounted for 45 percent of all child and teen gun deaths in 2008 and 2009 but were only 15 percent of the total child population.
- The leading cause of death among black teens ages 15 to 19 in 2008 and 2009 was gun homicide. For white teens 15 to 19 it was motor vehicle accidents followed by gun homicide (2008) and gun suicide (2009).
- Of the 116,385 children and teens killed by a gun since 1979 when gun data was first collected by age, 44,038 were black - nearly 13 times more than the number of recorded lynchings of black people of all ages in the 86 years from 1882 to 1968. But more white than black children and teens have died from gun violence which threatens all in America everywhere.
By any standards of human and moral decency, children in America are under assault, and by international standards, America remains the unchallenged world leader in children and teen gun deaths.
Analysis of the most recent data from 23 high-income countries reported that 87 percent of all firearm deaths of children under 15 were in the United States. The rate of U.S. gun homicides for teens and young adults 15 to 24 was 42.7 times higher than the overall gun homicide rate for that same age group in the other countries.
Why are common-sense gun regulations so shockingly absent in our country? Even in the wake of the Tucson tragedy and the near-fatal shooting of one of their own, Congress failed to act. Calls for banning high-volume ammunition clips and tightening up the federal background check system were ignored. Our leaders once again capitulated to the powerful gun lobby over the rights of children and citizens to life and safety. In November 2011, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act. If a similar bill is passed by the Senate and becomes law, a person with a permit to carry a concealed handgun in one state - a person like George Zimmerman in Sanford, Florida - could carry that concealed weapon in another state even if it was against the second state's law. Proponents of such dangerous laws maintain the fiction that guns promote personal safety. It is long past time to acknowledge gun violence as a hugely serious threat to children, teens, and overall public health and safety.
Our leaders in Washington, D.C. are not alone in refusing to make America safer. Forty-two states have adopted preemption laws to ensure state legislatures control of gun policy, impeding the ability of cities to develop local solutions to gun violence in their own communities. In 2011, Kansas, Mississippi and Utah enacted laws allowing concealed weapon permit holders to carry loaded, concealed firearms in or on the grounds of elementary and secondary schools. With all eyes on Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law, few noticed a law passed last year that, if upheld, threatens loss of a medical license for doctors who ask patients about whether a gun is in the home although it is not at all unusual or inappropriate for pediatricians particularly to ask patients and parents of patients about possible safety hazards in the home including guns.
We have so much work to do to build safe communities for our children. We need leaders at all levels of government who will protect children over guns. We need a relentless, powerful citizens' voice to break the gun lobby's veto on common sense gun policy. Our laws must control who can obtain firearms and close the gun show loophole, require consumer safety standards and childproof safety features for all guns, and strengthen child access prevention laws that ensure guns in the home are stored safely and securely. And all must take action and ask political candidates this fall what steps they will take to protect children from guns. We must remove guns from our homes where children so often find them and put themselves and others in harm's way and combat cultural glorification of guns and violence. As a nation, we must aspire and act to become the world leader in protecting children against guns rather than leading the world in child victims of guns. Every child's life is sacred and it is long past time that we protect it.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Of those 5,740 children killed, how many were killed by the 11th+ bullet? What effect would banning normal magazines have on that? How many were killed by the mythical 'assault rifle'?
Clearly, guns save more lives than they take. All you have to do is look at the research.
The Brady bunch argued that allowing concealed handgun would create a blood bath. Now they try to claim there is no evidence that they lowered crime.
Actually, I and most gun owners would quickly agree to pretty much any restriction you want - proved we agree that they will be the last restriction proposed. If it doesn't help, tough. Don't come back and try to say if we required drug testing, limited magazines to 2 rounds, etc. it would save lives.
You would never agree to that would you? It's obvious that any 'reasonable regulation' you propose is simply an interim step along a path to come confiscation/elimination.
You can dance in the blood of these children all you want but the facts are concealed handguns (and licensing) has been a tremendous success and saved lives.
Yes, for the NRA, guns manufacturers and blood thirsty individuals.
Without gun in hand a person can not shoot and kill.
The expression "You can dance in the blood of these children all you want.." is totally appalling yet not surprising.
Parents of all children killed by guns in the US at schools, at homes and on the streets, playgrounds etc should bring a class action law suit against the NRA and shoud be supported by the American Academy of Pediatrics.
If the US government even tried to ban all guns, they'd guarantee that we would have extreme right wing Republican governments from now until eternity. How would you like that?
Get rid of every single gun in this country, and those who wish to kill or maim, will find a way. They always do. Always have. Check out the number of stabbings in Great Britain. I'll bet every person posting here can name an object that can kill or maim other than guns.
It is the society that is deteriorating. How can that be fixed? It can't.
Strange how my grandfather and his classmates could keep shotguns and ammo in their lockers without shooting each other, hm?
Really? What about the 99.99+% kids who are never shot, shot at, or otherwise harmed or endangered by guns?
"Why are common-sense gun regulations so shockingly absent in our country? "
People have woken up to the nightmarish reality of totalitarianism .
"Calls for banning high-volume ammunition clips"
The bill that was introduced would have potentially made felons out of 1/2 the country. We have the world's largest prison population, multiplying it by fifty times isn't even possible.
"few noticed a law passed last year that, if upheld, threatens loss of a medical license for doctors who ask patients about whether a gun is in the home"
Few noticed? I distinctly remember a huge national uproar about it.
"We need a relentless, powerful citizens' voice to break the gun lobby's veto on common sense gun policy."
I am the gun lobby, and NO. You lose, we win, go cry in your glass of blood.
From 2008-2009, for children aged 3-5: There were 66 firearm homicides, 34 accidental firearm deaths, 37 killed by falling, 77 killed by suffocation, 242 killed by fire, 344 died by drowning, and 548 killed in car crashes. Your pre-schooler is many times more likely to die in your swimming pool or your car than they are because of guns.
Debating the morality and legality of that is obviously futile as we have different views. Perhaps though you could explain practically how you would actually accomplish disarming the largest and best armed group of people in the world? I won't cooperate. Heck, I'll actively resist along with tens of millions of other Americans, many of whom are the cops and military who would in theory be the ones enforcing your totalitarian regime. So how is that going to work for you when your minions are outnumbered and outgunned?
Want to see something else interesting? Compare the rate of burglaries in the US and UK that occur when the resident is present.
The phrase is "conservative estimates" not "conservatives estimate." One estimate to which I am referring was done as part of the National Crime Victimization Survey, performed by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Please look it up and reply back here if you've found a flaw in their methodology that causes them to overestimate the number of annual DGUs.
Gotcha.
True. Guns aren't magical talismans that ward off evil. It's difficult to stop a madman bent on hurting others, whether that madman has a gun, bomb, homemade flame-thrower, or a car. But most criminals, even the violent ones, are not madmen. They're fairly rational, they do a risk/benefit analysis of the crime they're about to commit. They don't want to get caught or killed.
Quoting ABen:
Without invasive searches of everyone entering the building, there's no way to be sure of that. Of course, such searches do nothing to protect people immediately outside the school doors.
And let's not overlook the fact that gun laws across the US are not uniform. How are restrictive gun laws working out for D.C., NYC, and Chicago?
RSS feed for comments to this post