Intro: "Rahm Emanuel wants to cheapen education to make it conform to a standardized testing model. So how about we come up with standardized testing models to see how our do-nothing politicians measure up?"
Elected officials should take standardized tests. (photo illustration: DonkeyHotey/Esquire, The Politics Blog (Based on Images from the AP))
Standardized Testing for Elected Officials
14 September 12
Reader Supported News | Perspective
ahm Emanuel wants to cheapen education to make it conform to a standardized testing model. So how about we come up with standardized testing models to see how our do-nothing politicians measure up?
As long as do-nothing legislators demand teachers be held accountable to their approved version of a standardized test, all elected officials, from city council members and boards of selectmen, to mayors and state legislators, to members of the U.S. House and Senate and the presidency, should be held accountable to a citizens' standardized test drafted by all of us. We'll measure them on job growth, the rank of our education and healthcare systems, the ratio between rises in the cost of living as opposed to wage increases, the ratio between money spent on wars overseas as opposed to money spent on domestic services, the ratio spent on public school students as opposed to prisoners, CO2 emissions, air and water quality, taxes collected from those who owe, and job approval ratings, for starters.
According to the standardized test we just drafted, all members of Congress would immediately be ineligible for re-election, as they have held as low as a 9% approval rating in the last year, and job growth has slowed to a trickle largely due to Congress's failure to act on job creation bills, like the American Jobs Act in fall of 2011. And seeing as our Pentagon budget has surpassed $700 billion, which greatly surpasses the money spent by Uncle Sam on environmental protection, education and job training, Congress gets a big fat F in the spending category. They would also unequivocally fail in the CO2 emissions category because of their failure to address climate change, deny a cap-and-trade program, and move forward with the disastrous Keystone XL pipeline project.
Any state government that has ignored revising their tax code to crack down on individual and corporate tax dodgers in favor of cutting budgets for education and other public programs across the board is thus failing in the categories of job creation, tax collection, domestic spending, and education rankings. To really boost their grades, they would have to shift the tax burden from the poor and middle class to the wealthy, properly fund schools and public health programs, and allocate more dollars to public transportation to encourage hiring on things like rail projects. Environmental grades and job creation grades could be boosted as well by allocating money for making homes and buildings more energy-efficient.
If legislators wanted to boost their grades in CO2 emissions and water/air quality, they would have to cease fracking operations that pollute water supplies and coal mining practices that pollute the air, and replace those forms of energy with more sustainable means like solar, wind, geothermal, and hydroelectric power. If state lawmakers want their job approval ratings to go up, they should see to it that more money is spent on students, and less on prisons. An easy way to manage that would be to decriminalize or legalize marijuana.
You know, this standardized testing thing for legislators seems like a great way for us to hold them accountable, and a great way for them to stay elected by making sure they pass the test. Just like we do with school students, we'll administer the test each year. Except instead of giving the test in the Spring, we'll give the test one week before election day. And any elected official who gets an F on the citizens' standardized test shouldn't be re-elected.
Keep up with US Uncut!
Web: usuncut.org
Twitter: twitter.com/usuncut
FB: http://www.facebook.com/usauncut
Carl Gibson, 25, is co-founder of US Uncut, a nationwide creative direct-action movement that mobilized tens of thousands of activists against corporate tax avoidance and budget cuts in the months leading up to the Occupy Wall Street movement. Carl and other US Uncut activists are featured in the documentary "We're Not Broke," which premiered at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival. He currently lives in Manchester, New Hampshire. You can contact Carl at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it , and listen to his online radio talk show, Swag The Dog, at blogtalkradio.com/swag-the-dog.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
No kidding ! I saw the interview and came to a similar conclusion. We need standardized testing before these "low information" candidates ever qualify to be placed on a ballot.
This joke is no longer funny.
Todd Aiken on the SCIENCE committee?
Michele Bachmann on the INTELLIGENCE committee ?
Sarah Palin ANYWHERE ?
That Federal Govt is trying to institute standardized testing for students is simply a "dodge" to allow them to take over educational criteria. To discourage studies such as civics, history, *any* kind of critical thinking, etc, which are *already* being eliminated in so many public school programs. google what Sandra Day O'Connor is up to these days.
That makes for a much more docile voting public. "Teaching to the Test" is simply "brainwashing" made easy. And any teacher uncomfortable *becoming* an automaton for govt brainwashing needs to be fired as incompetent. Right ?
We, as a nation, have been so badly "dumbed-down" already, that these incredibly transparent takeovers actually have a very good chance of fully succeeding.
"Good night, and good luck."
This joke is no longer funny.
Todd Aiken on the SCIENCE committee?
Michele Bachmann on the INTELLIGENCE committee ?
Sarah Palin ANYWHERE ?
A wonderful idea. Reminds me of the lifelong attempt to create an other branch of government called "Department of Peace"
Opposite to the Department of War, now changed to Defense Department.
This would assure us a real Balance of Power. If nothing else, it would counter balance the hawks and the military private enterprises, suppliers of weapons of mass destruction. Be reminded that this industry is huge, employs thousands, and is the second largest manufacturer of these weapons in the world. Perhaps this would enable real and honest discussion with transparency. I wonder how many of our "experts" would pass any test in these areas. I also wonder how, under this scenario, the public would vote.
I am afraid a standardized intelligence test for many already in power including those at the very top would make them ineligible for their offices.
I expect many dislikes - go figure ! Maybe a standardized test for readers of this blog is in order
Your comment about a test for those in power "including those at the very top" would appear to many to be refering to Obama. Were you refering to Bush? Myself and other readers woud have to question your wisdom if you cannot recognise the difference in the intelligence of these 2 presidents. Which takes us back to the first comment I made about the electorate...
A standardized test is used to test what you have learned and are EXPECTED to know at the end of the year!
It is NOT something "sprung" on you by surprise!
If you want to test, then use the teacher model.
Tell them when they get elected what they must do to be eligible for re-election!
Thats the point. Obviously, under the standard testing model of government, each incumbant would be aware of the requirements of the job. For the NEXT election cycle, anyone running for reelection would be rated mainly on critical items such as job growth in his district. Reps. from many western state districts where the air is claen, may not be rated as highly on air pollution standards. Extra credit would always be given to any legislator that has a large number of constituents that enlist in our military, making that Congressperson an honorary hero.
The real point, is that rating elected officials on a standardized test is ALMOST as moronic as evaluating teachers by a standardized. And the absolute worst evaluation you can that impose on children is the horror of standardized, borg creating, individuality stifling, creativity crushing, initiative caging, standardized testing. Other than that its a wonderful idea that I completely endorse.
This is not rocket science, do your kids know what you were supposed to teach them, yes you keep your job, no then you get retrained and if you still can't teach you get fired!
You test the kids on day 1 and periodically throughout the year if you don't then you are only guessing that they are on the right track.
So simple even a liberal should understand!
Edge, you are so very correct. It is so simple only a Liberal would understand. Whoops, I added a word. How very noncomformist of me.
Predictable and standardized comment from a blinkered status-quo supporter.
Standardized testing is for weeding the out creative, questioning and analytical minds from the sheep, which is what the Plutocrats in charge of the new-slave Corporate State crave.
I have a friend who was head of a large, national, non-profit, examination evaluation group and who had to go to D.C. continuously to deal with the "No child left behind" (or as Greg Palast put it, "No Child's behind left") effects on mostly public education post-Dimwits "selection". He eventually despaired for the future of the schools subjected to this democratically unworkable, blinkered (Yep', there's that word again) and inflexible scheme from the hard core administration an idiot who couldn't hold a used car salesman's job but for his daddy's connections and a dumbed-down electorate (cause and effect illustrated here) and took early retirement, so blocked and hampered was he was in trying to challenge N.C.L.B.
But don't worry; this scenario, fun and imaginative as it is, will never threaten y'r heroes in the status-quo.
Sometimes my idiot-level typing skills are embarrassing: "Mea-culpa, mea maxima culpa" (genuflects on well-worn knees to the Gods of the English language).
It makes no sense to elected ignoramuses like Bush to high office, when the means of identifying them is so simple. Any elected official should demonstrate some kind of minimal grasp of geography, history, economics, and the natural sciences. I would further advocate that their answers, right and wrong, be published so that voters can then decide whether they want intellectually competent or incompetent leadership on an objective, empirical basis.
In the event that "NOTA" received a plurality of the popular vote, the election would be invalidated and new candidates would have to be nominated.
None of the then current candidates would be eligible to run, serve or to vote again within the current election cycle. A minimum of at least one election cycle (2 years for Representative, 4 years for President, 6 years for Senator ...) for the office in question would have to pass before they could again stand for public office
A journalist for Al Jezeera English asked a Ohio Republican state representative a daring question. "Why do you think women have abortions." Republican Jim Bucky replied, "I never really thought about it." If our own journalistic professionals can't or won't ask the obvious questions then we will never know what our political representatives really think of us or the policies they put forth.
How many digits are there in a trillion?
How many digits are there in the population of the United States?
How many digits are there in the number of people in the top 1% of the population of the United States?
What is a budget deficit?
What is Inflation?
What is meant by the National Debt?
What is the Voting Rights Act?
Anyone who votes for an American Republican Party candidate is not thinking rationally and not logically. Such a person is not just misguided; they have not received a credible education. In doing so, they are actually dangerous. What should be done with someone who actually endorses Treason?
I used to think that such an act is just a misjudgment or a poor opinion. Not so, these folks are putting the rest of society in danger. A convicted criminal is isolated and put in prison so that they will no longer harm other people. What should be done with individuals who advocate the destruction of our cities and our country?
One just has listen to the nonsense platitudes and irrational statements of these Republicans. If permitted, I can easily show their statements to be irrational. In the meantime, uneducated citizens are easily convinced that truth is being expressed.
The American Republican candidate for President has publicly stated that he prays several times a day. There is no way that this may be proven. However, how can the American public support someone who exposes to lead a nation, based on superstition and unsupported ‘faith’, rather than actuality and facts?
So the Dems are so friggin' smart that one of their fold in Congress asked if they could take the MARS ROVER to see the flag placed on the Moon by Armstrong!!!
Wow that is Real stupid and that can't be fixed!
Not to mention that it was Democratic Congresswoman Clarke who told Colbert that there was still Dutch slavery in Brooklyn in 1898 so clearly there is enough stupidity to go around in both parties....sadl y, the republicans do not have a monopoly on this one.
And while we are at it, let's also demand they submit to drug testing as Florida Governor Rick Scott has mandated for state employees. (And by the way, he is invested in a drug testing business).
Intelligent experts in education have repeatedly advised that standardized testing is completely unreliable, but our politicians seem to love it. Let them, therefore, be tested too!
But sorry, no extra help classes for Congressmen!
Sadly, these folks are vetted by their corporate "godfathers" who pay for their multimillion dollar ads. These expect results for their investment. Our vote merely "chooses" (or is that *ratifies*?) between finalist Candidate a or Candidate b.
Till we seriously reform our campaign-fundin g laws and enact public finance of campaigns, we will not move from this checkmate position and corporations will always gain a majority in the majority of legislatures.
Yes, these guys may, in the main, be tools, but they're *pro-corporatio n* tools...
The only solution is to shut the whole thing down and start over. The US regime cannot be fixed or amended. It is way too corrupt for that. We need to be thinking of new political structures and just let go of the Washinton regime. The new stuctures will be much more local or even regional. They will not have militaries that occupy the world. they will work in harmony with the environment. They will be egalitarian, since everyone has needs and rights and great wealth is the final cause of corruption.
Teachers are professionals who have little or no accountability. All other professionals are held accountable for their performance. The teachers have no qualms about striking for their raises & benefits but dig in their heels regarding accountability.
FDR & George Meaney (AFL/CIO) thought public sector unions were wrong because they have nothing to bargain with. Private sector unions can bargain to increase the bottom line of the business. The public sector unions have nothing to give. Will cops arrest more crooks, firemen put out more fires, teachers teach more kids or will kids get better grades?
The largest piece of any local budget is the school tax. I'll bet that wherever you live 80% of the budget is salary & benefits. I would also bet that few here have the medical & retirement benefits enjoyed by the public sector. There are teachers in this general area retiring on $65K with medical coverage. At no point in their careers did the school systems have to show that that from contract to contract there was any improvement.
I think the benefit packages have to be brought in line with the private sector & there have to be measurements to determine who is or isn't doing a good job. I'm sure most be here get measured.
RSS feed for comments to this post