RSN April 14 Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "A cycle of overhyped terror plots involving government agency entrapment feeds a multimillion-dollar surveillance industry."

Portrait, author and activist Naomi Wolf, 10/19/11. (photo: Guardian UK)
Portrait, author and activist Naomi Wolf, 10/19/11. (photo: Guardian UK)



The Spectacle of Terror and Its Vested Interests

By Naomi Wolf, Guardian UK

10 May 12

 

he news stories, which quickly surface, long enough to cause scary headlines, then vanish before people can learn how often the cases are thrown out. These are stories about "bumbling fantasists", hapless druggies, the aimless, even the virtually homeless and mentally ill, and other marginal characters with not the strongest grip on reality, who have been lured into discourses about violence against America only after assiduous courting, and in some cases outright payment, by undercover FBI or police informants.

They have become a litany in recent years. The terrifying 2003-2004 national news stories that a Detroit "sleeper cell" had sent Muslim terrorists to blow up Disneyland and other landmarks, including in Las Vegas, was later thrown out of court, with accusations of prosecutorial misconduct, to almost no press attention – the same cycle of hype and failed convictions that have characterized many such stories. The evidence had included a home video taken in Disneyland, "doodles", and a guy with a credit card fraud problem, who had been pressured to diminish his own sentence by accusing his buddies.

But the tales of entrapment and terror hype continue apace – ten years after 9/11. Judith Miller, in Newsmax, writes that one recent case was so lame that even the FBI distanced itself from NYPD: "Despite FBI Doubts, NYPD Convinced Pipe Bomb Case Posed Real Danger", noted the headline on her 28 November 2011 article. A 27-year-old Dominican immigrant, Jose Pimentel, aka Muhamad Yusuf, had been monitored by NYPD for two years. Last fall, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr charged Pimentel with constructing pipe bombs to attack "police cars, post offices, veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan, and other targets".

An email in the case, which purports to show that Pimentel was writing about violent jihad to the al-Qaida-supporting "glossy magazine" Inspire, was described to Judith Miller by anonymous "law enforcement officials". Given Miller's journalistic history, this sentence alone should raise eyebrows. But the alleged email is, she writes, "part of a vast investigative file containing over 400 hours of surveillance audio and video tapes, interviews, and other material amassed by the NYPD". New York Police Commissioner Ray Kelly, in a flashy press conference, called the young man a "lone wolf" terrorist – a recent DHS soundbite. But the case was so shaky that the Federal Bureau of Investigation, as well as federal prosecutors, did not want to join the case: "Too many holes in the case", other anonymous officials told Miller.

Pimentel was one of what has become an army of FBI- or NYPD-entrapped losers. He had no money, no job, and at key points lived with his mom. The New York Times noted that he may have been psychologically "unstable", and that he had made threats after smoking pot. Officials say that in May 2010, he repeated loudly in Arabic that "America is my enemy." This scary guy was a circuit city clerk in Schenectady, New York.

Additional evidence that Miller's anonymous sources give for his being a terrorist? In 2010, he had $100. One witness told police "that he had flashed a $100 bill when he made some purchases."Another? "Pimentel scraped the heads of some 750 matches, officials say." The scenario that entrapped Pimentel involved a surround-sound of informants trying to entrap him in cyberspace and to lure him to incriminate himself in taped phone conversations. But the FBI dropped its involvement after they judged that the informant had been too active in helping: urging or arranging for Pimentel to start drilling into pipe pieces – the evidence that he intended to set off a bomb.

Many other, much-ballyhooed cases of "homegrown terrorism" show this creaky, effortful, farcical quality of people who, left to their own devices by the FBI or NYPD, would have remained harmlessly playing video games in their childhood bedrooms, smoking their doobies, or babbling gently to themselves, on their anti-psychotic meds, about geopolitical forces.

The "Newburgh Four" is another such case, as Russia Today reported: four African-American Muslims were found guilty recently of a plot to place bombs in two Bronx synagogues and to shoot down military aircraft in Newburgh. Another flashy press conference in May 2009 showcased these four men as "the faces of homegrown terrorism". The FBI had claimed that the men had planned to commit their acts of terrorism on the day that they were arrested. Joseph Demarest from the FBI called it "a terrifying plot".

The men were low-income former convicts who could not read or write with literacy. They could not drive and had no passports. Shahid Hussain, a Pakistani immigrant who was an FBI employee, got them to say they were going to commit these crimes – paying them $100,000. Hussain presented the men with a fake stinger missile, and Hussain offered these poverty-stricken men cars and money in exchange for their promise to carry out the manufactured plot.

The men's relatives accused the FBI of entrapment. "I do not think this is entrapment. I know it is. This is entrapment," said Alicia McWilliams-McCollum, aunt of 29-year-old David Williams. As with many of these scenarios, one can easily imagine poor people with criminal records, offered large sums of money by a fake jihadist, trying to get the money and then trick the instigator. Also, as any AA or Al-Anon counsellor can tell you, if drugs or alcohol are in the mix, entrapment is a ridiculous premise, too: an addict will say anything, and make any ludicrous promise, to get a giant check. It doesn't mean the addict has any intention of delivering on the supposed contract. David Williams' aunt says that her nephew is in prison because of a pretend terror attack created by the FBI:

"They are creating scenarios; they are manufacturing crimes. That would not have occurred if you had not planted an unconstructive seed into a community."

Attorney Steve Dowds, who tracks cases like the Newburgh Four, argues the US government is systematically employing preemptive prosecution:

"They are taking some down and out vulnerable individuals and not only planting the ideology of jihad on them, giving them all the things they need, all of the material. They are setting up the plan, giving them all the research and then grabbing them and claiming these were homegrown terrorists. It is just a fiction."

Now we have another "underwear bomber" – declared by the Pentagon to have been about to launch a major attack via a US-bound plane, but who appears, reportedly, to have been a CIA-run double agent. What is the evidence that the "device", which is supposedly so sophisticated that there is doubt as to whether existing surveillance technologies in US airports would have caught it, actually exists? As with so many of these stories, we have no independent verification – because reporters from the British Daily Telegraph, to Reuters, to the Huffington Post are simply taking dictation from New York Representative Peter King and from the Pentagon, and scarcely asking for backup evidence of their elaborate assertions.

It is important to note that we can no longer assume that the FBI and the CIA and the NSA work, first of all, for the safety of the American people; they also now represent a revolving door of government officials who become security industry lobbyists and manufacturers, which, in turn, get the multimillion-dollar contracts for tackling the very problems these stories appear to highlight. The stories about the first "underwear bomber" preceded the rollout of former DHS chief Michael Chertoff's costly scanners; the press interviews for this round of mystery "underwear bomber" stories are practically a press release for some expensive technological upgrade – or yet more hellishly invasive and demeaning search technique. The sad truth is that we can no longer report and consume such stories as if there were no commercial vested interests involved in creating and sustaining such "terror theater".

You know we have "terror theater" in the US because nations such as Israel, which are genuinely focussed on deterring terrorism, downplay risk and threats rather than trumpeting them, as DHS does. If the threat is real, they don't reveal all the details of the latest "planned attack" to the news media – because they are busy investigating real planned attacks, rather than doing corporate PR and product placement. Instead of TSA groping, aviation security, from Britain to Israel, to Spain to Norway, uses much less invasive and more acute security processes, such as face-to-face, in-line interviewing. They do not sell commercial products that subvert recall surety issues, such as the various costly and vastly lucrative new "Global Entry Trusted Traveller Network", an apparent government program that is not transparent or accountable. You can sign up for for a fee of $100 a year, after an interview. No TSA representative I interviewed knows who owns the initiative, which they said was private, not a government program; nor could they tell me where the money really goes.

Actual terrorism-fighting nations would never devolve such security concerns to private contractors or sell easier travel access for cash – because it is both dangerous and absurd to do so. In fact, what the FBI and CIA and the Pentagon are up against is that people – including Americans – are waking up to the fact that there would be no enemy if we weren't manufacturing new terrorists by taking out civilians in Pakistan, Yemen and Afghanistan. An end to foreign wars (which are already costing us thousands of casualties a year) would be a much more effective counter-terror strategy than this hyped, synthetic threat to justify a corporate surveillance-and-security product gold rush. Instead, we are treated to a spectacle orchestrated by alarmist officials who keep holding frightening press conferences promoting the threat of dazed, poor, drugged-out "lone wolves". The true, Orwellian agenda is to support a vast new crony-capitalist industry that uses terror theater to turn open democracies into surveillance societies.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+23 # dloehr 2012-05-10 07:08
Brilliant! I can still remember when our media -- the alleged Fourth Estate -- investigated and wrote like this. This hyped set of scare tactics will include 9-11, the Oklahoma City bombing (where investigators found explosives planted in the building, including directly over the nursery), the 1993 WTC bomb, and more. It's interesting how often the initial official story suspected Arab Muslims. We're being gamed.
 
 
+13 # bluepilgrim 2012-05-10 08:54
Anything with underwear plots you know right away the government is behind it; it, and especially the TSA, have long had a strange fascination with underwear. Also naked people, hoods, B&D -- the stuff you can read about in Krafft-ebing and certain adult internet sites, frequented by right wing closeted perverts.

OF COURSE it would be an underwear bomb -- unless it was a plot from the government shoe fetishists, or those intent on inspecting bottles of breast milk, creative crotch clutching, making fake menstrual blood, peeing on bodies, or doing strange things to people with light tubes. (These are things which actual Muslim fundamentalists would never think about.)

Hey -- did they ever think that someone could make a sling shot with bra elastic? Better check out the women's clothing in the inspection lines...

Freud would have a field day with this stuff! A new government field manual -- from Masters and Johnson.

Those whom the gods would destroy, they first drive mad.
 
 
+11 # cordleycoit 2012-05-10 09:19
This latest tale of pathos from the Middle East comes right at the very meoment our Congresss is being begged to take away all civil rights in cyber space. Underwear bombers. What young man is going to blow his nuts off? And face some awful pain for Allah? Not a sane person and we can rule out a world full of insane as well. Who buys these stories corrupt politicians of all stripes most know to the ladies of the beltway as John. Wacko gunpowder plots are nothing new. Judith Miller has found more unnamed informants, "there's a dance in the old girl yet."
 
 
+14 # Peace Anonymous 2012-05-10 09:21
As long as we are kept afraid there will be billions spent "protecting" us. Follow the money folks. This entire thought process has been brought to you by the good folks who orchestrated the Iraq and Afghan invasion. Anyone remember who the big winners were in those scenarios?
 
 
+5 # Artemis 2012-05-10 10:53
"You know we have "terror theater" in the US because nations such as Israel, which are genuinely focussed on deterring terrorism, downplay risk and threats rather than trumpeting them, as DHS does."
- Really? Like build a gigantic, ugly, apartheid Wall and call it 'security'? Defame and block peaceful activists who state they want to travel to the West Bank as guests of Palestinian peace groups? Allow rabid settlers to terrorize Palestinians?
 
 
+4 # Max Demian 2012-05-10 11:42
This article is absolute genius! Thank God for people like Naomi Wolf, and for their being aware, and quite knowledgeable about it in fact, that the U.S. government is manufacturing terror threats in order to use them to "justify" an endless "War (OF!) Terrorism", to "legitimize" unconstitutiona l and otherwise totally illegal wars of aggression ("the supreme international crime" according to the U.N. Charter, etc.) against countries that did NOT attack the U.S., and to set up an authoritarian, and increasingly totalitarian, militarized police state in the U.S. (and "justify" and "legitimize" it as well)!

Keep telling it like it is, Naomi Wolf, et al.; and God protect you from the retribution and/or retaliation(s) from the U.S. government for telling The People the real truth.

I'm so glad more and more Americans, not only journalists like Naomi Wolf, are waking up to what's really going on; and, as "Dloehr" said so aptly above, that "w)e're being gamed" with most of this terror hype, including about the "false flag" 'terror' attacks abroad as well, in order to expand the national and global security state, and eradicate civil liberties and human rights in the U.S. and all over the world, to lock us all down in an increasingly un-free global slave state in the names of "protecting us", "preserving 'freedom' and 'democracy'", and "combating 'terror(ists)'" . And that, in order to truly combat terror(ists), the government would have to combat themselves.
 
 
+1 # Max Demian 2012-05-10 13:46
Does The West Have A Future?

infowars.com/does-the-west-have-a-future/
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN