Cole writes: "It is legitimate to criticize Muslim organizations and parties, and to work against violent groups like al-Qaeda. But al-Qaeda is a tiny fringe religious-nationalist movement..."
Women stand outside the Sikh Temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, 08/06/12. (photo: Jeffrey Phelps/AP)
White Terrorism at Oak Creek
06 August 12
e still have only rumors about Wade Michael Page, the gunman who walked into a Sikh Temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin near Milwaukee and opened fire with a semi-automatic weapon (weapons that should be illegal) on men women and children beginning to gather for a day of worship, singing and feasting. He killed 6 Americans and critically wounded 3 others, including a Wisconsin policeman kneeling to help one of the Sikh victims. Others were more lightly wounded and went to ordinary hospitals rather than to the trauma unit.
Page is said to have served in the military, discharged for misconduct in 1998.
He is said to have had a 9/11 tattoo.
He was in a white supremacist punk band, "End Apathy."
He likely thought he was targeting American Muslims. He operated in an atmosphere of virulent hate speech against American Muslims. A discourse of Islamophobia has plagued the United States in the past decade, pushed by unscrupulous bigots in public life and by entire media organizations such as Fox Cable News and other media properties of billionaire yellow press lord Rupert Murdoch. Among them is also Rush Limbaugh, who, incredibly, is still broadcast to US soldiers abroad.
Among the hatemongers are Frank Gaffney, and his acolyte Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn), Rep. Peter King (R-NY) Daniel Pipes, James Woolsey, Robert Spencer, Steve Emerson, John Bolton, and sometimes Rudi Giuliani, Mike Huckabee and others, most associated with the Republican Party. The push for hate speech against American Muslims is funded by a small group of billionaires through their foundations. Some of the Muslim-haters are connected to the US arms industry and are hoping for profits from further wars in the Middle East. Others are Israel-firster fanatics. Others are looking for a bogey man to scare Americans with, so as to convince them to vote against their interests, as they used Communism during the Cold War to convince ordinary Americans to give up their constitutional rights.
It is legitimate to criticize Muslim organizations and parties, and to work against violent groups like al-Qaeda. But al-Qaeda is a tiny fringe religious-nationalist movement; far fewer Muslims have been involved in it than white southerners have been involved in the Ku Klux Klan. Nevertheless, American politicians at least implicitly attempted to tar all Muslims with its brush. Like anti-Semitism, racist anti-Muslim discourse has illegitimate properties. It shouldn't be acceptable to attribute to Muslims a vast general conspiracy. It shouldn't be acceptable to assert that they are all dishonest and lying about their real beliefs. It shouldn't be acceptable to lie and allege that they believe in casually murdering non-Muslims. Their religious law, or sharia, shouldn't be demonized more than the Talmud or Roman Catholic canon law. It shouldn't be acceptable to accuse them all of waging jihad or holy war.
Since many in the hate-the-Muslims network are closely associated with the campaign of Mitt Romney, reporters should ask Romney again whether he is willing to repudiate this kind of hate speech.
As in Norway, where the Muslim-hating network (fostered also by hateful web sites like "Gates of Vienna," "Elders of Ziyon," and a host of others) deeply influenced mass murderer Anders Breivik, so in the United States the purveying of a negative image of Muslims predictably has resulted in violence. In Norway, Breivik targeted what he called liberals soft on the alleged Muslim menace. In the US, Wade targeted people he thought looked like Muslims, the Sikhs. (Actually I don't know any American Muslims who wear turbans, as observant Sikh men do, but Hollywood stereotypes die hard). As always, hatemongering never only affects the objects of hatred. It distorts and wounds the people who promote it, and it usually spills over onto society in general. Neoconservative anti-Muslim bigots are usually indirectly also promoting anti-Semitism in the long term.
Did Michele Bachmann, Peter King, Daniel Pipes and the others cause the Wisconsin shootings? No. Did they create an intellectual and cultural atmosphere that naturalized such violence against the supposed Other? Well, Bachmann publicly alleged that a minor aide to Hillary Clinton of Pakistani heritage is at the center of a vast infiltration of the American government by the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. You decide.
The image emerging of Page is emblematic of America in the past decade and a half. We are a violent country infested by dangerous semi-automatic weapons. Not only do we have far more murders, and especially murders by firearm, than other societies with advanced economies, but we launch far more wars than other such countries, and spend more than the next 20 advanced countries combined on our war industry. The mindset of frontier warriors taming the encircling savages, which goes back to early American history and, later, the legends of the Old West, informs both domestic attitudes and foreign policy. George W. Bush actually talked about the "romance" of fighting the Pushtuns of Afghanistan.
The US mass media suspected that the shooter actually intended to massacre Muslims, and some unfortunately referred to the temple attendees as "innocent," as though a mosque congregation would not have been equally innocent.
Sikhism is a north Indian religion that began with ecstatic worship of a generally monotheistic sort some 500 years ago in India. It is an independent religion whose adherents say its scriptures are divinely revealed. As a historian I'm bound to say that it grows out of the cultural mix of Hinduism, Bhakti (ecstatic popular worship), and Sufi Islam (Muslim mysticism) of Mughal India in the early modern period). It is specially associated with the Punjab region of India (and what is now Pakistan). Sikhs say there are some half a million adherents in the United States, though sociologists assert that the figure is more like 100,000. Sikhs are just wonderful people, and a person's heart is shredded at the idea of this horrible atrocity committed against them.
Sikhs have tall too often been targeted by perpetrators of hate crimes in the US.
The characteristics rumored of the shooter mirror the worst of America in the Bush era and after. The Muslim-hating political discourse, already discussed, was pioneered by Karl Rove in 2006.
As for a mistaken target, the United States government attacked Iraq in 2003 after an insidious propaganda campaign that falsely attributed the September 11, 2001 attacks to the government of Saddam Hussein (a conspiracy theory pushed with special ferocity by then Undersecretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, other Neoconservatives tied to the Israeli right wing, and by vice president Dick Cheney). There was never any credible evidence linking Iraq to 9/11 and I said so repeatedly and publicly in 2002 and early 2003. In fact, al-Qaeda was fostered in the 1980s by the United States and its regional allies as a way of pushing the Soviet Union out of Afghanistan.
Paranoid "revenge" on Iraq to the extent that some US soldiers in the illegal invasion actually wore pictures of the Twin Towers, the building destroyed by the al-Qaeda hijackers, on their backpacks. I showed in my Engaging the Muslim World that in fact Saddam Hussein was afraid of al-Qaeda and had put out an all points bulletin for a suspected al-Qaeda operative who was rumored to be in Iraq in summer of 2002.
The crazed US invasion of Iraq set off social turmoil that has left tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of Iraqis dead and the country still a basket case nine years later. Thousands of Americans were plunged into a quixotic attempt to occupy an Arab Muslim country, forced in many cases into acts of brutality against Iraqi civilians that continue to haunt them. Large numbers of Americans who served in Iraq suffer Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. As the fruitless war ground on, the US army became desperate for recruits, and allegedly increasingly let in members of biker gangs and criminal elements, latter-day Pages. It is horrible to contemplate that our own government, which is terrified of a few Occupy Wall Street hippies, happily gave advanced weapons training and battlefield experience to criminals and white supremacists so as to put down the Iraqi resistance to foreign occupation.
The violence, hatred, paranoia and racism that courses in the subterranean depths of the American psyche has played out on the world stage in the past decade, but also in countless small acts of bigotry and maliciousness at home, as with Rep. Peter King's hearings on the alleged radicalization of the American Muslim community (an IRA supporter himself, has he had any hearings on the radicalization of white people?) and the campaigns by Evangelical politicians to condemn Muslim canon law or sharia or to prevent Muslims from building mosques and worshiping freely.
That we are all victims of this campaign of hate is eloquently underlined by what happened at Oak Creek.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
To put the names of Lenin and Stalin together as you do suggests to me that you have read nor understand either of them. To be clear, i am neither a Stalinist nor a Leninist and never have been but there is a world of difference between what Lenin wrote (and practiced) and what Stalin wrote (though most of his "theoretical" works are believed to have been penned by others) and practiced. At the end of his life, after his strokes and so he was no longer a force in the Soviet Government, Lenin returned to his earlier calls for "all power to the soviets", called for a multi-party system with free elections and warned about turning the reigns of power over to any one individual (whether it was Stalin or Trotsky). He warned about the bureacuratizati on of the new Soviet State which is why he said that power had to be devolved back down to the people at the local level as socialism had promised. All of this can be read in the last 3 pieces that Lenin wrote (and which were supressed by Stalin and not seen until after his death).
Does anyone remember the Ku Klux Klan? Undoubtedly they hate "Muslims", never minding that Islam is a faith and not a race, along with all of their other traditional targets.
they hate anyone they perceive to b e not like them ...
But these are the known Haters, there are just as much Hatred in Churches, Temples It is a Human Condition that is eating us alive like Syphillis does Brain just has no room to rethink Humane, Peace.
Calling it CONSERVATIVE terrorism DOES.
Of course, since the victims were Islamic you won't hear much about this being called "terrorism" on tv.
My mistake was accidental. Your mistake was bigotry.
I read Skanner's post and didn't think he was being a bigot.
According to this web site:
http://www.sikhnet.com/news/sufi-and-sikh
The two are not all that different.
Nonsense. Sufism is an [admirable] offshoot of Islam (greatly despised by radical conservative Wahadi (Saudi) Islam by the way.
Sikhism was an attempt to bridge differences between Hinduism and Ondian Islam by Guru Nanak.
To understand some of the current divide between Islam and Sikhism, you might want to read 'Last Train To Pakistan' by Khushwant Singh on the Colonial British self-interested precipitous division of India and its consequences for Sikhs (and Muslims) during partition... .
http://www.diffen.com/difference/Islam_vs_Sikhism
Here is a fragment of a Rumi poem:
Be empty of worrying.
Think of who created thought!
Why do you stay in prison
when the door is so wide open?
Move outside the tangle of fear-thinking.
Live in silence.
Flow down and down in always
widening rings of being.
Billy Bob, I agree with you that this is conservative terrorism -- though I hate to see the conservatism of, say Teddy Roosevelt, linked to such degenerates as Bachmann, King, Rove and Murdoch.
I can't see how, after reading Cole's article, you can believe that Sikhs are Islamic, but I take your point: terrorists in the mindset of our mega-buck media wear beards and turbans, have dark skins, don't worship the Judeo-Christian god, and generally march to a different drummer.
If, however, the psychopath who blows away a federal building, a school, a movie theater or a house of worship happens to be white, why he's not a terrorist, he's just a guy who went postal and the neighbors simply can't understand how it happened. "He was such a good boy."
I may be wrong. It doesn't really change the point I was making either way.
Sufism is more closely connected to Hindu religion.
Lots of Terrorists in America and everywhere else. Man Loves Killing
Meanwhile, might I recommend matching, beautifully tailored Kevlar jackets and slacks for those trips to the store, office, factory, theater, school, mall, church, mosque, political rally . . . ?
Yeah, Wayne!!
Mr. Cole you told it like it is ! Those you named and the christian right and their pastors who rev up the bigotry and hate meter are responsible for this atmosphere of hate and bigotry that feeds the minds of these terrorists that commit these murders !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYCurbSAsd4&feature=player_embedded
too much smoke and too many quacking sounds if ya ask me.
Again...Sadly brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department Department.
Calling it "terrorism" serves the purpose of asking what the definition of terrorism actually is. I also think the guy who shot Giffords was a terrorist, as was timothy mcveigh.
There's a blurry line of distinction between "war", "terrorism", and "murder". That line is too often defined by people with a specific political agenda to mold and manipulate the opinions of the general public.
That's why we refer to the rebels trying to oust the U.S. military from Iraq and Afghanistan as "insurgents". There are too many positive connotations to the word "rebel" in the conservative American mindset. So, they've been avoided with a euphemism.
The language used in these situations is always applied very selectively. I like the idea of calling this a terrorist act, because it puts a mirror in front of people who are just a little too confident in their own self-righteousn ess.
Divine Barry will not let the Fort Hood massacre be called a terrorist action. Workplace violence.
If a federal law is violated, this will give the federal government jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute as opposed to the local and state government.
The hate is everywhere against Muslims - Rove & Company's campaign has borne bitter fruit.
Stores have been boycotted for carrying Halal-labeled foods. Halal Coleman products at Costco.
Muslim groups are subject to additional conditions than other groups if attempting to hold events at theme parks like Great America. Muslim Unity Day at Great America
They are not angels, and have some cults of their own including the militant one who managed to kill Indira Gandhi...) BUT in no way did they deserve to ber targeted and attacked by mindless "Christian" white supremacist zealots, like the poor Sikh in Arizona 'mistaken' for a Muslim. [Nor shoudl Muslims, Jews or Sikhs et al be targeted in any way for their DIFFERENT RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.
These white supremacists are colossally ingorant, and easily lead by Rovian tactics and big-mouthed liars likle Rush L. and Faux "News" ... .
Nuremberg!
Muslims like the Jews and Christians are Human, Holy Book similar. They all have revenge underlined. But not all Muslims are evil. I believe bunching them in a category is not any way to get moving on Peace.
I believe People should integrate in Faith and Culture. However, man will always find someone to scorn, ridicule and hate...what else would those with Hate in their Hearts do. Want to give me a clue?
Sikhs are monotheists and the object venerated at the center of their temple is their book of holy law, similar to the Jewish veneration of the Torah. We should regard these people as friends and allies and not confuse them with our enemies!
Well, the ADL cite in its mission statement that “…its ultimate purpose is to secure justice and fair treatment to all citizens alike and to put an end forever to unjust and unfair discrimination against and ridicule of any sect or body of citizens…”.
It is, therefore, a challenge to reconcile these fine words with Israel’s policies of administrative detention and Gaza apartheid, along with its redacted take on the UN Human Rights Charter.
Perhaps the ADL should re-write its mission statement along the lines of “…all men are born equal, but some are born more equal than others…”.
Sprituality is the search for knowledge and enlightenment.
Religion is the search for reward.
As an American Indian whose people were almost decimated by bigoted white American citizens,I feel the pain & the humiliation that those targeted must feel when painted by such a large, ugly, brush of hate. It is particularly galling when an elected US official (ala M. Bachman) is the spewer of this poisonous hate. It is expected by the likes of con men & showmen for money like Beck or Limbaugh, but when a representative of the government is the catalyst for this behavior it makes me doubly ill. What is wrong with the voters of Bachmans district? Do all of them actually agree with this purveyor of filth? Do they actually believe the nonsensical garbage that spits out of her mouth?
I hope that somehow, Muslim people realize that far from all Americans join in on the hate parade. This is/was the United Staes of America, the supposed melting pot. "Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free." No doubt these bigots would like to see that wonderful inscription erased.
Everyone is a Heathen...live with it.
I have never met so many bigots as I see on blogs. They believe themselves not to be.
No one is White. Religion was formed to keep the Masses in Control.
Every single one of the 17 greedy old men who are pulling the eco-politico strings these days belong to this club. Which, to my mind, is a soft-sell version of the Ku Klux Klan. And...
White males covet the ability to have UNFAIR leverage against and OVER all other races, and this includes women (remember the famous announcement several years from the Christian Coalition of Southern Baptist Churches? That they had "taken a vote and decided that ALL women shall submit to the men."?) This is how white males of the Right-wing persuasion roll. Have a look at Sheriff Arpaio for a working model of said same.
The problem for the country is, weak minded people who need authoritarian figures are attracted to all of this posturing, hate mongering, rhetoric but don't have the common sense to realize it is wrong and not to get involved.
I live in the south and I find this particularly true of Bible states. They have been taught that this skin-head attitude is manly and godly.
I found that in New England, women were not put on pedestals but appreciated for the work they did. My Family had regard for women, no abuse in immediate.
But the hate came here on the boats, as it was in many countries of Europe and the Middle East, East, Africa. It follows us and weighs us down.
I made the comment that this person is a terrorist and a right-wing one at that. You'd think that, given the fact that most of the readers of this article are probably left-wing, there would be some agreement with me - at least for the intention of what I said, even if one disagrees with one of the details of my comment.
I find it interesting that the whole conversation broke down into an argument about comparative religion with everyone attacking everyone else. I consider this a huge problem. I honestly don't think it's possible for any left-winger to or moderate to represent the left in this country. This is why 3rd parties are a false panacaea. We are so busy tearing each other apart over details and what we think are the hidden intentions of other anonymous people commenting on the internet that we lose sight of the very real danger our country is in from a right-wing fringe that is cohesive, well organized, and able to get along within it's own ranks. It’s authoritarian, afterall.
I apologize for calling Sichs Muslims as though they were a sect of Islam rather than another Middle-Eastern religion that considers itself closely related to Sufism (an Islamic sect).
That doesn't mean I agree with the terrorist. If you read my original comment that would be obvious.
CONT.
It may not exactly be "nitpicking" but it does seem like these conversations often lose sight of the forest for the trees.
I've noticed lately that, unless you're against gun control, there's a pretty good chance you won't even bother to comment on a thread that concerns that issue. The anti-gun control folks have completely dominated those threads and made it impossible to get a word in. They don't care how many thumbs down they get for it, just so long as no one else chimes in. And not as many people bother to.
I've also noticed lately the amount of arguing everyone does over every little detail that might have been overlooked or incorrectly stated by someone else they basically agree with. If you accidentally cut someone off on the road, and they run you off the road and put a gun to your head, the last thing you expect is your spouse taking their side, because afterall, you did cut them off. In other words, with political alies like this, who needs Karl Rove?
I hate to say it, but I hope none of us is ever on a sinking ship with a bunch of liberals (sorry, "PROGRESSIVES", “liberal” is a naughty word). As the ship is sinking, rather than saving each other we'll be arguing over who's fault it was, or what really caused it.
Once again, I apologize for any of my opinions that have offended anybody. But, this is getting tiresome.
You point many fingers BB, as if some resolve is even possible here...I find the back and forth stimulating to some degree, informative and a great reflection for clarifying my own points of view...
Considering we have COMPLETELY changed our culture since 2001, and what we seem to be fearing is some idea from a bunch of 8th cnetury believers in their specific cause.
(cont)
I think this take makes much sense:
The world's largest army... America 's hunters!
I had never thought about this...
A blogger added up the deer license sales in just a handful of states and arrived at a striking conclusion:
There were over 600,000 hunters this season in the state of Wisconsin.
>
Allow me to restate that number:
Over the last several months, Wisconsin's hunters became the eighth largest army in the world. More men under arms than in Iran . More than France and Germany combined.
>
These men deployed to the woods of a single American state, Wisconsin, to hunt with firearms, and no one was killed.
>
That number pales in comparison to the 750,000 who hunted the woods of Pennsylvania and Michigan's 700,000 hunters, all of whom have now returned home safely. Toss in a quarter million hunters in West Virginia and it literally establishes the fact that the hunters of those four states alone would comprise the largest army in the world.
>
And then add in the total number of hunters in the other 46 states. It's millions more.
The point?
America will forever be safe from foreign invasion with that kind of home-grown firepower Hunting....
it's not just a way to fill the freezer..It's a matter of national security.
I just don't see that WETHEPEOPLE are participating in a sane exchange of our freedoms for all this insane and oppressive implementation of 'security'.
The Movement of 60's and 70's took a different road, Media got bored. Whites, Blacks, Hispanics were getting along, and Asian Culture was getting blamed for gangs, drugs because we needed Heathen Group.
Then influx of Indian, Pakistan, Afghanistan culture comes here and new hatred is born. They come buy our stores etc so the gossip starts. Many of those who came were Christian but that was not important...the y were different than us. They all live together, etc.
Then Bush/Cheney group needed something big so they got 9/11. Now new group arises....Al Qaeda. What a glorious day for the Media and of course the Rethugs. Someone to blame, someone to stir up new hatred. Now we can fester the old hatred of blacks up, Hispanic culture, now we have Middle East also.
Sad thing is I cannot tell the Middle Eastern from Pakistanian or Jewish Person. They all look the same, they all act a bit different than we do. Again they all clan up together...prob ably for safety.
Al Qaeda...we needed them, they fueled a fire that was ebbing away with everyone working, going places. Let us thank the Bush's for the Fuel along with Media. Most of you would not know the difference either
Back in the 70s there was a lot of writing about the psychopathology of racism. Race hatred was seen as a mental disorder particularly afflicting whites, mostly for cultural reasons. Since the 70s we've started to think that all psychopathologi es are organic rather than cultural. Too bad. Now it is harder to understand the hatred that many whites have for all other cultures.
"White psychopath kills innocent Sikhs." No news here. That happens many times every day. Whites kill others every day.
WHY ARE THEY ALL MALES AND, IN THIS COUNTRY, PRIMARILY WHITE MALES? ANSWERING THOSE QUESTIONS IS THE BEGINNING OF UNDERSTANDING WHY SUCH EVENTS OCCUR.
http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/notorious_murders/women/index.html
http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/notorious_murders/mass/female_mass_murderer/1.html
maybe the rest are just "better" and smarter than the rest and haven't been caught?
RSS feed for comments to this post